APPENDIX C

OTHERS
 Appendix C-1

Geo-Technical Conditions
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
and Sewerage System for Astana City
Final Report

APPENDIX C-1 GEO-TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION

C-1.1 General
In the Basic Design report, geo-technical characteristics were discussed mainly referring to
the results of field investigation in the Feasibility Study. Data obtained through field
investigations as of end of February supplemented previous data, which are the basis for
design of foundation of facilities.

Using consolidated data and information as mentioned above, geo-technical characteristics at

each premises of facility are discussed in this Appendix.

C-1.2 Methodology Applied

As mentioned in the Basic Design report, the methods applied for soil investigations
correspond to GOST and SNiP . Raw data of test are attached to this report as Annexes A to
D. Supplementary explanations on calculation method of bearing capacity including some
formulas are made in this sub-section.

The standard penetration test is generally applied for soil investigations in Japan and other
countries. This method is used to obtain the data on the geo-technical condition N-value
with undisturbed sample. This method, however, is not applied in the Republic of
Kazakhstan.

For the reference, converted N-value was calculated on the basis of the results of the static
penetration test, since the method and equipment applied is same as the Dutch cone
penetration test. In general, N-value is converted by using following formula:

qc = 4N

where, qc : static penetrate resistance (kgf/cm2)

However, it is suggested that different coefficient should be applied depending on geological

layers. In this report, following formulas are applied:

for clay layer : qc = 3N

for sandy layer : qc = 4N

Bearing capacity R0 for the spread foundation is calculated in accordance with SNiP and is
displayed in Table 1. The values are calculated under the condition of width b0 = 1m and
penetration depth d0 = 2m. For the purpose of comparison, allowable bearing capacity (qa)
is calculated using the result of static penetration test under the same condition with bearing
capacity R0. Formula applied is as follows:

qa = (1/40)*qc*B(1+Df/B)

C-1-1
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
and Sewerage System for Astana City
Final Report

where, Df (penetration depth): 2m

B (width of foundation): 1m

qc(static penetration resistance): ton/m2

Mechanical properties are displayed in Table 1 and Annex B for raw data. In the column of
Cohesion, Angle of internal friction and Deformation module, both of values obtained during
Feasibility study in accordance with SNiP 2.02.02-83 and by tri-axial test during this study
are displayed. For the design purpose, it is recommended to utilize the latter value, if two
figures are obtained.

Investigation of ground corrosion activity was carried out in accordance with GOST 9.602-89
for steel and SNiP 2.03.11-85 for concrete. The level of soil aggressive impact on concrete
by cement types and on steel are determined on the basis of the results of chemical analysis of
soil moisture (see Tables 3 and 4, Annex C for raw data). Corrosion activity of soil is also
investigated using dried soil sample (see Table5). Water aggressiveness to the concrete is
determined on the basis of the results of chemical analysis of water samples (see Annex D).

C-1.3 Geo-technical Conditions of each Facility

(1) Water Treatment Plant (WTP)

1) General

The existing WTP constructed on the alluvial plain consisting of weathering Mesozoic crust,
is located in the eastern part of the Astana city. The elevation of land varies from 351 to
354mASL inclining slightly from south to north. During the feasibility study, geo-technical
investigations were carried out at six points in the premise of WTP. Furthermore, additional
eight points were selected in order to obtain more detailed data on soil conditions. These
points were determined taking into account the plan of facilities to be constructed.
Locations of boring points and profiles are shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2(1)-(9),
respectively.

2) Geo-Technical Conditions

Based on the results of investigations, geological unit in this area was classified into seven
layers from the geo-technical point of view, which are (0 and 0a) soil vegetation layer and
sandy clay, (I) light arenaceous sandy clay, (II) dusty average coarseness sand, (III)
polymictic loamy average coarseness sand, (IV) compact gravelly sand, (V) light dusty sandy
clay, and (VI) clay (see Table 1). In this report, two surface layers are regarded as same

C-1-2
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
and Sewerage System for Astana City
Final Report

layer.

The sand layer composed of the layers from (II) to (IV), changes its faces gradually from
place to place. On the other hand, sandy clay layer (I) is distributed in whole area of WTP
(see Figure 2(1) - (9)). The groundwater level is mainly observed in the (I) sandy clay.
The flow direction of groundwater is from south to north harmonizing with ground level.
The level of groundwater in August 2000 is from 0.95 to 2.40mbgl. There is no significant
seasonal groundwater fluctuation in this area. According to the SNiP 2.02.01-83 and
2.01.01-82, the depth of seasonal ground freezing is as follows: sandy clay-189cm, thin and
dusty sand-230cm and sand of middle coarseness, coarse and gravelly-246cm.

Geo-technical characteristics of the soil and results of laboratory tests are summarized in
Tables 1 and 2. Facilities to be constructed in the area are water-retaining structures and
administration buildings. Depths of the foundation of water-retaining structures are between
3 and 10m from the designed ground level. The layers under the foundation of designed
facilities are from layer (II) dusty average coarseness sand to layer (VI) clay. The layer (II)
consisting of dusty average coarseness sand having insufficient bearing capacity is mainly
distributed in northeastern part of WTP. Taking into account the results of static penetration
test, it is also concluded that calculated bearing capacity is insufficient. Sand layers of (II)
having insufficient bearing capacity and (III) which seem to be intercalated layer should not
be regarded as bearing layer. Layer (IV) compact gravelly sand, which seems to be having
enough capacity, is distributed in the southwest and northeast part of the WTP premises.
Considering these conditions, layers from (IV) to (VI) can be considered as bearing layer.
Depth to these bearing layers from the bottom of some designed facilities is more than three
meters. Therefore, the pile foundation is recommended for these facilities.

As shown in Table 1, the layer (I) consisting of sandy clay cannot be regarded as having
sufficient bearing capacity, even for the three floors administration building. In addition,
sand layer distributing under the layer (I) does not have enough bearing capacity.
Considering these conditions, pile foundation of which bearing layer is the layer (V) or (VI),
is recommended.

3) Soil Corrosion Activity

According to the investigation for the ground corrosion activity, most of the level of corrosion
activity to steel is more than medium (see Table 3). The Portland cement has a low
aggression against SO4 and Cl (see Table 4). Relatively high concentration of sulphate is
observed in layer (I) and (II). Layers from (IV) to (VI) are classified as not aggressive to
concrete (see Annex C). The result of corrosion activity of soil taken from excavations point

C-1-3
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
and Sewerage System for Astana City
Final Report

shows low to medium corrosive to portland cement (see Table 5 and Figure 1 for location).

Considering these conditions, it is recommended to take the relevant countermeasures against

soil aggressive property to steel and portland cement.

(2) Sewerage Treatment Plant (STP)

1) General

The STP is located in the southwestern part of Astana city. The treated water is discharged
into the Taldykol Lake located southward of the STP. The land of STP is almost flat and its
elevation is around 343mASL. During the feasibility study, geo-technical investigations
were carried out at seven points. Within the framework of this study, five points were
selected on the basis of the plan of the facilities to be constructed in order to obtain more
detailed information of the soil conditions of the area. Locations of these boring points and
profiles are shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4 (1)-(9), respectively.

2) Geo-Technical Conditions

Based on the results of investigations, geological unit in this area was classified into seven
layers in terms of the geo-technical point, which are (0 and 0a) soil vegetation layer and sandy
clay, (I) light arenaceous sandy clay, (II) loamy arenaceous sand, (III) polymictic average
coarseness sand, (IV) polymictic coarse-grained sand, (V) light dusty gravelly sandy clay and
(VI) light dusty clay (see Table 1). In this report, two surface layers are regarded as one
layer.

The layer (I) consisting of arenaceous sandy clay is distributed in whole area. It is observed
that the lower part of the layer (I) arenaceous sandy clay is gradually changed to the layer (II)
loamy arenaceous sand from south to northe. Sand layers under the layer (II) loamy sand
mainly composed of polimictic coarse-grained sand, are distributed throughout premises of
STP. In the western part of premises (boring points are No.11, 15 and 16), the facies of
upper part of sand layer is gradually changed from the layer (IV) polimictic coarse-grained
sand to the layer (III) average coarseness sand. The intercalation of the layer (V) sandy clay
including organic remains (flora) is also observed between two sand layers (III and IV).
These indicate that the grain size of sand layer changes to finer in the western part of the
premises.

The elevation of groundwater in each boring point is almost same. Considering the location
of the Taldykol Lake, the groundwater within the premises of STP flows in the direction from
north to south in general, with very gentle inclination. The groundwater table is observed as

C-1-4
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
and Sewerage System for Astana City
Final Report

GL. -0.95 to -2.63m in September 2000. There is no significant groundwater fluctuation in

this area. According to the SNiP 2.02.02-83 and 2.01.01-82, the depths of seasonal ground
freezing are as follows: sandy clay – 189cm, thin and dusty sands – 230cm and sands of
middle coarseness, coarse and gravelly – 246cm.

Geo-technical characteristics of the soils and results of laboratory tests are summarized in
Tables 1 and 2. Facilities to be constructed for STP are mainly water-basin structures. The
depths of bottom of facilities vary between 2 and 10m from the designed ground level. The
layers under the shallow foundation facility such as settlement tank are layer (I) light sandy
clay or the layer (II) loamy sand. The calculated bearing capacities of these two layers are
insufficient to bear such heavy structures. Furthermore, the results of static penetration test
also reveal insufficient bearing capacity (refer to Table 1). In addition, considering the
influence of frost heave, it is required to design the suitable foundation for the settlement tank.
The layer under the deeper foundation facility such as the digester is the layer (VI) clay
having sufficient bearing capacity. This layer is the Mesozoic strata and is regarded as
basement of this area.

In case, the set of earth retaining wall is required for the construction of the deep foundatio
facilities, the mechanical characteristics of layers above the layer (VI) clay should be taken
into consideration.

3) Soil Corrosion Activity

According to the investigation for the ground corrosion activity, the level of corrosion activity
to steel varies from low to high (see Table 3). Soils of this area have sulphate aggressive
both low and high to all concrete types of portlandcement, and low aggressive to concrete of
W4 type of slagportrandcement (see Table 4). High concentration of sulphate is observed in
layer (0) surface soil (see Annex C). Even in the underlying layers (I), (IV) and (VI), level
of corrosive is relatively high. The result of corrosion activity of soil taken from
excavations point shows low corrosive to portland cement (see Table 5, Figure 2 for location).
Considering these conditions, it is recommended to take the suitable countermeasure against
corrosion. The classification of concrete W4, W6 and W8 is described in Annex E.

(3) Water Intake Tower

1) General

Vyacheslavsky Reservoir, which is the main source of water supply of Astana city, is located
around 50km southeast from Astana city. A new water intake tower is designed about 100m

C-1-5
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
and Sewerage System for Astana City
Final Report

northeastward of the existing water intake. During the feasibility study, geo-technical
investigations were carried out at three points. According to the results, the bearing capacity
of the planned strata seems to be sufficient for supporting of the facility. In order to ensure
the sufficiency and sequence including an inclination of bearing layer, additional two points
were selected. Locations of boring points and profiles are shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6
(1) - (3), respectively.

2) Geo-Technical Conditions

Based on the results of investigations, the geological units of this area were classified into
four layers, which are (I) light arenaceous sandy clay, (II) heavy arenaceous sandy clay with
interlayer of fine sand, (III) loamy sand with weathering sandstone, (IV) weathered
medium-grained sandstone.

From the geological point of view, the layer (II) sandy clay is considered as a part of layer (I)
light arenaceous sandy clay (see Figure 6 (1) - (3)). The layer (III) loamy sand with
weathering sandstone is regarded as a weathering part of layer (IV) sandstone. Elevations of
groundwater at three boring points were almost the same as that of the reservoir water.
According to the SNiP, the depth of seasonal ground freezing of sandy clay is 189cm.

Geo-technical characteristics of the soils and the results of laboratory tests are summarized in
Tables 1 and 2. Thickness of the layer (I) light arenaceous sandy clay with intercalation of
layer (II) is from 10 to 13m. Elevation of the bottom of layer (I) is around 386mASL. The
thin layer (III) consisting of loamy sand with weathering sandstone is distributed between
layer (I) and layer (IV). The layer (IV) consisting of Ordovician sandstone, which is
considered as a basement rock in this area, has a sufficient bearing capacity. The elevation
of top of the layer (IV) is around 385mASL plunging slightly into northeast.

Since the elevation of foundation of the facility is designed to reach to the layer (IV) with few
meters of penetration depth, the earth pressure of layer (I) and (II) should be taken into
consideration of facility designing.

3) Soil Corrosion Activity

According to the investigation for soil corrosion activity, the level of activity to steel varies
from low to high (see Table 3). Soil moisture is not aggressive to all types of concretes (see
Table 4). Concentration of sulphate of layer (I) and (II) is relatively low (see Annex C).
Considering these conditions, suitable corrosion proofing against sulphate is recommended.

