Assigment 2-8616
Assigment 2-8616
(8616)
Level: B. ED
Question 1: what strategies can supervisor use to help teacher view evaluation as a
way of improving instructional opportunities for students?
1) Pedagogical Skills: These include mastery of subject matter, teaching methods, improvisation,
presentation of content, preparation of lesson notes, lesson plans and units etc.
2) Evaluation Skills: These include questioning, continuous assessment and examination skills.
3) Disciplinary Skills: These include class control, punishment, use of rules and regulations and
maintenance of order.
4) Motivational Skills: Issues bordering on rewards and reinforcement are emphasized.
5) Reportorial Skills: Documentation of report card, class register, log book, attendance book etc.
6) Managerial Skills: These are skills on time management, good use of teaching aids, difficult situation,
and students behavior.
7) Interactive Skills: Creation of rapport, teacher’s personality and general characteristics, cooperation
etc.
8) Analytical Skills: Possession of mathematical ability, statistical computation and interpretation of
data etc.
The importance of acquiring these skills cannot be left to chance or in the hands of charlatans or
mediocre. This informs the need to improve on the skills of school supervisors in order to achieve the
objectives of primary education in Nigeria. Duties of School Supervisors In a nutshell, the
responsibilities of the heads supervisors could be outlined as follows According to Guynm (1981)
1. Helping teachers and stimulating curriculum improvement
2. Emphasizing the use of group process with teachers, students and other school personnel.
3. Performing administrative functions only to help instructions through in-service.
4. Teaching of teachers for improving instruction through inservice. Igwe (2001) noted that supervision
involves evaluation, monitoring and quality control for the purpose of curriculum and infrastructural
development and improvement.
In order to achieve this, some specific tasks of the supervisor in a modern school have been identified
and listed here under; a) Helping school head teachers to understand students better b) Helping
teachers and individuals for professional growth c) Acquiring cooperating spirit for team work d)
Making better use of teaching materials e) Improving methods of teaching f) Improving teacher’s
appraisal of his standards g) Acquisition of originality for the teacher within the commodity. h) Faculty
plan for curriculum improvement The common denominator in the objectives of supervision as
outlined above is to help teachers become more effective in planning their class work in terms of
utilizing maximally, textbooks and other basic materials and curricular aids as well as helping teachers
with guidance and evaluation.
Strategies use to help teacher view evaluation
Effective intra-school supervision is based on identifying certain criteria areas that if well supervised,
would help improve the quality of primary school education.
The Nature of Lesson Plan The lesson plan is a reflection of the level of preparedness as well as the
effort the teacher made in gathering information for the lesson. So a poorly written lesson plan not
only indicates the quality of the teacher, but also the level of commitment to his primary task of
teaching. The school head (principal) must critically examine the following items of the lesson plan.
iv. The Relationship between Teacher and Student Without doubt, a harmonious interpersonal
relationship between teachers and students could engender learning and attainment of
educational goals. In this regard, the principal must seek for genuine love and concern, positive and
acceptable disposition between and among the teachers and students. His ability to accommodate
or tolerate and, if possible, lend a helping hand through guidance and counseling services must be
considered.
v. Classroom Management Effective classroom
management facilitates teaching and learning process. The principal or other appointed school
personnel must be conversant with the following: a) Ability to discipline and control students, b)
Reward skills to reinforce good performance or conduct, c) Ability to identify cases and causes of
students mis-behaviour, d) Creation of conducive classroom climate, e) Sitting arrangement of
students, f) Classroom physical condition
vi. Personality of the Teacher Teacher’s personality includes among things his personal traits or
characteristics, emotional status, appearance, intelligence, physique, leadership skills,
communication skills, etc.
Question 2: How financial audit & academic audit are different? Explain your answer
keeping in mind different aspects?
Subjecting your business for regular third-party review and evaluation helps your small business
successfully evolve. External reviews allow you to observe problems within your business that you
might not see because you are in the midst of the business. Whether for financial or academic
purposes, audits examine activities against set criteria and standards. Successful audits must be
independent, must have a set method and must be documented.
Financial Audits Financial audits evaluate financial statements and provide third-party opinions on
the truthfulness of these statements. Auditors test various claims against relevant accounting
standards to provide this opinion. All financial statements are based on these accounting standards.
The assertions include accuracy of the numbers, existence of the assets and liabilities, completeness
of the numbers and actual occurrence of transactions. In short, auditors check the entire accounting
process through which these numbers are placed on your financial statements.
