Papers in Japanese Linguistics 1: Vol.2 Si
Papers in Japanese Linguistics 1: Vol.2 Si
As far as 1 can tell, no attempt has ever been made toward achieving a
comprehensive description of Japanese ordinal expressions. Tet the diversi-
ty of ordinal forms and of situations in which one fora is appropriate to
the exclusion of others insures that anything less than a systematic integra-
tion leaves too many facts unrelated or unexplained. This diversity is seen
on the formal level in the existence of two ordinal affixes, dai- and -me.
and in the use of different classes of words to denote the members of ordinal
sequences. Underlying the interaction of these forms is a sense that differ-
entiates several types of sequences. But varied as the forms and their se-
mantic factors are, they can still be related to one another as aspects of a
coherent system; and that is what 1 have set out to do in this article.
Since ordinals are derived from cardinal number forms, we may expect
that the diversity of elements in the ordinal system springs from a similar
condition of the cardinal system. This is true; and consequently reference
to the basic features of the cardinal system (not merely to cardinal numbers
as isolated forms) is necessary to a description of ordinal expressions. In
an earlier article (Backus 1972) I detailed my conception of the cardinal
number system, A recapitulation of the main line of reasoning in that article
should provide an adequate basis for describing the ordinal system.
The major mode of counting in Japanese enumerates attributive units in
reference to things that are conceived of as independent and self-contained.
The form is a numeral compound in construction with a referent. "Hie numeral
compound consists of a number and a numeral adjunct. The adjunct specifies
the attributive unit while the number enumerates it; and the compound bears
toward its referent either a quantitative reference, as in gosatu no hon
'five books' (lit. 'five bound volumes C-satu] in reference to the entity
"book"'), or a constitutive reference, as in gosyoo no hon 'a book of five
chapters' (syoo 'chapter'). Numeral adjuncts are derived from two form
classess bound forms, which I call numeral suffixes, and free forms, which
I call count nouns. Count nouns denote attributive entities and appear in
number expressions usually in the adjunct position, where the things they de-
note are directly enumerated. They constitute a subclass of the noun; and
in contrast to them I designate other nouns loosely as class nouns, because
they always occupy the referent position in number expressions, and in a
quantitative reference with numeral compounds, the things they denote are
classified at the same time as they are quantified. Rie mode just described
I call the compound-referent mode. It is accompanied by a minor mode con-
sisting of a number modifying a class noun (e.g. gohei 'five soldiers',
gozyuu no hei 'fifty soldiers'), which I call the number-referent mode.
Like the cardinal number system, the system of ordinals can produce no
form which is universally applicable. Although the various forms share the
single function of indicating position in a sequence, each is restricted by
semantic conditions to a local range of usage, which does not, however, pre-
vent the ranges from overlapping and thereby bringing the forms into connota-
tive contrast with one another. On the formal level the system appears quite
complicated, and a description that proceeds from form to meaning moves lat-
erally and depends for consistency on constant referrings back and repeti-
tions of material for comparison. A description that starts from messing,
however, while not wholly free from these shortcomings, has the advantage c-'
Brought to you by | provisional account
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 1/5/20 3:31 PM
2
Quantitative Sequences
The form associated with quantitative sequences consists of a -me ordi-
nal modifying by means of the particle no a class noun or a noun that denotes
a container. Class nouns denote things that are considered to be independ-
ent and self-contained. Container words, on the other hand, I treat as count
nouns, for they denote containers either as measures or as objects; but in
the second sense they are to be grouped with class nouns as far as their be-
havior in ordinal expressions is concerned. These nouns indicate the content
of the sequence. A -me ordinal is a numeral compound (number + numeral ad-
junct) bearing the ordinal suffix -me. The adjunct specifies units that par-
ticularize the content of the sequence, and the number and ordinal suffix to-
gether designate the position of one of these units within the sequence.
