Abdominal Pain Content PDF
Abdominal Pain Content PDF
Abdominal Pain
ABDOMINAL PAIN
“The general rule can be laid down that the majority of severe abdominal pains which ensue in
patients who have been previously fairly well, and which last as long as 6 hours, are caused by
conditions of surgical import.”
Sir Zachary Cope (1881-1974)
Abdominal pain is one of the most common conditions for which patients seek medical care.
The differential diagnosis of abdominal pain is vast, and determining when emergent
intervention is required is essential. Appropriate diagnosis and subsequent treatment can be
challenging. The evaluation of a patient with abdominal pain begins with two important
principles: first, an understanding of the anatomy and physiology of the abdominal viscera
including blood supply and three-dimensional relationships; second, the ability to take a
thorough history and focused abdominal exam.
Anatomy
The abdominal cavity is the largest hollow space in the body and an in-depth understanding of
anatomy is critical. The abdominal cavity is bound superiorly by the diaphragm, which separates
the abdomen from the chest. The inferior boundary is the upper plane of the pelvic cavity.
Vertically the abdomen is enclosed posteriorly by the vertebral column and posterior
musculature and anteriorly by the abdominal wall muscles. The abdominal cavity contains the
majority of the digestive tract, liver, pancreas, spleen, and kidneys. Several major blood vessels
are contained within the abdomen including the aorta, inferior vena cava, and mesenteric
vessels.
The abdominal cavity is lined by a thin membrane called the peritoneum that covers the walls of
the cavity (parietal peritoneum) and every organ or structure (visceral peritoneum). The space
between the visceral and parietal peritoneum, commonly referred to as the peritoneal cavity,
normally contains a small amount of fluid that acts a lubricant and permits free movement of the
intraperitoneal viscera, particularly the gastrointestinal tract. Attachments of the peritoneum to
the body wall divide the abdominal cavity into several compartments. Abdominal structures are
further classified as intra-, retro-, or infraperitoneal depending on their relationship to the
peritoneal lining (Table 1).
The abdomen is commonly divided into four quadrants (Figure 1): left upper quadrant (LUQ),
right upper quadrant (RUQ), left lower quadrant (LLQ), and right lower quadrant (RLQ). Many
pathologies classically present with symptoms found in a specific quadrant and the location of
symptoms can assist in developing a differential diagnosis and guiding further testing and
treatment. Variation and overlap can exist, but a general understanding of the underlying
structures of each quadrant aids initial assessment.
Definitions
Acute abdomen refers to a sudden, severe abdominal pain that may indicate an emergency
and urgent surgical intervention.
Peritoneum is the membrane that forms the lining of the abdominal cavity and covers most of
the intraabdominal organs to provide support and act as a conduit for blood vessels, lymphatics,
and nerves. Abdominal structures are classified as intraperitoneal, retroperitoneal, or
infraperitoneal depending on location and relationship to the peritoneum.
Greater omentum is a large apron-like fold of fatty visceral peritoneum that hangs down from
the greater curvature of the stomach. It doubles back to the transverse colon before reaching to
the posterior abdominal wall.
Greater sac (peritoneal cavity) is the potential space between the parietal and visceral
peritoneum. It normally contains a thin film of fluid that acts as a lubricant allowing free
movement of the abdominal organs.
Lesser sac (omental bursa) lies posterior to the stomach and lesser omentum. It allows the
stomach to move freely against the retroperitoneal structures posterior and inferior to it. The
lesser sac is connected to the greater sac through a communication posterior to the portal triad
— the epiploic foramen (of Winslow).
Mesentery is a set of tissues that attach the bowel to the posterior abdominal wall, formed by a
double fold of peritoneum. Blood vessels, nerves, and lymphatics branch through the mesentery
to supply the gastrointestinal tract.
A thorough history and physical examination will lead to an appropriate differential diagnosis
and guide further evaluation with laboratory testing and/or imaging. A tremendous amount of
information is obtained through a careful history even before performing the exam. Especially
important is the recognition of patterns such as determining the chronicity of pain — whether the
pain is acute or chronic, pain character, and associated symptoms. The relative sensitivity and
specificity of a history and physical examination are low, but are critical in identifying emergent
conditions early and guiding treatment decisions.
Clinical judgment must be exercised to determine whether the history represents a rapid onset
of symptoms or one that is more chronic. There is no strict time cutoff for acute versus chronic
symptoms. Pain that has started less than a day prior to presentation is clearly acute, while pain
that has persisted for months or years can be safely classified as chronic. Pain is characterized
according to location, severity, aggravating and alleviating factors, and associated symptoms.
Location can assist in narrowing the differential diagnosis as different pain syndromes typically
have characteristic locations (Table 2). For example, RUQ pain generally points to a liver or
biliary source while RLQ pain is a typical hallmark of acute appendicitis. Radiation of pain may
also point to the source as is classically found with pancreatitis demonstrating pain that radiates
to the back.
RUQ
intense, dull pain, postprandial, plateaus with gradual
biliary colic improvement, nontender exam
acute cholecystitis prolonged pain (>6hrs), tender to palpation, Murphy's sign
choledocholithiasis elevated bilirubin, dilated bile duct
ascending cholangitis fever, jaundice, RUQ pain
biliary dyskinesia dysfunctional contraction of gallbladder
acute hepatitis fatigue, malaise, jaundice, dark urine
perihepatitis (Fitz-Hugh-
Curtis) increased pain with inspiration, right shoulder
hepatic abscess fever, tenderness
fever, distention (ascites), peripheral edema, GI bleeding,
Budd-Chiari syndrome encephalopathy
portal vein thrombosis dyspepsia, GI bleeding
Epigastric
acute myocardial
infarction shortness of breath, diaphoresis, exertional symptoms
acute pancreatitis radiation to the back
chronic pancreatitis radiation to the back, longer duration
peptic ulcer disease severe pain
gastritis heartburn, nausea, hematemesis
gastroparesis postprandial fullness, nausea, vomiting, bloating
LLQ
diverticulitis fever, distention (ileus), change in bowel habits, melena
PID/tubo-ovarian abscess bilateral pain, purulent vaginal discharge, fever, malaise
hernia palpable bulge
constipation
RLQ
acute appendicitis migrating periumbilical pain, fever, anorexia, nausea
Meckel's diverticulum currant jelly stool
PID/tubo-ovarian abscess bilateral pain, purulent vaginal discharge, fever, malaise
hernia palpable bulge
The onset, frequency, and duration of the pain are helpful features. The pain of biliary colic is
often dull and precipitated by fatty meals, while peritonitis from a perforated peptic ulcer is
sudden and severe. Gynecologic sources must be considered in women reporting abdominal
pain and premenopausal women should be asked about their menstrual history and use of
contraception.
Physical examination begins with vital signs. Unstable patients warrant expedited evaluation
and prompt interventions. A complete abdominal examination includes inspection, auscultation,
percussion, and palpation. General appearance and comfort or distress level are noted during
inspection with careful attention to the patient’s positioning and mobility. Intolerance to
movement or repositioning is typical of peritonitis, while patients with mesenteric ischemia may
writhe in extreme pain despite the absence of tenderness to palpation.
Historically, auscultation of the abdomen for bowel sounds was encouraged. The clinical value
of absent or present bowel sounds has been debated and recent studies show that neither
quantity nor quality of bowel sounds are predictive of small bowel obstructions [1]. The low
sensitivity and positive predictive value of bowel sounds together with examiner variability do
not support utilizing bowel sounds in clinical decision making [1-3]. An abdominal bruit,
however, is associated with renal artery stenosis, particularly if heard during diastole.
Gentle percussion can test for peritonitis and identify ascites and hepatomegaly. Tympany
signifies distended bowel, analogous to a hollow drum, while dullness may signify a solid
structure such as organomegaly or a mass (see Abdominal Mass module).
Palpation is the most effective way to evaluate tenderness. Examination should begin in the
quadrant with the least amount of pain and systematically proceed to the area of maximum
tenderness. Guarding is rigidity of the abdominal muscles and is an important finding. It can be
voluntary or involuntary, with the latter being a much more ominous finding suggesting
peritonitis. Rebound tenderness is pain elicited upon rapid removal of pressure causing
agitation of the parietal peritoneum.
All patients with complaints of abdominal pain should be examined for hernias (see Abdominal
Wall and Groin Mass module). Abdominal wall pathology may be found by palpation or by
noting appearance when using the abdominal wall muscles. Both ventral and groin hernias can
cause bowel obstruction and strangulation leading to perforation and sepsis.
Most patients with abdominal pain should have a rectal examination [4]. Fecal impaction might
explain symptoms of obstruction in older adults (see Vomiting, Diarrhea, and Constipation
module). Some patients with localized upper abdominal pain (e.g., right upper quadrant pain
without suspicion of upper GI bleeding) or abdominal pain that is likely from a non-
gastrointestinal cause (e.g., suspected cystitis) may not require a rectal examination. If a rectal
examination is performed, stool should be inspected for gross and occult blood.
The location of symptoms of abdominal disease processes can be categorized into foregut, mid-
gut, and hind-gut. The foregut includes those structures fed by the celiac trunk (stomach,
spleen, liver, etc.), the mid-gut are those structures fed by the superior mesenteric artery (small
bowel, appendix, right colon, etc.), and the hind-gut are those structures fed by the inferior
mesenteric artery (left colon, sigmoid colon, proximal rectum). Certainly, there are disease
entities that overlap, i.e., inflammatory bowel disease, but we will place them in the most
common region affected. We will list the most common core disease states under these
categories for simplicity.
FOREGUT
Gastroesophageal Reflux
Most people experience gastroesophageal reflux intermittently, particularly after a large meal.
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) occurs when the reflux amount is excessive to the
point of causing symptoms or esophageal mucosal injury. Survey data estimate that 25-40% of
Americans experience symptomatic GERD at least once a month and 7-10% of adults report
daily symptoms [19]. Patients with GERD exhibit various symptoms, both typical and atypical.
Typical symptoms include heartburn, regurgitation, and dysphagia. Atypical symptoms include
noncardiac chest pain, asthma, pneumonia, hoarseness, and aspiration.
Esophageal manometry and 24-hour pH monitoring are essential for diagnosis and planning an
antireflux operation. The most reliable way to determine the presence of abnormal reflux is
through pH monitoring or impedance testing. Manometry is used to determine the lower
esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and identify motility disorders. Achalasia can present with
symptoms similar to GERD, but the treatment is very different. An upper endoscopy or EGD
(esophagogastroduodenoscopy) confirms the diagnosis by demonstrating anatomic and
histologic changes such as esophagitis, strictures, Barrett esophagus, or hiatal hernias.
Upper endoscopy reveals a thickened, edematous gastric wall with erosions and reddened
folds. In more severe cases, ulcers and frank bleeding might be present and biopsies should be
obtained to test for H pylori.
No specific medical therapy exists for acute gastritis, except for cases caused by H pylori where
triple therapy with a PPI and dual antibiotics is warranted [14, 15]. Surgical intervention is rarely
necessary, except in cases of perforated ulcer disease (see Peptic Ulcer Disease section) or
necrosis seen with phlegmonous gastritis where resection of the affected area may be the most
effective form of treatment.
Epigastric pain is the most common symptom of peptic ulcer disease (PUD), often characterized
by a gnawing or burning sensation and frequently occurs after meals — classically, shortly after
meals with gastric ulcers and delayed with duodenal ulcers. “Alarm features" that warrant
prompt referral include bleeding, anemia, early satiety, weight loss, dysphagia, and family
history of gastrointestinal cancer.
Obtaining a medical history, especially for previous peptic ulcers, H pylori infection, nonsteroidal
anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use, or smoking, is essential. Food or antacids may relieve the
pain of duodenal ulcers but provide minimal relief in gastric ulcers. Patients may develop gastric
outlet obstruction from chronic duodenal ulcers and report fullness and bloating associated with
nausea and vomiting after eating. Patients with perforated PUD present with a sudden onset of
severe, sharp abdominal pain and peritonitis.
Physical exam findings are nonspecific and may include epigastric tenderness and guaiac
positive stool. Perforated PUD demonstrate signs of peritonitis and severe epigastric pain.
These patients may also demonstrate signs of shock, such as tachycardia, hypotension, and
anuria. Recognition of these finding is important for treatment and surgical consultation.
In most cases of uncomplicated PUD, routine laboratory tests are not particularly helpful. PUD
diagnosis largely depends on radiographic and endoscopic confirmation with testing for H pylori
infection. Upper GI endoscopy (EGD) is the preferred diagnostic evaluation. EGD provides an
opportunity to visualize the ulcer, determine the presence and degree of active bleeding, and
attempt hemostasis by direct measures. Biopsies for H pylori testing and pathology should be
obtained.
