See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/245817141
Cross correlation, autocorrelation, 2d pattern identification
Article
CITATIONS READS
16 1,037
1 author:
Paul Bourke
123 PUBLICATIONS 1,275 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Murujuga: Dynamics of the Dreaming View project
Photography View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Paul Bourke on 01 January 2014.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.
Cross Correlation
AutoCorrelation -- 2D Pattern Identification
Written by Paul Bourke
August 1996
Cross correlation is a standard method of estimating the degree to which two series are correlated. Consider two series x(i)
and y(i) where i=0,1,2...N-1. The cross correlation r at delay d is defined as
Where mx and my are the means of the corresponding series. If the above is computed for all delays d=0,1,2,...N-1 then it
results in a cross correlation series of twice the length as the original series.
There is the issue of what to do when the index into the series is less than 0 or greater than or equal to the number of points.
(i-d < 0 or i-d >= N) The most common approaches are to either ignore these points or assuming the series x and y are zero
for i < 0 and i >= N. In many signal processing applications the series is assumed to be circular in which case the out of
range indexes are "wrapped" back within range, ie: x(-1) = x(N-1), x(N+5) = x(5) etc
The range of delays d and thus the length of the cross correlation series can be less than N, for example the aim may be to
test correlation at short delays only. The denominator in the expression above serves to normalise the correlation
coefficients such that -1 <= r(d) <= 1, the bounds indicating maximum correlation and 0 indicating no correlation. A high
negative correlation indicates a high correlation but of the inverse of one of the series.
As a simple example consider the two rectangular pulses shown below
in blue and green, the correlation series is shown in red.
The maximum correlation is achieved at a delay of 3. Considering the
equations above, what is happening is the second series is being slid
past the first, at each shift the sum of the product of the newly lined up
terms in the series is computed. This sum will be large when the shift
(delay) is such that similar structure lines up. This is essentially the
same as the so called convolution except for the normalisation terms in
the denominator.
Source code
Sample C source to calculate the correlation series with no data wrapping. The two series are x[], and y[] of "n" points. The
correlation series is calculated for a maximum delay of "maxdelay".
int i,j
double mx,my,sx,sy,sxy,denom,r;
/* Calculate the mean of the two series x[], y[] */
mx = 0;
my = 0;
for (i=0;i<n;i++) {
mx += x[i];
my += y[i];
}
mx /= n;
my /= n;
/* Calculate the denominator */
sx = 0;
sy = 0;
for (i=0;i<n;i++) {
sx += (x[i] - mx) * (x[i] - mx);
sy += (y[i] - my) * (y[i] - my);
}
denom = sqrt(sx*sy);
/* Calculate the correlation series */
for (delay=-maxdelay;delay<maxdelay;delay++) {
sxy = 0;
for (i=0;i<n;i++) {
j = i + delay;
if (j < 0 || j >= n)
continue;
else
sxy += (x[i] - mx) * (y[j] - my);
/* Or should it be (?)
if (j < 0 || j >= n)
sxy += (x[i] - mx) * (-my);
else
sxy += (x[i] - mx) * (y[j] - my);
*/
}
r = sxy / denom;
/* r is the correlation coefficient at "delay" */
If the series are considered circular then the source with the same declarations as above might be
/* Calculate the mean of the two series x[], y[] */
mx = 0;
my = 0;
for (i=0;i<n;i++) {
mx += x[i];
my += y[i];
}
mx /= n;
my /= n;
/* Calculate the denominator */
sx = 0;
sy = 0;
for (i=0;i<n;i++) {
sx += (x[i] - mx) * (x[i] - mx);
sy += (y[i] - my) * (y[i] - my);
}
denom = sqrt(sx*sy);
/* Calculate the correlation series */
for (delay=-maxdelay;delay<maxdelay;delay++) {
sxy = 0;
sxy = 0;
for (i=0;i<n;i++) {
j = i + delay;
while (j < 0)
j += n;
j %= n;
sxy += (x[i] - mx) * (y[j] - my);
}
r = sxy / denom;
/* r is the correlation coefficient at "delay" */
Example
The following shows two time series x,y.
The cross correlation series with a maximum delay of 4000 is shown below. There is a strong correlation at a delay of about
40.
Auto Correlation
When the correlation is calculated between a series and a lagged version of itself it is called autocorrelation. A high
correlation is likely to indicate a periodicity in the signal of the corresponding time duration.
The correlation coefficient at lag k of a series x0, x1, x2,....xN-1 is normally given as
Where mx is the mean of the series. When the term i+k extends past the length of the series N two options are available.
The series can either be considered to be 0 or in the usual Fourier approach the series is assumed to wrap, in this case the
index into the series is (i+k) mod N.
If the correlation coefficient is calculated for all lags k=0,1,2...N-1 the resulting series is called the autocorrelation series or
the correlogram. The autocorrelation series can be computed directly as above or from the Fourier transform as
That is, one can compute the autocorrelation series by transforming the series into the frequency domain, taking the
modulus of each spectral coefficient, and then performing the inverse transform. Note that depending on the normalisation
used with the particular FFT algorithm there may need to be a scaling by N.
This method for computing the auto correlation series is particularly useful for long series where the efficiency of the Fast
Fourier Transform can significantly reduce the time required to compute the autocorrelation series.
Note that this is a special case of the expression for calculating the cross correlation using Fourier transforms. The Fourier
transform of the cross correlation function is the product of the Fourier transform of the first series and the complex
conjugate of the Fourier transform of the second series.
2D Pattern Identification using Cross Correlation
One approach to identifying a pattern within an image uses cross correlation of the image with a suitable mask. Where the
mask and the pattern being sought are similar the cross correlation will be high. The mask is itself an image which needs to
have the same functional appearance as the pattern to be found.
Consider the image below in black and the mask shown in red. The mask is centered at every pixel in the image and the
cross correlation calculated, this forms a 2D array of correlation coefficients.
The form of the un-normalised correlation coefficient at position (i,j) on the image is given by
where is the mean of the masks pixels and is the mean of the image pixels under (covered by) the mask.
The peaks in this cross correlation "surface" are the positions of the best matches in the image of the mask.
Issues
The process can be extremely time consuming, the 2D cross correlation function needs to be computed for every
point in the image. Calculation of the cross correlation function is itself a N2 operation. Ideally the mask should be
chosen as small as practicable.
In many image identification processes the mask may need to be rotated and/or scaled at each position.
This process is very similar to 2D filtering except in that case the image is replaced by an appropriately scaled
version of the correlation surface.
Example 1
In this first example it was necessary to pick out the position of the colour
singularities and to determine the orientation of the colour sequence. A sample
image illustrating the singularities to be analysed is shown below (all images and
masks shown here are at the same scale)
Two masks were required as the colour circles exist as mirror images as well as rotated. That is, yellow on the
right of read and yellow on the left of red.
The maximum cross correlation for all angles and for each of the two masks is retained for each position. This maximum
cross correlation surface with the image mapped onto it is
Example 2
This example is basically the same as the previous one except the non singularity regions
haven't been pre-filtered.
The resulting surface where the height is proportional to the maximum correlation coefficient across all angles and for the
mirror of the masks is
The width and relative height of the correlation peaks can be improved by matching the dimensions of the mask with those
of the features being sought in the image. For example, if the size of the mask is smaller and radial as below
(Note: the black denotes no mask is applied, not the colour black)
then the peaks are significantly narrower.
The above is an example over a relatively small portion of the whole image. The entire surface is
The maximum cross correlation image (white = high correlation, black = low correlation)
And finally the surface shown in 3D with the original image mapped onto it
View publication stats
