It Nba C-2
It Nba C-2
The following procedure is followed in the design and development of curriculum for each program offered by the
department:
Guiding Principles: The following guiding principles are taken into account.
Receiving the inputs from stakeholders on the curriculum design and development by circulating the
PEOs, POs and PSOs of the program.
Meetings with in the department among the faculty members and students.
Meeting with experts from industry and academia on evolving possible projections in the in the subject
areas over next five years and structure of the curriculum.
Preparing the draft copy of curriculum for the program by the faculty sub-committee incorporating all the
suggestions of the stakeholders.
The draft copy of the curriculum was thoroughly discussed in the meetings of Boards of studies having
subject experts from industry and reputed institutes.
The modifications/changes suggested by the subject experts are well taken in preparing the final copy of
curriculum.
The copy of curriculum approved by the BoS is submitted to the Academic Council for further discussion
and modifications.
The modifications suggested by the Academic Council are included in the final copy of curriculum.
Fig, 2.1 The process for designing the program curriculum
2.1.2 Structure of the Curriculum (5)
R17 REGULATION:
I YEAR I SEMESTER
Total number of contact hours Credits
Course
Course title Lecture Tutorial Practical# Total
code
(L) (T) (p) hours
EG2501 Functional English 4 - --- 4 3
MA2502 Linear Algebra & Integral Transforms 4 1 - 5 4
PH2506 Applied Physics 4 - --- 4 3
EN2501 Environmental Studies 3 - --- 3 2
CT2502 Problem Solving through Computer Programming 4 - - 4 3
EG2502 Functional English Lab - - 2 2 1
PH2507 Applied Physics Lab - - 2 2 1
CT2503 Computer Programming Lab - - 4 4 2
Total 19 1 8 32 19
I YEAR II SEMESTER
CH2506 Chemistry 4 - - 4 3
II YEAR II SEMESTER
Open Elective-II
IT2505
i) Open Source Software 4 - - 4 3
IT2506
ii) Cyber Laws
Operating Systems and Compiler Design
CT2514 - - 4 4 2
Lab
CT2522 Web Technologies Lab - - 4 4 2
Total 21 3 8 32 22
Optional Elective - III
IT2508 i) Object Oriented Programming through
EC2522 C++ - - - - 3
CE2549 ii) Data Communication
iii) Building Information Modelling
IT2509 Optional Elective - IV (MOOCs) - - - 2
Students shall opt from the list of
MOOCs given by the Department)
III YEAR II SEMESTER
Total number of contact hours
Course
Course title Lecture Tutorial Practical# Total Credits
code
(L) (T) (p) hours
CT2527 Design and Analysis of Algorithms 3 1 - 4 3
CT2528 Data Warehousing and Data Mining 4 - - 4 3
IT2510 Object Oriented Analysis and Design * 4 - 2 6 4
CT2519 Computer Networks 3 1 - 4 3
Open Elective-III
CT2529 i) Scripting Languages 4 - - 4 3
CT2531 (Other than CSE)
ii) Software Project Management
Total 22 2 6 30 21
Optional Elective – V
IT2514
i) Secure Web Technologies
IT2515 - - - - 3
ii) Management Information Systems
ME2544
iii) Robotics
Optional Elective - VI
IT2516 (MOOCs) - - - - 2
Students shall opt from the list of MOOCs given
by the Department)
Professional Elective – IV
Open Elective-IV
Total 19 - 8 27 20
R14 REGULATION:
I YEAR I SEMESTER
II YEAR I SEMESTER
II YEAR II SEMESTER
Total number of contact hours
Course
Course title Tutorial(T) Total Credits
code Lecture(L) Practical#(p)
hours
Formal Languages & Automata -
CT1508 4 --- 4 3
Theory
CT1516 Software Engineering 4 - --- 4 3
IT1502 Computer Organization 4 - --- 4 3
IT1503 Advanced Data Structures Using C 4 - --- 4 3
CT1512 Database Management Systems 4 - --- 4 3
CT1515 Design and Analysis of Algorithms 4 - --- 4 3
EG1505 Employability Skills 1 - 2 3 2
Advanced Data Structures and -
IT1504 --- 3 3 2
Algorithms Lab
CT1513 Database Management Systems Lab --- - 3 3 2
Total 25 - 8 33 24
Sports & Games / Creative Arts - 2 - --
SG1501 --- 2 --- ----
(Mandatory Non-Credit Course)
III YEAR I SEMESTER
SEMESTER
R17 REGULATION
Course Component Curriculum content (% of total number of Total number of Total number of
credits of the program) contact hours credits
Basic Sciences 7.5 27 12
R14 REGULATION
Curriculum content (% of total
Total number of Total number
Course Component number of credits of the
contact hours of credits
program)
Basic Sciences 13.9 30 25
Assessment
Feedback
Continuous Internal
Evaluation, Semester End
Examination
Assessment on
POs & PSOs
No Are POs/PSOs
Yes
attained?
