Operations Bulletin

Bulletin No 130 Introducing Dirt Defence Filtration in the JIG Standards 20th August 2020

Summary
This JIG Bulletin introduces Dirt Defence Filtration (DDF) in conjunction with Electronic Water Sensor (EWS)
technology into the JIG Standards, to supplement the filtration technologies currently accepted by JIG.
Entities operating in accordance with JIG standards may start using the tested DDF or DDF+EWS combinations
listed below in accordance with the procedures stipulated in this document, which form part of the current
JIG standards with immediate effect.
Background
The aviation industry has worked continuously over the past several years to develop and evaluate new
technology to replace Super Absorbent Polymer (SAP)-based filter monitors (FM), without the need for vessel
configuration changes (drop-in replacement elements). The ultimate objective remains unchanged: to
eliminate SAP-based filtration from all aviation fuel handling applications for the reasons explained in JIG
Bulletin 105 and the documents referenced therein.
A joint industry programme designed and funded by JIG, IATA and A4A - the Joint Industry Filtration Field
Trial Group - was established in 2018 to conduct field evaluation of new filtration/sensing technology. The
scope of this joint field evaluation scheme includes only technology that has successfully completed the
required EI qualification testing and technical evaluation for robustness. Progress on the technical and field
evaluation of available replacement technologies has been communicated by JIG through regular Technical
Newsletters since the onset of the programme.
Introduction of Dirt Defence Filtration – Electronic Water Sensor combined technology
The field evaluation process that was followed for the combination of the Dirt Defence Filters (DDF) -
Electronic Water Sensor (EWS) shown in the table below has been completed. The review of the field
evaluation results from the joint industry group has demonstrated that, in the environments in which these
systems were tested, they prevent dirt and free water from reaching the aircraft, are durable in mobile
applications and have sufficient life for routine operations. It was therefore confirmed by the joint industry
group that the tested combinations met the acceptance criteria defined in the field trial protocol. As a result,
the joint industry group has recommended the adoption of the tested combinations listed below into the
standards. Reference to the JIPL Technical Evaluation Summary: SUMMARY LINK
Based on this recommendation, the DDF and EWS combinations listed below are adopted into JIG
standards with immediate effect, under the procedures defined in this document.
Filter/Sensor type FAUDI Aviation product number
Dirt Defence Element, 2” Model: DDO2.2-xx-2
Qualified to EI 1599 2nd ed.
Dirt Defence Element, 6” Model: DDO6.4-xx-2
Qualified to EI 1599 2nd ed.
Electronic Water Sensor (EWS) Model: AFGUARD®
conforming to EI 1598 2nd ed. Firmware Version: 01.19 or newer
Note: Users of JIG standards are reminded that JIG do not issue equipment or material approvals. It is the sole
responsibility of user companies to decide whether the equipment is acceptable for their use, suitable for their
operating environment and conditions and, where it’s deemed necessary, subjected to additional field evaluation.

Endorsed by IATA Technical Fuel Group 1

 Operations Bulletin
Bulletin No 130 Introducing Dirt Defence Filtration in the JIG Standards 20th August 2020