Most patients with uncomplicated PUD are treated successfully with acid suppressive
medications, eradication H pylori infection, and avoidance of NSAIDs. The recommended
treatment for H pylori infection is triple therapy with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and dual
antibiotic course [14, 15]. The indications for urgent surgery include failure to achieve
hemostasis endoscopically or recurrent bleeding despite endoscopic attempts (see
Gastrointestinal Bleeding module), or perforation. Overall, the number of emergent operations
for perforated ulcers has decreased because of the success of medical therapy. However,
perforated PUD remains a serious diagnosis and requires urgent intervention. Most duodenal
and distal gastric perforations are treated successfully with a patch of omentum sutured over the
perforation (Graham Patch). Gastric ulcers require biopsies to rule out a malignancy. Definitive
ulcer procedures such as vagotomy with antrectomy are rarely performed during the initial
operation unless the patient is hemodynamically stable, failed previous medical therapy, or had
multiple recurrent PUD episodes. Laparoscopy for PUD treatment has been demonstrated to be
as safe as and with comparable outcomes compared to laparotomy. Patient stability,
comorbidities, and surgeon skill and experience guide the surgical approach [16].
https://www.facs.org/-/media/files/education/core-curriculum/abdominal_pain_gastritis.ashx
Gallbladder Pathology
Biliary colic and cholecystitis are part of a spectrum of biliary tract disease that ranges from
asymptomatic gallstones on one end, to ascending cholangitis on the other [9]. Most patients
with gallstones are asymptomatic, but stones may temporarily obstruct the cystic duct or pass
through into the common bile duct, leading to biliary colic. In some cases, biliary colic can
progress to acute cholecystitis when obstruction at the cystic duct is prolonged (usually >6
hours) [10]. Choledocholithiasis occurs when stones pass into the common bile duct, with the
potential sequelae of obstruction and ascending cholangitis.
Typical biliary colic consists of 1-5 hours of RUQ pain that may radiate to the epigastrium or
right shoulder. The onset of pain often develops after a meal, occurs frequently at night, and can
be severe enough to waken the patient from sleep. Common associated symptoms include
nausea and vomiting.
Acute cholecystitis presents similar to biliary colic, except that symptoms usually occur for more
than six hours. Fever is more commonly associated with cholecystitis and the majority of
patients report having experienced similar episodes in the past. Elevated bilirubin and dilated
bile ducts suggest choledocholithiasis and obstruction. Ascending cholangitis is the most
serious infectious biliary condition. The triad of RUQ pain, fever, and jaundice (Charcot’s triad)
must raise suspicion and demands immediate intervention. Reynolds pentad adds the findings
of shock (i.e., hypotension) and altered mental status and is indicative of a deteriorating
condition.
Vital signs parallel the degree of illness. Patients with biliary colic have relatively normal vital
signs while patients with cholangitis can have fever, tachycardia, and hypotension. Abdominal
examination is remarkable for epigastric or right upper quadrant tenderness and abdominal
guarding. A halt in inspiration with palpation of the right upper quadrant (Murphy’s sign) is both a
sensitive and predictive test for acute cholecystitis, but less so in diabetic and elderly patients
[11]. A palpable fullness in the RUQ may be appreciated (Courvoisier's sign - associated with
cholangiocarcinoma), but is rarely present in the early clinical course.
Workup includes comprehensive laboratory studies, which may be normal in cases of simple
symptomatic cholelithiasis and biliary colic. Elevated white blood cell (WBC) counts and hepatic
profiles are common. Elevated bilirubin should prompt attention to the common bile duct and
pancreatic region.
Ultrasonography is the best initial imaging modality for the diagnosis of both cholelithiasis and
cholecystitis. The presence of stones, gallbladder wall thickening, and fluid around the
gallbladder (pericholecystic fluid) support a diagnosis of acute cholecystitis (Figure 2). Air in the
gallbladder often indicates gangrenous progression and is an ominous sign. Advanced imaging
such as hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HIDA) and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography
(MRCP) have utility in patients in whom the diagnosis is unclear or need further assessment of
the biliary tree. CT scans are less sensitive as the majority of gallstones are of the same density
of bile and are not visualized. Gallbladder wall thickening and pericholecystic fluid can be seen
on CT in addition to information about other abdominal structures such as the stomach,
pancreas, and bowel.
Elective surgery is indicated in patients with biliary colic and symptomatic cholelithiasis.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is effective and has few complications. Urgent laparoscopic
cholecystectomy should be performed within 72 hours of admission in cases of acute
cholecystitis. Unstable patients may need more urgent intervention with endoscopic retrograde
cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for choledocholithiasis or percutaneous drainage of the gall
bladder. Patients with choledocholithiasis should undergo ERCP to clear the common bile duct
prior to definitive surgery.
Ultrasound demonstrating findings of acute cholecystitis including, wall thickening, pericholecystic fluid, and sludge.
Case courtesy of Dr. Maulik S Patel, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 20542.
Pancreatitis
Acute pancreatitis is a common cause of inpatient admissions. Alcohol consumption and biliary
stones are the most common causes. Trauma, medications, and invasive procedures are other
causes. In 10-30% of cases, the cause is unknown. Sudden dull epigastric pain with radiation to
the back is most common. Fever and tachycardia are common abnormal vital signs.
Hypotension indicates increased severity and urgency. Exam findings include abdominal
tenderness, guarding, and distention. Lung sounds may be diminished along the bases
indicating pleural effusions.
Laboratory tests are obtained to support the working diagnosis of acute pancreatitis and are
helpful in determining the precipitating cause. CT imaging with intravenous contrast is often
performed and the inflammatory changes within the pancreas are helpful in determining the
presence and extent of pancreatic necrosis (Figure 3). Scans obtained in the early stages of the
episode are less sensitive as the inflammatory changes may not be present until days after
onset of symptom. Multiple scoring systems have been developed to predict the severity of
pancreatitis and direct treatment plans.
Acute pancreatitis with peripancreatic inflammation and lack of parenchymal enhancement indicating necrosis
(arrow). Case courtesy of Dr. David Cuete, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 23302.
Medical management of mild acute pancreatitis is relatively straightforward. The patient is kept
NPO and intravenous fluid hydration is provided. Analgesics are administered for pain relief.
Antibiotics are generally not indicated [12]. If gallstones are present and the suspected cause of
pancreatitis is thought to be related to them, a cholecystectomy should be performed during the
same hospital admission. Patients with severe pancreatitis require intensive care and often
volume and pressor support. Image-guided aspiration may be useful for differentiating infected
from sterile necrosis and for draining fluid collections after first two weeks. Carbapenem
antibiotics are used in cases complicated by infected pancreatic necrosis (Figure 4). Surgical
techniques have evolved from extensive open operations to a stepwise video-assisted
retroperitoneal debridement in conjunction with percutaneous drains [13]. The principles of
surgical management remain unchanged — source control to limit sepsis, or hemorrhage
control. Patients often develop peripancreatic fluid collections, referred to as pseudocysts that
may require an additional drainage procedure if symptomatic.
Macroscopic appearance of pancreatic necrosis. Case courtesy of Dr. Henry Knipe, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 27638.
Splenomegaly
The spleen is a functionally diverse organ with active roles in immunity and hematopoiesis. It is
located in the LUQ adjacent to several structures including the stomach, left kidney, colon, and
tail of the pancreas. A normal spleen weighs 150 g and is around 10-12 cm and usually not
palpable. Splenomegaly is defined as enlargement with dimensions of 11-20 cm classified as
moderate, and severe if greater than 20 cm [40].
Although a wide variety of diseases are associated with enlargement of the spleen, common
primary causes include immune response hypertrophy (infectious mononucleosis), erythrocyte
destruction hypertrophy (hereditary spherocytosis or thalassemia major), and congestive
(splenic vein thrombosis and portal hypertension). Other causes include trauma, cysts,
hemangiomas, metastasis, abscess, and medications.
Patients with splenomegaly may complain of mild, vague, abdominal discomfort. Some may
also report LUQ pain or referred pain to the left shoulder. Enlarged abdominal girth is
uncommon, but early satiety from gastric compression is not. Proper physical examination
should include palpation with the patient in the supine and right lateral decubitus positions. In
extreme splenomegaly, the lower splenic pole may extend into the pelvis or cross the abdominal
midline (see Abdominal Mass module).
Splenomegaly workup depends on the suspected etiology. A complete blood count with
differential, platelet count, and peripheral blood smear are appropriate. CT scanning is the
imaging study of choice for assessing size and is sensitive in detecting mass lesions,
calcifications, infarcts, and cysts (Figure 5). CT remains the most useful preoperative
investigation to measure splenic volume, assess lymph nodes at the splenic hilum, detect
accessory spleens, and splenic abscesses. Non-traumatic splenic rupture is a rare but life-
threatening condition. Abdominal CT scan is often essential, especially if the clinical diagnosis is
unclear, and there should be a low threshold for laparotomy if the patient remains
hemodynamically unstable despite resuscitation [41].
Medical treatment of the primary disorder can lead to regression without the need for surgery.
Splenectomy may be indicated to help control or stage the underlying disease in cases of
splenomegaly such as immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) or autoimmune hemolysis. The vast
majority of elective splenectomies are performed using laparoscopic techniques. Laparoscopic
splenectomy is safe and associated with reduced hospital stay compared to an open approach.
Laparoscopic resection can be safely performed on individuals with massive splenomegaly.
Massive splenomegaly from myelofibrosis with multiple infarcts. Concurrent hepatomegaly. Prominent mesenteric
vessels likely from venous engorgement given the dilated splenic and portal veins. Case courtesy of Dr. Wael
Nemattalla, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 10633.
MID GUT
Acute Appendicitis
Acute appendicitis is the most common time-sensitive surgical condition in the United States [5].
It is thought to be the result of obstruction to the appendiceal lumen leading to increased intra-
luminal pressure and possible bacterial overgrowth [6]. The classic symptoms are pain
migrating to the RLQ, nausea, and anorexia. Other pathology may present with a similar
pattern, requiring clinicians to consider a broad differential diagnosis, including gastrointestinal,
urologic, and gynecologic pathology.
A full history and physical exam is performed, including questions about inflammatory bowel
disease and a complete menstrual and pregnancy history in women. Pain over McBurney’s
point (one-third the distance from the anterior superior iliac spine to the umbilicus) is a classic
presenting sign of acute appendicitis. Additional findings include Rovsing’s sign (pain in the
RLQ when pressure is applied to the LLQ and released quickly), obturator sign (pain with
passive rotation of the flexed right hip), and psoas sign (pain on extension) of the right hip
suggesting a retrocecal appendix in contact with the iliopsoas muscle.
Laboratory findings will typically reveal a leukocytosis. Other tests that should be ordered
include a basic metabolic panel, coagulation profile, pregnancy test in women of childbearing
age, and a urinalysis. The diagnosis can often be made clinically without imaging, but imaging
studies are helpful and have become standard. The two most common imaging modalities are
ultrasound and computed tomography (CT). CT has significantly higher sensitivity and
specificity, but carries risks of ionizing radiation, especially in children. A dilated, thickened
appendix with surrounding inflammatory changes is consistent with acute appendicitis
(Figure 6). Perforation and evolving phlegmon or abscess formation are found in 15-30% of
patients, and more commonly seen with delayed presentations [7]. Ultrasound is operator
dependent and often limited by overlying gas-filled bowel obscuring the view of the appendix.
Axial and coronal images demonstrating radiographic findings of acute appendicitis. Enlarged fluid-filled appendix
(yellow arrow) with appendicoliths. Case courtesy of Dr. David Cuete, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 27049.
Enterocolitis
Enterocolitis is inflammation in the digestive tract specifically affecting both the small intestine
and the colon, and is typically limited to the mucosa. There are several different types of
enterocolitis, each with their distinct symptoms and etiology. Neutropenic enterocolitis, also
known as typhlitis, is acute transmural inflammation often limited to the cecum and ascending
colon in patients who are severely immunosuppressed [28]. Its exact pathogenesis is not
completely understood but thought to be related to invasion of the bowel wall from impaired host
protection. Clinical presentation can be dramatic, and the outcome may be devastating.
Symptoms often mimic acute appendicitis with RLQ pain and tenderness. Medical treatment
includes bowel rest, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and withholding further chemotherapy until
complete recovery. Surgery is indicated in patients with peritonitis or signs of perforation.
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) occurs when the inflammation is accompanied by the death of
tissues in the lining of the intestine. The problem is most common in premature, formula-fed
infants and is the most common gastrointestinal emergency in neonates. The cause remains
unknown. Research suggests a multifactorial cascade of ischemia exacerbated by activation of
proinflammatory intracellular processes. Clinical findings include increased residual gastric
volumes, bilious vomiting, abdominal distention, bloody stools, lethargy, and poor skin
perfusion. When intestinal perforation occurs, guarding may be found on abdominal
examination, but may not be apparent in weak premature infants. Plain film radiographs may
show small bowel distention or pneumatosis intestinalis (gas in the bowel wall). Treatment starts
with stopping oral feedings, orogastric suction, systemic antibiotics, and correction of metabolic
and electrolyte abnormalities.
The only absolute indication for surgical intervention is pneumoperitoneum. Necrotic bowel is
resected and the proximal bowel is made into a stoma. Severe disease may require extensive
bowel resection, resulting in short bowel syndrome. An alternative treatment option in select
situations is bedside drainage of the peritoneal cavity in the right lower quadrant using local
anesthesia. NEC resolves in one-third of cases without further treatment and the overall survival
rate is more than 50%. Intestinal strictures are a common late complication and may require
additional intervention.