Board of Studies
Fig 2.1.4. The process of identifying the extent of compliance of the curriculum.
Program curriculum and syllabus is approved by Board of Studies and the assessment of the curriculum and syllabus is done
by internal and external members. Feedback from Students, Parents, Recruiters, Industry, and Alumni are taken for indirect
assessment. Mapping is performed for each assessment with POs and PSOs. From the direct and indirect assessment POs
and PSOs are calculated.
Feedback from students:
The students provide feedback about course coordinator’s teaching two times in a semester. It is valuable as it
helps course coordinator to improve and refine teaching. The feedback from students also taken in the form of
course end survey to see whether the COs are strongly or loosely attained and exit survey to see whether the
program outcomes are strongly or loosely attained.
Feedback from alumni:
The feedback is also taken from alumni, employers and industry experts. Alumni give the feedback about, the
usefulness of the program curriculum in their current job/company and suggest any modifications are required
in next revision of curriculum.
Employers give feedback about the students who joined in their industry, whether the students meet the
expectation or challenges in the industry.
Parents are another important stakeholder for the academic Program. The parent constituency contributes by providing
valuable suggestions and feedbacks.
Industry experts give the feedback regarding the latest technological developments, and the subjects to be
included in the upcoming curriculum.
2.2.1. Describe Processes followed to improve quality of Teaching & Learning (15)
In the beginning of every academic year, the academic calendar is framed and issued to the faculty members and
students.
An academic calendar is framed based on the discussions with the Controller of Examinations, Department Heads,
Departmental club coordinator, Department level consultative committee and other decision-making authorities. The
framing is carried out at least 15 days before the commencement of the academic year. The calendar is printed and
handed over to the students at the beginning of the academic year.
The calendar provides information about the Vision, Mission and quality policy of the institution and department. The
calendars list the details of amenities, and Research centres available to students. The awards received by students and
faculty members are also briefed in the calendar. Rules and regulations pertaining to the hostel, library, classrooms and
other areas within the campus are enlisted.
Duration of semester
A schedule of conferences, workshops, guest lecturers is chalked out and included in the academic schedule to improve
the quality of teaching-learning process.
Course plan:
In the teaching –learning process, the course plan plays a vital role. It is prepared by each faculty member handling their
respective courses 15 days prior to the commencement of every semester. The course plan for each of the course is
scrutinised by the PC under the guidance of the Head of the Department
Course plan includes course outcomes, teaching aids, teaching methods, learning outcomes, and mapping of outcomes
and learning resources that can be effectively utilized for the best delivery.
Based on the course plan, the delivery is recorded accordingly in the Faculty Attendance Register and reviewed by the
HoD and Vice principal (Academics).
All faculty members maintain the course handout for the course that they handle. It contains the following details
Institute vision
Institute mission
Timetable
Classroom teaching
In the teaching-learning process, the lectures are delivered by the faculty member through a set of teaching aids and adopting
various teaching methods.
These include:
Teaching Aids:
Chalk & Board, Power point presentation, Video Lectures by eminent faculty, Animation, etc.,
Teaching Methods:
Lecture
Demonstration
Industrial Visit
Tutorial
Technical Training
Lecture:
Lecture is an efficient and traditional method for delivering substantial amount of information and imparting knowledge to a
large number of students. It provides a summary or synthesis of information from various sources. The faculty member
ensures to kindle the student for exploring much more on the topic that is delivered with substantial amount of information.