Requirements for DDF/EWS – Changes to JIG Standards

Users of JIG standards may use the technologies listed above in the applications shown in Appendix 1 of this
document. In Jet fuel applications, models of the tested DDF listed above shall only be used in conjunction
with the EWS listed above, as shown in Appendix 1. Users who are planning to implement the technologies
listed above shall follow the requirements detailed in Appendices 2-5, which form part of the current JIG
standards with immediate effect:
• Installation: See Appendix 2
• Routine Operation: See Appendix 3
• Routine Maintenance: See Appendix 4
• Documentation and Records: See Appendix 5
Process Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
A Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) study of this combined filter and sensor technology in fuelling
equipment was conducted. The review of results substantiated the end-to-end system functionality and has
been used in the development of the operating parameters included in this document.
An FMEA is a qualitative analysis of a system to identify potential failure modes, causes, effects and
consequences of those failures. JIG has carried out an end to end (i.e. fueller to wing tip, or hydrant coupler
to wing tip) FMEA study for the integration of DDF+EWS technology into hydrant dispensers and fuellers
using generic equipment configurations. The design basis used for this study is available on the JIG Website,
as an example template (TEMPLATE LINK). Where DDF+EWS technology will be adopted, an FMEA or similar
review should be carried out to establish potential failure modes on each vehicle design being used at a
location. For further information see Appendix 2.
Important points to consider for the FMEA are:
• A competent person trained in the FMEA process shall facilitate the study
• Team members shall be selected to provide a broad knowledge of both existing equipment and new
equipment e.g. Engineering, Design, Operations & Maintenance.
Management of Change (MOC)
Operators introducing the DDF+EWS options listed above into their operations shall exercise due diligence
in the development and implementation of appropriately authorised Management of Change plans
throughout the transition period. The following shall be taken into consideration as a minimum:
• Assess the suitability of this technology at the location by evaluating the historic into-plane fuel
cleanliness at the location, using information such as historic filter dP records with FM, FM changeout
history, routine drain records etc. Additional information can be sought from the JIPL Technical
Evaluation Summary.
• Assess the suitability of equipment on the vehicles that the system is to be connected to and
interfaced with (see section on FMEA above and Appendix 2).
• Comply with the installation requirements provided by the EWS manufacturer, and ensure
installation works are conducted by trained and competent technicians.

Endorsed by IATA Technical Fuel Group 2

 Operations Bulletin
Bulletin No 130 Introducing Dirt Defence Filtration in the JIG Standards 20th August 2020

• Update operating manuals, procedures, record forms, training and other documentation as required.
• Ensure relevant personnel receive appropriate training on DDF and EWS technologies and on the
required procedures.
• Ensure new operational data plates are attached to the filter vessel.
• Verify max achievable flowrate and ensure that the rated flow of the vessel is not exceeded.
• Ensure effective segregation of stocks of DDF elements from existing filter element stocks and any
other appropriate controls necessary to ensure DDF elements are not inadvertently mixed with FM
elements or are not inadvertently mixed within a single filter vessel with FM.
Particular attention shall be given to operator training to ensure full understanding of the conceptual
differences between existing filtration technologies and DDF+EWS combined technology. DDF are not
designed to remove free water and for Jet fuel shall be used in conjunction with the EWS listed above, which
is designed to detect free water and prevent it from passing downstream. Emphasis should be placed on the
DDF+EWS operating procedures, such as the steps required following an EWS system event. Further
information on new filtration/sensing technologies can be found in EI 1550.

Actions to Implement this Bulletin (See Table 1 for Action Type Codes)

Action Description Action Type Effective as of

Entities operating in accordance with JIG standards may use the
DDF/EWS technology introduced in this document, in accordance JS 24th August 2020
with the requirements detailed in this document.
Operators introducing the technology introduced in this Bulletin shall
establish a risk-based Management of Change plan as explained in RA 24th August 2020
this document.
Operators introducing the technology introduced in this Bulletin
RP 24th August 2020
should perform their own evaluation prior to full implementation.

Endorsed by IATA Technical Fuel Group 3

 Operations Bulletin
Bulletin No 130 Introducing Dirt Defence Filtration in the JIG Standards 20th August 2020

Appendix 1 – List of Applications where DDF or DDF+EWS technology may be used

The table below includes a list of applications where the tested DDF and DDF+EWS combinations listed in
this Bulletin may be used. This table supplements the filtration options currently accepted in the JIG
standards.
It is noted that Dirt Defence Filtration technology is considered comparable to Microfilters, with some
improved characteristics, e.g. improved mechanical strength (see EI 1550). Therefore, DDF qualified to the
latest edition of EI 1599 is an accepted alternative in applications where Microfilters qualified to the latest
edition of EI 1590 are currently accepted in JIG standards, without the need for an EWS.
Table 1 - Applications where DDF or DDF+EWS technology may be used

