a a Ni alcatel JPL D - 5882 MASS ACCELERATION CURVE FOR SPACECRAFT STRUCTURAL DESIGN Marc Trubert November 1, 1989 National Aeronautics and Space Administration JPL Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CaliforniaJPL D - 5882 MASS ACCELERATION CURVE FOR SPACECRAFT STRUCTURAL DESIGN Marc Trubert November 1, 1989 National Aeronautics and Space Administration JPL Jet Propilsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CaliforniaSUMMARY ‘This report presents the philosophy of the Mass Acceleration Curve as it has been developed over many years at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory for the preliminary design of Spacecraft. The concept of the Mass Acceleration Curve has been in existence for great many years but because of its semi-empirical nature, the documentation of it in a formal report is at best a difficult task. Originally the curve (MAC) was applied only to physical masses for the very preliminary design of subsystems of a payload. The extension of the curve to the effective masses (modal masses) of payload models has made the curve much more attractive and useful. This report presents “some” mathematical justification of the curve although the author fully realizes that it is only an attempt and that no rigorous proof has been found. The curve in its advanced form (MDMAC) is an extremely useful tool that allows the Loads Engineer to obtain very quickly and inexpensively (for example with the use of a PC) the preliminary loads in every member of a payload (Spacecraft and/or substructures) so that the Stress Engineer can proceed with his sizing of the members. In its advanced form the usage of the curve requires a finite element model of the structure to be created, however a very crude model will suffice, the important thing being that resonant frequencies are present in the model and that they account for a large portion of the rigid mass (say 908). This remark is really not specific to the Mass Acceleration Curve but it is true for any Loads analysis, it simply says that the model must be representative of the flexible dynamics of the structure. Examples of the application of the curve to practical structures are given in the report, with emphasis put on the advanced form. However, the original MAC for physical masses should be used for initial sizing and can continue to be used for many applications where finite element models are not constructed. At present it is believed that the advanced curve (MDMAC) is most useful for preliminary design and that a more sophisticated analysis is still required for a complete optimum and Light weight design of the payload. However, an abbreviated approach using only the advanced curve (MDMAC) for final sizing is suggested as a viable option. The extra structural weight due to this approach is not expected to be severe. In any event a pre-flight verification traditional coupled Transient analysis of the Launch Vehicle/Payload system must remain as a requirement for flight acceptance.ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Special recognition is given to Robert Bamford of Section 354 at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory who some tventy years ago pioneered the idea of using the Mass Acceleration Curve for preliminary design of space structures. The author is also indebted to numerous members of the staff of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory for their constant support and encouragement in the use of the curve for so many projects. Specific individuals among others who have helped formalize this report with their comments, supports and interests are: F. Tillman, J. Staats, G. Wang, C. Larson, X. Smith, W. Walton, J. Garba, B. Wada, R. Galletly, M. Lou, P. Rapacz of Section 354 and W. Layman of Section 352. The work described in this report was performed by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. itTABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION . poet eee ow 2. MATHEMATICAL DERIVATIONS ... a0 5 2.1, General the Ma 2.2 vation of Equat rf 2.3. ensio 20a. Wehicle/Payload_In 2.5 is using the 2.6 ‘or Estimating Lo: 2.7 ‘and Momes :2.2. Torsional Moment: 3.3. i ads for a Cor -3.1. Accelerations and Member Loads: 3.2 4. ABBREVIATED LOADS ANALYSIS FOR CONSERVATIVE DESIGN . 5. PHYSICAL MASS ACCELERATION CURVE (MAC) 6. REFERENCES . APPENDIX A. TITAN 4 TYPICAL THRUST DECAY STAGE 1 BURNOUT .. APPENDIX B. DATA FOR PAYLOAD SUBSYSTEM - GALILEO THRUSTER BOOM ULLAGE TANK . APPENDIX C, OUTPUT DATA FOR GALILEO TITAN 4/IUS iitFigure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure 10. ul. 12. 3. + STS/IUS/Galileo Modal Mass Acceleration Curve .... LIST OF FIGURES peeeeere2 . Titan 4/IUS Modal Mass Acceleration Curve ...... rey as . Schematic Launch Vehicle/Spacecraft System .... , of Simplified Two-mass model for Launch Vehicle/Spacecraft System .. 6 Tip Mass Response . -8 ; Schematic Mass Acceleration Curve for a Tip Mass .9 + Modal Mass Acceleration Curve (MDMAC) - Galileo Modes Low and Midfrequency - Titan 4/IUS Liftoff and Stage 1 Depletion (GSS Analysis) and Equivalent Random . te -u . Payload Subsystem - Galileo Thruster Boom Ullage Tank . 18 . Model for Preliminary Interface Loads . . 22 Abbreviated Loads Analysis ........ = 30 Physical Mass Acceleration Curve for STS/IUS ....... - 32 Physical Mass Acceleration Curve for Titan 4/TUS .... 33 Single Mass Appendage for Physical MAC .... . MMTable 1. Table 2. Table 3. Table 4, Table 5. Table 6. Table 7. Table 8. Table 9. Table 10. LIST OF TABLES Bounds UDD; for Titan 4/IUS/GLL Interface Accelerations . Bounds UDD; for STS/IUS/GLL Interface Accelerations 13 Effective masses for Payload Subsystem ......, 5 .19 Accelerations for Payload Subsystem .... ceeeee - 20 Member Loads for Payload Subsystem .. + 20 Input Data for Interface Forces and Bending Moments . +23 Preliminary Interface Forces and Moments . + GLL Member Loads - TITAN 4/IUS MDMAC Forcing Function ..... - 26 GLL Accelerations - TITAN 4/IUS MDMAC Forcing Function .. 27 Inertia (Craig-Bampton) Interface Forces and Moments ... - 281. INTRODUCTION The concept of the Mass Acceleration Curve has been successfully used at JPL for a number of years for the preliminary structural design of several JPL planetary Spacecraft (Mariners, Voyager, Galileo, Mars Observer and others). The concept was mentioned in Ref. 1 first as a preliminary design tool then as a useful alternate to estimate mid-frequency loads of Galileo. This report is an extension of the latter to cover the entire structurally significant frequency range of the Spacecraft, low and mid-frequency. Reference 2 is a companion report which presents an example showing how the curve(s) can be constructed. Reference 1 contains general information useful for better understanding the content of this report. Briefly it has been observed that the acceleration of physical masses of a Spacecraft are bounded by a curve, the Mass Acceleration Curve (MAC). The lighter the mass the higher the corresponding acceleration. To this date the MAC still remains a semi-empirical concept. It is important to remind ourselves at the beginning that the concept of the Mass Acceleration Curve deals with a bound, and as such it is not a simulation of the actual responses. As a result of our past experience and present thinking there are two Mass Acceleration Curves: 1. A curve corresponding to the physical masses of the Spacecraft, this is called the Physical Mass Acceleration Curve (MAC). This curve is chronologically the oldest, it is used for the very preliminary design of subsystems of the Spacecraft when detail finite element models and corresponding modal models are not available, 2. An advanced curve corresponding to the acceleration of the effective mass of each mode of the Spacecraft, this is called the Modal Mass Acceleration Curve (MDMAC). This curve is used as a Forcing Function applied to the model of the Spacecraft or the models of its subsystems as soon as such models are available. The MDMAC is a powerful outgrowth of the original idea of the MAC because it provides an “envelop” Forcing Function that can be used to estimate the loads (forces and stresses) in every member of the Payload*. The significant characteristic of the Mass Acceleration Curve (MAC and/or MDMAG) is that it provides a simple, quick and cost effective engineering tool for the design (preliminary and/or updated) and the sizing of a new payload, at the beginning of the design when coupled transient analysis is not yet available for the Launch Vehicle/Payload system. Figure 1 shows the Modal Mass Acceleration Curve used for the design of the Galileo Spacecraft for the Shuttle/IUS launch vehicle and Fig. 2 the Modal Mass Acceleration Curve generated for the Titan/IUS Launch Vehicle. % In this report Spacecraft and Payload are synonymous. 1oopoe «oa Bobet eaang LI19/SaI/S4s “1 eandyg Ola och le ocne z pte z B19, jf Ht 4 ez SS L | : ae nN | 7 TTT | [ : CoH So ch : 8 SHH — 101 | | P| |. {4 | | [--—, + 1 ' 1 + + ‘ | | T 8 L L ‘ol (82z€1= AS “09 “1=09) 1H00W 9) Nor1uu37399N (2 ay)aang UoFIPAETSIOV SSEH TEPOH SNI/y UeITL °% AnFTE (9x) SSUH 3A11939343 pe 2 @ia 9¢ th € Z@ Wie gach 6 2% Play A 14 } | 4 ’ a s . 9 8 = L J 01 (GGH9Z=AS ‘Gh 1-09) 1UGOW 1 4 1 1 ‘ 1 i 1 ' 1 a ‘ 9) NOT1uu37399UThe second curve, the MDMAC, will be addresséd first and will form the bulk of this report because it is the most rational and the most useful. interested only in the phy go directly to Sec. 5. The reader sical curve can skip the beginning of the report and To some readers, the concept of the Mass Acceleration Curve may seem mathematically unattractive because of the large amount of judgment still involved in its derivation and use. To that effect, let us remind ourselves here that because of the large uncertainties in the knowledge of the Spacecraft and Launch Vehicle structures and the external Forcing Functions, loads analysis is far from being an exact science. Engineering judgment aimed at establishing worst cases must remain our primary concern. Particularly if there is no loads data available, which happens often at the beginning of a project, it is the job of the Loads Engineer to use his experienceto make a best guess at the missing data so that the project can proceed with the design.2. MATHEMATICAL DERIVATIONS 2.1. General Equations for the Mass Acceleration Curve: Originally the bound of the acceleration A of a Spacecraft component of mass m was taken as being inversely proportional to the square root of the mass: an Ka ay where K was an empirical coefficient so that Eq. (1). envelops the available data. Equation (1) is the original Bamford’s curve. As a result of the effort to explain the square root dependency of Eq. (1) it became obvious that the damping also had an effect on the load, especially for the "light" masses. Consequently the equation relating the bound of acceleration to its corresponding mass was re-formulated-as follows: Go A- e-@/tan(a) (2) Jane +5460)? @ = tan“) et @) Esthe where A, m, 5 are the bound of acceleration, the effective mass and the damping of a Spacecraft node £2 is the damping of a Launch Vehicle mode Go, M are coefficients so that Eq. (2) envelops the available data. e = 2.718281828... 2.2. Dei on of Equat Figure 3 shows a schematic representation of the Launch Vehicle/Spacecraft coupled analysis problem in which the Forcing Function F(t) and spacecraft response a(t) are multidimensional. Forcing Spacecratt Farcton jy Launch Spacecraft | ye Response {F(t)} Vehicle fa(t)} Interface Figure 3. Schematic Launch Vehicle/Spacecraft System 5The response a(t) is usually computed using a modal analysis and a corresponding forced response analysis. In these analyses the relative impedance between the Spacecraft and the Launch Vehicle can have a significant effect on the response when one Spacecraft mode with a large effective mass happens to be "tuned" to one launch Vehicle mode with an effective mass in the same order of magnitude as that of the Spacecraft. To better understand that effect let us consider the very simplified model of two staggered masses as shown in Fig..4. In this figure model B is mathematically equivalent to the more physical model A. In model B: a) The Launch Vehicle is a free-free model with one resonant frequency wp b) The Spacecraft is supported by the’ Launch Vehicle, it is attached at the Launch Vehicle/Spacecraft interface and has one resonant frequency wg. c) The effective mass of the Spacecraft mode and the Launch Vehicle mode are m and M respectively. 