RESEARCH &

PUBLICATION
ETHICS
A COMPLETE GUIDE TO
CONDUCTING & PUBLISHING RESEARCH
ETHICALLY
Dear reader,

The topic of research ethics is important not only when conducting research but also when pub-

lishing it. It is one of the crucial pillars for maintaining scientific integrity and credibility. The onus
to implement fair practices lies with researchers, universities/institutions, and publishers.

Through this ebook, we intend to provide a concise yet comprehensive resource to graduate
students and early-stage researchers. We have identified common areas where researchers often

face doubts and challenges. We have shared insights on popular topics such as how to assign
authorship, how to avoid image manipulation and plagiarism, how to manage research data

effectively, or how to identify conflicts of interests. This ebook will provide you with ample tips
for effectively handling all such situations.

Towards the end, you will also find a list of authentic e-resources. It would be our pleasure to
help you with your publishing requirements. Please make it a point to visit enago.com/academy

for further help. We have posted 1,000+ original articles on this knowledge e-platform.

Happy reading!

Regards,

The Enago Academy Team

Website: https://www.enago.com/academy/

Mobile App: https://www.enago.com/academy/mobile-app/

Research Ethics………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...4

Research Ethics & Its Importance………………………………………………………………………………….5

Codes & Policies……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….8

Codes & Policymakers…………………………………………………………………………………………………...9

International Ethics Codes…………………………………………………………………………………………...10

Conducting & Publishing Research Ethically…………………………………………………………………………..12

Protection of Human Subjects……………………………………………………………………………………..13

Care of Laboratory Animals………………………………………………………………………………………….15

Handling Conflicts of Interest………………………………………………………………………………………17

Managing Research Data……………………………………………………………………………………………..19

Assigning Authorship…………………………………………………………………………………………………...21

Avoiding Plagiarism……………………………………………………………………………………………………...24
Publishing Research Ethically……………………………………………………………………………………….26

Research Misconduct……………………………………………………………………………………………………………...28
What is Research Misconduct?.............................................................................................................29

Image Manipulation……………………………………………………………………………………………………..30
Research Reproducibility……………………………………………………………………………………………...31

References……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….32
Free Author Resources…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….33
4
 5

What is ethical conduct of research? You may adherence to these can impact your

have often heard the term “ethics.” It is credibility and repute in the scientific
generally defined as a set of principles that community?

distinguish between acceptable and Firstly, these ethical codes not only
unacceptable behavior or way of conducting help maintain scientific integrity but also

a task. These guidelines or principles may safeguard the primary aim of conducting the
vary across countries, disciplines, institutions, research i.e. to promote knowledge and truth

and even laboratories. For instance, these [3]. Secondly, these values promote trust,
ethics may not only dictate the conduct and respect, and objectivity in a collaborative

functioning of an organization or a work environment by avoiding conflicts

government but also a business entity! Do related to authorship, copyrights, and others

you know which codes you should follow [3]. Moreover, these codes help maintain the
when conducting your research? safety and interest of human subjects and

One of the most commonly known ethical ensure appropriate care of animal subjects in
code in medical practice, the “Hippocratic a clinical or laboratory setting [3]. Lastly,

Oath,” dates back to 500 B.C. [1]. Over the these ethical norms make researchers
years, guidelines such as Nuremberg Code accountable for the quality and outcome of

and Declaration of Helsinki have been the research that may directly or indirectly
introduced and implemented into practice. affect public health and interests [3].

Moreover, ethical policies addressing issues

related to plagiarism, fabrication, conflicts of

interest etc. are being outlined at different

governmental and academic levels. Refer to

the ethics timeline below for a detailed

overview [2].