Concerning the function of the numeral adjunct as a form that particularizes
the content of the sequence, this is seen most clearly when the adjunct is
denotatively essential to the utterance, as in gohakome no ringo 'the fifth
box of apples'. Here 'apple' (ringo) makes up the content of the sequence,
but it is only when the unit 'box' (hako) is referred to the content that the
members of the sequence—boxes of a p p l e s — a r e revealed. A literal transla-
tion of gohakome no ringo would run 'the fifth boxful in reference to the
entity "apple."' When the adjunct has only a connotative value, as in the
case of - n i n 'human being', the noun it refers to (its referent) will be spe-
cific enough to indicate both the content and members, and the adjunct be-
comes redundant. Goninme no gakusei 'the fifth student' is literally the
fifth human being in reference to the entity "student."'
Numeral adjuncts in quantitative sequences specify four kinds of units.
These are exemplified below, where the adjuncts represented as bound forms
are numeral suffixes and those represented as free forms are count nouns.
container units
gohaime no koohii 'the fifth cup of coffee' (-hai 'cup')
gobinme no kusuri 'the fifth bottle of medicine' (bin 'bottle')
partitive units
gohukume no kusuri 'the fifth dose of medicine' (-huku 'dose')
gokabume no kiku 'the fifth stock of chrysanthemums' (kabu 'stock')
collective units
gotuime no sensu 'the fifth pair of fans' (-tui 'pair')
gokumime no tebukuro 'the fifth pair of gloves' (kumi 'set')
generic units
itutuae no hako 'the fifth box' (-tu: ^nondescript objects)
gohoSme no bin 'the fifth bottle' T-hon: long objects)
gosatume no ho5 'the fifth book' (-satu; bound volumes)
godaiae no kurana 'the fifth car' (-dai: vehicles)
Generic units refer things to categories, and the adjuncts that repre-
sent the« may therefore be called classifiers. Classifiers have an impor-
tant function in the cardinal number system, where their descriptive value
enhances the individuality of the referent. A large body of seldom used pro-
fessional or literary classifiers is available to furnish highly connotative
substitutes for a smaller number of classifiers whose meanings have become
attenuated through habitual use. Interplay between these two groups of clas-
sifiers lends a certain expressiveness to diction. In ordinals belonging to
quantitative sequences, however, the connotative resources of the less used
classifiers are not utilized, and the formation of -me ordinals is restrict-
ed to numeral compounds that contain the habitually used classifiers. All of
these turn out to be numeral suffixes; in addition to the ones already il-
lustrated are the following: -do for counting recurrences of a phenomenon,
-hiki for animals, -ban for traditional entertainments, -hatu for discharges
of weapons, -ken for houses, -mai for flat objects, and -BOO for watercraft.
Other classifiers are unlikely to be found in -me ordinals. Doubtless this
restriction on the occurrence of classifiers with -me has to do with the fact
that -me in some contexts is an informal counterpart of the ordinal prefix
dai-. Many of the less used classifiers have the same connotation of formal-
ity as dai-; quantitative sequences, being casual, are also informal, and
neither the ordinal prefix dai- nor the less used classifiers appear in them.
The presence of a classifier in a -me ordinal results in a form that
qualifies a member of a sequence at the same time as it designates its posi-
tion. But evidently this qualification, which enhances the individuality of
things in the process of counting them, is often felt to be inconsistent with
the idea of arrangement in ordinal expressions; for the classifier may be
replaced, and very often is replaced, by a suffix having the abstract meaning
of 'place in a sequence'. This suffix is -ban;1 and the -me ordinals built
on it represent a specialized development of the form, whereby the particular
meanings of the different classifiers that distinguish and restrict one -me
ordinal in relation to another are all subsumed in the abstract meaning of
-ban. To separate this specialized -me ordinal from the others, I use the
term '-banme ordinals'. In quantitative sequences a -banme ordinal may sub-
stitute for any -me ordinal built on a classifier, and in fact, -banme ordi-
nals are preferred. Thus goninme no gakusei becomes gobanme no gakusei 'the
fifth student', which is literally 'the fifth place in sequence in reference
to the entity "student."' Similarly, for the examples given under 'generic_
units' above, we get the corresponding forms gobanme no hako, gobanme no bin,
gobanme no hon, and so forth.^
Finally, it should be noted that ordinal forms are nouns, so that gonin-
me, gobanme, etc. are to be translated as 'the fifth one', just as a form
like gohakome is translated 'the fifth boxful'.
