REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES SCHOOL OF ARTS & SOCIAL SCIENCES
J.H. CERILLES STATE COLLEGE Bachelor of Science in Hospitality Management
PAGADIAN ANNEX Course Syllabus
Course Number:J.H Res. 2 Course Title: FEASIBILITY STUDY
Unit Credits : 3 units Credit Hours: 3 Hours Lecture
Term : 1st Semester AY 2020-2021 Pre-requisite: Res 1 (Feasibility Study 1)
JHCSC VISION Leading public higher education institution serving the ASEAN community with quality, innovative and culture-sensitive programs.
• Provide need-based tertiary and advanced programs in Agriculture, Education and allied fields;
JHCSC MISSION • Undertake applied research, extension and production services that yield workable and durable solutions to sector specific
challenges, thus improving the socio-economic well - being of identified communities.
SAS GOAL The College of Arts and Sciences objectively aims for:
• Provision of quality education and training to prospective professional of Zamboanga del sur;
• Strengthening of programs for the development of moral values, personal discipline and positive attitudes towards works as well
as harmonious relationships;
• Development of highly skilled and competent prospective leaders by providing them with the necessary knowledge and skills in
the field of discipline and the proper values and attitudes towards their fellowmen; and
• Development of the research capabilities of future professionals necessary in their quest for knowledge and truth.
• Design practical & functional curricula supported by strong domestic and international linkages that ensure high quality
education and professional training for employment and career advancement;
• Prepare hospitality industry leaders with personal integrity guided by ethical standards in the advocacy of social justice and
SAS OBJECTIVES
equity characterized by honesty, courtesy, humility and responsibility;
(HM)
• Formulate programs that would produce holistic individuals ready to cope with the challenges of the changing demands of the
hospitality and tourism industry.
Inculcate among HRM family the love of God, countrymen, family, and strong sense of patriotism.
• Produce food products and services complying with enterprise standards.
• Apply management skills in F& B service operation.
• Perform and provide full guest cycle services for front office
PROGRAM OUTCOMES
• Perform and maintain various housekeeping services for guest and facility operation.
• Plan and implement a risk management program to provide a safe and secure workplace.
• Provide food and beverage service and manage the operation seamlessly base on industry standards.
COURSE DESCRIPTION This course aims to provide knowledge on feasibility study parts and practices as well as actual presentation of feasibility paper
COURSE OUTCOMES After each unit lesson, the student will be able to:
1. Demonstrate proficiency in feasibility study
2. Apply the basic principles of the results of the study conducted
3. Create hard bound copy of the feasibility study as a course requirement
4. Appreciate and value the study conducted
I. Course Content
Time
Teaching and Learning Modalities
Intended Learning Topic Frame Outcomes-Based Instructional
Outcomes (ILO) (Weekly/Lesson/Chapter) Laboratory Assessment Materials
Lec Lab Face to Face Online Blended
Activities
Course Content 1: Institutional Orientation
➢ VMGO, • National and Regional Students to recite Students to orally Students to
Class orally one by one recite the submit online
Development Goals
Description, the institution’s institution’s reflection paper
Class • JHCSC’s Vision and VMGO VMGO
and recite in
Policies and individually ❖ Oral Recitation ❖ PowerPoint
Mission 3 class
another through a virtual ❖ Reflection Paper presentation
classroom • SAS’s Goals, conference
related
introduction Objectives and
Academic Policies
Course Content 2: Midterm Coverage
Week 1
➢ Discuss the
importance • Orientation and ❖ Feasibility
and Assessment
significance of • Discuss in • Discuss online • Follow-up studies
class the the assessment ❖ Discussion (unpublished
feasibility
3 importance importance via online and ❖ Self-
study materials)
of feasibility of feasibility submit hard assessment
➢ Identify the
study study copy output ❖ internet
current status
of feasibility
outputs
Week 2 • Evaluation of Outputs ❖ Feasibility
• Follow-up
assessment
studies
➢ Evaluate (unpublished
• Actual- • Online- via online
current outputs 3 ❖ Self-assessment
assessment assessment and submit materials)
submitted
hard copy ❖ internet
output
Week 3-5 • Survey of Target ❖ Feasibility
➢ Perform and Market • Follow-up
❖ Actual field studies
conduct survey • Actual field assessment
9 • Online survey visit
to target • Data Gathering
visit via online
❖ Brainstorming (unpublished
markets and submit materials)
➢ Evaluate the hard copy ❖ internet
data gathered output
Week 6-7 ❖ Feasibility
Follow-up studies
➢ Analyze the • Analysis of Results assessment via (unpublished
collected data 6 • Classroom • Online
online and
❖ Brainstorming
Assignment Assignment ❖ Recording materials)
submit hard
copy output ❖ internet
Week 8-9 ❖ Feasibility
Follow-up studies
• Computation of • Online ❖ Brainstorming
• Compute data • Classroom assessment via (unpublished