Financial audits dig deep into an institutions/organization’s financial situation, probing accounting
records, internal controls policies, cash holdings and other sensitive financial areas. Publicly-traded
corporations are subject to external financial audits on a regular basis, and even privately owned
small businesses can be subjected to an external financial audit by the IRS or other government
authority. Knowing how to perform a financial audit on your own books can help you to prepare
for a possible external audit, keep your accounting system in order and discourage internal fraud
and theft.
1. Review the systems put in place to transmit financial information to the accounting
department. The first step in the accounting cycle is to gather financial documentation, such
as sales receipts, invoices and bank statements, and forward it to the accounting department
for processing. Without timely and reliable information, accounting records can become
unreliable themselves, creating inconsistencies in a company's financial records.
2. Look into the company's record-keeping policies and check to ensure records are being
stored properly. Small businesses should keep at least an electronic photocopy of cash
register tapes, cancelled checks, invoices and other financial documentation until the end
of the current accounting period. Make sure that archived records can be accessed quickly
to shed light on any potential issues that arise.
3. Identify and review each element of the company's accounting system, including
individual T-accounts (debits and credits), journal entries, the general ledger and current
financial statements. Systematically work through the accounting system to ensure that
all necessary accounts are present, that T-accounts are posted to the general ledger in a
timely manner and that the system has the ability to correct human errors, such as
arithmetic mistakes.
4. Check into the institution’s internal controls policies to gauge the level of protection they
provide from corruption. Internal switch policies include things like separation of
accounting duties between different employees, locked safes for holding pending bank
deposits and password-protected accounting software that tracks exactly who does what
and when.
5. Compare internal chronicles of cash holdings, income and expenses against external records.
Check the company's stored external records and compare selected transactions against
internal records. Compare purchase receipts sent from suppliers for a certain month
against internal purchase records, for example, or compare cash register tapes against
revenue recorded on the books.
6. Analyze the institution’s internal tax records and official tax returns. Tax records should
be kept for seven years to be on the safe side. Browse through the company's tax receipts
from the IRS and compare it against records of tax liabilities and taxes paid in the
company's accounting records. Take a little extra time to review the range of credits and
deductions claimed on the most recent tax return, looking for areas of dubious reporting,
such as inflated expense numbers.
Academic Audit
Academics are short-term efforts, and their ultimate goal is to create unique outputs for your
business. Academic audits, therefore, observe the true status of academic cost, schedule, scope and
quality. They identify issues and problems that may hinder your business’ academic development,
and then provide solutions to improve the performance of that academic. First, academic auditors
identify the success parameters and then interview the core academic members and relevant
investors. Next they analyze the issues, challenges and opportunities using information they gained
from interviews and academic documents. Finally, auditors develop reports that they present to
management.
The Academic Audit, like more traditional program reviews, is a peer review process including a self-
study and a site visit by peers from outside the institution. However, the similarities end there.
Unlike the traditional approach to program evaluation, this process emphasizes self-reflection and
self-improvement rather than compliance with predetermined standards. The purpose of an
academic audit is to encourage departments or programs to evaluate their “education quality
processes” – the key faculty activities required to produce, assure, and regularly improve the quality
of teaching and learning.
An audit asks how faculty approach educational decision-making and how they organize their work,
using the resources available to them and working collegially to provide a quality education in the
best interests of the discipline and student learning.
Purpose of the Academic Audit:
The objective of academic audit is to evaluate the performance of the institution and to identify the
issues that are to be attended in order to improve the quality of teaching and Research. The
following are the major objectives of abstract audit:
1. To understand the existing system and assess the strengths and weaknesses of the Departments
and Administrative Units and to suggest the methods for improvement and for overcoming the
weaknesses while teaching, learning and evaluation, student support and progression.
2. To ascertain whether the Departments/centers are functioning efficiently and effectively with
proven records of capacity building, research projects and publications and extension over a period
of time or not.
3. To identify the bottlenecks in the existing administrative mechanisms and to identify the
opportunities for academic reforms, administrative reforms and examination reforms for a long
term progression with excellence and to face the challenges of Internationalization in higher
education.
4. To evaluate the optimum utilization of financial and other resources, issues concerning with
leadership and organization, functional autonomy and financial management.
5. To suggest the methods of improvement for maintaining quality in higher education.
Main Differences
The differences in financial audits and academic audits are in their objectives. While financial audits
seek financial statement accuracy, academic audits seek to unearth and resolve academic problems.
The methods used in either case similarly are largely different. Unlike academic audits, financial
auditing uses a range of substantive procedures. Additionally, businesses submit to financial
auditing activities because of statutory or regulatory pressures. However, business owners,
managers and stakeholders initiate academic audits to ensure that academic activities remain on
track.
