Track Substructure Maintenance--From Theory to Practice

by

Ernest T. Selig, P.h.D., P.E.

Emeritus Professor of Civil Engineering at
the University of Massachusetts
and President of Ernest T. Selig, Inc.
105 Middle Street
Hadley, MA 01035
Phone: (413) 586-1449
Fax: (413) 585-9392
[email protected]

and

Darrell D. Cantrell
Past President, AREMA
and Senior Consultant
Cantrell Rail Services, Inc.
805 Willow Court
Keller, TX 76248
Phone: (812) 281-3477
[email protected]

Prepared for American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association

Annual Conference
Chicago, Illinois
September 9-12, 2001
 Track Substructure Maintenance--From Theory to Practice

by

Ernest T. Selig, P.h.D., P.E. and Darrell D. Cantrell

Abstract

The three main components of track substructure are ballast, subballast and subgrade.

Their functions and how they are achieved will be reviewed. All three components must be

present and functioning satisfactorily for good track performance. Substructure maintenance is

mainly concentrated on the ballast and the need is usually dictated by track geometry

deterioration. Second in priority for substructure maintenance are drainage ditches. The

principles of drainage will be summarized. In practice drainage is often given inadequate

attention. The cost of maintenance or, conversely, the deterioration of track components, is

directly impacted by the condition of the drainage system. Information on these cost factors will

be presented. When normal maintenance operations cannot provide satisfactory track

performance, reconstruction will be needed. This usually involves work on the subballast,

subgrade or drainage system to repair the defects. Subgrade treatment methods are described.

These are more expensive, and more difficult to accomplish tasks, and more disruptive to

revenue traffic. Thus a goal of maintenance planning should be to minimize the need for the

reconstruction by not allowing chronic problems to develop or persist, to the extent possible.

Guidelines for maintenance practice will be presented. The paper also emphasizes the

importance of determining the cause of the maintenance problems in order to apply the proper

solutions. A follow up investigation is recommended to evaluate the results. Finally education

programs are recommended to provide a much needed understanding of the fundamentals of

track substructure behavior.

INTRODUCTION

The substructure consists of ballast, subballast, and subgrade. The need for substructure

maintenance stems from the development of excessive geometry deviations (track

roughness). Track geometry loss results from movements in the ballast, subballast, and

subgrade. However, adjustment of geometry is done by rearranging the ballast. There

are various causes of geometry loss which need to be identified to know how to improve

track performance. The amount of maintenance required is influenced by decisions made

during design and construction or rehabilitation of the track. The railroad may choose to

correct the geometry faults by tamping as needed. This should only be done where

needed, but tamping is often extended to adjacent areas that do not need adjusting.

Tamping is appropriate, but it does damage the ballast and may not be economical in

frequently reoccurring problem spots. Further, tamping does not correct the root cause of

the roughness. Thus the need to find the cause and fix the problem arises (1).

If the tamping improvement does not last long enough, then the ballast condition

should be checked. If the fouling is excessive then undercutting with the addition of new

ballast as needed will be programmed, or alternatively the track will be raised so that

additional ballast can be placed under the ties. If excessive fouling is not the problem or

if the undercutting process does not improve the performance, then an examination is

required to determine the cause of the reoccurring geometry problem.

The drainage of railway track is recognized as a fundamental, yet often neglected

aspect of track design. Track drainage significantly affects track performance and track

maintenance requirements. A complete drainage system must include means of handling

water flowing over the ground surface towards the track, shedding or draining water

falling onto the track, and controlling water from the subgrade (2).

SUBSTRUCTURE COMPONENTS

The ballast is the top structural layer that, among other things, holds the track in place,

reduces the stress transmitted to the subgrade, and facilitates the geometry adjustment

through tamping (3,4). Fouling is the main cause of ballast problems. Once the cause of

the fouling is determined the solutions can easily be identified and applied.

The best choice of ballast for a particular location is the most cost-effective

choice, taking into consideration traffic, environmental conditions, and cost of material

delivered to the site. The best choice, therefore, will not necessarily be the highest

quality material or the material that has the lowest delivered cost. These costs include

purchase and transportation of ballast as well as tamping and undercutting/cleaning.

The subballast is the second structural layer that helps the ballast reduce the stress

to subgrade, maintains separation between the ballast and subgrade particles, and plays an

important role in track drainage (1). Subballast deserves more attention than it gets

because of its importance to track performance. Filter fabric (geotextile) has frequently

been used to fulfill some of these subballast functions, but investigations have shown that

fabric is not generally desirable (1). Asphalt concrete is an alternative or supplement to

sand/gravel subballast materials, but the economics will probably limit asphalt to special

cases.

Subgrade serves as the platform for the structural layers, and so it must be stable.