Clostridium difficile colitis results from a disturbance of the normal bacterial flora of the colon,
usually after antibiotic use, leading to bacterial overgrowth. C difficile is a gram-positive,
anaerobic, spore-forming bacteria. C difficile colitis commonly presents with mild to moderate
diarrhea and abdominal cramping. In severe cases, patients with C difficile colitis can develop
peritonitis and fulminant life-threatening colitis. Leukocytosis is common and pronounced levels
correlate with a worse prognosis [29]. Stool cultures are the most sensitive tests for detecting C
difficile, but have a long turnaround time. Enzyme immunoassays and real-time PCR are more
practical and commonly used. Mild to moderate disease can be treated with oral metronidazole,
with oral vancomycin reserved for severe or complicated cases. Patients with colonic perforation
or a deteriorating clinical condition need surgical intervention with either total abdominal
colectomy or diverting loop ileostomy combined with colonic lavage in select settings [30].
https://www.facs.org/-/media/files/education/core-curriculum/abdominal_pain_enterocolitis.ashx
The classic symptoms of nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and constipation are rarely present
in all cases of SBO, but abdominal pain is often described as cramping and intermittent. Without
treatment, the pain can increase and progress to perforation and ischemia in high grade or
closed loop obstructions. High clinical suspicion is paramount for early identification and
intervention. Constipation and failure to pass flatus are common presenting symptoms, with
abdominal discomfort and distention the most frequent physical examination findings [34].
Physical examination should include careful evaluation for incarcerated hernias — ventral and
groin — and evaluation for signs suggesting intestinal ischemia (fever, tachycardia, and
peritoneal signs). No physical examination method exists to differentiate simple partial
obstruction from early strangulated obstruction, and serial abdominal examinations are
important to detect changes early.
Plain radiographs with an abdominal series are a common first step for suspected SBO
(Figure 7). Upright films may help with the diagnosis if air-fluid levels are present or if a paucity
of distal bowel gas is observed. CT imaging has been shown to be a particularly effective tool
capable of detecting complications of SBO including ischemia, perforation, mesenteric edema,
and pneumatosis, which should prompt surgical attention (Figure 8).
Initial treatment of SBO depends on patient condition and exam findings. Peritoneal signs,
sepsis, or clinical suspicion for strangulation or perforation should prompt urgent surgical
intervention. Patients without concerning findings can be safely managed with nonoperative
management with nasogastric tube decompression and bowel rest [35]. Many protocols exist
including the use of water-soluble oral contrast for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes
[36]. Surgery is recommended after an established period, usually 24-72 hours, of nonoperative
management without resolution. Open surgery is frequently required as laparoscopic
approaches may be limited by the distended bowel and an increased risk for bowel injury.
Surgical intervention is centered on identifying the source of obstruction and assessing bowel
viability. Necrotic bowel requires resection with primary anastomosis.
Less common causes of SBO are usually apparent on inspection of the small bowel. Volvulus
can be reduced by untwisting the mesentery and intussusception can be reduced by gently
milking the proximal intussusceptum out of the distal intussuscipiens. Masses can be resected
and in all situations, bowel viability must be assessed. Hernias can be approached through an
incision over the hernia (umbilical, inguinal) with low threshold for conversion to open
laparotomy if there is concern for bowel strangulation. For hernias where strangulated bowel is
suspected, one should not attempt reduction of the hernia until operative intervention to allow
inspection of the involved loop of bowel.
Postoperatively, the nasogastric tube should be continued until there is return of bowel function
as many patients will develop an ileus. Care should be taken to maintain the patient’s volume
status and replenish all electrolyte abnormalities. Nutritional status is important to prevent
complications including wound infection and dehiscence.
Plan abdominal X-ray demonstrating multiple dilated loops of small bowel. Note the multiple surgical clips and tacks
indicating prior surgery. Case courtesy of Dr. Ian Bickle, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 34633.
Dilated fluid-filled small bowel loops with abrupt transition to collapsed small bowel associated with a focal kink and
narrowing of the lumen (arrow). Case courtesy of Dr. Chris O'Donnell, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 31252
HIND GUT
Diverticulitis
Diverticular disease (diverticulosis, diverticulitis) describes the presence of diverticula, small
pouches in the wall of the colon, that arise when the inner layers of the colon push through
weaknesses in the outer muscular layers. Diverticula can occur anywhere in the colon, but are
most common in the descending and sigmoid colon. Diverticulitis arises when diverticula
become inflamed or infected. The usual initial symptoms include abdominal pain (most
commonly in the LLQ), nausea, vomiting, constipation, fever, and bloating. Common exam
findings include localized tenderness, distention, rebound tenderness and guarding. Other less
common findings are suprapubic, flank, or costovertebral tenderness, pneumaturia, fecaluria,
purulent vaginal discharge indicating the presence of a colovesicular or colovaginal fistula
respectively.
Laboratory findings may show a leukocytosis. Other basic labs are helpful in identifying
metabolic derangements. A urine culture may distinguish sterile pyuria due to inflammation from
polymicrobial infection related to a fistula. Pregnancy tests should be obtained in any female of
childbearing age.
CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis is considered the best imaging method to confirm the
diagnosis. Colonic wall thickening or pericolic fat stranding indicate inflammation and
extraluminal air can confirm perforation. A phlegmon or abscess may also be present. The
Hinchey system (Table 3) is often used to grade the severity of diverticulitis and guide
management recommendations [17].
of patients admitted for acute diverticulitis. Elective resection after colonoscopy to rule out
underlying malignancy can be offered to patients after uncomplicated diverticulitis and impaired
quality of life. The timing and number of recurrent episodes required before elective resection
remains a topic of ongoing debate.
https://www.facs.org/-/media/files/education/core-curriculum/abdominal_pain_enterocolitis.ashx
Symptoms of IBD generally depend on the area of the intestinal tract involved and commonly
include abdominal pain, cramping, and diarrhea. Fever, tachycardia, dehydration, and toxicity
may be present in more severe flares. Toxic megacolon is a severe complication of IBD and is a
surgical emergency. Patients often appear septic with high fever, tachycardia, and severe
abdominal pain with distention.
Evaluation of IBD relies on determining the extent and location of involved bowel and obtaining
tissue for diagnosis. In the acute setting, CT of the abdomen and pelvis with contrast is a good
choice to look for acute complications such as abscess, obstruction, or perforation and also to
eliminate other causes of an acute abdomen. Endoscopy is essential in workup, surveillance,
and management. Both colonoscopy and EGD are required for demonstrating mucosal
inflammation and obtaining tissue for diagnosis. However, the risk of perforation from
endoscopy in an acute flare is high and is to be avoided in the acute setting.
Surgical intervention for UC patients is indicated when medical therapy fails, disease duration
lasts longer than ten years, those with colonic dysplasia or malignancy, toxic megacolon, or
perforation [27]. The two most common operations are total proctocolectomy with end ileostomy
and total proctocolectomy with ileoanal anastomosis. Primary anastomoses should be avoided
in the setting of acute inflammation due to leak risk.
https://www.facs.org/-/media/files/education/core-curriculum/abdominal_pain_inflammatory.ashx
Colon Obstruction
Volvulus occurs when a part of the colon twists on its mesentery resulting in obstruction and
ischemia. The two main types of colonic volvulus are sigmoid and cecal. Chronic constipation
leads to an overloaded sigmoid colon that is prone to torsion along the axis of an elongated
mesentery. Alternatively, incomplete cecal and ascending colonic embryologic fixation
predisposes torsion of the cecum, terminal ileum, and ascending colon.
Patients with volvulus are usually elderly, debilitated, and bedridden and often have a history of
dementia or psychiatric impairment. The majority present with acute and less commonly with
subacute or chronic symptoms. A history of chronic constipation is common. Presentation is
similar regardless of the anatomic site, usually with abdominal pain, distention, obstipation, and
constipation (see Vomiting, Diarrhea, and Constipation module).
Abdominal distention can be striking and characteristically tympanitic over the gas-filled, thin-
walled colon. Rebound tenderness raises the concern of peritonitis. Depending on the presence
and extent of bowel ischemia or peritonitis, signs of systemic toxicity may be apparent.
Respiratory and cardiovascular compromise can result from the massive abdominal distention.
Distention of the sigmoid colon loop arising from the pelvis and extending to the diaphragm is a
typical finding of sigmoid volvulus on plain abdominal radiography. The walls of the loop may be
evident as lines converging in the described as a “coffee bean sign” or “bent inner tube sign”
(Figure 9). CT for sigmoid volvulus is often unnecessary, as plain radiographic findings are
usually sufficient. Radiographic findings for cecal volvulus may be less evident and CT is helpful
to better identify the location of the torsion and assess for evidence of ischemia.
Markedly dilated loop of colon with a coffee-bean sign pointing to the RUQ. Case courtesy of Dr. Wael Nemattalla,
Radiopaedia.org, rID: 10633.
Patients without evidence of peritonitis or bowel ischemia can be initially treated with
resuscitation and detorsion with sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy and rectal tube placement. The
patient can then be fully prepped for sigmoidectomy during the same admission as recurrence
can be as high as 50%. If the patient has evidence of peritonitis or ischemic bowel, emergency
surgery for resection is needed.
Obstructions caused by tumors tend to have a gradual onset and result from tumor growth
narrowing the colonic lumen. Right-sided colon lesions can become large before obstruction
occurs because of the larger capacity of the right colon and soft stool consistency. Sigmoid and
rectal tumors cause obstruction much earlier as the colon is narrower and the stool is harder.
Changes in stool caliber strongly suggest carcinoma especially when associated with weight
loss.
Endoscopic dilation and stenting is helpful in selected cases and may be palliative with
unresectable tumors or temporarily alleviate symptoms until more definitive surgery can be
performed [39]. In most cases, masses can be effectively treated with a partial colectomy with
lymphadenectomy after proper staging workup can be completed.
Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a life-threatening condition if not diagnosed promptly and
treated appropriately. Morbidity and mortality associated with AMI is unfavorable and a high
index of suspicion is essential as the clinical presentation is often nonspecific [42]. AMI results
from four main processes: arterial embolism (50%) typically associated with previous myocardial
infarction or atrial fibrillation, acute arterial thrombosis (25%) from diffuse atherosclerosis,
nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia (20%) from hypovolemia or reduced cardiac output, and
rarely venous thrombosis (5%) associated with portal hypertension, abdominal sepsis, and
hypercoagulable states.
Patients with arterial embolism initially present with severe sudden-onset diffuse abdominal pain
that is out of proportion to the examination. As the ischemia worsens, patients may develop
nausea and vomiting, bloody diarrhea, and eventually peritonitis. Patients with acute thrombotic
mesenteric occlusion may present with similar symptoms, but usually have a history of chronic
postprandial pain (intestinal angina) accompanied by weight loss and food fear. Nonocclusive
mesenteric ischemia is typical consequence of cardiogenic or hypovolemic shock, as blood is
shunted away from the mesenteric circulation without an acute occlusion of the vessels. Pain is
usually not as sudden as compared to embolic or thrombotic occlusion and many of these
patients are already hospitalized for life-threatening conditions.
White blood cell count and lactic acid are often elevated and a significant metabolic acidosis can
be present. Abdominal radiographs are of little utility and may only reveal late signs consistent
with bowel ischemia, such as intestinal pneumatosis or free air. Ultrasonography is often limited
by gas-filled loops of bowel obscuring visualization of the mesenteric vessels. Fluoroscopic
angiography is considered the gold standard with views of the celiac, the superior mesenteric
(SMA) and the inferior mesenteric (IMA) arteries. Angiography is rarely performed due to
invasiveness and lack of immediate availability that can delay needed surgery.
CT angiography (CTA) has become the imagining modality of choice due to rapid evaluation of
the aorta and mesenteric vessels, small bowel wall, and other potential causes of abdominal
pain (Figure 10). Findings highly suggestive of AMI include SMA or SMV filling defects,
intestinal pneumatosis, portal venous gas, and lack of bowel-wall enhancement [43].
Central filling defect in the superior mesenteric artery distal to the middle colic artery takeoff (arrow). Multiple small
bowel loops show wall edema / thickening and hypo-enhancement suggesting ischemia. Case courtesy of Dr.
Abdallah Al Khateeb, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 43593.
Patients with suspected bowel ischemia should be started on broad-spectrum antibiotics and
anticoagulation before surgery. The primary goals of surgery are to restore blood flow and
resect the segments of nonviable bowel (Figure 11). Ischemic bowel may recover dramatically
after restoring blood flow and should be observed after reperfusion before any decision for
resection is undertaken. Acute SMA embolism is approached with laparotomy and embolectomy
to remove the offending clot. Surgical treatment of acute thrombotic mesenteric occlusion
typically consists of a bypass of the affected vessel because a simple thrombectomy usually
leads to recurrent occlusion. Treatment of venous thrombosis is nonsurgical with
anticoagulation to reverse the hypercoagulable state. Careful monitoring is needed with full
anticoagulation due to risks of gastrointestinal bleeding.