JIG Standards Application Accepted options

JIG1 Into-plane Jet Fuel DDF+EWS
Into-plane Avgas DDF
JIG2 Loading Jet Fuel DDF+EWS
Receipt/Loading Avgas DDF
JIG4 Into-plane Jet Fuel DDF+EWS
Into-plane Avgas DDF
Receipt Jet Fuel DDF
Loading Jet Fuel DDF+EWS
Receipt/Loading Avgas DDF

Endorsed by IATA Technical Fuel Group 4

 Operations Bulletin
Bulletin No 130 Introducing Dirt Defence Filtration in the JIG Standards 20th August 2020

Appendix 2 – Installation and Commissioning

EWS system assessment and commissioning

Electronic water sensor systems shall conform to the latest EN ISO 13849-1 with a minimum Performance Level
(PL) of PL(b). An assessment shall be conducted of the suitability of equipment on the vehicles that the EWS
system is to be connected to and interfaced with, as part of the detailed Management of Change (MOC)
plan, taking the following into consideration:
- The EWS system shall be installed by trained and competent technicians, in accordance with the
installation requirements provided by the equipment manufacturer.
- After installation and before putting vehicles into service with active DDF+EWS, all components in
the corresponding safety circuit should conform to the latest EN ISO 13849-1 with a minimum of
PL(b), with advice sought from the sensor, the vehicle and/or component manufacturers.
- When newly installed equipment is connected to an existing solenoid valve, an assessment of the
reliability of the solenoid valve shall be conducted to ensure this valve is fit for purpose.
- It shall be confirmed that the deadman override does not bypass the EWS system shutdown
capability.
It is recommended that a Failure Modes & Effects Analysis (FMEA) or other suitable Process Hazard Analysis
(PHA) study in fuelling equipment should be conducted, to evaluate failure modes associated with the
integration of the EWS system and associated procedures into a fuelling vehicle equipped with DDF.
The EWS system shall be commissioned by competent technicians, to ensure the EWS system is configured
properly, it functions as expected and that no unauthorised bypass routes are allowed by the vehicle design
(e.g. by the deadman override design).
Electronic Water Sensor system requirements
Electronic water sensor (EWS) systems used in conjunction with DDF technology introduced with this
Bulletin, shall include the following components:
- an EWS fitted downstream of filtration,
- a compatible controller (PLC) and
- a sensor warning light.
These systems shall be connected to the deadman system to ensure automatic fuel shutdown, under the
conditions specified below.
The EWS shall be fitted at a suitable position on the filter outlet. Instructions by the sensor manufacturer
shall be followed for the identification of the suitable position for sensor operation and accessibility for
routine testing.
A system reset mechanism shall be installed, which shall be controlled by authorised personnel only. This
may be an electronic reset with the use of a passcode to reset the system on the controller, a separate key-
operated reset mechanism or preferably both. In either case, the reset passcode and the reset key shall be

Endorsed by IATA Technical Fuel Group 5

 Operations Bulletin
Bulletin No 130 Introducing Dirt Defence Filtration in the JIG Standards 20th August 2020

strictly controlled by authorised personnel only. The reset mechanism shall be configured such that it
prevents a system reset by other means, e.g. by simply disconnecting - reconnecting the sensor cable or
using the deadman override.
EWS Warning Light
The EWS warning light should be blue in colour unless local airport regulations require a different colour. In
any case, the same colour shall be used on all vehicles equipped with EWS systems at a location.
The EWS warning light shall be prominently displayed on the fuelling vehicle exterior, enabling a clear,
unobstructed view for the fuelling operator at all times during fuelling, in all-weather/light conditions.
The EWS warning light shall be configured as follows:
1. Standby mode: Before fuel flow commences, light flashes intermittently in cycles (e.g. flashes
on and off twice in 0.5 seconds and then remains off for 2.5 seconds and then the cycle repeats).
2. Fuelling mode: When fuel flow commences, light constantly illuminates indicating that the
system is operational.
3. Check Level: A sensor indication between 15ppm and 30ppm of free water for at least 10 sec
shall trigger a slow flashing of the light to prompt the operator to take actions as defined below
under Check Level.
4. Alarm Level: A sensor indication greater than 30ppm of free water for at least 10 sec or greater
than 50ppm of free water for at least 5 sec shall trigger a faster flashing light (faster than Check
Level) and shall automatically shut down the fuelling. The operator shall then take actions as
defined below under Alarm Level.
In addition to the EWS warning light, the installation of an audible alarm may also be considered.