The faculty member ensures that at least a small group of students among the batch are attracted towards the topic
summarized and henceforth kindled towards the other modes of teaching aids. Faculty member explains the concepts,
principles solutions to problems and applications of respective subject. Lectures create an interest in the subject among the
students and kindle their creativity for application in the field.
Demonstration:
Learning Engineering demands demonstrations. Demonstrations need not be working models. Faculty members choose day-
to-day essentials for demonstrations of engineering concepts. The approach is much suitable for basic level engineering
courses so that the student recollects the basic concept each and every time he looks at the items.
Industrial Visit:
Industrial visits represent one of the important attribute in any engineering undergraduate program that contribute to the
achievement of various essential learning outcomes and program outcomes.
It provides the students an opportunity to learn practically through interaction, and by seeing the working methods and
employment practices.
NPTEL provides E-learning through online web and video courses in engineering, science and Humanities streams. The
mission of NPTEL is to enhance the quality of Engineering Education in the country by providing free online courseware.
Tutorial:
Tutorial classes are conducted to train the students in analytical subjects. The total strength of students is divided into two
equal halves and two tutorial classes are handled by two faculty members, so that special concentration would be given to
the weak students. Tutorial classes help the students to improve their analytical and problem-solving skills. Implementation
of tutorial classes helps the students to clear analytical papers in semester end examination.
Pre-placement Training (PPT):
Pre-placement training refreshes the basics which will be helpful for placement activities.
Specially designed training (soft skills, communication skills) is given to students. Such activities facilitate the students to
win in job recruitment /placement.
CLT Classes
The faculty member who is teaching the course identifies the important topics in the subject and teaches the students from
all the sections.
For each course, a course file is maintained by the concerned faculty member. .It includes Faculty Record Book, question
bank, assignment topics, Sample CIE test papers and sample answer papers.
Learning outcomes
Course contents-Syllabus
Time Table
Record of Attendance
Faculty in the cadre of Assistant Professors are advised to take MOOC courses in his/her area of interest or in the subject
being taught in the current semester. It helps the faculty member to enhance his/her skills in the specified subject area and
through this they can also enhance the skill of students. Students are also advised to take certifications in NPTEL/Coursera
to improve knowledge in the course.
List of faculty members Completed NPTEL courses 2018-19 II SEM
The faculty members regularly conduct meetings regarding progress of their mentees and are responsible to identify the
students who scored less than 50% marks in their internals.
Under the HoD’s direction, the faculty counsellors identify the students who score below 50% marks in three or more
subjects and below 75% attendance. These students are considered as academically weak students and this fact intimated to
their parents.
Students scoring less marks faculty, Class Teacher, Academic Coordinator, Student
Counsellors and HoD.
Students’ performances are intimated to parents.
Remedial measures (counselling, classes, and tutorial) are
taken.
Examination failure reasons are analyzed.
Counselling is given to the student.
Failures in Semester End Examinations Coaching classes are conducted before the commencement
of semester end examination.
Discussion on important topics.
An online feedback is collected from students regarding the quality of teaching during each semester. The students’
feedback forms are depicted in Table 1 & 2. After six weeks of the commencement of the semester, the students are asked to
respond to a feedback questionnaire with 15 questions. Once the feedback process is complete, the reports are generated
automatically based on the formula. The consolidated report containing grade for each course is sent to the respective Heads
of the department and the information is disseminated to the faculty in the department. Corrective actions are taken for the
faculty members who have obtained low percentage / grade by the Head of the Department.
Table:1
Subject-Name : Subject-id :
10 Does the Teacher use fulltime in the Class for teaching the Subject?
11 Does the Teacher motivate you in developing interest in the subject?
FINAL RESULT:
TOTAL PERCENTAGE AWARDED TO THE FACULTY GRADE OF FACULTY
Faculty-Name : Faculty-id :
Subject-Name : Subject-id :
GRADES
QUESTION- QUESTION-WISE
S.No QUESTION
WISE TOTAL PERCENTAGES
A B C
* TOTAL
2.2.2. Quality of end semester examination, internal semester question papers, assignments and evaluation (15)
Process of internal semester question paper setting, model answers, evaluation and its compliance
Each theory course shall be evaluated for a total of 100 marks, consisting of 40 marks for internal assessment and 60 marks
for semester end examination.
