Registration Guidelines 1
Registration Guidelines 1
P. O. Box 1994
Cell: +231 – 777140555/888140555
Email: [email protected] Website: www.lmhra.gov.lr
The writing of this guideline is an outcome of a five (5)-day retreat for senior staff of the Liberia
Medicines and Health Products Regulatory Authority (LMHRA). We herein acknowledge the
ingenuity, far-sightedness and leadership role of Pharm. Keturah C. Smith, Managing Director of
LMHRA, which led to the successful convening of the retreat.
We also acknowledge the organizational skills and guidance of the 2020 Retreat Committee led by Dr.
Thomas B.L. Kokulo who is the Deputy Director of the Inspectorate Department of LMHRA. We salute
the retreat participants for the useful comments during the deliberations of the retreat. Their
contributions during the deliberations and the resolution derived from the Retreat helped in the
crafting of this regulatory guidance document.
Much recognition is given to the Guideline Drafting Team which includes Pharm. Patricia Quaye-
Freeman, Director of Evaluation of Registration; Pharm. Mary G. Jalloh-Tozo, Deputy Director of
Evaluation of Registration; Pharm. Emmanuel Willie, Data & Research Manager; Pharm. Alexander
Momoh; Dr. Sumo Maiwo; and Pharm. Humphrey Taylor. Our heartfelt thanks also go to Dr. Flomoku
G. Miller, Technical Advisor to the Managing Director, for his encouragement, technical and moral
support to the Guideline Drafting Team.
We also acknowledge and give recognition to the World Health Organization (WHO) and the
International Committee on Harmonization (ICH) for making available documents which were used
as resource materials in the compilation of this guideline.
Most importantly and above all else, we sincerely give thanks and praises to the Almighty God for
endowing us with the insight, resourcefulness and strength to draft this guideline. The guideline, along
with other quality documents, shall constitute the legal basis for the evaluation and registration of
medicines and health products in Liberia.
The LMHRA Evaluation and Registration Department shall welcome comments/suggestions for
improvement of this guideline during its implementation.
ECOWAS recognizing that all the fifteen member states have different requirements for submission of
their dossiers for the granting of marketing authorization, initiated activities to harmonize medical
products registration in the region. This initiative resulted in the development of registration
requirements based on CTD format that were validated, and adopted by ECOWAS member states. A
Common Technical Document (CTD) is an internationally agreed upon format for the organization
and preparation of application dossiers for marketing authorization developed through the International
Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human use (ICH)
process, it is used by an increasing number of regulatory authorities, including the European Union,
the US Food and Drug Administration, Japan, and Canada among others. The WHO has adopted the
CTD as the format for applications submitted to its Prequalified Programme. The CTD is organized
into five modules (see the CTD triangle below). Module 1 is region specific and modules 2, 3, 4 and
5 are intended to be common for all regions. Applicants should not modify the overall organization of
the CTD.
The regulation of medicines and related health products in Liberia is governed by the provisions and
requirements of the Liberia Medicines and Health Products Regulatory Authority (LMHRA) Act,
2010.
The law requires that all medicines manufactured, imported or exported, distributed, or sold in Liberia
should be of acceptable quality, safe and efficacious. The process of medicines registration forms an
important basis for evaluating and assuring that medicines and health products are of good quality and
safe. Mindful of the need to increase access to quality medicines and to promote and protect public
health by developing regulatory systems that satisfy minimum regulatory capacity, the Liberia
Medicines and Health Products Regulatory Authority has adopted the Common Technical Document
format for submission of documentation for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use in Liberia.
Objective
These guidelines are intended to provide guidance to applicants to prepare product dossiers in CTD
format for submission to LMHRA.
LEGAL BASIS
In pursuance of Part 1 Section 1 of the Act to Establish the Liberia Medicines and Health Products
Regulatory Authority (LMHRA) of 2010, these guidelines, which require use of the Common
Technical Document (CTD) format shall be followed by all applicants when preparing applications
for Marketing Authorization of Pharmaceutical Products for Human use intended for submission to
LMHRA. This guideline is hereby made to provide guidance to applicants on the procedure for
registering medicines and health products in Liberia. Applicants are required to familiarize themselves
with this document and the above law before completing the registration application form (Appendix
1)
Scope
These guidelines apply to all pharmaceutical products of synthetic or semi-synthetic origin other than
biological products, traditional medicinal products, diagnostic aids and medical appliances.
The definitions provided below apply to the words and phrases used in these guidelines to facilitate
interpretation of the guidelines:
Allopathic
A product or substance other than a medical device, which is to be administered to one or more human
beings on its own, or as an ingredient in the preparation of a substance, for a medicinal purpose.
A raw material, intermediate, or an API that is used in the production of an API and that is incorporated
as a significant structural fragment into the structure of the API. An API starting material can be an
article of commerce, a material purchased from one or more suppliers under contract or commercial
agreement, or produced through in-house synthesis.
Applicant
The person or entity who submits an application for product registration to the Authority is responsible
for all the product information.
Any pharmaceutical company or Pharmacist established within a country or jurisdiction who has
received a mandate from the manufacturer to act on his behalf for specified tasks with regard to the
manufacturer’s obligations under legislation of the medicine and other regulatory guidance’s issued
by the Authority.
Batch records
All documents associated with the manufacture of a batch of bulk product or finished product. They
provide a history of each batch of product and of all circumstances pertinent to the quality of the final
product.
A defined quantity of starting material, packaging material, or product processed in a single process
or series of processes so that it could be expected to be homogeneous. In the case of continuous
manufacture, the batch must correspond to a defined fraction of the production, characterized by its
intended homogeneity. It may sometimes be necessary to divide a batch into a number of sub-batches,
which are later brought together to form a final homogeneous batch.
A distinctive combination of numbers and/or letters which specifically identifies a batch on the labels,
the batch records, the certificates of analysis, etc.
Bio-equivalence
Bioavailability
The rate and relative amount of the administered drug which reaches the general circulation intact, or
the rate and extent to which the API is absorbed from a drug product and becomes available at the
site(s) of action.
Biological Products
An API for which the highest dose included in the List of Essential Medicines (if the API appear in
the List of Essential Medicines) or, the highest dose strength available on the market as an oral solid
dosage form is soluble in 250 ml or less of aqueous media over the pH range of 1.2–6.8 at 37ºC.