Other Differences
Financial audits are mainly close-ended exercises. This means that auditors focus only on verifying
the financial information. Conversely, academic audits are open-ended, consultative exercises.
Academic auditors act as consultants who try to add value to academics and business by suggesting
improvements and ways to close gaps. Depending on the academic type, the auditor must have
relevant expertise and skills to provide meaningful output. For example, a academic auditor who
has no knowledge of trigonometry and design might have difficulties performing academic audits of
the world’s tallest buildings.
Question 3: How synergistic supervision improves the performance of students and
teachers?
Synergistic Supervision
Synergistic supervision has been described as having the greatest utility for working with student
affairs professionals. Its cooperative nature allows joint effects to exceed the combination of
individual efforts. Important characteristics of synergistic supervision include:
Dual Focus - Staff members need to feel that they have a significant influence on selecting and
defining the goals of the unit and in devising strategies to accomplish them. If staff members
perceive goals as being imposed on them, they may not make a personal investment in trying to
achieve the goals of the unit.
Joint Effort - Supervision is not something done to staff but rather a cooperative activity in which
each party has an important input to make. Plans for accomplishing tasks such as determining unit
priorities, scheduling and distributing work and coordinating the efforts of the division are worked
out jointly between the supervisor and the staff member.
Two-way Communication - In the synergistic model of staffing practices, supervision is dependent
upon a high level of trust between staff members and supervisors. Staff members must be willing
to allow supervisors to learn personal information about them.
Staff members must also feel free to give their supervisors honest, direct feedback. Communication
is key in developing this trust.
Synergistic supervision can be defined as a cooperative effort between the supervisor and
supervisee with a focus on joint-effort, two-way communication, and competency and goals (for the
betterment of the organization and individual).Emergent Themes Compared with Characteristics of
Synergistic Supervision is as follows:
• Supervisor Accessibility (Helping Process)
• Meaningful Interaction with Supervisor (Cooperative Effort)
• Utilization of Formal Evaluations (Focus on Competence / Goals)
• Providing Unique Supervision (Joint Effort / Two-way Communication)
• Providing Professional Development Opportunities
The learning-teaching synergy happens when teachers are thinking, observing, and focusing in all
sorts of ways on learning—when we are constantly asking, “What’s going to help students learn
this?” This focus on learning and attempts to understand how it’s happening for students drives
decision-making about teaching. It is what determines whether students will work in groups,
whether they need to write or speak answers, whether their understanding of a concept should be
tested, and on and on. Teachers become learners of learning. We have always been learners of
content, but now in every class we seek to better understand the relationship between the learning
experiences of students and the instructional approaches we are using.
The teaching-learning synergy happens when students are focused on learning—what
they are learning (the content and skills of the course) and how they are learning it. Both
are important. Students need to develop an understanding of themselves as learners. The
synergy happens when students are learning from and with others. They are learning from
the teacher who has relevant experiences and expertise. They are also learning from classmates
who offer explanations that make sense to novice learners and use examples that beginners find
meaningful. When classmates act as teachers, their confidence grows, as does the confidence of
those learning from them. Through this synergy student discover that they can figure things out for
themselves.
The synergy happens when teachers are open to learning from students. Sometimes (not all the
time) a student asks a question, offers an example, or shares an insight and the teacher learns
something new about the content. More often students are instructing the teacher about learning—
what content causes them confusion, what examples aren’t meaningful, and what assignments
don’t generate much engagement. On the other side they’re also able to help us understand the
things that inspire them to learn, and the tactics that help them to do so.
Synergy Education Solution works directly with educators, professional and parent organizations,
and publishers to improve students’ learning and achievement in our nations’ schools. Synergy
offers services that focus on the integration of evidence-based assessment and instructional
programs, professional development for teachers and educational leaders, and strategies for the
implementation of effective programs. Synergy works closely with educational leaders at state and
federal levels in developing initiatives and policies that are informed by current research and assists
institutions of higher education in building graduate programs that enhance the teaching graduate
programs that in turn enhance the teaching effectiveness and leadership abilities of educational
professionals.
The learning-teaching synergy happens when teachers are thinking, observing, and focusing in all
sorts of ways on learning—when we are constantly asking, “What’s going to help students learn
this?” This focus on learning and attempts to understand how it’s happening for students drives
decision-making about teaching. It is what determines whether students will work in groups,
whether they need to write or speak answers, whether their understanding of a concept should be
tested, and on and on. Teachers become learners of learning. We have always been learners of
content, but now in every class we seek to better understand the relationship between the learning
experiences of students and the instructional approaches we are using.
