Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
106 views3 pages

Feed 2 Mibk Mixed L-1 L - 2 Vapour

This document contains process stream data from an Aspen Plus simulation. Stream L-1 shows almost complete pickup of acetone by MIBK. When using different activity coefficient models in Aspen Plus to simulate stream L-2, NRTL predicts a flow rate of 26.23 lb/hr with a mole fraction of acetone of 0.0645, while RK-Soave and ideal models predict no acetone in the stream.

Uploaded by

Jay Maradiya
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
106 views3 pages

Feed 2 Mibk Mixed L-1 L - 2 Vapour

This document contains process stream data from an Aspen Plus simulation. Stream L-1 shows almost complete pickup of acetone by MIBK. When using different activity coefficient models in Aspen Plus to simulate stream L-2, NRTL predicts a flow rate of 26.23 lb/hr with a mole fraction of acetone of 0.0645, while RK-Soave and ideal models predict no acetone in the stream.

Uploaded by

Jay Maradiya
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

STREAM NAME FEED 2 MIBK MIXED L- 1 L- 2 VAPOUR

From B1 B2 B2 B2
To B1 B1 B2
Stream Class CONVEN CONVEN CONVEN CONVEN CONVEN CONVEN
Maximum
Relative Error
Cost Flow $/hr
MIXED Substream
Phase Liquid Phase Liquid Phase Liquid Phase Liquid Phase Liquid Phase
Temperature F 75 75 59.38760512 75 75
Pressure psi 50 50 50 50 50 50
Molar Vapor
Fraction 0 0 0 0 0
Molar Liquid
Fraction 1 1 1 1 1
Molar Solid
Fraction 0 0 0 0 0
Mass Vapor
Fraction 0 0 0 0 0
Mass Liquid
Fraction 1 1 1 1 1
Mass Solid
Fraction 0 0 0 0 0
Molar Enthalpy cal/mol -62661.59085 -78113.40686 -70387.49885 -71585.62019 -69015.32501
Mass Enthalpy cal/gm -1646.923644 -779.8809558 -1018.570932 -850.8161246 -3830.927374
Molar Entropy cal/mol-K -55.6836605 -146.5452194 -100.7331732 -118.6981813 -39.05116857
Mass Entropy cal/gm-K -1.46352392 -1.463101283 -1.457700356 -1.410762753 -2.167666248
Molar Density mol/cc 0.020991102 0.007999324 0.011540832 0.009386109 0.053402832
Mass Density gm/cc 0.798662331 0.801217751 0.797519639 0.789724596 0.962068297
Enthalpy Flow cal/sec -789522.7639 -984212.3707 -1773735.135 -1393790.223 -395411.0131
Average MW 38.04766 100.16068 69.10417 84.13759227 18.01530498
Mole Flows lbmol/hr 100 100 200 154.5284264 45.47157362 0
MIBK lbmol/hr 0 100 100 100 4.78E-10 0
ACETONE lbmol/hr 50 0 50 49.99997165 2.84E-05 0
WATER lbmol/hr 50 0 50 4.528454733 45.47154527 0
Mole Fractions
Mass Flows kg/hr 1725.812827 4543.212022 6269.024849 5897.449116 371.5757331
Mass Fractions
Volume Flow l/min 36.01465353 94.50639386 131.0108772 124.4621468 6.437099009

Answer : So here MIBK pickup by acetone is seen as in L-1 stream that almost all acetone
pickup
ANSWER 2. FOR L-2 STRAM

BY SOLVING A ASPEN PLUS

METHOD TOTAL FLOW RATE (lb/hr) Acetone mole fraction


RK- SOAVE 45.5448538240839 8.20 E-07
IDEAL 0 0
WILSON 0 0
NRTL 26.2308192175165 0.0645111955259342

FOR NRTL
FOR RK SOAVE

FOR IDEAL

You might also like