Bulk Product
Any product that has completed all processing and steps up to, but not including final packaging.
Clinical trial
Any systematic study on pharmaceutical products in human subjects whether in patients or non-patient
volunteers in order to discover or verify the effects of, and/or identifies any adverse reaction to
investigational products, and/or to study absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of the
products with the object of ascertaining their efficacy and safety.
Production batches of an API or finished pharmaceutical product (FPP) for which the stability studies
are initiated or completed post-approval through a commitment provided with the application.
Comparator product
A pharmaceutical product with which the generic product is intended to be interchangeable in clinical
practice. The comparator product will normally be the innovator product for which efficacy, safety,
and quality have been established.
Container
That which holds the article and is or may be in direct contact with the drug.
Critical process
A process that may cause variation in the quality of the pharmaceutical product.
Cross-contamination
Contamination of a starting material, intermediate product, or finished product with another starting
material or product during production.
Counterfeit Medicine
Means a medicine that is deliberately and fraudulently mislabeled with respect to identity for source.
Counterfeit products may be branded or generic medicines, and may include products with the correct
ingredients, with the wrong ingredient, without ingredients, with insufficient active ingredient, or with
fake packaging material.
Dosage Form
A drug master file (DMF) is a master file that provides a full set of data on an API. In some countries,
the term may also comprise data on an excipient or a component of a product such as a container.
Drug Substance
A multisource product that has been marketed by the applicant or manufacturer associated with the
dossier for at least five years and for which at least 10 production batches were produced over the
previous year, or, if less than 10 batches were produced in the previous year, not less than 25 batches
were produced in the previous three years.
Excipient
Any component of a finished dosage form other than the claimed therapeutic ingredient or active
ingredients.
A finished dosage form that has undergone all stages of manufacture, including packaging in its final
container and labelling. Related terms – Intermediate Product, Bulk Product.
Generic Products
The term generic product means a pharmaceutical product, usually intended to be interchangeable with
the innovator product, which is usually manufactured without a licence from the innovator company
and marketed after expiry of the patent or other exclusivity rights.
Intermediate product
Partly processed product that must undergo further manufacturing steps before it becomes a bulk
product.
Immediate Container
That part of a product container which is in direct contact with the drug at all times.
Generally, the pharmaceutical product that was first authorized for marketing (normally as a patented
product) on the basis of documentation of efficacy, safety, and quality.
Labeling
Includes any legend, word, or mark attached to, included in, belonging to, or accompanying any drug
including: 1) the immediate container label; 2) cartons, wrappers, and similar items; 3) information
materials, such as instructional brochures and package inserts.
Manufacturer
A company that carries out operations such as production, packaging, repackaging, labeling, and
relabeling of products.
All operations of purchase of materials and products, production, packaging, quality control, release,
storage, shipment of finished products, and the related controls.
Manufacturing process
The transformation of starting materials into finished products (drug substances or pharmaceutical
dosage forms) through a single operation or a sequence of operations involving installations, personnel,
documentation and environment.
Marketing authorization
An official document issued for the purpose of marketing or free distribution of a product after
evaluation of safety, efficacy, and quality of the product.
A document or a set of documents specifying the starting materials, with their quantities and packaging
materials, together with a description of the procedures and precautions required to produce a specified
quantity of a finished product as well as the processing instructions, including in-process controls.
Those pharmacopoeias recognized by the Authority, i.e., The International Pharmacopoeia (Ph.Int.),
European Pharmacopoeia (Ph.Eur.), British Pharmacopoeia (BP), Japanese Pharmacopoeia (JP), and
the United States Pharmacopeia (USP).
The study carried out by the manufacturer on production batches according to a predetermined
schedule in order to monitor, confirm, and extend the projected re-test period (or shelf-life) of the API,
or to confirm or extend the shelf-life of the FPP.
Pharmaceutical equivalents
Products are pharmaceutically equivalent if they contain the same amount of the same active
ingredient(s) in the same dosage form, if they meet the same or comparable standards, and if they are
intended to be administered by the same route.
A batch of an API or FPP manufactured by a procedure fully representative of and simulating that to
be applied to a full production-scale batch; for example, for solid oral dosage forms, a pilot scale is
generally, at a minimum, one-tenth that of a full production scale or 100,000 tablets or capsules,
whichever is the larger; unless otherwise adequately justified.
Primary batch
A batch of an API or FPP used in a stability study from which stability data are submitted in a
registration application for the purpose of establishing a re-test period or shelf-life.
Production batch
Production
All operations involved in the preparation of a pharmaceutical product, from receipt of materials,
through processing and packaging, to completion of the finished product.
Packaging material
Any material, including printed material, employed in the packaging of a pharmaceutical product,
excluding any outer packaging used for transportation or shipment. Packaging materials are referred
to as primary or secondary according to whether or not they are intended to be in direct contact with
the product.
Packaging
All operations, including filling and labeling, that a bulk product has to undergo in order to become
a finished product. Sterile filling would not normally be regarded as part of packaging, the bulk product
being the filled, but not the finally packaged, primary container.
An authorized written procedure giving instructions for performing operations not necessarily specific
to a given product or material but of a more general nature (e.g., equipment operation, maintenance
and cleaning; validation; cleaning of premises and environmental control; sampling and inspection).
Certain SOPs may be used to supplement product-specific master and batch production documentation.
Specification
A document describing in detail the requirements with which the products or materials used or obtained
during manufacture have to conform. Specifications serve as a basis for quality evaluation.
The ability of an active ingredient or a drug product to retain its properties within specified limits
throughout its shelf-life. The chemical, physical, microbiological, and biopharmaceutical aspects of
stability must be considered.
A document describing the activities to be performed in a validation, including the acceptance criteria
for the approval of a manufacturing process or a part thereof for routine use.
Validation
The demonstration, with documentary evidence, that any procedure, process, equipment, material,
activity, or system actually leads to the expected results.
Validation report
A document in which the records, results and evaluation of a completed validation program are
assembled. It may also contain proposals for the improvement of processes and/or equipment.