Out of 40 marks for internal assessment, 10 marks are for continuous assessment in the form of two quiz or subjective
tests and 30 marks are based on two mid-term examinations. The first mid-term examination shall be from the first three
units of syllabus and second mid-term from the last three units of syllabus, conducted during the semester.
Two quiz or subjective tests, one before first mid-term examination from I & II units of syllabus and another before
second mid-term examination from IV & V units of syllabus, each for 10 marks, with 45 minutes duration, are
conducted in a semester and the average marks of the two tests are taken as the marks for the continuous evaluation
process.
Each mid-term examination is conducted for 40 marks with two hours duration. Each mid-term examination consists of
five questions, each for 10 marks and four questions need to be answered. First question shall have 5 short questions
from all the three units, each of two marks or 10 objective questions each of one mark and is compulsory, three
questions are of descriptive type, one from each unit of syllabus and the fifth question is from all the three units of
syllabus.
Sum of the 75% marks of better scored mid-term examination and 25% marks of less scored mid-term examination are
scaled down for 30 marks.
For the subjects such as Python Programming, Unix and Shell programming, Micro Processors and Micro Controllers
and Object Oriented Analysis and design etc., the distribution of 40 marks for internal evaluation shall be 20 marks for
day-to-day work, and 20 marks based on two mid-term examinations. Each mid-term examination is conducted for 40
marks with two hours duration. Sum of the 75% marks of better scored midterm examination and 25% marks of less
scored mid-term examination are scaled down for 20 marks.
For subjects like Functional English and Professional Communication, the pattern of mid-term examination is given
along with the syllabus of respective subject.
For the integrated course with theory and laboratory, the distribution of 40 marks for internal evaluation shall be 20
marks for theory based on two mid-term examinations and 20 marks for laboratory. Each mid-term examination is
conducted for 40 marks with two hours duration. Each mid-term examination consists of five questions, each for 10
marks and four questions need to be answered. First question shall have 5 short questions from all the three units, each
of two marks or 10 objective questions each of one mark and is compulsory, three questions are of descriptive type, one
from each unit of syllabus and the fifth question is from all the three units of syllabus. Sum of the 75% marks of better
scored mid-term examination and 25% marks of less scored mid-term examination are scaled down for 20 marks. Of 20
marks for laboratory, 10 marks for day-to-day performance and 10 marks for semester end internal examination.
For the project based theory course, the distribution of 40 marks for internal evaluation shall be 20 marks for theory,
based on two mid- term examinations and 20 marks for project. Each mid-term examination is conducted for 40 marks
with two hours duration. Each mid-term examination consists of five questions, each for 10 marks and four questions
need to be answered. First question shall have 5 short questions from all the three units, each of two marks or 10
objective questions each of one mark and is compulsory, three questions are of descriptive type, one from each unit of
syllabus and the fifth question is from all the three units of syllabus. Sum of the 75% marks of better scored mid-term
examination and 25% marks of less scored mid-term examination are scaled down for 20 marks.
This continuous assessment process helps the faculty member to monitor the knowledge attainment of students and also it
helps the students to prepare them for semester end examination and also gives the insight of overall understanding in the
respective course.
The answer scripts are evaluated by both the internal and external evaluators to assess the overall knowledge
attainment of student in respective of the course.
The external evaluators are utilized 50% for Question paper setting and 50% for evaluating the papers.
The internal evaluators are utilized 50% for Question paper setting and 50% for evaluating the papers.
For all UG courses, question papers include 50% questions on higher order thinking skills and 50% questions on
lower order thinking skills.
These question papers are scrutinized by the senior faculty handling the same subject in that particular semester.
Project identification:
The students may be attracted to the specific area by the following reasons,
Industrial visits.
Industrial/Practical Training.
Guest lecturers were conducted by the student association and professional societies such as IETE, ISTE,
etc.,
Seminars, symposium and workshop are also conducted in the home network and other institutions.
Project Review Committee (PRC) is constituted with a project coordinator and two other senior faculty members.
The PRC collects the areas of interest from faculty and students.
The PRC will finalize the areas of specialization to be covered before the start of VIII semester.
PRC formulate the batches with different levels of students based on their academic record in earlier semesters and
their interested areas.