(4) River Crossing Point

C-1-6
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
and Sewerage System for Astana City
Final Report

1) General

River crossing point at Ishym river is situated on south of Astana city. The elevations of
boring points are around 400mASL. Within the framework of this study, geo-technical
investigation was carried out at two points located at both side of the river. Locations of
these boring points and profiles are shown in Figure 7 and Figure 8, respectively. River
crossing point was shifted to north from original point. However, geological situation at
shifted point can be considered similar to that of original point, because both points are
located along the river.

2) Geo-Technical Conditions

Based on the results of investigations, geological unit in this area was classified into five
layers in terms of geo-technical point, which are (0) soil vegetation layer, (I) dark-grey sandy
loam, (II) brownish-grey sandy loam, (III) coarse grained sand and (IV) clayey loam. The
layer (II) consisting of dark gray sandy loam is become thicker eastward, on the other hand,
layer (III) consisting of brownish gray sandy loam is become thinner eastward. Top of the
layer (IV) consisting of clay loam including crust of weathering sandstone is inclined from
west to east.

Geo-technical characteristics of the soils and results of laboratory tests are summarized in
Tables 1 and 2. Facilities to be constructed at Ishym river crossing point is invert siphon.

Physical and mechanical properties of layers of (IV) and (V) are measured during this study.
These properties of the layer from (I) to (III) shown in tables are obtained from the other
boring point along the Ishym river, which is located about 1km south from original point.

3) Soil Corrosion Activity

According to the investigation for ground corrosion activity, the level of corrosion activity to
steel is low in shallow and high in deeper part (see Table 3). Aggressive impact on concrete
varies from not aggressive to medium aggressive (see Table 4). Considering these
conditions, suitable corrosion proofing for the facilities is required.

C-1-7
 and Sewerage System for Astana City
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
Table 1 Mechanical Properties and Calculated Bearing Capacity

Depth of layer C oefficient Coefficient of Allowable

Angle of internal Static penetrate C alcula ted
base Layer thickness C ohesion Deformation module of lateral Permeability bearing
Geological friction resistance C onverted N- resistance R 0
Facility Layer Geological Description occurrence Pressure k capacity
Time value

1) 2 2) 2 1) 2) 1) 2 2) 2 2 2 1) 2
m m kgf/cm kgf/cm degree degree kgf/cm kgf/cm m/day kgf/cm ton/m ton/m

0 Soil vegetation layer Q IV 0.2 - 0.3 0.2 - 0.3 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
WATER TREATMENT PLANT

a
0 Sandy Clay, solid Q IV 0.3 - 1.0 0.3 - 1.0 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
1)
1 Sandy Clay, light, arenaceous Q II-III 1.7 - 3.4 1.4 - 3.2 0.25 0.43 19 22 142 56 0.19 0.18 17 / 87 4 / 22 13 /65 25
2 Sand, average c oarseness, dusty, polymictic Q I-II 2.8 - 6.5 1.1 - 2.0 0.04 --- 30 --- 187 --- --- 0.71 13 3 10 10
3 Sand, average c oarseness, polymictic Q I-II 4.9 - 8.0 2.3 - 3.3 0.02 --- 38 --- 253 --- --- 0.70 45 11 34 40
4 Sand, gravelly, compact Q I-II 3.7 - 8.0 0.7 - 3.8 0.01 --- 40 --- 309 --- --- 2.56 60 15 45 50
1)
5 Sandy Clay, light, dusty Q I-II 5.5 - 11.5 1.8 - 5.9 0.25 0.71 19 19 160 63 0.16 0.18 33 9 25 25
6 C lay, dusty, yellow Mz --- --- 0.33 0.58 19 24 336 65 0.14 --- 30 / (79) 8 / (20) 22 / (60) 70.5/106.5
C-1-8

0 Soil vegetation layer Q IV 0.3 0.3 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
a
0 Sandy Clay, solid, low humid Q IV 0.5 0.5 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
TREATMENT PLANT

Q III-IV 1)
1 Sandy Clay, light, arenaceous 2.0 - 6.8 1.5 - 6.5 0.3 --- 22 --- 214 --- --- 0.18 12 3 9 24.5
SEWERAGE

1)
2 Loamy Sand,, arenaceous Q I-II 3.5 - 6.0 1.5 - 3.0 0.15 --- 26 --- 240 --- --- 0.18 14 / (91) 3 / (23) 11 / (68) 20
3 Sand, average c oarseness, polymictic Q I-II 5.5 - 8.8 1.5 - 2.8 0.02 --- 38 --- 400 --- --- 1.95 110 28 82 40
4 Sand, coa rse-grained Q I-II 10.2 - 11.8 1.7 - 6.6 0.01 --- 40 --- 400 --- --- 27.1 104 26 77 50
1)
5 Sandy Clay, light, dusty Q I-II 9.3 0.5 0.42 --- 25 --- 305 --- --- 0.18 --- --- --- 29.5
6 C lay, light, dusty Mz --- --- 0.39 0.69 21 18 170 53 0.14 --- (28) (9) (21) 37
1)
1 Sandy Clay, light, arenaceous Q II-III 13.5 - 15.8 10.6 - 13.5 0.25 0.78 21 18 150 46 0.17 0.18 17 / 14 4 13 / 11 21
WATER INTAKE

1)
2 Sandy Clay, heavy, arenaceous Q II-III 7.3 - 7.5 3.6 - 4.3 0.22 0.61 18 9 120 25 0.16 0.18 3 1 2 19
3 Loamy Sand Mz 14.3 - 16.8 0.3 - 1.0 0.48 0.71 24 28 210 37 0.19 --- --- --- --- 30
4 Sandstone, medium-grained O1 ? --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 100
0 Soil vegetation layer Q IV 0.1 - 0.2 0.1 - 0.2 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
CROSSING POINT
ISHYM RIVER

1 Sandy Loam , heavy, dark-grey Q III 0.8 - 1.0 0.7 - 0.8 (0.25) --- (23) --- (170) --- --- --- 40 10 30 (23)
2 Sandy Loam , brownish-grey Q II-III 1.8 - 5.3 1.0 - 4.3 (0.13) --- (24) --- (100) --- --- --- 14 4 11 (24)
3 Sand, coa rse-grained Q I-II 6.3 - 9.0 1.0 - 7.2 (0.01) --- (40) --- (400) --- --- 41.1 18 5 14 (50)
4 Loam, light, dusty Mz --- --- --- 0.76 --- 23 --- 82 0.13 --- 46 11 34 ---
Note: " 1) " means figure obtained during the Feasibility Study in acc ordance with SNiP 2.02.02-83

Final Report
" 2) " means the figure obtained by tri-a xial test in this study
"( figure )" m eans the figure obtained from only one sample
 and Sewerage System for Astana City
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
Table2 Physical Properties

Natural Specific
Liquid Plastic Plasticity Liquidity Consistency Void Degree of
Depth of layer Water gravity of soil Wet Density Dry Density
Geological Layer thickness Limit Limit Index Index Index Ratio Saturation
Facility Layer Geological Description Time
base occurrence Content particle
ρ ρd
WL WP IP W IL Ic Gs(ρs) 3 3 e Sr
m m g/cm g/cm
0 Soil vegetation layer Q IV 0.2 - 0.3 0.2 - 0.3 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
WATER TREATMENT PLANT

a Q IV
0 Sandy Clay, solid 0.3 - 1.0 0.3 - 1.0 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
1 Sandy Clay, light, arenaceous Q II-III 1.7 - 3.4 1.4 - 3.2 25.1 14.5 10.6 15.4 -0.09 0.93 2.72 2.06 1.78 0.52 0.81
2 Sand, average coarseness, dusty, polymictic Q I-II 2.8 - 6.5 1.1 - 2.0 27.3 13.6 13.8 20.8 0.53 0.47 2.71 2.23 1.85 0.47 1.20
3 Sand, average coarseness, polymictic Q I-II 4.9 - 8.0 2.3 - 3.3 --- --- --- 17.4 --- --- 2.70 2.23 1.90 0.42 1.10
4 Sand, gravelly, compact Q I-II 3.7 - 8.0 0.7 - 3.8 --- --- --- --- (0.28) (0.72) 2.73 (2.16) (1.83) (0.47) (1.01)
5 Sandy Clay, light, dusty Q I-II 5.5 - 11.5 1.8 - 5.9 32.6 19.1 13.4 20.8 0.08 0.92 2.72 2.08 1.73 0.58 0.95
6 Clay, dusty, yellow Mz --- --- 41.8 26.0 15.8 23.5 -0.33 1.33 2.73 1.97 1.61 0.71 0.90
C-1-9

0 Soil vegetation layer Q IV 0.3 0.3 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
a Q IV
0 Sandy Clay, solid, low humid 0.5 0.5 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
TREATMENT PLANT

1 Sandy Clay, light, arenaceous Q III-IV 2.0 - 6.8 1.5 - 6.5 25.1 15.9 9.2 19.4 0.33 0.67 2.72 2.01 1.68 0.62 0.86
SEWERAGE

2 Loamy Sand,, arenaceous Q I-II 3.5 - 6.0 1.5 - 3.0 20.6 15.4 5.2 21.3 1.12 -0.13 2.70 2.12 1.75 0.55 1.07
3 Sand, average coarseness, polymictic Q I-II 5.5 - 8.8 1.5 - 2.8 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
4 Sand, coarse-grained Q I-II 10.2 - 11.8 1.7 - 6.6 --- --- --- --- --- --- 2.69 --- --- --- ---
5 Sandy Clay, light, dusty Q I-II 9.3 0.5 28.0 16.0 12.0 16.7 0.06 0.94 2.72 2.12 1.82 0.50 0.91
6 Clay, light, dusty Mz --- --- 46.3 22.7 23.6 24.5 0.03 0.97 2.72 2.01 1.63 0.70 0.95

1 Sandy Clay, light, arenaceous Q II-III 13.5 - 15.8 10.6 - 13.5 32.8 18.4 14.4 22.7 0.3 0.7 2.71 1.99 1.62 0.68 0.92
INTAKE
WATER

2 Sandy Clay, heavy, arenaceous Q II-III 7.3 - 7.5 3.6 - 4.3 33.9 19.4 14.6 25.6 0.44 0.56 2.72 2.04 1.62 0.68 1.02
3 Loamy Sand Mz 14.3 - 16.8 0.3 - 1.0 20.2 13.1 7.1 16.4 0.5 0.5 2.69 2.12 1.82 0.48 0.91
4 Sandstone, medium-grained O1 ? --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---

1 Soil vegetation layer Q IV 0.1 - 0.2 0.1 - 0.2 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
CROSSING POINT
ISHYM RIVER

2 Sandy Loam, heavy, dark-grey Q III 0.8 - 1.0 0.7 - 0.8 *32 *19 *13 *20 *0.08 *0.92 *2.73 *1.88 *1.57 *0.74 *0.74
3 Sandy Loam, brownish-grey Q II-III 1.8 - 5.3 1.0 - 4.3 *25 *18 *7 *19.6 *0.23 *0.77 *2.70 *1.86 *1.55 *0.74 *0.72
4 Sand, coarse-grained Q I-II 6.3 - 9.0 1.0 - 7.2 --- --- --- 10.4 --- --- 2.71 --- --- --- ---
5 Loam, light, dusty Mz --- --- 30.9 17.0 14.0 18.8 0.19 0.89 2.71 2.07 1.75 0.57 0.9
Note: "( figure )" means the data of a part of the formation, not particular figure of the formation.

