Mating system

A mating system is a way in which a group is structured in relation to sexual behaviour. The precise meaning depends upon the
context. With respect to animals, the term describes which males and females mate under which circumstances. Recognised
systems include monogamy, polygamy (which includes polygyny, polyandry, and polygynandry), and promiscuity, all of which
lead to different mate choice outcomes and thus these systems affect how sexual selection works in the species which practice
them. In plants, the term refers to the degree and circumstances of outcrossing. In human sociobiology, the terms have been
extended to encompass the formation of relationships such as marriage.

Contents
In plants
In animals
In humans
In microorganisms
Bacteria
Archaea
Protists
Viruses
See also
References
Further reading

In plants
The primary mating systems in plants are outcrossing (cross-fertilisation), autogamy (self-fertilisation) and apomixis (asexual
reproduction without fertilization, but only when arising by modification of sexual function). Mixed mating systems, in which
plants use two or even all three mating systems, are not uncommon.[1]

A number of models have been used to describe the parameters of plant mating systems. The basic model is the mixed mating
model, which is based on the assumption that every fertilisation is either self-fertilisation or completely random cross-
fertilisation. More complex models relax this assumption; for example, the effective selfing model recognises that mating may be
more common between pairs of closely related plants than between pairs of distantly related plants.[1]

In animals
The following are some of the mating systems generally recognized in animals:

Monogamy: One male and one female have an exclusive mating relationship. The term "pair bonding" often
implies this. This is associated with one-male, one-female group compositions. There are two types of
monogamy: type 1, which is facultative, and type 2, which is obligate. Facultative monogamy occurs when there
are very low densities in a species. This means that mating occurs with only a single member of the opposite sex
because males and females are very far apart. When a female needs aid from conspecifics in order to have a
litter this is obligate monogamy. However, with this, the habitat carrying capacity is small so it means only one
female can breed within the habitat.[2]
Polygamy: Three types are recognized:
 Polygyny (the most common polygamous mating system in
vertebrates so far studied): One male has an exclusive
relationship with two or more females. This is associated with
one-male, multi-female group compositions. Many perennial
Vespula squamosa (southern yellowjacket) colonies are
polygynous.[3] Different types of polygyny exist, such as lek
polygyny and resource defense polygyny. Grayling butterflies
(Hipparchia semele) engage in resource defense polygyny,
where females choose a territorial male based on the best
oviposition site.[4] Although most animals opt for only one of
these strategies, some exhibit hybrid strategies, such as the
bee species, Xylocopa micans.[5]
Polyandry: One female has an exclusive relationship with two Chimpanzees have a promiscuous
or more males. This is very rare and is associated with multi-
mating system
male, multi-female group compositions. Genetic polyandry is
found some insect species such as Apis mellifera (the
Western Honey Bee), in which a virgin queen will mate with
multiple drones during her nuptial flight whereas each drone
will die immediately upon mating once. The queen will then
store the sperm collected from these multiple matings in her
spermatheca to use to fertilize eggs throughout the course of
her entire reproductive life.
Polygynandry: Polygynandry is a slight variation of this,
where two or more males have an exclusive relationship with
two or more females; the numbers of males and females
don't have to be equal, and in vertebrate species studied so
far, the number of males is usually less. This is associated
with multi-male, multi-female group compositions.
Promiscuity: A member of one sex within the social group mates
with any member of the opposite sex. This is associated with Male and female gorilla, gorillas have a
multi-male, multi-female group compositions. polygynous mating system
These mating relationships may or may not be associated with social
relationships, in which the sexual partners stay together to become parenting
partners. As the alternative term "pair bonding" implies, this is usual in monogamy. In many polyandrous systems, the males and
the female stay together to rear the young. In polygynous systems where the number of females paired with each male is low and
the male will often stay with one female to help rear the young, while the other females rear their young on their own. In
polygynandry, each of the males may assist one female; if all adults help rear all the young, the system is more usually called
"communal breeding". In highly polygynous systems, and in promiscuous systems, paternal care of young is rare, or there may be
no parental care at all.