The batch size may vary from 3 to 4.
The PRC allocates project guides and directs them for better quality projects .
During the process of identification of projects, a brief abstract and proposal of the project signed by the students and
supervisor concerned is collected in the prescribed proforma. Classification of the project based on application, product,
research, review etc. is obtained from the batch of students. The project students along with the supervisor defines the
project outcomes (Project COs) consideration of the factors such as environmental, safety, ethics, cost, standards and maps
the project outcomes with programme outcomes (POs) and programme Specific outcomes (PSOs).
PROFORMA
Project outcomes mapped with Programme Specific Outcomes (PSOs) and Programme Outcomes (POs)
Classification Application Product Research Review
of
Project
Note: Tick Appropriate category.
Project Outcomes
Outcome 1
Outcome 2
Mapping Table
Outcome 1
Outcome 2
Outcome 3
and so on
Note: Map each project outcomes with POs and PSOs with either 1 or 2 or 3 based on level of mapping as follows:
1-Slightly (Low) mapped 2-Moderately (Medium) mapped 3-Substantially (High) mapped
The students have to report on their project status to the concerned supervisor periodically.
Frequent reviews are conducted to review the status of project work and timely suggestions are given by the PRC.
The project batch should give a power point presentation during the review.
A project batch will submit the project report in the prescribed format.
Project evaluation
Project work shall be evaluated for 200 marks. Out of 200 marks, 80 marks shall be for internal evaluation and 120
marks for the assessment of project thesis and viva-voce examination.
Each student needs to give two seminars on the topic of his/her project and each seminar is evaluated for 40 marks
by the PRC of the department.
The sum of the marks of two seminars is taken as internal marks for 80.
The assessment of project thesis and viva-voce shall be conducted by the committee consisting of an external
examiner, Head of the Department and supervisor of the project. The evaluation of the project work shall be
conducted at the end of the fourth year second semester.
List of Projects
Few samples of projects and program outcome mapping are given below. The complete list of projects is given in the
Annexure II.
CAY (2018-2019)
P P P P P
Project PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PSO PSO
Project Title O O O O O
No. 1 2 4 6 8 10 12 1 2
3 5 7 9 11
1 Efficient Tour
Planning 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 3
System
2 INTELLIGENT
HEART
DISEASE
PREDICTION 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 2 3
USING DATA
MINING
TECHNIQUES
CAY (2017-2018)
CAY (2016-2017)
Project PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PSO PSO
Project Title
No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2
1 Home 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 3 3
automation
using IOT
2 Intelligent 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 3
Health
monitoring
system
Best Projects
2015 batch
Title of the
S.No. Name of the students Guide Name
Project work
S.SRIRAMYA(15481A1297)
P.AYYAN(15481A1289)
1. Secure locker Access Management R.APOORVA(15481A1294) Dr.Ch.Kavitha
L.YOGESH KUMAR(15481A1263)
M.VENKATESH(15481A1271)
K.VENKAT KASHYAP(15481A1260)
CH.SAI PRAVEEN(15481A1222) Mr.B.Sobhan
2 Campus World
A.HARSHITHA SAI(15481A1203) Babu
D.KRISHNA VAMSI(15481A1233)
D.DIMPLE
RAMANJANEYULU(15481A1234)
Moving Object Detection with
3 A.ANUSHA(15481A1210) Sri M.Nagaraju
spatiotemporal background priors
K.SRI LAKSHMI(15481A1247)
A.GOWTHAM(15481A1212)
2014 batch
Title of the
S.No. Name of the students Guide Name
Project work
2013 batch
S.No Title of the
Name of the students Guide Name
. Project work
APSSDC: CM’s Skill Excellence Centre (Computing lab) is established with 37 No.
High end laptop systems with following configuration: Acer TMP249-G2-M 7th generation - Intel core i5-
7200U processor @2.5GHZ (turbo boost up to 3.1Ghz) 2-cores /16GB RAM/500Gb HDD/14’’ monitors–
4GB or more with minimum 64gb/s memory bandwidth – OS: windows 10 64bits professional with HDD
type :SATA 500GB with speed 5400RPM & RAM 16GB with 2400MHZ.
