CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Study
Nowadays, there are hundreds of thousands traffic signals in Philippines. They play
an important role in the transportation network and are a source for significant
frustration for the public when not operated efficiently. Traffic signal timings in a road
network can not only affect total user travel time and total amount of traffic emissions in
the network but also create an inequity problem in terms of the change in travel costs of
users traveling between different locations. It offers a potential to prevent traffic
accidents and improve mobility of transportation network by alternatively allocating right
of way. The design of traffic signal timing parameters, such as green time ratio, can
significantly affect the operational efficiency and safety of intersections and the total
amount of traffic emissions in the network. It is, therefore, crucial for the authority to
design the traffic signal timing parameters carefully so as to create a safe, efficient, and
sustainable urban transportation system, particularly in an era of climate change.
Tumaga Road – Gov. Ramos Ave. Intersection is a T-intersection has an installed
traffic signal that shows to be one of the main problems and isn’t working to provide the
traffic a supposed traffic timer for them to have smooth and safe movements. To give
solution to this problem, the researchers aim to determine the right traffic signal timing
in the intersection to control traffic with orderliness and accuracy.
1.2 Statement of the Problem
Tumaga Road – Gov. Ave. T intersection was unserviceable, and the traffic sign
system operational timing is dysfunctional. In relation to this, the researchers sought to
develop an accurate traffic signal system following the Traffic Signal Timing Manual by
the Federal Highway Administration and Highway Capacity Manual, and based on the
present-day data, gathered by the researchers firsthand.
1.3 Objectives of the Study
The goal of this study is to determine the accurate traffic signal timing based on the
present traffic volume and adapting the steps from the Traffic Signal Timing Manual and
Highway Capacity Manual. Along with this, the following objectives are specified:
a. To determine the traffic volume to be obtained directly from field manual traffic
survey
b. To analyze traffic characteristics such as traffic movements, lane volume, critical
v/c ratio, and delays
c. To theoretically determine the traffic signal timing to provide smooth flow in the
intersection
1.4 Scope and Limitation of the Study
The study will focus on developing an accurate traffic signal system for the T-
intersection Intersection in Tumaga Road – Gov. Ramos Ave. The intersection design
and its relationship to the signal timing will be disregarded. Traffic count will be
conducted manually for a 12-hour survey with 15-minute intervals that would be useful
in computing the peak hour factor. There are two outputs that will be presented, AM
traffic signal timing and PM traffic signal timing. The traffic signal system will be
simulated as a model validation and application. The researchers will follow the Traffic
Signal Timing Manual by Federal Highway Administration for the computations and
procedures of the signal timing.
1.5 Significance of the Study
The results of this study can be expected to provide for the orderly and efficient
movement of people, effectively maximize the volume movements served at the
intersection, reduce the frequency and severity of certain types of crashes, and provide
appropriate levels of accessibility for pedestrians and side street traffic.
CHAPTER III
METHODOLOGY
This chapter will discuss the methods and procedures employed in gathering,
classification and interpretation of data in the research study entitled Retiming Traffic
Signals in the Tumaga T-Intersection.
3.1 Research Design
This study will be an evaluative study with surveying approach which is
principally concerned in designing a traffic signal timing based on the traffic
characteristics. We will be analyzing the traffic characteristics, and influence in the
intersection and to perform a traffic simulation. We will use and follow the Traffic Signal
Timing Manual by Federal Highway Administration.
3.2 Research Locale
The research will be conducted at the T-intersection in Tumaga Road – Gov.
Ramos Ave. There are three legs that were connected: Gov. Ramos Ave., Veterans
Ave. Extension, and Tumaga Road.
3.3 Design Procedure
A. Data Collection
Data will gathered from various traffic studies that are related to our research
study and other previous study on designing a three-phased signal system. Traffic count
survey will be conducted manually by the researchers firsthand.
B. Materials
The materials that we will use in this study are as follows:
1. 12-hour traffic count survey data
2. Work sheets on computing lane volume
3. Work sheets on computing signal timing
4. Worksheet on computing critical v/c ratio
5. Worksheet on computing average vehicle delay
6. Synchro Software for traffic simulation
C. Design Procedures
Traffic count Computing of lane Designing the Traffic
surveying volume signal timing
Traffic Signal Timing Computing average Computing of critical
using simulation vehicle delay v/c ratio
a. Traffic Count Surveying
We will conduct a 12-hour traffic count with a 15-minutes interval at two
intersections: Tumaga T-Intersection and Cabato road intersection. We will use the
Turning Movement Count to determine the lane volume and turning movements that
we will need to design traffic signal timing. We will need 14 persons in order to
conduct the 12-hour traffic count.