Why is it important for you as a researcher to

follow these ethical codes? How does
6
7
8
 9

Various organizations have played an This body is mainly responsible for protecting

instrumental role in the development and the rights and welfare of human subjects
adoption of the ethical guidelines across involved in clinical studies. IRBs and ECs

universities, funding agencies, publishers, and oversee any clinical trial or biomedical
institutions. Some of the prominent names research [4]. These entities not only review the

are listed below. Moreover, universities and protocol but also ensure compliance with the
research institutes set up an independent required ethical codes, thereby minimizing

administrative entity called ethical committee any risk to the subjects involved.
(EC) or an institutional review board (IRB).
 10

Few of the international codes and policies tions of your agreements. Show sincerity

[2, 3] include: and consistency in your actions and

 Code of Ethics from the International thoughts.

Sociological Association  Honesty: Communicate and report your

 Universal Declaration on Bioethics and research data, results, methods,

Human Rights from UNESCO procedures, and publication status

 International Ethical Guidelines for honestly. Strictly avoid falsification,

Biomedical Research Involving Human fabrication, and misrepresentation of

Subjects from the Council for International research output.

Organizations of Medical Sciences  Objectivity: Avoid bias in experiment/

(CIOMS) study design, data analysis, data

 Declaration of Helsinki from the World interpretation, peer review, personnel

Medical Association decisions, and grant writing. Disclose both

 Nuremberg Code personal and financial interests.

 The Chemical Professional's Code of  Competence: Strive to improve your
Conduct from the American Chemical expertise and take effective steps to
Society advance competence in your field.

 Singapore Statement on Research  Carefulness: Maintain a good record of

Integrity your research activities including data

 ICH Guidelines from The International collection and correspondences with

Council for Harmonisation of Technical journals. Examine your work thoroughly

Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for with peers to avoid errors.

Human Use  Openness: Share your data, results, tools,
Shamoo and Resnik have effectively resources, and ideas.
summarized the important ethical require-  Legality: Adhere to required governmental
ments for researchers [2]: and institutional laws/policies.
 Integrity: Fulfil your promises and obliga-
 11
 Confidentiality: Maintain confidentiality of the study population.

important information such as patient

records, trade or military secrets, grant

applications, and papers submitted for

publication.

 Non-discrimination: Avoid discrimination

against colleagues or students based on

gender, sex, ethnicity, race, or religion.

 Respect for Intellectual Property: Do not
use published or unpublished material
without permission. Avoid plagiarism!

Acknowledge and credit the original

author/creator. Follow obligations related

to a patent, copyright, trademark, and

more.

 Responsible Publication: Avoid duplicate

publication. Follow publication ethics to

advance science and not just your career.

 Responsible Mentoring: Encourage,
educate, mentor, and advise students.
 Social Responsibility: Advocate and
advance public interests and
health through your research.

 Animal Care: Show respect and care

for animals in a study by avoiding bad

study designs and experiments.

 Human Subjects Protection: Maintain
respect, confidentiality, welfare, and
dignity of human subjects involved in

clinical studies. Minimize any risk/harm to

12
 13

Research studies involving human subjects

contribute to the advancement of medical

and health sciences. Such studies provide

insightful data on safety and efficacy of new

lines of treatments, therapies, drugs, or

devices. However, the involvement of human

subjects does increase the risk and harm

to the subjects. Therefore, clinical studies are

highly scrutinized and regulated.

Researchers should not only follow

relevant international guidelines but also

abide by the local or state regulations for

protection and welfare of the human subjects.

For instance, in the U.S., Title 45 of the Code

A resource on health research, called
of Federal Regulations, Part 46 (45 CFR 46)
Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of
from Health and Human Services (HHS) and
health Research (EQUATOR) provides the
21 CFR 50 and 56 from FDA, define rules for
most recent information on study designs
human subjects research [5].
and reporting standards for researchers and
There are effectively two types of clinical
clinicians [7].
studies [6].
For a detailed overview of these statements,
 Intervention studies/clinical trials
refer to the table below.
 Observational studies
Moreover, different standard guidelines (e.g.,

CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, etc.) do exist for

designing, conducting, and reporting

intervention and observational studies.

