Elementary Example

Teaching Performance Profile and Rating (Form 3)

Teacher Name: John Doe EIN: 00001 Fall Formative Spring Formative
Final Summative
Formal Observation #1 Formal Observation #2
School: Canyon Elementary School Year: 2012-13
Due no later than March 31
Date: 10/28/12 Date: 2/4/13
Grade/Subject/Dept: 5th Grade

Evaluator: Mr. Smith Status: Probationary Continuing

Developing

Developing

Developing
Ineffective

Ineffective

Ineffective
Effective

Effective

Effective

Effective

Effective
effective
Highly

Highly

Highly
Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
1a: Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy X X X
1b: Demonstrating Knowledge of Students X X X
1c: Setting Instructional Outcomes X X X
1d: Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources X X X
1e: Designing Coherent Instruction X X X
1f: Designing Student Assessments X X X
Domain 2: The Classroom Environment
2a: Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport X X X
2b: Establishing a Culture for Learning X X X
2c: Managing Classroom Procedures X X X
2d: Managing Student Behavior X X X
2e: Organizing Physical Space X X X
Domain 3: Instruction
3a: Communicating with Students X X X
3b: Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques X X X
3c: Engaging Students in Learning X X X
3d: Using Assessment in Instruction X X X
3e: Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness X X X
Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities
4a: Reflecting on Teaching X X X
4b: Maintaining Accurate Records X X X
4c: Communicating with Families X X X
4d: Participating in a Professional Community X X X
4e: Growing and Developing Professionally X X X
4f: Showing Professionalism X X X

Teaching Performance Rating Based on Final Summative

Ineffective (0) Developing (1) Effective (2) Highly Effective (3)

1 or 2 Ineffective ratings Zero Ineffective ratings and fewer than 4 At least 7 Highly Effective ratings
3 or more Ineffective ratings or Developing ratings and
4 or more Developing ratings Zero Ineffective and Developing ratings

Teaching Performance Rating

2
 Elementary Example

5th Grade AIMS Percent Growth Percentile Student Academic Progress Profile and Rating (Form 4)
Results for Meets/Exceeds
Individual Teacher
Teacher: John Doe School Year: 2012-13 EIN: 00001
Reading 92% 33%
School: Canyon Elementary Grade/Subject/Dept: 5th Grade

Evaluator: Mr. Smith Status: Probationary Continuing

Writing 58%

Student Academic Progress Profile

Math 37% 62% Measurement Ineffective (0) Developing (1) Highly
Effective (2)
Effective (3)

Using Appendix H-Student Academic Progress Cut AIMS

Reading
Scores, the evaluator and teacher select the student
achievement scores that result in the highest rubric
score for each content area.
AIMS
Writing

Reading 92% Meets/Exceeds-Rubric Score 3

AIMS
Writing 58% Meets/Exceeds-Rubric Score 1 Math

Math 62% Growth-Rubric Score 2

3+1+2 = 6 =2
Student Academic Progress Rating 2
(Total of Rubric Scores divided by Number of Rubric Scores)
3 3
 Elementary Example

Continuous School Improvement Profile and Rating (Form 5) Final Teacher Evaluation Rating (Form 9)

Teacher: John Doe School Year: 2012-13 EIN: 00001 Teacher: John Doe School Year: 2012-13 EIN: 00001

School: Canyon Elementary Grade/Subject/Dept: 5th Grade School: Canyon Elementary Grade/Subject/Dept: 5th Grade

Evaluator: Mr. Smith Status: Probationary Continuing Evaluator: Mr. Smith Status: Probationary Continuing

Teaching Performance (60%)

Elementary
2 X .60 1.2
Not Effective (0) Developing (1) Effective (2) Highly Effective (3)
Teaching Performance Rating
15 or fewer goals 16-22 goals achieved 23-28 goals 29-42 goals achieved Student Academic Progress (33%)
achieved achieved
2 X .33 .66
Student Academic Progress Rating