The teaching-learning synergy happens when students are focused on learning—what they are
learning (the content and skills of the course) and how they are learning it. Both are important.
Students need to develop an understanding of themselves as learners. The synergy happens when
students are learning from and with others. They are learning from the teacher who has relevant
experiences and expertise. They are also learning from classmates who offer explanations that make
sense to novice learners and use examples that beginners find meaningful. When classmates act as
teachers, their confidence grows, as does the confidence of those learning from them. Through this
synergy student discover that they can figure things out for themselves.
The synergy happens when teachers are open to learning from students. Sometimes (not all the
time) a student asks a question, offers an example, or shares an insight and the teacher learns
something new about the content. More often students are instructing the teacher about learning—
what content causes them confusion, what examples aren’t
meaningful, and what assignments don’t generate much engagement. On the other side, they’re
also able to help us understand the things that inspire them to learn, and the tactics that help them
to do so.
Synergy Education Solution works directly with educators, professional and parent organizations,
and publishers to improve students’ learning and achievement in our nations’ schools. Synergy
offers services that focus on the integration of evidence-based assessment and instructional
programs, professional development for teachers and educational leaders, and strategies for the
implementation of effective programs. Synergy works closely with educational leaders at state and
federal levels in developing initiatives and policies that are informed by current research and assists
institutions of higher education in building graduate programs that enhance the teaching graduate
programs that in turn enhance the teaching effectiveness and leadership abilities of educational
professionals.
Question 4: Discuss in detail Developmental model of supervision and give your opinion
about this model?
A developmental approach to teaching and learning is simply put catering to the needs of
the individual learner through an individualized program that works with their development long a
range of measures:
➢ Cognitive – their brain readiness for mastery of existing concepts and introduction to new
Australian Curriculum challenges
➢ Physical – the physical gross and fine motor skills needed for a range of learning and social skills
➢ Moral Development – developing empathy and compassion
➢ Ego Development – understanding of the self in the world (e.g. time, space, selfreflection)
➢ Faith Development – belief in how their world is controlled (Ghosts and monsters
or logical reasoning)
➢ Emotional and Social Development – self-awareness and self-management of emotions and
working with others
➢ Self-Direction – understanding of learning needs and ways of working (learning styles and
organizational skills)
Development cannot be forced or ignored. If we try and work more than one level of development
beyond where the child is at it will just sound like nonsense and they won’t
understand. If we try to push them to the next level they will keep returning to the previous one
whenever they are stressed.
You cannot skip a level, you need to be in it and explore it and find out that there are better ways
to think and do that you can see other’s do. When your level stops working you move to the next
one. Experiential learning is key to the process. So we look at the individual child’s readiness to
identify where they need to be within the BIS cultural expectations for moral development and
community participation and where they need to be to fit societal expectations of the Australia
Curriculum.
This Means in Practice:
➢ We don’t race children through when they are not ready – we wait and support them but
always show them the next level for them to aspire
➢ We work with them to develop the areas they need to and harness those that they excel
within, giving them time to master skills
➢ We learn to understand them as they will have the same teacher for much of their schooling
who gets to understand their idiosyncrasies and learns how to motivate and extend them
➢ We find out about your learning preferences and use them actively in your learning program
➢ We put in limits when they need it and take them away when they need to stretch their wings
and fly
➢ We listen to their body patterns and physical needs, allowing them to eat when hungry and go
to the toilet whenever they need
➢ We have four basic school rules to follow and know that depending on your age,
developmental level and understanding those rules will need different explanations and
consequences.
The underlying premise of developmental models of supervision is the notion that individuals are
continuously growing. In combining our experience with hereditary predispositions we develop
strengths and growth areas. The objective of supervision from this perspective is to maximise and
identify growth needed for the future. Thus, it is typical to be continuously identifying new areas
of growth in a life-long learning process as a clinical practitioner.
Studies revealed that behaviour of supervisors changed as supervisees gained experience, and the
supervisory relationship also changed. There appeared to be a scientific basis for developmental
trends and patterns in supervision. In general, the developmental model of supervision defines
progressive stages of supervisee development from beginner to expert, with each stage consisting
of discrete characteristics and skills.
For example, supervisees at the beginner stage would be expected to have limited skills and lack
confidence as counsellors, while middle stage supervisees might have more skill and confidence
and have conflicting feelings about perceived independence/dependence on the supervisor. A
supervisee at the expert end of the developmental spectrum is likely to utilise good problem-
solving skills and be deeply reflective and intuitive about the counselling and supervisory process
(Haynes, Corey, & Moulton, 2003, Jones, 2008).