These descriptions are idealized, and the social partnerships are often easier to observe than the mating relationships. In
particular:

the relationships are rarely exclusive for all individuals in a species. DNA fingerprinting studies have shown that
even in pair-bonding, matings outside the pair (extra-pair copulations) occur with fair frequency, and a significant
minority of offspring result from them. However, the offspring that are a result of extra-pair copulations usually
exhibit more advantageous genes. These genes can be associated with improvements in appearance, mating,
and the functioning of internal body systems.[6][7]
some species show different mating systems in different circumstances, for example in different parts of their
geographical range, or under different conditions of food availability
mixtures of the simple systems described above may occur.
Sexual conflict occurs between individuals of different sexes that have separate or conflicting requirements for optimal mating
success. This conflict may lead to competitive adaptations and co-adaptations of one or both of the sexes to maintain mating
processes that are beneficial to that sex.[8][9] Intralocus sexual conflict and interlocus sexual conflict describe the genetic
influence behind sexual conflict, and are presently recognized as the most basic forms of sexual conflict.[9]
In humans
Compared to other vertebrates, where a species usually has a single mating system, human display great variety. Humans also
differ by having formal marriages which in some cultures involve negotiation and arrangement between elder relatives.
Regarding sexual dimorphism (see the section about animals above), humans are in the intermediate group with moderate sex
differences in body size but with relatively large testes, indicating relatively frequent sperm competition in socially monogamous
and polygynous human societies. One estimate is that 83% of human societies are polygynous, 0.05% are polyandrous, and the
rest are monogamous. Even the last group may at least in part be genetically polygynous.[10]

From an evolutionary standpoint, females are more prone to practice monogamy because their reproductive success is based on
the resources she is able to acquire through reproduction rather than the quantity of offspring she produces. However, men are
more likely to practice polygamy because his reproductive success is based on the amount of offspring he produces, rather than
any kind of benefit from parental investment.[11]

Polygyny is associated with an increased sharing of subsistence provided by women. This is consistent with the theory that if
women raise the children alone, men can concentrate on the mating effort. Polygyny is also associated with greater environmental
variability in the form of variability of rainfall. This may increase the differences in the resources available to men. An important
association is that polygyny is associated with a higher pathogen load in an area which may make having good genes in a male
increasingly important. A high pathogen load also decreases the relative importance of sororal polygyny which may be because it
becomes increasingly important to have genetic variability in the offspring (See Major histocompatibility complex and sexual
selection).[10]

Virtually all the terms used to describe animal mating systems were adopted from social anthropology, where they had been
devised to describe systems of marriage. This shows that human sexual behavior is unusually flexible since, in most animal
species, one mating system dominates. While there are close analogies between animal mating systems and human marriage
institutions, these analogies should not be pressed too far, because in human societies, marriages typically have to be recognized
by the entire social group in some way, and there is no equivalent process in animal societies. The temptation to draw conclusions
about what is "natural" for human sexual behavior from observations of animal mating systems should be resisted: a socio-
biologist observing the kinds of behavior shown by humans in any other species would conclude that all known mating systems
were natural for that species, depending on the circumstances or on individual differences.[11]

As culture increasingly affects human mating choices, ascertaining what is the 'natural' mating system of the human animal from
a zoological perspective becomes increasingly difficult. Some clues can be taken from human anatomy, which is essentially
unchanged from the prehistoric past:

humans have a large relative size of testes to body mass in comparison to most primates;
humans have a large ejaculate volume and sperm count in comparison to other primates;
as compared to most primates, humans spend more time in copulation;[12]
as compared to most primates, humans copulate with greater frequency;
the outward signs of estrous in women (i.e. higher body temperature, breast swelling, sugar cravings, etc.), are
often perceived to be less obvious in comparison to the outward signs of ovulation in most other mammals;
for most mammals, the estrous cycle and its outward signs bring on mating activity; the majority of female-
initiated matings in humans coincides with estrous,[13] but humans copulate throughout the reproductive cycle;
after ejaculation/orgasm in males and females, humans release a hormone that has a sedative effect;[14]
however human females may remain sexually receptive and may remain in the plateau stage of orgasm if their
orgasm has not been completed.
Some have suggested that these anatomical factors signify some degree of sperm competition, though as levels of genetic and
societal promiscuity are highly varied across cultures,[15] this evidence is far from conclusive.