Variation
A change to any aspect of a pharmaceutical product including, but not limited to, a change to
formulation, method, and site of manufacture or specifications for the finished product, ingredients,
container and container labeling, product package (design, color, etc.) and product information.
ICH
The International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for
Human use.
English
Electronic submission of dossiers on a Flash disk in PDF
Summaries in word format
Confirm that the electronic submission has been checked with up-to-date and state-of-the-art
antivirus software along with duly sign commitment that the submission is free from any form of
virus
3 Tablets/Capsules/Suppositories/Lozenges X
8 The same container size of different strengths and formulations. Ampoules and Vials X
and Large Volume Parenteral
12 The same container size of different strengths and formulations. Ampoules and Vials X
and Large Volume Parenteral
13 Ampoules or single dose vials containing identical solutions of the same strength but X
of different volumes (i.e. resulting in different total doses).
15 Ampoules and single dose vials containing e.g. dry powder, crystals of different mass
X
17 Special ampoules of dry powder and “water for injections” contained in the same X
unit, but intended for mixing at the time of injection if water for injections is fully
described in dossier
20 Multidose vials and a single dose ampoule or vial of the same formulation if the X
single-dose ampoule or vial corresponds to the dose indicated for the Multidose vial.
21 Multidose vials containing dry powder of different mass of the same formulation, X
and the same concentration when reconstituted.
22 An ampoule of diluents packed together with any preparation including biological X
medicines if diluent is fully described in dossier.
23 Infusion solutions of the different volumes and of the same formulation which are
packed in containers of exactly the same type of material depending on the relevant X
information submitted.
24 Infusion solutions of the same formulation and of the same or different volume which X
are packed in containers made of different types of materials.
25 A preparation, packed in plastic containers, intended to be marketed in glass X
containers containing the same volume and the same formulation.
26 Products with the same strength and formulation but with different colors and/or X
flavors.
27 Applications containing the same API(s) applying for additional indications which
render the product in a different scheduling status, or different pharmacological X
classification, or have any other restrictions imposed other than the original
application.
28 Removal of antimicrobial preservative from single dose presentation of registered X
vaccine that included a preservative in the original approved formulation
29 Same formulation with different proprietary names whether of the same or different X
applicants
Application for the registration of Pharmaceuticals Products shall be made only by:
The manufacturer
A distributor authorized by the manufacturer, license/patent holder
An authorized Local Agent or Technical Representative (Registered Pharmacist) of the
manufacturer
The name, physical address, telephone number, fax number, and e-mail address of the applicant shall
be provided.
All application shall be accompanied by non-refundable registration fee as specified in fee schedule
Rejection at reception: All applications submitted to the Authority shall be subjected to the
provisions of these guidelines otherwise the application shall be rejected and applicant notified
immediately however the applicant shall have fifteen (15) working days to re-submit the application
in line with all submission requirements as specified in the guidelines. Nonconformity to the above
shall be given additional fifteen (15) working days, failure to comply, the application will be cancelled
and applicant will be required to re-apply and pay all necessary fees.
Rejection after screening and assessors review: Applicant will be notified on the status of their
application depending on the submission type either Fast Track or Regular. Assessors Queries will be
formulated in to questionnaires communicated to manufacturer of the medicinal product. The applicant
is given ninety (90) days to respond to all the queries. Failure to adequately provide answers to the
queries the Product will be rejected.
The CTD is organized into five modules; Module 1 is specific to the regulatory Authority of Liberia
which includes Administrative and Product information. Modules 2, 3, 4, and 5 are intended to be
common for all situations.
The following Modular format of PDs in the CTD content should always be considered during dossier
preparation for registration submission to the Authority:
2.4 Nonclinical Overview – generally not applicable for multisource products (some exceptions may apply)
2.5 Clinical Overview
2.6 Nonclinical Written and Tabulated Summaries – generally not applicable for multisource products (some
exceptions may apply)
2.7 Clinical Summary – generally not applicable for multisource products
Module 3 – Quality
3.1 Table of Contents of Module 3
3.2.S Body of Data - Drug Substance
3.2.P Body of Data – Finished Drug Product (name, dosage form)
Module 4 – Nonclinical Study Reports – generally not applicable for multisource products (some exceptions
may apply)
ANNEX B: FORMS
Dated and signed letter for submission of the dossier by mentioning the product included in the dossier
from the manufacturer and/or local agent responsible for registration.
Table of contents of Module 1 through Module 5 (of the PD) should be provided in Module 1.
Completed and signed application form as provided in these Guidelines should be submitted. The date
of application should correspond to the date of submission of the registration dossier to the Authority.
A Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) Certificate and Certificate of Pharmaceutical Product (CPP)
issued by a competent authority in the exporting country should be provided in Module 1.
A complete copy of the Certificate of Suitability (CEP), including any annexes, should be provided in
Module 1. The declaration of access for the CEP should be duly filled out by the CEP holder on behalf
of the FPP manufacturer or applicant to the Authority.
In addition, a written commitment should be included that states the applicant will inform the Authority
in the event that the CEP is withdrawn. It should also be acknowledged by the applicant that withdrawal
of the CEP will require additional consideration of the API data requirements to support the PD. The
written commitment should accompany the copy of the CEP in Module 1.
Along with the CEP, the applicant should supply the following information in the dossier, with data
summarized in the DOS-PD and Module 3 of the dossier:
3.2. S.1.3 General properties ‒ discussion of any additional applicable physicochemical and other
relevant API properties that are not controlled by the CEP and Ph.Eur. Monograph, e.g. solubility
and polymorphs.
3.2. S.3.1 Elucidation of structure and other characteristics‒ studies to identify polymorphs
(exception: where the CEP specifies a polymorphic form) and particle size distribution, where
applicable.
3.2.S.4.1 Specification ‒ the specifications of the FPP manufacturer, including all tests and limits
of the CEP and Ph. Eur. monograph, and any additional tests and acceptance criteria that are not
controlled in the CEP and Ph. Eur. monograph, such as polymorphs and/or particle size
distribution.
3.2.S.4.2 / 3.2.S.4.3 Analytical procedures and validation ‒ for any tests in addition to those in the
CEP and Ph. Eur. monograph.
3.2.S.4.4 Batch analysis‒ results from three batches of at least one pilot scale, demonstrating
compliance with the FPP manufacturer’s API specifications.