Constitutive Sequences
In constitutive sequences the ordinal affixes -me and dai- come into
contrast, giving two types of forms. The -me type is represented by the same
two ordinal forms that occur in quantitative sequences. In constitutive se-
Brought to you by | provisional account
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 1/5/20 3:31 PM
h
quences, however, the adjunct in the -me ordinal denotes a member of a sys-
tem , and the ordinal is a noun specifying a member of a system occupying a
given place in a sequence. The system, if stated, is indicated by a noun
that modifies the ordinal: kciyakuayo no gokoomokume 'the fifth item in the
contract'. The sequences exemplified below are closed sequences belonging to
systems; their members are denoted by either numeral suffixes or count nouns.
-haku 'beat'
gohakume 'the fifth beat' of a rhythmic system
dankai 'stage'
godankaime 'the fifth stage' of a process
kaikyuu 'rank'
gokaikyuume 'the fifth rank' of a hierarchy
gakka 'lesson'
gogakkame 'the fifth lesson' in a textbook
heya 'room'
goheyame 'the fifth room' in the corridor of a building
kumi 'group'
gokumime 'the fifth group' in an organization of people
A few adjuncts denote units that fit both quantitative and constitutive
sequences
gobanae no koonoku 'the fifth item' gobanae no kaikyuu 'the fifth rank'
gobanae no dankai 'the fifth stage' go^*n"e no heya 'the fifth rooa'
If the count noun denotes a unit of the kind that fits both quantitative
and constitutive sequences, -banae restricts its aeaning to constitutive.
Many class nouns denote things that belong to larger wholes or things
that, when conceived in sequence, becoae interdependent. In such cases the
sequence is constitutive, and -ae ordinals formed on classifiers are inappro-
priate. As an exaaple of a thing that belongs to a larger whole, consider
the following:
In constitutive sequences -me and -banae ordinals come into contrast with
Brought to you by | provisional account
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 1/5/20 3:31 PM
6
dai- ordinals. Dai- is a Chinese ordinal prefix, which, like most loanwords
from Classical Chinese, acquired an academic flavor through the use of Chin-
ese as the written language of Japanese scholars. The academic origin of
dai- has resulted in its possessing a distinctive connotation of formality
and deliberateness. Accordingly, a dai- ordinal designates formally position
in a sequence, implying a deliberateness of arrangement that precludes the
possibility of the sequence being fortuitous. That is why dai- ordinals occur
only in constitutive sequences. The ordinal suffix -me, on the other hand,
has no intrinsic connotation, which is why -me and -banme ordinals occur in
both types of sequence; but by contrast with dai-, -me acquires a connotation
of informality and casualness. Although this difference between the two or-
dinal affixes seldom comes through in English translation, it is striking
whenever it can be reflected, as in the case of syoo 'chapter', where daigo-
syoo is 'Chapter V' while gosyoome is 'the fifth chapter'.
Dai- ordinals are formed by prefixing dai- to the Chinese-derived numer-
als—but with one exception, that dai- is regularly prefixed to the native
numeral yon, yo- 'four', whose Chinese equivalent, si, is obsolescent. The
resultant form is a noun that designates position in a sequence: daigo 'the
fifth one'. Dai- ordinals combine with both numeral adjuncts and class nouns
in forms that under certain conditions exhibit assimilation at the juncture;^
and like the -banme ordinals, they may also be set off from nouns by the par-
ticle no. As to the occurrence of no, the particle is obligatory only when
two or more ordinals precede the noun or when the ordinal itself is modified
by a preceding word.
and Include literary classifiers such as -hen 'written work' for counting
written works, -ayu 'head' for counting Japanese poena, ku 'verse' for haiku
and senryuu verses, and kyoku 'musical piece' for songs; in fact, any monomi-
al classifier except the commonly used ones mentioned in connection with -me
ordinals belongs to this group that take dai- ordinals only. In addition are
monomial count nouns that denote units in formally established systems of
classification and organization, such as bu 'division', rui 'class', kyoku
'bureau', bu 'department', and ku 'district'. Moreover, these count nouns,
including the ones listed above as classifiers, are apparently never set apart
from the ordinal by the particle no.