 14
Most journals require authors to register In addition, statements mentioning that

clinical trials prior to publishing research in appropriate clearances were taken from
public clinical trial registries such as research ethics committees or institutional

ClinicalTrials.gov, ISRCTN registry, and EU review boards before the conduct of the trials
Clinical Trials Register [8]. The journals also are also required. Journals, therefore, have

encourage authors to submit statements the right to reject manuscripts that do not
indicating that international guidelines and follow the required guidelines [9].

best practices were followed in these trials.

 15

Studies involving laboratory animals have In addition, the National Institute of Health

provided insights into the development of (NIH) Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare
new vaccines and drugs. Unlike human (OLAW) provides extensive resources on

subjects, laboratory animals cannot give policies and guidelines on the use of animals.
informed consent and therefore, the care and The journals require authors to submit

use of animal subjects in a study warrant documents to indicate whether institutional

attention from researchers. or national guidelines for animal subjects

An Institutional Animal Care and Use were followed and whether approval was
Committee (IACUC) in universities or taken from the relevant ethics committees.

institutes ensures that appropriate Many journals reserve the right to reject
procedures and study protocols are followed manuscripts if these requirements are not

for the welfare and humane treatment of all followed.

the animal subjects.

Kilkenny et al. laid out extensive guidelines,

called ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of

In Vivo Experiments) to improve the reporting

of studies involving animals [10]. It is a

20-point checklist that is used when

submitting manuscripts that outlines or

describes animal research.

Moreover, the principles of the 3Rs

(Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement)

proposed by Russell and Burch more than 50

years ago have now been globally accepted

and implemented. Refer to the figure below

for a detailed overview of these principles

[11].
16
 17

The changing dynamics of research moral convictions or personal beliefs that

environment and collaborations can often can influence scientific opinions.

give rise to conflicts of interests and  Academic competition: It can include

commitments/obligations. Therefore, it is biased judgements because of the direct

important to maintain transparency in or indirect competition with peers or

research and publication by both authors and colleagues.

publishers. Such situations are sometimes unavoidable

What constitutes conflicts of interest? For and finding yourself in such a situation itself
instance, conflicts of interest can arise when a is not unethical [12]. Therefore, all the

researcher who is heading the research of a stakeholders, including authors, editors, and
product is also a visiting consultant at the reviewers must maintain transparency and

parent company. Conflicts of interest can also disclose all potential or actual conflicts of
arise when an author, researcher, editor, or a interest.

peer reviewer has a relationship (personal or So, what is your responsibility as an author in
financial) that can directly or indirectly affect reporting and managing conflicts of interest?

his/her objectivity in making decisions or The Office of Research Integrity (ORI)

influence his/her actions [12, 13]. suggests that to manage or remove conflicts

Conflicts of interests [12, 13] can arise of interest, take the following steps [5].
because of the following:  Disclose all interests so that the

 Financial relationships: These can include stakeholders are aware and can take the
direct employment, consultancies to a required steps.

related organization/company, stock  Monitor research and research results for

options, grants, patents, and paid expert transparency and integrity.

testimony.  Remove the person in question from

 Personal relationships: These can include important processes such as data

rivalries and bias. interpretation or review process.

 Intellectual beliefs: These can include
 18
As an author, make sure you follow International Committee of Medical Journal

the guidelines described below (Ref.: Editors (ICMJE)).

 19

Data are important outputs of a research also an important aspect.

process. These can be used to accept or reject Researchers have the responsibility to
a hypothesis or frame a new hypothesis. Data maintain the integrity of the research data.

management, therefore, is crucial during and The group members involved in the handling
even after the research [5]. It can include the of the data should maintain privacy and

following aspects. confidentiality of the data while recording on

 Data ownership: It implies ownership of hard-copy or electronic evidence.

the legal rights to the research data Lapses in the management of research data
during and after the research project. The can give rise to many ethical issues. These

important stakeholders include funders, issues are more prominent in studies

research institutions, principal involving human subjects.

investigators, and even data sources.

 Data collection: It implies consistent and

quality-controlled collection of data. Few

important aspects include obtaining

required authorization, using appropriate

methods, and applying attention to

details.
 Data storage: It implies protection of data

from damage, loss, or theft. Data storage

is important to recheck the findings, to

prioritize research activities/tasks and to

be reanalyzed by others.