Product information
Product information including package insert, labeling, and Summary of Product Characteristics
(SmPC) should be provided in Module 1 of the dossier. All product information label statements are
required to be in English. Any information appearing in the product information (labels, PIL, and
SmPC) should be based on scientific justification.
Only original labels or computer-ready color-printed or indelible ink labels are accepted for final
approval. In the case where the text of the labels is printed directly on plastic bottles through a silk
screen process, photocopies of these labels will be accepted for approval.
The titles for batch number, manufacturing, and expiry dates should be part of the printing (typewritten
materials, stickers, etc., are not acceptable). If the labeling technology of the manufacturer is such that
this information is to be printed on the label during production, a written commitment to show all the
required information on the label of the finished product must be submitted. The contents of the label
should at least contain:
g) Batch/Lot number;
h) Manufacturing date;
Registration status within ECOWAS countries and with Stringent Drug Regulatory Authorities
If an evidence indicating that the active pharmaceutical ingredient and/or finished pharmaceutical
products are prequalified by WHO is available, it should be presented in Module 1.
Submit a valid Certificate of Pharmaceutical Product in format recommended by the World Health
Organization together with a valid Manufacturing Authorization for pharmaceutical production.
VARIATION PRINCIPLES
Variations are changes that may have minor or major effects on the overall safety, efficacy and quality
of the product. Applicants must satisfy themselves that they meet all of the prescribed conditions for
the change and submit all required documentation with the variation application. Such variations can
be implemented if no objection letter has been issued within a time period. Should questions arise
during the specified period; the change can only be implemented on receipt of a letter of approval from
LMHRA.
Please note: patent rights are highly considered like package color, size, applicable pictorials (not more
than two), package presentation (size, color, labeling, etc.), administration variation, composition,
shelf life or storage and name.
Website: _______________________________
Website: _______________________________
Website: _______________________________
Country of Origin
3 PRODUCT
Controlled Drug
4 PHARMACOLOGICAL
CLASSIFICATION
5 INDICATIONS
Chemical Name:
Empirical Formula:
Molecular Weight:
Structural Formula:
- Batch processing
- In – Process Checks
- Packaging Operation
- Intravenous
- Intramuscular
- Topical
- Inhalation
Drug Interactions
Contra-indications
15 TREATMENT/ANTIDOTE IN
THE EVENT OF OVERDOSE
Development Toxicity
17 ANALYTIC METHODS
Specification & Test Methods of
Active Ingredients
18 DECLARATION
I the undersigned certify that the information in the accompanying documentation concerning
the application for registration of the Medicine or health product indicated hereinis correct and
true, and reflects the total information available.
I further certify that I have examined the statements made in this form and I attest to their
accuracy. I further confirm that the information referred to in my application file is available
for verification. I also agree that I am obliged to comply with the requirements of the Authority
related to the stated product at any time in the future.
Name: ______________________________________________________________
Signature: ___________________________________________________________
Date: _______________________________________________________________
STAMP/SEAL
Dosage form
Route of administration
Storage condition
Visual description
Therapeutic category
Business address
Telephone number
Fax number
Telephone/Fax number
Telephone/Fax number
Module 2
Module 3
Module 4
Module 5
I, the undersigned, certify that all the information in the accompanying documentation
concerning an application for a marketing authorization for:
Dosage form
Applicant
Manufacturer
I further certify that I have examined the following statements and I attest to their accuracy.
1. The current edition of the WHO Guideline, ―Good manufacturing practices for pharmaceutical
products, is applied in full in all premises involved in the manufacture of this product.
2. The formulation per dosage form correlates with the master formula and with the batch
manufacturing record forms.
3. The manufacturing procedure is exactly as specified in the master formula and batch manufacturing
record forms.
4. Each batch of all starting materials is either tested or certified against the full specifications in the
accompanying documentation and comply fully with those specifications before it is released for
manufacturing purposes.
5. All batches of active pharmaceutical ingredient(s) are obtained from the source(s) specified in the
accompanying documentation.
6. No batch of active pharmaceutical ingredient will be used unless a copy of the batch certificate
established by the active ingredient manufacturer is available.
7. Each batch of the container/closure system is tested or certified against the full specifications in the
accompanying documentation and complies fully with those specifications before it is released for
manufacturing purposes.
8. Each batch of the finished product is either tested or certified against the full specifications in the
accompanying documentation and complies fully with the release specifications before it is released
for sale.
9. The person releasing the product for sale is an authorized person as defined by the WHO guideline
―Good manufacturing practices: Authorized person - the role, functions and training.
10. The procedures for control of the finished product have been validated for this formulation.
11. The market authorization holder has a standard operating procedure for handling adverse reaction
reports on its products.
12. The market authorization holder has a standard operating procedure for handling batch recalls of
its products.
Signature _____________________________________________________________________
Name _____________________________________________________________________
Position in company (print or type) ________________________________________________
Date: _________________________________________________________________________
INTRODUCTION
Summary of product information:
Non-proprietary name(s) of the finished pharmaceutical product(s)
(FPP)
Dosage form
Reference Number(s)
Strength(s)
Route of administration
Proposed indication(s)
Title:
Name:
Contact person responsible for this application Phone:
Fax:
Email:
Complete the following table for the option that applies for the submission of API information:
Name of API:
Name of API manufacturer:
Confirmation of API Prequalification document:
is a written commitment provided that the applicant will inform WHO in the event
that the CEP is withdrawn and acknowledged that withdrawal of the CEP will
require additional consideration of the API data requirements to support the dossier:
□ yes, □ no;
□
a copy of the most current CEP (with annexes) and written commitment should be
provided in Module 1;
the declaration of access should be filled out by the CEP holder on behalf of the
FPP manufacturer or applicant to PQTm who refers to the CEP; and
summaries of the relevant information should be provided under the appropriate
sections (e.g. S.1.3, S.3.1, S.4.1 through S.4.4, S.5, S.6 and S.7; see Quality
guideline).