The following examples of numeral adjuncts with dai- ordinals correspond
in part to the list given earlier for -me ordinals. Although two of these ad-
juncts, -gyoo 'line' and kumi 'group', appear also in quantitative sequences,
the presence of dai- restricts them here to a constitutive sequence.
Dai- ordinals occur with class nouns whose meanings are appropriate to a
constitutive sequence, and serve in this environment as formal counterparts of
-banme ordinals.
responds to the native word tera 'Buddhist monastery', 'temple'; or they may
be the substantive morpheme abstracted from a binome or trinome, such as -sen
'line' from boogyoosen 'defense line'. In the academic style of writing, dai-
ordinals form compounds with quasi nouns in a constitutive sequence.
owari kara go banme no ronbun 'the fifth article from the end'
It goes without saying that sequences with a stated base point may also be
quantitative, in which case -me ordinals formed on classifiers appear in them:
hidari kara goninme (or gobaflae) no gakusei 'the fifth student from the left'.
Time Sequences
Time units are represented by bound forms, class nouns, and count nouns
as follows:
da
zikken no ^g°nen . 'the fifth year of the experiment'
gobanme no tosi
daisanyoobi
syuu no daisanniti 'the third day of the week*
aanbanme no hi
kaigi no ato yokkame ni 'on the fourth day after the conference'
zikken no hazime kara gonenme 'the fifth year after the beginning of the ex-
periment •
ryokoo ni dekakete kara nisyuume 'the second week after starting on the trip'
tosi no hazime kara rokkagetume 'the sixth month from the beginning of the
year'
syuu no hazime kara mikkame 'the third day from the beginning of the week'
tuki no hazime kara isayuume 'the first week from the beginning of the month'
daininiti no ban
kaigi no hutukame no bain 'the second evening of the conference'
nibagme no ball
The presence of hutukaae 'the second day' constitutes a deviation from the
rule for fortaal tiae units that -me ordinals are confined to dependent se-
quences. But the ordinal here has a different function; it does not refer
priaarily to dags but instead is mediating to put evenings into sequence,
much like a -banae ordinal: 'the second-day evening' or 'the evening of the
second day'. On the other hand, hutabanae 'the second evening', as an ordinal
built directly on ban, follows the rule for tiae units generally and occurs
only in dependent sequences* It should be noted, moreover, that the meaning
of hutukaae no ban differs slightly from that of nibanae no ban. In both
kaigi no hutukaae no ban and kaigi no daininiti no ban it is the evening of
the second day of the conference, whereas in kaigi no nibanae no ban it is
the second evening of the conference. A party for the conferees that took
place on the foraer would be one party held on the second day, while kaigi no
nibanae no ban no paatii implies the second of two parties.
In dependent sequences natural tiae units are ordered by -me ordinals
only. In the case of ban the ordinal may be formed directly on the count noun
kare ga dekakete kara hutukame no ban 'the evening of the second day after he
left*
The other natural units sire ordered according to the second form.
kare ga dekakete kara hutukaae no asa 'the second morning after he left'
Appellative Sequences
In an appellative sequence the ordinal serves as a formal designation of
some thing or place, functioning as a distinctive name based on position in a
sequence rather than as an indicator of position p«r se. The form is a dai-
ordinal preceding a noun without no. The absence of no in this case is but
an instance of a general rule that call« for its omission in proper names.
Compare Tookyoo Daigaku 'Tokyo University' with Tookyoo no daigaku 'a univer-
sity in Tokyo'.
daisan sekai 'the thi*~- world' daiyonzyuu roku kokkai 'the *f6th Diet'
quasi-Appellative Sequences
These are so called because the group includes not only clearly appella-
tive sequences but others that may be interpreted as such and still others
that probably cannot be considered appellative. The distinction, however, is
not so important as the fact that all of them are absolute sequences. More-
over, they share the same form; and it is difficult to imagine how the ap-
parently nonappellative sequences could have been established without the ap-
pellative ones in mind.