4) The Forcing Function F(t) is reduced to a unit impulse 5(t) of strength Fo. This model is simply intended to establish a trend for a worse case bound A of the Spacecraft acceleration a(t). oy x(e) fs Fo6(t) me x(t) 7 4 Model B F(t) Figure 4. Simplified Two-mass model for Launch Vehicle/Spacecraft System 6Calling x(t) the relative displacement of m with respect to M and X(t) the absolute displacement of M, the equations of motion are: (Lem/ADE + (MAK + Boye pK + wHX - 0 «© K+ K+ 2weegk + wx - 0 «) The solution of this system with the initial conditions created by Fos(t) is straight forvard and was carried out for the parametric variation of the mass ratio m/M, the frequency ratio (tuning) wy/vs, Spacecraft and Launch Vehicle dampings £5 and ég. Case A of Fig. 5 shows the response’ of the Spacecraft mass m when this mass is Infinitely small as compared to the Launch Vehicle mass M, mass ratio m/M - 0. Case b shows the response to the same impulse, damping and tuning when mass m is a finite fraction of the Launch Vehicle mass M, mass ratio m/M = .01. The ‘two cases show a reduction of the maximum peak amplitude from 9.3 for case A for the negligeable Spacecraft mass m, to 5.7 for case b for a non-negligeable mass which is only 18 of the Launch Vehicle effective mass. The ratio ATTEN - 5.7/9.3 of theses peaks represents the attenuation of the bound of the Spacecraft response due to the dynamic interaction between Launch Vehicle and Spacecraft. This is the well known dynamic absorber effect. Algebraic manipulation done in Ref. 3 for the solution of Eqs. (4) and (5) to establish an all inclusive envelop (bound) shows that this envelop is for the tuned case wy = us. In addition it also shows that the sum ég+€) of the Spacecraft damping and Launch Vehicle damping is the key parameter, instead of each damping separately. The latter, in itself, is a remarkable conclusion The bound of acceleration is calculated by Eqs. (2) and (3) above. Figure 6 displays schematically the drop of the response (bound) for the small tip mass m resulting from loading the large mass M supporting the small tip mass m. This drop is from a level Ao, the traditional shock spectra of the unloaded mass M, to a level A as the mass ratio a/M is increased from zero to its actual value.0 an M Tuned case wy =o Figure 5. Tip Mass Response zBJPu Shock spectra level j* unloaded mass M Impedance attenuation Go (Estes) Envelope for acceleration A Reduced bound for acceleration 0 _ Mass Ratio m/M Figure 6. Schematic Mass Acceleration Curve for a Tip Mass2.3, Heuristic Extension to a Spacecraft: A real Spacecraft/Launch Vehicle system is not at all as simple as shown in Fig. 4. At this stage of thinking the dynamist is guided by his experience and judgment and can simply say that, statistically, it is likely that a Spacecraft mode will be nearly tuned to a Launch Vehicle mode. If the mode of the Spacecraft involves only a local component of very small mass the bound of its response will be like Ag of Fig. 6, but if the Spacecraft mode involves a major component with a large mass, the response of that component will behave like A. If the mode involves the entire Spacecraft, like a first bending, the response will be that of the sum of the masses of the component involved i.e the effective mass of that mode. The conceptual model B in Fig. 4 suggests that it best applies to each modal mass (effective mass) of the Spacecraft which is directly "connected" to the interface (Ref..1,..sec..3.2), rather thar to a physical mass, which is not directly connected to the interface (for example the physical mass may have other masses between itself and the interface). Figure 7, extracted from Ref. 2, shows a plot of analytically determined bounds of the acceleration of effective masses of the Galileo Spacecraft for a Titan 4/IUS launch. This plot is a combination of Generalized Shock Spectra analysis for Liftoff and Stage 1 depletion and equivalent Random analysis. The curve enveloping these data was constructed using Eqs. (2) and (3), the parameters are: Go= 1.45 Gs M = 12000.0 Ke &,- -010 & = -010 The enveloping curve is called the Modal Mass Acceleration Curve (MDMAC). Figure 2 is a re-plot of the Figure 7 without the data points. It is noted that it is not necessary to use Eqs. (2) and (3) to construct the enveloping curve of Fig. 7, indeed any curve even a hand drawn curve would be appropriate the only requirement is that the curve must envelop the data. It is simply “convenient” to use Eqs. (2) and (3). An advantage of Eqs. (2) and (3) is that they contain the damping parameters than can be easily changed depending on the knowledge of the structures. The parameters for the STS/IUS curve of Fig. 1 are: Go= 1.60 G's M = 6000.0 KG és - .010 & = .010 10dle wopuey queyPaynby pue (stsXteuy sso) uoyre{deq 1 efeag pue 3303377 sAI/y UerTL ouanber3PTH PUB OT SEPOH COTTTED - (OVHGH) eAIND UOTIPIOTeD9y sseH TepoH “Z ean3Ta 9X NI 300H U3d SSUN 341193493 gOlo oc» € z le sch ec 2 z Ole 9 1] ULUO 68/EZ/B :Gh°1-O9°C(ZH Oh AOJGNUYOGVOT BB89NW119 7 1 1 moos ' ' 1 ' ' ooo ' y ' 9) NOILWHIT399N 3A11939453 un2.4, Launch Vehicle/Payload 1 elerations: As shown in Ref. 1 (Sec. 3.1.9) the calculation of the physical loads (accelerations and member loads) requires interface data for the quasi-static contribution (which is small in general) and elastic modal data for the purely dynamic contribution (which is large in general). The MDMAC provides the latter. In order to keep the small quasi-static contribution manageable the Launch Vehicle/Spacecraft interface is assumed to be statically determinate i.e. 6 degrees of freedom are sufficient to describe its motion and there are 6 rigid body modes for the Payload for which only interface accelerations are needed. This restriction will affect only the distortion loads in the local neighborhood of the interface. It has no significant effect on any part of the Payload away from that interface. The local distortion loads are in fact not a dynamic problem, as such there is little hope to obtain them using the Mass Acceleration Curve which. is. established from-the'purely dynamtc~ part’ of the modal responses. Thése distorticn loads can be handled by a static analysis which must include the stiffness of the upper part of the Launch Vehicle Upper Stage in addition to the stiffness of the lower part of the Payload. Then, these distortion loads can be added to the dynamic loads. Table 1 below shows the bounds for the Launch Vehicle/Payload interface accelerations as obtained from the Titan 4/IUS/Galileo analysis in Ref. 2. Table 1. Bounds UDD; for Titan 4/IUS/GLL Interface Accelerations Bounds Dofs upp, Thrust x he 6 y | 1.48 ¢ z | 4.53 ¢ 3.9 6 Theta X |.024 G/in 945 G/a Theta Y |.010 G/in 396 G/a Theta Z |.025 G/in 986 G/m 12‘The interface accelerations for the STS/IUS are in Table 2. 5 Table 2. Bounds UDD; for STS/IUS/GLL Interface Accelerations " Bounds Dofs - DD; ‘Thrust - x 40 G : Y Li2zi ¢ } 2 3.19 G 15 6 = Theta X | .007%6 G/in .291 G/m Theta ¥ | 10037 G/in 146 G/m Theta Z | 10055 G/in .217 G/m Lo2.5. 01 the MD! erations: This type of analysis was suggested in Sec. 3.4 of Ref. 1. The first requirement for using MDMAC to calculate physical loads is that a mathematical finite model (NASTRAN) of the Payload (or the component) must be available so that modal analysis can be done. This modal analysis furnishes the effective mass of the modes and the data recovery matrices to generate the loads. The MDMAC analysis consists in using the MDMAC for the entire frequency range of the Payload, low and mid-frequency, to calculate the purely dynamic loads The modal responses Q, necessary for the calculation of actual loads are obtained from the curve (MDMAC) using the following formula as indicated in Sec, 3.2 of Ref. 1 and repeated here for convenience as Eq. (6), Qs = Qeaae ~ Lag * 44/08 ) where m,: effective mass of a mode (Appendix A of Ref.1) ms = (mye)? + (me)? + (me)? : rigid elastic coupling (r = 1,2,3) acceleration read from the MDMAC Wg: resonant frequency of the mode. The bound Qsmac ig used for all the modes of the Payload, low and mid- frequency. The interface accelerations UDDy and thrust for the calculation of the quasi-static loads are those of Tables 1 or 2 for an entire Spacecraft. 2.6. A Modified Algorithm for Estimating Loads: The method to obtain and combine modal bounds in order to calculate physical responses is a basic ingredient of the Generalized Shock Spectra analysis and is explained in Ref. 1. The responses are accelerations A and menber loads P, they are calculated by Eqs. (10) and (11) of Ref. 1 in which the statically indeterminate part has been taken out for this report. These equations are re- labelled (7) and (8) in this report. A = {(Y]oBr * uDDds|)? + L(sBs * w% Qg)? qa P = J(LJOEFI * upDs|)? + L(oEFS * Q,)? (8) where [481], [#BS], [OEFI] and [OEFS] are the appropriate data recovery matrices. The rigid body modes are absolute summed between themselves using UDDj, then the total rigid body modes are RSS‘d with all the elastic modes using Q, to finally produce A and P. A modification of the method, which results as an improvement, was prompted by the peculiarity of the Stage 1 Shutdown events of Titan used Ref. 2. Figure Al 14of Appendix A shows a typical interface acceleration in the axial direction at Titan Stage 1 shutdown indicating a strong oscillation near 21 Hz combined with a large steady state acceleration AT3 of about 3.9 G's at the end of the burn. The conservatism retained in Secs. 3.1.8 and 3.1.9 of Ref. 1 to calculate Q, was found excessive for these Burnout events. Therefore a less conservative approach was taken. The purely dynamic modal acceleration g(t) is now used to calculate Qs instead of the largest of qg(t) or dg(t)/u} for all modes of the Payload. Equation (8) of Ref. 1 is therefore modified as follows and becomes Eq. (9): QCE,T,s) = (Gs(t)/o8)max (9) Then, the super bound Q, of the modal response is obtained for each normal mode of the Payload by calculating the mean plus 3 sigma value among all the cases i.e. all events and all. tunings. If the max value “in the sét Q(E,T,s) is greater than mean plus 3 sigma then this max value is the modal bound: Qs ~ (mean + 3 signa or max of Q(E,T,s)) over E,T (19) s = 1,23. This new formulation for Q, is less conservative because it removes the steady state acceleration contribution of AT3 to each of the mode. The total steady state is now reintroduced as a separate term. Although the steady state acceleration in the lateral directions and in rotations are negligeable, the same formulation was also carried out, for generality, to the 3 translations and 3 rotations resulting in steady state terms ATy (i-1,2...6). The terms AT; are pulled out from UDDi and Eqs. (7) and (8) are modified as follows: -atiol A= D[gBr * at] + oiiest * (UDD4-AT;) |)? + TCGBS * w% Qs)? (11) where [#BI] rigid body modes (6) [gBS] elastic modes UDD; interface accelerations (bounds) in G's and G/in (or G/n) ATj thrust value in G's Physical Member Loads: P ~ DJogrr * ars] + J (DJOEFT * (upDy-aTz)|)? + S(OEFS * Qs)? (12) where [OEFI] inertia relief modes (6) [OEFS] modal forces. The terms ATi are zero except in the axial direction for which it is 1.5 or 3.9 G's as shown in Tables 1 and 2. In addition we note that since the new bounds Q, no longer contain any quasi- static component the RSS option instead of an absolute sum to combine the rigid body modes indicated in Ref. 1 is no longer appropriate. 1s2.7. Resultant Interface Forces and Moments Check: a) The basic equation for calculating the resultant interface forces and moments (Fi){n using inertia data only was presented in Ref. 1 (Sec. 3.1.10.). We will use this equation here for a different purpose. For clarity, this equation is repeated here as Eq. (13) with a slight change of notation: in > [Clare * w004))* + Lome * of 00) 3) Lol... 6 Equation (13) has the same structure as Eq. (7), the equation for calculating acceleration. Therefore Eq. (13) is re-written in its. improved.wersion as: (din = Timer * Ata] + [laze * GDdy-aTy) |)? + Temes * 08 05)? (4) is... 6 where (myy] is the rigid body mass matrix with respect to the interface (me] is the rigid elastic coupling matrix {UDD,) is the interface accelerations (bounds) in G’s and G/in (or G/m) {aTy) is the thrust value in G's (Qs) 1s obtained from the MDMAC. b) The interface resultant forces and moments can also be calculated using the stiffness property of the Spacecraft at the interface through the recovery matrices OEFI and OEFS. The appropriate data is obtained by generating a station cut at the interface to combine the local stiffnesses. The corresponding interface forces and moments (Fy)g¢ are obtained from Eq. (12) re-written here as Eq. (15) for the 6 interface degrees of freedom: (Fi)st ~ [|OEFI * ATy| + Sojjoert ‘* (UDDy-AT3)|)? + T(OEFS * Q,)? qs) where {OEFI] is the inertia relief matrix for the interface station cut [OEFS] is the modal force matrix for the interface station cut. Theoretically Eqs.(14) and (15) must produce identical values: Pin = Fdse (6) Since the two equations use different data, their usage provides an excellent check for consistency between the recovery matrices. It is a very good practice to always calculate the interface forces and moments from both the inertia data and the stiffness data and check their near identity. All the equations above have been programmed on a PC (IBM PS/2 mod 50) and all the calculations for the examples of this report done with this PC program. 