GEOTECHNICAL AND SLOPE

STABILITY INVESTIGATION FOR

PROPOSED COMMERCIAL BUILDING,
3024 COUNTRYSIDE DRIVE,
BRAMPTON, ON

CLONARD GROUP

PROJECT NO.: 171-17622-00

DATE: FEBRUARY 26, 2018

WSP
51 CONSTELLATION COURT
TORONTO, ON, CANADA M9W 1K4

WSP.COM

WSP Canada Inc.

TABLE OF 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 1

CONTENTS 2 FIELD AND LABORATORY WORKS ........................... 2

2.1 GEOTECHNICAL BOREHOLES AND FIELD TESTING .............2

2.2 GEOTECHNICAL LABORATORY TESTING .................................2

3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ......................................... 3

3.1 SOIL CONDITIONS ...............................................................................3
3.1.1 TOPSOIL ................................................................................................................................................... 3
3.1.2 FILL............................................................................................................................................................... 3
3.1.3 SILTY CLAY ............................................................................................................................................. 3
3.1.4 SILTY SAND, SANDY SILT.............................................................................................................. 3
3.1.5 BEDROCK – WEATHERED SHALE .......................................................................................... 4

3.2 GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS ..................................................... 4

4 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............. 5

4.1 GENERAL ............................................................................................... 5

4.2 FOUNDATIONS .................................................................................... 5

4.3 FLOOR SLAB AND PERMANENT DRAINAGE .......................... 6

4.4 EXCAVATIONS, BACKFILL AND OTHER

CONSIDERATIONS ............................................................................. 6

4.5 EARTH PRESSURES............................................................................7

4.6 EARTHQUAKE CONSIDERATIONS ...............................................7

4.7 SLOPE STABILITY ASSESSMENT ..................................................7

4.7.1 SLOPE INSPECTION AND MAPPING .................................................................................... 7
4.7.2 SOIL PARAMETERS AND GROUNDWATER ....................................................................8
4.7.3 TOE EROSION ALLOWANCE......................................................................................................8
4.7.4 STABILITY OF EXISTING SLOPE AND STABLE SLOPE...............................................9
4.7.5 DEVELOPMENT SETBACK ...........................................................................................................9
4.7.6 LONG TERM STABLE SLOPE, AND OTHER COMMENTS ON SLOPE
STABILITY ................................................................................................................................................9

Geotechnical and Slope Stability Investigation for Proposed Commercial Building, 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton, ON WSP
Project No. 171-17622-00 February 26, 2018
Clonard Group Page i
 5 GENERAL COMMENTS AND LIMITATIONS OF
REPORT.................................................................................. 11

6 CLOSURE .............................................................................. 12

Geotechnical and Slope Stability Investigation for Proposed Commercial Building, 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton, ON WSP
Project No. 171-17622-00 February 26, 2018
Clonard Group Page ii
 TABLES
TABLE 2.1 SUMMARY OF BOREHOLE INFORMATION ................. 2
TABLE 3.1 SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER
OBSERVATIONS .............................................................................. 4
TABLE 4.1: RECOMMENDED FOOTING DEPTHS /
ELEVATIONS ...................................................................................... 5
TABLE 4.2 SOIL PARAMETERS FOR SLOPE STABILITY
ANALYSES ........................................................................................... 8

DRAWINGS
SITE LOCATION (DRAWING 1)
BOREHOLE, SLOPE, AND PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION PLAN ...........................
(DRAWING 1A)
LONG-TERM STABLE TOP OF SLOPE LINE LOCATION (DRAWING 1B)
EXISTING SLOPE PROFILES & LONG-TERM STABLE TOP OF SLOPE
LINE LOCATION (DRAWINGS 2 THROUGH 6)
DRAINAGE AND BACKFILL RECOMMENDATIONS (DRAWING 7)

APPENDICES
A NOTES ON SAMPLE DESCRIPTIONS, LOGS OF BOREHOLES ............
(BH17-1 TO BH17-4)
B GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVES AND ATTERBERG LIMITS ......
TESTS RESULTS
C SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES RESULTS
D SITE VISIT PHOTOGRAPHS (TO BE READ IN CONJUCTION WITH
DRAWING 1)

Geotechnical and Slope Stability Investigation for Proposed Commercial Building, 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton, ON WSP
Project No. 171-17622-00 February 26, 2018
Clonard Group Page iii
1 INTRODUCTION
WSP Canada Inc. (WSP) was retained by Clonard Group to undertake a geotechnical and slope stability investigation for the
proposed commercial building located at 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton, Ontario (refer Drawing 1).
The subject property is located at the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Airport Road and Countryside Drive in the
City of Brampton, Ontario. The tableland is relatively flat, and on the north side is followed by a valley slope associated with
the floodplain of Humber River. The property currently comprise of a one storey high residential building.
WSP understands that it is proposed to demolish the existing building and construct a one storey medical office with one
level of underground parking. Due to the proximity of the proposed medical office to the slope, a site specific slope stability
study is required to assess the long term stability of the subject slope with respect to the proposed development.
The purpose of this geotechnical investigation was to determine the subsurface conditions at the borehole locations and
from the findings in the boreholes make engineering recommendations for the following:
1. Foundations
2. Floor slab and permanent drainage
3. Excavations and backfill
4. Earthquake considerations
5. Earth pressures
6. Slope Stability Asessment
This report is provided on the basis of the terms of reference presented above and on the assumption that the design will be
in accordance with the applicable codes and standards. If there are any changes in the design features relevant to the
geotechnical analyses, or if any questions arise concerning the geotechnical aspects of the codes and standards, this office
should be contacted to review the design. It may then be necessary to carry out additional borings and reporting before the
recommendations of this office can be relied upon.
The site investigation and recommendations follow generally accepted practice for geotechnical consultants in Ontario. The
format and contents are guided by client specific needs and economics and do not conform to generalized standards for
services. Laboratory testing for most part follows ASTM or CSA Standards or modifications of these standards that have
become standard practice.
This report has been prepared for Clonard Group and its designers. Third party use of this report without WSP Canada Inc.
consent is prohibited.

Geotechnical and Slope Stability Investigation for Proposed Commercial Building, 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton, ON WSP
Project No. 171-17622-00 February 26, 2018
Clonard Group Page 1
2 FIELD AND LABORATORY WORKS

2.1 GEOTECHNICAL BOREHOLES AND FIELD TESTING

Four boreholes (BH18-1 to BH18-4) were drilled at the subject site to the depths ranging from 7.0 to 16.0m below existing
ground at the locations shown on the attached Drawing 1. A summary of the borehole data is presented in Table 2-1.
Table 2.1 Summary of Borehole Information

Borehole Easting Northing Approximate Ground Depth of Note

Elevation (m) Borehole (m)
NAD83, UTM Zone 17

BH18-1 600654 4848619 225.40 15.9 Monitoring well

BH18-2 600679 4848618 225.55 16.0 Monitoring Well

BH18-3 600646 4848592 225.72 7.0 -

BH18-4 600679 4848607 225.89 7.0 -

Prior to drilling operations, all underground utilities were cleared at the borehole locations.
The field investigation work was undertaken on January 29 and 30, 2018 by a drilling sub-contractor under the direction and
supervision of WSP personnel. Borehole logging services were provided by the engineering staff of WSP. The boreholes
were advanced with power auger drilling machines equipped with solid/hollow stem augers. The soil stratigraphy was
recorded by observing the quality and changes of augered materials which were retrieved from the boreholes, and by
sampling the soils at regular intervals of depth using a 50 mm O.D. split spoon sampler, in accordance with the Standard
Penetration Test (ASTM D 1586) method. This sampling method recovers samples from the soil strata, and the number of
blows (SPT ‘N’-values) required to drive the sampler 0.3 m depth into the undisturbed soil gives an indication of the
compactness condition or consistency of the sampled soil material. The SPT ‘N’ values are indicated on the borehole log
sheets (Refer to Encl. 1 to 4, Appendix A). Soil samples were visually classified in the field and later re-evaluated in our
laboratory.
Groundwater conditions in the boreholes were observed during and upon completion of drilling.
Monitoring wells were installed in BH18-1 and BH18-2 for long term groundwater monitoring.

2.2 GEOTECHNICAL LABORATORY TESTING

The soil samples were taken to WSP’s laboratory where they were re-examined. Representative soil samples were selected
for geotechnical index testing. The testing program consisted of the measurement of the natural moisture content of all
available soil samples, grain size analysis of three (3) selected samples and consistency (Atterberg) limit tests on two (2) soil
samples taken from boreholes. The results of the particle size distribution tests and consistency (Atterberg) limit tests are
enclosed on Figures 1 to 4 in Appendix B of this report and are also summarized on the associated borehole log sheets.