The subgrade has many modes of failure such as: attrition, squeeze, progressive
compression under repeated loading, consolidation, massive shear, frost heave/thaw

softening and swelling and shrinking from moisture change (1). Investigation is needed to

know which is the cause of the subgrade problem in a specific case in order to choose the

correct cure. This determination may be easy, but often it can be very challenging.

Subgrade problems are clearly more difficult to correct, than ballast or subballast

problems, especially after the track has been constructed. But there are a lot of possible

solutions to subgrade problems.

BALLAST FOULING

Over a period of time in track the ballast gradation typically becomes broader and finer

than the initial condition because the larger ballast particles will break into smaller

particles and additional smaller particles from a variety of sources will infiltrate the voids

between the ballast particles. This process is known as fouling. Fouling deteriorates

ballast performance and eventually requires undercutting/cleaning or track raising with

ballast replacement when tamping improvements do not last long enough

Five categories of fouling material have been identified: 1) particles entering from

the surface such as wind blown sand or coal falling out of cars; 2) products of wood or

concrete tie wear; 3) breakage and abrasion of the ballast particles; 4) particles migrating

upward from the granular layer underlying the ballast; and 5) migration of particles from

the subgrade (1). The main causes of ballast fouling must be identified if proper steps are

to be taken to reduce the rate of fouling. The most frequent cause of ballast fouling is

ballast breakdown, but there are individual situations in which each one of the other

categories predominates.
 Geotextiles (filter fabrics) generally have not been found to be useful in solving

ballast fouling problems. A proper subballast layer is the best cure for fouling from the

underlying granular layer and from the subgrade. When subgrade is the source of fouling

material one of two main mechanisms usually is present: 1) abrasion of the subgrade

surface by ballast particles in contact with the subgrade, or 2) hydraulic erosion of water-

filled cracks in the subgrade subjected to repeated train loading.

BALLAST/SUBBALLAST LAYER THICKNESS

The thickness of the ballast layer beneath the ties generally should be the minimum that

is required for the ballast to perform its intended functions. Typically this will be 12 to

18 in.. The minimum subballast layer thickness beneath the ballast should be 6 in. Thus,

the minimum granular layer thickness beneath the ties would be 18 to 24 in. A check

then needs to made to determine whether this is enough thickness to prevent

overstressing the subgrade (5,6). An overstressed subgrade will result in rapid loss of

geometry under train traffic.

BALLAST CLEANING AND RENEWAL

Ballast cleaning and renewal is an expensive and time-consuming process which is also

highly disruptive to train traffic. Thus, the need for this process must be considered

carefully. Basically ballast cleaning and renewal is required when the ballast becomes so

fouled that it cannot fulfill its functions.

Care must be taken during ballast cleaning to prevent removing or damaging the

existing subballast layer. Care must also be taken to ensure that the width and inclination

of the cut surface are such that the water collecting in the cleaned ballast is able to flow
freely across the cut surface and into the track side drainage system. Effort made to

achieve a geometrically smooth cut surface will also improve the stability of the track

geometry under subsequent traffic after the cleaning and renewal process is completed.

The economic benefit of ballast cleaning and renewal will not occur unless the

drainage system is functioning as well (7). Thus, a ballast cleaning and renewal program

should also accommodate installing or repairing the drainage system. It is also desirable

to evaluate the cause of the ballast fouling and consider taking steps to correct the cause

of the fouling in order to reduce the amount of future undercutting.

Shoulder cleaning can lengthen the time before undercutting cleaning is required

(7). The shoulder cleaning must include the full depth of the shoulder all the way out to

the ballast toe. Shoulder cleaning improves drainage by shortening the drainage path of

water out from under the ties and increases the depth of drainage below that which is

typically achieved with undercutting/cleaning. Partial depth undercutting will not result

in effective drainage of water from the uncleaned lower portion of the ballast layer.

Shoulder cleaning also allows migration of fouling materials out from under the

track into the clean voids in the shoulder in order for the fouling material to migrate, the

fouling particles must be much smaller than the voids in the ballast and need a forcing

mechanism such as flowing water or pumping by repeated train loading. When the

fouling material results from breakdown of the ballast in a way that produces a broad

range of particle sizes, migration of the fouling material is not likely to be significant.

SUBGRADE TREATMENT METHODS

The following are a few examples of subgrade remedial treatment methods:

1. Grouting--Some grouts penetrate the voids of the soils (permeation grouting) and

strengthen them or reduce water seepage. Other grouts compact and reinforce the

soils (compaction grouting) to strengthen them or displace the soils to compensate for

settlement. Jet grouting mixes cement with soil to form columns of strengthened soil.

2. Soil mixing--A process in which soil is mixed with augers and paddles to create a

mixture of soil and cement based grout. Soil mixing creates a column of strengthened

soil for compression and shear reinforcement.