163. MODAL MASS ACCELERATION CURVE (MDMAC) ANALYSIS 3.1, Subsystem Analysis: Figure 8 shows a sketch of the NASTRAN finite element model of the Galileo Thruster Boom attached on the Retro Propulsion Module (RPM). The baseline boom is a truss made of 41 CBAR elements to carry the Thruster Assembly at its tip. The truss weighs 8.2 1b uniformly distributed along the bars. The weight of the Thruster Assembly is lumped into two concentrated masses at the boom tip (14.5 Ibs at node 3555 and 0.9 Ibs at node 3554), The total baseline weight is 23.6 Ibs. Near the end of the Galileo design an option was investigated to add a 68.3 1b Ullage Tank to the-baseline boom: structure. This modification represents a significant increase of mass of almost 3 times the original design mass. The Ullage Tank was attached near the mid-section of the boom (RBE3 to nodes 3561, 3562, 3563, 3564). The new tank is lumped at node 3575 about 10 inches outboard from the mid-section. This option now has masses concentrated at three different locations in addition to the distributed mass of the truss. ‘This precludes using the physical Mass Acceleration Curve (Sec. 5). ‘The MDMAG analysis on a sub-model of the boom provided a fast turnaround to investigate the increase of loads resulting from the 68.3 lb addition. This approach avoided a lengthy re-cycling of the full spacecraft model loads analysis. A modal analysis of the Thruster boom sub-model restrained at the interface between the boom and the RPM (nodes 3173, 3176, 3472, 3474) was done and 10 modes obtained from 29.73 Hz to 267.8 Hz. The accelerations (9 dof’s) at the Thruster (nodes 3554 and 3555) and Ullage Tank (node 3575) and the loads in 26 primary bars of the main truss were sought. I£ the attachment of the subsystem cannot be modelled as statically determinate the model should include part of the core structure in the vicinity of the attachment. Consequently the restrained end of this expanded model is moved away from the subsystem root into the core. The first difficulty is typical of the problems faced by the Loads Engineer. The MDMAC has been originally obtained from data of a full Payload cantilevered at the Launch Vehicle/Payload interface while the boom subsystem is cantilevered on the Retro Propulsion Module core. Since loads are needed while strictly speaking no adequate data is available to calculate them, a compromise must be done by the analyst to provide loads to the project. The compromise is to still use the MDMAC of Fig. 1 but since the sub-model is attached on the RPM rather than being on the Launch Vehicle/Payload Interface the accelerations of the RPM were taken for the bounds UDD; instead of the ones of Table 2. All the forcing function data and the submodel data are shown in Appendix B. uwat MAIN BOOM Ullage Tank Figure 8. Payload Subsystem - Galileo Thruster Boom Ullage TankIn the course of determining the number of modes to be retained for the submodel analysis the rule is to check the total effective mass of the submodel. As it is commonly done for the system model the ratio of the total effective mass (and effective inertia) to the total physical mass (and inertia) of the structure should be at least 90% (preferably close to 1008) for the model to be dynamically representative Let us be reminded that MDMAC will produce dynamic loads in the structure only for the frequency range for which resonant frequencies are present. If too many modes are not in the model the loads will be too low. Table 3 displays the effective masses and inertia calculated for the 10 modes that have been retained showing a mass (inertia) ratio greater than .90. Table 3. Effective masses for Payload Subsystem MODE FREQ. DAMP. EFFECTIVE WEIGHT PER MODE PER DOF (iz) (LB AND LB-IN*#2) 1 29.73 .010 0 76.4 1.7 2,06E#04 9.078403 3.15E+05 2 44.51 010 102.8 44.7 7.50E#02 2.185405 1. 35E+04, 3 64.52 .010 10 4.3 24.4 1.228+03 6 .01E404 6.238403 4 73.80 ‘010 10 5.6 18.4 1.53B403 5.15E+04 6.03E+03 5 102.31 010 26.4 20 10 4.51E+02 6.58E+03 2.218-02 6 135.33 ‘010 56.9 :0 0 7.71E401 1.57E+04 7.87E-03 7 175.87 ‘010 20 :0 0 2.518400 9.58E+01 6.418+00 8 213.50 ‘010 La 20 © 3.548401 3.75E+02 1.85E-02 9 239.37 ‘010 a7 20 © 3.34E+01 3.708402 3.08z+00 10 267.77 ‘010 :0 20 © 6.55E+00 3.268402 5.12E+01 TOTAL 83.4 89.2 89.3 2.47EHOK 3.628405 3.418405 RATIO “L938 98 294 99 1.00 The accelerations and member loads using the data of Appendix B are shown in Tables 4 and 5 below. The distribution of theses loads between the thrust, the rigid body modes and the elastic modes is shown in Appendix B. 19Table 4. Accelerations for Payload Subsystem GLL Ullage Tank Analysis (Full) - 18 Damping S/C FEM Description DOF = aT Node No. Row No. Accelerations 3554 Thruster Tip 1 1 18.69 G 2 2 30.94 3 3 26.27 G 3555 Thruster Cluster 1 4 18.25 G 2 5 28.89 G 3 6 30.30 G 3575 Ullage Tank (Full) 1 7 11.15 G 2 8 14.71 3 9 14.60 @ 7S Table 5. Member Loads for Payload Subsystem GLL Ullage Tank Analysis (Full) - 1 Damping Row FEM Element Component Description Member Loads No. No. Type 1 3771 BAR AXIAL FORCE 1843.2 Ib 2 3772 BAR AXIAL FORCE 1114.9 1b 3.3773 BAR AXIAL FORCE 1225.4 1b 4 3774 BAR — AKTAL FORCE 359.3 Lb 5 3775 BAR AXIAL FORCE 1830.7 Ib 6 3776 BAR AXIAL FORCE 1121.2 1b 7 3777 BAR AXIAL FORCE 1202.4 1b 8 3778 BAR AXIAL FORCE 355.4 Ib 93779 BAR AXIAL FORCE 355.2 1b 10 3780 BAR AXIAL FORCE 288.6 1b 11 3781 BAR AXIAL FORCE 354.1 1b 12 3782 BAR AXIAL FORCE 276.2 Ib 13 3783 BAR AXIAL FORCE 645.8 1b 14 3784 BAR AXIAL FORCE 72.5 Ib 15 3785 BAR AXIAL FORCE 207.8 Ib 16 3786 BAR AXIAL FORCE 742.3 Ib 17 3787 BAR AXIAL FORCE 424.9 1b 18 3788 BAR AXIAL FORCE 189.4 1b 19 3789 BAR AXIAL FORCE 334.8 1b 20 3790 BAR AXIAL FORCE 649.6 1b 21 3791 BAR AXIAL FORCE 80.7. 1b 22 3792 BAR AXIAL FORCE 231.9 Wb 23 3793 BAR AXIAL FORCE 740.5 Wb 24 3794 BAR AXIAL FORCE 425.8 1b 25 3795 BAR —AKTAL FORCE 189.0 1b 26 3796 BAR © AKIAL FORCE 333.3 Ib 203.2. mat avload Resultant Interfac sans es for 3.2.1. Interface Forces and Bending Moments: Let us take, as an example, a 3000 kg (6613.9 Ibs) Payload (Fig. 9) to be launched on the Titan 4/IUS. A fairly representative ball park estimate of the interface resultant forces and bending moments can be made from Eq. (14) with only a little additional rough knowledge of the Payload. The following values can be guessed for example from radius of gyration estimate, from the available space in the shroud envelop in which the payload will be located or from other more accurate available source: €.G, location from the interface Zog~ 2.5.0 Lateral moments of inertia Ix = Iy = 25500 kg-m? Rotation moment of inertia Iz = 4320 kg-m?. We next know from experience that the payload will most likely have at least 3 fundamental modes: © two lateral "first bending" modes, one in each lateral direction X and Y © one axial mode in Z. Note that it is not necessary to know the resonant frequencies of these modes since Eq. (14) shows that only the modal acceleration QDD, ~ ug Qs is needed. The modal acceleration can be obtained directly from Eq. (6). aod, = of Qs = [ag * As ay However the effective mass mz of these modes must be known. To this end we can use our experience which shows that the effective mass of a fundamental mode is typically between 40 and 60 % of the total mass. Since we consider only 3 modes we will take the high value of 60 # i.e. mode 1 - effective mass for first bending mode in X = 1800 kg located 3 a above the I/F mode 2 - effective mass for first bending mode in Y¥ ~ 1800 kg located 3 m above the I/F mode 3 - effective mass for axial mode (bounce) in Z = 1800 kg located on the Z axis Table 6 shows the input data necessary for the calculations. The output data is shown in Table 7. 21JPL 1800 kg og. Bastic 3.0m 1200 kg <== os 2 m lox loy = 5625 kam’ log = 4820 kg-m? Fisd_.} Spacecraft/Launch Vehicle Interface : Figure 9. Model for Preliminary Interface Loads 22Table 6. Input Data for Interface Forces and Bending Moments FF.DAT STICK SPACECRAFT - TITAN/IUS FORCING FUNCTION MDMAC - 09/18/89 1.45 ; I/F ACC FOR MDMAC Titan 4/TUS 1200.00 L/V EFF MASS IN KG -010 L/V DAMPING 1.00 } OVERALL UNCERTAINTY FACTOR 3 ; NO. OF ELASTIC MODES 6 { NO. OF I/F DEGREES OF FREEDOM (RIGID BODY MODES) ° : NO. OF ACCELERATIONS OF ATM 0 NO. OF LOADS OF LTH THRUST IN G'S FROM TITAN LAUNCH VEHICLE ENVELOP L/O.AND BURNOUT... 6 ; NO. OF THRUST COMPONENTS - THERE IS ONLY ONE 0.00000£+00 0,00000E+00 3,90000E+00 ;6’S 0..00000+00 0..00000+00 0.00000+00 D'S I/F ACCELERATIONS IN G'S ENVELOP TITAN L/O AND BURNOUT ; NUMBER OF UDD‘S (ROWS) - NEXT 2 ROWS FOR COMMENTS METRIC UNITS ul oGSaurene 7.40000E-01 ;6'S 1.480008+00 4.53000E+00 9.45000E-01 ;¢/m 3, 94000E-01 9, 84000E-01 aurene MRR. DAT (mpy] - STICK SPACECRAFT - SEP 89 METRIC UNITS - KG-M-SEC SYSTEM 6°; NO. OF I/F DOFS 6 ; NO. OF 1/F DOFS 3.000000E+03 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00-7.500000E+03 0.000000E+00 0,.000000£+00 3.000000E+03 0.000000E+00 7.500000E+03 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 3.000000E+03 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 7.500000E+03 0.000000E+00 2.550000E+04 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 -7.500000E+03 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 2.550000E+04 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 4.320000E+03 MER. DAT [mye] _- STICK SPACECRAFT - SEP 89 METRIC UNITS - KG-M-SEC SYSTEM 3°; NO. OF ELASTIC MODES 6 ; NO. OF I/F DOFS 4, 242641401 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00-1.272790E+02 0.000000E+00 0,.000000E+00 4. 242641E+01 0.000000E+00 1.272790E+02 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0..000000E+00 0.000000E+00 4.242641E+01 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 23Table 7. Preliminary Interface Forces (Total and modal loads) and Moments I/F DOFS 1 2 3 4 5 6 @) a a (N-m) (Q-m) (N-a) ‘TOTAL LOAD 7.948404 1.28E+05 1.79E+05 3.91E+05 2.38E+05 4. 17E+04* MODE FREQ DAMP (Hz) T 1 .00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.008+00 T 2 .00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 T 3.00 0.00E+00 0,00E+00 1.15E+05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0,00E+00 T 4 .00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 T 5 .00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 T 6 .00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 R 1.00 .000 2.18E+04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 5.448404 0.00E+00 R 2 00 .000 0.00E#00 4.35E+04 0.00E+00 1.09E+05 0.00E+00 0.008+00 R 3.00 .000 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.85E+04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 R 4 00 .000 0.00E+00 6.95E#04 0.00E+00 2.36E+05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 R 5 00 000 2.90E+04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 9.848404 0.00E+00 R 6 .00 .000 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 4.17E+04 EL + .010 6 ,10E+04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.83E+05 0.00E+00 EB 2 = 010 0.00E+00 6.10E+04 0.00E+00 1.83E+05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Ez 3 = 010 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 6.10E+04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 This Moment (Torsion) is only for Quasi-static load (no purely dynamic load) 243.2.2. Torsional Moment: In the example above no torsional mode was considered, consequently the interface torsion reported above is only due to the quasi-static input Theta z with no purely dynamic response. Introducing torsion is not readily feasible. First, no attempt has been made so far to extend the concept of the MDMAC to moment inertia in addition to mass. Therefore the MDMAC cannot induce a response for a “pure” torsion mode for which effective mass as define above (translational mass) will not exist. However, practical Payloads usually do not have pure torsion modes, there is always enough dissymetry in the structure to create a small value of effective mass for a mode that is really only a "near" torsion mode. The MDMAC as derived in Ref. 2 includes all the modes, in particular the practical torsion modes that have small effective masses. Therefore if a small effective mass could be guessed for the torsion, a load could be generated for the torsional moment. However this would require a lot of judgement and we will not do that here. We will say that a pure torsion cannot be obtained. 3.3. Preliminary Loads for a Complete P: The analysis carried out in sec. 3.1. for preliminary loads of a subsystem is more appropriately done for the entire Spacecraft since all the data used for generating the MDMAC and interface accelerations were for a full Payload. Once a MDMAC has been established for a launch vehicle and a preliminary model of a payload, the MDMAC analysis can be done on a updated model of the Spacecraft using this launch vehicle. It is also believed that the MDMAC is general enough so it varies very little from one payload to another. Therefore a MDMAC generated for one payload can be used for another and still have a reasonable estimate of loads. As an example of how the MDMAC is used, the Titan 4/IUS forcing function (MDMAC, interface accelerations and thrust - Fig. 2 and Table 2 data) was applied to the Galileo Spacecraft (August 88 model- 80 modes) for a medium size Loads Transformation Matrix (LTM size 489) and a reduced Acceleration Transformation Matrix (ATM size 45). There is no limit for the size of the LIM and ATM that can be used. The entire set of some 20,000 loads usually obtained in the GSS analysis can obviously be used with a large enough computer. The input data is not reported here because of its large size. However it has the same format as the input data of Appendix B for the subsystem, there is just much more of it. Here again we will bring a note of caution from Sec. 3.1, one must be assured that enough modes of the Spacecraft have been retained. Table Cl of Appendix C shows the effective mass for each of the 80 modes and the total effective mass summed on all the modes which is more than 90.