Geotechnical and Slope Stability Investigation for Proposed Commercial Building, 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton, ON WSP
Project No. 171-17622-00 February 26, 2018
Clonard Group Page 2
3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
The borehole location plan is shown on Drawing 1A. Notes on soil samples description are presented in Appendix A. The
subsurface conditions in the boreholes are presented on individual borehole logs (Enclosures 1 to 4, Appendix A). The
subsurface conditions in the boreholes are summarized in the following paragraphs.

3.1 SOIL CONDITIONS

3.1.1 TOPSOIL
A layer of surficial topsoil ranging in thickness from 300 to 350 mm was found at the locations of boreholes BH17-1, BH17-3
and BH17-4. Topsoil quantities should not be calculated from the borehole information, as large variations in depth may
exist between and beyond the boreholes.

3.1.2 FILL
Underlying the topsoil or below grade, fill was encountered at all four borehole locations (BH17-1 to BH17-4). The fill depth
ranged from 0.8 m to 1.5 m below the existing grade. The fill generally consisted of silty clay materials, and was observed
with trace amounts of topsoil.
SPT ‘N’ values in the cohesive fill materials were in the range from 8 to 13 blows per 0.3 m of penetration, corresponding to
a stiff consistency. Water contents of the fill samples ranged from 10 to 25%.

3.1.3 SILTY CLAY

Beneath the fill, a deposit of silty clay was found at all four borehole locations.
At BH17-1, silty clay extended to a depth of 13.7 m below grade and was overlying the shale bedrock. At BH17-2, silty clay
extended to a depth of 15 m. At BH17-3 and BH17-4, silty clay extended to the explored depths of 7.0 m below grade. At
BH17-2, a sandy silt layer, about 0.5 m thick was found interbedded within the silty clay at a depth of 11.7 m.
SPT ‘N’ values in the silty clay were in the range of 6 to in excess of 50 blows per 300 mm of penetration, corresponding to
firm to hard consistency. Water contents ranged from 6% to 29%.
Two (2) selected silty clay samples (BH17-1/SS4 and BH17-2/SS7) were subjected to grain size analyses. Gradation curves are
presented on Figures 1 and 2 of Appendix B and summarized below:
Gravel: 0%
Sand: 4 to 9%
Silt: 38 to 39%
Clay: 53 to 59%
The same samples (BH17-1/SS4 and BH17-2/SS7) were subjected to Atterberg’s Limits test. Test results are presented on
Figure 4 of Appendix B and summarized below:
Liquid limit: 39 to 40%
Plastic Limit: 18 to 19%
Plasticity Index: 20 to 22

3.1.4 SILTY SAND, SANDY SILT

Below the silty clay material at borehole BH17-2, a saturated deposit of silty sand was encountered to the borehole
termination depth of 16.0 m.

Geotechnical and Slope Stability Investigation for Proposed Commercial Building, 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton, ON WSP
Project No. 171-17622-00 February 26, 2018
Clonard Group Page 3
As stated in Section 3.1.3, at borehole BH17-2, a sandy silt layer, about 0.5 m thick was found interbedded within the silty
clay at a depth of 11.7 m.
SPT ‘N’ values in the silty sand and sandy silt were in excess of 50 blows per 300 mm of penetration, corresponding to a very
dense relative density. Water contents ranged from 14% to 18%.
One (1) selected sandy silt sample (BH17-2/SS11) was subjected to grain size analysis. Gradation curve is presented in Figure
3 of Appendix B and summarized below:
Gravel: 0%
Sand: 26%
Silt: 70%
Clay: 4%

3.1.5 BEDROCK – WEATHERED SHALE

Underlying the silty clay (i.e. below Elevation 211.7 m), bedrock was augered to 15.9 m below existing ground surface.
Based on published literature, the site is underlain by the Georgian Bay Formation shale of upper Ordovician age.

3.2 GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS

Groundwater levels were measured in the monitoring wells on February 20, 2018. A, and as summarized in Table 3.1:
Table 3.1 Summary of Groundwater Observations

EXISTING SCREEN DEPTH GROUNDWATER

GROUNDWATER
BOREHOLE DATE OF GROUND DATE OF WATER (m) LEVEL
LEVEL DEPTH
NO. DRILLING ELEVATION MEASUREMENT ELEVATION
(m)
(m) From To (m)

BH18-1 January 30, 2018 225.4 February 20, 2018 12.5 15.5 8.7 216.7

BH18-2 January 29, 2018 225.6 February 20, 2018 12.5 15.5 8.8 216.8

It should be noted that the groundwater levels can vary and are subject to seasonal fluctuations in response to major weather
events.

Geotechnical and Slope Stability Investigation for Proposed Commercial Building, 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton, ON WSP
Project No. 171-17622-00 February 26, 2018
Clonard Group Page 4
4 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

4.1 GENERAL
The site is located on the tableland associated with the valley slope of a tributary of Humber River. The municipal address
of the property is 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton, Ontario and currently includes a one storey building with one level of
basement.
Based on the information provided to us, we understand that the proposed development will be a one storey medical office
with one level of underground parking, and will be constructed after demolishing the existing building at this site. The
depth of underground parking is not available, but we understand that it will be about 3 m below existing ground surface.
The footing bases will be further 1 to 2 m, and at elevator shafts will be 2 to 3 m below the basement finished floor.

4.2 FOUNDATIONS
The proposed building can be supported by conventional spread and strip footings founded on the very stiff undisturbed
native soils (generally 1.5 m below existing ground surface) for a bearing capacity of 250 kPa at the Serviceability Limit States
(SLS), and a factored geotechnical resistance of 375 kPa at the Ultimate Limit States (ULS). Below the depths of 4.6 m, a
relatively weaker soil layer is present across the site. The designer should ensure that this relatively weaker soil layer is not
over stressed due to the load pressure from the footings installed at higher elevation. A load spread of 2 vertical to 1
horizontal can be assumed below the footings to calculate the stress at depth.
The recommended bearing capacity and the highest founding depths/elevations at the borehole locations are summarized
in Table 4.1.
Table 4.1: Recommended Footing Depths / Elevations

RECOMMENDED BEARING CAPACITY

AT OR BELOW AT OR BELOW HIGHEST
ON NATIVE SOILS
BOREHOLE NO. EXISTING GROUND FOUNDING ELEVATION
SLS (kPa) ULS (kPa) (m) (m)

BH17-1 250 375 1.5 223.9

150 225 4.6 220.8

BH17-2 250 375 1.5 224.0

150 225 4.6 221.0

BH17-3 250 375 1.5 224.2

150 225 4.6 221.1

BH17-4 250 375 1.5 224.4

150 225 4.6 221.3

The base of all footings must be inspected by this office to ensure of their placement on the competent native soil.
Variations in the soil conditions are expected in between and beyond the borehole locations, and during construction, the
soil bearing pressures be confirmed by the Geotechnical Engineer.
Foundations designed to the specified bearing values are expected to settle less than 25 mm total and 20 mm differential.

Geotechnical and Slope Stability Investigation for Proposed Commercial Building, 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton, ON WSP
Project No. 171-17622-00 February 26, 2018
Clonard Group Page 5
All footings exposed to seasonal freezing conditions must have at least 1.2 meters of soil cover for frost protection.
Where it is necessary to place footings at different levels, the upper footing must be founded below an imaginary 10
horizontal to 7 vertical line drawn up from the base of the lower footing. The lower footing must be installed first to help
minimize the risk of undermining the upper footing.
Foundations in slope areas must be founded on stable ground below an imaginary 3H:1V line drawn up from the toe of the
slope.
It should be noted that the recommended bearing capacities have been calculated by WSP from the borehole information
for the due design stage only. The investigation and comments are necessarily on-going as new information of the
underground conditions becomes available. For example, more specific information is available with respect to conditions
between boreholes when foundation construction is underway. The interpretation between boreholes and the
recommendations of this report must therefore be checked through field inspections provided by WSP to validate the
information for use during the construction stage.

4.3 FLOOR SLAB AND PERMANENT DRAINAGE

With one level of basement, the floor slab can be supported on grade, provided disturbed, softened or loose native soils are
removed and the base thoroughly proof rolled. The fill required to raise the grade can consist of inorganic soil, placed in
shallow lifts and compacted to 98 percent of Standard Proctor Maximum Dry Density (SPMDD).
A moisture barrier consisting of at least 200 mm of 19 mm clear crushed stone should be installed under the floor slab.
With one level of basement slab, a perimeter drainage system will be required around the exterior basement walls. The
perimeter drainage system shown on Drawing 7 is recommended for the basement walls where open cut procedures are
used.