In microorganisms
Bacteria
Mating in bacteria involves transfer of DNA from one cell to another and incorporation of the transferred DNA into the recipient
bacteria’s genome by homologous recombination. Transfer of DNA between bacterial cells can occur in three main ways. First, a
bacterium can take up exogenous DNA released into the intervening medium from another bacterium by a process called
transformation. DNA can also be transferred from one bacterium to another by the process of transduction, which is mediated
by an infecting virus (bacteriophage). The third method of DNA transfer is conjugation, in which a plasmid mediates transfer
through direct cell contact between cells.

Transformation, unlike transduction or conjugation, depends on numerous bacterial gene products that specifically interact to
perform this complex process,[16] and thus transformation is clearly a bacterial adaptation for DNA transfer. In order for a
bacterium to bind, take up and recombine donor DNA into its own chromosome, it must first enter a special physiological state
termed natural competence. In Bacillus subtilis about 40 genes are required for the development of competence and DNA
uptake.[17] The length of DNA transferred during B. subtilis transformation can be as much as a third and up to the whole
chromosome.[18][19] Transformation appears to be common among bacterial species, and at least 60 species are known to have
the natural ability to become competent for transformation.[20] The development of competence in nature is usually associated
with stressful environmental conditions, and seems to be an adaptation for facilitating repair of DNA damage in recipient
cells.[21]

Archaea
In several species of archaea, mating is mediated by formation of cellular aggregates. Halobacterium volcanii, an extreme
halophilic archaeon, forms cytoplasmic bridges between cells that appear to be used for transfer of DNA from one cell to another
in either direction.[22]

When the hyperthermophilic archaea Sulfolobus solfataricus[23] and Sulfolobus acidocaldarius[24] are exposed to the DNA
damaging agents UV irradiation, bleomycin or mitomycin C, species-specific cellular aggregation is induced. Aggregation in S.
solfataricus could not be induced by other physical stressors, such as pH or temperature shift,[23] suggesting that aggregation is
induced specifically by DNA damage. Ajon et al.[24] showed that UV-induced cellular aggregation mediates chromosomal
marker exchange with high frequency in S. acidocaldarius. Recombination rates exceeded those of uninduced cultures by up to
three orders of magnitude. Frols et al.[23] and Ajon et al.[24] hypothesized that cellular aggregation enhances species-specific
DNA transfer between Sulfolobus cells in order to provide increased repair of damaged DNA by means of homologous
recombination. This response appears to be a primitive form of sexual interaction similar to the more well-studied bacterial
transformation systems that are also associated with species specific DNA transfer between cells leading to homologous
recombinational repair of DNA damage.[25]

Protists
Protists are a large group of diverse eukaryotic microorganisms, mainly unicellular animals and plants, that do not form tissues.
Eukaryotes emerged in evolution more than 1.5 billion years ago.[26] The earliest eukaryotes were likely protists. Mating and
sexual reproduction are widespread among extant eukaryotes. Based on a phylogenetic analysis, Dacks and Roger[27] proposed
that facultative sex was present in the common ancestor of all eukaryotes.

However, to many biologists it seemed unlikely until recently, that mating and sex could be a primordial and fundamental
characteristic of eukaryotes. A principal reason for this view was that mating and sex appeared to be lacking in certain pathogenic
protists whose ancestors branched off early from the eukaryotic family tree. However, several of these protists are now known to
be capable of, or to recently have had, the capability for meiosis and hence mating. To cite one example, the common intestinal
parasite Giardia intestinalis was once considered to be a descendant of a protist lineage that predated the emergence of meiosis
and sex. However, G. intestinalis was recently found to have a core set of genes that function in meiosis and that are widely
present among sexual eukaryotes.[28] These results suggested that G. intestinalis is capable of meiosis and thus mating and sexual
reproduction. Furthermore, direct evidence for meiotic recombination, indicative of mating and sexual reproduction, was also
found in G. intestinalis.[29][29] Other protists for which evidence of mating and sexual reproduction has recently been described
are parasitic protozoa of the genus Leishmania,[30] Trichomonas vaginalis,[31] and acanthamoeba.[32]

Protists generally reproduce asexually under favorable environmental conditions, but tend to reproduce sexually under stressful
conditions, such as starvation or heat shock.[25]