% of the rigid mass indicating that enough modes have been retained. This is a check that should always be done. 253.3.1, Accelerations and Member Loads: Table 8 shows the member loads are accelerations. Table 8. GLL Member Loads - TITAN 4/TUS MDMAC Forcing Function FEM No. 5010 5011, 5012 5013 5014 7100 7101 7102 7103 Thos 7600 7601. 7602 7603 9100 9900 18 Damping Element Description Type Force BAR AXIAL . Se, Boom BAR AXIAL Sc. Boom BAR AXIAL Sc. Boom BAR AXIAL Sc. Boom BAR AXIAL Sc. Boom BAR AXIAL +X RIG BAR AXIAL +X RIG BAR AXIAL +X RTG BAR AXIAL +X RTG BAR AXIAL +X RTG BAR AXIAL -X RTG BAR AXIAL -X RTG BAR AXIAL -X RTG BAR AXIAL -X RTG STACUT FX FWD TRW FY FU TRW FZ FUD TRW MX FWD TRW MY FWD TRW MZ FWD TRW STACUT FK GLL-IUS FY GLL-IUs FZ GLL-IUS MX GLL-IUS MY GLL-IUs MZ GLL-IUs Boom Boom Boom Boom Boom Boom Boom Boom Boom SHELL SHELL SHELL SHELL SHELL SHELL /F I/F I/F I/F 1/F 1/F 26 member loads for a reduced size LIM (26). The total 489 shown in Table C2 of Appendix C. Table 9 shows the Member Loads 4827.7 4375.6 4977.3 4133.9 1565.6 6112.2 6915.4 5904.4 6769.3 263.1 5990.1 6663.8 6044.8 7045.1 16304.7 26714.8 35412.6 1106712.0 818377.3 279720.9 17909.2 26779.4 38344.1 2823221.0 1876550.0 419866.8 ib lb LbTable 9. GLL Accelerations - TITAN 4/IUS MDMAC Forcing Function 18 Damping S/C FEM Description DOF ATH Node No. Row No. Accelerations 379 SKA C.G. 1 1 19.15 2 2 20.34 G 3 3 7.71 ¢ 841 SKA Tip 1 4 47.81 6 2 5 52.49 ¢ 3 6 8.08 G 3160 RPM Oxy Tank No. 2 L 7 4.64 2 a 6.15 ¢ 3 9 9.24 ¢ 3260 RPM Fuel Tank No. 2 1 10 4.95 G 2 1 6.29 G 3 12 9.29 ¢ 3360 RPM Oxy Tank No. 1 1 13 4.64 2 14 6.25 ¢ 3 1s 9.32 6 3460 RPM Fuel Tank No. 11. 16 4.93 ¢ 2 17 6.23 ¢ 3 18 9.26 ¢ 3555 RPM +X Thruster 1 19 3.59 ¢ 2 20 30.54 ¢ 3 21 37.76 3655 RPM -X Thruster 1 22 3.62 G 2 23 23.80 G 3 24, 39.19 ¢ 4418 RH Antenna c.g. 1 25, 20.11 ¢ 2 26 33.95 ¢ 3 27 23.57 G 5000 Sc. Boom Mag Canister 1 28 12.38 G 2 29 9.86 @ 3 30 19.71 ¢ 5610 Nutation Damper 1 31 46.59 ¢ 2 32 60.07 ¢ 3 33 9.54 6 6100 Scan Platform C.¢. 1 34 9.66 G 2 35, 7.32 ¢ 3 36 13.32 ¢ 7050 4X RTG cc. 1 37 8.80 2 38 13.19 ¢ 3 39 18.26 ¢ 7550 -X RIG c.G, 1 40 10.41 ¢ 2 41 14.50 ¢ 3 42 18.16 Gc 8130 Probe ¢.G 1 43 6.33 ¢ 2 4 6.79 ¢ 3 45 8.15 63.3.2. Interface Forces and Moment Check: ‘This analysis done on an entire Spacecraft is used to illustrate a numerical example for the check mentioned in Sec. 2.7. The “inertia” interface forces and moments (Fy)in calculated by Eq. (14) are shown in Table 10. Table 10, Inertia (Craig-Bampton) Interface Forces and Moments I/F DOFS 1 2 3 4 5 6 iB) (1B) (1B) (LB-IN) — (LB-IN) —(LB-IN) TOTAL LOAD 1.80E+04 2.68E+04 3.86E+04 2.83E+06 1.885106 4.215+05 The stiffness interface forces and moments (Fi)s¢ of Eq. (15) have already been calculated in Table 8, they are the last 6 rows of the menber loads for station cut 9900. Table 10 and station cut 9900 of Table 8 show that the numbers are almost all identical, providing a usefull check of the analysis. 284, ABBREVIATED LOADS ANALYSIS FOR CONSERVATIVE DESIGN There are different methods of various sophistication and values that can be used for estimating loads in a Spacecraft structure as was shown in Ref. 1 and elsewhere. Each method has its place depending upon the fiscal and schedule environments of a particular project and to a great extent upon the background of the personnel involved, as a result, it is expected that any one project will follow a different path for loads. ‘The Mass Acceleration Curve used at the modal level (MDMAG) as shown above is an additional simple approach that complements those of Ref. 1. Originally the MAC applied to a physical mass has been limited to the very preliminary design of subsystems. Its extension from the physical mass to the modal mass (effective mass) has greatly increase the usefulness of the curve. The MDMAC has been used-in Ref. 2 for the entire range of frequencies of the Spacecraft itself to check that the curve derived from analytical data of a Titan 4/TS/Galileo was indeed producing loads enveloping Transient and Generalized Shock Spectra (GSS) loads for the same payload. Although not formally reported, the MDMAC has also been used recently for the preliminary design of the Mars Observer Spacecraft for a Titan 3/TOS Launch Vehicle. The comparison done in Ref. 2 has shown various degrees of conservatism, sometimes very large but not always, in the use of the MDMAC for system loads of the entire Spacecraft. This sometimes large conservatism will undoubtedly result in larger structural mass than from the use of the GSS analysis but this should be traded against a very low cost of analysis and rapid turnaround so beneficial for tight schedule. The diagram of Fig. 10 shows a suggested loads analysis approach that is expected to save cost at the expense of a larger structural mass. In this approach all intermediate loads analyses are done using a MDMAC, There are only two cycles of couple Transient and Generalized Shock Spectra analyses done; one at the beginning of the project to establish/verify a MDMAC and one at the end of the project for pre-flight verification. As launch vehicles and especially upper stages become better defined and corresponding coupled analyses done on a family of different payloads, a common MDMAC is expected to emerge, possibly one per launch vehicle. Then the number of cycles of coupled transient analyses could be reduced to only one, the pre-flight verification cycle done at the end of the project, the initial cycle being eliminated. The diagram also shows an alternate iteration analysis for the payload, the GSS analysis, that can be inserted in the process at any time in the design to reduce conservatism if needed. This MDMAC approach for the entire Spacecraft is most applicable when mass is not a concern for the project. Questions may arise in its use for a mass critical Spacecraft, however since there is no available data which accurately correlate high loads with a corresponding increase of structural mass it is not possible to predict what increase of mass may result from using a MDMAC approach. We will simply say that our understanding of the loads v.s. sizing Process seems to show that the mass increase can be expected to be small. 29JPL Launch Vehicle Model and Forcing Functions y Project Payload Standard + stat Stick |e] Coupled Transient Model Analysis y Alternate less conservative Generalized Shock iteration —— Spectra Analysis 1 MDMAC Generation Design i | vesdation t Preflight >) _veritication jug—/ | | Transient Analysis 1 I —-) Magins ee Y Fa Figure 10. Abbreviated Loads Analysis 305, PHYSICAL MASS ACCELERATION CURVE (MAC) K Figures 11 and 12 show the Mass Acceleration Curves for physical masses of Spacecraft subsystems for STS/IUS and Titan 4/IUS respectively. As shown in Ref. 2 theses curve are higher than the corresponding MDMAC. The usage of theses curves for subsystems is very straight forward but it can be done only under strong limitations: a) there must be only one lumped mass for the subsystem b) the mass must be less than 500 kg c) the subsystem structure must be "appendage like" in configuration with a statically determinate attachment on the Spacecraft core or on another larger subsystem. These curves are intended to be used for preliminary design of subsystems waen NO finite element model exists: a) to determine preliminary acceleration of the lumped mass of an item within a Spacecraft b) to determine preliminary loads on the sub-structure supporting the lumped (single) mass of the item. For any other condition, a finite element model of the support structure is needed and the MDMAC approach must be used to obtain loads. This model can be very rudimentary, but the important thing is that enough natural modes should be present in that model (effective mass greater than 90%). Example: Consider an Instrument (Fig.13) weighing 100 kg supported by a yet unknown structure attached on the main spacecraft at P. The spacecraft is to be launched on Titan 4/IUS. From the curve of Fig. 12 the bounds of the components Ax, Ay, Az of acceleration of the Instrument C.G. are: X direction Ay = 1 ¥ direction Ay = 1 2 direction az = 1 5.0 g's no quasi-static 5.0 g's no quasi-static 8.9 g's (15 + 3.9 = 18.9) The corresponding bounds of inertia loads on the 100 kg Instrument are: X direction Fy = 100 * 9,807 * 15.0 = 14706 N ¥ direction Fy ~ 100 * 9.807 * 15.0 = 14706 N Z direction Fz = 100 * 9.807 * 18.9 = 18535 N 31SMI/S4S 03 eaany uopaeroy 9009 ssey TeOTSAYa “TT oandyy (94) SSUN TWIISAHE @le scm ec 2 Ole och e 2 @lo ose ¢ 2 Wis scene 2 1qy +} {+ T - + z am —| | ;—+—+t i{] | € r Tre rT ' + 4— a j—}__t 4 +} — s r 3 8 ANT ae + 191 t a z —— + a Th € +— 4 + = i+ 4 St} 1 +—4 ale + z Ht | —}_ tt 4 9 —t +} — + 8 ml 201 lL CEGGZ=MS‘*86°€=09) IUDISAHd 9) Nor1wu373090 32SMI/4 WeIT] I0J eAIND UOTIPIETeD9y SseH TeOTSkyg “ZT eANBTa 9X NI - SSUH TWIISAHd Ole gc he ele g9c¢ mh € 2 le gst _e z le och c 2 OT, T a 1 — z t+ € ' | 4+ s 8 HA | | : rH 101 | z € if ® s hh 3 q |] @ a | va (68/G2/8) ‘80°S-09°N39*11dIUW WOUS YLUO IS JIYINID ' ‘ SINIOd SSUW 40 13994 33Main Spacecraft Figure 13. Single Mass Appendage for Physical MAC 34The location of the Instrument is known i.e, the coordinates x, y, z of the Instrument with respect to the attachment plane are given, for example: x .3 meter y = 1.2 meters z= .5 meter. The next step is to run three separate static load cases for the three separate inertia loads Fy, Fy and Fz above to calculate the loads in the support structure between P and the Instrument. The maximum load for any of theses three cases is the preliminary design load of the support structure. For example with the data shown above, the maximum reaction forces ‘and moments at P are: Ry = 14706 14706 18535 22242 7353 17647 waza =, # wena Bae For a structure not directly aligned with the basic system of coordinates XYZ, it may be necessary to investigate 3 orthogonal directions that are not in the basic system to obtain the maximum load. Generally, it is not necessary to combine the three cases since the MAC has been generated by retaining the maximum acceleration in any 3 directions. Combining the three cases is not wrong, it would simply add more conservatism to the loads. 356. REFERENCES 1. Trubert, M., "Loads Analysis Methodology for Spacecraft as Applied to Galileo,” JPL Publication D-3858, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, December 1, 1988. 2. Teubert, M., Walton, B.,"Preliminary Design Loads for Payloads Launched by Titan 4/1US, "JPL Publication D-6818, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, November 1, 1989. 3. Trubert M., Salama M., "A Generalized Modal Shock Spectra Method for Spacecraft Loads Analysis", JPL Publication 79-2, Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology,.Pasadena,~Galifornia, Mareh“15, "1979 ~ 36APPENDIX A TITAN 4 TYPICAL THRUST DECAY STAGE 1 BURNOUT TITAN/TUS/GLL EQUIV AIGID INTERFACE Feu3 TIME HISTORY GUL_Z TI AXIAL ~ Heri coor " GAC +t utili 2.588 0.600 8.78 TIME (SEC) Figure Al. Axial Acceleration at Titan 4 Stage 1 Shutdown 7APPENDIX B DATA FOR PAYLOAD SUBSYSTEM - GALILEO THRUSTER BOOM ULLAGE TANK B.1. INPUT DATA MDMAG, DAT GLL ULLAGE TANKS 09/28/89 Mass Acceleration Curve only - new program 1.60 ; I/F ACC FOR MAC GLL/STS in g's 13227.74 L/V EFF MASS IN LBS 010 L/V DAMPING 1.00 } OVERALL UNCERTAINTY FACTOR 10 NO. OF-ELASTIG MODES ~ 6 NO. OF I/F DEGREES OF FREEDOM (RIGID BODY MODES) 9 NO. OF ACCELERATIONS OF ATM 26 ; NO. OF LOADS OF LT LIFTOFF STS\IUS\GLL THRUST VALUE IN G'S FROM LAUNCH VEHICLE 6 ; NO. OF THRUST COMPONENTS - THERE IS ONLY ONE 0.00000E+00 0. 00000E+00 1.50000E+00 0. 00000E+00 0. 00000E+00 0. 000008+00 FIOFF rpm accelerations and mode flag 19930 station 32.992 from ap 88 loads ; NUMBER OF UDD’S (ROWS) - in g's - NEXT 2 ROWS FOR COMMENTS rene ui 1 3,34000E+00 max of 3125,3130,3415,3420 2 2.68000E+00 " 3 3.950008+00 D 4% 0.63100E-01 rotation from mode flag 19930 top of rpm 5 0,55100E-01 ” 6 0.42500E-01 EREQ.DAT FREQUENCIES in Hz FOR GLL ULLAGE TANK ANALYSIS FULL 09/28/89 10 :NO. OF MODES 2.973152E+01 4.451301E+01 6.452267E+01 7.379884E+01 1.023096E+02 1.353333E+02 1.758655E+02 2.135047E+02 2.393698E+02 2.677740E+02 38DaMP.DAT DAMPING - GLL ULLAGE TANK FULL u u Beowvausene 0; NO. OF MODES +010 010 2010 +010 010 +010 2010 2010 -010 -010 MER.DAT =~ MER GLL ULLAGE TANK FULL 09/28/89 10 ;TOTAL NO. OF ELASTIC MODES - ROWS 00 prbbenswnee 6 ;NO, OF INTERFACE DOF’S - COLUMNS +99GLO0E-04 4,449500E-O1-6.607500E-02 7.306700E+00 4. 846200E+00 2.857400E+01 :282000E-03-8,518500E-02-3 . 