4.4 EXCAVATIONS, BACKFILL AND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

Excavations of overburden can be carried out with heavy hydraulic backhoe.
Based on the boreholes information, no major problems with groundwater are anticipated for the excavation of proposed
building due to the presence cohesive soils. Perched groundwater conditions from the fill may be encountered. In all
likelihood water seepage should be controllable by the use of conventional pumping from collection sumps and ditches for
most of the excavation. Contractors should be prepared to employ more elaborate dewatering procedures if the flow from
these sandy deposits becomes a problem.
It should be noted that the native soils may contain boulders. Possible large obstructions such as buried concrete pieces are
also anticipated in the fill material. WSP strongly advises that provisions are made in the excavation contract for the
removal of possible boulders in the native soils or obstructions in the fill material.
All excavations must be carried out in accordance with the most recent Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA). In
accordance with OHSA, the on-site fill and firm silty clay above groundwater table can be generally classified as Type 3 soils.
The very stiff to hard silty clay deposit can be classified as Type 2 soils above groundwater. Silty sand/sandy sand below the
groundwater table can be classified as Type 4.
Generally the fill is considered unsuitable as backfill material. However, selected inorganic fill and native soils free from
topsoil and organics can be used as general construction backfill where it can be compacted with sheep's foot type
compactors. Loose lifts of soil, which are to be compacted, should not exceed 200 mm.
The select inorganic fill and native soils free from topsoil and organics can be used as general construction backfill where it
can be compacted with sheep's foot type compactors. Loose lifts of soil, which are to be compacted, should not exceed 200
mm. The existing fill can be re-used provided unsuitable material including organic materials, debris and any other wet
materials are separated.
Depending on the time of construction and weather, some excavated material may be too wet to compact and will require
aeration prior to its use.

Geotechnical and Slope Stability Investigation for Proposed Commercial Building, 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton, ON WSP
Project No. 171-17622-00 February 26, 2018
Clonard Group Page 6
Imported granular fill, which can be compacted with hand held equipment, should be used in confined areas.
Underfloor fill should consist of Granular B Type II material compacted to at least 98 percent of Standard Proctor Maximum
Dry Density (SPMDD).
The excavated soils are not considered to be free draining. Where free draining backfill is required, imported granular fill
such as OPSS Granular B should be used.
It should be noted that the excavated soils are subject to moisture content increase during wet weather which would make
these materials too wet for adequate compaction. Stockpiles should be compacted at the surface or be covered with
tarpaulins to minimize moisture uptake.

4.5 EARTH PRESSURES

The lateral earth pressures acting on possible retaining walls or underground structures may be calculated from the
following expression:

p = K ( h +q)
where p = Lateral earth pressure in kPa acting at depth h

K = Earth pressure coefficient equal to 0.4 for vertical walls

and horizontal backfill used for permanent construction. Water pressure must be
considered, if continuous wall drains are not used.

 = Unit weight of backfill, a value of 21 kN/m3 may be assumed

h = Depth to point of interest in meters

q = Equivalent value of surcharge on the ground surface in kPa

The above expression assumes that the perimeter drainage system prevents the build up of any hydrostatic pressure behind
the wall.

4.6 EARTHQUAKE CONSIDERATIONS

Based on the borehole information, the site for the proposed building can be classified as ‘Class C’ for seismic site response
according to Table 4.1.8.4.A of OBC 2012.

4.7 SLOPE STABILITY ASSESSMENT

A site specific slope stability study was carried out based on two (2) boreholes (BH17-1 and BH17-2) drilled near the top of
the slope. These boreholes were advanced inlands towards the tableland and in the vicinity of slope crest, to assess the long-
term stability of the subject slope. This study included a visual inspection of the slope within the study area to assess existing
slope conditions with respect to any obvious signs of instability concerns, and a detailed slope stability analysis of selected
slope cross-section using computer software.

4.7.1 SLOPE INSPECTION AND MAPPING

A visual inspection of the subject slope was conducted on February 16, 2018. General information pertaining to existing
slope features such as slope profile, slope drainage, watercourse features, vegetation cover, structures in the vicinity of the
slope, as well as erosion and slope slide features was obtained during the inspection. Photographs of the site taken during

Geotechnical and Slope Stability Investigation for Proposed Commercial Building, 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton, ON WSP
Project No. 171-17622-00 February 26, 2018
Clonard Group Page 7
our site visit are shown in Appendix D of this report. A brief summary of the results of the visual inspection is presented
below.
The topographic survey of the property including the tableland and the valley slope was prepared by J. H. Gelbloom
Surveying Limited and provided by client. Two cross sections (Section A-A’ to Section E-E’) were inferred from the
topographic information provided and our field observations to prepare a slope model for the long-term slope stability
analysis. The cross-section location was selected on the basis of the slope height and inclination to represent the critical
slope condition present within the study area. The section included a portion of the tableland extending across the slope
down to a relatively flat ground. The location of the selected slope cross-section is presented on Drawing 1A, and slope
profile details are included on Drawings 2 through 6.
The slope in the general area is about 10 to 12 m high that extends from the tableland to the flood plain of Humber River.
The slope stretches between Countryside Drive and Airport Road, roughly in east-west direction. The tableland and slope
was covered with snow at the time of inspection. As noted before, the property (3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton)
currently includes a one storey house.
Based on the provided topographic information, the typical slope inclination within the study area was around 2.2 to 3.0
horizontal : 1.0 vertical, The slope is well vegetated with numerous young and mature trees (refer to photographs). No
evident slope slide features were noted. The tree trunk growth was generally straight and upright except for a few fallen
and leaning trees.
The slope in the study area is followed by floodplain of Humber River. The Humber River meanders within the floodplain
and is about 5 to 10 m wide, and flows in a west to east direction. Within the study area, creek comes in contact to the toe
of slope at two locations.
No evident tension cracks were noted in the vicinity of the subject slope during our site inspection. In general, the slope
appears to be stable and there were no obvious signs of slope instability.

4.7.2 SOIL PARAMETERS AND GROUNDWATER

Based on the borehole information, soil parameters were estimated based on public sheets data and empirical relationships.
The soil parameters used in the slope stability analyses are given on Table 4.2.
Table 4.2 Soil Parameters for Slope Stability Analyses

SOIL TYPE SOIL DENSITY LONG-TERM STRENGTH

(SEE SECTION 3 FOR SOIL DESCRIPTION) (kN/m ) 3
c' (kPa) ' (Degree)

Fill (cohesive) 19.5 1 26

Silty Clay (Stiff to Very Stiff) 20.0 19 27

Silty Clay (Hard) 21.0 22 29

Sandy Silt/Silty Sand (Dense / Very Dense) 22.0 0 36

The above soil strength parameters are based on the effective stress analysis for long-term slope stability.
The groundwater table at Borehole BH17-2 was measured at 8.8 (Elev. 216.8 m) below existing grade. A higher groundwater
table was assumed and incorporated in the model to simulate any future build-up of groundwater.

4.7.3 TOE EROSION ALLOWANCE

The regression of the slope toe due to erosion over the design life of the structure (typically 100 years for long-term) is
compensated by the introduction of an erosion allowance (setback) which is measured as a horizontal distance from the
existing creek bank. The erosion allowance is based on the type of the slope toe material and the stream characteristics

Geotechnical and Slope Stability Investigation for Proposed Commercial Building, 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton, ON WSP
Project No. 171-17622-00 February 26, 2018
Clonard Group Page 8
including the distance between the stream edge and the slope toe, bankfull width as well as the current toe erosion
condition. An erosion allowance is recommended in areas where the watercourse position is within 15 m of the slope toe.
The meandering watercourse at this site is about 5 to 10 m wide, and comes in contact with the toe of slope at two locations.
Based on borehole information, toe of slope consists of sandy materials.
TRCA generally follows the MNR Policy Guidelines for erosion setback. The MNR Policy Guidelines recommends an erosion
allowance of 5 m for sand soils for a bankfull width of 5 to 30 m, and no active toe erosion conditions. An erosion allowance
of 5 m is recommended for toe of slope. The long-term pertains to a 100 years planning horizon.