In common solvents:
Quantitative aqueous pH solubility profile (pH 1.2 to 6.8) at 37°C:
Polymorphic form:
Solvate:
Hydrate:
(d) Other:
pH
pK
Partition coefficients
Melting/boiling points
Hygroscopicity
Other
(a) Name, address and responsibility (e.g. fabrication, packaging, labelling, testing,
storage) of each manufacturer, including contractors and each proposed production site
or facility involved in these activities:
API-PQ
Name and address
Responsibility number/APIMF/CEP
(including block(s)/unit(s))
number (if applicable)
(b) Manufacturing authorization for the production of API(s) and, where available,
certificate of GMP compliance (GMP information should be provided in Module 1):
(e) Where the API(s) and the starting materials and reagents used to manufacture the API(s)
are without risk of transmitting agents of animal spongiform encephalopathies, a letter
of attestation confirming this can be found in:
(a) Summary of the controls performed at critical steps of the manufacturing process and
on intermediates:
(a) Description of process validation and/or evaluation studies (e.g. for aseptic processing
and sterilization):
(a) Description and discussion of the significant changes made to the manufacturing
process and/or manufacturing site of the API used in producing comparative
bioavailability or bio-waiver, stability, scale-up, pilot and, if available, production scale
batches:
(a) List of studies performed (e.g. IR, UV, NMR, MS, elemental analysis) and conclusion
from the studies (e.g. whether results support the proposed structure):
(d) Summary of studies performed to identify the particle size distribution of the API:
<including identification of and data on the API lot used in bioavailability studies>
(a) Identification of potential and actual impurities arising from the synthesis, manufacture
and/or degradation:
i. List of API-related impurities (e.g. starting materials, by-products, intermediates,
chiral impurities, degradation products), including chemical name, structure and
origin:
API-related impurity
Identification Threshold
Qualification Threshold
ii. Data on observed impurities for relevant batches (e.g. comparative bioavailability or
biowaiver, stability batches):
Impurity Acceptance Results (include batch number* and use**)
* include strength, if reporting impurity levels found in the FPP (e.g. for comparative studies)
** e.g. comparative bioavailability or biowaiver studies, stability
Analytical procedure
Test Acceptance criteria
(Type/Source/Version)
Description
Identification
Impurities
Assay
etc.
(a) Summary of the analytical procedures (e.g. key method parameters, conditions, system
suitability testing):
(a) Summary of the validation information (e.g. validation parameters and results):
See 2.3.R Regional Information for summaries of the validation information (i.e.
2.3.R.2 Analytical Procedures and Validation Information).
Description
Identification
Impurities
Assay
etc.
(c) Summary of analytical procedures and validation information for those procedures not
previously summarized in 2.3.S.4.2 and 2.3.S.4.3 (e.g. historical analytical procedures):
(a) Justification of the API specification (e.g. evolution of tests, analytical procedures and
acceptance criteria, differences from officially recognized compendia standard(s)):
(a) Source (including lot number) of primary reference standards or reference materials
(e.g. Ph.Int., Ph.Eur., BP, USP, in-house):
(b) Characterization and evaluation of non-official (e.g. not from an officially recognized
pharmacopoeia) primary reference standards or reference materials (e.g. elucidation of
structure, certificate of analysis):
(c) Description of the process controls of the secondary reference standard (comparative
certificate of analysis and IR spectra against primary standard):
(a) Description of the container closure system(s) for the shipment and storage of the API
(including the identity of materials of construction of each primary packaging
component and a brief summary of the specifications):
(b) Other information on the container closure system(s) (e.g. suitability studies):
(a) Summary of stress testing (e.g. heat, humidity, oxidation, photolysis, acid/base): and
results:
(b) Summary of accelerated and long-term testing parameters (e.g. studies conducted):
Description
Moisture
Impurities
Assay
etc.
(c) Proposed storage statement and re-test period (or shelf-life, as appropriate):
* indicate if a shelf-life is proposed in lieu of a re-test period (e.g. in the case of labile APIs)
(a) Stability protocol for Primary stability batches (e.g. storage conditions (including
tolerances), batch numbers and batch sizes, tests and acceptance criteria, testing
frequency, container closure system(s)):
Parameter Details
Storage condition(s) (◦C, % RH)
Batch number(s) / batch size(s) <primary batches>
Tests and acceptance criteria Description
Moisture
Impurities
Assay
etc.
Testing frequency
Container closure system(s)
Parameter Details
Storage condition(s) (◦C, % RH)
Batch number(s) / batch size(s) <not less than three production batches>
Tests and acceptance criteria Description
Moisture
Impurities
Assay
etc.
Testing frequency
Container closure system(s)
(c) Stability protocol for Ongoing batches (e.g. storage conditions (including tolerances),
batch sizes and annual allocation, tests and acceptance criteria, testing frequency,
container closure system(s)):
Parameter Details
Storage condition(s) (◦C, % RH)
Annual allocation <at least one production batch per year (unless none is
produced that year) in each container closure system >
Tests and acceptance criteria Description
Moisture
Impurities
Assay
etc.
Testing frequency
Container closure system(s)
Subtotal 1
<complete with appropriate title e.g. Film-coating >
Subtotal 2
Total
ii. key physicochemical characteristics (e.g. water content, solubility, particle size
distribution, polymorphic or solid state form) of the API(s) that can influence the
performance of the FPP:
(a) Discussion of the choice of excipients listed in 2.3.P.1 (e.g. their concentrations, their
characteristics that can influence the FPP performance):
(a) Summary describing the development of the FPP (e.g. route of administration, usage,
optimization of the formulation, etc.):
(b) Information on primary (submission, registration, exhibit) batches including
comparative bioavailability or bio-waiver, stability, commercial:
‹packaging configuration I›
‹ packaging configuration I›
‹ packaging configuration I›
<complete with appropriate title e.g. Core tablet, Contents of capsule, Powder for injection>
Subtotal 1
Subtotal 2
Total
(c) Description of batches used in the comparative in vitro studies (e.g. dissolution) and in
the in vivo studies (e.g. comparative bioavailability or bio-waiver), including strength,
batch number, type of study and reference to the data (volume, page):
(d) Summary of results for comparative in vitro studies (e.g. dissolution):
(e) Summary of any information on in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) studies (with
cross-reference to the studies in Module 5):
2.3.P.2.2.2 Overages
(a) Discussion of the parameters relevant to the performance of the FPP (e.g. pH, ionic
strength, dissolution, particle size distribution, polymorphism, rheological properties):
(a) Discussion of the development of the manufacturing process of the FPP (e.g.