Figure 1 Cabato Road Intersection
Figure 2 Tumaga T-Intersection
b. Computing Lane Volume
We will use the lane volume computations to control delay and level of service to
synthesize the signal timing plan.
c. Traffic Signal Design
Traffic signal design is will be divided into six steps:
1. Phasing plan development
2. Computation of critical sum
3. Estimation of amber time and lost time
4. Determination of peak hour factor
5. Determination of cycle length
6. Assigning of green time
7. Assigning of pedestrian time to walk
d. Critical v/c Ratio
The computational method involves the summation of conflicting critical lane flow
rates for the t-intersection.
Xcm = CS / RS (1-l/c)
Where:
Xcm is critical v/c ratio
CS is critical sum (veh/h)
L is total lost time (s)
C is cycle length (s)
RS is the reference sum (veh/h/In)
e. Computing Vehicle Average Delay
We will be computing delay as it is the most frequent used parameter of
effectiveness for intersections. Uniform queue size and delay computations will be
conducted. Also, values from the previous procedures will be used.
d. Traffic signal timing using simulation: Synchro Software
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
This chapter provides an overview of previous research on knowledge sharing
and intranets. It introduces the framework for the case study that comprises the main
focus of the research described in this research.
Road traffic jams continue to remain a major problem in most cities around the
world, especially in developing regions resulting in massive delays, increased fuel
wastage and monetary losses. Due to the poorly planned road networks, a common
outcome in many developing regions is the presence of small critical areas which are
common hot-spots for congestion; poor traffic management around these hotspots
potentially results in elongated traffic jams (Jain, et al., 2012). Traffic light timing is one
of the most practical and cheapest solutions to deal with congestion problem of
intersections in crowded urban areas. Different methods have been introduced in
several types of research for traffic light timing
2.1 Traffic Signal
The origin of traffic control signals can be traced back to the manually operated
semaphores first used in London as early as 1868. The first traffic signal in the United
States was developed with the objective to prevent accidents by alternatively assigning
right of way. The traffic signal has changed significantly since its early development.
Today, there are more than 272,000 traffic signals in the United States. They play an
important role in the transportation network and are a source for significant frustration
for the public when not operated efficiently. As the era of freeway building draws to a
close, urban arterials are being called upon to carry more users than ever before at a
time when the users of these facilities are growing more complex (older drivers, more
distractions, larger vehicles, etc.) and the demand for such use continues to outpace
transportation supply. According to the 2001 Nationwide Personal Transportation
Survey, on average, an individual traveled 40 miles per day, up from approximately 35
in 1990. At the same time, the use of traffic signals at a busy intersection in a typical
urban area might direct the movement of as many as 100,000 vehicles per day. In fact
over ten percent of all intersections in California carry more than 60,000 Average Daily
Traffic (ADT) for movements. It is estimated that many of these signals could be
improved by updating equipment or by simply adjusting and updating the timing plans.
Outdated or poor traffic signal timing accounts for a significant portion of traffic delay on
urban arterials and traffic signal retiming is one of the most cost effective ways to
improve traffic flow and is one of the most basic strategies to help mitigate congestion.
Despite their important role in traffic management, traffic signals, once installed, are
often not proactively managed. Maintenance activities are frequently delayed or
canceled, in reaction to shrinking budgets and staffs. More than half of the signals in
North America are in need of repair, replacement, or upgrading. In 2007, the National
Traffic Signal Report Card was released by the National Transportation Operations
Coalition and consisted of the composite national scores from an agency self-
assessment related to traffic signal control and operations, the responses in five sub
areas indicate an overall national "grade" of D up from a D- in 2005 (Federal Highway
Administration, Signal Timing Manual).
2.2 Traffic Signal Timing
Research and experience has shown that retiming traffic signals is one of the
most cost-effective tasks that an agency can do to improve traffic flow. Traffic flow
improvements of up to 26 percent have been reported. Increasing trend in the number
of vehicles and consequently intensifying the traffic volume, traffic lights optimum timing
plays a vital role in congestion mitigation in the critical intersections of urban areas
(Kamran, et al., 2017). The rapid increase in the number of vehicles is an undeniable
fact that all countries face with it. Moreover, streets and urban areas in third world
countries and even in many developed cities are not designed according to the urban
planning principals and it is difficult to change their road plans because of the high
prices of the famous buildings in downtowns. Therefore, the most feasible solution is to
use new technologies to manage the traffic congestions in populated areas. Improved
traffic signal operation can help reduce intersection crashes (Boston Transportation
Department, 2010).