Viruses
Both animal viruses and bacterial viruses (bacteriophage) are able to undergo mating. When a cell is mixedly infected by two
genetically marked viruses, recombinant virus progeny are often observed indicating that mating interaction had occurred at the
DNA level. Another manifestation of mating between viral genomes is multiplicity reactivation (MR). MR is the process by
which at least two virus genomes, each containing inactivating genome damage, interact with each other in an infected cell to
form viable progeny viruses. The genes required for MR in bacteriophage T4 are largely the same as the genes required for allelic
recombination.[33] Examples of MR in animal viruses are described in the articles Herpes simplex virus, Influenza A virus,
Adenoviridae, Simian virus 40, Vaccinia virus, and Reoviridae.

See also
Assortative mating
r/K selection theory
Monocotyledon reproduction
Sexual reproduction

References
1. Brown, A. H. D.; et al. (1989). "Isozyme analysis of plant mating systems". In Soltis, D. E.; Soltis, P. S. (eds.).
Isozymes in Plant Biology. Portland: Dioscorides Press. pp. 73–86.
2. Kleiman, Devra G (1977). "Monogamy in Mammals". The Quarterly Review of Biology. 52 (1): 39–69.
doi:10.1086/409721 (https://doi.org/10.1086%2F409721). PMID 857268 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8
57268).
3. Pickett, K. M., Osborne, D. M., Wahl, D., and Wenzel, J. W. (2001). "An Enormous Nest of Vespula squamosa
from Florida, the Largest Social Was Nest Reported from North America, with Notes on Colony Cycle and
Reproduction", "Journal of the New York Entomological Society", 2001.
4. Dreisig, H. (1995-02-01). "Thermoregulation and flight activity in territorial male graylings, Hipparchia semele
(Satyridae), and large skippers, Ochlodes venata (Hesperiidae)". Oecologia. 101 (2): 169–176.
Bibcode:1995Oecol.101..169D (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995Oecol.101..169D).
doi:10.1007/BF00317280 (https://doi.org/10.1007%2FBF00317280). ISSN 0029-8549 (https://www.worldcat.org/i
ssn/0029-8549). PMID 28306787 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28306787).
5. McAuslane, H. J.; Vinson, S. B.; Williams, H. J. (1990-06-01). "Change in mandibular and mesosomal gland
contents of maleXylocopa micans (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae) associated with mating system". Journal of
Chemical Ecology. 16 (6): 1877–1885. doi:10.1007/BF01020501 (https://doi.org/10.1007%2FBF01020501).
ISSN 0098-0331 (https://www.worldcat.org/issn/0098-0331). PMID 24263991 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubm
ed/24263991).
6. Bekoff, Marc (2004). Encyclopedia of Animal Behavior. Westport: Greenwood Press. pp. 889–891. ISBN 978-0-
313-32747-6.
7. Howie, James (January 2017). "Female Sneak Copulation: In: Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological
Science" (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310505282). Researchgate. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
 8. Parker, G. A. (28 February 2006). "Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview" (https://www.ncbi.nl
m.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1569603). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
361 (1466): 235–259. doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1785 (https://doi.org/10.1098%2Frstb.2005.1785). PMC 1569603 (ht
tps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1569603). PMID 16612884 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1
6612884).
9. Yasukawa, Ken; Tang-Martínez, Zuleyma (2014). Animal behavior : how and why animals do the things they do.
California, USA: Praeger. p. 174. ISBN 978-0-313-39870-4.
10. The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, Edited by Robin Dunbar and Louise Barret, Oxford University
Press, 2007, Chapter 30 Ecological and socio-cultural impacts on mating and marriage systems by Bobbi S. Low
11. Cartwright, John. H (2002). Evolutionary Explanations of Human Behaviour. New York, NY: Taylor and Franis e-
Library. p. 19. ISBN 978-0-203-47064-0.
12. De Waal, Frans (March 1996). "Bonobo Sex and Society: The behavior of a close relative challenges
assumptions about male supremacy in human evolution" (https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/bonobo-sex-
and-society-2006-06/). Scientific American. Retrieved October 21, 2017.
13. Beach, Frank (1976). "Sexual attractivity, proceptivity, and receptivity in female mammals". Hormones and