Visual characteristics of ischemic bowel with clear demarcation to healthy perfused segments. Case courtesy of Dr. Ian Bickle,
Radiopaedia.org, rID: 52750.
Many mechanisms that decrease the structural integrity and compliance of the arterial wall have
been found to contribute to the development of AAAs including genetic and environmental
factors such as smoking. 90% of AAAs occur between the renal arteries and the aortic
bifurcation. Rupture with subsequent exsanguination is the most dreaded complication of AAA
and most aneurysms cause no symptoms prior to rupture.
The vast majority of AAAs are asymptomatic, yet classically patients may report back pain,
hypotension, and a pulsatile abdominal mass (see Abdominal Mass module). However, this
triad is present in a minority of patients [45, 46]. Most AAAs 5 cm or larger are palpable as a
pulsatile abdominal mass in the mid-abdomen. The aneurysm may be slightly tender to
palpation and more severe tenderness should raise concern of an inflammatory process, and
demands urgent surgical evaluation. The average patient with an AAA less than 5.5 cm in
diameter can be observed unless rapid expansion is noted.
Ultrasound is the least expensive method for measuring AAAs and is cost effective for serial
observations [47]. However, ultrasound examinations do not delineate adjacent structures as
well as CT or MR and are less reliable in obese patients. CT and MR are susceptible to
evaluator variability in size determinations especially when the course of aorta is oblique
resulting in cross-sectional measures that overestimate the diameter.
Treatment primarily consists of surgical repair. Intact aneurysms can undergo elective surgical
repair while ruptured aneurysms require emergency repair with a mortality rate of nearly 90%
[48]. Permissive hypotension by withholding aggressive fluid resuscitation so as not to worsen
bleeding should be implemented. Systolic pressures of 100-120 mm Hg or to the lowest level
while still maintaining adequate vital organ perfusion should be targeted with beta blocker
administration.
Open repair requires direct access to the aorta via an abdominal or retroperitoneal approach to
replace the aneurysmal segment with a synthetic fabric graft. Endovascular repair using a
synthetic graft has been advocated for patients that meet criteria with adequate vascular access
to will allow insertion of device catheters, appropriate aortic diameter, angulation, and length
[49]. Long-term results of both endovascular open repairs are good in the elective setting with
endovascular repair favored due to lower morbidity. Emergent repair in ruptured AAA carries a
much higher morbidity and mortality profile with both open and endovascular techniques.
Volume status and renal function should be closely monitored and managed in the
postoperative period. Ischemia of the left colon can occur following AAA repair regardless of
IMA reimplantation, and is more common following emergent repairs. Colon resection may be
required if ischemia progresses to necrosis or perforation.
GYNECOLOGIC/GENITOURINARY CONCERNS
Gynecologic etiologies
Gynecologic pathology must be considered in female patients presenting with abdominal pain.
Several processes contain significant overlap in signs and symptoms with gastrointestinal
etiologies. Ruptured ovarian cysts or ovarian torsion can present with RLQ pain similar to acute
appendicitis. Ruptured ectopic pregnancy is an emergency due to hemorrhage and patients
frequently present with lower abdominal pain and signs of shock. Patients may report
amenorrhea or a known diagnosis of pregnancy. A negative pregnancy test effectively rules out
ectopic pregnancy and transvaginal ultrasound is highly sensitive in confirming intrauterine
pregnancy [50]. The absence of an intrauterine pregnancy in the setting of a positive pregnancy
test is highly suggestive of an ectopic pregnancy if the β-hCG value is elevated and transvaginal
ultrasound does not show intrauterine pregnancy, typically after about six weeks from the last
menstrual period.
Ultrasound is also an important tool to evaluate the ovaries. Ultrasound will identify a mass or
cyst if present, and can make the diagnosis of ovarian torsion if blood flow is not reliably
identified. Both ectopic pregnancy and ovarian torsion are surgical emergencies [51].
Gynecologic consultation should be obtained immediately if either diagnosis is suspected. A
delay in surgical intervention can result in loss of the ovary or death. Ruptured ovarian cyst
without torsion can often be managed without surgery using pain medication. Occasionally large
cysts require removal if the pain continues, if torsion cannot be ruled out, or if tumor is
suspected [52].
Other gynecological causes of lower abdominal pain include pelvic inflammatory disease (PID),
salpingitis, and endometriosis. Laparoscopy is the current gold standard for the diagnosis of PID
and endometriosis as no specific laboratory test exists. CT and ultrasound may be helpful in
unclear cases but often are not specific. Most patients with PID are treated with empirical
antimicrobial medications effective against C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae. Hormonal
therapy is the mainstay for medical treatment of endometriosis with surgical interventions
reserved for severe cases or in those where fertility is no longer desired.
https://www.facs.org/-/media/files/education/core-curriculum/abdominal_pain_enterocolitis.ashx
can ascend from the bladder to the kidney resulting in pyelonephritis often manifested with
costovertebral angle tenderness. Fever and chills are common and severe infections may
rapidly progress to sepsis. Antibiotic therapy is tailored to cultures after identification and
sensitivity is determined. Prognosis is favorable with adequate treatment of both the infection
and underlying cause.
Nephrolithiasis (kidney stone) is a common reason for emergency departments visits with
patients reporting moderate to severe abdominal and flank pain similar to diverticulitis,
appendicitis, or cholecystitis [53]. As the stone advances through the ureter, the pain may
radiate to the groin. Many patients have a history of previous stones. CT without contrast is
preferred to better detect radiopaque stone in the urinary tract. Most stones smaller than 5 mm
will pass without intervention. Oral analgesia may be required for symptomatic relief. Patients
with large stones, UTI, intractable pain, or obstruction should be evaluated by an urologist for
possible surgical intervention.
Testicular torsion refers to twisting of the spermatic cord structures and subsequent loss of the
blood supply to the affected testicle. This is a urological emergency and early diagnosis and
treatment are vital to saving the testicle and preserving future fertility [54]. Testicular torsion is
more common in adolescents and neonates, but may occasionally occur in older men. Patients
typically present with a sudden onset of severe unilateral scrotal pain followed by inguinal
and/or scrotal swelling. The pain may decrease as necrosis sets in. Many patients also present
with gastrointestinal symptoms, nausea, and vomiting, thus overlapping with many
intraabdominal processes. When the diagnosis is suspected, routine imaging studies are not
necessary and may delay valuable time for definitive diagnosis. Ultrasonography with Color
Doppler may be useful when a low suspicion exists to evaluate blood flow and rule out
ischemia. Treatment of testicular torsion varies according to patient age and requires urologic
expertise.
https://www.facs.org/-/media/files/education/core-curriculum/abdominal_pain_enterocolitis.ashx
PEDIATRIC CONSIDERATIONS
Pediatric patients require specialized treatment as the surgical care of children differs from
adults in many respects. Pediatric surgical pathology varies according to age and development.
Infants and children may suffer from congenital abnormalities and diseases not seen in adults,
and management requires an experienced understanding.
various acute and chronic presentations. The most common type is incomplete rotation
predisposing to midgut volvulus requiring emergent operative intervention [55].
Acute midgut volvulus typically presents during the first year of life with sudden bilious emesis.
Physical findings may vary depending on the degree of malrotation, but are usually associated
with abdominal distention with tenderness. Intestinal ischemia can lead to signs of shock
including lethargy, hypotension, and decreased urine output.
Upper GI series is the gold standard to diagnose intestinal malrotation, but should only be
obtained in patients who are hemodynamically stable and not actively vomiting. Normal rotation
is confirmed if the duodenal C-loop crosses the midline and places the duodenojejunal junction
to the left of the spine at a level equal or superior to the pylorus (Figure 12). Water-soluble
agents should be used if the study is to be obtained prior to emergent operative intervention.
Immediate care should be directed toward resuscitation and stabilizing the patient and pediatric
surgical consultation. The Ladd procedure remains the cornerstone of surgical treatment for
malrotation, classically described as reduction of the volvulus (typically accomplished by twisting
counterclockwise), division of mesenteric bands, placement of small bowel on the right and
large bowel on the left of the abdomen, and appendectomy. After the blood supply has been
restored by detorsion, the bowel must be assessed for viability as nonviable segments must be
resected. If multiple areas of questionable viability are present, the bowel may be left in
discontinuity for a second-look operation to preserve bowel length before committing to
resection of potentially recoverable bowel.
Upper GI with small bowel follow through. The distal duodenum, duodenojejunal flexure, and proximal jejunum do not
cross the midline. The remainder of the small bowel lies to the right of the spine. The ascending colon is to the left of
spine. Case courtesy of Dr. Aditya Shetty, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 27934
Hernia
Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common pediatric operations performed. Most inguinal
hernias in children are indirect inguinal hernias (see Abdominal Wall and Groin Mass module).
Other less common types of ventral hernias include umbilical and epigastric hernias. All
pediatric inguinal hernias require operative treatment to prevent the development of
complications, such as incarceration or strangulation. Umbilical hernias typically do not cause
any symptoms and do not require surgical repair until approximately 5 years old and may be
managed by simple observation [56].
Hirschsprung Disease
Hirschsprung disease results from the absence of enteric neurons within the myenteric and
submucosal plexus of the rectum and colon. Early recognition and surgical correction of
Hirschsprung disease protects affected infants from enterocolitis and debilitating constipation.
Hirschsprung disease is relatively rare and occurs in approximately 1 per 5000 live births and is
four times more common in males [57].
Most affected children present by two years of age with distention, failure to pass meconium
within the first 48 hours of life, and poor nutritional status. Older children may present with
chronic constipation that is refractory to treatment. Hirschsprung enterocolitis can be a fatal
complication that can progress to sepsis, transmural intestinal necrosis, and perforation.
Diagnosis is made by rectal biopsy, either with suction rectal biopsy or transanal wedge
resection, 2-2.5 cm above the dentate line on the posterior wall to minimize the risk of
perforation. Histologic examination is performed to assess for the presence or absence of
ganglion cells.
The surgical options vary and include colostomy at the level of normal bowel, staged procedure
with colostomy followed by a pull-through procedure, or a single-stage pull-through procedure.
Depending on the setting, these operations can be performed at the time of diagnosis or after
the child has had rectal irrigations. Colostomy followed by pull-through is generally reserved for
those patients who present with sepsis due to enterocolitis or massive distention as most
patients can be treated in a single-stage.
Pyloric stenosis
Pyloric stenosis is the most common cause of intestinal obstruction in infancy and occurs
secondary to hypertrophy and hyperplasia of the muscular layers of the pylorus, resulting in a
functional gastric outlet obstruction. Classically infants present with nonbilious projectile
vomiting and is more common in males. As the obstruction becomes more severe, the infant
may show signs of dehydration and malnutrition.
A firm, mobile, nontender “olive” mass can be palpated in the RUQ in as many as 60-80% of
patients and is nearly pathognomonic for pyloric stenosis [58]. Ultrasound is the most sensitive
and specific imagining modality. The diagnosis can be confirmed when the muscle thickness is
greater than 4 mm and the length of the pylorus is greater than 16 mm. Hypochloremic-
hypokalemic metabolic alkalosis is the classic electrolyte and acid-base imbalance found in
pyloric stenosis. Prolonged vomiting leads to loss of hydrogen and chloride ions. As progressive
volume is lost, the kidneys attempt to maintain extracellular volume by resorbing sodium, which
in turn results in paradoxical aciduria as hydrogen and potassium ions are excreted (see Fluid &
Electrolytes module for additional information).
Immediate treatment requires fluid resuscitation and repletion of electrolytes starting with
isotonic crystalloid solutions and transitioning to 5% dextrose in 0.45% normal saline with
supplemental potassium. Once electrolyte and acid-base abnormalities are corrected, surgery
may be performed. Pyloromyotomy is the current procedure of choice, which involves dividing
the underlying pyloric muscle fibers and leaving the mucosal layer intact. Traditionally, the
pyloromyotomy was performed through an open approach; however, studies have shown
laparoscopic pyloromyotomy to have fewer complications, reduced time to full feeds and
hospital length [59, 60].
Intussusception
Illustration demonstrating invagination of proximal bowel (intussusceptum) out of the distal bowel (intussuscipiens)
leading to obstruction. Illustration courtesy of Olek Remesz, Wikimedia.org.
Meckel’s diverticulitis
Meckel’s diverticulum is the most common congenital abnormality of the small intestine. It
results as an incomplete obliteration of the vitelline duct (omphalomesenteric duct). Meckel’s are
usually asymptomatic but may develop complications requiring attention. Ectopic mucosal tissue
within the diverticulum can cause GI bleeding and pain. Other complications include obstruction,
inflammation, and rarely perforation. In children, the most common presenting symptom is
hematochezia [62].