Final Report
" --- " means "not measured".
" * " means that the data are from other boring points near the Ishym river which are located 1 km south from crossing point
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
and Sewerage System for Astana City
Final Report

Table 3 Level of Ground Corrosion to the Carbon Steel

Facility

Well Depth of *)Anodized pipe Corrosion level of

Lab# Geology
No. Sampling(m) weight losing(gr) ground activity
1 476 1.0-2.7 light dusty sandy clay 1.13 medium
2 489 0.0-1.7 light dusty sandy clay 3.67 medium
4 509 0.0-2.6 light dusty sandy clay 1.1 medium
5 517 0.3-3.0 loamy sand 1.05 medium
6 523 0.2-2.5 light arenaceous sandy clay 1.3 medium
21 --- 0.5-0.7 clay loam, hevy N.A high
21 --- 2.0-2.5 clay loam, light N.A high
21 --- 14-15 clay loam soid N.A high
Water Treatment Plant

22 --- 1.35-1.45 Clay loam, heavy pulverulent solid N.A high

22 --- 2.0-2.15 Clay loam, heavy pulverulent semisolid N.A high
22 --- 2.9-3.1 Clay, light pulverulent tight-plastic N.A high
22 --- 3.1-3.3 Clay loam, heavy pulverulent soft-plastic N.A high
22 --- 12-12.2 Clay loam, heavy pulverulent semisolid N.A high
23 --- 4.5-5.5 Clay, light pulverulent tight-plastic N.A high
23 --- 6.8-7.0 Clay, light pulverulent tight-plastic N.A high
24 --- 10.0-12.0 Clay, light pulverulent tight-plastic N.A high
24 --- 12.5-12.7 Clay, heavy pulverulent semisolid N.A high
25 --- 8.0-8.2 Coarse sand N.A low
25 --- 10.15-10.5 Clay, light pulverulent soft-plastic N.A high
26 --- 6.0-6.25 Clay, heavy semisolid N.A high
27 --- 5.0-6.0 Gravel sand N.A low
27 --- 7.0-7.2 Clay, light pulverulent solid N.A high
28 --- 7.0-8.0 Gravel sand N.A medium
28 --- 9.2-9.6 Clay, light pulverulent semisolid N.A high
10 566 0.3-3.0 light, loam sandy clay 2.8 high
11 573 0.3-3.0 light, loam sandy clay 4.29 high
14 604 0.0-3.0 light, loam sandy clay 1.69 medium
Sewerage Treatment Plant

15 609 0.0-3.0 light, loam sandy clay 2.19 high

29 --- 10.0-11.0 Gravel sand N.A medium
29 --- 14-14.2 Clay heavy semisolid N.A high
30 --- 8.0-9.0 Gravel sand N.A low
30 --- 12.0-12.2 Clay, heavy semisolid N.A high
31 --- 7.0-8.0 Gravel sand N.A low
31 --- 13.0-13.2 Clay, heavy semisolid N.A high
32 --- 9.0-10.0 Gravel sand N.A medium
32 --- 12.5-12.7 Clay, heavy pulverulent semisolid N.A high
33 --- 8.0-9.0 Gravel sand N.A low
33 --- 12.0-12.2 Clay, heavy pulverulent tight-plastic N.A high
7 533 0.3-3.0 light sandy clay 2.84 high
8 543 0.0-4.5 heavy sandy clay 2.75 high
9 548 0.0-3.0 light sandy clay 0.41 low
Water Intake Tower

36 --- 0-3.2 Loam, dusty plastic N.A medium

36 --- 5-5.2 Clay, light, dusty, semi-hard N.A low
36 --- 8-8.2 Loam, heavy dusty, softy plastic N.A medium
36 --- 9.0-12.0 Loam, heavy, dusty, softly plastic N.A medium
36 --- 12-14.0 Loam, light,dusty softly plastic N.A low
37 --- 1.2-1.35 Clay, light, dusty N.A low
37 --- 3.2-3.4 Clay, light, dusty N.A medium
37 --- 6.0-12.7 Loam heavy dusty fluid plastic N.A medium
37 --- 12.7-14.6 Loam, light, arenaceous softly plastic N.A medium
34 --- 6.4-7.0 Coarse sand N.A low
Ishym
River

34 --- 10.2-10.4 Clay loam, light pulverulent tight-plastic N.A high

35 --- 5.3-6.3 Gravel sand N.A low
35 --- 7.0-8.0 Clay loam, light pulverulent semisolid N.A high
Note : result of chemcal analysis that is used for determination of corrosion level is displayed in Annex C
*) figures are obtained by method of weight losing in accordance with GOST 9.602-89

C-1-10
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
and Sewerage System for Astana City
Final Report

Table 4 Level of Aggressive Impact on Concrete and Ferroconcrete thinwalled Construction

Level of aggressive im pact on concrete by

Sam pling level of aggressive
Lab. N o. of cem ent types
interval im pact on a Cement Type
N o. W ell
(m ) ferroconcrete W4 W6 W8

Portlandcement Low Low non

476 1 1.0 - 2.7 non Slagportlandcement non non non
Sulphate stable non non non
Portlandcement Low Low non
489 2 0 - 1.7 Low Slagportlandcement non non non
Water Treatment Plant

Sulphate stable non non non

Portlandcement Low non non
496 3 0 - 1.5 non Slagportlandcement non non non
Sulphate stable non non non
Portlandcement Low non non
517 5 0.3 - 3.0 non Slagportlandcement non non non
Sulphate stable non non non
Portlandcement Low non non
523 6 1.0 - 1.2 Low Slagportlandcement non non non
Sulphate stable non non non

Portlandcement Low Low Low

573 11 0.3 - 3.0 N .A non non non
Sewerage Treatment Plant

Slagportlandcement
Sulphate stable non non non
Portlandcement H igh H igh H igh
604 14 0 - 0.3 N .A Slagportlandcement Low non non
Sulphate stable non non non
Portlandcement H igh H igh H igh
609 15 0 - 0.3 N .A Slagportlandcement Low non non
Sulphate stable non non non

Portlandcement non non non

- 36 0 - 3.2 non Slagportlandcement non non non
Sulphate stable non non non
Portlandcement non non non
- 36 9.0 - 12.0 Low Slagportlandcement non non non
Water Intake Tower

Sulphate stable non non non

Portlandcement non non non
- 37 1.2 - 1.35 Low Slagportlandcement non non non
Sulphate stable non non non
Portlandcement non non non
- 37 3.2 - 3.4 Low Slagportlandcement non non non
Sulphate stable non non non
Portlandcement non non non
- 37 12.7 - 14.6 Low Slagportlandcement non non non
Sulphate stable non non non

Portlandcement Low non non

- 34 6.4 - 7.0 non Slagportlandcement Low non non
Ishym River

Sulphate stable Low non non

Portlandcement M edium M edium Low
- 35 5.3 - 7.3 non Slagportlandcement non non non
Sulphate stable non non non

Note: Level of aggressive is determined on the basis of the result of quality analysis of soil moisture

C-1-11
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
and Sewerage System for Astana City
Final Report

Table 5 Result of Soil Corrosion Analysis

Degree of corrosive of soil on concrete and ferroconcrete

SO 4 2- (SNiP 2.03.11-85 Corrosion P rotection of Building
Sam pling Sam pling Components))
Facilities No.
Date Depth(m)
mg/kg Portland slag Suphate resistant
portland cement
of soil cement cement
1 25-Nov-02 2.9 0.04 non non non
W ater
2 25-Nov-02 3.0 484 Low non non
Treatm ent
Plant 3 25-Nov-02 3.5 243 non non non
4 27-Nov-02 3.4 749 M edium non non

Sewerage 1 10-Oct-02 2.7 110 non non non

Treatm ent 2 7-Oct-02 3.3 440 Low non non
Plant
3 7-Oct-02 2.8 243 non non non

1 --- --- 390 Low non non

along pipe
in City 2 --- --- 28 non non non
3 --- --- 3 non non non

Note: Lcation of sampling points are shown in Figure 1 for W TP, Figure 3 for STP and Figure 9 for pipe

C-1-12
 and Sewerage System for Astana City
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
No. 26
No. 6 No. 27 No. 28
No. 2 No. 1

No. 3 No. 4
No. 1 No. 21 No. 2
No. 5
C-1-13

No. 23
No. 25 No. 22

No. 4
No. 3
No. 24
LEGEND
No. 4
Boring Point

No. 1
Soil Sampling Point

Final Report
Figure 1 Location Map of Boring Points at Water Treatment Plant (WTP)
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
and Sewerage System for Astana City
Final Report
Geological Cross Section at Water Treatment Plant ( 1/9, Line No. 6-1-23-4 )
Figure 2(1)
C-1-14
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
and Sewerage System for Astana City
Final Report
Geological Cross Section at Water Treatment Plant ( 2/9, Line No. 6-26-27-28 )
Figure 2(2)
C-1-15
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
and Sewerage System for Astana City
Final Report
Geological Cross Section at Water Treatment Plant ( 3/9, Line No. 5-1-21-2 )
Figure 2(3)
C-1-16
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
and Sewerage System for Astana City
Final Report
Geological Cross Section at Water Treatment Plant ( 4/9, Line No. 3-4 )
Figure 2(4)
C-1-17
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
and Sewerage System for Astana City
Final Report
Geological Cross Section at Water Treatment Plant (5/9, Line No. 3-23-2 )
Figure 2(5)
C-1-18
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
and Sewerage System for Astana City
Final Report
Geological Cross Section at Water Treatment Plant ( 6/9, Line No. 28-2-4)
Figure 2(6)
C-1-19
 and Sewerage System for Astana City
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
C-1-20

Final Report
Figure 2(7) Geological Cross Section at Water Treatment Plant ( 7/9, Line No. 27-21-23-24 )
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
and Sewerage System for Astana City
Final Report
Geological Cross Section at Water Treatment Plant ( 8/9, Line No. 1-22-3 )
Figure 2(8)
C-1-21
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
and Sewerage System for Astana City
Final Report
Geological Cross Section at Water Treatment Plant ( 9/9, Line No. 6-5-25 )
Figure 2(9)
C-1-22
 and Sewerage System for Astana City
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
C-1-24

Final Report
Figure 4 (1) Geological Cross Section at Sewerage Treatment Plant ( 1/9, Line No. 10-29-12 )
 and Sewerage System for Astana City
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
C-1-25

Final Report
Figure 4(2) Geological Cross Section at Sewerage Treatment Plant ( 2/9, Line No. 14-30-13 )
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
and Sewerage System for Astana City
Final Report
Geological Cross Section at Sewerage Treatment Plant ( 3/9, Line No. 31-13 )
Figure 4(3)
C-1-26
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
and Sewerage System for Astana City
Final Report
Geological Cross Section at Sewerage Treatment Plant ( 4/9, Line No. 16-33 )
Figure 4(4)
C-1-27
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
and Sewerage System for Astana City
Final Report
Geological Cross Section at Sewerage Treatment Plant (5/9, Line No. 12-13 )
Figure 4(5)
C-1-28
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
and Sewerage System for Astana City
Final Report
Geological Cross Section at Sewerage Treatment Plant ( 6/9, Line No. 29-14-31)
Figure 4(6)
C-1-29
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
and Sewerage System for Astana City
Final Report
Geological Cross Section at Sewerage Treatment Plant ( 7/9, Line No. 10-11 )
Figure 4(7)
C-1-30
 and Sewerage System for Astana City
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
C-1-31

Final Report
Figure 4(8) Geological Cross Section at Sewerage Treatment Plant ( 8/9, Line No. 15-33-10 )
 and Sewerage System for Astana City
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
C-1-32

Final Report
Figure 4(9) Geological Cross Section at Sewerage Treatment Plant ( 9/9, Line No. 32-31-30 )
 and Sewerage System for Astana City
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
No. 37

No. 36

No. 7
C-1-33

No. 8

No. 9

Final Report
Figure 5 Location Map of Boring Points at Water Intake (Vyacheslavsky Reservoir)
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
and Sewerage System for Astana City
Final Report
Geological Cross Section at Water Intake Tower ( 2/3, Line No. 7-36 )
Figure 6(2)
C-1-35
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
and Sewerage System for Astana City
Final Report
Geological Cross Section at Water Intake Tower ( 3/3, Line No. 7-8-9 )
Figure 6(3)
C-1-36
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
and Sewerage System for Astana City
Final Report
Location Map of Boring Points at Ishym River
Figure 7
C-1-37
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
and Sewerage System for Astana City
Final Report
Geological Cross Section at Ishym River ( 1/1 Line No. 34-35 )
Figure 8
C-1-38
Detailed Design Study on Water Supply
and Sewerage System for Astana City
Final Report
A-2

Location Map of Soil Sample Taken for Corrosion Test

A-3
A-1

1,000 M

Figure 9
C-1-39
 Annex A(1) Result of Test for Physical Properties (WTP)

Grain Size Plastisity % Solidity

(relative water content)

Natural Water Content

Degree of Saturation
Depth of Sampling

Consistency Index

Specific gravity
Plasticity Index

Liquidity Index

of Permeability
of soil particle
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limit

Wet Density

Dry Density

Coefficient
Void Ratio
0.1-0.005

0.25-0.05
Hole No.
Lob. No.