4.7.4 STABILITY OF EXISTING SLOPE AND STABLE SLOPE

As stated above, this slope stability study is based on two (2) boreholes (BH17-1 and BH17-2) boreholes are enclosed in
Appendix A of this report.
As noted in Section 4.7.1, WSP inferred five (5) slope cross-sections (Section A-A’ to Section E-E’) of which Section A-A was
the steepest. Detailed engineering analyses of slope stability were carried out for the selected slope cross-sections (Section
A-A’ through E-E’) utilizing computer software (SLIDE by Rocscience). For purposes of this study, the GLE\Morgenstern-
Price limit equilibrium method of analysis was conducted.
The analysis was carried out by preparing a model of the slope geometry and the subsurface conditions, and analyzing
numerous potential failure surfaces through the slope in search of the minimum or critical Factor of Safety for site specific
conditions. The pertinent data obtained from the topographic and borehole information were input in the slope stability
analysis. Many calculations were carried out to examine the factors of safety for varying depths for potential failure
surfaces.
The minimum factors of safety for the existing slope under normal groundwater conditions for Section A-A’ was 1.81
(Drawing C1, Appendix C).
For commercial developments, the MNR Policy Guidelines allow a minimum factor of safety of 1.3 to 1.5 for slope stability.
The computed factor of safety of 1.81 for normal groundwater conditions is considered adequate and acceptable with respect
to the industry standards as well as MNR and other conservation authority policy guidelines.
The slope stability analysis for a hypothetical slope profile with inclination of 2.0 horizontal : 1.0 vertical for Section A-A’
with similar sub-surface conditions resulted in a minimum factor of safety of 1.68 for normal groundwater condition (refer
Drawing C2, Appendix C) and 1.51 for the elevated groundwater conditions (refer Drawing C3, Appendix C). These factors
of safety conform to the minimum safety factor requirements and are considered adequate and acceptable in terms of long-
term stability.

4.7.5 DEVELOPMENT SETBACK

In addition to the stability and erosion setbacks an access allowance/development setback is typically required from the
identified slope hazard area (long-term Stable Top of Slope Line location) to take into account possible external conditions
which could have an adverse effect on the existing natural condition of the slope, and to provide access to the slope in
emergencies. This setback generally varies depending upon the policies of individual authorities. The determination of the
setback value depends on a number of factors including but not limited to, the watershed classification, type of development,
site specific conditions and available access to the slope. The structures may be allowed to be located closer to the long-
term Stable Top of Slope Line but only if approved by the concerned conservation authority.

4.7.6 LONG TERM STABLE SLOPE, AND OTHER COMMENTS ON SLOPE STABILITY
The Long-term Stable Slope Top of Slope (LTSTOS) location was calculated based on the applicable erosion and stability
setbacks in accordance with the Toronto Region and Conservation Authority guidelines. The slope stability analysis
completed in Section 4.7.4 concludes that a slope inclination of 2.0 horizontal : 1 vertical or flatter is required for the long-
term stability of the slope at this site. Drawings 2 to 6, and Drawing 1B present the estimated location of the Long-term
Stable Top of Slope Line in sections and plan (S1-S2-S3-S4-S5). Where the existing slope inclination is gentler than the
computed stable slope inclination of 2.0 horizontal : 1 vertical, the existing top of slope is the Long-term Stable Top of Slope

Geotechnical and Slope Stability Investigation for Proposed Commercial Building, 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton, ON WSP
Project No. 171-17622-00 February 26, 2018
Clonard Group Page 9
Line. The Drawings 2 to 6 delineate the location of the Long-term Stable Top, and is along the Physical Top of Bank for the
subject slope. The Long-term Stable Top of Slope Line includes the applicable toe erosion component and stability
component as assessed in Sections 4.7.3 and 4.7.4.
Additional comments related to any future construction at this property, and in terms of slope stability at the site are as
follows:
— Site development and construction activities should be conducted in a manner which do not result in surface
erosion of the slope. In particular, site grading and drainage should be designed to prevent direct concentrated or
channelized surface runoff from flowing directly over the slope. Water drainage from downspouts and the like
should not be permitted to flow over the slope, but a minor sheet flow may be acceptable.
— The configuration of the slope should not be altered without prior consultation with a geotechnical engineer. In
particular, the slope should not be steepened.
— Structures must be founded behind the setback/long term stable top of slope line.
— Foundations for the future development must be founded below imaginary 3 horizontal to 1 vertical (3H: 1V) lines,
drawn up from the toe of the stable slope.
— A sediment control fence must be erected and maintained during construction to isolate work area from the
adjoining slope and valley system.

Geotechnical and Slope Stability Investigation for Proposed Commercial Building, 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton, ON WSP
Project No. 171-17622-00 February 26, 2018
Clonard Group Page 10
5 GENERAL COMMENTS AND
LIMITATIONS OF REPORT
This report is intended solely for the Client named. The material in it reflects our best judgment in light of the information
available to WSP Canada Inc. at the time of preparation. Unless otherwise agreed in writing by WSP Canada Inc., it shall not
be used to express or imply warranty as to the fitness of the property for a particular purpose. No portion of this report may
be used as a separate entity, it is written to be read in its entirety.

The conclusions and recommendations given in this report are based on the information determined at the test hole
locations. The information contained herein in no way reflects on the environment aspects of the project, unless otherwise
stated. Subsurface and groundwater conditions between and beyond the test holes may differ from those encountered at
the test hole locations, and conditions may become apparent during construction, which could not be detected or
anticipated at the time of the site investigation. The benchmark and elevations used in this report are primarily to establish
relative elevation differences between the test hole locations and should not be used for other purposes, such as grading,
excavating, planning, development, etc.

The design recommendations given in this report are applicable only to the project described in the text and then only if
constructed substantially in accordance with the details stated in this report.

The comments made in this report on potential construction problems and possible methods are intended only for the
guidance of the designer. The number of test holes may not be sufficient to determine all the factors that may affect
construction methods and costs. For example, the thickness of surficial topsoil or fill layers may vary markedly and
unpredictably. The contractors bidding on this project or undertaking the construction should, therefore, make their own
interpretation of the factual information presented and draw their own conclusions as to how the subsurface conditions
may affect their work. This work has been undertaken in accordance with normally accepted geotechnical engineering
practices.

Any use which a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it, are the responsibility
of such third parties. WSP Canada Inc. accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result
of decisions made or actions based on this report.

Geotechnical and Slope Stability Investigation for Proposed Commercial Building, 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton, ON WSP
Project No. 171-17622-00 February 26, 2018
Clonard Group Page 11
DRAWINGS

SITE LOCATION (DRAWING 1)

BOREHOLE, SLOPE, AND PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION PLAN (DRAWING 1A)
LONG-TERM STABLE TOP OF SLOPE LINE LOCATION (DRAWING 1B)
EXISTING SLOPE PROFILES & LONG-TERM STABLE TOP OF SLOPE LINE LOCATION
(DRAWINGS 2 THROUGH 6)
DRAINAGE AND BACKFILL RECOMMENDATIONS (DRAWING 7)
 Go
re
wa
yD
r

d
dR
el
yfi
Ma

SITE
T:\Geotech\171 WSP Projects\171-17622-00 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton\Slope Stability\Drawing\171-17622-00 Slope-Feb23-2018.dwg

CLIENT: PROJECT NO: DRAWING NO:

CLONARD GROUP
171-17622-00 1
TITLE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:
SITE LOCATION PLAN
ZMO KS
PROJECT: DATE: SCALE:

51 CONSTELLATION COURT GEOTECHNICAL AND SLOPE STABILITY INVESTIGATION - FEB 20, 2018 N.T.S
TORONTO, ONTARIO CANADA M9W 1K4 3024 COUNTRYSIDE DRIVE, BRAMPTON, ON ORIGINAL SIZE: REV. #
TEL.: 416-798-0065 | FAX: 416-798-0518 | WWW.WSP.COM
LETTER N/A
 9 10

E'
3 D'

C'

B'
E
A'
2 4
T:\Geotech\171 WSP Projects\171-17622-00 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton\Slope Stability\Drawing\171-17622-00 Slope-Feb23-2018.dwg

D BH17-1

5
BH17-3
6

C
BH17-2

BH17-4 7

B
A'
8

CLIENT: PROJECT NO: DRAWING NO:

LEGEND A A CLONARD GROUP
Slope Location 171-17622-00 1A
TITLE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:
BOREHOLE, SLOPE AND PHOTO LOCATION PLAN
Borehole Location ZMO KS
PROJECT: DATE: SCALE:

51 CONSTELLATION COURT GEOTECHNICAL AND SLOPE STABILITY INVESTIGATION - FEB 20, 2018 AS SHOWN
1 Photo Location TORONTO, ONTARIO CANADA M9W 1K4 3024 COUNTRYSIDE DRIVE, BRAMPTON, ON ORIGINAL SIZE: REV. #
TEL.: 416-798-0065 | FAX: 416-798-0518 | WWW.WSP.COM
11x17 N/A
 E'
Existing Top of Slope (ETOS)

D'
S1

Long-term Stable Top of Slope (LTSTOS)

C'

B'
E
A'
T:\Geotech\171 WSP Projects\171-17622-00 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton\Slope Stability\Drawing\171-17622-00 Slope-Feb26-2018.dwg