According to Federal Highway Administration, traffic signal timing is a critical role
that plays within the overall transportation network. Signal timing offers the opportunity
to improve the mobility and safety of the street system and contribute environmental
benefits.
2.3 Design of Three-phase Signal System at Tumaga T-Intersection
This study focuses on the development of the three-phase signal system for the
T-Intersection in Tumaga Road and Governor Ramos Avenue. A 12-hour traffic survey
was conducted with a 15-minute interval in order to calcute the peak-hour factor. They
made a two design: AM and PM design. The design of the traffic signal system was
simulated using the PTV Vissim software as a model validation and application. They
concluded that the level of service was at level C for both morning and afternoon design
implying stable flow in the intersection.
2.4 Effects of Traffic Signal Retiming
It has long been recognized that traffic signal timing can have an impact on the
safety of the intersection. Some parameters are obvious – Yellow Change and Red
Clearance interval timings are critical to each phase, as are the Walk and Flashing
Don’t Walk pedestrian intervals. Preemption times are also crucial in some situations,
as was demonstrated in the 1995 Fox River Grove, Illinois, crash between a school bus
and a commuter train. And, other controller related parameters can also have an impact
on safety, especially if the expectations of the drivers using the intersection are not met.
What about the coordination parameters for progression along a roadway; how could
they impact the crash history at an intersection? It is intuitive that the smoother the flow
of traffic along an arterial, the “safer” the arterial should be. NCHRP’s Guide for
Reducing Collisions at Signalized Intersections1 defines one strategy as “Employ Signal
Coordination”. Some of the key factors for that strategy in the report included: •
Reducing the number and frequency of required stops and maintaining constant speeds
for all vehicles can help to reduce rear-end conflicts. • Increased platooning can create
more gaps of increased length for permitted vehicle movements (such as permitted left
turns and right turns on red) at intersections and result in improved intersection
operation. • Platooning will contribute to consistent vehicle speeds along a corridor,
which will help reduce rear-end type crashes. The Institute of Transportation Engineers’
Traffic Safety Toolbox2 references two Atlanta area studies of signal coordination
implementation where intersection crash frequencies dropped by 25 and 38 percent. On
one of the two studies, statistically significant reductions were noted for total collisions,
property damage only collisions, personal injury collisions, and right angle, rear end, left
turn, and sideswipe crashes. However, both of these studies were for new system
implementations, i.e., comparing new system timings to isolated, non-interconnected
operation. How much of an impact on safety would a signal “retiming” project make?
This performance measure is not thoroughly addressed for most before-and-after
analyses of system retiming projects. Travel time runs can develop a good indication of
project related Measures of Effectiveness, documenting improvements such as fuel
consumption, delay and travel time, and pollutant emissions, but adequate amounts of
crash data require significant “after” periods of evaluation. The original timing engineer
or consultant may no longer be available or under contract by the end of that time
period, field conditions may have changed along the corridor, or the agency may have
moved its attention on to the latest project. Even the new Highway Safety Manual does
not discuss the potential safety benefits of signal coordination; there is no Crash
Modification Factor (CMF) for signalized intersections or arterial segments that would
address the absence or presence of coordination and platooning on an arterial. There
are numerous CMFs related to change and clearance intervals, and there is one CMF
included in the Crash Modifications Factors Clearinghouse3 that addresses a change in
cycle length in a coordinated system. The informational gap between the intuitive
reasoning that signal coordination will improve traffic safety and the void of statistical
data to support that reasoning is the basis for this paper. Traffic signal retiming could be
a significant safety improvement, but without the supporting cost-effectiveness
information used in accepting and prioritizing safety projects, may be overlooked as a
low cost, easy to implement option (Yauch, 2004).
Republic of the Philippines
Western Mindanao State Unversity
College of Engineering and Technology
Civil Engineering Department
Normal, Road, Baliwasan, Zamboanga City, 7000
Proposed Title
Effective Geometric Design of Roundabout
in Vitaliano Agan Avenue Intersection, Zamboanga City using PTV Vissim
Jdulia Claire M. Ruiz
Research