Geology
2.0-0.25

0.5-0.25

0.25-0.1
2.0-1.0

1.0-0.5

<0.05
70-40

40-20

20-10
>70

10-5

5-2
m mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm g/cm3 g/cm3 m/day
WL WP IP W IL Ic Gs(ρs) ρ ρd e Sr ｋ
475 1 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.7 0 0 0 0 0 16.7 76.7 28 16 12 19 0.225 0.775 2.72 2.037 1.716 0.585 0.869 - light dusty sandy clay
476 1 1.0-2.7 0 0 0 3 3 2 11 0 0 0 0 0 26 55 22 14 8 - -1.75 - 2.72 - - - - -
477 1 3.0-4.5 0 0 0 4 2 5 0 9 23 14 24 3 0 16 - - - - - - 2.7 - - - - 0.6 middle coarseness sand
478 1 5.0-6.0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 12 27 26 2 0 27 - - - - - - 2.7 - - - - 0 dusty sand
479 1 6.0-6.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 17 30 17 1 0 34 - - - - - - 2.7 - - - - 0.5 dusty sand
480 1 6.0-6.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.3 0 0 0 0 0 20 56.7 28 17 11 24 0.586 0.409 2.72 2.355 1.907 0.426 1.497 - light sandy clay
481 1 7.5 0 0 0 1.5 6.5 10 0 4 13.5 22 16.5 1.5 0 24.5 - - - 17 - - 2.7 2.229 1.899 0.422 1.112 - middle coarseness sand
482 1 8.4 0 0 13.5 6 7 13 26.5 0 0 0 0 0 11.5 22.5 24 17 7 14 -0.495 1.5 2.7 2.171 1.912 0.412 0.8866 - dust gravelly sandy loam
483 1 9 0 0 0 0 11 15 20 0 0 0 0 0 14 40 27 17 10 13 -0.403 1.4 2.72 2.158 1.91 0.424 0.8319 - light gravelly dusty sandy clay
484 1 10.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 6.7 83.3 42 25 17 24 -0.06 1.059 2.73 1.949 1.572 0.737 0.8886 - heavy dusty sandy clay
485 1 12.0-12.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.7 0 0 0 0 0 6.7 86.7 41 30 11 23 -0.678 1.682 2.72 1.973 1.61 0.689 0.8898 - light dusty sandy clay
486 1 13.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 23.3 66.7 32 24 8 16 -1.04 2.038 2.72 2.151 1.86 0.463 0.9208 - light dusty sandy clay
C-1-40

487 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.7 0 0 0 0 0 23.3 70 26 15 11 16 0.045 0.955 2.72 2.105 1.822 0.493 0.8555 - light dusty sandy clay
488 2 1.7-2.5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 11 30 33 2 0 18 - - - - - - - - - - - 1.22 dusty sand
489 2 0.0-1.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.7 0 0 0 0 0 16.7 66.7 34 24 10 - - - - - - - - - light dusty sandy clay
490 2 2.8-4.0 0 0 0 12 13 15 0 4 9 10 15 5 0 17 - - - - - - - - - - - - gravelly sand
491 2 3.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 43.3 0 0 0 0 0 16.7 40 22 16 6 18 0.276 0.717 2.7 2.157 1.833 0.473 1.008 - sandy loam
492 2 4.0-4.3 0 0 0 2 2 11 0 7 36 16 8 2 0 16 coarse sand
493 2 4.5-4.7 0 0 0 4 2 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 17 66 30 17 13 21 0.334 0.669 2.73 2.086 1.719 0.588 0.9908 - heavy dusty sandy clay
494 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.3 0 0 0 0 0 3.3 93.3 32 22 10 27 0.502 0.5 2.72 2.088 1.644 0.655 1.122 - light dusty sandy clay
495 2 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.7 0 0 0 0 0 13.3 70 35 28 7 17 -1.52 2.529 2.7 1.987 1.694 0.594 0.7877 - dust sandy loam

496 3 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.3 0 0 0 0 0 33.3 43.3 22 15 7 20 0.65 0.357 2.7 2.173 1.818 0.485 1.087 - sandy loam
497 3 2.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 46.7 43.3 24 15 9 19 0.464 0.533 2.72 2.083 1.748 0.556 0.9374 - light sandy clay
498 3 3.0-3.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.3 0 0 0 0 0 43.3 43.3 21 15 6 15 -0.018 1.017 2.7 2.096 1.824 0.48 0.8376 - sandy loam
499 3 3.2-4.7 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 19 19 30 5 0 22 - - - - - - - - - - - 0.42 dusy sand
500 3 5.2 0 0 0 6 3 6 18 0 0 0 0 0 16 51 30 19 11 22 0.262 0.736 2.72 2.052 1.684 0.616 0.9667 - light dusty sandy clay with gravel
501 3 6.5-7.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.7 0 0 0 0 0 13.3 70 35 21 14 26 0.332 0.664 2.73 2.045 1.627 0.677 1.034 - heavy dusty sandy clay
501 3 6.5-7.2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 35 25 9 1 0 22 - - - - - - - - - - - - middle coarseness sand
502 3 8.0-8.2 0 0 0 13 4.5 6 15.5 0 0 0 0 0 11 50 24 15 9 21 0.667 0.333 2.72 2.163 1.787 0.522 1.095 - light gravelly dusty sandy clay
503 3 9 0 0 0 1 7 16 27 0 0 0 0 0 11 38 21 14 7 10 -0.61 1.61 2.7 2.301 2.097 0.287 0.9139 - dust sandy loam with gravel
504 3 10.5-11.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.7 0 0 0 0 0 3.3 90 51 33 18 33 -0.029 1.028 2.74 1.89 1.432 0.914 0.9741 - light dusty clay
505 3 13.7-14.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 80 38 25 13 17 -0.586 1.585 2.73 2.05 1.746 0.563 0.8428 - heavy dusty sandy clay
Note : These data are obtained during the Feasibility Study
" - " : not measured
 Annex A(1) Result of Test for Physical Properties (WTP)

Grain Size Plastisity % Solidity

(relative water content)

Natural Water Content

Degree of Saturation
Depth of Sampling

Consistency Index

Specific gravity
Plasticity Index

Liquidity Index

of Permeability
of soil particle
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limit

Wet Density

Dry Density

Coefficient
Void Ratio
0.1-0.005

0.25-0.05
Hole No.
Lob. No.

Geology
2.0-0.25

0.5-0.25

0.25-0.1
2.0-1.0

1.0-0.5

<0.05
70-40

40-20

20-10
>70

10-5

5-2
m mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm g/cm3 g/cm3 m/day
WL WP IP W IL Ic Gs(ρs) ρ ρd e Sr ｋ
Grain Size Plastisity % Solidity

(relative water content)

Natural Water Content

Degree of Saturation
Depth of Sampling

Consistency Index

Specific gravity
Plasticity Index

Liquidity Index

of Permeability
of soil particle
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limit

Wet Density

Dry Density

Coefficient
Void Ratio
0.1-0.005

0.25-0.05
Hole No.
Lob. No.

Geology
2.0-0.25

0.5-0.25

0.25-0.1
2.0-1.0

1.0-0.5

<0.05
70-40

40-20

20-10
>70

10-5

5-2
m mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm g/cm3 g/cm3 m/day
WL WP IP W IL Ic Gs(ρs) ρ ρd e Sr ｋ
507 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 16.7 73.3 27 15 12 15.7 0.054 0.942 2.72 1.964 1.698 0.602 0.7076 - light dusty sandy clay
508 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.7 0 0 0 0 0 16.7 66.7 27 15 12 19.4 0.366 0.633 2.72 1.917 1.606 0.694 0.7599 -
509 4 0.0-2.6
510 4 2.6-4.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 58 22 1 0 18 - - - - - - - - - - - 0.8 middle coarseness sand
511 4 4.9-5.6 0 0 0 3.5 6.5 18 0 10 20 15 5 8.5 0 13.5 - - - - - - - - - - - - gravelly sand
512 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.7 0 0 0 0 0 26.7 56.7 28 18 10 17.2 -0.079 1.08 2.72 2.06 1.758 0.547 0.8553 - light sandy clay
C-1-41

513 4 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.7 0 0 0 0 0 3.3 90 48 34 14 34.3 0.019 0.979 2.73 1.909 1.421 0.921 1.016 - heavy dusty sandy clay
514 4 14.2-14.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.3 0 0 0 0 0 3.3 93.3 41 30 11 23.8 -0.564 1.564 2.72 1.913 1.545 0.76 0.8512 - light dusty sandy clay

515 5 1.0-1.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 36.7 0 0 0 0 0 26.7 36.7 20 15 5 10.6 -0.879 1.88 2.7 1.918 1.734 0.557 0.5139 - sandy loam
516 5 2 0 0 0 2 3 5 26 0 0 0 0 0 31 33 19 14 5 12.5 -0.297 1.3 - - - - - - sandy loam
517 5 0.3-3.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
518 5 4 0 0 0 11 8 18 21 0 0 0 0 0 9 33 21 15 6 11 -0.661 1.667 2.7 1.952 1.758 0.536 0.5563 - dust sandy loam with gravel
519 5 4.5-8.0 0 0 0 14 7 16 0 5 14 12 7 6 0 19 - - - - - - - - - - - -
520 5 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.7 0 0 0 0 0 6.7 86.7 43 32 11 32.6 0.058 0.945 2.72 1.892 1.426 0.907 0.9784 - light dusty sandy clay
521 5 13.8-14.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 3.3 86.7 43 32 11 31.7 -0.03 1.027 2.72 1.908 1.449 0.877 0.982 - light dusty sandy clay

522 6 1.0-1.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.7 0 0 0 0 0 20 53.3 21 15 6 15.7 0.121 0.883 2.7 2.062 1.782 0.515 0.8239 - dust sandy loam
523 6 0.2-2.5 0 0 0 0 2 3 21 0 0 0 0 0 30 44 30 16 14 - -1.14 - 2.73 - - - - - heavy sandy clay
524 6 2.5-3.7 0 0 0 0 5 24 0 11 20 15 7 12 0 6 - - - - - - - - - - - 2.56 gravelly sand
525 6 4.3-4.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.3 0 0 0 0 0 6.7 90 37 21 16 23 0.128 0.875 2.73 2.039 1.657 0.647 0.9718 - heavy dusty sandy clay
526 6 6.2-6.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.7 0 0 0 0 0 6.7 66.7 41 30 11 25.4 -0.417 1.418 2.72 1.918 1.529 0.779 0.8875 - light dusty sandy clay
527 6 12.2-12.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.3 0 0 0 0 0 33.3 43.3 41 30 11 16.3 -1.24 2.245 2.72 2.066 1.776 0.532 0.8358 - light sandy clay
Note : These data are obtained during the Feasibility Study
" - " : not measured
 Annex A(2) Result of Test for Physical Properties (WTP)

Grain Size Plastisity % Solidity

(relative water content)

Natural Water Content

Degree of Saturation
Depth of Sampling

Consistency Index

Specific gravity
Plasticity Index

Liquidity Index

of Permeability
of soil particle
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limit

Wet Density
0.01-0.005

Dry Density

Coefficient
Void Ratio
0.05-0.01
0.5-0.25

0.25-0.1

0.1-0.05
Hole No.

<0.005
Lob. No.

Geology
20 - 10

5.0-2.0

2.0-1.0

1.0-0.5
10 - 5
70-40

40-20
>70
m mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm g/cm3 g/cm3 m/day
WL WP IP W IL Ic Gs(ρs) ρ ρd e Sr ｋ
21 0.5-0.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 3.1 16.7 15.8 6.7 21.8 8.2 27.4 29 13 17 18 0.3 0.69 2.71 2.02 1.71 0.58 0.83 - Clay loam, heavy pulverulent tight-
21 2-2.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.1 11.8 24.3 25.8 7 5.5 24.5 22 10 12 16 0.5 0.5 2.68 2.13 1.83 0.47 0.93 - Clay loam, light pulverulent tight-
21 14-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 2.3 11.7 16.1 26 15 28.7 33 19 14 10 -0.6 1.59 2.68 1.95 1.77 0.52 0.52 - Clay loam, heavy pulverulent solid

22 1.35-1.45 0 0 0 0 0 0.9 1.2 6.5 20.8 21.2 12.6 10.5 3.5 22.8 25 11 13 10 0.11 1.114 2.7 2.2 2 0.35 0.76 - Clay loam, heavy pulverulent solid
22 2-2.15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.4 11.1 17.2 16.1 14.8 5 33.4 25 10 15 11 0.05 0.945 2.72 2.17 1.95 0.39 0.77 - Clay loam, heavy pulverulent
22 2.9-3.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.9 4.4 8 20.2 20.6 8.3 37.6 34 12 22 19 0.31 0.693 2.72 2.05 1.73 0.57 0.89 - Clay, light pulverulent tight-plastic
22 3-3.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 3 11.8 21.4 19.8 17.5 5 21.1 23 10 13 17 0.52 0.484 2.72 2.11 1.8 0.51 0.9 - Clay loam, heavy pulverulent soft-
C-1-42

22 12-12.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0.8 6.4 12.7 38.4 9.4 31.9 37 20 17 21 0.05 0.952 2.76 2 1.65 0.67 0.88 - Clay loam, heavy pulverulent

23 4.5-5.5 0 0 0 0 1.3 5.9 3.4 8 12.4 2.9 5.7 17.9 9.4 33.1 31 13 18 22 0.48 0.514 2.72 - - - - - Clay, light pulverulent tight-plastic
23 6.8-7.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 2.9 3.7 4.4 24.2 15.3 49.1 36 15 20 21 0.28 0.718 2.74 2.08 1.72 0.59 0.97 - Clay, light pulverulent tight-plastic

24 10-10.2 0 0 0 0 0 1.6 0.7 1.9 10.9 14.6 6.9 15 11.2 37.2 31 12 19 22 0.49 0.497 2.72 2.07 1.7 0.6 0.88 - Clay, light pulverulent tight-plastic
24 12.5-12.7 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0.7 1.4 1.9 3.5 7.5 13.4 70.1 53 17 36 22 0.12 0.879 2.72 2.15 1.77 0.54 1.08 - Clay, heavy pulverulent semisolid

25 8-8.2 0 0 0 17.2 13.7 15 7.7 14.7 22.7 5.6 0.6 0.8 0.5 1.5 - - - 5 - - 2.72 - - - - 67.5 Coarse sand
25 10.15-10.5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0 0.4 0.8 4.1 10.9 27.5 16.3 39.4 46 25 22 37 0.59 0.405 2.72 1.85 1.35 1.02 1 - Clay, light pulverulent soft-plastic

26 6-6.25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 1.2 5.8 28.9 20.5 43.2 50 23 27 26 0.13 0.868 2.78 1.97 1.56 0.79 0.93 - Clay, heavy semisolid

27 5.0-6.0 0 0 0 7.7 17.4 26.7 10.5 16.2 15.6 2 0.5 1 0.7 1.7 - - - 4 - - 2.77 - - - - 39.8 Gravel sand
27 7.0-7.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 0.5 1.1 4.6 29.9 19.9 43.7 46 23 23 22 -0.02 1.017 2.78 2.03 1.66 0.67 0.92 - Clay, light pulverulent solid
27 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 2.9 5.5 33 21.5 36.8 41 22 19 19 -0.16 1.16 2.71 2.02 1.7 0.59 0.87 - Clay loam, heavy pulverulent solid

28 7.0-8.0 0 0 0 4 12.9 22.1 11.4 20 20.2 4.4 0.6 1.4 0.6 2.4 - - - 8 - - 2.74 - - - - 32.8 Gravel sand
28 9.2-9.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.8 5.8 10.1 27 17.6 38.7 44 20 24 23 0.13 0.869 2.77 1.95 1.58 0.75 0.97 - Clay, light pulverulent semisolid
Note: These data are obtained during this Study
" - " : not measured
 Annex A(3) Result of test for Physical Properties (STP)

Grain Size Plastisity % Solidity

(relative water content)

Natural Water Content

Degree of Saturation
Depth of Sampling

Consistency Index

Specific gravity
Plasticity Index

Liquidity Index

of Permeability
of soil particle
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limit

Wet Density

Dry Density

Coefficient
Void Ratio
0.1-0.005

0.25-0.05
Lob. No.

