Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
47 views34 pages

Pile/Shaft Load Testing Axial Pile/Shaft-Soil Transfer Axial Pile Nominal Resistance

The document discusses various methods for pile and shaft load testing, including conventional top-down tests and statnamic testing, detailing procedures and standards such as ASTM 1143-81. It also covers strain measurement techniques and the evaluation of pile capacity using methods like Davisson's and Debeer's, highlighting differences in capacity estimates. The summary of findings indicates that Debeer provides the lowest estimates while Fuller Hoy gives the highest, with Davisson's method being adopted by FDOT for specific pile sizes.

Uploaded by

abcdef456
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
47 views34 pages

Pile/Shaft Load Testing Axial Pile/Shaft-Soil Transfer Axial Pile Nominal Resistance

The document discusses various methods for pile and shaft load testing, including conventional top-down tests and statnamic testing, detailing procedures and standards such as ASTM 1143-81. It also covers strain measurement techniques and the evaluation of pile capacity using methods like Davisson's and Debeer's, highlighting differences in capacity estimates. The summary of findings indicates that Debeer provides the lowest estimates while Fuller Hoy gives the highest, with Davisson's method being adopted by FDOT for specific pile sizes.

Uploaded by

abcdef456
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 34

Lecture 2

Pile/Shaft Load Testing


Axial Pile/Shaft-Soil Transfer
Axial Pile Nominal Resistance
Conventional Top Down Load Testing -
1000 tons (FDOT)& 4,000 tons (CaTrans)

Pile Top Load


Pile Head Displacement
Conventional Top-Down Pile/Shaft Load Test

• Two most common are slow & quick maintained tests (see
ASTM 1143-81)
• Slow Maintained:
– Load the pile in 8 equal increments (25%, 50%, 75%, 100%, 125%,
175% and 200% of the design service load
– Maintain each increment until the rate of settlement has decreased to
0.01 in/hr, but not longer than 2 hrs
– Maintain the 200% load for 24 hrs
– After the required holding time, remove the load in decrements of
25% with 1 hr between steps
– After loading as above, reload pile to test load in 50% increments of
design load, allowing 20 mins between load increments.
– Then increase the load in increments of 10% of design load until
failure, allowing 20 mins between load steps.
FHWA Pile Load Test
• Quick Maintained – Recommended by FHWA (3 – 5
hrs)
– Load the pile in 20 increments to 300% of the design load
(i.e. each increment is 15% of design load)
– Maintain each load for 5 mins with readings taken every
2.5 mins.
– After reaching 300% - hold load for 5 mins and then
remove the load in in 4 equal decrements (each 75% of
design) with 5 mins between decrements
– Because of the quickness of the test, it is not generally
recommended for settlement estimations – considered an
undrained loading scenario
Strain Gage
Internal Technology (EDC):

Accelerometer
NHI 9.5.2
I-95 at Edgewood
Static Pile Load Test
Strain Measurement Comparison
350

Pile Top
300

250

200
Strain (ue)

150

100

50
Pile Tip
0

-50
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 13000
Time (seconds)
Level 1 B Average Level 2 Average Level 5 EDC Top Strain EDC Toe Strain
Force from Strain (NHI)
I-95 at Edgewood
Load Test Pile
Load versus Displacement

0.0

-0.2

-0.4

-0.6
Displacement (inches)

-0.8

-1.0

-1.2

-1.4

-1.6

O Ring Failure, Test Stopped


-1.8
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
Load (kips)

AVERAGE DISPLACEMENT FDOT Failure Criteria FDOT Failure Criteria 2


Statnamic Testing

5’ drilled shaft, 1300


Tons, Keystone
Heights, Florida,
2013
Statnamic Testing:
6000 tons ASTM Standard D7383-08
Max. Statnamic Force Unloading Point (v = 0)
Load
(Fstatnamc ) Yielding
(Fstatic = F unloading)

Time
Time Reaction
Masses
Laser sight
Load Cell / Fuel (movement)
Displacement

Velocity
(v )
Time Skin Friction

Acceleration
End Bearing
(a)
Time
Statnamic Data Reduction Middendorp
Unloading Point Method (1992) – NHI 11.4.1