Behavior. 7 (1): 105–138. doi:10.1016/0018-506x(76)90008-8 (https://doi.org/10.1016%2F0018-506x%2876%29
90008-8).
14. Esch, Tobias; Stefano, George (June 2005). "The Neurobiology of Love". Neuro Endocrinology Letters. 26 (3):
175–92. PMID 15990719 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15990719).
15. "Archived copy" (https://web.archive.org/web/20140302125838/http://raptor1.bizlab.mtsu.edu/s-drive/TEFF/662/p
apers2010/men_dominance/The%20Mating%20System%20of%20Foragers%20in%20the%20Standard%20Cros
s-Cultural%20Sample.pdf) (PDF). Archived from the original (http://raptor1.bizlab.mtsu.edu/s-drive/TEFF/662/pap
ers2010/men_dominance/The%20Mating%20System%20of%20Foragers%20in%20the%20Standard%20Cross-
Cultural%20Sample.pdf) (PDF) on 2014-03-02. Retrieved 2014-02-26.
16. Chen I, Dubnau D (2004). "DNA uptake during bacterial transformation". Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2 (3): 241–9.
doi:10.1038/nrmicro844 (https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fnrmicro844). PMID 15083159 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
pubmed/15083159).
17. Solomon JM, Grossman AD (1996). "Who's competent and when: regulation of natural genetic competence in
bacteria". Trends Genet. 12 (4): 150–5. doi:10.1016/0168-9525(96)10014-7 (https://doi.org/10.1016%2F0168-95
25%2896%2910014-7). PMID 8901420 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8901420).
18. Akamatsu T, Taguchi H (2001). "Incorporation of the whole chromosomal DNA in protoplast lysates into
competent cells of Bacillus subtilis". Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 65 (4): 823–9. doi:10.1271/bbb.65.823 (https://
doi.org/10.1271%2Fbbb.65.823). PMID 11388459 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11388459).
19. Saito Y, Taguchi H, Akamatsu T (2006). "Fate of transforming bacterial genome following incorporation into
competent cells of Bacillus subtilis: a continuous length of incorporated DNA". J. Biosci. Bioeng. 101 (3): 257–62.
doi:10.1263/jbb.101.257 (https://doi.org/10.1263%2Fjbb.101.257). PMID 16716928 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.go
v/pubmed/16716928).
20. Johnsborg O, Eldholm V, Håvarstein LS (2007). "Natural genetic transformation: prevalence, mechanisms and
function". Res. Microbiol. 158 (10): 767–78. doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2007.09.004 (https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.resmi
c.2007.09.004). PMID 17997281 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17997281).
21. Bernstein H, Bernstein C, Michod RE (2012). DNA repair as the primary adaptive function of sex in bacteria and
eukaryotes. Chapter 1: pp.1-49 in: DNA Repair: New Research, Sakura Kimura and Sora Shimizu editors. Nova
Sci. Publ., Hauppauge, N.Y. ISBN 978-1-62100-808-8
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=31918 Archived (https://web.archive.org/
web/20131029202307/https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=31918) 2013-10-
29 at the Wayback Machine
22. Rosenshine I, Tchelet R, Mevarech M (1989). "The mechanism of DNA transfer in the mating system of an
archaebacterium". Science. 245 (4924): 1387–9. Bibcode:1989Sci...245.1387R (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/ab
s/1989Sci...245.1387R). doi:10.1126/science.2818746 (https://doi.org/10.1126%2Fscience.2818746).
PMID 2818746 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2818746).
23. Fröls S, Ajon M, Wagner M, Teichmann D, Zolghadr B, Folea M, Boekema EJ, Driessen AJ, Schleper C, Albers
SV (2008). "UV-inducible cellular aggregation of the hyperthermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus is
mediated by pili formation" (https://www.rug.nl/research/portal/files/56956856/UV_inducible_cellular_aggregation
_of_the_hyperthermophilic_archaeon_Sulfolobus_solfataricus_is_mediated_by_pili_formation.pdf) (PDF). Mol.
Microbiol. 70 (4): 938–52. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06459.x (https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2958.2008.0
6459.x). PMID 18990182 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18990182).
24. Ajon M, Fröls S, van Wolferen M, Stoecker K, Teichmann D, Driessen AJ, Grogan DW, Albers SV, Schleper C
(2011). "UV-inducible DNA exchange in hyperthermophilic archaea mediated by type IV pili". Mol. Microbiol. 82
(4): 807–17. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07861.x (https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2958.2011.07861.x).
PMID 21999488 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21999488).