optimization of the process, selection of the method of sterilization):
(b) Discussion of the differences in the manufacturing process(es) for the batches used in
the comparative bioavailability or bio-waiver studies and the process described in
2.3.P.3.3:
(a) Discussion of the suitability of the container closure system (described in 2.3.P.7) used
for the storage, transportation (shipping) and use of the FPP (e.g. choice of materials,
protection from moisture and light, compatibility of the materials with the FPP):
(b) For a device accompanying a multi-dose container, a summary of the study results
demonstrating the reproducibility of the device (e.g. consistent delivery of the intended
volume for the lowest intended dose):
2.3.P.2.6 Compatibility
(a) Discussion of the compatibility of the FPP (e.g. with reconstitution diluent(s) or dosage
devices, co-administered FPPs):
2.3.P.3.1 Manufacturer(s)
(a) Name, address and responsibility (e.g. fabrication, packaging, labelling, testing) of each
manufacturer, including contractors and each proposed production site or facility
involved in manufacturing and testing:
(a) List of all components of the FPP to be used in the manufacturing process and their amounts
on a per batch basis (including individual components of mixtures prepared in-house (e.g.
coatings) and overages, if any):
Subtotal 1
<complete with appropriate title e.g. Film-coating >
Subtotal 2
Total
2.3.P.3.3 Description of Manufacturing Process and Process Controls
(a) Summary of controls performed at the critical steps of the manufacturing process and
on isolated intermediates:
(a) Summary of the process validation and/or evaluation studies conducted (including
product quality review(s) where relevant) and/or a summary of the proposed process
validation protocol for the critical steps or critical assays used in the manufacturing
process (e.g. protocol number, parameters, results):
Document code(s) for the process validation protocol(s) and/or report(s) (including
reference number/version/date):
2.3.P.4.1 Specifications
(a) Summary of the validation information for the analytical procedures for supplementary
tests (where applicable):
(a) Justification of the specifications (e.g. evolution of tests, analytical procedures and
acceptance criteria, exclusion of certain tests, differences from officially recognized
compendia standard(s)):
(a) For FPPs using excipients without risk of transmitting agents of animal spongiform
encephalopathies, a letter of attestation confirming this can be found in:
Novel excipients are not accepted in scientific discussion (PQTm). See quality guideline for
definition.
2.3.P.5.1 Specification(s)
(a) Summary of the analytical procedures (e.g. key method parameters, conditions, system
suitability testing):
(a) Summary of the validation information (e.g. validation parameters and results):
Acceptance Results
Test
criteria <batch x> <batch y> etc.
Description
Identification
Impurities
Assay
etc.
(c) Summary of analytical procedures and validation information for those procedures not
previously summarized in 2.3.P.5.2 and 2.3.P.5.3 (e.g. historical analytical procedures):
Degradation product
(code name, chemical
name and compendia Structure Origin
name (e.g. USP RC A) if
relevant)
i. Maximum daily dose (i.e. the amount of API administered per day) for the API,
corresponding ICH Reporting/Identification/Qualification Thresholds for the
degradation products in the FPP and the concentration limits (ppm) for the process-
related impurities (e.g. residual solvents):
ii. Data on observed impurities for relevant batches (e.g. comparative bioavailability or
bio-waiver):
(a) Justification of the FPP specification(s) (e.g. evolution of tests, analytical procedures
and acceptance criteria, differences from officially recognized compendia standard(s)):
(a) Source (including lot number) of primary reference standards or reference materials
(e.g. Ph.Int., Ph.Eur., BP, USP, in-house) not discussed in 3.2.S.5:
(b) Characterization and evaluation of non-official (e.g. not from an officially recognized
pharmacopoeia) primary reference standards or reference materials (e.g. elucidation of
structure, certificate of analysis) not discussed in 3.2.S.5:
(c) Description of the process controls of the secondary reference standard (comparative
certificate of analysis and IR spectra against primary standard) not discussed in 3.2.S.5:
(a) Description of the container closure systems, including unit count or fill size, container
size or volume:
(b) Summary of specifications of each primary and functional secondary (e.g. foil pouches)
packaging components:
Specifications
Packaging component
(list parameters e.g. identification (IR))
HDPE bottle
PP cap
Induction sealed liners
Blister films (PVC, etc.)
Aluminum foil backing
etc.
2.3.P.8 Stability
(a) Summary of stress testing and results (e.g. photostability studies, cyclic studies, freeze-
thaw studies, demonstration of stability-indication of purity/assay method(s)):
(b) Summary of accelerated and long-term testing parameters (e.g. studies conducted):
Summary of the stability results observed for the above accelerated and long-term
studies:
Test Results
Description
Moisture
Impurities
Assay
etc.
(c) Proposed storage statement and shelf-life (and in-use storage conditions and in-use
period, if applicable):
(a) Stability protocol for Primary stability batches (e.g. storage conditions (including
tolerances), batch numbers and batch sizes, tests and acceptance criteria, testing
frequency, container closure system(s)):
Testing frequency
Container closure system(s)
(b) Stability protocol for Commitment batches (e.g. storage conditions (including
tolerances), batch numbers (if known) and batch sizes, tests and acceptance criteria,
testing frequency, container closure system(s)):
Parameter Details
Storage condition(s) (◦C, % RH)
Batch number(s) / batch size(s) <not less than three production batches in each container
closure system>
Tests and acceptance criteria Description
Moisture
Impurities
Assay
etc.
Testing Frequency
Container Closure System(s)
(c) Stability protocol for Ongoing batches (e.g. storage conditions (including tolerances),
number of batches per strength and batch sizes, tests and acceptance criteria, testing
frequency, container closure system(s)):
Parameter Details
Storage condition(s) (◦C, % RH)
Batch size(s), annual allocation <at least one production batch per year (unless none is
produced that year) in each container closure system >
Tests and acceptance criteria Description
Moisture
Impurities
Assay
etc.
Testing frequency
Container closure system(s)
(b) Summary of analytical procedures and validation information for those procedures not
previously summarized in 2.3.P.5 (e.g. analytical procedures used only for stability
studies):
(c) Bracketing and matrixing design and justification for Commitment and/or Ongoing
stability batches, if applicable:
2.3.A APPENDICES
(a) Summary of the information assessing the risk with respect to potential contamination
with adventitious agents: If applicable.