402400E-01-1.393400E+00 2.377200E+01-5.915900E+00 :743700E-04-1.061400E-01 2.515700E-O1-1.777100E+00-1.247700E+01-4.015700E+00 + 930300E-04-1,202600E-01-2.185200E-01-1.990900E+00 1.155400E+01-3.951100E+00 +516000E-01 5,542800E-04-3.773300E-05-1.080900E+00-4.128400E+00 7.565700E-03 +837500E-01-1.203800E-04 1.108900E-03 4.468100E-01-6.377400E+00 4.516100E-03 +044600E-03 7.973600E-03 9,537300E-03 8,070400E-02-4.980900E-01 1.288600E-01 +95400E-02-1.312100E-05-1.469200E-04 3.027100E-01 9.851100E-01-6.919000E-03 +401700E-02 2.530100E-03 3.099900E-03 2.942000E-01-9.795400E-01 8.938000E-02 036000E-03 5.817500E-03 1.007800E-02 1.302700E-01-9.194900E-01 3.640300E-01 MRR. DAT MRR ULLAGE TANK FULL 09/28/89 2 -7 “4 1 3 1 6 ;NO. OF I/F DOFS 6 ;NO. OF I/F DOFS -369400E-01-7 .687200E-16-4,170500E-16-1.203600E-14-3,884900E+00 1.219700E-02 -691400E-16 2.369400E-01 3.424500E-16 3,884900E+00-1.852000E-14 1.425500E+01 -169600E-16 3.424500E-16 2.369400E-O1-1.219700E-02-1.425500E+01 2.538800E-14 -202300E-14 3.884900E+00-1.219700E-02 6,780700E+01 4.233900E-01 2.340300E+02 884900E+00-1. 849800E-14-1.425500E+01 4,233900E-01 9,518100E+02 1.906000E-02 -219700E-02 1.425500E+01 2.537900E-14 2.340300E+02 1.906000E-02 8.870800E+02 PHIBL.DAT PH: 1. 4, “4 1 “6. 4, 1 -2. IBI GLL ULLAGE TANKS 09/28/89 9; NO. OF DOFS (DOWN) 6 ; NO. OF RIGID BODY MODES (ACROSS) 0000008+00-1. 846741E-15-2.494431E-16-2.550439E-14-1.291340E+01-1.442611E-13 943450E-15 1.000000E+00 1.033897E-15 1.291340E+01-2.750742E-1é 7.633740E+01 -458088E-15 3.260192E-15 1,000000E+00 4.299443E-14-7.633740E+01 2.565708E-13 -000000E+00-7.247686E-16-5.516900E-16-1.004078E-14-1.649610E+01-5.090047E-14 285673E-15 1.000000E+00 9.628222E-16 1.649610E+01-8.729907E-15 8.070870E+01 490090E-15 4.629125E-15 1.000000E+00 6.186178E-14-8.070870E+01 3.704814E-13 -000000E+00-3,499720B- 16-1. 405142E-16-2.157873E-15-1.649610E+01-2.337019E-14 105990E-15 1.000000E+00 4.452817E-16 1.649610E+01-1.274900E-14 5.700000E+01 39-8,766366E-16 2.517359E-16 1.000000E+00 1.165734R-15-5.700000E+01 1.899074E-14 PHIBS, DAT PHIBS GLL ULLAGE TANKS 09/28/89 9 ;NO. OF DOFS (DOWN) 10 ;NO. OF ELASTIC MODES (ACROSS) 1,251844E-01 4,506064E-01 4.278235E-01-3.775331E-01 1.423098E+00 2.493850E+00 -1,569506E+00 3.527726E+00 3.923972E-01-2. 467810E+00 2.937771E+00-8.163221E-01 1.320214E+00 1.804874E+00 2.990213E+00-2.186317E+00 -3,858039E+00 1.258133E-01 6.167074E-01 1. 872297E+00 8 806571E-01-3, 824648E+00-1.095476E+00 1.831584E-01 4.237190E-02 7.111585E-03 =1,814080E+00 3, 734662E-02-1.437139E-01-3. 292305E+00 -6.739771E-04 1.947704E-03-2.422378E-03 8.815130E-03 1.403050E+00 2.499397E+00 -1,304926E-01 3.512181E+00 4,931560E-01 2. 3.271665E+00-1046074E+00 -1,769818E-01-2.700675E-02-3.475343E-02 9. 172391£-01 817876E-03 916303E+00 "2 °847814E+00-1.632393E-O1 1.097775E-01 -1,034219E+00-4.372062E+00-1.620424E+00 6.545470E-01 1.791104E-02 1.387946E-02 -5.832013E-02 1.838029E-02-2.077672E-02-1. 624099E-02 +1,089501E-03 5.722541E-04-5,015171E-03 9.117121E-03 9.977099E-01 1.450854E+00 4.274807E-02-1,150597E+00 1.391255E-01 6 537101E-03 1,633049E+00-2,273717E-O1-9.794644E-01-1.272395E+00-7.764268E-03 4.587206E-03 3.141440E-01 2.916627E-02-2.565792E-03-9. 813159E-02 -1,295950E-01-8.156219E-01 1.676008E+00-1.270671E+00-1.596421E-02 1.730301£-03 1. 736043E-01-1.115027E-03 7.362919E-02 3. QEFL.DAT OEFI GLL ULLAGE TANKS FULL 09/28/89 26 ;NO. OF DOFS - AXIAL FORCE ONLY (DOWN) 6 ;NO, OF RIGID BODY MODES (ACROSS) 382033E-01 0 OPTION for oefi generated with udd in g’s or in/sec-KOEFI.EQ.0 in/sec*2; 4,887777E-02-2.528224E-O1 1.052440E-01-4, 6.933189E-03 1.981419E-01 1.205930E-04 3 6.651649E-02 9,142744E-02 1.443172E-01 1. 7.911831E-04 7.874782E-04-5,229043E-02 9. 4,996499E-02 2,539733E-01-1.048279E-01 4. 6.919927E-03-1.996781E-01-1.797656E-04-3. 6. 734040E-02-9.232894E-02-1.434045E-01-1. 1.492707E-04 3.263356E-04 5,186163E-02 7. 4 ,680168E-03-5,530513E-02-1.183628E-02-9. 1.807735E-02 2.273684E-02 3.091496E-02 3. -4.819539E-03 5.537627E-02 1.184820E-02 9. 1,813251B-02-2.297039E-02-2.926251E-02-4, 6. 647284E-03-3.754134E-02 3.717003E-02-6. 7. 729428E-04-4,867855E-03 3.196944E-04-1. 3.551465E-03 1.076949E-02 3.271775E-04 2. 1.879975E-02 4.139549E-02 4.718190E-02 6. 8.687587E-03 2.711873E-02 1.683321E-02 4. 2.293391E-03-4.568500E-04-1.451189E-02 5. 4.727923E-03 1.475802E-03 2.439129E-02-7, 7.357996E-03 3.816083E-02-3.715774E-02 6. 7 6B494GE-04 5,396855E-03-3.006925E-04 5, 3,585636E-03-1.237451B-02-3.854837E-04-1 188728E+00-7. 331335E+00-1, 415617E+00-1. 237961E-02 2. 138508E+00 6. 207775E+00-1. 596625E+00 7, 875993E-02-2. 144531E-01 1. 063605E-01-2. 080111E-01-8. 389573E-01 1. 080655E-01-3. 122174E-01-1., 574892E-01-9.. 501853E-01-4.. 493333E-01-1. 432865E-02 1. 718537E-02-1. 287929E-01 2. 438240E-02 3. 160560E-01-2. 40 935092E+00-1.603903E+01 224403E-01 1.208290E+01 023658E+01 6.188559E+00 694701E+00 4.258299E-02 287208E+00 1.611473E+01 025294E-01-1.217313E+01 984628E+00-6 . 245205E+00 693097E+00 2.503557E-02 024346E+00-3.371615E+00 013535E+00 1.469465E+00 694728E-01 3.376794E+00 320212E+00-1.478239E+00 122038E+00-3 .037377E+00 078273E-02-3.386489E-O1 023640E-02 7.998575E-O1 094240E+00 3.310824E+00 558548E+00 2.258123E+00 150115E+00-3.104898E-02 984470E+00 1.120572E-01 894720E+00 3.082497E+00 508731E-02 3.79709SE-01 374086E-02-9. 247613E-011, 934294E-02-4,173685E-02-4.722744E-02-7.073485E-01 3.472086E+00-3.335367E+00 9. 739916E-03-2.770434E-02-1.675801E-02-4.504255E-O1 1.254012E+00-2.298052E+00 =2,046037E-03-4.558909E-04 1.454259E-02 5.435901E-02-1.080386E+00-3.834906E-02 41281092E-03 2.014747E-04-2.443488E-02-9.807958E-02 1.838598E+00 1.540293E-02 QEFS.DAT OEFS GLL ULLAGE TANKS FULL 09/28/89 26 ;NO. OF DOFS - AXIAL FORCE ONLY (DOWN) 10 ;NO. OF ELASTIC MODES (ACROSS) (0 ;OPTION KOEFS-0 OEFS RAW DATA WAS not DIVIDED BY OMEGA**2 -2,.032087E+04-1.088708E+04 1.11931 1E+04-1.433866E+03 2.878696E+04 5.235679E+04 5 .49G682E+03-4.670132E+04 5.073714E+04 1.437782E+04 1326008E+04-5.717125E+03-1.497966E+04-2.224587E+04-8.587258E+03 1.688706E+04 6.176299E+03 3, 859216E+04-6.181103E+04 2.4461216+04 5 .656605E+03=2.458327E404 2. 27B529E+04-1,267017E+04 4.536697E+04 6.943559E+04 =5,974893E+02-4,209253E+04-2.646799E+03 3. 704439E+04 =5,585791E+01 7.982838E+02-1.966888E+04 1.872661E+04-1.704158E+04 1.435275E+04 =6,610776E+03 1.678864E+03 9.414544E+04 6. 697818E+03 2.041103E+04 1,084936E+04-1.104346E+04 1.485169E+03 2.913419E+04 5.273472E+04 -3,620745E+03-4.770195E+04 3.895246E+04-1.834507E+04 +1,336602E+04 5, 761626E+03 1.490900E+04 2:21280SE+04-8.974584E+03 1.701956E+04 -9,909255E+03 3, 860108E+04-7.149841E+04-4,213346E+03 =5.720086E+03 2,457485E+04-2.243838E+04 1.271302E+04 &.63707SE+04 6.9391 77E+04 4 ,081333E+03 -4,181300E+04-1.182337E+04-3.430140E+04 1.248823E+02-8.051364E+02 1.935023E+04-1.868576E+04-1.733089E+04 1.394572E+04 1.756092E+03 1.669956E+03 9.082691E+04-1.076578E+06 =3.282060E+03 5.559743E+03 7, 299404E+03 4. 948659E+03-2.722535E+03-6. 688425E+03 -B,564825E+03-2.601940E+04 4.916998E+03 1.212648E+04 1,608254E+03-2.774746E+03 8.538156E+03-9.300850E+03 2.373299E+04 7.809471E+03 - 7, 331026E+01-2,111142E+04-5.8204918+04-3. 519042E+04 3, 287240E+03-5, 574915E403-7.310312E+03-4. 946990E+03-2.990103E+03-6.449756E+03 1.023281E+04-2,230271£+04 2.526610E+03-1.618781E+04 -1.624843E+03 2.558958E+03-8.090243E+03 9.240780E+03 2.331991E+04 7.494734E+03 4 ,624282E+03-2.160528E+04-4,548652E+04 3.810546E+04 +5, 661607E+03-9.730733E+03-2.212397E+04-1.778493E+04 7.797844E+03 9.679250E+03 7,472950E+03 9. 764084E+04 5.109704E+02 3.776803E+04 -4.239738E+02 1.559855E+02-3.515134E+02-6.127239E+02 9.826322E+03-1,343396E+04 3.021155E+04-6.625344E+02 8.751061E+03-3. 740620E+04 1,019703E+03-7.408920E+02 1.503000E+03 2.915740E+03-2.740636E+04 4.176465E+04 -8.291155E+04-2.055431E+06-3.749447E+03 9.953353E+04 2.977443E+03-1.917681E+04 3.412906E+02 3.024785E+04 1.354167E+04 2.903085E+04 +3,848633E104 5.459556E+04 3.610282E+04-2.924691E+03 2. 604135E+03-8.821608E+03 4.509878E403 2.387418E+04 7.046296E+02 2.211621E+04 8.930871E+04 5.349993E+04-2.467284E+04 4.527790E+04 4.033318E+02 4. 398625E+03 2.498522E+03-1.135256E+03-2.037395E+04 1.875711E+06 1.704924E+04-1,085585E+04-2.008015E+04 8.211806E+04 +6.479897E+02-7.837505E+03-4,837952E+03 2.854782E+03 3.539385E+04-3.335880E+04 +2.692831E+04 1.291348E+06 6.108531E+04-1.291838E+05, 5.726070E+03 9.749248E+03 2.23203GE+04 1.787123E+04 6.769960E+03 1.102001E+04 -1,420560E+04 9.904013E+04 1.833573E+03-2. 644141E+04 4, 820356E+02-2.026226E+02 5.359375E+02 9.404894E+02 1.076666E+04-1.499965E+04 +2,829625E+04-6.222277E+03 9.033583E+03 3.517057E+04 4.“1. "861444E+04-5. 250108E+03-5.427621E+03-1.019855E+05 Bae "362065E+04 5.968571E+04 4. 340400E+04 1.076966E+03 22. 9. 5. 1. 196124E+03 8.850190E+02-2.056994E+03-3,906700E+03-3.0L6049E+04 4. 636017E+04 002894E+03 1,923642E+04-2.956185E+02-3,025021E+04 1.345123E+04 2.932366E+04 §52272E+03 8, 868881E+03-4.519504E+03-2.409560E+04 4.G82681E+03 1.882147E+04 313360E+04 4.811647E+04-2.716265E+04-3.834716E+04 019235E+02-4.331809E+03-2.806098E+03 5.334340E+02-1.988602E+04 1.944140E+04 919819E+04-7 .664586E+03-2.609571E+04-7 .983878E+04 288196E+02 7,715692E+03 5.392102E+03-1.768841E+03 3.456420E+04-3.461329E+04 "020743E+04 7.285437E+03 7.029946E+04 1.216577E+05 42B.2. DISTRIBUTION OF LOADS - THRUST (T), RIGID BODY (R) AND ELASTIC MODES (E) ATM LOADS (TOTAL AND MODAL) in G OR G/IN ATM ROWS: 1 2 30 4 5 6 7 8 9 TOTAL LOAD 18.69 30.94 26.27 18.25 28.89 30.30 11.15 14.71 14.60 MODE FREQ DAMP (na) TL 00 00.00.00 0000.00.00 00.00 T 2 00 00.00.00 00.00 * 0000.00.00 T 3.00 700.00 1.50 00 .00 1.50 .00 .00 1.50 T 4 .00 100.00 .00 -.00 00.00 00.00.00 TS .00 100.00 .00 .00 00.00.00 .00.00 T 6 00 100 100.00 .00 00.00.00 .00 — .00 R 1 .00 3.36 00.00 3.34 00.00 3.34 00.00 R 2.00 100 2.68 .00 .00 2.68 .00 .00 2.68 .00 R 3.00 00.00 2.45 00.00 2.45 00.00 2.45 R 4 .00 700.81 ©.00 001.04 =.00 00 1.04.00 R 5.00 :TL 00 «G21 9100 4.4591 003.14 R 6 .00 100 3.26 00 00 3.43 100.00 2.42 .00 E 1 29.73 .010 81 18.90 5.67.00 21.05 6.65 .00 10.51.83 E 2 4&.51 010 2.64 4.78 22.40 01 6.13 25.60 .00 1.33 4.78 E 3 64.52 .010 2.23 6.89 5.72 .01 10.01 8.46 .03 5.11 8.75 E 4 73.80 .010 1.88 9.00 .91 .04 14.19 3.26 .05 6.34 6.33 E 5 102.31 .010 7.13 14.97.21 7.02 .82 .09 5.00 .04 .08 E 6 135.33 .010 15.14 13.27 .0415.18 .67 .08 8.81 .03 01 E 7175.87 010 58 1.41 .66 .05 .06 .02 .02 .12 .06 E 8213.50 .010 5.94 .21 .06 5.91 .05 .03 1.9% .05 00 E 9239.37 010.50 78 =.18 63.04 = 603-1800 .09 E10 267.77 010.8968 1.19.08 =.00 00.00.04 = 112 43CRAIG-BAMPTON INTERFACE FORCES AND MOMENTS (TOTAL AND MODAL LOADS) I/F DOFS 1 2 3 4 5 6 (aa) iB) (1B) (1B-IN) (LB-IN) —(LB-IN) TOTAL LOAD 1,09E+03 1.30E+03 1.29B+03 2.15E+04 8.54E+04 8. 10E+04 MODE FREQ DAMP (iz) T 1.00 0,00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 T 2 00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 T 3.00 2.41E-13 1.98E-13 1.37E+02 7.06E+00 8.26E+03 °1.47E-11 T 4 — .00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 T 5.00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 T 6 .00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 R 1.00 3.06E+02 9.91£-13 5,38E-13 1.55E-11 5.01£+03 1.57E+01 R 2.00 7.96E-13 2.45E+02 3,54E-13 4.02E+03 1.92E-11 1.47E+04 R 3 00 3.94E-13 3.24E-13 2.24E+02 1.15E+01 1.35E+04 2.40E-11 R 4 .00 2.93E-13 9.46E+0L 2.97E-01 1.65E+03 1.03E+01 5.70E+03 R 5.00 8.26E+01 3.94E-13 3.03E+02 9.01E+00 2.02E+04 4.0SE-01 R 6 .00 2.00E-OL 2.34E+02 4.16E-13 3.84E+03 3.13E-O1 1.46E+04 E 1 29.73 010 9.92E-01 1.116403 1.64E+02 1.82E+04 1.20E+04 7.10E+04 E 2 44.51 010 2.90400 1.93E+02 7.69E+02 3.15E+03 5.37E+04 1.34E+04 E 3 64.52 010 5.53E-O1 2.14E+02 5.07E+02 3.58E+03 2.52E+04 8.10E+03 E 4 73.80 010 1.53E+00 2.316402 4.20E+02 3.83E+03 2.22E+04 7. 60E+03 E 5 102.31 .010 4.86E+02 1.07E+00 7.29E-02 2.09E+03 7.98E+03 1.46E+01 E 6 135.33 .010 9.00E+02 2.82E-01 2.60E+00 1.05E+03 1.50E+04 1.06E+01 E 7175.87 .010 1.48E-01 1.13E+00 1.35E+00 1.14E+01 7.05E+01 1.82E+01 E 8 213.50 .010 3.87E+01 8.53E-03 9.55E-02 1.97E+02 6.40E+02 4. 50E+00 E 9 239.37 010 2.16E+01 1.24E+00 1.52E+00 1.44E+02 4.81E+02 4.39E+01 E10 267.77 .010 5.64E-O1 8.13E-O1 1.41£+00 1.82E+01 1.28E+02 5,09E+01 4aLIM LOADS (TOTAL AND MODAL) LIM ROWS 1 2 3 4 5 6 TOTAL LOAD 1.84E+03 1.11E+03 1.23E+03 3.59E+02 1.838403 1.128403 MODE FREQ DAMP (Hz) T 1.00 0,00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 T 2 .00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 T 3.00 6.10E+01. 6.98E-02 8.36E+01 3.03E+01 6.07E+01 1.04E-01 T4 00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 TOS 00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0,00E+00 0.00E+00 T 6 .00 0.00£+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 R 1.00 6.30E+01 8.94E+00 8.58E+01 1.02E+00 6.442401 8.92E+00 R 2 .00 2.62E+02 2.0SE+02 9.46E+01 8.15E-O1 2.63E+02 2.07E+02 R 3.00 9.96E+01 1.14E-01 1.37E+02 4.95E+01 9.92E+01 1.70E-01 R 4 .00 1.028402 8.12E+01 3.45E+01 2.25E+00 1.01E+02 7.81£+01 R 5.00 1.69E+02 2.60E+00 2.18E+02 5.73E+01 1.34E+02 2.18E+00 R 6 .00 2.63E#02 1.98E+02 1.02E+02 6.99E-01 2.64E+02 2.00E+02 E 1 29.73 .010 1.45E+03 9.44E+02 4.03E+02 3.98E+00 1.45E+03 9.52E+02 E 2 4&.51 .010 3.15E+02 1.65E+02 7.11E+02 2.31E+01 3.14E+02 1.67E+02 E 3 64.52 .010 1.37E+02 1.842402 2.79E+02 2.41E+02 1.35E+02 1.83E+02 E 4 73.80 .010 1.288401 1.99E+02 1.13E+02 1.68E+02 1.33E+01 1.98E+02 E $102.31 .010 1.35E+02 4.O2E+01 2.12E+02 7.97E+01 1.36E+02 4.20E+01 E 6 135.33 .010 1. 