Developmental supervision is based on the following two assumptions:
In the process of becoming competent, the counsellor will progress though a number of stages
that are qualitatively different from each other;
Each stage requires a qualitatively different environment for optimum growth to occur.
Stoltenberg and Delworth (1987) described a developmental model with three levels of
supervisees: beginning, intermediate, and advanced. Within each level the authors noted a trend.
The beginner supervisee would tend to function in a rigid, shallow, imitative way and then over
time move toward more competence, self-assurance, and self-reliance.
Areas of focus in the observation of development includes the supervisees development in (1) self-
and-other awareness, (2) motivation, and (3) autonomy. For example, a beginner psychotherapist
who was beginning supervision for the first time would tend to be relatively dependent on the
supervisor for client diagnoses and in establishing plans for therapy.
Intermediate supervisees would tend to have dependence on their supervisors for only the more
difficult clients. Resistance, avoidance, and/or conflict is typical of the intermediate stage of
supervisee development, because self-concept is easily threatened. Advanced supervisees
function far more independently, seeking consultation when appropriate, and take responsibility
for their correct and incorrect decisions.
For supervisors employing a developmental approach to supervision, the key is to accurately
identify the supervisee’s current phase of development and provide feedback and support
appropriate to that developmental stage. While doing this, it is also important to facilitate the
supervisee’s progression to the next stage (Stoltenberg & Delworth, 1987).
To this end, a supervisor uses an interactive process, often referred to as “scaffolding” which
encourages the supervisee to use prior knowledge and skills (the scaffold) to guide them on to the
development of new knowledge and skills. As the supervisee approaches mastery of each stage of
development, the supervisor gradually moves the scaffold to incorporate knowledge and skills
from the next stage. Throughout this process, not only is the supervisee exposed to new
information and counselling skills, the contact between supervisor and supervisee also fosters the
development of advanced critical thinking skills and effective reflective practice principles.
It is important to note that while the developmental process of the supervisee appears linear, it is
not. This is because in reality a supervisee may be in different stages simultaneously. For example,
the supervisee may be predominately at an intermediate level overall, but experience the
attributes of a beginner when faced with a new, more complex and challenging client situation.
The table below offers an overview of the typical attributes found within each of the three primary
levels of development within the supervisee.
An essential task of a professional school counselor is the commitment to continuous professional
development. Within the school setting school counselors get pulled in many different directions.
Taking the time to attend to the emotional needs of students can sometimes get lost as counselors
prioritize academic or career needs. An emphasis on the development and refinement of
counseling skills can help school counselors become more competent counselors. Stoltenberg,
McNeil, and Delworth (1998) identify eight domains of clinical practice: intervention skills
competence, assessment techniques, interpersonal assessment, client conceptualization,
individual differences, theoretical orientation, treatment plans and goals, and professional ethics.
The opportunity for a supervisor to help the school counselor measure their development within
each of these domains in addition to providing an environment conducive to growth, will not only
improve the supervisee’s self-confidence but also their ability to provide more effective counseling
with their students (Stoltenberg et al., 1998). The supervisor/supervisee relationship allows the
school counselor opportunities to talk about the mental health needs of their students. School
counselors can begin to feel disconnected to the world of higher academia after graduating from
their school counseling programs and therefore, may no longer be connected to the latest
research and developments in these areas. The IDM model helps identify the areas of growth they
can focus on. Stoltenberg, McNeil, and Delworth’s (1998) model of supervision provides a
significant amount of information regarding the common obstacles supervisees encounter and
strategies for the supervisor to help them avoid or overcome these in the future. For example, in
the area of professional ethics, supervisees may struggle with limits of confidentiality in counseling
sessions with adolescents. Supervisors can help the supervisee determine how to best handle this
situation by using probing questions and helping them discover how ethical codes as defined by
ASCA might help them navigate this situation. In the domain area of individual differences,
supervisors can help supervisees take notice of how cultural influences, such as low socio-
economic status, race, ethnicity, gender identity, or religious affiliation, might impact a student’s
access to resources or general wellbeing. For example, these resources could include tutoring,
information on the local food bank, or a private place to perform a spiritual practice during
specified times of the day. These are new experiences for the supervisee, and a counselor with the
knowledge of how “school” influences can affect a child, can be a great asset to a counselor-in-
training. Lastly, understanding how school culture can affect counseling plans and goals is
important. Supervisors can help supervisees understand how counseling plans work within the
school setting, the different school personnel or stakeholders that might play a role in the plan,
and how to work within the parameters of the school environment.
Question 5: write your understandings about?