Geology
2.0-0.25

0.5-0.25

0.25-0.1
2.0-1.0

1.0-0.5

<0.05
70-40

40-20

20-10
>70
Hole

10-5

5-2
m mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm g/cm3 g/cm3 m/day
WL WP IP W IL Ic Gs(ρs) ρ ρd e Sr ｋ
565 10 1.1-1.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.3 0 0 0 0 0 43.3 36.3 22 14 8 13 -0.155 1.15 2.72 1.913 1.696 0.604 0.575 - light sandy clay
566 10 0.3-3.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
567 10 3.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 47.7 37.3 23 16 7 23 0.996 0.0 2.7 2.061 1.676 0.611 1.015 - arenaceous loamy sand
568 10 5.2-8.4 0 0 0 9.5 3.5 9.5 0 6 24.5 15.5 17 2.5 0 12 - - - - - - - - - - - 2.41 coarse sand
569 10 8.5-11.8 0 0 0 6.5 11.5 27 0 11 17.5 8 8 1.5 0 9 - - - - - - - - - - - 3.09 gravelly sand
570 10 17.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 18.3 74.7 58 27 31 30 0.098 0.903 2.74 1.878 1.444 0.897 0.917 - heavy clay

572 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 30 58 25 16 9 17 0.111 0.889 2.72 1.847 1.579 0.723 0.6395 - light sandy clay
573 11 0.3-3.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - -
574 11 4.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 50.3 29.7 20 16 4 18 0.481 0.525 2.7 2.283 1.936 0.395 1.226 - arenaceous loamy sand
575 11 4.0-6.0 0 0 0 0 0.5 2 0 2 22.5 36 19.5 2 0 15.5 - - - - - - - - - - - 1.75 average coarseness sand
576 11 6.0-8.8 0 0 0 2 3.5 13.5 0 4.5 18.5 19.5 22.5 3 0 13 - - - - - - - - - - - 1.82 light gravelly dusty sandy clay
C-1-43

577 11 8.8-9.3 0 0 0 0 8.5 20.3 22.1 0 0 0 0 0 9.4 39.7 28 16 12 17 0.06 0.942 2.72 2.121 1.817 0.497 0.9149 - light gravelly dusty sandy clay
578 11 9.3-11.0 0 0 0 3.5 8.5 17 0 6.5 16.5 18 17.5 1.5 0 11 - - - - - - - - - - - 1.01 gravelly sand
579 11 12.5 0 0 0 0 6.7 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 43 29.3 19 12 7 12 0.05 0.943 2.7 2.214 1.97 0.37 0.9003 - light sandy clay
580 11 15.0-15.2 0 0 0 0 1 3.2 13.1 0 0 0 0 0 32.1 50.6 20 14 6 13 -0.161 1.167 2.7 2.181 1.93 0.399 0.8816 - dust sandy loam

588 12 1.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.3 0 0 0 0 0 51 38.7 25 18 7 14 -0.603 1.6 2.7 1.818 1.598 0.69 0.5393 - arenaceous loamy sand
589 12 3.0-3.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 43.7 51.3 26 18 8 22 0.497 0.5 2.72 2.034 1.668 0.631 0.9473 - light sandy clay
590 12 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.7 0 0 0 0 0 22.7 73.7 25 15 10 24 0.92 0.08 2.72 2.022 1.628 0.671 0.9811 - light gravelly dusty sand clay
591 12 6.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.3 0 0 0 0 0 22.3 72.3 27 15 12 28 1.049 -0.05 2.72 2.005 1.572 0.731 1.027 -
592 12 4.4-6.0 0 0 0 6 8.5 20.1 0 8.1 17.6 9.5 12.4 3.6 0 14.3 - - - - - - - - - - - - gravelly sand
593 12 7.0-9.5 0 0 0 0 2.1 23.1 0 13.5 29.3 10.8 8.8 4.7 0 7.7 - - - - - - - - - - - 8.97
594 12 9.5-11.5 0 0 0 0 3 26 0 17.6 25.7 8.6 7.6 2.9 0 8.6 - - - - - - - - - - - -
595 12 15 0 0 0 0 3.1 6.1 12.4 0 0 0 0 0 15.9 62.5 45 27 18 24 -0.169 1.167 2.74 1.936 1.562 0.754 0.8704 - light dusty clay

596 13 1.3-1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.1 0 0 0 0 0 46.4 39.5 23 15 8 18 0.311 0.688 2.72 2.137 1.818 0.496 0.9595 - light sandy clay
597 13 4.5-4.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.3 0 0 0 0 0 42 47.7 20 15 5 21 1.132 -0.14 2.7 2.004 1.661 0.626 0.8918 - arenaceous loamy sand
598 13 5.5 0 0 0 0 3.9 10.1 0 9 38.4 15.9 11 3.6 0 8.1 - - - - - - - - - - - - coarse sand
599 13 7.6-10.2 0 0 0 0 8.4 25.4 0 11.5 20.7 12.5 10.7 3.2 0 7.6 - - - - - - - - - - - - gravelly sand
600 13 12.5 0 0 0 0 0 6.4 10 0 0 0 0 0 26.6 57 43 25 18 21 -0.23 1.228 2.74 2.059 1.703 0.609 0.9393 - light dusty clay
Note: These data are obtained during the Feasibility Study
" - " : not measured
 Annex A(3) Result of test for Physical Properties (STP)

Grain Size Plastisity % Solidity

(relative water content)

Natural Water Content

Degree of Saturation
Depth of Sampling

Consistency Index

Specific gravity
Plasticity Index

Liquidity Index

of Permeability
of soil particle
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limit

Wet Density

Dry Density

Coefficient
Void Ratio
0.1-0.005

0.25-0.05
Lob. No.

Geology
2.0-0.25

0.5-0.25

0.25-0.1
2.0-1.0

1.0-0.5

<0.05
70-40

40-20

20-10
>70
Hole

10-5

5-2
m mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm g/cm3 g/cm3 m/day
WL WP IP W IL Ic Gs(ρs) ρ ρd e Sr ｋ
602 14 1.8-2.0 0 0 0 0 9.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 46.3 44.3 24 15 9 18 0.344 0.656 2.72 2.14 1.812 0.501 0.9829 - light sandy clay
603 14 2 0 0 0 0 13.30 0 0 0 0 0 36 50.7 15 15 10 19 0.384 -0.38 2.72 2.098 1.766 0.541 0.9478 -
604 14 0.0-3.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
605 14 4.6-4.7 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 52.3 38.7 20 15 5 23 1.653 -0.66 2.7 2.11 1.712 0.577 1.088 - arenaceous loamy sand
606 14 7.0-11.0 0 0 2.4 11.9 32.2 0 8.7 16.8 9 7.8 3 0 8.2 - - - - - - - - - - - 1.41 gravelly sand
607 14 15 0 0 0 0 4.3 13.7 0 0 0 0 0 22.7 59.3 45 29 16 26 -0.189 1.188 2.73 1.937 1.537 0.776 0.9142 - heavy dusty sandy clay

608 15 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 42.7 49.3 29 18 11 23 0.413 0.591 2.72 2.049 1.672 0.626 0.9787 - light sandy clay
609 15 0.0-3.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
610 15 3.5-4.5 0 0 0 2.3 2 0 1.1 9.9 38.7 31.4 2.9 0 11.7 - - - - - - - - - - - 2.07 average caarseness sand
611 15 4.5-5-5 0 0 0 0 10.9 0 6.6 24.4 23 23.5 3.8 0 7.8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
C-1-44

612 15 5.5-8.0 0 0 1.5 4.3 26.9 0 13.1 24.7 13.2 10.3 2.5 0 3.5 - - - - - - - - - - - - gravelly sand
613 15 8.0-10.3 0 0 0 5.9 25.5 0 12.5 27.2 13.7 10.2 2.8 0 2.2 - - - - - - - - - - - 14.3
614 15 12 0 0 0 0 0 5.7 0 0 0 0 0 20.7 73.7 26 13 13 13 -0.012 1.015 2.73 2.267 2.009 0.359 0.9776 - heavy dusty sandy clay
615 15 18 0 0 0 0 0 3.3 0 0 0 0 0 13.3 83.3 65 35 30 30 -0.172 1.173 2.74 1.89 1.456 0.882 0.9268 - heavy clay

616 16 3.2 0 0 0 0 0 7.3 0 0 0 0 0 54.3 38.3 20 15 5 22 1.353 -0.36 2.7 2.163 1.777 0.52 1.13 - arenaceous loamy sand
617 16 4.5-5.8 0 0 0 2.2 7.5 0 4.8 16.2 19.3 22.2 6.3 0 21.5 - - - - - - - - - - - - fine sand
618 16 5.8-8.0 0 0 5.6 11.7 18.2 0 8.4 21.8 15.7 10.9 2.9 0 4.7 - - - - - - - - - - - - gravelly sand
619 16 8.0-10.2 0 0 3.8 14.3 34.7 0 8.7 10.5 7.9 8 6.2 0 5.9 - - - - - - - - - - - - gravel soil
620 16 15 0 0 0 0 0 4.7 0 0 0 0 0 19.3 76 65 33 32 40 0.209 0.791 2.74 1.895 1.356 1.02 1.066 - heavy clay
Note: These data are obtained during the Feasibility Study
" - " : not measured
 Annex A(4) Result of test for Physical Properties (STP)

Grain Size Plastisity % Solidity

(relative water content)

Natural Water Content

Degree of Saturation
Depth of Sampling

Consistency Index

Specific gravity
Plasticity Index

Liquidity Index

of Permeability
of soil particle
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limit

Wet Density

Dry Density

Coefficient
Void Ratio
0.01-0.005
0.05-0.01
Lob. No.