70E+02 5.48E+01 2.25E+02 4.65E+01 1.71E+02 5.52E+01 E 7175.87 .010 6.37E-Ol 7.16E-O1 6.92E-02 7.66E-Ol 4.20E-01 1.15E+00 E 8 213,50 .010 1.69E+01 1.398401 1.52E+01 6.06E-01 1.72E+01 1.39E+01 E 9 239.37 .010 1.10E+01 1.34E+01 5.74E-01 2.04E+01 8.45E+00 1.55E+01 E10 267.77 .010 7.10E-O1 1.218400 1.83E+00 3.31£-O1 9.05E-01 2.08E-01 45LIM LOADS (TOTAL AND MODAL) LIM Rows 7 8 9 10 un 12 TOTAL LOAD 1.208+03 3.55E+02 3.55E+02 2.89E+02 3.54E+02 2.76E+02 MODE FREQ DAMP az) T 1.00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 .0.00E+00 0.00E+00 T 2 © .00 0.008+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00° 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 TR 00 8.318401 3.008401. .6.85E+00 1. 79E+01-. 6. 865400... 1,69E+01 T 4 .00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00' 0.00E+00 0:00E+00' 0.00E+00° 0.00E+00 T 5.00 0,00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 T 6 .00 0.008+00 0.00£+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 R 1.00 8.68E+01 1.92E-01 6,04E+00 2.33E+01 6.21E+00 2.34E+01 R 2 .00 9.55E+01 3.38E-01 5.72E+01 2.35E+01 5.73E+01 2.38E+01 R 3.00 1.36E+02 4.91E+01 1,12B+01 2.92E+01 1.12E+01 2.77E+01 R 4 .00 3.89E+01 1.928400 2.23E+01 7.46E+00 2.21E+01 1.07E+01 R 5° .00 1.70E+02 5.73E+01 2.18E+01 4.28E+01 1.85E+0l 2.81+01 R 6 .00 1.02E+02 4.11E-01 5.53E+01 2.41E+01 5.54E+01 2.43E+01 E 1 29.73 010 4.O7E+02 8.896400 2.34E+02 1.14E+02 2.34402 1.16E+02 E 2 G&.51 010 7.10E+02 2.336401 1.61E+02 8.02E+01 1.61E+02 7.40E+01 E 3 64.52 010 2.75E+02 2.37E+02 8.95E+01 1.05E+02 8.97E+01 9.92E+01 E 4 73.80 010 1.14E+02 1.676402 4.43E+01 8.32E+01 4.43E+01 8.27E+01 E 5 102.31 010 2,17E+02 8.11E+01 1.27E+01 1.11E+02 1.40E+01 1.09E+02 E 6 135.33 010 2.25E+02 4.52E+01 2.17E+01 2.53E+01 2.09E+01 2.43E+01 E 7 175.87 010 4.73E-01 2.03E-01 9.92E-01 8.49E-03 1.19E+00 5_36E-01 E 8 213.50 .010 1.51E+01 6.03E-01 9.40E+00 7.62E+00 8.06E+00 7.80E+00 E 9 239.37 010 2.57E+00 1.97E+01 1.07E+00 1.26E+01 5.48E-01 9.87E+00 E10 267.77 010 1.69£+00 5.31E-01 5.98E-01 1.74E+00 7.99E-01 1.88=+00 46LIM LOADS (TOTAL AND MODAL) LIM ROWS 13 14 15 16 wv 18 TOTAL LOAD 6.46E+02 7.25E+01 2,08E+02 7.42E+02 4.25E+02 1.89E+02 MODE FREQ DAMP iz) T 1.00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 T 2 © .00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 T 3.00 2,15E+Ol 1.85E-01 1.89E-01 2.73E+01 9.75E+00 8.40E+00 T 4 300 0.00E+00 0.00£+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 TS .00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 T 6 .00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 R 1.00 8.57E+00 9.97E-01 4.58E+00 2.42E+01 1.12E+01 2.96E+00 R 2 .00 3.88E+01 5.04E+00 1.11E+01 4.28E+01 2.81E+01 4.73E-01 R 3.00 3.52E+01 3.02E-01 3.09E-01 4.46E+01 1.59E+01 1.37E+01 R 4 .00 1.48E+01 2.73E+00 6.27E+00 1.58E+01 1.09E+01 1.32+00 R 5.00 6.648401 2.29E-Ol 1.92E+00 8.71E+01 3.32E+01 2.45E+01 R 6 .00 4.98E+01 5.56E+00 1.31E+01 5.43E+01 3.71E+01 5.09E-01 E 1 29.73 ,010 “4,03E+02 3.02E+01 7.26E+01 2.12E+02 1.85E+02 2.87E+01 E 2 &.51 .010 2.81E+02 4.S1E+00 2.14E+01 5.54E+02 2.55E+02 1.27E+02 E 3 64.52 .010 2.71E+02 4.31E+00 1.84E+01 4.19E+00 5.53E+01 3.06E+01 E 4 73,80 ,010 1.598402 5.48E+00 2.61E+01 2.71E+02 2.14E+02 1.02E+01 E 5 102.31 .010 3,65E+01 4.60E+01 1.28E+02 6.33E+01 3.30E+00 9.53E+01 E 6 135.33 .010 3.14E+01 4.36E+01 1.35E+02 9.41E+01 7.17E+01 6.08E+01 E 7175.87 .010 8.66E-01 3.50E+00 9.61E+00 4.46E+00 1.03E+01 1.98E+00 E 8 213.50 .010 3.53E+01 2.39E-01 7.42E+00 1.97E+01 1.93E+01 3.92E+00 E 9 239.37 .010 1.11E-01 1.90E+00 8.14E-01 7.83E+00 5.35E+00 4, 36E+00 E10 267.77 .010 1.868400 1.85E+00 4.91E+00 1.44E-01 2.23E+00 4.05E+00 a7LIM LOADS (TOTAL AND MODAL) LIM ROWS 1g 20 an 22 23 24 TOTAL LOAD 3,35E+02 6.50E+02 8.07E+0L 2.328402 7.40E+02 4.26E+02 MODE FREQ DAMP iz) T 1 .00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 T 2 .00 0.00E+00 0,00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00. 0.00E+00 T 3.00 L.G1E+0L 2.15E+0L 1.74E-01 2.23E-01 2.748+01-.9.718+00 T 4 100 0.00E+00 .0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 T 5 .00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 T 6.00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 R 1.00 6.10E+00 9.498400 9.91£-01 4.62E+00 2.498401 1.26E+01 R 2 .00 1,53E+00 3.95E+01 5.58E+00 1.28E+01 4.32E+01 2.87E+01 R 3.00 2.318401 3.51E+01 2.84E-01 3.65E-01 4.47E+01 1.59E+01 R 4 100 1.88E+00 1.53E+0L 1.32E+00 2.83E+00 1.72E+01 1.10E+01 R 5.00 4.22401 6.16E+01 7.46£-01 5.05E-Ol 7.39E+01 2.67E+01 R 6 .00 1.848400 5.06E+01 6.23E+00 1.52E+01 5.47E+01 3.77E+01 E 1 29,73°.010 4,61E+01 4.08E+02 3.43E+01 8.52E+01 2.14E+02 1.89E+02 E 2 44.51 .010 2.278402 2.82E+02 5.86E+00 2.56E+01 5.56E+02 2.56E+02 E 3 64.52 .010 5.93E+01 2.74E+02 6.57E+00 2.52E+01 3.63E+00 $5. 54E+01 E 4 73.80 010 2.55E+01 1.60E+02 8.42E+00 3.50E+01 2.71E+02 2.16E+02 E 5 102.31 010 1.66£+02 3.17E+01 5.04E+01 1.41B+02 6.29E+01 2.19E+01 E 6 135.33 010 1.08E+02 3.57E+01 4.86E+01 1.50E+02 9.51E+01 6.10E+01 E 7175.87 .010 3.12E+00 1.65E+00 3.28E+00 9.11E+00 3.90E+00 1.08E+01 E 8 213.50 .010 4.66E+00 3.58E+01 2.25E+00 1.90E+00 2.16E+01 1. 74E+01 E 9 239.37 010 1,33E+01 3.98E-O1 1.96£+00 1.18E+00 9.42E+00 5.89=+00 E10 267.77 .010 6.38400 1.30E+00 1.74E+00 5.03E+00 5.31E-02 1.892+00 48LIM LOADS (TOTAL AND MODAL) LIM Rows 25 26 TOTAL LOAD 1.898402 3.33E+02 MODE FREQ DAMP iz) T 1.00 0,00E+00 0.00E+00 T 2 00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 ' T 3.00 8.42E+00 1.42E+01 T 4 00 ~~ 0,00E+00 0.008400 ~~ T 5.00 0.008+00 0.00E+00 T 6 00 0.008+00 0.00E+00 R 1.00 2.648400 5.52E+00 R 2.00 4.72E-01 2.08E-01 R 3.00 1,38E+01 2.31E+01 R 4 .00 1.32E+00 2.398+00 R 5.00 2.30E+01 3.91E+01 R 6 .00 6.29E-01 2.53E-01 E 1 29.73 .010 3.57E+01 $.908+01 E 2 44.51 .010 1.258402 2.23E+02 E 3 64.52 .010 3.448401 6.61E+01 E 4 73.80 .010 4.77E+00 1.58E+01 E 5 102.31 010 9,30E+01 1.62E+02 E 6 135.33 .010 6.30E+01 1.12E+02 E 7 175.87 .010 2.22E+00 3.50E+00 E 8 213.50 .010 2.77E+00 2.63E+00 E 9 239.37 .010 5.66E+00 1.53E+01 E 10 267.77 .010 3.94E+00 6,00E+00 TOTAL WEIGHT = 91.5 LB EFFECTIVE CG ACCELERATIONS ECG X ACCELERATION ECG ¥ ACCELERATION ECG Z ACCELERATION tot BEB c c G EcGZ1 = 78.00 IN FROM I/F ECGZ2 = 16.58 IN FROM I/F ECGZ = 47.29 IN FROM I/F 49MODE FREQ. «Hy 1 12.65 2 13.06 3 16.31 4 16.68 5 17.30 6 17.63 7.18.40 8 18.87 9 20.00 10 20.26 lL 21.64 12 21.90 13 24.14 1425.50 1525.81 16 26.99 1727.29 18 28.67 19 29.49 20 30.60 21 31.83 22 32.53 23° 32.79 24 33.15 25 34.02 26 35.62 27° 35.98 28 36.65 2936.87 30 37.30 3137.54 32 38.74 33° 41.40 34 43.18 35 43.49 3643.77 37 44.26 38 45.17 3945.59 40 46.78 41 48.24 42 49.40 43 50.04 44 50.19 APPENDIX C. OUTPUT DATA FOR GALILEO TITAN 4/IUS Table Cl. Effective Mass (weight) of the Galileo Model DAMP. -010 o10 +010 +010 010 -010 +010. -010 -010 010 o10 010 010 +010 -010 +010 O10 2010 +010 010 010 -010 010 010 010 +010 -010 +010 +010 +010 +010 +010 +010 +010 +010 +010 +010 2010 -010 010 010 -010 1010 o10 EFFECTIVE WEIGHT PER MODE PER DOF (LB AND LB-IN**2) 1 2315.4 1966.3 3 6.8 1719.9 900.6 107.0 142.2 1, 0 224 190:0 ks 89.6 S61. 186.72 7.01. 10 47 67.30 8 53.0 12.5 3. 0 1B. 6 10 487.6 13. 86.7 69. 10 TH, 1.300 4, 49 1 11.1 103 7) 6.4 36.300 4 1 30. 2 7 aS 6. BS 5. 17.4 16.1 50.3 38 61.7 1. 1.0 o 2 -0 5, 15.1 29, 18.512, :0 88. 9.4 7) :5 3. 8 66. Poets SRSer ey OPH AS oP eLwoweURNODUNHEN DOO 297.4 4.07E+07 9.45403 1.528407 6 .48E+05 3.04E+02 9. 16E+05 2.36E+03 1. 08E+06 7.93E+01 3.38E+03 1.278+06 7. 48E+04. 5.27E+03 4. 35E+04 1.068404. 4. 90E+01 1.79E+04 3.85E+03 3.39E+04 6. 44E+03 1.128406 2.94B+03 1.24E+05 1.63E+02 1. 15E+04. 3.57E+03 3. 008+04. 1.738403 1.318404 3. 00E+04. 1.218404 1.918+03 3.008404 8.21E+01 4.10E+03 2.60E+05 1.67E+05 4. 71E+04 1. 12E+06 3..24E+04 5.22E+02 2.14B402 6. 70B+03 6. 28E+04 50 5.02E+02 3. 78E+07 5. 28E+04 6. 36E+06 3.44E+06 5.03E+03 1. 86E+06 5.41405 8. 86E+05 7.02E+06 1.90E+02 2.738405 1.988405 1.84404 3.95E+01 1.238404 1.75E+02 7. 60E+05 1. 21E+05 8.41E+02 4 .B4E+03 1.60E+03 1.298+04 6. 95E+01 1. 64E+04 1.635405 7. 68E+01 1.86403 4.06E+01 5.75E+03 3.75404 5. 84E+06 1.10E+05 1.79E+05 6. 44E+02 3. 14E+02 3.53E+03 5.62E+03 1.098401 1.66E-01 1. 06E+04 8.94E+00 3.118402 2.99403 RPO PRON OOP EO UUHO FER UR HUPN NUNES COENEUNR NOE NUE - 19E+02 33E+03 ~40E+04 -O7E+06 +: 89E+05 -S4E+04 LSTE*O4 * + 24E+03 +50E+05 = 94403 +12E+03 -75E-O1 +02E+05 = 25405 4 7E+04 - L1E+06 625406, 277404 + 85E+05 25E+05 SBE+O4 209E+02 63E+05 -03E+03 :89E+04 = 298405, -72E+04 -49E+02 1 O4E+04 - 34403 -59E+02 -T1B+04. -45E403 :20E+03 LLE+O4 .7BE+02 66E+02 :82E+03 +15E+03 +: 0BE+02 7: 26E+03 -46E+02 -98E+02 -93E+0245 50.65 .010 4s 2.7 2.5 1.41E+04 1,08E+02 4.208403 46 50.96 010 3 3.9 6.1 7.13E#03 5.49E+03 1.07E+03 47 51.08 —.010 5.4 1.8 6.8 -4,21E403 2.97E+03 2. 78E+02 48 52.11 .010 9.1 11.6 10 1.41E+04 5.66E+04 9, 31E+03 49 52.27 .010 2.0 1.3 3.1 2,15E+04 1.678+04 4.57E+03 50 53.32 .010 20 10 25.0 7.07E+01 3.78B-02 2.28E+04 51 55.29 .010 4.5 0 18.6 1.51E-02 4.18E+03 8.30E+03 52 56.48 .010 28.7 32.6 1.3 2.72E+04 4.09E+04 2.29E+04 53 58.84 .010 ‘1 16.9 +9 1,86E+04 5.50E+03 2.62E+01 54 60.06 .010 15.2 9 26.6 3.26E+02 4.54E+03 5. 58E+03 55 60.30 .010 4.2 1.3 +6 3.21E+03 2.25E+03 1.16E+03 56 61.19 .010 zal 2 41.9 1,93E#02 4.64E+02 3.17E+04 57 62.21 .010 <0 :0 +0 9.19E+00 5.33E+01 1.13E+01 58 62.23 .010 :0 -0 1.1 1,49E+01 2.608401 2.01402 59 63.72 010. 5.9 :0 2.9 G.55E+03 2.32E+06" 2.85E+02 60 66.22 .010 Lit 7 10 6,02E+03 8.98E+01 1.29E+04 61 68.61 .010 7.9 15.7 23° 3.21E+04 4.47E+03 1.73E+03 62 70.73 .010 7.5 3.4 +2 1.69E+04 2.88E+04 6.09E+01 63 73.05 010 42.1 23.2 +2 1.61E+04 4.88E+04 6.98E+04 64 73.85 .010 2.9 9 0 3,95E-O1 2.37E+03 3.97E+04 65 76.35 010 11.5 5.1 1.0 8.33EH03 3.62E+04 5.62404 66 677.35 .010 3 2.1 26.8 3.90E+03 3.09E+02 1. 96E+03 67 79.26 010 20 3) 0 4.59E-02 1.31E+03 1.72E+02 68 80.80 .010 1.9 3 1.3 2.98E+00 3.40E+04 7.75404 69 81.50 .010 2.3 “6 20 7.44E+03 2.898403 5.88E+02 70 81.86 010 25 1.2 0 6,08E+03 8.12E+03 4.528403 Tl 82.66 010 Ba) 20 +2 5,60E+02 3.598401 5.726402 72 82.86 010 3.6 4 +0 6,00E+03 4.76E+03 2.16E+03 73 83.31 010 3 2.8 3 8.86E+03 7.25E+02 5.03E+02 74 84.53 .010 1.2 16.0 7 5. 74E+06G 3,13E403 1.418404 75 86.85 .010 3.5 2.4 1.3 8.278403 3.21E+03 5.16E+02 76 87.20 .010 17.0 10.3 2.0 3.67E+04 2.95E+04 1.618+03 77 88.95 .010 9.8 3.0 2.5 1.95E#03 2.14404 3.72E+04 78 89.27 .010 2.4 15.7 2.1 2.62E+04 3.31E+03 5.19E+00 79 90.31 .010 on 22 2 1.68E+02 9,44E+02 1.32E+02 80 91.02 .010 BS 4 10 9.498402 1.09E+04 3. 76E+03 TOTAL EFF. MASS 5818.3 5796.3 5698.7 6.12E+07 6.03E+07 6.92E+06 RATIO TO RIGID MASS .97 97 95 99 99) 90 SLTable C2. Galileo Member Loads Aug 88 model - Titan 4/IUS MDMAC Forcing Function Verification Loads LIM (10/02/89) Row FEM Element Component Description Member Loads No. No. Type Force 1 1248 BAR AX FORCE —SKA Support Can Diag 4510.0 1b 2 1249 BAR AX FORCE —SKA ‘Support Can Diag 1756.8 1b 3 1250 BAR AX FORCE —SXA Support Can Diag 1860.4 1b 4 1251 BAR AX FORCE —SKA Support Can Diag 4572.6 Ib 5 1252 BAR AX FORCE —SKA Support Can Diag 2915.4 Ib 6 1253 BAR AX FORCE —SXA Support Can Diag 2810.7 1b 7 1276 BAR AX FORCE _— SKA Support 1970.1 1b 8 1277 BAR | AX FORCE "SKA Support 1206.0 bv 9 1278 “BAR” AX”FORCE -. SKA Support 1264.6 1b 10 1279 BAR AX FORCE SKA Support 1931.5 1b 11 1280 BAR © AK FORCE SKA Support 978.3 1b 12 1281 BAR © AK FORCE SKA Support 1489.2 Ib 13 1282 BAR AX FORCE —SKA Support 1463.7 1b 14 1283 BAR AX FORCE —SXA Support 981.9 1b 15 3108 BAR AX FORCE = «RPM X-String, Lwr Ft 8138.6 1b 16 3116 BAR AX FORCE ~—«RPM X-String, Lwr Ft 7824.3 1b 17 3119 BAR AX FORCE ~— RPM X-String, Lwr Ft 446.2 Ib 18 3208 BAR AX FORCE = RPM X-String, Lwr Ft 7723.7 Yb 19 3216 BAR AX FORCE = RPM X-String, Lwr Ft 8064.4 1b 20 3219 BAR © AX FORCE = RPM X-String, Lwr Ft 488.7 Ib 21 3308 BAR © AX FORCE RPM X-String, Lwr Ft 8433.0 1b 22 3316 BAR AX FORCE ~— RPM X-String, Lwr Ft 7189.4 1b 23 3408 BAR AX FORCE RPM X-String, Lwr Ft 7273.1 Wb 24 3416 BAR AX FORCE RPM X-String, Lwr Fe 8429.6 Ib 25 3511 BAR © AX FORCE RPM Tank Sup Str, Ox2 705.4 1b 26 3512 BAR AX FORCE ~—-RPM Tank Sup Str, Ox2 760.6 1b 27 3513 BAR AX FORCE RPM Tank Sup Str, Ox2 1438.6 Lb 28 3514 BAR AX FORCE RPM Tank Sup Str, Ox2 1314.5 1b 29 3521 BAR AX FORCE RPM Tank Sup Str, Fuel 530.5 1b 30 3522 BAR AX FORCE RPM Tank Sup Str, Fuel 489.9 1b 31 3523 BAR AK FORCE RPM Tank Sup Str, Fuel 1080.7 1b 32 3524 BAR AX FORCE RPM Tank Sup Str, Fuel 897.3 lb 33° 3531 BAR AX FORCE RPM Tank Sup Str, Ox1 741.4 1b 34 3532 BAR AK FORCE = RPM Tank Sup Str, Oxl 733.3 1b 35 3541 BAR AK FORCE «RPM Tank Sup Str, Fuel 487.5 1b 36 3542 BAR AK FORCE —-RPM Tank Sup Str, Fuel 596.3 lb 37 3619 BAR AK FORCE — RPM +X PCA/PIA Diag St 347.5 1b 38 3669 BAR AK FORCE RPM -X PCA/PIA Diag St 371.3 1b 39 3723 BAR AX FORCE ~—-RPM +X He Tank Supt St 203.3. Ib 40 3724 BAR AX FORCE RPM +X He Tank Supt St 252.4 Ib 41 3727 BAR AK FORCE RPM +X He Tank Supt St 194.5 1b 42 3728 BAR AK FORCE RPM +X He Tank Supt St 275.3 Ib 43 3783 BAR AK FORCE RPM +X Thruster Bm Str 736.9 1b 44 3790 BAR AK FORCE RPM +X Thruster Bm Str 756.9 Ib 52Table C2. Galileo Member Loads Aug 88 model - Titan 4/TUS MDMAC Forcing Function FEM Element No. 3801 3843 3846 3873 3880 4000 4002 4004 4005 4097 4100 4102 4104 4105 4106 4401 4401 4402 4402 4403 4403 4611 4612 4615 5010 5011 5012 5013 5014 5015 5410 S411. 