Meckel’s diverticula are located on the antimesenteric border of the ileum, 10-90 cm from the
ileocecal valve. The Meckel’s scan with radiolabeled tracer is the preferred imaging modality as
it is noninvasive, requires limited radiation exposure, and is more sensitive that other contrast
studies. Heterotopic gastric mucosa will enhance indicating a positive result.
https://www.facs.org/-/media/files/education/core-curriculum/abdominal_pain_meckels.ashx
Ex vivo Meckel’s diverticulum (black arrow) after resection. The yellow arrow denotes the stapled proximal bowel.
The diverticulum was acting as a lead point for intussusception causing pain. Photo courtesy Dr. L. Kasey Welsh.
Child abuse
Physical child abuse, also referred as nonaccidental trauma (NAT), is any injury inflicted by a
parent, guardian, or other supervising adult. It is estimated that 1 million children per year in the
United States suffer injuries that qualify as NAT. In most cases, the victim is under 3 years of
age with an unstable home environment. A pattern of discrepancy between the history provided
and the magnitude of the injury, delayed presentation, frequency of injury, or injuries in an infant
less than one year old should raise suspicion. The guardians may be evasive or hostile. To
determine whether a child's injury was likely to have been inflicted rather than accidental, the
clinician must establish the full extent of the injury and must understand the child's
developmental level and abilities.
Physical findings that raise concern include injury patterns inconsistent with the history, multiple
injuries of various stages of healing, forced immersion burn patterns, bruising beyond bony
prominences (ears, facial cheeks, neck, genitals), and patterned markings resembling objects
[64]. Photo documentation of injuries, when possible, is often helpful when working with
authorities.
Treatment for NAT is complex requiring a multidisciplinary approach and can often be
emotionally demanding. The nature of the injuries will determine the level of treatment needed
in addition to social services and law enforcement involvement. The American Academy of
Pediatrics declares that pediatricians are mandated reporters of suspected abuse, and reports
to child protective service agencies are required by law when the physician has a reasonable
suspicion of abuse [65]. Child protective services (CPS) agencies are responsible for performing
investigations and rely on medical evaluations from physicians. CPS is also responsible in
assessing caregiving abilities, environmental safety, risk for repeat abuse, and risk to other
siblings. Even if no obvious fracture if present, a full skeletal radiographic survey should be
performed to assess for occult injuries and evaluate for evidence of previous trauma. In cases of
severe or multisystem trauma, pediatric surgeon involvement may be necessary.
SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES
The differential diagnosis of abdominal pain can also vary based on special considerations.
These considerations include patients who are pregnant, had recent surgery, are getting
chemotherapy, are on steroids or who are immunocompromised. The physician has to take into
account these issues and the potential implications on diagnosis, treatment and outcome.
Pregnancy
Pregnant patients may present with atypical abdominal pain depending on the stage of
pregnancy. Pregnancy after the 20th week can cause displacement of abdominal organs by the
enlarging gravid uterus. For example, a pregnant woman may have more centralized or right
mid abdominal pain with appendicitis. The imaging, antibiotics and surgical management of
abdominal pain in pregnant women has to be tailored to techniques that are safest for mother
and fetus.
Immunocompromised Patients
Patients receiving chemotherapy or who are immunosuppressed or on steroids may also
present with atypical abdominal pain. Physical exam findings may be more subtle if the patient’s
immune system is unable to mount a normal inflammatory response. This can also be reflected
in abnormal laboratory values, such as neutropenia in patients receiving chemotherapy, or
Postoperative Patient
Assessing abdominal pain in a postoperative patient can be difficult. Abdominal procedures are
expected to cause pain, so learning when pain is out of proportion to the expected pain is
essential. New onset of abdominal pain cannot always be attributed to the surgical procedure.
For example, a patient with a recent orthopedic procedure who has abdominal pain may have a
simple postoperative ileus or a severe colitis from antibiotics administered at the time of surgery.
QUESTIONS
Case #1
A 60-year-old woman with a history of chronic abdominal discomfort presents with the sudden
onset of severe generalized abdominal pain. Further history reveals that the patient is a smoker
and has had many months of general, centralized abdominal pain. She describes that pain as
burning and sometimes causing nausea. She has taken antacid medication on occasion for this
chronic pain. The pain she is having now is very different. It is sharp and continuous and started
exactly two hours ago. It is not radiating. Movement makes the pain worse. Taking a deep
breath makes the pain worse. She has never had pain like this before and has no prior surgery.
She denies weight loss, change in bowel habits or change in appetite. On physical exam, the
patient is tachycardic and clearly in distress. She is flat in bed and reluctant to change position.
She has a low-grade fever and her abdomen is diffusely tender and rigid with peritonitis.
1. What is the likely diagnosis?
A. Gastritis
B. Gastroesophageal reflux
A. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD)
Case #2
A 58-year-old man with a history of alcohol abuse presents with worsening generalized
abdominal pain, emesis, low grade fever and confusion. He reports battling alcohol addiction for
many years. He started having generalized abdominal pain about two days ago, but over the
past 24 hours, it has gotten worse. He cannot eat and has had several episodes of bilious
emesis. His wife brought him to the emergency room when she found him confused and
collapsed on the floor. The pain has been continuous for the past two days and nothing
improves his symptoms. He has never had surgery and there have been no other changes in
his bowel function. Over the past few months, the patient has lost a little weight, mostly because
his drinking has been out of control and he forgets to eat. He is tachycardic, diaphoretic, and is
only oriented to person, but not place or time. His blood pressure is 86/40. He recognizes his
wife, but is not cooperative with the exam. Examination of the abdomen reveals minimal
distension and generalized tenderness to palpation, especially centrally. There are no masses.
There is a suggestion of ascites.
A. Alcohol intoxication
B. Liver failure
C. Pancreatitis
D. Malignancy
E. Infection
D. A and B
Case #3
A 40-year-old woman who had a previous open appendectomy as a child presents with
generalized abdominal pain, bilious emesis, and anorexia. She was previously healthy until
earlier in the day when she began having waves of intermittent, cramping abdominal pain. She
has never had pain like this before, but she described the pain as similar to labor pain. Nothing
she does makes the pain better. The pain is not exacerbated by anything, but shortly after the
pain started, she had two episodes of bilious emesis. She has had no fever or other changes to
her bowel function. Her last stool was 12 hours before and was normal. She has two young
children and no significant medical history apart from an open appendectomy done at the age of
8 years. On examination, her vital signs are normal. She appears unwell and she complains of
intense nausea. Her abdomen is soft but distended and tympanitic to percussion. There is no
peritonitis or palpable masses.
B. Colon obstruction
C. Ovarian torsion
D. Food poisoning
B. MRCP
C. Colonoscopy
D. Exploratory laparotomy
A. Surgical consultation
B. Bowel rest
D. Laxatives
E. A, B and C
Case #4
An 80-year-old man with a history of atrial fibrillation presents with severe generalized
abdominal pain and confusion. Further history reveals that he has a history of hypertension,
chronic pulmonary disease from smoking, and diabetes. Earlier in the day, he began having
sudden severe abdominal pain. The pain continues to be severe and relentless and is
associated with nausea — described as diffuse and getting worse. Upon arrival to the
emergency room, he had a large, foul smelling, dark stool and was becoming more confused.
On exam, he is moaning in pain. He is in atrial fibrillation and is becoming hypotensive. He is
diaphoretic and only oriented to person and place. His abdomen is soft and not distended.
There are no obvious masses or peritonitis.
A. Ruptured appendicitis
D. Myocardial infarction
Case #5
A 41-year-old woman presents with right upper quadrant abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting.
She had a baby three weeks ago and had a similar episode during her pregnancy after eating
some pizza, but it was short lived and never occurred again. The current pain developed about
thirty minutes after eating ice cream. The pain was severe and associated with nausea and a
non-bilious emesis. She has had no fever, weight loss, malaise or ill contacts. This attack again
began in the right upper quadrant but was much worse than the prior attack. She came to the
ER for evaluation, and after about an hour, the pain began to spontaneously get better. Physical
exam reveals a moderately obese woman with stable vital signs. Her abdominal exam is
normal.
A. Cholelithiasis
B. Choledocholithiasis
C. Cholecystitis
D. Gallstone pancreatitis
E. Cholangitis
B. CBC
C. Abdominal ultrasound
Case #6
A 16-year-old boy presents with fatigue, sore throat and severe left upper quadrant pain. He has
had a sore throat and fever (100.4 F) and been complaining of feeling very tired over the last
week. He has no history of recent travel or ill contacts. The left-sided abdominal pain started
about a week ago and has gotten worse. Nothing makes the pain better or worse, and the
patient has a hard time getting comfortable. The pain is constant and has always been located
in the left upper quadrant. The patient has never had surgery before. His bowel function is
normal, but he does feel full all the time which makes it hard for him to eat very much. Physical
exam reveals a tired appearing patient. Temperature is 100.1 F and other vital signs are normal.
There is abdominal fullness in the left upper quadrant with tenderness to palpation. He has
enlarged lymph nodes bilaterally in his neck. The remainder of the physical exam is normal.
A. Acute appendicitis
C. Splenomegaly
Case #7
A 14-year-old boy presents with right lower quadrant pain, low grade fever and anorexia. His
mother reports that he was perfectly well until 12 hours ago when he began having a vague
centralized abdominal pain. He had an episode of non-bilious emesis after dinner, and tried to
go to sleep in order to feel better. He awoke in the middle of the night with severe right sided
abdominal pain. The patient’s mother brought him to the emergency room because he was
having a hard time walking. The patient complains of pain with any movement at all. He has no
ill contacts, recent travel or other symptoms. He has never had pain like this before. The pain is
now constant. Physical exam reveals an otherwise healthy boy. He has a temperature of 100.5
and is lying still on his side with his legs drawn up. His vital signs are normal. With difficulty he is
able to lie on his back. Abdominal exam reveals tenderness to palpation of the right lower
quadrant with rebound and involuntary guarding.
A. Acute appendicitis
B. Acute cholecystitis
D. Crohn’s ileitis
C. Intravenous antibiotics
D. Surgical consultation
A. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
B. Intravenous antibiotics
C. Laparoscopic appendectomy
D. No treatment indicated
Case #8
A 20 year old woman presents with sudden onset of right lower quadrant pain and emesis.
Discussion:
Further history reveals that the patient was perfectly well until the sudden development of right
lower quadrant abdominal pain. The pain is described as constant and getting worse. The
patient has had no fever and had one episode of emesis upon arrival to the emergency room.
No significant past medical history and the patient has never had surgery. She takes no
medication and had her last menstrual cycle two weeks ago. Physical exam reveals a patient in
distress from the pain. She is tachycardic, but her other vital signs are normal and there is no
fever. It is hard for her to get comfortable for the examination. Abdominal exam reveals
discomfort in the bilateral lower quadrants. The remainder of the exam is normal.
A. Acute appendicitis
C. Ovarian torsion
D. Ectopic pregnancy
F. B, C and D
A. Pregnancy test
C. CBC
D. Pelvic examination
Case #9
A 72-year-old woman presents with left lower quadrant abdominal pain, nausea and fever. She
reports that the pain started about two weeks ago and is getting worse and is constant. The pain
is generalized, but worse in the left lower quadrant of the abdomen. She reports associated
nausea and had one episode of non-bilious emesis. She has also noted some changes in her
stool frequency, as has felt constipated over this same period despite passing flatus. She feels
very bloated and is not interested in eating. The patient has been a smoker for a long time. She
takes ibuprofen daily for her chronic knee pain. Her physical exam shows an obese woman who
is tachycardic and febrile to 101.5. Her blood pressure is normal and she is oriented to person,
place and time. She has left lower quadrant tenderness and appears unwell.
A. Diverticulitis
B. Sigmoid volvulus
C. Bladder infection
D. Acute appendicitis
A. Colonoscopy
B. CBC
C. Stool samples
E. B and D
Case #10
A 3-day-old full term baby boy presents with sudden onset of bilious emesis, generalized
abdominal pain and fussiness. The mother reports that the child has been perfectly healthy until
suddenly developing two episodes of bilious emesis. The baby was born at term and has been
passing stools regularly. He is now very fussy and seems to have generalized abdominal pain.
He refuses to eat. On physical exam, he is tachycardic and afebrile. He has a large bilious
emesis while you are examining him and seems uncomfortable. His abdomen seems soft and
not distended. The remainder of the exam is normal.
A. Intestinal intussusception
B. Formula intolerance
C. Pyloric stenosis
A. UGI
B. Barium enema
C. Abdominal X-ray
D. Abdominal CT scan
A. Upper endoscopy
Case #11
A 9-month-old baby presents with an upper respiratory tract infection, abdominal pain, fussiness
and bloody stools. He is an otherwise perfectly healthy baby who began having symptoms
about six hours ago. He does not want to eat and seems very uncomfortable. He has had an
episode of non-bilious emesis. There are periods of time when he screams uncontrollably and
draws his legs up. When the pain wave passes, he is lethargic and appears exhausted.
Recently he was noted to pass red, gelatinous (currant jelly) stools from below. He has had an
upper respiratory tract infection for the past few days, but is otherwise very healthy. Physical
exam reveals a well-nourished appearing 9-month-old baby. He is fussy but has normal vital
signs. He has some residual nasal secretions but his lungs are clear. The abdominal exam is
significant for distension, with a palpable right-sided abdominal mass, which is tender to deep
palpation. Rectal exam shows bloody, gelatinous stool.