S2

D BH17-1

BH17-3 S3

C
BH17-2 S4

BH17-4

B
S5

A'

CLIENT: PROJECT NO: DRAWING NO:

CLONARD GROUP
LEGEND 171-17622-00 1B
TITLE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:
LONG TERM STABLE TOP OF SLOPE (LTSTOS)
Long-term Stable Top of Slope (LTSTOS): Line S1 to S5 ZMO KS
PROJECT: DATE: SCALE:
Existing Top of Slope (ETOS)
51 CONSTELLATION COURT GEOTECHNICAL AND SLOPE STABILITY INVESTIGATION - FEB 20, 2018 AS SHOWN
A A
Slope Location
TORONTO, ONTARIO CANADA M9W 1K4 3024 COUNTRYSIDE DRIVE, BRAMPTON, ON ORIGINAL SIZE: REV. #
TEL.: 416-798-0065 | FAX: 416-798-0518 | WWW.WSP.COM
11x17 N/A
 Long-Term-Stable Top-of-Slope (LTSTOS)
Existing Top-of-Slope (ETOS)
Chain Link Fence

Post & Wire Fence S5

Existing Slope Profile

2.2H
1V

1V
2H
T:\Geotech\171 WSP Projects\171-17622-00 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton\Slope Stability\Drawing\171-17622-00 Slope-Feb23-2018.dwg

Creek

e = 5m

LEGEND
e = 5m - Erosion Allowance

Section A-A'

CLIENT: PROJECT NO: DRAWING NO:

CLONARD GROUP
171-17622-00 2
TITLE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:
SECTION A-A'
ZMO KS
PROJECT: DATE: SCALE:

51 CONSTELLATION COURT GEOTECHNICAL AND SLOPE STABILITY INVESTIGATION - FEB 20, 2018 AS SHOWN
TORONTO, ONTARIO CANADA M9W 1K4 3024 COUNTRYSIDE DRIVE, BRAMPTON, ON ORIGINAL SIZE: REV. #
TEL.: 416-798-0065 | FAX: 416-798-0518 | WWW.WSP.COM
11x17 N/A
 Long-Term-Stable Top-of-Slope (LTSTOS)
Existing Top-of-Slope (ETOS)
Chain Link Fence

Post & Wire Fence

S4
Existing Slope Profile

1V
2.9H
T:\Geotech\171 WSP Projects\171-17622-00 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton\Slope Stability\Drawing\171-17622-00 Slope-Feb23-2018.dwg

Section B-B'

CLIENT: PROJECT NO: DRAWING NO:

CLONARD GROUP
171-17622-00 3
TITLE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:
SECTION B-B'
ZMO KS
PROJECT: DATE: SCALE:

51 CONSTELLATION COURT GEOTECHNICAL AND SLOPE STABILITY INVESTIGATION - FEB 20, 2018 AS SHOWN
TORONTO, ONTARIO CANADA M9W 1K4 3024 COUNTRYSIDE DRIVE, BRAMPTON, ON ORIGINAL SIZE: REV. #
TEL.: 416-798-0065 | FAX: 416-798-0518 | WWW.WSP.COM
11x17 N/A
 Long-Term-Stable Top-of-Slope (LTSTOS)
Existing Top-of-Slope (ETOS)
S3
Existing Slope Profile

1V
2.7H
T:\Geotech\171 WSP Projects\171-17622-00 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton\Slope Stability\Drawing\171-17622-00 Slope-Feb23-2018.dwg

Section C-C'

CLIENT: PROJECT NO: DRAWING NO:

CLONARD GROUP
171-17622-00 4
TITLE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:
SECTION C-C'
ZMO KS
PROJECT: DATE: SCALE:

51 CONSTELLATION COURT GEOTECHNICAL AND SLOPE STABILITY INVESTIGATION - FEB 20, 2018 AS SHOWN
TORONTO, ONTARIO CANADA M9W 1K4 3024 COUNTRYSIDE DRIVE, BRAMPTON, ON ORIGINAL SIZE: REV. #
TEL.: 416-798-0065 | FAX: 416-798-0518 | WWW.WSP.COM
11x17 N/A
 Long-Term-Stable Top-of-Slope (LTSTOS)
Existing Top-of-Slope (ETOS)
Post & Wire Fence
Existing Slope Profile

S2

1V
3H
T:\Geotech\171 WSP Projects\171-17622-00 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton\Slope Stability\Drawing\171-17622-00 Slope-Feb23-2018.dwg

Creek

Section D-D'

CLIENT: PROJECT NO: DRAWING NO:

CLONARD GROUP
171-17622-00 5
TITLE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:
SECTION D-D'
ZMO KS
PROJECT: DATE: SCALE:

51 CONSTELLATION COURT GEOTECHNICAL AND SLOPE STABILITY INVESTIGATION - FEB 20, 2018 AS SHOWN
TORONTO, ONTARIO CANADA M9W 1K4 3024 COUNTRYSIDE DRIVE, BRAMPTON, ON ORIGINAL SIZE: REV. #
TEL.: 416-798-0065 | FAX: 416-798-0518 | WWW.WSP.COM
11x17 N/A
 Long-Term-Stable Top-of-Slope (LTSTOS)
Post & Wire Fence

Existing Top-of-Slope (ETOS)

T:\Geotech\171 WSP Projects\171-17622-00 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton\Slope Stability\Drawing\171-17622-00 Slope-Feb26-2018.dwg

Existing Slope Profile

S1

2.5H
1V

1V
Creek
2H

e = 5m

Section E-E' LEGEND

e = 5m - Erosion Allowance

CLIENT: PROJECT NO: DRAWING NO:

CLONARD GROUP
171-17622-00 6
TITLE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:
SECTION E-E'
ZMO KS
PROJECT: DATE: SCALE:

51 CONSTELLATION COURT GEOTECHNICAL AND SLOPE STABILITY INVESTIGATION - FEB 20, 2018 AS SHOWN
TORONTO, ONTARIO CANADA M9W 1K4 3024 COUNTRYSIDE DRIVE, BRAMPTON, ON ORIGINAL SIZE: REV. #
TEL.: 416-798-0065 | FAX: 416-798-0518 | WWW.WSP.COM
11x17 N/A
 1.0 m (min.)

Floor Slab (6)

Exterior Grade (9)

Impermeable Seal (5)

Basement Wall (8)
On-Site Material
if Approved (4) Free Draining Backfill (4)

20 mm Clear Stone (2) Moisture Barrier (7)

Slab on Grade(10)
Approved Filter Fabric Blanket (13)

Approved Filter Membrane (3)

20 mm Clear Stone (2)

Drainage Tile (1) Drainage Tile (1, 11, 12)

Approved Filter Membrane (3)
EXTERIOR FOOTING

Notes
1. Drainage tile to consist of 100 mm (4") diameter weeping tile or equivalent perforated
pipe leading to a positive sump or outlet.
C:\Users\kulbir.singh\Documents\A\4\171-17622-00 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton\Report\Drgs and Appendices\Drawings\Dwg. 8 Drainage and Backfill - Basement with underfloor.dwg

2. 20 mm (3/4") clear stone - 150 mm (6") top and side of drain. If drain is not on footing,
place100 mm (4 inches) of stone below drain .
3. Wrap the clear stone with an approved filter membrane (Terrafix 270R or equivalent).
4. Free Draining backfill - OPSS Granular B or equivalent compacted to the specified
density. Do not use heavy compaction equipment within 450 mm (18") of the wall. Use
hand controlled light compaction equipment within 1.8 m (6') of wall. The minimum
width of the Granular 'B' backfill must be 1.0 m.
5. Impermeable backfill seal - compacted clay, clayey silt or equivalent. If original soil is
free-draining, seal may be omitted. Maximum thickness of seal to be 0.5 m.
6. Do not backfill until wall is supported by basement and floor slabs or adequate bracing.
7. Moisture barrier to be at least 200 mm (8") of compacted clear 20 mm (3/4") stone or
equivalent free draining material. A vapour barrier may be required for specialty floors.
8. Basement wall to be damp proofed /water proofed.
9. Exterior grade to slope away from building.
10. Slab on grade should not be structurally connected to the wall or footing.
11. Underfloor drain invert to be at least 300 mm (12") below underside of floor slab.
12. Drainage tile placed in parallel rows 6 to 8 m (20 to 25') centers one way. Place drain
on 100 mm (4") clear stone with 150 mm (6") of clear stone on top and sides. Enclose
stone with filter fabric as noted in (3).
13. The entire subgrade to be sealed with approved filter fabric (Terrafix 270R or equivalent)
if non-cohesive (sandy) soils below ground water table encountered.
14. Do not connect the underfloor drains to perimeter drains.
15. Review the geotechnical report for specific details.