Divisions of an organization may be designated formally by dai- ordinals,
as daiiti kumi 'the first group' or dainibu 'the second department'. Once
these names are recognized, they Bay be abbreviated by dropping the dai- :
'page fire' in a book (note also owari kara gopeezime 'the fifth page from the
end'); but if the pages are torn out, the fifth one is goaaime (or gobanme)
no peezi, a member of a quantitative sequence.
The following time units compose quasi-appellative sequences in chrono-
logies: -niti, -ka, -kka 'day', -nen 'year', nendo 'fiscal year', and seiki
•century'. Hutuka is the second day of the month as well as 'two days'; but
the first day is rendered by a nonnumerical form, tuitati 'commencement of
the moon'. Ninen is the second year of a chronology—A.D. or B.C., or else
of a calendrical era as in Syoowa ninen 'the second year of Showa'; it is
also 'two years'. The first year moving forward from the base point of a
chronology is called gannen 'base year'; but moving backwards, it is itinen
as in kigenzen itinen '1 B.C.'. -Nen also denotes units of a student's formal
education: daigaku no itinen 'the first year of college'. Nendo (lit. 'year-
measure') denotes a twelve-month period starting from other than January. If
the first fiscal year refers to the first year of activity of an institution,
it is called syonendo 'initial year-measure'; if it refers to the first year
of_a calendrical era, it is called gannendo 'base year-measure', as in Syoowa
gannendo 'fiscal 1926'. Ninendo is 'the second fiscal year' or 'two fiscal
years'. Isseiki is 'one century' or 'the first century' as a unit in the
Western chronology. Dai- and -me do not occur with these adjuncts when the
units pertain to chronologies.
Related to the foregoing are gakki 'school term' and gakunen 'school
year'. These denote formal units of the educational structure, and as such,
may occur with dai-; but -me is probably never used with them. However,
gakunen also denotes a year in a student's educational chronology (like -nen
above), and in this meaning takes neither ordinal affix: sangakunen made de
daigaku o yameru 'to quit the university after getting as far as the third
year'. Itigakki is 'the first term* or 'one term', itigakunen 'the first
school year' or 'one school year'.
There are three adjuncts that denote place in a succession (-kai 're-
currence', -zi 'order', and dai 'stage'), each of which behaves in a way pe-
culiar to itself. -K»i occurs in compounds that enumerate recurrences of a
phenomenon, as in sankai no kaigi 'three conferences', implying that they are
three recurrences of the same event, either with the same conferees or on the
same subject. (Cf. mittu no kaigi, three totally unrelated conferences.)
The third conference is saflkaime no kaigi or daisankai no kaigi. The second
ordinal becomes appellative by dropping the no (daisaflkai kaigi), and this
may be abbreviated to sankai kaigi 'the third conference'. -Kai is also used
to designate divisions of certain sports contests: (dai-) saSkai no ura 'the
second half of the third inning'. Note also syokai 'initial recurrence':
syokai no taimen 'the first interview'.
-Zi denotes order in a temporal succession and in a consequential suc-
cession. When it refers to a temporal succession, it functions as a formal
synonym of -kai: sanzi no kasai 'three successive conflagrations', daisaSzi
no kasai 'the third conflagration'. The compounds do not occur with -me.
The dai- ordinals become appellative by dropping no: dainizi Konoe naikaku
'the second Konoe Cabinet', daiitizi sekai taisen 'the First World War'. But
in temporal successions these appellative forms are not abbreviated. However,
when the adjunct refers to a consequential succession, the compounds never
enumerate and are to be taken as abbreviations of dai- ordinals: (dai-) nizi
kyooiku 'secondary education', (dai-) sanzi seisan 'tertiary production'.