A. Pyloric stenosis
B. Ileocolic intussusception
D. Surgery
ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS
Case #1
A 60-year-old woman with a history of chronic abdominal discomfort presents with the sudden
onset of severe generalized abdominal pain. Further history reveals that the patient is a smoker
and has had many months of general, centralized abdominal pain. She describes that pain as
burning and sometimes causing nausea. She has taken antacid medication on occasion for this
chronic pain. The pain she is having now is very different. It is sharp and continuous and started
exactly two hours ago. It is not radiating. Movement makes the pain worse. Taking a deep
breath makes the pain worse. She has never had pain like this before and has no prior surgery.
She denies weight loss, change in bowel habits or change in appetite. On physical exam, the
patient is tachycardic and clearly in distress. She is flat in bed and reluctant to change position.
She has a low-grade fever and her abdomen is diffusely tender and rigid with peritonitis.
A. Gastritis
B. Gastroesophageal reflux
The correct answer is C. The chronic abdominal pain suggests peptic ulcer disease. The fact
that this attack of pain is sudden (the patient can pinpoint exactly when the pain occurred) and
severe, implies that likely there is a perforation of the ulcer. Although gastritis and
gastroesophageal reflux can cause chronic abdominal pain, they do not cause peritonitis. One
would expect symptoms of respiratory infection (cough, fever, sputum) if pneumonia was the
cause of the referred abdominal pain. Additionally, peritonitis is not a typical feature of referred
abdominal pain, as the pain is related to diaphragm irritation and not peritoneal irritation.
The correct answer is B. X-rays of the abdomen are the best initial study to obtain. The X-rays
should include supine and upright views of the abdomen and a chest X-ray. These studies will
demonstrate a large amount of free air and this makes the diagnosis of perforated peptic ulcer
disease highly likely. Although a CT scan can also be done, it is expensive, time consuming,
and exposes the patient to unnecessary radiation. It is not appropriate to refer for outpatient
surgical consultation. This patient requires an urgent surgical consultation.
A. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD)
The correct answer is C. In the case of peptic ulcer disease without perforation, it would be
appropriate to consider GI consultation and antacid therapy, while scheduling the patient for
EGD to look for H pylori infection and ulcer disease. However, this patient has a perforation,
which is a surgical emergency. Although many peptic ulcers are caused by chronic H pylori
infection which is treated with antibiotics and acid blockade, IV antibiotics alone are not
indicated in this setting. Prompt surgical exploration and repair is the correct choice. Typical
surgical repair involves closure of the perforation with an overlay of tissue reinforcement using
omentum or falciform ligament. This procedure is commonly known as a Graham patch.
Case #2
A 58-year-old man with a history of alcohol abuse presents with worsening generalized
abdominal pain, emesis, low grade fever and confusion. He reports battling alcohol addiction for
many years. He started having generalized abdominal pain about two days ago, but over the
past 24 hours, it has gotten worse. He cannot eat and has had several episodes of bilious
emesis. His wife brought him to the emergency room when she found him confused and
collapsed on the floor. The pain has been continuous for the past two days and nothing
improves his symptoms. He has never had surgery and there have been no other changes in
his bowel function. Over the past few months, the patient has lost a little weight, mostly because
his drinking has been out of control and he forgets to eat. He is tachycardic, diaphoretic, and is
only oriented to person, but not place or time. His blood pressure is 86/40. He recognizes his
wife, but is not cooperative with the exam. Examination of the abdomen reveals minimal
distension and generalized tenderness to palpation, especially centrally. There are no masses.
There is a suggestion of ascites.
A. Alcohol intoxication
B. Liver failure
C. Pancreatitis
D. Malignancy
E. Infection
The correct answer is F. Clearly, this patient is gravely ill. He is tachycardic, diaphoretic,
hypotensive and confused. Although there is a strong history of alcohol abuse, it is not
appropriate to assume intoxication is the sole cause of the patient’s symptoms or confusion. All
of the listed diagnoses could be considered.
D. A and B
The correct answer is D. Labs should be drawn at the same time IV access is established.
While resuscitating the patient, it would be appropriate to plan for his admission to the intensive
care unit (ICU). When the patient’s condition stabilizes, it would be appropriate to obtain a CT
scan with contrast of the abdomen to evaluate for pancreatitis. While surgical consultation may
ultimately be required, surgical management of pancreatitis is ultimately reserved for cases of
necrosis and sepsis and would only be considered if imaging suggested pancreatic necrosis.
The patient may need to be intubated and have central venous access established upon
admission to the ICU. If infection is suspected, the patient may also need antibiotics. CT scan
would also be helpful to identify malignancy if it is present.
Case #3
A 40-year-old woman who had a previous open appendectomy as a child presents with
generalized abdominal pain, bilious emesis, and anorexia. She was previously healthy until
earlier in the day when she began having waves of intermittent, cramping abdominal pain. She
has never had pain like this before, but she described the pain as similar to labor pain. Nothing
she does makes the pain better. The pain is not exacerbated by anything, but shortly after the
pain started, she had two episodes of bilious emesis. She has had no fever or other changes to
her bowel function. Her last stool was 12 hours before and was normal. She has two young
children and no significant medical history apart from an open appendectomy done at the age of
8 years. On examination, her vital signs are normal. She appears unwell and she complains of
intense nausea. Her abdomen is soft but distended and tympanitic to percussion. There is no
peritonitis or palpable masses.
B. Colon obstruction
C. Ovarian torsion
D. Food poisoning
The correct answer is A. Most patients with food poisoning have frequent emesis which
gradually becomes bilious and the abdomen is usually not distended. The most likely diagnosis
is small bowel obstruction due to adhesions from prior surgery. The patient’s symptoms and
physical exam suggest obstruction, with distension (which can be absent as well) and the
sudden onset of intermittent cramping pain (colic), associated with bilious emesis. Colon
obstruction is not caused by adhesions from prior surgery. Although ovarian torsion is possible,
the abdomen is not typically distended, and the pain is usually in the lower abdomen.
B. MRCP
C. Colonoscopy
D. Exploratory laparotomy
The correct answer is A. Abdominal X-rays are usually the best initial imaging modality. They
will likely demonstrate the small bowel obstruction, with proximal dilatation and distal
decompression. They are also helpful for identifying free air if it is present. MRCP is helpful in
assessing biliary and pancreatic anatomy and not appropriate in this setting. CT imaging is
effective in evaluating SBO and associated complications including ischemia, perforation,
mesenteric edema, and pneumatosis, which may prompt surgical interventions. There is no role
for colonoscopy in this setting. Patients with bowel obstructions may require surgery, but more
information is required in this scenario.
A. Surgical consultation
B. Bowel rest
D. Laxatives
E. A, B and C
The correct answer is E. The treatment for adhesive small bowel obstruction is bowel rest
(NPO), IVF administration and NG decompression. Surgery should be consulted early on when
the diagnosis is first being considered. Not all obstructed patients will require exploration. Most
are managed with bowel rest and decompression and will resolve without surgical intervention.
It is imperative that the surgeon is involved early in the care of any obstructed patient, as signs
of obstruction progressing to gangrenous bowel can sometimes be initially subtle. There is no
role for laxatives in patients with small bowel obstruction.
Case #4
An 80-year-old man with a history of atrial fibrillation presents with severe generalized
abdominal pain and confusion. Further history reveals that he has a history of hypertension,
chronic pulmonary disease from smoking, and diabetes. Earlier in the day, he began having
sudden severe abdominal pain. The pain continues to be severe and relentless and is
associated with nausea — described as diffuse and getting worse. Upon arrival to the
emergency room, he had a large, foul smelling, dark stool and was becoming more confused.
On exam, he is moaning in pain. He is in atrial fibrillation and is becoming hypotensive. He is
diaphoretic and only oriented to person and place. His abdomen is soft and not distended.
There are no obvious masses or peritonitis.
A. Ruptured appendicitis
D. Myocardial infarction
The correct answer is B. Acute mesenteric ischemia can be due to sudden occlusion of the
mesenteric blood vessels, likely sudden occlusion from an arterial thrombus. Atrial fibrillation
can cause dislodgement of a clot that originates in the heart that then embolizes to the
mesenteric vessels. Impaired blood flow leads to ischemia, necrosis, perforation, and eventual
sepsis. The diagnosis has to be suspected immediately. Patients typically have pain out of
proportion to physical exam. Because there is no pulsatile abdominal mass, ruptured AAA is not
likely. The patient has no history of chest pain or pressure making myocardial infarction unlikely.
Ruptured appendicitis typically presents with diffuse peritonitis and fever. Treatment needs to be
initiated early and aggressively. Immediate surgical consultation and ICU support along with
anticoagulants are necessary. The morbidity of this condition is very high, especially when
bowel necrosis, peritonitis, and multisystem organ failure have occurred. A mesenteric
angiogram can be done to delineate the occlusion in a chronic pain setting, but the diagnosis
should not be delayed.
Case #5
A 41-year-old woman presents with right upper quadrant abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting.
She had a baby three weeks ago and had a similar episode during her pregnancy after eating
some pizza, but it was short lived and never occurred again. The current pain developed about
thirty minutes after eating ice cream. The pain was severe and associated with nausea and a
non-bilious emesis. She has had no fever, weight loss, malaise or ill contacts. This attack again
began in the right upper quadrant but was much worse than the prior attack. She came to the
ER for evaluation, and after about an hour, the pain began to spontaneously get better. Physical
exam reveals a moderately obese woman with stable vital signs. Her abdominal exam is
normal.
A. Cholelithiasis
B. Choledocholithiasis
C. Cholecystitis
D. Gallstone pancreatitis
E. Cholangitis
The correct answer is A. Biliary colic describes the symptoms that develop when gallstones
intermittently obstruct the cystic duct. Typically patients present with severe, sudden onset of
right upper abdominal pain that may radiate to the epigastric area or the back shortly after fatty
meals. The symptoms will typically resolve spontaneously. Cholecystitis refers to obstruction of
the cystic duct which subsequently causes inflammation of the gallbladder. Sometimes the pain
is relentless and the patient may also have right upper quadrant abdominal tenderness
(Murphy’s sign), fever, nausea and vomiting. Choledocholithiasis refers to gallstones in the
common bile duct, and can be considered a complication of cholelithiasis. Patients will usually
have right upper quadrant pain, nausea, vomiting, jaundice and elevated liver enzymes.
Cholangitis refers to obstruction of the common bile duct and infection within the biliary tree.
This can be a life-threatening complication and is an emergency when identified. Gallstone
pancreatitis refers to pancreatitis caused by the passage of a gallstone that irritates the ampulla
of Vater causing subsequent pancreatitis.
B. CBC
C. Abdominal ultrasound
The correct answer is D. In addition to physical exam, liver function tests and amylase and
lipase levels can rule out obstructing stones. Patients who suffer from biliary colic typically have
normal laboratory values, but WBC elevation can be seen in patients with cholecystitis or
cholangitis. Those patients with choledocholithiasis or cholangitis can have elevation in liver
enzymes and bilirubin. Gallstone pancreatitis will be diagnosed with elevated amylase and
lipase levels. Abdominal ultrasound is essential to the diagnosis of all of the aforementioned
disease processes.
Case #6
A 16-year-old boy presents with fatigue, sore throat and severe left upper quadrant pain. He has
had a sore throat and fever (100.4 F) and been complaining of feeling very tired over the last
week. He has no history of recent travel or ill contacts. The left-sided abdominal pain started
about a week ago and has gotten worse. Nothing makes the pain better or worse, and the
patient has a hard time getting comfortable. The pain is constant and has always been located
in the left upper quadrant. The patient has never had surgery before. His bowel function is
normal, but he does feel full all the time which makes it hard for him to eat very much. Physical
exam reveals a tired appearing patient. Temperature is 100.1 F and other vital signs are normal.
There is abdominal fullness in the left upper quadrant with tenderness to palpation. He has
enlarged lymph nodes bilaterally in his neck. The remainder of the physical exam is normal.
A. Acute appendicitis
C. Splenomegaly
The correct answer is C. The history and physical exam suggest splenic enlargement, likely
related to an infection. Hypersplenism can occur in a number of disease states including
lymphoma and many viral illnesses. The patient’s symptoms of fever, fatigue, sore throat and
splenic enlargement suggest infection with Epstein-Barr virus (infectious mononucleosis). Acute
appendicitis is not likely to cause left upper quadrant pain and fullness, and colitis is not very
likely given the lack of bowel symptoms. A perforated gastric ulcer would present with
peritonitis.
Ultrasound of the abdomen can be easily performed to evaluate the enlarged spleen and rule
out a mass as a cause of the splenic enlargement. CBC can be performed as well as a
Monospot to specifically look for Mononucleosis.