Additional considerations
For fuelling equipment fitted with DDF, consideration may be given to the following:
• An electronic bulk water detector, such as a device conforming to the latest edition of EI 1592, may
be installed at a suitable location upstream of filtration (e.g. vessel drain point). The optimum
position of electronic bulk water detectors depends on the filter vessel design and drain pipework
configuration. The guidelines provided by the bulk water detector manufacturer shall be adhered
to for the identification of the optimum position. Where fitted, bulk water detectors shall have the
capability of being function tested externally in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions
and at the frequency specified in the current JIG standards for water slug detection devices (JIG1-
A6.2.6).
• A dP limiting device such as a dP switch fitted on the piston-type dP gauge or other electronic dP
monitoring system may be installed on filter vessels fitted with dirt defence filters. Where fitted, dP
limiting devices shall be tested in accordance with the current JIG requirements (JIG1-4.10.3).

Endorsed by IATA Technical Fuel Group 6

 Operations Bulletin
Bulletin No 130 Introducing Dirt Defence Filtration in the JIG Standards 20th August 2020

Appendix 3 – Operations
DDF Draining and sampling

Routinely (all equipment): For filters fitted with DDF, routine draining (off-ramp for fuelling equipment)
shall be carried out under pressure daily, as currently required by the JIG standards.
Sampling during fuelling operations: Sampling procedures during fuelling operations shall be carried out as
currently required by the JIG standards. For systems fitted with an EWS, a CWD Check as specified in section
5.3 of JIG1 (A7.1 of JIG4), is not required unless the sensor triggers either a Check or an Alarm Level, in which
case the actions defined in the following section shall be followed.
Differential Pressure monitoring and reporting

The current JIG requirements for dP monitoring and recording apply for vessels fitted with DDF.
EWS operation

EWS systems shall be operated in accordance with the instructions provided by the EWS manufacturer and
the requirements detailed below.
At the beginning of fuelling before fuel flows, the operator shall check that the system is in standby mode
(as described in Appendix 2). If the EWS warning light is not illuminating intermittently (as described in
Appendix 2), that might be due to a system fault. The EWS system will not allow fuelling to start in that case
and the vehicle shall be withdrawn from service for an investigation by competent technicians.
When fuel flow commences, the operator shall confirm that the EWS warning light is constantly illuminated
(fuelling mode) indicating that the EWS system is functional, otherwise the fuelling shall not continue and
the operator shall return the vehicle to the depot for an investigation by competent technicians.
If the EWS warning light stops illuminating during the fuelling operation due to a system fault, the EWS
system will trigger an automatic shutdown of fuelling. The vehicle shall be withdrawn from service for an
investigation by competent technicians. If the EWS warning light stops illuminating during the fuelling
operation due to a bulb fault, the EWS system will not trigger an automatic shutdown due to the bulb fault.
The operator shall return the vehicle to the depot for repair, after the completion of fuelling.
Check Level Actions

A Check Level indication occurs if the EWS measures free water concentrations of 15-30ppm for more than
10 seconds. If a Check level indication occurs, the fuelling shall be stopped, and the operator shall conduct
a Visual Appearance Check followed by a CWD Check on a sample taken downstream of the filter. See Fig.1.
The fuelling shall only recommence if the sample passes the Visual Appearance Check and CWD Check.
When the vehicle returns to the depot, the cause of the Check Level indication shall be investigated by
competent technicians and the results documented. If the sample fails the Visual Appearance Check or CWD
Check, the fuelling operator shall stop the fuelling immediately and follow the actions for an Alarm Level
indication (see below).