5412 5413 5500 5501. 5502 5503, 5506 5507 5508 5601, 5601 5601 Verification Loads LIM (10/02/89) Type BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR Force FORCE FORCE FORCE FORCE FORCE FORCE FORCE FORCE FORCE FORCE FORCE FORCE FORCE FORCE RRR RR RRR RRR REE Component RPM RPM RPM RPM RPM Description Wagon Wheel Struts Wagon Wheel Struts Wagon Wheel Struts x x Despun, Despun, Despun Despun Despun Despun Despun Despun Despun Despun RRH Science Science Science Science Science Science Science Science Science Science Science Science Science Science Science Science Science ‘Thrus ter Boom St Thruster Boom St Box, Box, Box; Box, Box, Box, Box, Box, Box, Box, ‘Antenna Antenna Antenna Antenna Antenna Antenna Support Support Support Boom Boom Boom Boom Boom Boom Boom Boom Boom Boom Boom Boom Boom Boom Boom Boom Boom Launch outba Outba Outbd Outbd Launch Outbd outba outa Outba Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Nutation Damper Nutation Damper Nutation Damper 53 (cont. ) Member Loads 299.7 270.7 296.0 684.6 720.8 4115.1 2642.3 912.8 2092.4 816.5 4070.6 3022.1 1008.1 1423.9 916.4 546.6 1473.0 2654.5 6253.0 2405.3 796.3 613.5 1211.4 1036.8 4827.7 4375.6 4977.3 4133.9 1565.6 1059.0 1486.4 720.9 1606.4 442.6 1607.7 660.0 660.9 1496.5 987.6 2191.9 2486.8 307.1. 223.9 100.9 1b 1b 1b Lb 1b 1b Lb 1b 1b 1b lb 1b Lb Vb 1b in-1b in-lb in-1b in-1b in-1b in-1b 1b 1b 1b 1b 1b Vb lb 1b 1b 1b 1b Ib Ib 1b sy 1b Lb 1b ib ib Lb lb lbTable C2. Row No. 89 90 o1 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 iL 112 113 114 11s 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 No. 5704 5704 5706 5704 5705 5705 5705 5705 5706 5706 5706 5706 5707 5707 5707 5707 6007 6008 6009 6010 6011 6012 6013 6014 6014 6014, 6014 6014 6201, 6202 6203 6204 6205 7100 7101 7102 7103 Thos 7132 7133 7134 7150 7151, 7152 Galileo Member Loads Aug 88 model - Titan 4/IUS MDMAC Forcing Function Verification Loads LIM (10/02/89) Element Type BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR BAR EEEEEEE ante Ante ante ante Ante Ante ‘Ante. ‘ante Ante Ante Ante Ante ante ante ante ante Component Description Force MOMENT-Al Science Boom, PWS MOMENT-A2 Science Boom, PWS MOMENT-B1 Science Boom, PWS AX FORCE Science Boom, PWS MOMENT-Al Science Boom,. PWS MOMENT-A2 Science Boom, PWS MOMENT-B1 Science Boom, PWS AX FORCE Science Boom, PWS MOMENT-Al Science Boom, PWS MOMENT-B1 Science Boom, PWS MOMENT-B2 Science Boom, PWS AK FORCE Science Boom, PWS MOMENT-Al Science Boom, PWS MOMENT-B1 Science Boom, PWS MOMENT-B2 Science Boom, PWS AX FORCE Science Boom, PWS AX FORCE Scan Platform AX FORCE Scan Platform AX FORCE Scan Platform AX FORCE Scan Platform AX FORCE Scan Platform AX FORCE Scan Platform AX FORCE Scan Platform MOMENT-BL Scan Platform MOMENT-B2 Scan Platform SHEAR-1 Sean Platform SHEAR-2 Scan Platform AX FORCE Scan Platform AX FORCE Sean Platform AX FORCE Scan Platform AX FORCE Scan Platform AX FORCE Scan Platform AX FORCE Scan Platform AX FORCE + RIG Boom AX FORCE +X RTG Boom AX FORCE +X RIG Boom AX FORCE 4K RIG Boom AK FORCE +X _RTG Boom AK FORCE —+K_RTG Boom AK FORCE —+K RTG Boom AX FORCE +X RTG Boom AX FORCE +X RTG Boom AX FORCE +X RTG Boom AX FORCE +X RTG Boom 54 (cont. ) Member Loads bpeUbrebuuUiues 1391.5 1120.2 1094.7 1582.0 2096.5 3969.1 6703.7 493.7 526.8 822.0 2100.0 3180.4 1281.8 1952.2 2419.0 6112.2 6915.4 5906.4 6769.3 263.1 909.9 1162.8 1275.9 1603.2 1579.9 982.1 in-1b in-1b in-1b 1b in-1b in-1b in-1b lb in-1b in-1b in-1b 1b in-1b in-1b in-1b ib ib lb lb lb ib lb 1b in-1b in-1b lb Ib lb lb 1b 1b lb 1b ib ib 1b lb 1b 1b 1b 1b 1b 1b bTable C2. Galileo Member Loads Aug 88 model - Titan 4/IUS MPMAC Forcing Function Verification Loads LTM (10/02/89) (cont.) Row FEM Element Component Description Member Loads No. No. Type Force 133 7153 BAR AX FORCE —-+K_-RTG Boom 1101.4 1b 134 7154 BAR AX FORCE —-+K_RTG Boom 859.9 1b 135 7155 BAR AX FORCE —«-+K_RTG Boom 1363.0 Ib 136 7156 BAR AK FORCE —-+K_RTG Boom 894.8 1b 137 7158 BAR AX FORCE +X TG Boom 864.1 lb 138 7160 BAR AX FORCE —.+K RIG Boom 1500.3 1b 139 7162. BAR’ AX FORCE —-+K_RTG Boot 1021.2 -1b- 140° 71637 BAR” “AR FORCE. +X RTG Boom 1492.3 1b 141 7165 BAR AX FORCE —-+K-RTG Boom 1021.5 1b 142 7600 BAR AK FORCE —--K_RTG Boom 5990.1 1b 143 7601 BAR AK FORCE = --X_RTG Boom 6663.8 Ib 144 7602 BAR AK FORCE —--K_RTG Boom 6044.8 1b 145 7603 BAR AK FORCE ~—-X RTG Boom 7045.1 1b 146 7604 BAR AX FORCE —-X_RTG Boom 363.7 1b 147 7632 BAR AX FORCE —-X_RTG Boom 1041.3 Lb 148 7633 BAR © AK FORCE —-X_RTG Boom “1588.5 1b 149 7634 BAR AK FORCE —--X_RTG Boom 1737.9 1b 150 7650 BAR AX FORCE —-X TG Boom 1100.1 1b 151 7651 BAR AX FORCE = -X TG Boom 1094.2 1b 152 7652 BAR © AX FORCE —-X TG Boom 959.6 1b 153 7653 BAR © AX FORCE —-X_RTG Boom 1274.0 1b 154 7654 BAR AK FORCE —--X_RTG Boom 1234.2 1b 155 7655 BAR AK FORCE —-X RTC Boom 1643.3 1b 156 7656 BAR AK FORCE —--X TG Boom 1018.0 1b 157 7658 BAR AK FORCE —--X_RTG Boom 1078.8 1b 158 7660 BAR AK FORCE —--X RTG Boom 1621.5 1b 159 7662 BAR AK FORCE —--X_RTG Boom 1059.8 1b 160 7663 BAR AK FORCE —«--X_-RTG Boom 1627.4 1b 161 7665 BAR AX FORCE ~—-X_RTG Boom 1059.6 1b 162 8010 BAR AX FORCE —SBA Support Struts 879.1 1b 163 8011 BAR AX FORCE —SBA Support Struts 915.1 1b 164 8012 BAR © AK FORCE —SBA Support Struts 897.9 Ib 165 8013 BAR AX FORCE —SBA Support Struts 905.5 1b 166 8014 BAR AX FORCE —SBA Support Struts 1014.0 1b 167 8015 BAR AX FORCE SBA Support Struts 878.0 Ib 168 8016 BAR AX FORCE —SBA Support Struts 904.2 1b 169 8017 BAR AX FORCE SBA Support Struts 1002.4 1b 170 8020 BAR ——-MOMENT-Al SBA Housing 6768.8 in-1b 171 8020 BAR —-MOMENT-A2_ SBA Housing 9967-1 in-1b 172 8131 BAR AX FORCE —Probe Support 3475.4 1b 173 8132 BAR AX FORCE —-Probe Support + 3476.7 174 8133 BAR AX FORCE Probe Support 4556.7 Ib 175 8134 BAR AX FORCE —Probe Support 4546.3 1b 176 8135 BAR AK FORCE —Probe Support 4124.9 1b 177 8136 BAR AX FORCE —Probe Support 4072.4 1b 55Table C2. Galileo Member Loads Aug 88 model - Titan 4/IUS MDMAC Forcing Function Verification Loads LTM (10/02/89) (cont.) Row FEM Element Component Description Member Loads No. No. Type Force 178 8501 BAR AX FORCE —_LTR Longeron 7914.4 Ib 179 8502 BAR AX FORCE —LTR Longeron 8417.3 1b 180 8503 BAR AX FORCE —LTR Longeron 8362.6 1b 181 8504 BAR © AX FORCE —_LTR Longeron 7634.3 1b 182 8505 BAR AX FORCE —_LTR Longeron 7367.8 1b 183 8506 BAR “AK FORCE —LTR Longeron 8833.6 Ib 184 8507 BAR AX FORCE —_LTR Longeron 8913.2°.1b- 185 8508 BAR’ °-°AK FORCE. LTR Longeron 7215.3" Ib 186 8611 BAR AX FORCE —_Despun Skirt Longeron 3556.0 1b 187 8612 BAR AX FORCE —_Despun Skirt Longeron 4036.9 1b 188 8613 BAR AX FORCE —Despun Skirt Longeron 4027.2 1b 189 8614 BAR AX FORCE —_Despun Skirt Longeron 3487.5 lb 190 8615 BAR © AX FORCE —_Despun Skirt Longeron 3706.0 Lb 191 8616 BAR AX FORCE —_Despun Skirt Longeron 4087.4 Ib 192 8617 BAR AX FORCE —Despun Skirt Longeron 4029.3 Ib 193 8618 BAR AX FORCE —Despun Skirt Longeron 3621.6 1b 194 8622 BAR AX FORCE _——Despun Skirt Stiffener 437.5 1b 195 8623 BAR AX FORCE —Despun Skirt Stiffener 419.3 Ib 196 8628 BAR AX FORCE —Despun Skirt Stiffener 519.4 1b 197 8629 BAR AX FORCE _—Despun Skirt stiffener 428.1 1b 198 9151 BAR © AX FORCE Super Zip, Bottom 4293.0 1b 199 9153 BAR AX FORCE Super Zip, Bottom 5090.4 Lb 200 9155 BAR AX FORCE Super Zip, Bottom 5635.2 1b 201 9157 BAR AX FORCE Super Zip, Bottom 5736.7 1b 202 9159 BAR © AX FORCE Super Zip, Bottom 5786.3 1b 203 9161 BAR AX FORCE Super Zip, Bottom 5464.4 Lb 204 9163 BAR © AX FORCE Super Zip, Bottom 5282.5 Lb 205 9165 BAR © AX FORCE Super Zip, Bottom 4864.0 1b 206 9167 BAR AX FORCE — Super Zip, Bottom 4722.2 Ib 207 9169 BAR AX FORCE = Super Zip, Bottom 4515.6 Ib 208 9171 BAR AX FORCE = Super Zip, Bottom 5419.6 lb 209 9173 BAR AX FORCE — Super Zip, Bottom 5719.4 Ib 210 9175 BAR AX FORCE Super Zip, Bottom 6020.0 Ib 211 9177 BAR AX FORCE — Super Zip, Bottom 5458.4 Ib 212 9179 BAR © AX FORCE Super Zip, Bottom 5054.4 1b 213 9181 BAR AX FORCE Super Zip, Bottom 3927.6 Lb 214 0239 BAR © MOMENT-AL TUS Adapter Forward Ring 369.3. in-lb 215 0239 BAR MOMENT-B1 US Adapter Forward Ring 204.0 in-1b 216 0239 BAR AX FORCE US Adapter Forvard Ring 3101.7 1b 217 0343 BAR -MOMENT-A1 ‘TUS Adapter Aft Ring 2751.2 in-Ib 218 0343 BAR © MOMENT-B1 US Adapter Aft Ring 648.2 in-1b 219 0343. BAR AK FORCE —TUS Adapter Aft Ring 2601.2 1b 56Table C2. Galileo Member Loads Aug 88 model - Titan 4/IUS MDMAC Forcing Function Verification Loads LIM (10/02/89) (cont. ) Row FEM Element Component Description Member Loads No. No. Type Force 220 1751 BAR MOMENT-Al IUS Adapter Longeron Stiff, 2370.3. in-Ib 221 1751 BAR MOMENT-BL IUS Adapter Longeron Stiff 606.7 in-1b 222 1751 BAR AX FORCE —_IUS Adapter Longeron Stiff 5789.7 Yb 223 2100 CONROD AX FORCE Bus, Upper Ring 2934.6 Ib 224 2170 GCONROD AX FORCE Bus, Lower Ring 1040.9 1b 225 2200 CONROD AX FORCE Bus, Upper Ring 1492.0 1b 226 2270 CONROD’ AX FORCE Bus, Lower Ring 2 2 961.0 Ube sai 227 2300 CONROD’ AX FORCE ~~ Bus,-Upper Ring: 2864.4 1b’ 228 2370 GCONROD AX FORCE Bus, Lower Ring 918.2 1b 229 2400 CONROD AX FORCE Bus, Upper Ring 654.7 lb 230 2470 CONROD AX FORCE Bus, Lower Ring 889.5 1b 231 2500 CONROD AX FORCE Bus, Upper Ring 338.1 1b 232 2570 CONROD AX FORCE Bus, Lower Ring 866.5 1b 233 2631 CONROD AX FORCE Bus, Upper Ring 3345.2 1b 234 2632 CONROD AX FORCE Bus, Upper Ring 2860.4 1b 235 2633 CONROD AX FORCE Bus, Upper Ring 3452.2 1b 236 2649 CONROD AX FORCE Bus, Lower Ring 1074.8 1b 237 2650 CONROD AX FORCE Bus, Lower Ring 963.4 1b 238 2700 CONROD AX FORCE Bus, Upper Ring 467.0 Lb 239 2770 CONROD AX FORCE Bus, Lower Ring 848.3 Ib 240 2800 CONROD AX FORCE Bus, Upper Ring 624.8 1b 241 2870 CONROD AX FORCE Bus, Lower Ring 878.5 1b 242 4851 CONROD AX FORCE Bay E Support 331.0 1b 243 4852 CONROD AX FORCE Bay E Support 1432.7 1b 244 4853 CONROD AX FORCE Bay E Support 1369.4 1b 245 4854 CONROD AK FORCE Bay E Support. 298.4 1b 246 4855 CONROD AX FORCE Bay E Support 1254.5 1b 247 4856 CONROD AX FORCE Bay E Support 1503.2 1b 248 4857 CONROD AX FORCE Bay E Support 518.8 1b 249 9101 QUADS —MEMB-Y TRW Adapter, Fwd Skin 518.4 1b/in 250 9109 QUADS —MEMB-Y TRW Adapter, Fwd Skin 706.8 1b/in 251 9117 QUADS MEMB-Y TRW Adapter, Fwd Skin 547.0 1b/in 252 9125 QUADS MEMB-Y TRW Adapter, Fd Skin 739.8 lb/in 253° 9204 QUADS MEMB-Y TRW Adapter, Mid Skin 599.3 b/in 254 9212 QUAD4 MEMB-Y TRW Adapter, Mid Skin 642.5 lb/in 255 9220 QUADS MEMB-Y TRW Adapter, Mid Skin 625.5 lb/in 256 9228 QUADS MEMB-Y TRW Adapter, Mid Skin 624.4 Ib/in 257 9307 QUAD4 MEMB-Y TRW Adapter, Aft Skin 540.2 1b/in 258 9315 QUAD4 MEMB-Y TRW Adapter, Aft Skin 455.4 Ib/in 259° 9323 QUAD4 —MEMB-Y TRW Adapter, Aft Skin 503.0 1b/in 260 9331 QUADS MEMB-Y TRW Adapter, Aft Skin 428.2 Ib/in 261 9401 QUADG MEMB-Y © Lower Adapter, Fwd Skin 260.0 1b/in 262 9409 QUAD4 MEMB-Y Lower Adapter, Fwd Skin 266.4 lb/in 263 9417 QUADS MEMB-Y Lower Adapter, Fwd Skin 247.3 Ib/in 264 9425 QUADS MEMB-Y Lower Adapter, Fwd Skin 261.1 1b/in 37‘Table C2. Galileo Member Loads Aug 88 model - Titan 4/IUS MDMAC Forcing Function Verification Loads LTM (10/02/89) (cont.) Row FEM Element Component Description Member Loads No. No. Type Force 265 9706 QUADG MEMB-X Lower Adapter, Aft Skin 72.9 1b/in 266 9706 QUADA MEMB-Y Lower Adapter, Aft Skin 313.4 lb/in 267 9714 QUAD4 MEMB-X Lower Adapter, Aft Skin 61.4 1b/in 268 9714 QUAD4 MEMB-Y Lower Adapter, Aft Skin 147.3. Ib/in 269 9722 QUAD MEMB-X © Lower Adapter, Aft Skin 136.9 1b/in 270 9722 QUADS MEMB-Y Lower Adapter, Aft Skin 477.0 Ib/in 271 9730 QUAD MEMB-X Lower Adapter, Aft Skin 57.4 Ib/in + 272 9730 QUADS" MEMB-Y Lower Adapter, Aft Skin ~~ "305.6 lb/in 273 0067 QUADS MEMB-X IUS Adapter Fwd Skin 281.1 1b/in 27% 0067 QUADS MEMB-Y TUS Adapter Fwd Skin 483.8 Lb/in 275 0067 QUADS MEMB-XY TUS Adapter Fwd Skin 56.9 Ib/in 276 1053 QUADS MEMB-X IUS Adapter Aft Skin 221.3 lb/in 277 1053 QUAD4 —MEMB-Y IUS Adapter Aft Skin 18.4 1b/in 278 1053 QUADS MEMB-XY _—_—‘IUS Adapter Aft Skin 231.2 lb/in 279 2067 QUAD4 © MEMB-X IUS Adap Longeron Fwd Web 356.7. lb/in 280 2067 QUAD4 MEMB-Y IUS Adap Longeron Fwd Web 598.7 lb/in 281 2067 QUADS © MEMB-XY TUS Adap Longeron Fwd Web 71.0. 