 Data sharing: It implies deciding what

to share and with whom (general public or

other researchers) to share the preliminary

data or final results. Data withholding is
 20
Researchers should, therefore, provide data

management plan (DMP) to ethics

committees for clinical studies/trials for

approval.
Moreover, informed consent to obtain data

and protecting or anonymising a certain part

of data during analysis or sharing should also

be proactively implemented. An effective data

management plan can help you avoid ethical

issues [14]. Refer to this checklist for few

important points.
 21

Do you know the importance of the names resolved.

appearing at the top of a research or a review Moreover, the author should be able to
paper? Allocating authorship allows identify which co-authors are responsible for

researchers to assign appropriate credit and which part of the work.

acknowledge their contribution to the According to ICMJE, in a large multi-author

research. However, assigning authorship is study, the decision on authorship should be

not always that simple as it also implies taken before submitting a manuscript to the

accountability and responsibility for the journal. Each author of such studies should
published work. Authorship issues can qualify those four criteria and individually

sometimes lead to conflicts and give rise to submit conflicts of disclosure forms to the
misconducts. journal editor. Additionally, some large

Many journals now, therefore, request multi-author groups can choose a group
researchers to submit contributorship name to assign authorship. In that case, a

statement mentioning the role of each group name should be used when making a
researcher. submission to the journal along with a

According to ICMJE [15], an author must description of who all qualify as authors in
satisfy these four criteria. that group.

 Made substantial contributions to the What about individuals who do not qualify all
design and conception of the study; data four of the criteria, but have contributed to

collection, analysis, and interpretation. the study? You should make sure to
 Drafted or revised the intellectual content/ acknowledge them as contributors.

output. Contributors usually help in the acquisition of

 Approved the final version of the funding, supervising research group,

manuscript for publication. providing administrative support, assisting in

 Agreed to be accountable for the research technical writing, editing, proofreading, etc.

work, ensuring that queries related to

accuracy or integrity of the research are
 22
Apart from that, the corresponding author

communicates with the journal during

manuscript submission, peer review, and

publishing. He/she ensures that all the

documentation requirements related to ethics

committees approvals, authorship, conflict of

interest, clinical trial registration etc. are met

[15].
Read through the figure below to identify

disputes and misconducts in authorship.

Researchers, especially those at the early

stage of their careers should ensure to follow

appropriate author guidelines by the target

journal or international organizations such as

ICMJE, World Association of Medical Editors

(WAME), and the American Medical Writers

Association (AMWA). You can also consult

your advisors or mentors to solve these

issues.
23
 24

When drafting the manuscript, authors refer  Verbatim plagiarism: Copy word-to-word

to published/unpublished work to draw upon from original work without quoting &
ideas or to support their statements. citing it.

However, researchers often end up in  Self plagiarism: Reuse significant portions

plagiarism trap intentionally or accidentally. of own previously published work without

Plagiarism is defined as an unethical practice attribution.

of using someone else's work, ideas, data,  Paraphrasing plagiarism: Use someone

concept, words, methods, images, etc. else’s writing with some minor changes in
without proper acknowledgment and the sentences (using synonyms) and using

presenting them as their own [16]. It is a it as one’s own.

serious misconduct and professional  Mosaic/patchwork plagiarism:

infarction. Therefore, it is important to give Interlay someone else’s phrases or text

appropriate credit to the author or the within own work.

source. Plagiarism is a serious offense. It can not only

The severity and extent of plagiarism can vary have legal implications but also damage the

[17] and can fall under the following catego- credibility and reputation of the author. In
ries. academic publishing, plagiarism can lead to

 Complete plagiarism/ intellectual theft: retraction of the published work and loss of
Submit work under one's name when academic positions or jobs. Read through the

somebody else has created it. figure below for effective tips to avoid
 Source-based plagiarism: Reference a plagiarism when drafting your manuscript.