3. Lime modification of clay properties--Lime can be used to improve the properties of

clay. Techniques for mixing lime with clay include mechanical mixing (admixture

stabilization) and quicklime piles. Injecting lime into clay in slurry form has been

performed with the expectation of improving the clay properties. This is a common

but not usually effective treatment with often undesirable side effects, e.g. slurry

injection can fracture clay instead of penetrating the voids and also solidifies ballast

(8).

4. Reconstruction--Compaction of existing soils or replacing them with better soils will

give improved subgrade. Chemicals can also be mechanically mixed with the soils in

layers which are then recompacted to form a stronger or less reactive soil. The

chemistry of the soils should be checked or tests performed to verify the effectiveness

of the treatment, because some combinations can be harmful.

5. Reinforcement--Various plastic grids, metal strips or cellular materials placed in the

soils give tensile reinforcement. Alternatively, steel reinforcing can be installed in

the subgrade soils through techniques such as soil nailing, soil doweling and

micropiling.
6. Stress reduction--Increasing the thickness of the ballast and subballast will reduce the

pressure on the weaker subgrade caused by the train loading. Contrary to the

AREMA engineering manual, the allowable pressure is not constant, but varies

widely and must be determined in each case for correct design. The correct strength

considers the magnitude of the repeated loading from the trains and the number of

repetitions. For a given axle load, a high tonnage line would have a much lower

apparent strength than a low tonnage line. Thus the high tonnage line needs a greater

ballast/subballast thickness for the same subgrade properties (5,6).

IMPORTANCE OF PROPER INVESTIGATION

A fundamental limitation of common railroad practice regarding substructure remedial

work is the lack of a proper investigation to diagnose the cause of the problem before

attempting a solution. A proper investigation includes using trained personnel who

understand the fundamentals of what is being observed and recognize appropriate

solutions.

This limitation of inadequate investigation is compounded by not following up to

evaluate the results of the remedial work. Thus, sometimes improvements occur but for

reasons other than the ones expected. Other times improvements do not occur, and

sometimes the problem gets worse. In these cases the reasons will not be known without

a follow up investigation. One consequence of inadequate follow up is that the decision

about whether or not to use the same method elsewhere cannot be reliably made.

The inevitable result of investigation deficiencies is inefficient use of maintenance

resources or a poor return on the investment. An example is that mud in the ballast is
commonly thought to derive from subgrade soil particles. This has led to the

inappropriate use of filter fabric. Investigations have shown that subgrade is rarely the

source of the mud and even in cases where it was, the fabric did not stop the mud.

Although the filter fabric can usually be omitted some other action is still needed to fix

the problem.

NEED FOR GOOD TECHNOLOGY

For reasons of safety, reliability, and profitability railroads need to use the best

technology available. This challenge increases with increasing traffic, increasing axle

loads and higher speed trains, as well as decreasingly available work windows. Mixing

these together on the same track is even a bigger challenge. Another challenge is the

problem of track transitions that occur at turnouts, bridges, and tunnels for example.

A lot of substructure technology is available that is not being applied. One reason

for this situation is the insufficient use of education programs to learn about the

possibilities. Another reason often mentioned is that the investigation and the remedial

work are too expensive. The answer to this is to do a complete cost/benefit evaluation.

Proper use of good technology will improve the economics, and no doubt pay for its

implementation (9).

SOLUTIONS START WITH DRAINAGE

It is usually a good idea to start the investigation by examining the track drainage since

drainage is often a factor causing chronic problems. Achieving proper drainage is not

simply a matter of digging a cross trench and letting water out of the track. If not used

properly, these trenches become longitudinal discontinuities that can cause roughness
increase. They can also allow water to reach further in to the subgrade soil causing more

softening. Furthermore if the trench is filled with ballast, subgrade attrition may occur,

thus creating a new problem.

Drainage is a complex problem (2). Factors to consider include: ballast fouling

condition, subballast gradation, slope of subgrade surface, ditch or pipe depth ditch or

pipe longitudinal slope and expected rainfall characteristics. Remember too that water

drains by gravity and so can only flow to outlets at a lower elevation. Also clay soils will

not drain because of their low permeability.

It would be desirable to have the subballast shed the water draining down from

the ballast to keep the water from the subgrade, but the subballast must also be permeable

enough to drain water which gets in to it. These are contradictory requirements which

can not be met with a single subballast layer.

Drainage of railway tracks is essential to acceptable track performance. Water in

the track substructure originates from three potential sources: 1) precipitation onto the

track, 2) surface flow from areas adjacent to the track, and 3) groundwater flow. A

complete drainage system must include provisions for handling water from all three

sources (2).