1b/in 282 2651 ROD AX FORCE Bus, Lower Ring 1738.5 1b 283 4001 ROD AX FORCE —Despun Box, Launch 882.5 1b 284 4003 ROD AX FORCE —Despun Box, Outboard 949.2 1b 285 4007 ROD AX FORCE —Despun Box, Cruise 2775.3 Ib 286 4008 ROD AX FORCE —Despun Box, Cruise 2024.5 Lb 287 4009 ROD AX FORCE —Despun Box, Cruise 1488.4 1b 288 4098 ROD AX FORCE —Despun Box, Launch 2953.3 Lb 289 4101 ROD AX FORCE —Despun Box, Launch 1111.7 Lb 290 4103 ROD AX FORCE —Despun Box, Outboard 969.0 1b 291 4107 ROD AX FORCE _—Despun Box, Cruise 2606.8 1b 292 4108 ROD AX FORCE —Despun Box, Cruise 2449.7 Lb 293 4109 ROD AK FORCE —Despun Box, Cruise 1805.9 1b 29% 4126 ROD AK FORCE —Despun Box, Outboard 2092.6 1b 295 4127 ROD AK FORCE —Despun Box, Outboard 1708.9 1b 296 2116 SHEAR SHEAR-23 | Bus, Longeron Web 173.7 Ib/in 297 2216 SHEAR SHEAR-23 Bus, Longeron Web 156.6 1b/in 298 2316 SHEAR SHEAR-23 | Bus, Longeron Web 175.5 lb/in 299 2416 SHEAR SHEAR-23 Bus, Longeron Web 159.0 1b/in 300 2516 SHEAR SHEAR-23 Bus, Longeron Web 234.8 Ib/in 301 2616 SHEAR SHEAR-23 Bus, Longeron Web 207.7 Ib/in 302 2716 SHEAR SHEAR-23 Bus, Longeron Web 152.6 b/in 303 2816 SHEAR SHEAR-23 Bus, Longeron Web 234.3 lb/in 304 3702 TRIA3 MEMB-X IUS Adap Longeron Aft Web 57.7 lb/in 305 3702 TRIA3 MEMB-Y IUS Adap Longeron Aft Web 1351.1 1b/in 306 3702 TRIA3 MEMB-XY IUS Adap Longeron Aft Web 265.4 1b/in 58Table C2. Galileo Member Loads Aug 88 model - Titan 4/IUS MDMAC Forcing Function Verification Loads LTM (10/02/89) (cont.) Row FEM Element Component Description Member Loads No. No. Type Force 307 4221 JOINT FORCE-Tl —_Despun Box Corners 1318.3 1b 308 4221 JOINT FORCE-T2 —_Despun Box Corners 1961.6 1b 309 4221 JOINT FORCE-T3 Despun Box Corners 2374.5 1b 310 4231 JOINT FORCE-Tl —Despun Box Corners 0 1b 311 4231 JOINT FORCE-T2 Despun Box Corners 10 1b 312 4231 JOINT FORCE-T3 Despun Box Corners 10 1b 313 4234 JOINT FORCE-Tl Box Ball Latch 3326.3 Lb 314 4234 JOINT. . FORCE-T2 .-.Box Ball Latch» =" 1978.6 1b 315 4234 JOINT FORCE=T3 “Box Ball Latch 1636.9 Lb 316 4236 JOINT FORCE-Tl Box Ball Latch 2059.7 1b 317 4236 JOINT FORCE-T2 Box Ball Latch 2208.5 1b 318 4236 JOINT FORCE-T3 Box Ball Latch 2397.8 1b 319 5118 JOINT FORCE-Tl Science Boom Tripod Pin 1208.5 1b 320 5118 JOINT FORCE-T2 Science Boom Tripod Pin 967.2 1b 321 5125 JOINT FORCE-Tl Science Boom W-Truss Pin 650.7 1b 322 $125 JOINT FORCE-T2 Science Boom W-Truss Pin 1580.9 1b 323 $126 JOINT FORCE-Tl Science Boom W-Truss Pin 699.8 Ib 324 5126 JOINT FORCE-T2 Science Boom W-Truss Pin 1666.7 1b 325 5150 JOINT FORCE-Tl Science Boom W-Truss 917.2 1b 326 6201 JOINT FORCE-T1 Scan Ball Latch 1210.0 1b 327 6201 JOINT FORCE-T2 Scan Ball Latch 997.5 1b 328 6201 JOINT FORCE-T3 Scan Ball Latch 2021.9 1b 329 6202 JOINT FORCE-Tl Scan Ball Latch 859.2 1b 330 6202 JOINT FORCE-T2 Scan Ball Latch 1109.3 1b 331 6202 JOINT FORCE-T3 Scan Ball Latch 1437.5 1b 332 7021 JOINT FORCE-Tl +X RIG Bipod Pin 620.3 1b 333 7021 JOINT FORCE-T2 +X RTG Bipod Pin 698.4 1b 334 7220 JOINT FORCE-Tl +X RTG W-Truss Pin 578.8 Ib 335 7220 JOINT FORCE-T2 4X RTG W-Truss Pin 1081.1 1b 336 7221 JOINT FORCE-T1 +X RTG W-Truss Pin 1007.1 1b 337 7221 JOINT FORCE-T2 +X RTG W-Truss Pin 739.2 Ib 338 7425 JOINT FORCE-T2 4X RTG W-Truss 527.2 1b 339 7521 JOINT FORCE-Tl -X RTG Bipod Pin 753.5 1b 340 7521 JOINT FORCE-T2 -X RTG Bipod Pin 822.3 1b 341 7720 JOINT FORCE-Tl —-X RTG W-Truss Pin 1097.1 1b 342 7720 JOINT FORCE-T2 —-X RTG W-Truss Pin 769.7 Ib 343° 7721 JOINT FORCE-Tl —-X RIG W-Truss Pin 593.4 1b 344 7721 JOINT FORCE-T2 -X RTG W-Truss Pin 1175.5 1b 345 7925 JOINT FORCE-T2 -X RTG W-Truss 547.0 1b 346 8381 JOINT FORCE-T1 —-RPM/LTR Joint 1282.5 1b 347 8381 JOINT FORCE-T2 —RPM/LIR Joint 5364.7 1b 348 8381 JOINT FORCE-T3 —RPM/LTR Joint 10554.6 1b 349, 8381 JOINT » MOMENT-R1l RPM/LTR Joint 2787.3 in-1b 350° 8381 JOINT MOMENT-R2 RPM/LTR Joint 2118.3 in-lb 351 8381 JOINT MOMENT-R3 RPM/LTR Joint 1352.5 in-1b 39Table C2. Galileo Member Loads Aug 88 model - Titan 4/IUS MDMAC Forcing Function Verification Loads LTM (10/02/89) (cont. ) Row FEM Element Component Description Member Loads No. No. Type Force 352 8382 JOINT FORCE-Tl RPM/LTR Joint 1459.4 Ib 353 8382 JOINT FORCE-T2 | RPM/LTR Joint 4416.3 1b 354 8382 JOINT FORCE-T3 RPM/LTR Joint 10658.9 1b 355 8382 JOINT MOMENT-R1 RPM/LTR Joint 2982.1 in-1b 356 8382 JOINT MOMENT-R2 RPM/LIR Joint 2391.2 in-Ib 357 8382 JOINT MOMENT-R3 RPM/LTR Joint 1166.4 in-1b 358 8383 JOINT FORCE-Tl RPM/LTR Joint 1426.9 1b 359 8383 JOINT FORCE-T2 .RPM/LTR Joint... ~~ ~ 4390.0. 1b - 360 8383 JOINT FORCE-T3 RPM/LTR Joint 10647.7 1b 361 8383 JOINT MOMENT-R1 RPM/LTR Joint 3089.8 in-1b 362 8383 JOINT MOMENT-R2 RPM/LTR Joint 2311.1 in-1b 363 8383 JOINT MOMENT-R3 RPM/LTR Joint 846.8 in-1b 364 8384 JOINT FORCE-Tl RPM/LTR Joint 1129.4 1b 365 8384 JOINT FORCE-T2 RPM/LTR Joint 5306.6 1b 366 8384 JOINT FORCE-T3 RPM/LTR Joint 1073.3 1b 367 8384 JOINT MOMENT-R1 RPM/LTR Joint 2752.5 in-1b 368 8384 JOINT MOMENT-R2 RPM/LTR Joint 2162.8 in-1b 369 8384 JOINT MOMENT-R3 RPM/LTR Joint 1106.0 in-1b 370 8385 JOINT FORCE-Tl —RPM/LTR Joint 1258.2 1b 371 8385 JOINT FORCE-T2 —RPM/LTR Joint 5136.1 1b 372 8385 JOINT FORCE-T3 —RPM/LTR Joint 9747.1 1b 373 8385 JOINT MOMENT-R1 RPM/LTR Joint 2465.5 in-1b 374 8385 JOINT MOMENT-R2 — RPM/LTR Joint 1976.5 in-1b 375 8385 JOINT MOMENT-R3 RPM/LIR Joint 1260.1 in-1b 376 8386 JOINT FORCE-Tl RPM/LTR Joint 1410.7 1b 377 8386 JOINT FORCE-T2 —RPM/LTR Joint 4094.4 1b 378 8386 JOINT FORCE-T3 —RPM/LTR Joint 11106.8 1b 379 8386 JOINT MOMENT-R1 RPM/LTR Joint 3256.2 in-lb 380 8386 JOINT MOMENT-R2 RPM/LTR Joint 2076.8 in-1b 381 8386 JOINT MOMENT-R3 RPM/LTR Joint 1271.5 in-1b 382 8387 JOINT FORCE-Tl —_RPM/LTR Joint 1349.4 1b 383 8387. JOINT FORCE-T2 —-RPM/LTR Joint 4092.0 1b 384 8387 JOINT FORCE-T3 —-RPM/LTR Joint 11051.8 1b 385 8387 JOINT MOMENT-R1 RPM/LTR Joint 3452.1 in-1b 386 8387 JOINT MOMENT-R2 RPM/LTR Joint 1992.0 in-1b 387 8387 JOINT MOMENT-R3 RPM/LTR Joint 973.1 in-lb 388 8388 JOINT FORCE-Tl —RPM/LTR Joint 1100.8 1b 389 8388 JOINT FORCE-T2 —RPM/LTR Joint 5072.7 1b 390 8388 JOINT FORCE-T3 | RPM/LTR Joint 9535.4 1b 391 8388 JOINT MOMENT-R1 RPM/LTR Joint 3018.1 in-1b 392 8388 JOINT MOMENT-R2 RPM/LTR Joint 2276.9 in-lb 393 8388 JOINT MOMENT-R3_RPM/LTR Joint 962.0 in-1b 394 1905 JOINT FORCE-Tl © GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 3240.2 1b 395 1005 JOINT FORCE-T2 GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 5121.2 1b 396 1005 JOINT FORCE-T3 GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 13034.0 1b 60Table C2. Galileo Member Loads Aug 88 model - Titan 4/IUS MDMAC Forcing Function Verification Loads LIM (10/02/89) (cont..) Row FEM Element Component Description Member Loads No. No. Type Force 397 1005 JOINT MOMENT-R1 GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 2019.1 in-Ib 398 1005 JOINT MOMENT-R2 GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 2194.7 in-1b 399 1005 JOINT MOMENT-R3 GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 1976.1 in-Ib 400 1011 JOINT FORCE-Tl GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 4919.3 1b 401 1011 JOINT FORCE-T2 GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 4351.0 1b 402 1011 JOINT FORCE-T3_GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 18128.1 1b 403 1011 JOINT MOMENT-R1 _GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 2376.4 in-Ib- : 404 1011 JOINT’ MOMENT-R2~“GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 3354.6 in-1b 405 1011 JOINT MOMENT-R3 GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 2801.4 in-1b 406 1023 JOINT FORCE-Tl GLL-TUS I/F Bolt Load 5114.4 Ib 407 1023 JOINT FORCE-T2 GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 4412.4 Ib 408 1023 JOINT FORCE-T3 GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 18557.1 1b 409 1023 JOINT MOMENT-R1 GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 2459.3. in-1b 410 1023 JOINT MOMENT-R2 GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 3664.9 in-1b 411 1023 JOINT MOMENT-R3_ GLL-IUS 1/F Bolt Load 3045.4 in-1b 412 1029 JOINT FORCE-T1 —GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 3292.2 1b 413 1029 JOINT FORCE-T2 GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 5299.7 1b 414 1029 JOINT FORCE-T3 GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 13204:1 1b 415 1029 JOINT MOMENT-R1 GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 2038.7 in-1b 416 1029 JOINT MOMENT-R2 GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 2256.0 in-1b 417 1029 JOINT MOMENT-R3 GLL-IUS 1/F Bolt Load 2023.0 in-1b 418 1037 JOINT FORCE-Tl GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 3065.4 1b 419 1037 JOINT FORCE-T2 GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 4933.5 Ib 420 1037 JOINT FORCE-T3 GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 12499.5 1b 421 1037 JOINT MOMENT-R1 GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 1964.7 in-1b 422 1037 JOINT MOMENT-R2 GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 2030.4 in-1b 423 1037 JOINT MOMENT-R3 GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 1904.0 in-1b 424 1043 JOINT FORCE-Tl GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 5066.5 1b 425 1043 JOINT FORCE-T2 GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 4284.0 Ib 426 1043 JOINT FORCE-T3 GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 18476.9 1b 427 1043 JOINT MOMENT-R1 GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 2685.7 in-1b 428 1043 JOINT MOMENT-R2 GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 3594.1 in-1b 429 1043 JOINT MOMENT-R3_ GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 3172.0 in-1b 430 1055 JOINT FORCE-Tl GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 5217.7 1b 431 1055 JOINT FORCE-T2 GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 4428.6 Ib 432 1055 JOINT FORCE-T3 GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 18845.1 1b 433 1055 JOINT MOMENT-R1 GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 2596.0 in-1b 434 1055 JOINT MOMENT-R2 GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 3805.3 in-1b 435 1055 JOINT MOMENT-R3 GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 3336.7 in-1b 436 1061 JOINT FORCE-Tl GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 3140.7 Ib 437 1061 JOINT FORCE-T2 GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 4951.3 Ib 438 1061 JOINT FORCE-T3 GLL-IUS 1/F Bolt Load 12736.4 1b 439 1061 JOINT MOMENT-R1 GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 1894.4 in-1b 440 1061 JOINT MOMENT-R2 GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 2086.9 in-1b 441 1061 JOINT MOMENT-R3 GLL-IUS I/F Bolt Load 1955.4 in-1b 61Table C2, Galileo Member Loads Aug 88 model - Titan 4/IUS MDMAC Forcing Function Verification Loads LTM (10/02/89) (cont. ) Row FEM Element Component Description Member Loads No. No. Type Force 442 1200 STACUT FORCE-FK SXA Base Sta Cut (Z=-62.328) 1317.3 1b 443 1200 STACUT FORCE-FY SXA Base Sta Cut (Z=-62.328) 1509.8 Ib 444 1200 STACUT FORCE-FZ SKA Base Sta Cut (Z--62.328) 472.1 1b 4&5 1200 STACUT MOMENT-MX SKA Base Sta Cut (Z=-62.328) 105720.8 in-1b 4&6 1200 STACUT MOMENT-MY SXA Base Sta Cut (Z~-62.328) 95209.4 in-1b 447 1200 STACUT MOMENT-MZ SKA Base Sta Cut (Z~-62.328) © 157.0 in-lb 448 3000. STACUT FORCE-FX Bus-RPM Stat Cut 32.992).-. 4570.6 -1b> 449 3000" STACUT “FORCE-FY Bus-RPM Stat Cut 2.992) © 6440.6 Ib 450 3000 STACUT FORCE-FZ Bus-RPM Stat Cut (Z=-32.992) 11270.0 1b 451 3000 STACUT MOMENT-MK Bus-RPM Stat Cut (Z=-32.992) 317336.0 in-1b 452 3000 STACUT MOMENT-MY Bus-RPM Stat Cut (Z=-32.992) 317768.0 in-1b 453 3000 STACUT MOMENT-MZ Bus-RPM Stat Cut (Z=-32.992) 113977.1 in-1b 454 3500 STACUT FORCE-FK RPM-LTR Stat Cut (Z-0.0) 12887.8 1b 435 3500 STACUT FORCE-FY RPM-LTR Stat Cut (Z~0.0) 18459.1 1b 456 3500 STACUT FORCE-FZ RPM-LTR Stat Cut (2=0.0) 27803.0 1b 457 3500 STACUT MOMENT-MX RPM-LTR Stat Cut (Z=0.0) 679799.1 in-1b 458 3500 STACUT MOMENT-MY RPM-LTR Stat Cut (Z=0.0) 545435.1 in-1b 459 3500 STACUT MOMENT-MZ RPM-LTR Stat Cut (Z-0.0) 237881.1 in-1b 460 8700 STACUT FORCE-FX LIR-Skirt St Cut (Z—4.5) 13592.6 1b 461 8700 STACUT FORCE-FY LIR-Skirt St Cut (Z-4.5) 19804.2 1b 462 8700 STACUT FORCE-FZ LIR-Skirt St Cut (Z=4.5) 28392.0 1b 463 8700 STACUT MOMENT-MX LTR-Skirt St Cut (Z=4.5) 788449.4 in-1b 464 8700 STACUT MOMENT-MY LTR-Skirt St Cut (Z=4.5) 611244.1 in-1b 465 8700 STACUT MOMENT-MZ LTR-Skirt St Cut (Z=4.5) 239110.1 in-1b 466 9100 STACUT FORCE-FX TRW Adap Fwd Cut (Z=21.5) 16304.7 1b 467 9100 STACUT FORCE-FY TRW Adap Fwd Cut (Z=21.5) 26714.8 1b 468 9100 STACUT FORCE-FZ TRW Adap Fwd Cut (2=21.5) 35412.6 1b 469 9100 STACUT MOMENT-MK TRW Adap Fwd Cut (221.5) 1106712.0 in-1b 470 9100 STACUT MOMENT-MY TRW Adap Fwd Cut (Z=21.5) 818377.3 in-lb 471 9100 STACUT MOMENT-MZ TRW Adap Fwd Cut (Z=21.5) 279720.9 in-1b 472 9400 STACUT FORCE-FX TRW Adap Aft Cut (245.75) 17777.9 1b 473 9400 STACUT FORCE-FY TRW Adap Aft Cut (245.75) 26527.6 1b 474 9400 STACUT FORCE-FZ TRW Adap Aft Cut (2-45.75) _37585.5 1b 475 9400 STACUT MOMENT-¥X TRW Adap Aft Cut (Z=45.75) 1739395.0 in-1b 476 9400 STACUT MOMENT-MY TRW Adap Aft Cut (Z=45.75) 1182276.0 in-1b 477 9400 STACUT MOMENT-MZ TRW Adap Aft Cut (2-45.75) 414468.3 in-1b 478 9800 STACUT FORCE-FX IUS Adap Fwd Cut (Z=77.5) 1777.9 Ib 479 9800 STACUT FORCE-FY IUS Adap Fwd Cut (2=77.5) 26527.7 1b 480 9800 STACUT FORCE-FZ IUS Adap Fwd Cut (2=77.5) 37585.5 1b 481 9800 STACUT MOMENT-IK IUS Adap Fwd Cut (2-77.5) 2554441.0 in-1b 482 9800 STACUT MOMENT-MY IUS Adap Fud Cut (2=77.5) 1704449.0 in-1b 483" 9800 STACUT MOMENT-MZ IUS Adap Fud Cut (2=77.5) 414468.5 in-1b 62Table c2. Row No. 434 485 486 487 488 489 No. 9900 9900 9900 9900 9900 9900 Galileo Member Loads Aug 88 model - Titan 4/IUS MDMAC Forcing Function Verification Loads LIM (10/02/89) Element Type STACUT STACUT STACUT STACUT STACUT STACUT Component Force FORCE-FX GLL-IUS FORCE-FY GLL-IUS FORCE-FZ GLL-IUS MOMENT-¥X GLL-IUS MOMENT-MY GLL-IUS MOMENT-MZ GLL-IUS Description VF VF I/F LF I/F /F 63 Gut (287.5) Cut (287.5) Cut (287.5) Cut (287.5) Cut (2487.5) Cut (287.5) (cont) Member Loads 17909.2 1b 2679.4 Ib 38344.1 Lb 2823221.0 in-1b 1876550.0 in-1b 419866.8 in-1b