Endorsed by IATA Technical Fuel Group 7

 Operations Bulletin
Bulletin No 130 Introducing Dirt Defence Filtration in the JIG Standards 20th August 2020

Alarm Level Actions

An Alarm Level indication occurs if the EWS measures free water concentrations of 30ppm-50ppm for more
than 10 seconds, or >50ppm for more than 5 seconds. When an Alarm Level indication occurs, the EWS
system shall automatically shut down the fuelling and the operator shall return the vehicle to the depot and
follow the actions described below and shown in Figure 1. The fuelling operator shall inform the location
management. Local procedures shall be in in place to notify the customer representative, and where
applicable, the Hydrant Operating Company.
Site specific procedures shall be developed for use in the event that a second fuelling vehicle is required to
complete a fuelling after an EWS system Alarm is triggered. These shall include additional Visual Appearance
Checks + CWD Checks and enhanced dP monitoring throughout the subsequent fuelling(s). Consideration
should be given to complete the fuelling with a vehicle fitted with other filtration technology (e.g. FWS) or
a fueller, where possible. The use of a hydrant flushing vehicle to flush the pit prior to completing a hydrant
fuelling should also be considered.
The first vehicle shall return to the depot where an investigation into the cause of the alarm shall be initiated.
The actions required before the vehicle is used in a subsequent fuelling are detailed in the following section.
Checks required after EWS system triggered
As part of the investigation of an EWS system Alarm activation and once the EWS system has been reset by
an authorised person, the following actions shall be taken:
- a fuel sample shall be taken from both sides of the filter (inlet and outlet) for a Visual Appearance
Check followed by a CWD Check as soon as practically possible after the system shutdown.
- The filter shall be flushed for at least 5 minutes at the maximum achievable flowrate, preferably on
a test rig or by recirculation through fuellers if no test rig is available.
- The filter dP at the maximum achievable flowrate shall be checked against the expected dP of the
filter and any abnormal variations shall be investigated.
The EWS override system shall be temporarily activated prior to fuel circulation by an authorised person,
and in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations and local written and management control
procedures, but only for the time required to complete the fuel circulation procedure described above.
When the process described above is complete, fuel samples shall be taken from both sides of the filter
under pressure, for a Visual Appearance Check followed by a CWD Check, before the vehicle returns to
service. The vehicle shall be removed from service and support sought from an authorised technician if:
- the fuel sample downstream of the filter fails the Visual Appearance or CWD Check and following
additional flushing as described above a satisfactory result cannot be obtained, or
- the above flushing procedure fails to restore the EWS warning light to constantly illuminated
(fuelling mode)
Significant air entrainment in the system may cause an alarm condition so this should be considered in any
investigation and addressed in local operating procedures.

Endorsed by IATA Technical Fuel Group 8

 Operations Bulletin
Bulletin No 130 Introducing Dirt Defence Filtration in the JIG Standards 20th August 2020

Following the investigation of an EWS system activation (Check or Alarm) and before the vehicle returns to
service, the system shall be reset by an authorised person.
Operation of EWS at fixed facilities
Where EWS is used at fixed facilities in conjunction with DDF for jet fuel loading (per Appendix 1), an
operating protocol that is consistent with the requirements specified for fuelling operations shall be
established and implemented.