2.3.A.3 Excipients
(a) Summary of the details of manufacture, characterization and controls, with cross
references to supporting safety data (nonclinical and/or clinical) for the novel
excipients: Not applicable. Novel excipients are not accepted in PQTm. See quality
guideline for definition.
(a) List of batches (including strengths) for which executed production documents have
been provided (e.g. comparative bioavailability or bio-waiver batches):
(a) The blank master production documents for each strength, proposed commercial batch
size and manufacturing facility should be provided in Module 3.
ATTACHMENT NUMBER:
Other variables/effects:
Typical chromatograms or spectra may be found
in:
Company(s) responsible for method validation:
Other information (specify):
Title:
Primary contact person responsible for
First name:
this application1
Family Name:
Contact person's job title
Contact person's postal address
Unit
Building/PO Box number
Road/Street
Plant/Zone
Village/suburb
Town/City
District and Mandal
Province/State
Postal code
Country
Contact person's email address
Contact person's phone number
1 Please note that the contact listed in this form will be the primary contact for email and mail communication for this specific application.
Related dossiers (e.g. FPP(s) with the same API(s) submitted to the Prequalification Team:
medicines (PQTm) by the applicant):
Reference
API, strength, dosage form API manufacturer
number Prequalified
(eg. Abacavir (as sulphate) (including address if same
(e.g. (Y/N)
300 mg tablets) supplier as current dossier)
HA998)
Indicate which option applies for the submission of API information: <check one only>
Name of API:
Name of API
manufacturer:
□ Confirmation of API prequalification document
□ Certificate of suitability to the European Pharmacopoeia (CEP)
Active pharmaceutical ingredient master file (APIMF) procedure:
APIMF number assigned by WHO (if known): _______ ; version number(s) including
□
amendments (and/or date(s)) of the open part: _______ ; version number(s) including
amendments (and/or date(s)) of the restricted part: : _______.
Full details in the PD
□
Document version number/identifier of current module 3.2.S: _______________
2.3.S.2 Manufacture (name, manufacturer)
(a) Name, address and responsibility (e.g. fabrication, packaging, labelling, testing,
storage) of each manufacturer, including contractors and each proposed production site or
facility involved in these activities:
(a) Description of the container closure system(s) for the storage and shipment of the API:
(c) Proposed storage conditions and re-test period (or shelf-life, as appropriate):
* indicate if a shelf-life is proposed in lieu of a re-test period (e.g. in the case of labile APIs)
(i) Composition, i.e. list of all components of the FPP and their amounts on a per
unit basis and percentage basis (including individual components of mixtures prepared
in-house (e.g. coatings) and overages, if any):
<complete with appropriate titles e.g. Core tablet (Layer 1, Layer 2, etc. as applicable),
Contents of capsule, Powder for injection>
Subtotal 1
Subtotal 2
Total
1 SUMMARY
1.1 Summary of bioequivalence studies performed
(Provide a brief description of each comparative bioavailability study included in the submission)
1.2 Tabulation of the composition of the formulation(s) proposed for marketing and those used for
bioequivalence studies
(State the location of the master formulae in the quality part of the submission)
(Tabulate the composition of the biobatch using the table below. For solid oral dosage forms the table
should contain only the ingredients in tablet core /contents of a capsule. A copy of the table should be
filled in for the film coating / hard capsule, if any.
Important: If the formulation proposed for marketing and those used for bioequivalence studies are
not identical, copies of this table should be filled in for each formulation with clear identification in
which bioequivalence study the respective formulation was used.)
Total
Equivalence of the compositions or justified
differences
Maximum intended commercial batch size
a) Study number:
b) Study title:
c) Location of study protocol:
d) Start and stop dates for each phase of the clinical study:
e) Dates of product administration:
2.1 ETHICS
a) State the name of review committee, date of approval of protocol and consent form and the
location of approval letter in the submission
2
Bioequivalence batches should be at least of pilot scale (10% of production scale or 100,000 capsules/tablets
whichever is the greater) and manufacturing method should be the same as for production scale.
a) List criteria used and all tests performed in order to judge health status
d) Report any results that were outside of study site normal values
(State location in submission of the summary of anomalous values)
b) Alternates
(Please note: Generally all subjects enrolled in the study should be included in the data set i.e.,
alternate subjects are strongly discouraged. However, in cases where there are alternate
subjects, describe the procedure of including/excluding the alternates and whether alternates
have been included in the study)
c) Withdrawals/dropouts
(Identify each withdrawal/dropout by subject and provide the reason for withdrawal/dropout
and at what point in the study the withdrawal/dropout occurred)
a) Batch number, size, date of manufacture and expiry date for the test product
b) Potency (measured content) of test product as a percentage of label claim as per validated assay
method
(This information should be cross-referenced to the location of the certificate of analysis in the
submission)
(Append to this template a copy of product labelling (snap shot of the box, on which the name
of the product, name and address of the manufacturer, batch number, and expiry date are
clearly visible on the labelling)
a) Name and manufacturer of the comparator product and market where the comparator product
was purchased
2.4.6 Blinding
2.4.6.1 Identify which of the following were blinded. If any of the groups were not blinded, provide a
justification for not doing so
2.4.6.2 Identify who held the study code and when the code was broken
4 PROTOCOL DEVIATIONS
(Describe any such deviations and discuss their implications with respect to bioequivalence)
(List any adverse events by subject number. State whether a reaction occurred following
administration of the test or reference product, identify any causal relationships, and note any
treatments required. State location of this summary in the submission.)
