Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
59 views2 pages

Example: (Last Name, Initial of First Name)

Group leaders are instructed to honestly evaluate their Type A group mates based on their performance creating a short film on depression. The evaluation should rate members on a scale of 0 to 5 in the areas of participation, leadership, listening, feedback, cooperation, and time management. Written explanations are required for any member receiving a score of 0.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
59 views2 pages

Example: (Last Name, Initial of First Name)

Group leaders are instructed to honestly evaluate their Type A group mates based on their performance creating a short film on depression. The evaluation should rate members on a scale of 0 to 5 in the areas of participation, leadership, listening, feedback, cooperation, and time management. Written explanations are required for any member receiving a score of 0.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

PEER EVALUATION GUIDELINES

INSTRUCTION: Group leader should rate/evaluate his/her type A group mates as HONEST as he/she could
be. He/She should base it on their performance during the creation of their major performance task: short-film
on depression. Use the back portion of this paper for your evaluation.

5 4 3 1 0
Participation Group member Group member Group member Group member did not No
participated fully participated most participated but wasted participate, show
and of the time time wasted time, or worked
was always on task and was on task regularly and/ or was on
in class. most of the time. rarely on task. unrelated material.

Leadership Group member Group member Group member usually Group member did not No
assumed leadership sometimes allowed others to assume leadership or show
in an appropriate assumed assume leadership or assumed it in a non-
way when leadership in an often dominated the productive manner.
necessary by appropriate way. group.
helping the group
stay on track,
encouraging group
participation,
posing solutions to
problems, and
having a positive
attitude.
Listening Group member Group member Group member Group member did not No
listened carefully usually listened to sometimes did not listen to others and often show
to others’ ideas. others’ ideas. listen to others’ ideas. interrupted them.
Feedback Group member Group member Group member Group member did not No
offered detailed, offered occasionally offered offer constructive or show
constructive constructive constructive feedback, useful feedback.
feedback when feedback when but sometimes the
appropriate. appropriate. comments were
inappropriate or not
useful.
Cooperation Group member Group member Group member Group member often No
treated others usually treated sometimes treated treated others show
respectfully and others respectfully others disrespectfully disrespectfully and/or
shared the work and shared the and/or did not share the did not share the work
load fairly. work load fairly. work load fairly. load fairly.
Time Group member Group member Group member often Group member did not No
Management completed assigned usually completed did not complete complete most of the show
tasks on time. assigned tasks on assigned tasks on time, assigned tasks on time
time and did not and often held up and often forced the
hold up progress completion of the group to make last-
on the newspaper newspaper. minute adjustments and
because of changes to accommodate
incomplete work. missing work.

Example: (Last name, Initial of first name)

Total
Time
Group Member Participation Leadership Listening Feedback Cooperation Score
Management
Silvestre, S. 4 5 4 3 4 2 22
Dela Cruz, Juan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Note: Attach at least 2-3 sentences to serve as a written explanation as to why the person got (0) zero.

Section: _________________________ Type A group: ___________


Name of Evaluator: __________________________________________________________________

Total
Time
Group Member Participation Leadership Listening Feedback Cooperation Score
Management

You might also like