Patients with splenomegaly should avoid contact sports or heavy lifting for several weeks to
avoid the unlikely but life threatening complication of splenic rupture and hemorrhage. Surgical
consultation should be obtained for any patient with splenomegaly suspected of rupture (sudden
worsening of pain, dizzy, fainting, tachycardia, distension).
Case #7
A 14-year-old boy presents with right lower quadrant pain, low grade fever and anorexia. His
mother reports that he was perfectly well until 12 hours ago when he began having a vague
centralized abdominal pain. He had an episode of non-bilious emesis after dinner, and tried to
go to sleep in order to feel better. He awoke in the middle of the night with severe right sided
abdominal pain. The patient’s mother brought him to the emergency room because he was
having a hard time walking. The patient complains of pain with any movement at all. He has no
ill contacts, recent travel or other symptoms. He has never had pain like this before. The pain is
now constant. Physical exam reveals an otherwise healthy boy. He has a temperature of 100.5
and is lying still on his side with his legs drawn up. His vital signs are normal. With difficulty he is
able to lie on his back. Abdominal exam reveals tenderness to palpation of the right lower
quadrant with rebound and involuntary guarding.
A. Acute appendicitis
B. Acute cholecystitis
D. Crohn’s ileitis
The correct answer is A. This patient was very healthy before the onset of these symptoms.
There are no bowel complaints and, therefore, Crohn’s disease is very unlikely. Acute
appendicitis will typically present with a sequence of signs and symptoms. These include
periumbilical pain, which is vague, poorly localized, and visceral in quality. The patient then
begins to develop nausea, anorexia and vomiting. The pain then begins to localize to the right
lower quadrant and localized tenderness develops. Not all patients present with classic signs
and symptoms depending on the location of the appendix. Acute cholecystitis presents with right
upper quadrant pain and is rare in children. UTI is a possibility, but less likely in the absence of
urinary symptoms.
C. Intravenous antibiotics
D. Surgical consultation
The correct answer is E. All of the listed choices have been utilized in the workup of acute
appendicitis. Ultrasound is typically preferred in children to limit ionizing radiation exposure.
Ultrasound sensitivity can be limited and operator depended as the appendix may not always be
visualized. CT scan is the imaging test of choice in adults. MRI can also be used to confirm the
diagnosis but is costly and time consuming. Ultimately, the choice of imaging is dependent on
physician preference, hospital resources, and degree of clinical suspicion, pregnancy status,
and cost considerations. Usually, a white blood cell count will be obtained and in most patients,
it will be elevated. A very high white cell count may suggest gangrenous or perforated
appendicitis. Urinalysis will frequently show microscopic hematuria. Intravenous antibiotics
should be started when the diagnosis of appendicitis is made. It is important to obtain prompt
surgical consultation when the diagnosis is suspected, as further imaging may not be needed if
clinical history and physical examination suggest the diagnosis.
A. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
B. Intravenous antibiotics
C. Laparoscopic appendectomy
D. No treatment indicated
The correct answer is C. Removal of the appendix (usually laparoscopically) remains the
treatment of choice for acute appendicitis. Recently, there is literature to suggest that some
patients may be successfully treated with antibiotics alone. Treatment of ruptured appendicitis is
more complex and can range from simple appendectomy to drainage of an abscess (if present)
with antibiotics.
Case #8
A 20 year old woman presents with sudden onset of right lower quadrant pain and emesis.
Discussion:
Further history reveals that the patient was perfectly well until the sudden development of right
lower quadrant abdominal pain. The pain is described as constant and getting worse. The
patient has had no fever and had one episode of emesis upon arrival to the emergency room.
No significant past medical history and the patient has never had surgery. She takes no
medication and had her last menstrual cycle two weeks ago. Physical exam reveals a patient in
distress from the pain. She is tachycardic, but her other vital signs are normal and there is no
fever. It is hard for her to get comfortable for the examination. Abdominal exam reveals
discomfort in the bilateral lower quadrants. The remainder of the exam is normal.
A. Acute appendicitis
C. Ovarian torsion
D. Ectopic pregnancy
F. B, C and D
The correct answer is F. Acute appendicitis is unlikely in this clinical scenario as discussed
above. In women, ovarian pathology has to be considered in the differential of abdominal pain. It
is possible that a ruptured ovarian cyst or ovarian torsion can present with right lower quadrant
pain as described. An ectopic pregnancy can also present this way, although a ruptured ectopic
pregnancy is an emergency due to hemorrhage, and patients frequently present with abdomen
or pelvic pain with signs of shock.
A. Pregnancy test
C. CBC
D. Pelvic examination
The correct answer is E. A pregnancy test which is negative effectively rules out the risk of
ectopic pregnancy. Ultrasound of the pelvis is critically important to obtain. After about six
weeks from the last menstrual period in a pregnant woman, the fetus should be visualized in the
uterus. If the pregnancy test is positive and no fetus is in the uterus, an ectopic is suspected.
Ultrasound is also important to evaluate the ovaries. Ultrasound will identify a mass or cyst if
present, and can make the diagnosis of ovarian torsion if no blood flow is reliably identified to
the ovary. A CBC can be helpful if bleeding or infection is suspected.
Both ectopic pregnancy and ovarian torsion are surgical emergencies. Surgical consultation
should be obtained immediately if either diagnosis is suspected. A delay in surgical intervention
can result in loss of the ovary or death of the patient from exsanguination if rupture of the
ectopic occurs. Ruptured ovarian cyst without torsion can often be managed without surgery
using pain medication. Sometimes large cysts require removal if pain continues, if torsion
cannot be ruled out, or if tumor is suspected.
Case #9
A 72-year-old woman presents with left lower quadrant abdominal pain, nausea and fever. She
reports that the pain started about two weeks ago and is getting worse and is constant. The pain
is generalized, but worse in the left lower quadrant of the abdomen. She reports associated
nausea and had one episode of non-bilious emesis. She has also noted some changes in her
stool frequency, as has felt constipated over this same period despite passing flatus. She feels
very bloated and is not interested in eating. The patient has been a smoker for a long time. She
takes ibuprofen daily for her chronic knee pain. Her physical exam shows an obese woman who
is tachycardic and febrile to 101.5. Her blood pressure is normal and she is oriented to person,
place and time. She has left lower quadrant tenderness and appears unwell.
A. Diverticulitis
B. Sigmoid volvulus
C. Bladder infection
D. Acute appendicitis
The correct answer is A. Diverticula form in the colon when outpouchings of colon mucosa
protrude through the muscular wall. This is very common and the risk increases with age.
Obesity, smoking, straining at stools and a sedentary lifestyle are risks for diverticular formation.
Diverticular disease is most common in the sigmoid colon. Diverticulitis is inflammation of
diverticula that can lead to perforation and peritonitis. Sigmoid volvulus is a large bowel
obstruction due to twisting of the sigmoid colon. Patients typically present with abdominal pain,
distention, and obstipation. Bladder infection is less likely in this instance as the patient has no
dysuria. Acute appendicitis has a similar presentation, but with pain in the right lower quadrant.
A. Colonoscopy
B. CBC
C. Stool samples
E. B and D
The correct answer is E. Colonoscopy is not safe to consider in patients with acute
diverticulitis. Insufflation of the colon with air can cause perforation or worsen infection. Stool
samples are not useful to direct therapy. A CBC will likely show an elevated WBC, consistent
with inflammation/infection. CT of the abdomen and pelvis will make the diagnosis and can give
additional information about the severity of the diverticulitis (such as abscess or perforation).
Many patients with diverticulitis can be managed non-operatively with antibiotics. For patients
that present in shock, or with signs of perforation or abscess on imaging, prompt surgical
consultation should be obtained. Surgical treatment can range from abscess drainage to colon
resection with colostomy (Hartmann operation).
Case #10
A 3-day-old full term baby boy presents with sudden onset of bilious emesis, generalized
abdominal pain and fussiness. The mother reports that the child has been perfectly healthy until
suddenly developing two episodes of bilious emesis. The baby was born at term and has been
passing stools regularly. He is now very fussy and seems to have generalized abdominal pain.
He refuses to eat. On physical exam, he is tachycardic and afebrile. He has a large bilious
emesis while you are examining him and seems uncomfortable. His abdomen seems soft and
not distended. The remainder of the exam is normal.
A. Intestinal intussusception
B. Formula intolerance
C. Pyloric stenosis
The correct answer is D. Although intussusception can cause fussiness and emesis, bilious
emesis is a red flag. Malrotation with midgut volvulus is the diagnosis until proven otherwise.
Pyloric stenosis is more common in boys, but does not present with bilious emesis. Formula
intolerance usually causes fussiness or emesis, but not bilious emesis.
A. UGI
B. Barium enema
C. Abdominal X-ray
D. Abdominal CT scan
The correct answer is A. Although abdominal X-rays are frequently done, they are not reliable
for making the diagnosis of malrotation with midgut volvulus. The X-rays can appear normal
even in the case of obstruction. Barium enema is not indicated in this instance, as it does not
make the diagnosis of duodenal malrotation with volvulus. The immediate workup required is an
UGI, which will show the malrotated duodenum and the associated volvulus. If the patient is
also presenting with acidosis and bloody stools, the UGI can be skipped and the baby taken
emergently to the operating room. These findings are worrisome for intestinal necrosis.
A. Upper endoscopy
The correct answer is C. Malrotation with midgut volvulus is a true surgical emergency.
Surgical consultation needs to be obtained immediately if the diagnosis is being considered.
After establishing IV access and placing an NG for decompression, an exploratory laparotomy is
performed and the twisted bowel is detorsed and the retroperitoneal bands and released.
Failure to quickly treat the volvulus can result in loss of the entire small bowel, which is fatal.
This procedure is known as a Ladd’s procedure, and also involves removing the appendix at the
same time.
Case #11
A 9-month-old baby presents with an upper respiratory tract infection, abdominal pain, fussiness
and bloody stools. He is an otherwise perfectly healthy baby who began having symptoms
about six hours ago. He does not want to eat and seems very uncomfortable. He has had an
episode of non-bilious emesis. There are periods of time when he screams uncontrollably and
draws his legs up. When the pain wave passes, he is lethargic and appears exhausted.
Recently he was noted to pass red, gelatinous (currant jelly) stools from below. He has had an
upper respiratory tract infection for the past few days, but is otherwise very healthy. Physical
exam reveals a well-nourished appearing 9-month-old baby. He is fussy but has normal vital
signs. He has some residual nasal secretions but his lungs are clear. The abdominal exam is
significant for distension, with a palpable right-sided abdominal mass, which is tender to deep
palpation. Rectal exam shows bloody, gelatinous stool.
A. Pyloric stenosis
B. Ileocolic intussusception
The correct answer is B. The above patient is presenting with classic signs and symptoms of
ileocolic intussusception. The colicky pattern of abdominal pain and currant jelly stools in a
previously healthy nine-month-old infant makes the diagnosis very likely, especially given the
palpable abdominal mass. Milk protein allergy may present with bright blood in the stool and
diarrhea but not the symptoms as described.
D. Surgery
The correct answer is E. Often X-rays of the abdomen are obtained first. These can be very
helpful, especially in the case of this infant with a palpable abdominal mass. Plain films may
show paucity of gas in the right abdomen, due to the mass. If plain films strongly suggest
intussusception, a contrast enema with attempted reduction can be considered as the next step.
In many cases, clinical providers and radiologists will confirm the ileocolic intussusception with
an abdominal ultrasound when the diagnosis is in question. If an intussusception is present, it
will appear as a target sign on ultrasound. With a palpable mass and an X-ray that is consistent
with intussusception, ultrasound is not needed. The definitive diagnostic and therapeutic
modality is barium or air enema. Either fluoroscopic technique is used to visualize and attempt
to reduce the intussuscepted bowel in a retrograde manner. Those patients who either present
with peritonitis or for whom reduction does not work will then need surgery for reduction or
resection of the intussusception. Surgical consultation should be promptly obtained prior to
enema reduction attempt.
REFERENCES
1. Breum BM, Rud B, Kirkegaard T, Nordentoft T. Accuracy of abdominal auscultation for bowel
obstruction. World journal of gastroenterology. 2015;21(34):10018-24.
doi:10.3748/wjg.v21.i34.10018.
2. Felder S, Margel D, Murrell Z, Fleshner P. Usefulness of bowel sound auscultation: a prospective
evaluation. Journal of surgical education. 2014;71(5):768-73. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.02.003.
3. Read TE, Brozovich M, Andujar JE, Ricciardi R, Caushaj PF. Bowel Sounds Are Not Associated
With Flatus, Bowel Movement, or Tolerance of Oral Intake in Patients After Major Abdominal
Surgery. Diseases of the colon and rectum. 2017;60(6):608-13.
doi:10.1097/dcr.0000000000000829.
4. Shrestha MP, Borgstrom M, Trowers E. Digital Rectal Examination Reduces Hospital Admissions,
Endoscopies, and Medical Therapy in Patients with Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding. The
American journal of medicine. 2017;130(7):819-25. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.01.036.
5. Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and
appendectomy in the United States. American journal of epidemiology. 1990;132(5):910-25.
