Background of the study:
Voting requires a lot of accuracy and precision. One wrong vote is very essential for the
future of a beloved country. Paper based voting system is with disabilities and
vulnerable to corruption and can be found in the elections.
Fingerprint based voting system is implemented using the Arduino. The systems read the
data from the fingerprint module then verify the data and take the next action. The
advantages of fingerprint based voting system is it provides chance to avoid invalid
votes, it reduces the polling time, it reduces the staff of voting center, it provides easy
and accurate counting without any troubles, it provides voting preventive measures.
Voting can be a trouble but counting the number of votes is the headache and the
main source of cheating in the elections. It can reach several days to accomplish
accumulating all the votes from all over the country.
The 1949 elections, for example, was labelled as the worst elections held in the
Philippines due to mass electoral fraud, which mostly occurred in Lanao and Negros
provinces. Most of the votes turned out in favor of candidates of the then ruling Liberal
Party. In a journal article published March 1954, Ohio University professor emeritus
Willard Elsbree recalled how a Commission on Elections (Comelec) official declared
that “there is no more democracy in the Philippines” during the 1949 election season.
“Fraud and violence were rife. On election day, members of the constabulary and
‘good squads’ roamed the streets to intimidate supporters of the opposition party.
Registration lists were padded to almost comic proportions. It was said that ‘the birds,
the bees and the flowers’ voted in some districts where the number of votes nearly
equaled the total population,” Elsbree wrote.
An amendment on Section 76, Republic Act 180 or the Revised Election Code, passed
on June 1947, gave way to this massive electoral fraud as it denied the Comelec
authority in the appointment of the board of election inspectors (BOI). Following
pressure from poll watchdog National Citizens’ Movement for Free Elections (Namfrel)
prior to the 1951 elections, the Comelec initiated reforms to address concerns on
electoral fraud. Namfrel was founded that year to stand as a non-partisan election
monitoring group to prevent election fraud and has since done this task until the 2016
elections. One of the revisions that the Comelec made was to require that the BOI be
composed of one representative each from the majority and minority parties and an
independent appointee. Note that in the 1949 polls, the election inspectors were
dominated by the majority party. De La Salle University professor Cleo Calimbahin, an
expert on electoral reform, wrote in an article titled “Capacity and compromise:
COMELEC, NAMFREL and election fraud” that the poll body made changes in the
system such as giving itself the authority to assign polling precincts, prepare voters’ list
and handle ballot management. In an attempt to prevent so-called flying voters, the
Comelec also imposed a residency requirement for voters. By 1986, the Comelec would
be known as “highly partisan” and “biased” under the Marcos dictatorship. Namfrel
played a key role in the elections that year by providing an alternative quick count.
“Consistently used as an instrument for vote manipulation during the pre-martial law
period, the Comelec did not initiate reforms after 1969 as Marcos had the commission a
part of his machinery and extended patronage both to the commissioners and the
larger Comelec bureaucracy,” Calimbahin wrote. Until 2007, the Philippines used the
manual election system, which was noticeably vulnerable as it was hard to pinpoint
whether there was human error or a deliberate attempt to manipulate results.