Geology
0.5-0.25

0.25-0.1

0.1-0.05

<0.005
20 - 10

5.0-2.0

2.0-1.0

1.0-0.5
70-40

40-20

10 - 5
>70
Hole

m mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm g/cm3 g/cm3 m/day

WL WP IP W IL Ic Gs(ρs) ρ ρd e Sr ｋ
29 10-11 0 0 0 6.4 14.3 31.1 12.5 12.8 12.7 6.3 0.1 1 0.7 2.1 - - - 4 - - 2.68 - - - - 58.2 Gravel sand
29 14-14.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 0.2 0.5 3.9 15.6 17.1 62.4 51 21 30 27 0.21 0.789 2.74 1.98 1.56 0.76 0.98 - Clay heavy semisolid

30 8.0-9.0 0 0 0 6.2 10.3 25 13.8 21.6 18.8 2.8 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.3 - - - 3 - - 2.7 - - - - 57.8 Gravel sand
30 12-12.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 3.1 14.1 14.9 66.8 50 21 30 26 0.18 0.819 2.7 1.99 1.58 0.71 0.99 - Clay, heavy semisolid

31 7.0-8.0 0 0 0 6.4 11.4 21.5 12.2 24.8 19.3 3.1 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.4 - - - 4 - - 2.7 - - - - 45.6 Gravel sand
31 13-13.2 0 0 0 0 0.3 0.8 0.5 0.8 1.2 1.2 7.3 5.3 13.5 69.1 53 19 33 23 0.11 0.892 2.73 2.07 1.68 0.63 0.99 - Clay, heavy semisolid

32 9.0-10.0 0 0 0 6.9 10.7 21.8 12.3 21.6 19.2 3.4 1.3 0.3 0.6 1.9 - - - 3 - - 2.7 - - - - 39.2 Gravel sand
32 12.5-12.7 0 0 0 0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.6 4.2 20.7 9.2 62.8 51 20 31 27 0.22 0.785 2.72 1.98 1.56 0.74 0.99 - Clay, heavy pulverulent semisolid

33 8.0-9.0 0 0 0 7.9 12.4 29.4 15 20.7 10.2 3.2 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.4 - - - 3 - - 2.68 - - - - 65.7 Gravel sand
33 12-12.2 0 0 0 0 0.4 2.2 0.6 1.4 8.9 4.9 5.5 9.8 7 59.3 57 22 35 32 0.29 0.71 2.68 1.92 1.46 0.84 1.02 - Clay, heavy pulverulent tight-

34 6.4-7.0 0 0 0 8 12.5 14.9 9.6 25 24.3 4.3 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.6 - - - 9 - - 2.7 - - - - 33.9 Coarse sand
C-1-45

34 10.2-10.4 0 0 0 0 0 0.9 0.8 2.6 5 8.9 9.5 25.8 14.2 32.3 35 20 15 25 0.3 0.693 2.73 1.97 1.58 0.73 0.92 - Clay loam, light pulverulent tight-

35 5.3-6.3 0 0 0 4.7 12.5 25.7 15.4 21.8 10.7 3.6 0.7 2 0.7 2.2 - - - 12 - - 2.71 - - - - 48.2 Gravel sand
35 7.0-8.0 0 0 0 0 2.1 1.1 0.8 3 16.9 22.5 10.1 23.5 5.9 14.1 27 14 13 13 0.08 1.079 2.69 2.17 1.92 0.4 0.87 - Clay loam, light pulverulent
Note: These data are obtained during this Study
" - " : not measured
 Annex A(5) Result of Test for Physical Properties (Water Intake)

Grain Size Plastisity % Solidity

(relative water content)

Natural Water Content

Degree of Saturation
Depth of Sampling

Consistency Index

Specific gravity
Plasticity Index

Liquidity Index

of Permeability
of soil particle
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limit

Wet Density

Dry Density

Coefficient
Void Ratio
0.1-0.005

0.25-0.05
Lob. No.

Geology
2.0-0.25

0.5-0.25

0.25-0.1
2.0-1.0

1.0-0.5

<0.05
70-40

40-20

20-10
>70
Hole

10-5

5-2
m mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm g/cm3 g/cm3 m/day
WL WP IP W IL Ic Gs(ρs) ρ ρd e Sr ｋ
531 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.7 0 0 0 0 0 25.3 57 40 25 15 21.3 -0.25 1.247 2.73 1.706 1.407 0.94 0.617 - heavy dusty sandy clay
532 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.7 0 0 0 0 0 34.3 50 36 24 12 18 -0.501 1.5 2.72 1.774 1.504 0.809 0.6046 - light sandy clay
534 7 0.3-3.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.7 0 0 0 0 0 44 51.3 32 20 12 18.4 -0.137 1.133 2.72 1.675 1.415 0.922 0.5417 -
535 7 4.5-5.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 33.3 52.7 31 20 11 28.4 0.762 0.236 2.72 2.019 1.572 0.73 1.058 -
536 7 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 31 54 33 19 14 25.3 0.449 0.55 2.73 2.062 1.646 0.658 1.048 - heavy sandy clay
537 7 9.0-9.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.7 0 0 0 0 0 15.7 79.7 33 20 13 25.3 0.411 0.592 2.73 2.076 1.656 0.649 1.066 - heavy dusty sandy clay
538 7 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.3 0 0 0 0 0 16.3 77.3 32 19 13 28.7 0.745 0.254 2.73 2.047 1.591 0.716 1.093 -
539 7 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.7 0 0 0 0 0 11 86.3 33 20 13 26.2 0.48 0.523 2.73 2.034 1.611 0.695 1.031 -
540 7 15.8-16.8 0 0 0 4.2 1.6 2.9 16.8 0 0 0 0 0 24.8 49.8 24 17 7 17.5 0.067 0.929 2.7 2.168 1.846 0.463 1.019 - dust sandy loam

541 8 0.6-0.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.7 0 0 0 0 0 36.3 50 34 20 14 16 -0.286 1.286 2.73 1.832 1.58 0.728 0.5996 - heavy sandy clay
542 8 1.4-1.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 31.7 55.3 35 20 15 18.7 -0.086 1.087 2.73 1.894 1.595 0.711 0.7183 -
544 8 4.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.3 0 0 0 0 0 32.7 54 36 19 17 23.2 0.246 0.753 2.73 2.066 1.677 0.628 1.008 -
545 8 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 30 55 35 20 15 27.3 0.488 0.513 2.73 2.02 1.586 0.721 1.035 -
546 8 12.0-12.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.7 0 0 0 0 0 32.7 53.7 36 23 13 27.6 0.351 0.646 2.73 2.013 1.578 0.73 1.031 -
547 8 13.5-14.3 0 0 0 0 0 2.3 24.4 0 0 0 0 0 27.7 45.6 21 16 5 21.6 1.114 -0.12 2.7 2.099 1.727 0.564 1.033 - dust sandy clay
C-1-46

549 9 3.2-3.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 26.7 63.3 31 20 11 25.6 0.512 0.491 2.72 2.011 1.601 0.699 0.9972 - light dusty sandy clay
550 9 6.0-6.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 23 68 33 20 13 21.3 0.1 0.9 2.73 2.105 1.735 0.573 1.014 - heavy dusty sandy clay
551 9 9.0-9.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4.7 92.3 30 18 12 23.3 0.442 0.558 2.72 2.097 1.7 0.6 1.057 - light dusty sandy clay
552 9 13.7-13.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.3 0 0 0 0 0 6.7 90 31 19 12 24.2 0.432 0.567 2.72 2.082 1.676 0.622 1.057 -
553 9 15 0 0 0 0 3.7 2.8 19 0 0 0 0 0 29 45.6 21 14 7 15.3 0.193 0.814 2.7 2.077 1.801 0.499 0.8298 - dust sandy clay
Note: These data are obtained during the Feasibility Study
" - " : not measured
 Annex A(6) Result of test for Physical Properties (Water Intake)

Grain Size Plastisity % Solidity

(relative water content)

Natural Water Content

Degree of Saturation
Depth of Sampling

Consistency Index

Specific gravity
Plasticity Index

Liquidity Index

of Permeability
of soil particle
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limit

Wet Density

Dry Density

Coefficient
Void Ratio
0.01-0.005
0.05-0.01
Lob. No.

Geology
0.5-0.25

0.25-0.1

0.1-0.05

<0.005
20 - 10

5.0-2.0

2.0-1.0

1.0-0.5
70-40

40-20

10 - 5
>70
Hole

m mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm g/cm3 g/cm3 m/day

WL WP IP W IL Ic Gs(ρs) ρ ρd e Sr ｋ
36 0-3.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 12.5 52.5 9.5 3 7.4 2.8 11.8 17.5 12.3 5.2 15.7 0.65 0.346 2.67 2.14 1.85 0.44 0.95 - Loam, dusty plastic
36 5-5.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.1 5.8 9.6 5.6 16.6 13.3 48 38.2 15.8 22.4 20.6 0.21 0.786 2.68 2.10 1.74 0.54 1.02 - Clay, light, dusty, semi-hard
36 8-8.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0.1 1.2 3.5 12.4 40.2 9.1 33.4 29.3 13.6 15.7 24.1 0.67 0.331 2.68 2.03 1.64 0.63 1.03 - Loam, heavy dusty, softy plastic
36 9-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.1 4.2 14.1 12.9 9.5 8.6 9.7 39.9 31.0 13.6 17.4 25.2 0.67 0.333 2.69 2.07 1.65 0.63 1.08 - Loam, heavy, dusty, softly plastic
36 12-14 0 0 0 0 1.2 3.7 5.3 20.7 30.2 9.1 4.1 8.1 4 13.6 19.0 9.7 9.3 15.2 0.59 0.409 2.67 2.09 1.81 0.48 0.85 - Loam, light,dusty softly plastic

37 1.2-1.35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 1.6 6.5 8.5 8 13.2 11.8 50 41.6 17.8 23.8 27.2 0.39 0.605 2.71 1.98 1.56 0.74 1.00 - Clay, light, dusty
37 3.2-3.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 1.6 6.1 11.4 9.7 14 5.8 51 36.1 14.1 22.0 21.9 0.35 0.645 2.71 2.09 1.71 0.58 1.02 - Clay, light, dusty
37 6.0-12.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 2.7 5.4 15.9 32 11.6 32 28.0 12.6 15.4 25.3 0.82 0.175 2.7 2.02 1.61 0.68 1.00 - Loam heavy dusty fluid plastic
37 12.7-14.6 0 0 0 1.5 8.4 18 9.2 21.3 19.7 5.9 2 5.4 3 5.6 15.9 8.6 7.3 12.4 0.52 0.479 2.68 2.15 1.91 0.4 0.83 - Loam, light, arenaceous softly plastic

Note: These data are obtained during this Study

" - " : not measured
C-1-47
 Annex A(7) Result of test for Physical Properties (Ishym River)

Grain Size Plastisity % Solidity

(relative water content)

Natural Water Content

Degree of Saturation
Depth of Sampling

Consistency Index

Specific gravity
Plasticity Index

Liquidity Index

of Permeability
of soil particle
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limit

Wet Density

Dry Density

Coefficient
Void Ratio
0.01-0.005
0.05-0.01
Lob. No.

Geology
0.5-0.25

0.25-0.1

0.1-0.05

<0.005
20 - 10

5.0-2.0

2.0-1.0

1.0-0.5
70-40

40-20

10 - 5
>70
Hole

m mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm g/cm3 g/cm3 m/day

WL WP IP W IL Ic Gs(ρs) ρ ρd e Sr ｋ
34 6.4-7.0 0 0 0 8 12.5 14.9 9.6 25 24.3 4.3 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.6 - - - 9 - - 2.7 - - - - 33.9 Coarse sand
34 10.2-10.4 0 0 0 0 0 0.9 0.8 2.6 5 8.9 9.5 25.8 14.2 32.3 35 20 15 25 0.3 0.693 2.73 1.97 1.58 0.73 0.92 - Clay loam, light pulverulent tight-

35 5.3-6.3 0 0 0 4.7 12.5 25.7 15.4 21.8 10.7 3.6 0.7 2 0.7 2.2 - - - 12 - - 2.71 - - - - 48.2 Gravel sand
35 7.0-8.0 0 0 0 0 2.1 1.1 0.8 3 16.9 22.5 10.1 23.5 5.9 14.1 27 14 13 13 0.08 1.079 2.69 2.17 1.92 0.4 0.87 - Clay loam, light pulverulent
Note: These data are obtained during this Study
" - " : not measured
C-1-48
 Annex A(8) Result of Test for Physical Properties (Along the Ishym River)

Grain Size Plastisity % Solidity

(relative water content)

Natural Water Content

Degree of Saturation
Depth of Sampling

Consistency Index

Specific gravity
Plasticity Index

Liquidity Index

of Permeability
of soil particle
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limit

Wet Density

Dry Density

Coefficient
Void Ratio
0.1-0.005

0.25-0.05
Lob. No.