25. Bernstein H and Bernstein C (2013). Evolutionary Origin and Adaptive Function of Meiosis. In Meiosis: Bernstein
C and Bernstein H, editors. ISBN 978-953-51-1197-9, InTech,
http://www.intechopen.com/books/meiosis/evolutionary-origin-and-adaptive-function-of-meiosis
26. Javaux EJ, Knoll AH, Walter MR (2001). "Morphological and ecological complexity in early eukaryotic
ecosystems". Nature. 412 (6842): 66–9. doi:10.1038/35083562 (https://doi.org/10.1038%2F35083562).
PMID 11452306 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11452306).
27. Dacks J, Roger AJ (1999). "The first sexual lineage and the relevance of facultative sex". J. Mol. Evol. 48 (6):
779–83. Bibcode:1999JMolE..48..779D (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999JMolE..48..779D).
doi:10.1007/pl00013156 (https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fpl00013156). PMID 10229582 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.go
v/pubmed/10229582).
28. Ramesh MA, Malik SB, Logsdon JM (2005). "A phylogenomic inventory of meiotic genes; evidence for sex in
Giardia and an early eukaryotic origin of meiosis". Curr. Biol. 15 (2): 185–91. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.003 (http
s://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.cub.2005.01.003). PMID 15668177 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15668177).
29. Cooper MA, Adam RD, Worobey M, Sterling CR (2007). "Population genetics provides evidence for
recombination in Giardia". Curr. Biol. 17 (22): 1984–8. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.020 (https://doi.org/10.1016%2
Fj.cub.2007.10.020). PMID 17980591 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17980591).
30. Akopyants NS, Kimblin N, Secundino N, Patrick R, Peters N, Lawyer P, Dobson DE, Beverley SM, Sacks DL
(2009). "Demonstration of genetic exchange during cyclical development of Leishmania in the sand fly vector" (ht
tps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2729066). Science. 324 (5924): 265–8.
Bibcode:2009Sci...324..265A (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009Sci...324..265A).
doi:10.1126/science.1169464 (https://doi.org/10.1126%2Fscience.1169464). PMC 2729066 (https://www.ncbi.nl
m.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2729066). PMID 19359589 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19359589).
31. Malik SB, Pightling AW, Stefaniak LM, Schurko AM, Logsdon JM (2008). "An expanded inventory of conserved
meiotic genes provides evidence for sex in Trichomonas vaginalis" (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PM
C2488364). PLoS ONE. 3 (8): e2879. Bibcode:2008PLoSO...3.2879M (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008PL
oSO...3.2879M). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002879 (https://doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0002879).
PMC 2488364 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2488364). PMID 18663385 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.
nih.gov/pubmed/18663385).
32. Khan NA, Siddiqui R (2015). "Is there evidence of sexual reproduction (meiosis) in Acanthamoeba?" (https://ww
w.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4530557). Pathog Glob Health. 109 (4): 193–5.
doi:10.1179/2047773215Y.0000000009 (https://doi.org/10.1179%2F2047773215Y.0000000009). PMC 4530557
(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4530557). PMID 25800982 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubme
d/25800982).
33. Bernstein C (1981). "Deoxyribonucleic acid repair in bacteriophage" (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P
MC281499). Microbiol. Rev. 45 (1): 72–98. PMC 281499
(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC281499). PMID 6261109 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6
261109).

Further reading
Marlowe, F.W. (2003). "The Mating System of Foragers in the Standard Cross-Cultural Sample" (https://web.archi
ve.org/web/20060901112002/http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~hbe-lab/acrobatfiles/forager%20mating%20system.pd
 f) (PDF). Cross-Cultural Research. 37 (3): 282–306. doi:10.1177/1069397103254008 (https://doi.org/10.1177%2
F1069397103254008).

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mating_system&oldid=917901704"

This page was last edited on 26 September 2019, at 01:26 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using
this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia
Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.