Endorsed by IATA Technical Fuel Group 9

 Operations Bulletin
Bulletin No 130 Introducing Dirt Defence Filtration in the JIG Standards 20th August 2020

Figure 1 – DDF+EWS Operating protocol (Fuelling operations)

Endorsed by IATA Technical Fuel Group 10

 Operations Bulletin
Bulletin No 130 Introducing Dirt Defence Filtration in the JIG Standards 20th August 2020

Appendix 4 – New DDF element commissioning and Routine Maintenance

DDF element commissioning

When new DDF elements have been installed in fuellers and hydrant dispensers, product shall be flushed
through the unit either on a test rig or by recirculation on fuellers for at least 5 minutes at the maximum
achievable flowrate, preferably back to storage to remove air bubbles, small fibres, etc. Following
commissioning of new DDF elements, each hose-end strainer shall then be inspected and cleaned before
the unit is returned to service.
When commissioning new filter elements in fuelling equipment fitted with EWS or after other maintenance,
there may be air in the system which will trigger the EWS alarm and interfere with the procedure unless
overridden. Therefore, the EWS override system shall be temporarily activated by an authorised person,
prior to fuel circulation and in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations and local written and
management control procedures, but only for the time required to complete the fuel circulation procedure
described above.
Reinstatement of equipment fitted with DDF+EWS that has been out of service

The fuel circulation procedure described above shall also be followed for fuelling equipment fitted with EWS
that has been temporarily out of service or not used for more than a week, to flush any water accumulated
or condensed in the fuelling pipework over the period of dormancy before the vehicle returns to service.
Routine Testing of EWS
The function of EWS systems and associated on-vehicle systems shall be checked at least every 3 months
during fuel circulation on test rig, using the testing equipment supplied by the sensor manufacturer, in
accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The purpose of this function test is to verify the correct
function and response of the system to simulated events generated by the testing equipment. This function
test shall also be carried out as part of EWS recommissioning after recertification.
In addition, the certification of newly installed electronic water sensors shall be checked by the
manufacturer after 2 years from the date of the original EWS certificate and yearly thereafter or when issues
with EWS operation are encountered. After consultation with the sensor manufacturer and in accordance
with the manufacturer’s instructions, EWS shall be sent to the manufacturer or manufacturer’s authorised
service agent for recertification check and replaced if necessary:
- If they are damaged or malfunction
- If sensors are operated at conditions not recommended by the manufacturer
- If sensors are exposed to high pressure water streams during vehicle washing.
DDF Inspection and Routine Maintenance
The current JIG requirements for filter inspection and routine maintenance shall be followed for vessels
fitted with DDF elements. See Table 2 below.

Endorsed by IATA Technical Fuel Group 11

 Operations Bulletin
Bulletin No 130 Introducing Dirt Defence Filtration in the JIG Standards 20th August 2020

DDF element change criteria

DDF elements shall be replaced:
- If the differential pressure reaches 22 psi (1.5 bar) at (or corrected to) the maximum achievable flow
rate through the filter vessel as currently installed
- If flow rate falls to unacceptably low levels that cannot be substantiated by an investigation
- If acceptable filter membrane test results (downstream of filtration) cannot be obtained
- If unusual sediment is found downstream of the filter
- If there is a sudden drop in differential pressure without any obvious cause being found
- If elements are contaminated by microbiological growth (MBG) or MBG contamination of elements
is suspected
- If filter inspection identifies issues with the condition or structural integrity of elements
- After reaching the 5-year maximum service life recommended by the filter element manufacturer
if there is no other cause of concern. Note: JIG has taken the decision to follow the 5-yearly
recommendation of the filter element manufacturer, subject to further review when more
operational data is available.
Summary of Routine Test frequencies
Table 2 – Summary of routine test frequencies for DDF+EWS and associated systems

TEST FREQUENCY
Fuelling vehicles Daily Weekly Monthly 3-monthly 6-monthly Other Reference
Filter draining x A6.2.1
Filter differential pressure x A6.2.2
Filter dP graphs x A6.2.2
Filter membrane colorimetric test X A6.2.3
Double membrane or gravimetric x A6.2.3
(Fuelling equipment)
Filter internal inspection Yearly A6.2.4
Dirt Defence element change 5 years or Bulletin
cause (see 130/App4
above)
Electronic water sensor function x Bulletin
check (on-site) 130/App4
Electronic water sensor 2 years Bulletin
recertification (by OEM) (initial) then 130/App4
Yearly
Bulk Water Detectors x A6.2.6
dP limiting devices (e.g. dP x 4.10.3
switches)