Geology
2.0-0.25

0.5-0.25

0.25-0.1
2.0-1.0

1.0-0.5
70-40

40-20

20-10

<0.05
Hole

10-5
>70

5-2
m mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm g/cm3 g/cm3 m/day
WL WP IP W IL Ic Gs(ρs) ρ ρd e Sr ｋ
631 19 1.5 3.7 - - - - - 17 79.3 32 19 13 20 0.077 0.923 2.73 1.883 1.569 0.739 0.7367 - Sandy Clay, heavy, dusty
632 19 0.3-3.0
633 19 4.5-6.0 1.4 1.2 - 1.2 9.8 22 43.3 3 0 18.1 1.97 Sand, fine grained
634 19 6.0-8.0 2.4 12.2 20.9 - 9 22.6 12.4 13.7 1.2 0 5.7 Sand, coarse grained
635 19 8.0-10.4 3.8 10.7 22.3 - 8.1 21.3 13.3 11.7 1.9 0 7.2

636 20 3 3.3 - - - - - 32 64.7 25 18 7 19.6 0.229 0.771 2.70 1.86 1.554 0.737 0.720 Sandy Loam, dusty
637 20 6.7-8.5 2 5.3 16.9 - 8.1 23.8 15.3 15.8 2.7 0 10.3 Sand, coarse grained
638 20 8.5-10.4 3 2.8 7.3 - 6.4 24.4 22 21.3 2.2 0 10.8 2.3 Sand, average coarseness
Note: These data are obtained during the Feasibility Study
" - " : not measured
C-1-49
Annex B Result of Test for Mechanical Properties
Well No. Coefficient of Angle of
Facility

lateral internal

Layer
Interval of Cohesion Deformation Module
sampling, m pressure friction
β φ S, MPa kgf/cm2 tonf/m2 Е, МPа kgf/cm2
21 0.5 - 0.7 1 0.15 25 0.02 0.20 2.04 5.5 56
22 1.35 - 1.45 1 0.2 22 0.04 0.41 4.08 5.9 60
22 2 - 2.15 1 0.15 15 0.05 0.51 5.10 5.9 60
22 2.9 - 3.1 1 0.24 28 0.04 0.41 4.08 5.2 53
22 3 - 3.3 1 0.23 20 0.06 0.61 6.12 4.8 49
Average 0.19 22 0.04 0.43 4.28 5.5 56
Water Treatment Plant

23 6.8 - 7 5 0.2 12 0.08 0.82 8.16 4.8 49

24 10 - 10.2 5 0.1 10 0.06 0.61 6.12 5.5 56
27 7 - 7.2 5 0.12 30 0.06 0.61 6.12 2.2 22
27 12 -12.2 5 0.2 23 0.08 0.82 8.16 12.3 125
Average 0.16 19 0.07 0.71 7.14 6.2 63
21 14 - 15 6 0.2 29 0.07 0.71 7.14 8.6 88
22 12 - 12.2 6 0.1 16 0.06 0.61 6.12 4.6 47
24 12.5 - 12.7 6 0.15 29 0.04 0.41 4.08 10.1 103
25 10.15 - 10.5 6 0.17 18 0.03 0.31 3.06 3.8 39
26 6 - 6.25 6 0.1 24 0.05 0.51 5.10 6.9 70
28 9.2 - 9.6 6 0.1 25 0.09 0.92 9.18 4.1 42
Average 0.14 24 0.06 0.58 5.78 6.4 65
29 14 - 14.2 6 0.16 24 0.08 0.82 8.16 6.7 68
Treatment Plant

30 12 - 12.2 6 0.1 15 0.09 0.92 9.18 3.1 32

Sewerage

31 13 - 13.2 6 0.1 14 0.06 0.61 6.12 4.6 47

32 12.5 - 12.7 6 0.12 15 0.08 0.82 8.16 5.9 60
33 12 - 12.2 6 0.2 24 0.03 0.31 3.06 5.5 56
Average 0.14 18 0.07 0.69 6.93 5.2 53
34 10.2 - 10.4 4 0.16 26 0.04 0.41 4.08 4.8 49
Ishym
River

35 7-8 4 0.1 19 0.11 1.12 11.22 11.2 114

Average 0.13 23 0.08 0.76 7.65 8.0 82
36 0 - 3.2 1 0.2 33 0.09 0.92 9.18 3.9 40
36 5 - 5.2 1 0.2 10 0.1 1.02 10.20 11 112
36 8 - 8.2 1 0.1 22 0.04 0.41 4.08 3.4 35
36 9.0 - 12.0 1 0.16 14 0.07 3.1 32
Water Intake Tower

0.71 7.14
37 3.2 - 3.4 1 0.15 10 0.07 0.71 7.14 2.9 30
37 6.0 - 12.7 1 0.23 --- 0.09 0.92 9.18 2.6 27
Average 0.17 18 0.08 0.78 7.82 4.48 46
37 1.2 - 1.35 2 0.16 9 0.06 0.61 6.12 2.5 25
0.16 9 0.06 0.61 6.12 2.5 25
36 12.0 - 14.0 3 0.18 29 0.04 0.41 4.08 3.6 37
37 12.7 - 14.6 3 0.2 27 0.1 1.02 10.20 3.6 37
Average 0.19 28 0.07 0.71 7.14 3.6 37

C-1-50
 Annex C Results of Chemical Analysis of Soil Moisture (2/7)

Contents %

Boring No.

Formation
Ion Content note about
Sampling easily Content mg/kg
Facility Lab pH %/m・mol/100g of soil salting level aggressivity absense
Interval (m) dissolving Gypsum Total
or aggression factor
CO3 HCO3 Cl SO4 Ca Mg Na Salt chlorides sulphates
476 1 1 1-2.7 - 0.00 0.08 0.01 0.07 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.18 -0.01 0.17 Non-saline 310 672 SO4
0.00 1.34 0.40 1.40 0.60 1.25 1.29
480 1 2 6-6.5 - 0.00 0.05 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.1 0.06 0.16 Non-saline 221 288 not aggressive
0.00 0.88 0.42 0.60 0.65 0.90 0.35
489 2 1 1-1.7 - 0.00 0.12 0.04 0.07 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.24 -0.01 0.23 Non-saline 538 704 Cl, SO4
0.00 1.90 1.02 1.47 0.45 1.75 2.19
496 3 1 0-1.5 - 0.00 0.03 0.01 0.06 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.01 0.13 Non-saline 265 576 SO4
0.00 0.44 0.34 1.20 0.85 0.55 0.58
497 3 1 1.5-2.2 - 0.00 0.03 0.01 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.03 0.14 Non-saline 262 480 not aggressive
0.00 0.52 0.40 1.00 0.60 0.85 0.47
509 4 1 0-2.6 - 0.00 0.03 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.05 0.16 Non-saline 308 352 not aggressive
0.00 0.56 0.62 0.73 0.80 0.75 0.36
517 5 1 0.3-3.0 - 0.00 0.04 0.01 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.13 0.02 0.15 Non-saline 270 512 SO4
0.00 0.72 0.40 1.07 0.50 0.45 1.24
523 6 1 1-1.2 - 0.00 0.11 0.04 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.23 0.02 0.25 Non-saline 541 544 Cl, SO4
C-1-51

Water Treatment Plant

0.00 1.78 1.14 1.13 0.70 0.50 2.85

BD 21 1 0.5-0.7 9.2 0.03 0.12 0.03 0.09 0.01 0.00 0.10 0.32 0 0.38 Non-saline 273 878
1.10 1.10 0.77 1.83 0.40 4.20
BD 21 1 1.0-2.5 8.5 0.01 0.07 0.004 0.04 0.004 0.00 0.04 0.15 0 0.17 Non-saline 36 384
0.44 1.10 0.10 0.80 0.20 1.76
BD 21 6 14-15 8.2 0.01 0.05 0.014 0.015 0.002 0.00 0.032 0.10 0 0.12 Non-saline 138 148
0.22 0.77 0.39 0.31 0.10 1.40
BD 22 1 1.35-1.45 8.3 0.00 0.054 0.021 0.057 0.012 0.00 0.047 0.142 0 0.191 Non-saline 206 571
0.88 0.58 1.19 0.60 2.05
BD 22 1 2-2.15 8.9 0.015 0.034 0.009 0.113 0.03 0.00 0.042 0.127 0.06 0.238 Non-saline 85 1132
0.22 0.55 0.24 2.36 1.50 1.82
BD 22 1 2.9-3.1 9.0 0.00 0.027 0.007 0.092 0.014 0.005 0.033 0.138 0.018 0.178 Non-saline 67 917
0.44 0.19 1.91 0.70 0.40 1.43
BD 22 2 3.1-3.3 8.7 0.00 0.027 0.007 0.048 0.014 0.006 0.007 0.055 0.017 0.109 Non-saline 67 485
0.44 0.19 1.01 0.70 0.50 0.31
BD 22 6 12-12.2 8.3 0.00 0.034 0.009 0.012 0.004 0.000 0.019 0.062 0 0.078 Non-saline 85 125
0.55 0.24 0.26 0.20 0.84
BD 23 2 4.5-5.5 8.1 0.00 0.040 0.017 0.122 0.006 0.002 0.072 0.235 0 0.259 Non-saline 170 1219
0.66 0.48 2.54 0.30 0.20 3.14
BD 23 5 6.8-7.0 8.3 0.00 0.047 0.026 0.015 0.006 0.002 0.029 0.09 0 0.125 Non-saline 256 154
0.77 0.72 0.32 0.30 0.20 1.27
BD 24 5 10-10.2 7.8 0.00 0.020 0.004 0.024 0.006 0.001 0.012 0.042 0 0.067 Non-saline 36 240
 Annex C Results of Chemical Analysis of Soil Moisture (3/7)

Contents %

Boring No.

Formation
Ion Content note about
Sampling easily Content mg/kg
Facility Lab pH %/m・mol/100g of soil salting level aggressivity absense
Interval (m) dissolving Gypsum Total
or aggression factor
CO3 HCO3 Cl SO4 Ca Mg Na Salt chlorides sulphates
0.33 0.10 0.50 0.30 0.10 0.51
BD 24 6 12.5-12.7 8.2 0.00 0.040 0.007 0.020 0.008 0.000 0.020 0.047 0 0.095 Non-saline 71 197
0.64 0.20 0.41 0.40 0.87
BD 25 4 8.0-8.2 7.6 0.00 0.020 0.002 0.015 0.008 0.001 0.004 0.018 0.004 0.049 Non-saline 18 149
0.33 0.05 0.31 0.40 0.10 0.19
Water Treatment Plant

BD 25 6 10.15-10.5 8.1 0.004 0.034 0.017 0.015 0.006 0.001 0.025 0.078 0 0.102 Non-saline 170 154
0.13 0.55 0.48 0.32 0.30 0.10 1.08
BD 26 6 6-6.25 7.6 0.00 0.013 0.014 0.036 0.010 0.002 0.013 0.048 0.02 0.088 Non-saline 138 365
0.22 0.39 0.76 0.50 0.20 0.57
BD 27 4 5.0-6.0 8.2 0.004 0.027 0.005 0.005 0.006 0.001 0.009 0.033 0 0.057 Non-saline 50 53
0.12 0.44 0.14 0.11 0.30 0.10 0.39
BD 27 5 7-7.2 8.1 0.003 0.020 0.009 0.017 0.004 0.002 0.014 0.053 0 0.069 Non-saline 85 173
0.10 0.33 0.24 0.36 0.20 0.20 0.62
BD 28 5 7.0-8.0 8.1 0.00 0.040 0.014 0.050 0.010 0.001 0.013 0.07 0 0.083 Non-saline 138 48
0.66 0.39 0.10 0.50 0.10 0.55
BD 28 6 9.2-9.6 7.9 0.00 0.020 0.009 0.012 0.008 0.001 0.007 0.03 0 0.057 Non-saline 85 125
C-1-52
 Annex C Results of Chemical Analysis of Soil Moisture (4/7)

Contents %

Boring No.

Formation
Ion Content note about
Sampling easily Content mg/kg
Facility Lab pH %/m・mol/100g of soil salting level aggressivity absense
Interval (m) dissolving Gypsum Total
or aggression factor
CO3 HCO3 Cl SO4 Ca Mg Na Salt chlorides sulphates
566 10 1 1.1-1.3 - 0.00 0.05 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.07 0.18 Non-saline 298 256 not aggressive
0.00 0.74 0.66 0.53 0.70 0.65 0.58
573 11 1 0.3-3.0 - 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.09 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.19 -0.04 0.15 Non-saline 507 864 Cl, SO4
0.00 0.54 0.82 1.80 1.35 0.70 1.11
604 14 0 0-0.3 - 0.00 0.09 0.07 0.31 0.02 0.01 0.18 0.64 -0.44 0.2 Non-saline 1486 3104 Cl, SO4
0.00 1.46 2.00 6.47 1.00 1.00 7.93
609 15 0 0-0.3 - 0.00 0.04 0.06 0.31 0.01 0.01 0.16 0.57 -0.44 0.13 Non-saline 1336 3072 Cl, SO4
WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT

0.00 0.60 1.60 6.40 0.50 1.00 7.10

BD 29 4 10.0-11.0 8 0.00 0.020 0.002 0.043 0.014 0.004 0.006 0.037 0.025 0.089 Non-saline 18 398
0.33 0.05 0.83 0.70 0.30 0.27
BD 29 6 14-14.2 7.6 0.00 0.013 0.046 0.038 0.008 0.005 0.035 0.115 0.013 0.145 Non-saline 461.5 384
0.22 1.30 0.80 0.40 0.40 1.53
BD 30 4 8.0-9.0 7.6 0.003 0.027 0.010 0.015 0.006 0.000 0.019 0.06 0 0.08 Non-saline 103 163
0.10 0.44 0.29 0.31 0.30 0.84
BD 30 6 12-12.2 7.2 0.00 0.020 0.055 0.043 0.006 0.001 0.054 0.055 0 0.179 Non-saline 547 427
0.33 1.54 0.89 0.30 0.10 2.36
BD 31 4 7.0-8.0 7.6 0.00 0.027 0.009 0.017 0.006 0.000 0.019 0.054 0 0.078 Non-saline 85 173
0.44 0.24 0.36 0.30 0.84
C-1-53

BD 31 6 13-13.2 8 0.00 0.013 0.033 0.028 0.006 0.000 0.032 0.089 0 0.112 Non-saline 326.6 378
0.22 0.92 0.58 0.30 1.43
BD 32 4 9.0-10.0 8.5 0.01 0.027 0.007 0.031 0.006 0.001 0.018 0.068 0 0.091 Non-saline 67 307
0.22 0.44 0.19 0.64 0.30 0.10 0.77
BD 32 6 12.5-12.7 8 0.00 0.013 0.041 0.021 0.002 0.001 0.004 0.11 0 0.118 Non-saline 412 211
0.22 1.16 0.44 0.10 0.10 1.74
BD 33 4 8.0-9.0 8 0.00 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.01 0 0.034 Non-saline 18 38
0.33 0.05 0.08 0.30 0.10 0.06
BD 33 6 12-12.2 8 0.00 0.027 0.034 0.009 0.002 0.002 0.030 0.096 0 0.104 Non-saline 341 91
 Annex C Results of Chemical Analysis of Soil Moisture (5/7)

Contents %

Boring No.