Projections and Assignment ❖ Recording
gathered using 6 Assignment online and
forecast • Online ❖ Oral Defense materials)
forecasting • Oral Defense submit hard
defense (midterm) ❖ internet
and copy output
projections
Course Content 3: Final Term Coverage
Week 10-12
❖ Feasibility
Follow-up studies
• Compute the assessment via
data gathered • Computation of • Classroom • Online ❖ Brainstorming (unpublished
9 online and
using Financial Aspects Assignment Assignment ❖ Recording materials)
submit hard
accounting copy output ❖ internet
method
(chapter 5)
Week 13-14 • Finalization of paper ❖ Feasibility
Follow-up studies
• Evaluate the assessment via (unpublished
content of the 6 • Classroom • Online
online and
❖ Brainstorming
Assignment Assignment ❖ Recording materials)
full paper submit hard
copy output ❖ internet
Week 15-18
• Online Follow-up
• Classroom
• Conduct final • Checking and
Assignment
Assignment assessment via ❖ Brainstorming
oral defense Submission of Final 12 • Final online and ❖ Final Oral
• Final Oral
after paper paper Online submit hard Defense
Defense
submission is defense copy output
accepted
Total No. of Hours 54
II. COURSE REQUIREMENTS:
1. Hardbound Paper
2. Compilation of corrected paper
3. Oral/Final Defense
III. EVALUATION CRITERIA:
Online Offline:
Paper - 55% (Rubrics Attached) Paper - 50%
Presentation - 35% Presentation - 35%
Communication - 10% Ouput/miniature - 15%
Total = 100% Total = 100%
COURSE POLICIES:
A. ONLINE
1. Attendance
2. Oral Presentation and Other Activities
3. Use of Cellular Phones and Other Portable Digital Gadgets
B. For Face to Face Blended Class:
1. Oral Presentation
2. Final Paper
3. Hardbound
IV. REFERENCES:
1. Feasibility studies (unpublished materials)
2. internet
Date Prepared Prepared: Reviewed: Recommending Approval: Approved:
(for old
subjects)
Date Revised:
(for newly JULITO V. MANDAC JR, DM MYRNA V. CEÑO, MBA JULIETA A. CEBRERO, Ph. D LINA T. CODILLA, Ph.D.
offered Faculty BSHM Program In-Charge Dean, School of Arts and Sciences Vice President for Academic
subjects) Affairs
______2020
Date Shown: Shown by: Shown to:
_____ 2020 JULITO V. MANDAC JR, DM ----------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------
Faculty Position Student Student Student
Appendix 1
RUBRICS (Online)
FEASIBILITY STUDY (FINAL DEFENSE)
Name: Paper Title:
Paper
46% - 55% 36% - 45% 26%-35% 25% and below
Demonstrate excellent paper output Demonstrate very satisfactory rating of output Output has satisfactory rating Output is less satisfactory or unacceptable
Output is free from errors in spelling and Output has minimal errors in spelling and Output has major errors in spelling and Output has more than 75% errors from spelling and
grammars grammars grammars grammars
Followed correct format Followed correct format Does not follow correct format Followed different format
Arrangement and organization are observed Less organize output Unorganized output Output is considered for major revision
Presentation
Ability to answer Questions Clarity of Communication
35% Clearly convinced the panel on the ideas stated 10% Communicated clearly in English, excellent organization of ideas
25% Partially convinced the panel on the ideas stated 8% Communicated well in English but ideas are not well organized
20% Not totally convincing ideas 6% Communicated in other vernacular and ideas are not well organized
15% and Responded to questions but ideas are irrelevant 5% and Communicated in a vernacular and unorganized ideas
below below
Total score: /100
Appendix 2
RUBRICS (Face to Face)
FEASIBILITY STUDY (FINAL DEFENSE)
Name: Paper Title: Adviser:
Paper
46% - 50% 36% - 45% 26%-35% 25% and below
Demonstrate excellent paper output Demonstrate very satisfactory rating of output Output has satisfactory rating Output is less satisfactory or unacceptable
Output is free from errors in spelling and Output has minimal errors in spelling and Output has major errors in spelling and Output has more than 75% errors from spelling and
grammars grammars grammars grammars
Followed correct format Followed correct format Does not follow correct format Followed different format
Arrangement and organization are observed Less organize output Unorganized output Output is considered for major revision
Presentation
Ability to answer Questions, Communication and overall Presentation
35% Clearly convinced the panel on the ideas stated and Communicated clearly in English, excellent organization of ideas
25% Partially convinced the panel on the ideas stated and Communicated well in English but ideas are not well organized
20% Not totally convincing ideas and Communicated in other vernacular and ideas are not well organized
15% and Responded to questions but ideas are irrelevant and Communicated in a vernacular and unorganized ideas
below
Miniature and Sample Products
Miniature and Sample Products
10% Complete, excellent miniature and sample products
8% Partly complete, very satisfactory miniature and products
6% Partly complete but satisfactory miniature and products
5% Incomplete and unsatisfactory miniature and products
4% and Products and miniature is irrelevant to the study
Below
Total: 100
_______ Passed ____ Failed _______ Minimum Revision ________ Major Revision
