The TQM method not only involves obtaining high quality in education, but also
affects all parts of the educational process: organization, management, interpersonal
relationships, material and human resources, etc. Tqm may lead to continuous
improvement of teaching quality to encourage students to become critical and
creative thinkers in the rapidly changing world of technology with TQM opportunities
for personal and professional growth, along with the pride and joy that come with
getting better and better every day, and helping others to do the same.In the TQM
organization, everyone is a customer and supplier. The role of a person in these two
abilities must be determined to better understand the systematic nature of the work
in which everyone is involved. In terms of education, we are particularly prone to
personal and departmental segregation. "When I close the classroom door, those
children are mine!" The concept is too narrow to survive in a world where teamwork
and collaboration bring high-quality benefits to most people. In the classroom, the
team of teachers and students is equivalent to the frontline workers in the industry.
The product of their successful cooperation is the development of students' ability,
interest and character. In a sense, students are clients of teachers and recipients of
educational services for the growth and progress of students. From this perspective,
teachers and schools are effective learning tools, environment and system providers
for students, and students are the school's main customers. I have discovered about
myself, about the topic total quality management is that the road to total quality in
any "learning organization" is not smooth. Any magic plan applied externally cannot
ensure an efficient or painless process. External experts can show you models,
teach you useful tools and provide encouragement, but they can’t and shouldn’t do
retrofit work for you. "Longing for learning" ultimately comes from within the
individual and within the organization.
The core of TQM is to show the best quality in our own work, others and the work
we have done together. In many ways, this naturally meets the hopes and ambitions
of education leaders to improve school and community work.Comprehensive quality
management is something that everyone wants very much but that is very hard to
get or achieve. In "total quality" schools, administrators collaborate with their
customers (teacher). Today, our greatest interest is to encourage everyone’s
potential by working to continuously improve the capabilities of ourselves and the
people who work and live with us. Fundamentally speaking, total quality is a win-win
concept, which is effective for everyone's ultimate advantage.
Currently, higher education is shifting to a market-oriented environment where
customer satisfaction is critical. Philosophies such as Total Quality Management
(TQM) have been successfully adopted by business organizations and are generally
considered the way forward. This article reports the results of a survey aimed at
investigating different perspectives on applying industrial quality management
principles to higher education. The interpretation of basic terms (such as quality,
measurement and customer) and the applicability of TQM, quality standards and the
application of quality in higher education are the main issues that are being
questioned. The results show that although the basic principles have been generally
accepted in the new environment due to the complexity and dynamics of education,
there are still reservations about the way of operation. It give us benefits in aligning
quality management with organizational change, and to describe the circumstances
under which such consistency can be achieved. Design-This article starts with the
similarities between the difficulties associated with organizational change and the
difficulties found when implementing a quality management system in higher
education. From this preliminary analysis, the characteristics of the quality
management system that contribute to organizational change are highlighted. A
case study is presented, which includes several (but not all) features that support
organizational change, and the lessons learned from implementing this quality
management system are used to draw conclusions. The survey results found that a
quality management system that accepts variability and diversity is more suitable for
creating the necessary conditions for organizational change. It has also been found
that, in the context of higher education institutions, promoting academic success is a
good choice to unify shared beliefs at the organizational level, and because it is
easier to change with the support of shared beliefs, the quality management system
will benefit from the centralization of academic core goal of success. Practical
significance-Because knowledge is local and regional in the first place, reporting on
local experience helps to better understand the challenges faced by those who wish
to implement an effective quality management system in higher education
institutions. Teachers take initiative to learn and keep abreast of the latest
developments, to innovate, continuously seek improvement in their work and strive
for individual and institutional excellence Teacher quality has a direct relation to
learning outcome to the extent that it is a major determinant of the overall quality
index of the institution.
The quality of teachers affects the development, implementation and modification of
courses-enhances the potential for research, consultation and expansion, makes full
use of infrastructure and learning resources, contributes to the support and
development of students, provides leadership and good management, all of which
are Brings innovation and best practices. Various studies on higher education
innovation and quality, including strategic planning of higher education institutions,
innovation and best practices can change higher education institutions.
I have observed that the quality in higher education is more about fitness of
purpose which relates directly with the university mission and objectives for the
stakeholder(s) instead of fitness for purpose, and that university stakeholder(s)
influence the meanings of quality. My understanding with TQM changed by looking
at the current higher education system that has poor teaching quality, inconsistent
curriculum, excessive prices, and insufficient management capacity. The global
market requires skilled and talented labor, which can only be created through high-
quality education. Unlike industrial products, managing the quality of education is a
difficult task, but quality is the only currency that is generally accepted. This is also
the case when the product is education. We know very well that education quality
leads to future development, and quality improvement is a Endless process.
Therefore, it is necessary to focus on the quality of education. Due attention should
be paid to different educational classes such as schools, colleges and universities.
In order to solve the quality management problem, different organizations have
adopted different quality management strategies, and Total Quality Management
(TQM) is one of them. TQM is considered to have great potential to meet the
challenges. It can be used as a means to increase student / teacher morale,
increase productivity and provide higher quality services to internal and external
customers.