Continuous School Improvement (7%)

Junior High +
1 X .07 .07
Not Effective (0) Developing (1) Effective (2) Highly Effective (3) Continuous School Improvement Rating

6 or fewer goals 7-10 goals achieved 11-14 goals 15-21 goals achieved
Final Teacher Evaluation Numerical Score 1.93
achieved achieved
Final Teacher Evaluation Rating

Ineffective Developing Effective Highly Effective

High School
Greater than or Greater than or
Less than .8 equal to .8 equal to 1.7 Greater than or
Not Effective (0) Developing (1) Effective (2) Highly Effective (3) and and equal to 2.5
less than 1.7 less than 2.5
6 or fewer goals 7-10 goals achieved 11-13 goals 14-20 goals achieved
achieved achieved
Final Teacher Evaluation Rating Effective

Evaluator Signature Teacher Signature

Continuous School Improvement Rating

1 Date Date
 Secondary Example

Teaching Performance Profile and Rating (Form 3)

Teacher Name: Jane Doe EIN: 00001 Fall Formative Spring Formative
Final Summative
Formal Observation #1 Formal Observation #2
School: Canyon High School School Year: 2012-13
Due no later than March 31
Date: 10/28/12 Date: 2/4/13
Grade/Subject/Dept: History Teacher

Evaluator: Mr. Smith Status: Probationary Continuing

Developing

Developing

Developing
Ineffective

Ineffective

Ineffective
Effective

Effective

Effective

Effective

Effective
effective
Highly

Highly

Highly
Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
1a: Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy X X X
1b: Demonstrating Knowledge of Students X X X
1c: Setting Instructional Outcomes X X X
1d: Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources X X X
1e: Designing Coherent Instruction X X X
1f: Designing Student Assessments X X X
Domain 2: The Classroom Environment
2a: Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport X X X
2b: Establishing a Culture for Learning X X X
2c: Managing Classroom Procedures X X X
2d: Managing Student Behavior X X X
2e: Organizing Physical Space X X X
Domain 3: Instruction
3a: Communicating with Students X X X
3b: Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques X X X
3c: Engaging Students in Learning X X X
3d: Using Assessment in Instruction X X X
3e: Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness X X X
Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities
4a: Reflecting on Teaching X X X
4b: Maintaining Accurate Records X X X
4c: Communicating with Families X X X
4d: Participating in a Professional Community X X X
4e: Growing and Developing Professionally X X X
4f: Showing Professionalism X X X

Teaching Performance Rating Based on Final Summative

Ineffective (0) Developing (1) Effective (2) Highly Effective (3)

1 or 2 Ineffective ratings Zero Ineffective ratings and fewer than 4 At least 7 Highly Effective ratings
3 or more Ineffective ratings or Developing ratings and
4 or more Developing ratings Zero Ineffective and Developing ratings

Teaching Performance Rating

2
 Secondary Example

Semester Exam Percent of Students Reaching Mastery Student Academic Progress Profile and Rating (Form 4)
Results for (Scoring 70% or Higher)
Individual Teacher
Teacher: Jane Doe School Year: 2012-13 EIN: 00001
st
1 Semester 84%
School: Canyon HS Grade/Subject/Dept: History Teacher
SS34
Evaluator: Mr. Smith Status: Probationary Continuing

2nd Semester 47%

SS35 Student Academic Progress Profile
Measurement Ineffective (0) Developing (1) Effective (2) Highly
Effective (3)

Using Appendix H-Student Academic Progress Cut

Scores, the evaluator and teacher identify the cut 1st Semester
Exam
scores for each semester exam and assign the SS34
appropriate rubric score.