6. Bhangu A, Soreide K, Di Saverio S, Assarsson JH, Drake FT. Acute appendicitis: modern
understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet (London, England).
2015;386(10000):1278-87. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00275-5.
7. Simillis C, Symeonides P, Shorthouse AJ, Tekkis PP. A meta-analysis comparing conservative
treatment versus acute appendectomy for complicated appendicitis (abscess or phlegmon).
Surgery. 2010;147(6):818-29. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2009.11.013.
8. Podda M, Cillara N, Di Saverio S, Lai A, Feroci F, Luridiana G et al. Antibiotics-first strategy for
uncomplicated acute appendicitis in adults is associated with increased rates of peritonitis at
surgery. A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing
appendectomy and non-operative management with antibiotics. The surgeon : journal of the
Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland. 2017;15(5):303-14.
doi:10.1016/j.surge.2017.02.001.
9. Demehri FR, Alam HB. Evidence-Based Management of Common Gallstone-Related
Emergencies. Journal of intensive care medicine. 2016;31(1):3-13.
doi:10.1177/0885066614554192.
10. Strasberg SM. Clinical practice. Acute calculous cholecystitis. The New England journal of
medicine. 2008;358(26):2804-11. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp0800929.
11. Singer AJ, McCracken G, Henry MC, Thode HC, Jr., Cabahug CJ. Correlation among clinical,
laboratory, and hepatobiliary scanning findings in patients with suspected acute cholecystitis.
Annals of emergency medicine. 1996;28(3):267-72.
12. Isenmann R, Runzi M, Kron M, Kahl S, Kraus D, Jung N et al. Prophylactic antibiotic treatment in
patients with predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a placebo-controlled, double-blind trial.
Gastroenterology. 2004;126(4):997-1004.
13. van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ, Hofker HS, Boermeester MA, Dejong CH et al. A
step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis. The New England journal of
medicine. 2010;362(16):1491-502. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0908821.
14. Chey WD, Wong BC. American College of Gastroenterology guideline on the management of
Helicobacter pylori infection. The American journal of gastroenterology. 2007;102(8):1808-25.
doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01393.x.
15. Chey WD, Leontiadis GI, Howden CW, Moss SF. ACG Clinical Guideline: Treatment of
Helicobacter pylori Infection. The American journal of gastroenterology. 2017;112(2):212-39.
doi:10.1038/ajg.2016.563.
16. Wong CW, Chung PH, Tam PK, Wong KK. Laparoscopic versus open operation for perforated
peptic ulcer in pediatric patients: A 10-year experience. Journal of pediatric surgery.
2015;50(12):2038-40. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.08.025.
17. Klarenbeek BR, de Korte N, van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA. Review of current classifications for
diverticular disease and a translation into clinical practice. International journal of colorectal
disease. 2012;27(2):207-14. doi:10.1007/s00384-011-1314-5.
18. Swanson SM, Strate LL. Acute Colonic Diverticulitis. Annals of internal medicine.
2018;168(9):Itc65-itc80. doi:10.7326/aitc201805010.
19. Richter JE. Surgery for reflux disease: reflections of a gastroenterologist. The New England
journal of medicine. 1992;326(12):825-7. doi:10.1056/nejm199203193261209.
20. Giannini EG, Zentilin P, Dulbecco P, Vigneri S, Scarlata P, Savarino V. Management strategy for
patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a comparison between empirical treatment with
esomeprazole and endoscopy-oriented treatment. The American journal of gastroenterology.
2008;103(2):267-75. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01659.x.
21. Katz PO. Medical therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease in 2007. Reviews in
gastroenterological disorders. 2007;7(4):193-203.
22. Nissen R, Rossetti M, Siewert R. [20 years in the management of reflux disease using
fundoplication]. Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen. 1977;48(10):
634-9.
23. El-Serag HB. Time trends of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Clinical
gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American
Gastroenterological Association. 2007;5(1):17-26. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2006.09.016.
24. Grant AM, Cotton SC, Boachie C, Ramsay CR, Krukowski ZH, Heading RC et al. Minimal access
surgery compared with medical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: five year
follow-up of a randomised controlled trial (REFLUX). BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2013;346:f1908.
doi:10.1136/bmj.f1908.
25. Zhang H, Dong D, Liu Z, He S, Hu L, Lv Y. Revaluation of the efficacy of magnetic sphincter
augmentation for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surgical endoscopy.
2016;30(9):3684-90. doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4701-0.
26. Feagan BG, Lemann M, Befrits R, Connell W, D'Haens G, Ghosh S et al. Recommendations for
the treatment of Crohn's disease with tumor necrosis factor antagonists: an expert consensus
report. Inflammatory bowel diseases. 2012;18(1):152-60. doi:10.1002/ibd.21870.
27. Kornbluth A, Sachar DB. Ulcerative colitis practice guidelines in adults: American College Of
Gastroenterology, Practice Parameters Committee. The American journal of gastroenterology.
2010;105(3):501-23; quiz 24. doi:10.1038/ajg.2009.727.
28. Rodrigues FG, Dasilva G, Wexner SD. Neutropenic enterocolitis. World journal of
gastroenterology. 2017;23(1):42-7. doi:10.3748/wjg.v23.i1.42.
29. Cohen SH, Gerding DN, Johnson S, Kelly CP, Loo VG, McDonald LC et al. Clinical practice
guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the society for healthcare
epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the infectious diseases society of America (IDSA). Infection
control and hospital epidemiology. 2010;31(5):431-55. doi:10.1086/651706.
30. Debast SB, Bauer MP, Kuijper EJ. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious
Diseases: update of the treatment guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection. Clinical
microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2014;20 Suppl 2:1-26. doi:10.1111/1469-0691.12418.
31. Taylor MR, Lalani N. Adult small bowel obstruction. Academic emergency medicine : official
journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. 2013;20(6):528-44.
doi:10.1111/acem.12150.
32. Menzies D, Ellis H. Intestinal obstruction from adhesions--how big is the problem? Annals of the
Royal College of Surgeons of England. 1990;72(1):60-3.
33. Hasnain SQ, Ahmed M. Intestinal obstruction in adults at the Aga Khan University Hospital. JPMA
The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 1994;44(6):143-5.
34. Markogiannakis H, Messaris E, Dardamanis D, Pararas N, Tzertzemelis D, Giannopoulos P et al.
Acute mechanical bowel obstruction: clinical presentation, etiology, management and outcome.
World journal of gastroenterology. 2007;13(3):432-7.
35. Di Saverio S, Coccolini F, Galati M, Smerieri N, Biffl WL, Ansaloni L et al. Bologna guidelines for
diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2013 update of the
evidence-based guidelines from the world society of emergency surgery ASBO working group.
World journal of emergency surgery : WJES. 2013;8(1):42. doi:10.1186/1749-7922-8-42.
36. Azagury D, Liu RC, Morgan A, Spain DA. Small bowel obstruction: A practical step-by-step
evidence-based approach to evaluation, decision making, and management. The journal of
trauma and acute care surgery. 2015;79(4):661-8. doi:10.1097/ta.0000000000000824.
37. Somwaru AS, Philips S. Imaging of Uncommon Causes of Large-Bowel Obstruction. AJR
American journal of roentgenology. 2017;209(5):W277-w86. doi:10.2214/ajr.16.17621.
38. Pujahari AK. Decision Making in Bowel Obstruction: A Review. Journal of clinical and diagnostic
research : JCDR. 2016;10(11):Pe07-pe12. doi:10.7860/jcdr/2016/22170.8923.
39. Atukorale YN, Church JL, Hoggan BL, Lambert RS, Gurgacz SL, Goodall S et al. Self-Expanding
Metallic Stents for the Management of Emergency Malignant Large Bowel Obstruction: a
Systematic Review. Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery
of the Alimentary Tract. 2016;20(2):455-62. doi:10.1007/s11605-015-2997-7.
40. Poulin EC, Mamazza J, Schlachta CM. Splenic artery embolization before laparoscopic
splenectomy. An update. Surgical endoscopy. 1998;12(6):870-5.
41. Weaver H, Kumar V, Spencer K, Maatouk M, Malik S. Spontaneous splenic rupture: A rare life-
threatening condition; Diagnosed early and managed successfully. The American journal of case
reports. 2013;14:13-5. doi:10.12659/ajcr.883739.
42. Mamode N, Pickford I, Leiberman P. Failure to improve outcome in acute mesenteric ischaemia:
seven-year review. The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica. 1999;165(3):203-8.
doi:10.1080/110241599750007054.
43. Aschoff AJ, Stuber G, Becker BW, Hoffmann MH, Schmitz BL, Schelzig H et al. Evaluation of
acute mesenteric ischemia: accuracy of biphasic mesenteric multi-detector CT angiography.
Abdominal imaging. 2009;34(3):345-57. doi:10.1007/s00261-008-9392-8.
44. Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE, Chute EP, Littooy FN, Bandyk D et al. Prevalence and
associations of abdominal aortic aneurysm detected through screening. Aneurysm Detection and
Management (ADAM) Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. Annals of internal medicine.
1997;126(6):441-9.
45. Fielding JW, Black J, Ashton F, Slaney G, Campbell DJ. Diagnosis and management of 528
abdominal aortic aneurysms. British medical journal (Clinical research ed). 1981;283(6287):
355-9.
46. Marston WA, Ahlquist R, Johnson G, Jr., Meyer AA. Misdiagnosis of ruptured abdominal aortic
aneurysms. Journal of vascular surgery. 1992;16(1):17-22.
47. Daly KJ, Torella F, Ashleigh R, McCollum CN. Screening, diagnosis and advances in aortic
aneurysm surgery. Gerontology. 2004;50(6):349-59. doi:10.1159/000080172.
48. Pearce WH, Zarins CK, Bacharach JM. Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Symposium
II: controversies in abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Circulation. 2008;118(25):2860-3.
doi:10.1161/circulationaha.108.191176.
49. Eliason JL, Upchurch GR, Jr. Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Circulation.
2008;117(13):1738-44. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.107.747923.
50. Stein JC, Wang R, Adler N, Boscardin J, Jacoby VL, Won G et al. Emergency physician
ultrasonography for evaluating patients at risk for ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Annals of
emergency medicine. 2010;56(6):674-83. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.06.563.
51. Hoover KW, Tao G, Kent CK. Trends in the diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy in the
United States. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2010;115(3):495-502.
doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d0c328.
52. Practice Bulletin No. 174: Evaluation and Management of Adnexal Masses. Obstetrics and
gynecology. 2016;128(5):e210-e26. doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000001768.
53. Hall PM. Nephrolithiasis: treatment, causes, and prevention. Cleveland Clinic journal of medicine.
2009;76(10):583-91. doi:10.3949/ccjm.76a.09043.
54. Ta A, D'Arcy FT, Hoag N, D'Arcy JP, Lawrentschuk N. Testicular torsion and the acute scrotum:
current emergency management. European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the
European Society for Emergency Medicine. 2016;23(3):160-5.
doi:10.1097/mej.0000000000000303.
55. Lee HC, Pickard SS, Sridhar S, Dutta S. Intestinal malrotation and catastrophic volvulus in
infancy. The Journal of emergency medicine. 2012;43(1):e49-51.
doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.06.135.
56. Skinner MA, Grosfeld JL. Inguinal and umbilical hernia repair in infants and children. The Surgical
clinics of North America. 1993;73(3):439-49.
57. Belknap WM. Hirschsprung's Disease. Current treatment options in gastroenterology.
2003;6(3):247-56.
58. Peters B, Oomen MW, Bakx R, Benninga MA. Advances in infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.
Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology. 2014;8(5):533-41.
doi:10.1586/17474124.2014.903799.
59. Sola JE, Neville HL. Laparoscopic vs open pyloromyotomy: a systematic review and meta-
analysis. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2009;44(8):1631-7. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.04.001.
60. Mahida JB, Asti L, Deans KJ, Minneci PC, Groner JI. Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy decreases
postoperative length of stay in children with hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Journal of pediatric
surgery. 2016;51(9):1436-9. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.05.006.
61. Litz CN, Amankwah EK, Polo RL, Sakmar KA, Danielson PD, Chandler NM. Outpatient
management of intussusception: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of pediatric
surgery. 2018. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.09.019.
62. St-Vil D, Brandt ML, Panic S, Bensoussan AL, Blanchard H. Meckel's diverticulum in children: a
20-year review. Journal of pediatric surgery. 1991;26(11):1289-92.
63. Gezer HO, Temiz A, Ince E, Ezer SS, Hasbay B, Hicsonmez A. Meckel diverticulum in children:
Evaluation of macroscopic appearance for guidance in subsequent surgery. Journal of pediatric
surgery. 2016;51(7):1177-80. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.08.066.
64. Kellogg ND. Evaluation of suspected child physical abuse. Pediatrics. 2007;119(6):1232-41.
doi:10.1542/peds.2007-0883.
65. Christian CW. The evaluation of suspected child physical abuse. Pediatrics. 2015;135(5):e1337-
54. doi:10.1542/peds.2015-0356.
AUTHOR
Leonard K. Welsh, MD
Duke University, Durham, NC