(Discuss the implications of the observed adverse events with respect to bioequivalence.)
b) State location in submission of (mean and individual) linear and semi-logarithmic subject drug
concentration vs. time plots
a) State how the pharmacokinetic parameters where calculated/obtained for AUC0-inf, AUC0-t, Cmax,
tmax, the elimination rate constant, and t½ (indicate location of description in protocol)
b) State whether actual sampling time points were used for estimation of the pharmacokinetic
parameters
Test Reference
AUC0-t
(units)
AUC0-inf
(units)
Cmax (units)
tmax (units)
t½ (units)
(State the method of calculation of the 90% confidence intervals for the ratio of test formulation
over the reference formulation and indicate how treatment, period, sequence and subjects within
sequence were included as factors in the ANOVA. Provide the following results from the ANOVA
(parametric) on the logarithmically transformed AUC0-t and CMAX and other relevant
parameters. State software used for computing ANOVA.)
a) Geometric means, results from ANOVA, Degrees of Freedom (DF) and derived CV (intra-
subject)
% Ratio of 90 %
Referenc
Parameter Test geometric Confidence DF CV (%)
e
means interval
AUC0-t (units)
AUC0-inf
(units)
Cmax (units)
(Compare the results, including mean values, inter- and intra-individual variability, of this study
with published results (literature, product information of reference product (innovator),
WHOPARs), and copies of the references used should be appended to this document)
7.2 Selectivity
(Address the methods to verify selectivity against endogenous/exogenous compounds & results)
7.3 Sensitivity
7.4 Carry-over
(State location in submission of tabulated raw data and back calculated data with descriptive
statistics)
c) List the back-calculated concentrations of the calibration standards of the validation runs
(highlight the values outside of the acceptance range, e.g., 15%, except 20% for LLOQ)
a) Identify the concentrations of the QC samples and the storage conditions employed prior to their
analysis
7.10 Stability
(For each section provide the location of the raw data, a description of the methodology
employed and a summary of the data.)
(State the location of the bioanalytical report for the analysis of the study subject samples)
(Confirm whether the method is the same as the validated method and whether the same
equipment was employed. Identify any differences between the validated method described above
in Section 7 and the method employed for subject sample analyses)
(Identify the time elapsed between the first day of sample collection and the last day of subject
sample analysis)
8.1.5 State whether all samples for a given subject were analyzed together in a single analysis
run
(State location in submission of tabulated raw data and back calculated data with descriptive
statistics)
b) State number of curves run during the study (valid and failed runs, including reasons of
failure).
d) List the back-calculated concentrations of the calibration standards of the study runs
(highlight the values outside of the acceptance range, e.g., 15%, except 20% for LLOQ)
a) Identify the concentrations of the QC samples, their date of preparation and the storage
conditions employed prior to their analysis
c) List the back-calculated concentrations of the QC samples of the study runs (highlight the
values outside of the acceptance range, e.g., 15%)
d) Discuss whether the concentrations of the QC sample concentrations are similar to the
concentrations observed in the study samples
e) State the percentage of QC samples per run with respect to the total number samples
assayed in each run
a) List re-analysed samples by sample identification and include the following information
for each re-analysis: initial value; reason for re-analysis; re-analysed value(s); accepted
value; and reason for acceptance
b) Report the number of re-analysis as a percentage of the total number samples assayed
c) List re-injected samples by sample identification and include the following information for
each re-injection: initial value; reason for re-injection; re-injected value; accepted value;
and reason for acceptance
d) Report the number of re-injections as a percentage of the total number samples assayed
(State location in the submission and summarize the results of incurred sample reanalysis,
including the number of subject samples included in ISR and the total number of samples
analysed in the study)
8.7 Chromatograms
(State the location in the submission where the sample chromatograms can be found. The
chromatograms should be obtained from a minimum of two analytical batches and include at
least 20% of the subjects, up to a maximum of five. A complete set includes standards, QC
samples, pre-dose and post-dose subject samples for both phases. Each chromatogram should
be clearly labelled with respect to the following: date of analysis; subject ID number; study
period; sampling time; analyte; standard or QC, with concentration; analyte and internal
standard peaks; peak heights and/or areas)
9 QUALITY ASSURANCE
(State locations in the submission where internal quality assurance methods and results are
described for each of study sites (see 3.2 b-d.)
(Provide a list of all monitoring and auditing reports of the study, and of recent inspections of
study sites by regulatory agencies. State locations in the submission of the respective reports for
each study site (see 3.2 b-d.)
<Applicant>
<Address>
<Address>
<Post code> <Town>
<Country
Dear Sir:
We are pleased to submit our Application Dossier(s) for the registration of human medicines in Liberia
for the following product(s):
<The application seeks market authorization for a new product not previously marketed in the
ECOWAS or any member country.>
<The application seeks a market authorization for a variation of <indicate the product and market
authorization # or previous application identifiers, e.g., LMHRA Registration numbers>>
<This submission responds to correspondence from <name of regulatory authority, (e.g., ECOWAS
or member country), dated <DAY, MONTH, YEAR>, related to application number <#####>. The
regulator’s correspondence is provided in module 1.1.2. The response to the correspondence is
provided in module 1.1.3.>
Soft copy
Hard copy
Both
We confirm that all future submissions for this specific product will be submitted in this same
format
We confirm that the electronic submission has been checked with up-to-date and state-of-the-art
antivirus software.
<xxx samples of the drug product have been submitted with this application.>
Yours sincerely,
…………………………………
<Signature>
<Name>
<Title>
<Phone number(s)>
<Email address>
Include the letter in Module 1 – Administration and Product Information, sub module 1.2.6 of the application
in CTD format
<Applicant>
<Address>
<Post code> <Town>
<Country
Dear Sir:
Consent is hereby granted to <LMRRA> to make reference to this company's Certificate(s) of Suitability (CEPs)
<number(s)> for <API(s) name(s)> in the evaluation of applications relating to the registration of <medicine
name(s)> submitted to <name of NMRA> by <applicant’s name>.
This consent <includes / does not include> authorization to supply information or extracts from or the whole
of the data to:
A formal agreement exists between the applicant of the medicine and the manufacturer of the API, which
ensures that information will be communicated between them and to the <NMRA> before any significant
change is made to the site of manufacture, manufacturing procedure or quality control specifications of the API.
Except as permitted by the WAHO guidelines relating to changes to medicines, such changes will not be made
to the API to be used in manufacture of the medicine destined to be distributed in Liberia an ECOWAS member
country before written approval is granted by the Liberia Medicines and Health Products Regulatory Authority.
I understand that the consequences of failure to obtain approval for changes where approval is necessary may
include de-registration and recall of batches of medicines.
Any questions arising from the Liberia Medicines and Health Products Regulatory Authority.
Yours faithfully