Precipitation onto the track will enter the ballast. It will then flow laterally out of

the ballast into ditches or enter the subballast. This water will either drain laterally out of

the subballast or continue downward into the subgrade. Surface ditch drains can collect

water from the ballast and subballast. Subsurface drains are needed to collect water

flowing through the subgrade and may also be needed to help drain the subballast.
 Particularly difficult is drainage of water between adjacent tracks or from tracks

surrounded on both sides by other tracks. Not only is the drainage path to the side longer,

but a suitable drainage path is more difficult to maintain. Cross-drains under the outer

tracks or longitudinal drains between tracks may be needed.

Ballast can become saturated from rainfall by a high degree of fouling, which

holds water, or by restricted drainage at the edge of the ballast. Causes of this restricted

drainage include, for example:

• Ballast pocket formation from subgrade settlement

• Fouled ballast shoulder

• Low permeability boundary at edge of ballast

• Ponding of water next to the track from lack of a ditch to carry water away from the

track after exiting the ballast

• Inadequate lateral slope on the subballast surface to direct water to the side of the

track.

The ability of water to drain laterally also requires that the drainage path at the edge of

the ballast and subballast layers not be blocked (2). Two conditions need to be met to

achieve this requirement: 1) the ballast shoulder and the edge of the subballast must be

free draining, and 2) discharged water must be able to flow away from the track that the

toe of the ballast slope is the most critical zone for achieving drainage of water out of the

ballast.

CONCLUSIONS

Clearly there are a lot of remedial techniques for subgrade problems to draw upon. An

investigation is necessary to select the correct solution for each specific case. In most
cases, it is not until the underlying cause of a problem is known can a lasting and

economical solution be found. The subject is complex, but information is available to

help.

Ballast is an important part of track maintenance. It is also a re-occurring part,

and so is designed to be maintained. Furthermore, ballast is the only part of the

substructure which is easily maintained. To keep costs and disruption to traffic low,

ballast maintenance should be minimized.

Ballast properties change over time in track and the ballast becomes increasingly

fouled. The causes of fouling need to be understood in order to reduce the rate of ballast

performance deterioration. Undercutting/cleaning is needed to restore the desired ballast

properties after becoming fouled. However, undercutting/cleaning will not be cost-

effective unless track drainage is functioning properly as well. Shoulder cleaning can

lengthen the time until undercutting/cleaning is needed.

Tamping is needed for geometry corrections. However, tamping should only be

done when and where it is needed to minimize ballast damage and temporary reductions

in track stability.

Ballast and subballast contribute to protection of subgrade from overstressing.

However, subballast, which is always needed, is preferred for completing the total

granular layer thickness beyond the minimum ballast layer thickness required for

fulfilling the other ballast functions.

No factor is more important to track performance than drainage, yet drainage is

often inadequate or neglected.

 When unstable subgrade conditions exist, the cost of maintaining track geometry

will be much higher than normal. A number of effective remedial solutions are available.

Even though the cost of these repair methods is often high, low cost solutions may be

ineffective and even detrimental and so may not be cost effective.

Track substructure technology is complex. Its importance both requires and

deserves education programs.

References for More Information

1. Selig, E.T. and Waters, J.M., Track Geotechnology and Substructure

Management, Thomas Telford, Ltd., London, 1994.

2. Heyns, Francois J., “Railway Track Drainage Design Techniques”, Ph.D.

Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of

Massachusetts, May 2000.

3. Selig, E.T., “Ballast’s part: It’s Key Roles and Qualities,” Railway Track and

Structures, March 1998, Vol. 94, No. 3, pp 21-.

4. Selig, E.T., “Ballast Performance: Considering more key factors,” Railway Track

and Structures, July 1998, pp 17-20, 36.

5. Li, D. and Selig, E.T., “Method for Railroad Track Foundation Design. I:

Development,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,

ASCE, April 1998, Vol. 124, No. 4, pp 323-329.

6. Li., D., and Selig, E.T., “Method for Railroad Track Foundation Design. II:

Applications,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,

ASCE, Vol. 124, No. 4, April 1998 pp 316-322.

7. Selig, E.T., “Characteristics of Ballast Shoulder Cleaning and Ditching,”

Proceedings, 6th International Heavy Haul Railway Conference, Cape Town,

South Africa, April 1997, pp 931-944.

8. Sussmann, T.R., and Selig, E.T., “Lime Stabilization of Railway Track

Subgrade,” Proceedings, 6th International Heavy Haul Railway Conference, Cape

Town, South Africa, April, 1997, pp. 98-112.

9. Selig, E.T., “Substructure Maintenance Management,” Proceedings, 6th

International Heavy Haul Railway Conference, Cape Town, South Africa, April

1997, pp. 796-809.