Client: Empire Communities Project No.: 171-17622-00 Drawing No.: 7

Drainage and Backfill Recommendations
Drawn: ZMO Approved: KS Title:
Basement with Underfloor Drainage
Date: February 18, 2018 Scale: N.T.S Project: Geotechnical and Slope Stability Investigation for Proposed Commercial Building,
3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton, ON

Original Rev: N/A 51 Constellation Court

Letter Toornto, Ontario
Size:
M9W 1K4
APPENDIX

A NOTES ON SAMPLE DESCRIPTIONS,

LOGS OF BOREHOLES (BH17-1 TO BH17-4)
EXPLANATION OF TERM USED IN THE RECORD OF BOREHOLES
 LOG OF BOREHOLE BH17-1 1 OF 2

PROJECT: Geotechnical Investigation - REF. NO.: 171-17622-00

CLIENT: Clonard Group Method: Hollow Stem Auger ENCL NO.: 1
PROJECT LOCATION: 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton, ON Diameter: 203 mm ORIGINATED BY Eugen

DATUM: Geodetic Date: Jan/30/2018 COMPILED BY MW

BH LOCATION: See Borehole Location Plan N 4848618.62 E 600653.74 Eqipment: Pontil Drilling CME 55 (Track) CHECKED BY AP
DYNAMIC CONE PENETRATION
SOIL PROFILE SAMPLES RESISTANCE PLOT NATURAL REMARKS

NATURAL UNIT WT
PLASTIC LIQUID

GROUND WATER
MOISTURE

POCKET PEN.
20 40 60 80 100 LIMIT
CONTENT
LIMIT AND

STRATA PLOT
(m)

(Cu) (kPa)
CONDITIONS

(kN/m )
GRAIN SIZE

3
wP w wL

"N" BLOWS

ELEVATION
0.3 m
ELEV SHEAR STRENGTH (kPa) DISTRIBUTION

NUMBER
DEPTH
DESCRIPTION UNCONFINED
FIELD VANE
& Sensitivity (%)
WATER CONTENT (%)

TYPE
QUICK TRIAXIAL LAB VANE
225.40 Ground Surface 20 40 60 80 100 10 20 30 GR SA SI CL
0.00 TOPSOIL: 350mm. Concrete
225.05 Sand
1 SS 8
0.35 FILL: clayey silt, some sand, trace 225
gravel, trace topsoil, brown, moist,
224.64 stiff.
0.76 SILTY CLAY: with silt seams
1
/layers, trace sand, brown, moist to
wet, stiff. 2 SS 13

223.88 224
1.52 SILTY CLAY: trace sand,
occasional gravel, brown to grey,
moist, stiff to very stiff. 3 SS 22 225
2

223
4 SS 22 225 0 4 39 57

contains sand seams at 3.1m

5 SS 24 222 225

221
grey below 4.6m
trace gravel at 4.8m
6 SS 14 150
5

220

Holeplug

7 SS 9 219 75

218

trace gravel at 7.6m

8
8 SS 9 75

217

W. L. 216.70 m
9 Feb 20, 2018
WSP SOIL LOG 2DIG 171-17622-00.GPJ 2/23/18
WSP-SOIL-ROCK-MAY-29-2017.GLB

9 SS 11 216 100

10
Continued Next Page
GRAPH 3, 3 : Numbers refer =3%
GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS Strain at Failure
NOTES to Sensitivity
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
Measurement
 LOG OF BOREHOLE BH17-1 2 OF 2

PROJECT: Geotechnical Investigation - REF. NO.: 171-17622-00

CLIENT: Clonard Group Method: Hollow Stem Auger ENCL NO.: 1
PROJECT LOCATION: 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton, ON Diameter: 203 mm ORIGINATED BY Eugen

DATUM: Geodetic Date: Jan/30/2018 COMPILED BY MW

BH LOCATION: See Borehole Location Plan N 4848618.62 E 600653.74 Eqipment: Pontil Drilling CME 55 (Track) CHECKED BY AP
DYNAMIC CONE PENETRATION
SOIL PROFILE SAMPLES RESISTANCE PLOT NATURAL REMARKS

NATURAL UNIT WT
PLASTIC LIQUID

GROUND WATER
MOISTURE

POCKET PEN.
20 40 60 80 100 LIMIT
CONTENT
LIMIT AND

STRATA PLOT
(m)

(Cu) (kPa)
CONDITIONS

(kN/m )
GRAIN SIZE

3
wP w wL

"N" BLOWS

ELEVATION
0.3 m
ELEV SHEAR STRENGTH (kPa) DISTRIBUTION

NUMBER
DEPTH
DESCRIPTION UNCONFINED
FIELD VANE
& Sensitivity (%)
WATER CONTENT (%)

TYPE
QUICK TRIAXIAL LAB VANE
Continued 20 40 60 80 100 10 20 30 GR SA SI CL
SILTY CLAY: trace sand,
occasional gravel, brown to grey,
moist, stiff to very stiff.(Continued) 215

11
10 SS 15 100

214

12
Auger grinding
Sand from 11.9m to
contains cobble /limestone
213 12.2m
fragments below 11.9m (inferred) 50/
11 NR
275mm

13

212
211.70
13.70 SHALE: grey shale interbedded
14 with siltstone /limestone 70/
12 SS Screen
150mm

211

15

210
50/
13 SS
209.55 75mm
15.85 END OF BOREHOLE
Note
1) 50mm dia. monitoring well was
installed at 12.5 m after completion.

Water Level Readings:

Date W.L.Depth (m)
Feb 20, 2018 8.70
WSP SOIL LOG 2DIG 171-17622-00.GPJ 2/23/18
WSP-SOIL-ROCK-MAY-29-2017.GLB

GRAPH 3, 3 : Numbers refer =3%

GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS Strain at Failure
NOTES to Sensitivity
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
Measurement
 LOG OF BOREHOLE BH17-2 1 OF 2

PROJECT: Geotechnical Investigation - REF. NO.: 171-17622-00

CLIENT: Clonard Group Method: Hollow Stem Auger ENCL NO.: 2
PROJECT LOCATION: 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton, ON Diameter: 203 mm ORIGINATED BY Eugen

DATUM: Geodetic Date: Jan/29/2018 COMPILED BY MW

BH LOCATION: See Borehole Location Plan N 4848617.91 E 600679.02 Eqipment: Pontil Drilling CME 55 (Track) CHECKED BY AP
DYNAMIC CONE PENETRATION
SOIL PROFILE SAMPLES RESISTANCE PLOT NATURAL REMARKS

NATURAL UNIT WT
PLASTIC LIQUID

GROUND WATER
MOISTURE

POCKET PEN.
20 40 60 80 100 LIMIT
CONTENT
LIMIT AND

STRATA PLOT
(m)

(Cu) (kPa)
CONDITIONS

(kN/m )
GRAIN SIZE

3
wP w wL

"N" BLOWS

ELEVATION
0.3 m
ELEV SHEAR STRENGTH (kPa) DISTRIBUTION

NUMBER
DEPTH
DESCRIPTION UNCONFINED
FIELD VANE
& Sensitivity (%)
WATER CONTENT (%)

TYPE
QUICK TRIAXIAL LAB VANE
225.55 Ground Surface 20 40 60 80 100 10 20 30 GR SA SI CL
0.00 FILL: sand and gravel, brown, Concrete
moist, compact. 1T SS Sand
225.17 11
0.38 FILL: silty clay, trace sand, trace 1B SS
gravel, brown, moist, stiff. 225
224.79
0.76 SILTY CLAY: with silt seams
1 /layers, trace sand, brown, moist to
wet, firm. 2 SS 6

224.03
1.52 SILTY CLAY: trace sand, 224
occasional gravel, brown to grey,
moist, very stiff to stiff. 3 SS 20 225
2

4 SS 19 223 225

5 SS 18 225

222

221
grey below 4.6m
6 SS 9
5

220

Holeplug

7 SS 9 100 0 9 38 53
219

218

8
8 SS 12 100

217

9 W. L. 216.71 m
Feb 20, 2018
WSP SOIL LOG 2DIG 171-17622-00.GPJ 2/23/18
WSP-SOIL-ROCK-MAY-29-2017.GLB

9 SS 15 125
216

10
Continued Next Page
GRAPH 3, 3 : Numbers refer =3%
GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS Strain at Failure
NOTES to Sensitivity
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
Measurement
 LOG OF BOREHOLE BH17-2 2 OF 2

PROJECT: Geotechnical Investigation - REF. NO.: 171-17622-00

CLIENT: Clonard Group Method: Hollow Stem Auger ENCL NO.: 2
PROJECT LOCATION: 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton, ON Diameter: 203 mm ORIGINATED BY Eugen