source that is incorrect or does not exist Authors can also use plagiarism checkers
i.e. a misleading citation. May also occur such as PlagScan, iThenticate, etc. to avoid

when the author cites only the primary text plagiarism. However, all plagiarism
source without citing the secondary checkers are not created equal. While few

source from where information was ob- have access to premium databases (e.g.,
tained. Crossref) for similarity check, others do not
25
 26

Researchers primarily use journal articles or The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)

books to communicate the results of their has outlined guidelines for journal editors to
research to the scientific community and identify and avoid such misconducts in

general public. Therefore, following submitted manuscripts and published papers

publishing ethics is equally important for [19, 20].

researchers and journals. Journals require Researchers should consider the following
authors to disclose whether the same points to avoid unethical publishing practices

research has been published before or is [21].

being considered for publication elsewhere.  Do not submit the same paper to different

Duplicate publications and simultaneous journals.

submissions account for serious misconduct!  Maintain transparency during submission

Often, in biomedical research, authors and peer review process on previously

present same data with different analyses (of published work (disclose publication in

a subgroup). In that case, authors should conference proceedings, submission to a

disclose the original source of the data and pre-print repository etc.).

previous publications when making  Check with the publisher about translating
a submission. ICMJE define simultaneous and publishing the work again.

submissions and duplicate publications as  Disclose already published and/or

follows [18]: translated versions of the submitted

Submission. manuscript.
 Simultaneous Submissions:  Avoid dividing your study into multiple

Submitting same manuscript in same or publications.

different language(s) to one or more than Journals may allow secondary publications in

one journal at the same time. certain cases [18].

 Duplicate publications: Publishing a paper  Author(s) have got approval from the

that is significantly similar to the paper editors of both the journals (ensure they
published previously. have access to the original/primary
 27
published work).  The secondary publication informs readers

 The editors have agreed on the that primary publication has been
publication interval between the primary published previously (whole or in parts) by

and secondary publication. citing it appropriately.

 The secondary publication refers (cite) to  The title should indicate that it is a

the data and interpretation of the primary secondary publication.

publication.
28
 29

The ORI defines research misconduct as image or data manipulation. Researchers are

fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in often not aware of the nuances between

designing, conducting, or reviewing research image modification and manipulation. They

or in reporting the findings of the research use image processing tools without having
[22]. appropriate training in concepts such as

Falsification involves misrepresentation of the vector graphics, RGB vs. CMYK, continuous-
research by changing data or results or by tone images, etc. [23—25].

tampering with equipment, research

methods, or materials.

Fabrication involves reporting false or made-

up data, results, or research outputs.

Plagiarism involves presenting others' ideas,

works, or words without acknowledging or

providing appropriate credit to the original

authorship.

What about errors that are unintentional or

situations that arise because of different

opinions? These do not fall under scientific

misconduct or fraud.

Universities and research institutions define

policies and guidelines for researchers to

maintain scientific integrity while conducting

research. These guidelines also provide

information on how to report any such cases.

Make sure you are aware of your university's

policies.
Most cases of scientific misconduct involve
30
 31

Reproducibility in research is important to  Refrain from data fabrication or

validate findings. What is reproducibility? manipulation.

Reproducibility is defined as when a It is important to note that reproducible

researcher is able to duplicate the same research is not always correct [27]. There are
phenomenon even when experimental many instances as follows.

conditions are varied. Whereas, replicability is  False positives in published research.

defined as when a researcher is able to obtain  Bad quality of data and data analysis.

same results when the experiment is  Poor study design.

conducted under same experimental  Missed confounding variables.

conditions [26].  Omitted data points.

Although reproducibility is promoted in

science, researchers are not keen to replicate

or read published results. Moreover,

published work is expected to be

reproducible but its rarely tested on those

grounds later.
It is the responsibility of the researchers to

promote reproducibility. So, how can you

ensure that your work is reproducible?

 Write detailed experimental protocols that

are easy to understand/implement.