Endorsed by IATA Technical Fuel Group 12

 Operations Bulletin
Bulletin No 130 Introducing Dirt Defence Filtration in the JIG Standards 20th August 2020

Appendix 5 – Documentation and Records

EWS Data capture

For vehicles fitted with DDF and EWS systems feeding a data capture system, the manufacturer’s
recommendations for data control and prevention of data loss shall be followed. It is recommended that a
data backup is taken on a routine basis and prior to any firmware updates.
The data recorded and retained for each into-plane operation shall include either confirmation that the
fuelling was conducted with water below 30 ppm throughout the entire fuelling, or the reason that an
interruption to the fuelling occurred (Check or Alarm Level). This shall include the free water levels reported
by the EWS system that prompted the fuelling interruption and a record of any associated Visual
Appearance Check and CWD Check results. A record shall also be kept when a delivery to a single aircraft
was made by two vehicles, in which case the records shall demonstrate that the quality of the overall
amount of fuel delivered was within the water specification limits.
This data should be reviewed monthly by site management to validate that all EWS activations (Check or
Alarm Level) are being appropriately addressed. Records of all checks performed as part of investigation of
an EWS activation (Check or Alarm Level) and actions taken shall be included in vehicle documentation.
For EWS, records should also be kept of the following, to aid an improved understanding of filter
performance and other diagnostic activities:
- The peak free water content for the uplift
- The average free water content over the uplift
- Average free water content over the previous 50 fuellings (which can be used in determining filter
performance trends)
Testing of EWS
For vehicles fitted with EWS systems, records shall be kept for:
- Function tests of EWS systems and associated on-vehicle systems carried out on a routine basis; as
part of EWS recommissioning; and after EWS recertification
- Valid Certification of EWS supplied by the manufacturer or manufacturer’s authorised service agent
following periodic recertification. Written confirmation of the EWS satisfactory performance and a
test report shall be provided by the testing party.
All records shall be filed in accordance with document retention requirements for at least 3 years.

Endorsed by IATA Technical Fuel Group 13

 Operations Bulletin
Bulletin No 130 Introducing Dirt Defence Filtration in the JIG Standards 20th August 2020

Table 1 Action Type Codes

Action Types JIG Bulletin Action Type Definition
JS Change to JIG Standard – to be adopted by JV and/or Operator to continue to meet the
JIG Standard(s) (JIG 1, 2, 4, EI/JIG 1530 and the JIG HSSE Management System).
RA Required Action to implement one off verification or checks outlined in the table of
actions.
RP JIG Recommended Practice which the JV should consider adopting as its own practice
(**).
I Issued for information purposes only.
Note (**) - If the JV agreements require any of the JIG Standards and/or any of the JIG Common Processes
as the governing operational standard then adoption of changes to applicable JIG Standards and/or
Common Processes should not be considered optional by the JV Board.
Note: This document is intended for the guidance of Members of JIG and companies affiliated with Members
of JIG, and does not preclude the use of any other operating procedures, equipment or inspection
procedures. The information contained in this publication is subject to constant review in the light of changing
government requirements and regulations. Although efforts are made to keep this information up-to-date,
accurate, complete, and free from error, we make no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express
or implied, that the information is up-to-date, accurate, complete, free from error, or in compliance with
applicable law and regulations. No subscriber or other reader should act on the basis of any such information
without referring to applicable laws and regulations and/or without taking appropriate professional
advice. None of JIG, its Members, the Companies affiliated with its Members accepts responsibility for any
loss or damage, whether in contract, tort (including negligence), breach of statutory duty, or otherwise, even
if foreseeable, arising under or in connection with your use, adoption or reliance on the information in this
document. You use this information at your own risk, but for the full terms and conditions concerning use of
this document, please refer to http://www.jigonline.com/legal-and-copyright/
JIG is the owner of the copyright and all intellectual property rights in the publication.
IATA uses such rights with permission from JIG.

Endorsed by IATA Technical Fuel Group 14