DATUM: Geodetic Date: Jan/29/2018 COMPILED BY MW

BH LOCATION: See Borehole Location Plan N 4848617.91 E 600679.02 Eqipment: Pontil Drilling CME 55 (Track) CHECKED BY AP
DYNAMIC CONE PENETRATION
SOIL PROFILE SAMPLES RESISTANCE PLOT NATURAL REMARKS

NATURAL UNIT WT
PLASTIC LIQUID

GROUND WATER
MOISTURE

POCKET PEN.
20 40 60 80 100 LIMIT
CONTENT
LIMIT AND

STRATA PLOT
(m)

(Cu) (kPa)
CONDITIONS

(kN/m )
GRAIN SIZE

3
wP w wL

"N" BLOWS

ELEVATION
0.3 m
ELEV SHEAR STRENGTH (kPa) DISTRIBUTION

NUMBER
DEPTH
DESCRIPTION UNCONFINED
FIELD VANE
& Sensitivity (%)
WATER CONTENT (%)

TYPE
QUICK TRIAXIAL LAB VANE
Continued 20 40 60 80 100 10 20 30 GR SA SI CL
SILTY CLAY: trace sand,
occasional gravel, brown to grey,
moist, very stiff to stiff.(Continued)
215

11
10 SS 24 200

214
213.85
11.70 SANDY SILT: trace gravel, trace
12 clay, grey, moist to saturated, very
dense.
Sand
wet sampler
11 SS 90 0 26 70 4
213

13

212.35
13.20 SILTY CLAY: sandy, some gravel,
grey, moist, hard.
212

14
12 SS 64 Screen >225

211

210.55
15
15.00 SILTY SAND: trace gravel, trace
clay, grey, saturated, very dense

210
90/
13 SS
275mm
209.55
16
16.00 END OF BOREHOLE
Note
1) 50mm dia. monitoring well was
installed at 12.5 m after completion.

Water Level Readings:

Date W.L.Depth (m)
Feb 20, 2018 8.84
WSP SOIL LOG 2DIG 171-17622-00.GPJ 2/23/18
WSP-SOIL-ROCK-MAY-29-2017.GLB

GRAPH 3, 3 : Numbers refer =3%

GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS Strain at Failure
NOTES to Sensitivity
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
Measurement
 LOG OF BOREHOLE BH17-3 1 OF 1

PROJECT: Geotechnical Investigation - REF. NO.: 171-17622-00

CLIENT: Clonard Group Method: Solid Stem Auger ENCL NO.: 3
PROJECT LOCATION: 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton, ON Diameter: 115 mm ORIGINATED BY Eugen

DATUM: Geodetic Date: Jan/30/2018 COMPILED BY MW

BH LOCATION: See Borehole Location Plan N 4848592.33 E 600645.77 Eqipment: Pontil Drilling CME 55 (Track) CHECKED BY AP
DYNAMIC CONE PENETRATION
SOIL PROFILE SAMPLES RESISTANCE PLOT NATURAL REMARKS

NATURAL UNIT WT
PLASTIC LIQUID

GROUND WATER
MOISTURE

POCKET PEN.
20 40 60 80 100 LIMIT
CONTENT
LIMIT AND

STRATA PLOT
(m)

(Cu) (kPa)
CONDITIONS

(kN/m )
GRAIN SIZE

3
wP w wL

"N" BLOWS

ELEVATION
0.3 m
ELEV SHEAR STRENGTH (kPa) DISTRIBUTION

NUMBER
DEPTH
DESCRIPTION UNCONFINED
FIELD VANE
& Sensitivity (%)
WATER CONTENT (%)

TYPE
QUICK TRIAXIAL LAB VANE
225.72 Ground Surface 20 40 60 80 100 10 20 30 GR SA SI CL
0.00 TOPSOIL: 350mm.
225.37 1 SS 9
0.35 FILL: silty clay, trace sand, trace
topsoil, dark brown, moist, stiff.
224.96 225
0.76 SILTY CLAY: with silt seams
1 /layers, trace sand, brown, moist to
wet, stiff. 2 SS 10

224.20
1.52 SILTY CLAY: trace sand,
occasional gravel, brown to grey, 224
moist, stiff to very stiff. 3 SS 25 >225
2

4 SS 15 225
223
3

brownish grey below 3.1m

5 SS 14 225

222
4

221
6 SS 9 50
5

220
6

grey below 6.4m

7 SS 9 219 50

218.72
7
7.00 END OF BOREHOLE
Note:
1) Borehole was dry upon
completion.
WSP SOIL LOG 2DIG 171-17622-00.GPJ 2/23/18
WSP-SOIL-ROCK-MAY-29-2017.GLB

GRAPH 3, 3 : Numbers refer =3%

GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS Strain at Failure
NOTES to Sensitivity
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
Measurement
 LOG OF BOREHOLE BH17-4 1 OF 1

PROJECT: Geotechnical Investigation - REF. NO.: 171-17622-00

CLIENT: Clonard Group Method: Solid Stem Auger ENCL NO.: 4
PROJECT LOCATION: 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton, ON Diameter: 115 mm ORIGINATED BY Eugen

DATUM: Geodetic Date: Jan/29/2018 COMPILED BY MW

BH LOCATION: See Borehole Location Plan N 4848606.73 E 600678.89 Eqipment: Pontil Drilling CME 55 (Track) CHECKED BY AP
DYNAMIC CONE PENETRATION
SOIL PROFILE SAMPLES RESISTANCE PLOT NATURAL REMARKS

NATURAL UNIT WT
PLASTIC LIQUID

GROUND WATER
MOISTURE

POCKET PEN.
20 40 60 80 100 LIMIT
CONTENT
LIMIT AND

STRATA PLOT
(m)

(Cu) (kPa)
CONDITIONS

(kN/m )
GRAIN SIZE

3
wP w wL

"N" BLOWS

ELEVATION
0.3 m
ELEV SHEAR STRENGTH (kPa) DISTRIBUTION

NUMBER
DEPTH
DESCRIPTION UNCONFINED
FIELD VANE
& Sensitivity (%)
WATER CONTENT (%)

TYPE
QUICK TRIAXIAL LAB VANE
225.89 Ground Surface 20 40 60 80 100 10 20 30 GR SA SI CL
0.00 TOPSOIL: 300mm.
225.59
1 SS 13
0.30 FILL: silty clay, trace sand seams,
trace gravel, trace topsoil, brown,
moist, stiff.

1
225
2 SS 8

224.37
1.52 SILTY CLAY: trace sand, trace
gravel, brown to grey, moist, stiff to
very stiff 3 SS 25 >225
2
224

4 SS 21 225

3
223

5 SS 18 225

4
222

grey below 4.6m

6 SS 16 221 100
5

6
220

7 SS 10 50

218.89
7
219
7.00 END OF BOREHOLE
Note:
1) Borehole was dry upon
completion.
WSP SOIL LOG 2DIG 171-17622-00.GPJ 2/23/18
WSP-SOIL-ROCK-MAY-29-2017.GLB

GRAPH 3, 3 : Numbers refer =3%

GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS Strain at Failure
NOTES to Sensitivity
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
Measurement
APPENDIX

B GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVES AND

ATTERBERG LIMITS TESTS RESULTS
 Particle Size Distribution Report

0.315

0.075
1.25

0.63

0.16
2.5
80

56

40

28

20

14

10

5
100

90

80

70
PERCENT FINER

60

50

40

30

20

10

0
100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001

GRAIN SIZE - mm.

% Gravel % Sand % Fines
% +3"
Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Silt Clay
0 0 0 0 1 3 39 57

SIEVE PERCENT SPEC.* PASS? Soil Description

SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) Silty Clay
9.50 100
4.75 100
2.00 100
0.85 99
0.425 99
Atterberg Limits
0.250 98 PL= 18 LL= 40 PI= 22
0.150 97
0.106 97 Coefficients
0.075 96 D90= 0.0174 D85= 0.0087 D60= 0.0022
0.0353 mm. 93 D50= 0.0015 D30= D15=
0.0252 mm. 92 D10= C u= Cc=
0.0161 mm. 90
0.0095 mm. 86 Classification
0.0068 mm. 82 USCS= CL AASHTO= A-6(22)
0.0049 mm. 77
0.0026 mm. 63 Remarks
0.0012 mm. 43

* (no specification provided)

Source of Sample: Site Drilling

Sample Number: 17-1_SS4 Date: Feb.14, 2018
Client: Clonard Group
Project: 3024 Countryside Drive

Project No: 171-17622-00 Figure 1

Tested By: Bruce Shan

 Particle Size Distribution Report

0.315

0.075
1.25

0.63

0.16
2.5
80

56

40

28

20

14

10

5
100

90

80

70
PERCENT FINER

60

50

40

30

20

10

0
100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001

GRAIN SIZE - mm.