2nd Semester
Exam
1st semester 84% of the students performed at SS35
mastery or above-Rubric Score 2

2nd Semester 47% of the students performed at

mastery or above-Rubric Score 1 Student Academic Progress Rating 1.5
(Total of Rubric Scores divided by Number of Rubric Scores)

2 + 1 = 3 = 1.5
2 2
 Secondary Example

Continuous School Improvement Profile and Rating (Form 5) Final Teacher Evaluation Rating (Form 9)

Teacher: Jane Doe School Year: 2012-13 EIN: 00001 Teacher: Jane Doe School Year: 2012-13 EIN: 00001

School: Canyon HS Grade/Subject/Dept: History Teacher School: Canyon HS Grade/Subject/Dept: History Teacher

Evaluator: Mr. Smith Status: Probationary Continuing Evaluator: Mr. Smith Status: Probationary Continuing

Teaching Performance (60%)

Elementary
2 X .60 1.2
Not Effective (0) Developing (1) Effective (2) Highly Effective (3)
Teaching Performance Rating
15 or fewer goals 16-22 goals achieved 23-28 goals 29-42 goals achieved Student Academic Progress (33%)
achieved achieved
1.5 X .33 .5
Student Academic Progress Rating

Continuous School Improvement (7%)

Junior High +
1 X .07 .07
Not Effective (0) Developing (1) Effective (2) Highly Effective (3) Continuous School Improvement Rating

6 or fewer goals 7-10 goals achieved 11-14 goals 15-21 goals achieved
Final Teacher Evaluation Numerical Score 1.77
achieved achieved
Final Teacher Evaluation Rating

Ineffective Developing Effective Highly Effective

High School
Greater than or Greater than or
Less than .8 equal to .8 equal to 1.7 Greater than or
Not Effective (0) Developing (1) Effective (2) Highly Effective (3) and and equal to 2.5
less than 1.7 less than 2.5
6 or fewer goals 7-10 goals achieved 11-13 goals 14-20 goals achieved
achieved achieved
Final Teacher Evaluation Rating Effective

Evaluator Signature Teacher Signature

Continuous School Improvement Rating

1 Date Date
 Group B Teacher Example

Teaching Performance Profile and Rating (Form 3)

Teacher Name: Jim Doe EIN: 00001 Fall Formative Spring Formative
Final Summative
Formal Observation #1 Formal Observation #2
School: Canyon Junior High School Year: 2012-13
Due no later than March 31
Date: 10/28/12 Date: 2/4/13
Grade/Subject/Dept: Choir Teacher

Evaluator: Mr. Smith Status: Probationary Continuing

Developing

Developing

Developing
Ineffective

Ineffective

Ineffective
Effective

Effective

Effective

Effective

Effective
effective
Highly

Highly

Highly
Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
1a: Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy X X X
1b: Demonstrating Knowledge of Students X X X
1c: Setting Instructional Outcomes X X X
1d: Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources X X X
1e: Designing Coherent Instruction X X X
1f: Designing Student Assessments X X X
Domain 2: The Classroom Environment
2a: Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport X X X
2b: Establishing a Culture for Learning X X X
2c: Managing Classroom Procedures X X X
2d: Managing Student Behavior X X X
2e: Organizing Physical Space X X X
Domain 3: Instruction
3a: Communicating with Students X X X
3b: Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques X X X
3c: Engaging Students in Learning X X X
3d: Using Assessment in Instruction X X X
3e: Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness X X X
Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities
4a: Reflecting on Teaching X X X
4b: Maintaining Accurate Records X X X
4c: Communicating with Families X X X
4d: Participating in a Professional Community X X X
4e: Growing and Developing Professionally X X X
4f: Showing Professionalism X X X

Teaching Performance Rating Based on Final Summative

Ineffective (0) Developing (1) Effective (2) Highly Effective (3)

1 or 2 Ineffective ratings Zero Ineffective ratings and fewer than 4 At least 7 Highly Effective ratings
3 or more Ineffective ratings or Developing ratings and
4 or more Developing ratings Zero Ineffective and Developing ratings

Teaching Performance Rating

1
 Group B Teacher Example

School-Wide AIMS Percent Growth Percentile Student Academic Progress Profile and Rating (Form 4)
Results Meets/Exceeds