Dai denotes a stage in a temporal succession of human beings. The com-
pounds frequently take -me, rarely dai-. The first stage is syodai 'initial
stage'. The compounds quantify human beings by stages in natural descent as
Brought to you by | provisional account
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 1/5/20 3:31 PM
lit
nikyuukan 'an official of the second grade'. -Kyuu also denotes school grades
(gakkyuuT, but here the compounds are restricted to the adverbial position,
where they always enumerate: nikyuu aita da 'to be two grades lower'. Final-
ly, -kyuu denotes grades of accomplishment in the traditional arts. The -kyuu
grades belong to the junior section and make a pair with the -dan grades of
the senior section. Syokyuu is the highest junior grade, nikyuu the second
highest, and so on. The next grade above syokyuu is syodan, which is the low-
est grade in the senior section; thence nidan, etc. Examples: zyuudoo de
sankyuu da 'to be at the junior third grade in judo', nikyuu agaru 'to go up
two grades'; nidan no kikaku 'a chess player of the senior second grade',
itidan ue da *to be one grade higher'.
The remaining adjuncts produce compounds that are purely ordinal. They
do not occur with -me. Two of them, -too 'class' and -ryuu 'rate', express
evaluation. Infrequently dai- is prefixed to the compounds formed on these
two. -Too is used to evaluate a wide variety of things, and the compounds
combine with bound monomes or precede free forms without the particle no:
ittoohin 'first-class goods', nitoosyoo 'second prize', santoo untin 'third-
class fare', kyoosoo de ittoo ni naru 'to take first place in a race*. Coo-
pounds formed on -ryuu express a subjective or impressionistic evaluation
that seldom goes lower than sanryuu 'third-rate': itirymi (no) daigaku 'a
first-rate university*.
Compounds formed on -goo 'number' combine with bound monomes or precede
free forms usually without no to form appellative sequences: zyuugoo (no)
heya 'room no. ten', nizyuugoositu 'room no. twenty', itigoosya 'car no. one'
(of a train). -Ban in this sense has a wider application than -goo. Further,
if members of a sequence are themselves composed of consecutive members, -ban
numbers the principal members and -goo the subordinate members. For example,
trains are numbered by -ban and the cars making them up by -goo.
-Sei denotes a generation in natural descent and also in a succession of
occupants of an office or position which they hold for life. The compounds
are used most frequently to designate ®> member of a dynasty outside the Chin-
ese culture area who bears the same name as a predecessor or successor. In
this usage they folio* the name, reflecting Western word order: Waporeon
issei 'Napoleon I'» Zyon D. Rokkuferaa sansei 'John D. Rockefeller III'. Over-
lapping -dJil compounds, compounds formed on -sei precede artists' hereditary
names *nd the names of offices held for life: zyuu gosei Itimura Pzaemon
'the fifteenth Ichimura Uzaemon', (dai-) zyuu hassei TeHdai Zasu 'the eight-
eenth Tendai Abbot'. They are also used in statements of nationality: Ame-
rikazin no sansei 'a third-generation American'.
Compounds formed on -tyaku 'arrival' designate the order in which con-
testants finish a race: (dai-) ittyaku no soosya 'the first runner in'.
The remaining adjuncts produce numeral compounds that never occur with
the ordinal affixes: -men 'page' for designating pages of a newspaper (iti-
men 'the first page'); -gatu 'month' for designating the months of the year
Titigatu • the first month' s January); and -zi 'hour' for designating the
hours of the day (itizi 'one o'clock').
guess as to how the major components of the ordinal system were assembled.