% Gravel % Sand % Fines
% +3"
Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Silt Clay
0 0 0 2 2 5 38 53

SIEVE PERCENT SPEC.* PASS? Soil Description

SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) Silty Clay
9.50 100
4.75 100
2.00 98
0.85 97
0.425 96
Atterberg Limits
0.250 95 PL= 19 LL= 39 PI= 20
0.150 93
0.106 92 Coefficients
0.075 91 D90= 0.0653 D85= 0.0252 D60= 0.0027
0.0363 mm. 87 D50= 0.0017 D30= D15=
0.0259 mm. 85 D10= C u= Cc=
0.0167 mm. 82
0.0099 mm. 77 Classification
0.0071 mm. 74 USCS= CL AASHTO= A-6(19)
0.0051 mm. 70
0.0026 mm. 59 Remarks
0.0012 mm. 40

* (no specification provided)

Source of Sample: Site Drilling

Sample Number: 17-2_SS7 Date: Feb.14, 2018
Client: Clonard Group
Project: 3024 Countryside Drive

Project No: 171-17622-00 Figure 2

Tested By: Bruce Shan

 Particle Size Distribution Report

0.315

0.075
1.25

0.63

0.16
2.5
80

56

40

28

20

14

10

5
100

90

80

70
PERCENT FINER

60

50

40

30

20

10

0
100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001

GRAIN SIZE - mm.

% Gravel % Sand % Fines
% +3"
Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Silt Clay
0 0 0 1 1 24 70 4

SIEVE PERCENT SPEC.* PASS? Soil Description

SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) Silt with Sand
9.50 100
4.75 100
2.00 99
0.85 99
0.425 98
Atterberg Limits
0.250 98 PL= LL= PI=
0.150 96
0.106 89 Coefficients
0.075 74 D90= 0.1080 D85= 0.0933 D60= 0.0597
0.0444 mm. 42 D50= 0.0511 D30= 0.0308 D15= 0.0149
0.0326 mm. 31 D10= 0.0093 Cu= 6.39 Cc= 1.70
0.0213 mm. 21
0.0126 mm. 13 Classification
0.0090 mm. 9.7 USCS= AASHTO=
0.0064 mm. 8.0
0.0031 mm. 5.8 Remarks
0.0013 mm. 3.0

* (no specification provided)

Source of Sample: Site Drilling

Sample Number: 17-2_SS11 Date: Feb.14, 2018
Client: Clonard Group
Project: 3024 Countryside Drive

Project No: 171-17622-00 Figure 3

Tested By: Bruce Shan

 60

LEGEND

BH17-1 SS 4
BH17-2 SS 7

50

CH

40
PLASTICITY INDEX (%)

CI

30

CL

20

MH OR OH
10

CL - ML
MI OR OI
ML
0
ML OR OL
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
LIQUID LIMIT (%)

FIGURE NO. 4
PLASTICITY CHART JOB NO. 171-17622-00
DATE Feb. 16, 2013
APPENDIX

C SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES RESULTS

 Safety Factor
1.20
1.35
1.50
1.65
250

1.80
Unit Weight Cohesion Phi
Material Name Color Strength Type
(kN/m3) (kPa) (deg) 1.95

Fill 19.5 Mohr-Coulomb 1 26 2.10

2.25
Silty Clay (S ff to Very S ff) 20 Mohr-Coulomb 19 27
240

2.40
Silty Clay (Hard) 21 Mohr-Coulomb 22 29
1.81
2.55

Sandy Silt/Silty Sand (Very Dense) 22 Mohr-Coulomb 0 36 2.70

2.85
3.00+
230

2.3
H
(Ex orz. :
istin 1
g S Vert.
lop
e In
clin
atio
220

n)
W

W
210

-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Project
Geotechnical and Slope Stability Investigation for Proposed Building, 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton, ON
Analysis Description
Section A-A' (Existing): GLE\Morgenstern-Price Limit Equilibrium Method
Drawing No. Scale Company
C1 1:370 WSP Canada Inc.
Date File Name
SLIDEINTERPRET 7.031
February 23, 2018 Section A-A' (Existing)
 Safety Factor
1.20
1.35
250

Unit Weight Cohesion Phi 1.50

Material Name Color Strength Type
(kN/m3) (kPa) (deg) 1.65
Fill 19.5 Mohr-Coulomb 1 26 1.80
1.95
Silty Clay (S ff to Very S ff) 20 Mohr-Coulomb 19 27
2.10
240

Silty Clay (Hard) 21 Mohr-Coulomb 22 29 2.25

1.68
Sandy Silt/Silty Sand (Very Dense) 22 Mohr-Coulomb 0 36 2.40
2.55
2.70
230

2.85
Exi
stin
gSl o 3.00+
pe
Inc
lina
2H tion
orz
(H y .:1
pot
het Vert.
ical
Sl o
220

pe
W Inc
lina
tion
)
W
210
200

-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Project
Geotechnical and Slope Stability Investigation for Proposed Building, 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton, ON
Analysis Description
Section A-A' (2H : 1V): GLE\Morgenstern-Price Limit Equilibrium Method
Drawing No. Scale Company
C2 1:370 WSP Canada Inc.
Date File Name
SLIDEINTERPRET 7.031
February 23, 2018 Section A-A' (2H : 1V)
 Safety Factor
1.20
250

1.35

Unit Weight Cohesion Phi 1.50

Material Name Color Strength Type
(kN/m3) (kPa) (deg) 1.65

Fill 19.5 Mohr-Coulomb 1 26 1.80

1.95
Silty Clay (S ff to Very S ff) 20 Mohr-Coulomb 19 27
240

2.10
Silty Clay (Hard) 21 Mohr-Coulomb 22 29 1.51 2.25

Sandy Silt/Silty Sand (Very Dense) 22 Mohr-Coulomb 0 36 2.40

2.55
2.70
230

Exi 2.85
stin
gSl o 3.00+
pe
Inc
lina
W 2H tion
o
(Hy rz. : 1
pot
het Vert.
ical
Sl o
220

pe
Inc
lina
tion
)
W
210
200

-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Project
Geotechnical and Slope Stability Investigation for Proposed Building, 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton, ON
Analysis Description
Section A-A' (2H : 1V, Elevated Water Level): GLE\Morgenstern-Price Limit Equilibrium Method
Drawing No. Scale Company
C3 1:360 WSP Canada Inc.
Date File Name
SLIDEINTERPRET 7.031
February 23, 2018 Section A-A' (2H : 1V, Elevated Water Level)
APPENDIX

D SITE VISIT PHOTOGRAPHS (TO BE READ IN

CONJUCTION WITH DRAWING 1)
Figure 1: An overall aerial view of the site and slope. The tableland is relatively flat and is associated with 10 to 12m high
northly slope. Slope, within the study area, extends between Airport Road and Countryside Drive and is about 200 m in length.
On the north side, the site slopes downward to the floodplains of a creek (a tributary of Humber River). The creek meanders in
the floodplain, and and at two locations, comes in contact with the slope toe.

Figure 2: A view of tableland, looking east. The site currently includes a one storey building. The ground was snow
covered at the time of inspection.

Geotechnical and Slope Stability Investigation for Proposed Commercial Building, 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton, ON
Project No. 171-17622-00
Clonard Group
Figure 3: Looking east at the snow covered slope surface. Slope is well vegetated / forested.

Figure 4: Looking down (north) at the slope surface. Slope surface is well vegetated with grass, weed, shrubs and
young to mature trees. Creek is visible in the background.

Geotechnical and Slope Stability Investigation for Proposed Commercial Building, 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton, ON
Project No. 171-17622-00
Clonard Group
Figure 5: Another view of snow covered slope surface.

Figure 6: One more view of slope surface.

Geotechnical and Slope Stability Investigation for Proposed Commercial Building, 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton, ON
Project No. 171-17622-00
Clonard Group
Figure 7: Looking northwest at the tableland and slope crest.

Figure 8: Looking west along the flood plain. The creek meanders within the flood plain.

Geotechnical and Slope Stability Investigation for Proposed Commercial Building, 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton, ON
Project No. 171-17622-00
Clonard Group
Figure 9: Looking east along the flood plain and meandering creek.

Figure 10: A close-up view of the creek in contact with the toe of the slope.

Geotechnical and Slope Stability Investigation for Proposed Commercial Building, 3024 Countryside Drive, Brampton, ON
Project No. 171-17622-00
Clonard Group