Reading 57% 47% Teacher: Jim Doe School Year: 2012-13 EIN: 00001

School: Canyon Jr. High Grade/Subject/Dept: Choir Teacher

Writing 58% Status: Probationary Continuing
Evaluator: Mr. Smith

Student Academic Progress Profile

Using Appendix H-Student Academic Progress Cut Measurement Ineffective (0) Developing (1) Effective (2) Highly
Scores, the evaluator and teacher select the student Effective (3)
achievement scores that result in the highest rubric
score for each content area. AIMS
Reading

Reading 47% Growth-Rubric Score 2

AIMS
Writing 58% Meets/Exceeds-Rubric Score 1 Writing

2 + 1 = 3 = 1.5
2 2 Student Academic Progress Rating 1.5
(Total of Rubric Scores divided by Number of Rubric Scores)
 Group B Teacher Example

Continuous School Improvement Profile and Rating (Form 5) Final Teacher Evaluation Rating (Form 9)

Teacher: Jim Doe School Year: 2012-13 EIN: 00001 Teacher: Jim Doe School Year: 2012-13 EIN: 00001

School: Canyon Jr. High Grade/Subject/Dept: Choir Teacher School: Canyon Jr. High Grade/Subject/Dept: Choir Teacher

Evaluator: Mr. Smith Status: Probationary Continuing Evaluator: Mr. Smith Status: Probationary Continuing

Teaching Performance (60%)

Elementary
1 X .60 .6
Not Effective (0) Developing (1) Effective (2) Highly Effective (3)
Teaching Performance Rating
15 or fewer goals 16-22 goals achieved 23-28 goals 29-42 goals achieved Student Academic Progress (33%)
achieved achieved
1.5 X .33 .5
Student Academic Progress Rating

Continuous School Improvement (7%)

Junior High +
3 X .07 .21
Not Effective (0) Developing (1) Effective (2) Highly Effective (3) Continuous School Improvement Rating

6 or fewer goals 7-10 goals achieved 11-14 goals 15-21 goals achieved
Final Teacher Evaluation Numerical Score 1.31
achieved achieved
Final Teacher Evaluation Rating

Ineffective Developing Effective Highly Effective

High School
Greater than or Greater than or
Less than .8 equal to .8 equal to 1.7 Greater than or
Not Effective (0) Developing (1) Effective (2) Highly Effective (3) and and equal to 2.5
less than 1.7 less than 2.5
6 or fewer goals 7-10 goals achieved 11-13 goals 14-20 goals achieved
achieved achieved
Final Teacher Evaluation Rating Developing

Evaluator Signature Teacher Signature

Continuous School Improvement Rating

3 Date Date
 Group B Teacher Example

Appendix H-Student Academic Progress Cut Scores

Student Academic Progress Measures Cut Scores

AIMS (individual teacher and school-wide) Growth Percentiles
Reading 0-23.99% 0
Writing 24-40.99% 1
Math 41-69.99% 2
Science 70-100% 3
AIMS-A
Percent Meets/Exceeds
0-35.99% 0
36-59.99% 1
60-89.99% 2
90-100% 3

DIBELS Next Percent Mastery (Core)

0-35.99% 0
36-59.99% 1
60-89.99% 2
90-100% 3

District-Developed Assessments Percent Mastery (Scoring 70% or higher)

CRTs 0-35.99% 0
Student Profile Cards 36-59.99% 1
Writer’s Portfolio 60-89.99% 2
AIMS-Like Writing 90-100% 3

AP/IB/Cambridge Assessments Percent Earning a 3, 4 or 5

0-35.99% 0
36-59.99% 1
60-89.99% 2
90-100% 3

Percent of Students Taking Test

0-35.99% 0
36-59.99% 1
60-89.99% 2
90-100% 3

Other State Assessments Percent Mastery or Percent Moving to a Higher

CTE Category for AZELLA
AZELLA 0-35.99% 0
36-59.99% 1
60-89.99% 2
90-100% 3