2. Fstatnamic = Fstatic + C×v + M×a (C: damping factor, v: velocity, M: mass,


a: acceleration, therefore C×v: damping force, M×a: inertial force), see Figure 3.6.
3. At the maximum displacement (Unloading Point), the velocity equals zero (v = 0).
4. At the Unloading Point, since Fstatnamic and the acceleration are known (measured by
devices), Fstatic can be calculated.
Fstatic = Fstatnamic – M×a, (v = 0 at the Unloading Point)
5. It is assumed that the soil is yielding over the range Fstatnamic(max) to Funloading , so Fstatic =
Funloading.
Funloading = Fstatnamic – M×a --------------------------------- from step 4
6. Since Fstatic is known (Fstatic = Funloading) over the range Fstatnamic(max) to Funloading, a mean C
(damping factor) can be calculated over this range.
C×v = (Fstatnamic - Fstatic - M×a) ------------------------------ from step 2
Cmean = (Fstatnamic – Funloading - M×a) / v --------------------- from step 5
7. Now static resistance Fstatic can be calculated at all points.
Fstatic = (Fstatnamic - Cmean×v - M×a)
8. Draw the static load-movement diagram, shown in Figure 3.5.
Dynamic and Static Axial Pile/Shaft
Response
Load

Statnamic

Static
Movement

Zero velocity point


Osterberg Load Testing:
ASTM D 1143
30,000 tons
278 MN
10’ diameter shaft
Korea
Osterberg
Multiple Cell-
Upper O-cell

Lower O-cell

Stage Testing Physical Arrangement

Now called Bi- Side Shear


Failure Upper portion side

directional load
resistance is obtained.

Locked Active
Bearing resistance
is obtained.

test Bearing Failure


Locked

Step 1 Step 2

Lower portion side


Lower portion side resistance is obtained
resistance is obtained. (reverse order).

Open Active
Side Shear Side Shear Failure
Failure (Reverse Direction)
Active Open

Step 3 Step 4
Use of Telltales
Measurements At Cell Location
Measurements Along Pile/Shaft
Q P1

δ Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
fs Per ∆L

ε1 E A = P1 P2
∆L Vertical Force Equilibrium
z
ε2 E A = P2
fs Σ Fv = P1 – P2 – fs Per ∆L
ε3 E A = P3
∆P = fs Per ∆L
Depth, Z

∆P/∆z = dP/dz = fs Per

fs = dP/dL (1/Per)
εt E A = Pt fs = τ
Side
Friction
(stress)

Displacement, z
Pile Top Load -Displacement

Top displacement, δ fs = τ

Top Load, Q (tons)


Displacement, z

fs = τ

Displacement, z
fs = τ

Displacement, z
Top displacement, δ
fs = τ

Displacement, z
fs = τ

Displacement, z
Other Reason to do Load Tests?
NHI:

Measured &
Predicted
Rn - Pile Capacity – UF study 1986
Davisson’s Method
Davisson’s Method
P

L A

P ∆
= σ = Eε = E
A L
AE∆
P=
L

K
NHI 9.2.3

Qdav = Rn
FDOT
X = 0.15 + B/120
B < 30”

B ≥ 30”
X = 0.15 + B/30
Debeer’s Method
Qdebeer = Rn
Log – Log Plots
Y = a X3

Log Y = Log (a X3) = Log (a) + Log( X3)


Log Y = Log (a) + 3 Log (X)
Log (Load)

Slope = 3 = power of polynomial

Log (a)

Log (Displacement)
Pile Load Transfer
Total Pile Resistance
Load (tons, kN, etc.)

High Order Polynomial


e.g. 3rd to 5th

=
Qs – Side Friction on Pile

+ Low Order Polynomial


e.g. 2nd - quadratic
controls Qtip -- Tip Resistance

Pile Top Displacement (inch, mm)


Tip Resistance

Skin Friction
Pile
Capacity
Fuller Hoy - Graphical

QFH = Rn
FDOT Database
Summary of Rn Estimates
• Debeer – Lowest estimate of pile capacity –
predominately skin friction mobilization
• Fuller Hoy – Highest estimate of pile capacity due to
slope (1ton/0.05”)
• Davisson falls in between --- adopted by FDOT &
AASHTO for piles less than 30”(e.g. 24”) for piles of
30” or greater – PL/AE +X (0.15 +B/30) –
deformations are considered tolerable (i.e. less than
2”)
• At capacity (i.e. Davisson) – pile still has reserve
resistance --- peak is called ultimate and
accompanied by significant deformations

You might also like