 Share your research outputs in an open

access repository to make them

accessible.
 Perform experiments (with variations) in

duplicates/triplicates to increase
the robustness of your findings.
 32
REFERENCES
[1] Research Ethics Timeline-National Patient Safety Agency: http://www.npsa.nhs.uk/EasysiteWeb/getresource.axd?

AssetID=357&type=Full&servicetype=Attachment

[2] Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present): https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/timeline/index.cfm

[3] What is Ethics in Research & Why is It Important?: https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis/

index.cfm

[4] Guidance for IRBs, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/regulatoryinformation/guidances/

ucm328855.pdf

[5] Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of Research: https://ori.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/rcrintro.pdf

[6] Research ethics: How to Treat People Who Participate in Research: https://bioethics.nih.gov/education/
FNIH_BioethicsBrochure_WEB.PDF
[7] Reporting guidelines for Main Study Types: http://www.equator-network.org
[8] Best Practice Guidelines on Publication Ethics: a Publisher's Perspective: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/

PMC1804120/
[9] Promoting Research Integrity: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1804120/#__sec12title

[10] ARRIVE Guidelines: https://www.nc3rs.org.uk/arrive-guidelines

[11] What are the 3Rs?: https://www.nc3rs.org.uk/the-3rs

[12] A Brief Overview on Conflict of Interests: https://ori.hhs.gov/plagiarism-35
[13] Author Responsibilities—Conflicts of Interest: http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/
author-responsibilities--conflicts-of-interest.html

[14] Research Data Management: Ethical Issues http://libguides.ucd.ie/data/ethics

[15] Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors: http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-

responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html

[16] Plagiarism: https://ori.hhs.gov/plagiarism-3

[17] 8 Most Common Types of Plagiarism to Stay Away from!: https://www.enago.com/academy/fraud-research-many-types-
plagiarism/

[18]Overlapping Publications: http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/publishing-and-editorial-issues/overlapping-

publications.html

[19] What to d if you suspect redundant (duplicate) publication: https://publicationethics.org/files/

u2/01B_Redundant_Published.pdf
[20] What to d if you suspect redundant (duplicate) publication: https://publicationethics.org/files/

u2/01A_Redundant_Submitted.pdf
[21] Redundancy, Publication Overlap, and Other Forms of Duplication: https://ori.hhs.gov/plagiarism-15

[22] Definition of Research Misconduct: https://ori.hhs.gov/definition-misconduct

[23] Image Manipulation: https://www.councilscienceeditors.org/wp-content/uploads/v30n6p185.pdf

[24] Guidelines for Best Practices in Image Processing: https://ori.hhs.gov/education/products/RIandImages/guidelines/

list.html

[25] Questionable Practices: https://ori.hhs.gov/education/products/RIandImages/practices/default.html

[26] Reproducible Science: http://iai.asm.org/content/78/12/4972.full

[27] Reproducible Research Can Still Be Wrong: Adopting a Prevention Approach: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/

papers/1502/1502.03169.pdf
 33

Our YouTube channel offers

exclusive access to author-
centric content on academic
writing and publishing. Make
sure you check out our expert
interviews too. Through our
YouTube channel, we share
informative and engaging
videos that address the most
common challenges faced by
researchers during their
research and publication
journey.

Q&A Forum

A dynamic Q&A platform to

engage and communicate with
researchers. It aims to provide
expert response and comments to
all the queries posted by
researchers, at any phase of
manuscript writing and
publication.
 34

THANK YOU FOR READING OUR EBOOK!

We have more for you! You can now access our exclusive content
on the go in a fast, free, and convenient way through our free
mobile app.

What’s in it for you?

 Curated content and exclusive featured articles!

 Tips on academic writing for English language journals

 Video interviews with industry experts to enrich your

learning experience

 Push notifications when new content is published on

Enago Academy

Key features:

 No internet? No problem. You will get access to the con-

tent offline

 Easy and smooth interface to read articles

 Swipe to go next or previous article from anywhere

 Browse through various categories

 Mark favorite articles so that you can read them later

 And much more...