Formation
Ion Content note about
Sampling easily Content mg/kg
Facility Lab pH %/m・mol/100g of soil salting level aggressivity absense
Interval (m) dissolving Gypsum Total
or aggression factor
CO3 HCO3 Cl SO4 Ca Mg Na Salt chlorides sulphates
533 7 1 0.3-3.0 - 0.00 0.08 0.01 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.05 0.18 Non-saline 195 384 not aggressive
0.00 1.38 0.28 0.80 1.10 0.90 0.46
543 8 1 0-4.5 - 0.00 0.05 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.06 0.15 Non-saline 171 288 not aggressive
0.00 0.80 0.28 0.60 0.40 0.65 0.63
548 9 1 0-3.0 - 0.00 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.1 0.05 0.15 Non-saline 203 384 not aggressive
0.00 0.64 0.30 0.80 0.55 0.40 0.79
BD 36 1 0-3.2 7.8 0.00 0.018 0.0017 0.017 0.010 0.0012 0.0025 0.013 0 0.0504 Non-saline 17 171
0.30 0.048 0.356 0.50 0.10 0.409
BD 36 1 5-5.2 8.1 0.00 0.037 0.0034 0.026 0.0178 0.0037 0.001 0.0373 0 0.157 Non-saline 34 256
Water Intake Tower

0.60 0.097 0.533 0.89 0.30 0.042

BD 36 1 8-8.2 8.1 0.00 0.031 0.005 0.0071 0.008 0.0024 0.0045 0.0178 0 0.058 Non-saline 51 71
0.50 0.145 0.147 0.40 0.20 0.196
BD 36 1 9.0-12 8.1 0.00 0.043 0.0017 0.0021 0.0100 0.0037 0.0001 0.0202 0 0.0607 Non-saline 17 21
0.70 0.048 0.044 0.50 0.30 0.002
BD 36 3 12.0-14.0 7.8 0.00 0.024 0.0017 0.0084 0.0060 0.0024 0.0028 0.015 0 0.0452 Non-saline 17 81
0.40 0.05 0.17 0.30 0.20 0.12
BD 37 2 1.2-1.35 9.1 0.00 0.05 0.002 0.01 0.01 0.0012 0.013 0.0508 0 0.083 Non-saline 170 134
0.80 0.05 0.21 0.40 0.10 0.56
C-1-54

BD 37 1 3.2-3.4 8 0.00 0.043 0.0051 0.010 0.010 0.0012 0.013 0.0478 0 0.0804 Non-saline 52 101
0.70 0.145 0.211 0.40 0.10 0.56
BD 37 1 6.0-12.7 7.8 0.00 0.024 0.0017 0.021 0.008 0.0012 0.0091 0.033 0 0.0652 Non-saline 17 213
0.40 0.048 0.444 0.40 0.10 0.396
BD 37 3 12.7-14.6 7.8 0.00 0.018 0.0034 0.019 0.006 0.0024 0.0068 0.0317 0 0.0558 Non-saline 34 190
0.30 0.097 0.395 0.30 0.20 0.296

BD 34 3 6.4-7 8.4 0.00 0.020 0.002 0.026 0.006 0.001 0.012 0.043 0 0.067 Non-saline 18 299
0.33 0.05 0.54 0.3 0.1 0.52
Ishym River

BD 34 4 10.2-10.4 9.1 0.003 0.020 0.010 0.003 0.004 0.001 0.001 0.036 0 0.052 Non-saline 103 34
0.1 0.33 0.29 0.07 0.2 0.1 0.49
BD 35 3 5.3-6.3 7.8 0.003 0.036 0.007 0.072 0.024 0.004 0.021 0.079 0.044 0.169 Non-saline 67 720
0.1 0.55 0.19 1.5 1.2 0.3 0.9
BD 35 4 7.0-8.0 7.8 0 0.040 0.012 0.006 0.004 0.0 0.019 0.07 0 0.086 Non-saline 117 62
0.66 0.33 0.13 0.2 0.84
 Annex D Results of Chemical Analysis of Water (6/7)

Corrosive activity of water to

Carbonic acid, corrosive

Corrosive activity of
water to cable cover
Hardness, mg- Reinforcement of

Content of organic

Mineralization
2
equiv/dm ferroconcrete

substances

made of
construction at
Cation Anion
Borehole No.

Concrete of W4 type

immersion
permanent

periodical
Facility

wetting
Non-carbonate
Unit pH

Corbonate
Total

Aluminium
3

3
-

mg/dm

mg/dm

mg/dm

HCO3

Na+K
HCO3

2-
+

Lead
2+

NH4
3+

SO4
NO3

NO2
+

NH4

Mg
-
+

Cl
SO4
Mg

Na

Cl
Ca

Fe
mg 72 47 495 1.2 0.84 < 0.1 695 145 643 0.6 < 0.01
21 mg-equiv. 3.6 3.8 21.5 0.03 0.05 11.4 4.1 13.4 0.01 7.4 1.4 0.72 1852 7.4 7.4 - L H x x x x x x S
%mg-equiv. 12.4 13.1 74.2 0.1 0.2 39.4 14.2 46.4 0.6
mg 148 125 223 1.6 < 0.1 0.72 427 170 764 0.01
22 mg-equiv. 7.4 10.5 9.7 0.04 0.04 7 4.8 15.9 < 0.01 7.3 1.1 0.21 1648 17.9 7 10.9 L H x x x x x x S
%mg-equiv. 26.7 37.9 35 0.2 0.2 253 17.3 0.01
mg 132 115 186 0.8 < 0.1 < 0.1 537 110 602 5 < 0.01
23 mg-equiv. 6.6 9.4 8.1 0.02 8.8 3.1 12.6 0.081 7.5 < 1.1 1.24 1415 16 8.8 7.2 L H x x x x x x S
C-1-55

%mg-equiv. 27.4 39 33.6 35.8 12.6 51.3 0.3

Water Treatment Plant

mg 140 130 261 1.6 < 0.1 0.18 561 170 720 5 <0.01
24 mg-equiv. 7 10.6 11.4 0.04 0.1 9.2 4.8 15 0.081 7.5 < 1.1 0.207 1705 17.6 9.2 8.4 L H x x x x x x M
%mg-equiv. 24.1 36.5 39.3 0.1 31.7 16.5 51.5 0.3
mg 120 61 138 1.9 0.48 < 0.1 477 219 145 < 0.5 < 0.01
25 mg-equiv. 6 5 6 0.05 0.26 7.8 6.2 3 7.7 < 1.1 0.21 925 11 7.8 3.2 L H x x x x x x S
%mg-equiv. 34.7 28.9 34.7 0.2 1.5 45.9 36.5 17.6
mg 100 42 388 0.8 < 0.1 < 0.1 551 393 264 < 0.5 < 0.01
26 mg-equiv. 5 3.4 16.9 0.02 9 11.1 5.5 7.5 < 1.1 0.72 1463 8.4 8.4 - L H x x x x x x M
%mg-equiv. 19.8 13.4 66.8 35.2 43.3 21.5
mg 88 66 340 1.2 0.48 < 0.1 747 216 304 < 0.5 1.16
27 mg-equiv. 4.4 5.4 14.8 0.03 0.26 12.2 6.1 6.3 0.025 7.3 < 1.1 1.76 1390 9.8 9.8 - L H x x x x x x M
%mg-equiv. 17.7 21.7 59.5 0.1 1 49.6 24.8 25.6
mg 112 88 964 1.2 0.4 < 0.1 709 583 1265 < 0.5 < 0.01
28 mg-equiv. 5.6 7.2 42 0.03 0.02 11.6 16.4 26.4 7.5 < 1.1 4.34 3368 12.8 11.6 1.2 L H x x x x M x M
%mg-equiv. 10.2 13.1 76.6 0.1 21.3 30.1 48.6
 Annex D Results of Chemical Analysis of Water (7/7)

Corrosive activity of water to

Carbonic acid, corrosive

Corrosive activity of
water to cable cover
Hardness, mg- Reinforcement of

Content of organic

Mineralization
2
equiv/dm ferroconcrete

substances

made of
construction at
Cation Anion
Borehole No.
Concrete of W4 type

immersion
permanent

periodical
Facility

wetting
Non-carbonate
Unit pH

Corbonate
Total

Aluminium
3

3
-

mg/dm

mg/dm

mg/dm

HCO3

Na+K
HCO3

2-
+

Lead
2+

NH4
3+

SO4
NO3

NO2
+

NH4

Mg
-
+

Cl
SO4
Mg

Na

Cl
Ca

Fe
mg 160 245 931 0.4 < 0.1 < 0.1 1175 1202 738 < 0.5 0.46
29 mg-equiv. 8 20 41 0.01 19.3 33.9 15.4 0.1 7.2 < 1.1 5.38 3864 28 19.3 8.7 L H x x x x x x M
%mg-equiv. 11.6 29 59.4 28.1 49.4 22.5
mg 140 271 830 0.4 0.1 < 0.1 979 1205 720 < 0.5 < 0.01
Sewerage Treatment Plant

30 mg-equiv. 7 22 36 0.01 0.01 16.1 33.9 15 7.2 < 1.1 3.83 3656 29 16.1 12.9 L H x x x x x x M
%mg-equiv. 10.8 33.8 55.4 24.8 52.2 23
mg 120 184.8 1247 1.5 < 0.1 0.18 1456 1120 970 < 0.5 < 0.01
31 mg-equiv. 6 15.4 54.2 0.04 0.01 23.9 31.5 20.2 7.3 < 1.1 4.86 4374 21.4 21.4 - L H x x x x x x M
%mg-equiv. 7.9 20.4 71.6 0.1 31.6 41.7 26.7
mg 168 105 900 17.6 0.48 0.18 967 872 776 < 0.5 < 0.01
32 mg-equiv. 8.4 8.6 39 0.45 0.03 0.01 15.9 24.6 16.2 7.3 < 1.1 10.55 3322 17 15.9 1.1 L H x x x x x x M
C-1-56

%mg-equiv. 14.9 15.2 69 0.8 0.1 28 43.4 28.6

mg 76 127 794 0.8 < 0.1 5.4 808 539 983 36.2 0.6
33 mg-equiv. 3.8 10.4 35 0.02 0.3 13.2 15.2 20.5 0.58 0.013 7.5 - 2.79 2963 14.2 13.2 1 L H x x x x x x M
%mg-equiv. 7.7 21 70.7 0.6 26.7 30.7 41.4 1.2

mg 156 53 48 5.4 < 0.1 0.82 470 229 4.8 < 0.5 < 0.01
Ishym River

34 mg-equiv. 7.8 4.4 2.1 0.14 0.05 7.7 6.5 0.1 7.2 1.1 0.72 966 12.2 7.7 4.5 L H x x x x x x S
%mg-equiv. 53.8 30.4 14.5 1 0.3 53.8 45.5 0.7
mg 265 84 229 5.5 < 0.1 0.56 549 592 226 < 0.5 < 0.01
35 mg-equiv. 13.2 7 10 0.14 0.03 9 16.7 4.7 7.4 < 1.1 42.1 1677 20.2 9 11.2 L H x x x x x x M
%mg-equiv. 43.5 23 32.9 0.5 0.1 29.6 54.9 15.5

Note: " x " means "not corrosive", " L " means "low corrosive", " S " means "slightly corrosive", " M " means "medium
", "corrosive
H " means "high corrosive"
 Annex E Concrete Permeability Attributes

Direct Indirect
Conventional signs of a
concrete permeability Concrete type
Filtration ratio, Water Water-cement
attribute according to
cm/s (at moisture absorption, % by proportion,
its water-proof
equilibrium), Kf weight not larger than
ability
N – concrete of from 2 x 10-9
W4 from 4.7 to 5.7 0.6
normal permeability to 7 x 10-9
L – concrete of from 6 x 10-10
W6 from 4.2 to 4.7 0.55
low permeability to 2 x 10-9
V – concrete of from 1 x 10-10
W8 up to 4.2 0.45
very low permeability to 6 x 10-10
Note: 1. Filtration ratio and concrete type according to its water-proof ability should be defined by GOST 12730.5-84; concrete
water-absorption – by GOST 12730.3-78
2. Water-absorption and water-cement proportion attributes (given in table 1) are referred to hard concrete. Light concrete
water-absorption should be defined by multiplying of the values from table 1 by the coefficient, equal to the ratio of hard
concrete medium density to light concrete medium density. Water-cement proportion of light concrete should be defined by
multiplying of the value given in table 1 by 1.3.
3. Further on in the text, the value of concrete permeability is given according to the water-proof ability attribute.

Source: USSR(1986) SNiP 2.03.11-85 Protection from corrosion for building construction

C-1-57