Sri V.SUNIL KUMAR from Philips research Lab, Bangalore has delivered 15 hours of lectures on
machine learning on 26-12-2018 for IV IT Students.
Sri S. Sri Krishna from – Ernst and young technologies Pvt. Ltd, Hyderabad delivered a lecture on
“Enterprise Application Development Paradigms” to III and IV IT students on 29th March, 2019.
Initiatives taken:
Invited lectures are conducted to the students by inviting experts from core and IT industry. These lectures results
in lively discussion thus imparting current state of the art knowledge to the students and faculty members.
Online live lectures by experts from International industry are arranged for the students to acquire an global
knowledge in analytical courses like Engineering Electromagnetic, Transmission lines and wave guides which
motivates them to involve in research, projects.
Workshops are conducted for the students by the technical experts from industry to acquire and update the technical
skills required for the current trends.
Industrial visits are arranged for the students to give exposure on the industrial environment and work ethics.
Internships, Summer training or In plant training Students are allowed to undergo 2, 4, 6 or 12 weeks of
internship at Research Organizations / Government Training Institutes / Public Sector Units / Reputed Industries.
i) Internship
ii) Project workshop for students
iii) Industrial visits
iv) Students specific training
v) Faculty Development Program
IMPLEMENTATION DETAILS
MoU details
The department is having various MOUs with industries to improve the career opportunities of our students.
Impact Analysis:
Students can able to publish papers in national and international conferences and journals
Students won prizes in various state level, national and international level project design contest
Initiatives:
The department organizes industrial training and industrial visits for students once in a year/semester to relevant
organizations/companies to enable the students to experience the practical implementation of theoretical knowledge in real
world. (As per the policy in vogue, It can be mentioned that local industrial visits are planned for all third year students and
all India technical tours are planned for final year students. Example of industries generally visited by the department
students can also be mentioned.) This gives them an insight of exposure to the industrial environment and the work culture
ethics in Industries. The visits also help the students to learn about people management, which is essential in any
organization.
Implementation details:
Academic Year 2018-2019
S. Name of the Industry Sector of Govt. /Pvt. Date From Date To No. of
No. Industry Undertaking Students
ANIFRAMES Pvt. Ltd.,
26th
Mysore and Idexcel 29th
1 IT Private January, 52
Technologies January,2019
2019.
Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore
B. Internship:
Internship is encouraged among students through the implementation of choice based credit system and making following
changes in the curriculum.
Students are allowed to undergo 6 to 12 weeks of internship at Research Organizations / Government training
institutes / Public sector units / Reputed academic institutions / Reputed industries/ Industry oriented courses /
Online courses between semesters 6 and 7 during the summer vacation and can earn 2 credits.
The industry/organisation is to be selected with the approval of the department consultative committee. The
internship has to be taken on a continuous basis for the periods mentioned.
Students are encouraged to go for industry visit, implant training and to take up certification courses to update their
knowledge in latest technologies.
Faculty members interact with the industrial experts and give guidelines, suggestions, contact details of an
internship, provide the students recommendation letters and other necessary supports.
The alumni coordinator constantly interacts with alumni those who are working in the industries and request them to
provide necessary guidelines and supports for the internship of their juniors.
Industrial / Practical training shall be evaluated for a total of 100 marks. Of 100 marks, 40 marks shall be awarded
by an internal committee consisting of two faculty members based on the presentation given and work carried out by
a student and the remaining 60 marks are for final Viva–Voce examination conducted by the committee consisting
of an External Examiner and the Head of the Department at the end of IV B.Tech 1st semester.
Implementation details:
Overall
1 NSIC - Hyderabad 25
2 BSNL - Vijayawada 01
C. Impact analysis:
The student’s placement percentage has improved compared to the previous years.
A feedback is collected from all students who have undergone industrial training / internship.
The feedback is analyzed to identify the student community interests in selecting the companies for their career.
The feedback also explores the content to be revised in our new curriculum to bridge the gap between academics and
industry.
The feedback gives a good opportunity for the institute to improve the laboratory facilities and there by improves the
practical based teaching learning process.
The feedback improves the work culture in the students and they can better understand what the industry wants from
the employees.
Students can understand the latest industrial trends and can make them better fit to the industrial requirements when
they go for the employment.