From the beginning the Japanese have quantified things by counting other
things in an attributive relation to them. The native ordinal affix is -me,
and this must have been suffixed to the form modified by the number, i.e.
the form denoting the attributive entity, as it is today. The result is a
quantitative sequence. The concept of attributive entities would seem to
lead naturally to recognition of a class of things that characteristically
appear as constituents. However that may be, recognition of constituent
things developed under Chinese influence as the intellectual level of culture
expanded with an inflow of continental literature and scholarship. This
historical fact is reflected in the Chinese provenance of most of the words
that denote constituent things. With these loanwords came the ordinal prefix
dai-. There seems to be no compelling reason why dai- should have been re-
stricted to absolute sequences, since it is not so restricted in Chinese; but
absolute sequences are typical of scholarship, and dai- has always been an
academic form in the Japanese lexicon. In any case, the existence of a re-
stricted dai- sequence makes it easier to understand the ordinal system by
distinguishing a category of constitutive sequences in which dai- contrasts
with -me. Constitutive sequences are made up of constituent things. Although
this type of sequence is imperfectly distinguished inasmuch as -me occurs in
it, it is reasonable to suppose that the «Japanese are intuitively aware of it
as something different from a quantitative sequence. For one thing, in car-
dinal number expressions they treat constituent things differently from self-
contained things by counting them with the noun in the adjunct position, show-
ing that they are attributive. And in ordinal expressions, too, they modify
nouns denoting constituent things with -banme ordinals (-ban also comes from
Chinese), which suppresses any sense of their particularity; -me ordinals
formed on classifiers, which particularize their referents, are confined to
quantitative sequences.
Once these three types of sequence—quantitative, constitutive, and ab-
solute—are perceived under the complex interplay of -me, -banme, and dai-,
the categories of dependent and appellative sequences readily take shape to
explain the remaining mysteries of ordinal behavior. Further development of
the system consists only in adding vocabulary in the form of numeral adjuncts.
Most of this vocabulary is Chinese. It appears in various stages of natural-
ization, some forms being wholly bound, others partially bound, and others
free; and it gives rise to fine distinctions of meaning as well as duplica-
tion of function, which often seem unnecessary to the practical working of an
ordinal system. This formal diversity is due to a merging of two languages
throughout all aspects of the expression of number, including even the numer-
als; and while it might cause us to ponder anew the Japanese patience with
redundancy, so often manifested in a proneness to borrow without discarding,
we would do well to assume, as the case of ordinal expressions demonstrates,
that each instance is somewhere governed by a set of related and unifying
concepts.
Notes
prehensive -me ordinal probably aterns fron this meaning. There is also a use
of -ban as a classifier for counting performances of traditional entertainments
such as games of chess, bouts of judo or wrestling, and performances of plays
and dances. In this usage it acquires the meaning of 'a turn at performing',
which I consider to be separate from its meaning in ordinal expressions.
^For example, itutume no heya for 'the fifth room' was characterized by
one native speaker as childish.
k
Assimilation in numerical forms is a matter tangential to my concern
in writing this article and the one preceding it (Backus 1972); but its es-
sential features are described in notes 10 and 16 of the latter. With numer-
al suffixes and monomial nouns (a monome being a Chinese loanword represented
by a single graph), assimilation for dai- ordinals takes place following the
patterns described in those notes. With other kinds of nouns (binomes, native
words, and Western loanwords) there is no assimilation. The absence of assi-
milation in the second case constitutes a deviation from the pattern for car-
dinal number forms in that assimilated number-noun forms become unassimilated
when dai- is added. For example, the number-class noun rokkatei 'six house-
holds' becomes dairoku katei, and the number-count noun issyurui 'one kind'
becomes daiiti syurui.
5
The term 'class noun' cannot be applied to time units unless its defi-
nition is broadened to include nouns that are never placed in construction
with numbers or numeral compounds. Hi, tuki, and tost are three such nouns;
there must be many more. Actually the point of differentiating the nouns is
to isolate the count nouns from all the rest, and the important feature of a
count noun is that it occupies the adjunct position without undergoing a
change in its meaning. That some count nouns aire occasionally found as re-
ferents of numeral compounds while others never appear in that position is a
difference that for the time being I consider to be secondary, and I have not
taken the trouble to test the count nouns for their behavior in this respect.
Still, certain groups of count nouns are readily distinguished as incapable
of occupying the referent position, one of which is the group of nouns that
denote standard measures. To these must now be added the time units repre-
sented by count nouns; they appear in cardinal number expressions only as ad-
juncts within numeral compounds.
References