CHECK LIST
Check List (for Bridge Works) for scrutiny and sanction of Estimate.
Name of the work:
RECONSTRUCTION OF NARROW MINOR BRIDGE AT KM I7/6 OF
BHUVANAGIRI – KURINJIPADY ROAD (MD–816)
1. Name of work(i) : Reconstruction of Narrow Minor Bridge
at Km 17 / 6 of
Bhuvanagiri - Kurinjipady Road .( MD - 816 ).
2. Name of the scheme under which : COMPREHENSIVE ROAD INFRASTRUTURE
work is taken up DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME ( CRIDP SCHEME )
For the year 2017 -2018
3. Administrative sanction of Government : G.O No: 806, dated, 24.10.2017
G.O.No and Date
4. Whether The Nomenclature is as per G.O :
5. Change in scope of sanction if any : -----
6. Amount Sanctioned :
7. The amount of estimate now prepared : Rs lakhs
8. Whether the estimate amount is within :
Allowable limit?
9. Revised Administrative sanction if any : ----
10. Whether the following details are enclosed.
Site plan, Index Map, L.S and C.S. of Stream
And Alignment of Road, General drawing,
Details working drawings data with quarry
Chat,r quarry map detailed estimate,abstract
Specification Report,etc., : Yes
11. EXISTING BRIDGE STRUCTURE IF ANY:-
1. Whether salient details of the existing
Bridge structure are furnished : yes
2. Whether the strength of the existing
Bridge structure as assessed and
Found to be unsafe : ----
3. Incase if it is safe as per as
Theoretical calculation whether
Justification for reconstruction of the
Bridge are given : ----
ALIGNMENT:-
1. Whether alternative alignment are
Studied : Proposed Alignment follows
If so whether details of each the. Existing one.
2. Alignment their merits and demerits
Are given in the estimate and the
Best is selected : ------
3. Whether the alignment proposed
Is approved by competent authority?
Officer to the approved alignment : Yes
4. Whether the reference to the bench
mark which has been used for
carrying out survey is given : Yes
5. As it noted in the site plan : Yes
HYDRAULIC PARTICULARS:-
1. Whether the following are
correctly fixed :
a.(i) L.B.L. site : RL(+) 97.300 m
(ii) M.W.L site :
(iii) M.F.L site : RL(+) 99.900 m
b. Sill level at site proposed : RL(+) 97.300 m
c.(i) Bed slope : 0.0013
(ii) M.F.L.slope : 0.0013
d. Co.efficient of Rugosity : 0.0350
f. Afflux assumed : 0.150m
IV. 1. Design discharge adopted : 107.740 Cumecs
2. Is there any variation in calculation
of discharge by various methods? : Yes
If so how much>?the criteria
Adopted in fixing the design discharge :
Discharge Design Variation Percentage
Calculated discharge
a. Catchment area method : ----
b. Area velocity method : 54.2931 Cumecs
c. Actually observed discharge : -----
d. As available in records of P.W.D. : 3804 c/s or 107.740 Cumecs
e. With the certificate of the concerned
Executive Engineer P.W.D : -----
3. The reason for adopting the particular
Discharges for design purposes :Maximum flood discharge is adopted
for design purposes
The discharge particulars are tabulated below :-
Discharge by Area - Velocity method
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name of cross section Velocity in m/sec Discharge in cum/sec
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since, the bund levels of all the Cross Sections
except 50.00 m U/ S and Site, are having less than
the MFL slope line and hence not Considered for
design purposes.
C.S at 50.00 m up stream 0.4161 45.7403
C.S on site 1.5161 54.2931
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AVERAGE VALUES = 50.0167
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i) Maxium discharge by Area – velocity Method ------------ : 54.2931 Cumecs
ii) Discharge furnished by PWD = 3804 C/S or ------------ : 107.740 Cumecs
iii) Discharge by any other Rational Method ------------ ------
Therefore ,
Design Discharge = 107.740 cumecs
Velocity at Site = 1.5161 m/sec
LINEAR WATER WAY:
1. Whether the linear waterway is
calculated for design discharge : Yes
2. Whether the linear waterway adopted
estimate is based on design discharge
if no,how P.W.D fixed and whether it
is agreeable : Yes
3. Whether linear waterway provided is
studied considering the linear waterway
available in existing bridge in the same
river nearby upstream and downstream : Yes
4. Is there any railway bridge immediately
Upstream or downstream? If so, what is
The L.W.W adopted : -----
5. Has concurrence of Railways been
Obtained for L.W.W proposals? : Does not arise
6. Whether economic span is worked
out and adopted : Yes
7. Whether vertical clearance required
for the discharges as per I.R.C. code
and Navigation clearance if any etc., : Yes
if given
SUB SOIL PARTICULARS:
1. Whether Trial pit particulars,boring
details are furnished :Yes
2.Whether adequate number of borings
are taken in the approved alignment : Three bores were
conducted.
3. Whether the boring is taken sufficiently
below the proposed foundation level
upto 1.5 times the width of foundation
or atleast on bore hole upto the level
of hard rock : Yes
4.Whether identification of soil is done
correctly and SPT values furnished
in bearing capacity of the soil found out
at foundation layers. : Yes
5.Whether the certificate of the Assistant
Divl.Engr. for the verification of soil
with bore is attached : Yes
DESIGN OF FOUNDATION:
1. Whether the expert opinion regarding
the suitability of the rock strata available
is obtained in the case of Major Bridge
with foundation of rocks? : ----
2. Whether type of foundation proposed
is feasible for the site : Yes
3. Whether the economical aspects are
Examined? : Yes
4. Whether Lacey’s Silt factor are
correctly decided Result of experiments
if any may be given : yes
5. a. Whether the depth of foundation is
well below the maximum scour level : Yes
b. Is Codal Provision of minimum 2m
below maximum scour satisfied : Yes
c. If not the reasons or how the bed is
protected from scouring? : -----
6. Whether the pressure of stresses
developed in bottom of foundation soil
due to super imposed loads is within
safe bearing capacity of soil or allowable
stresses at foundation level? : Yes
SUB-STRUCTURE.
1. Whether type of sub-structure proposed
for abutments and piers is suitable for
the flow condition of the river check out
water and batter? : Yes
2. Whether type of Sub-structure proposed
For abutment is suited to site condition
Are economical : Yes
3. Whether stresses developed at sill level
Are within permissible limits : Yes
4. Whether the substructure is checked for
Its safety when adjacent span is dislodged: Yes
5. Is the design approved for bearing? : Yes
6. Whether any arrangements are made to
replace the bearing in future :
SUPER-STRUCTURE
1. Whether type of super structure
Proposed is suitable to site condition
And approaches : Yes
2. Whether the super structure is designed
for the worst possible combination of
loading as per code : Yes
3. Whether the design calculations
are furnished : Yes
4. Whether strength of concrete ,steel
And stresses are permissible as
Per codal provision? : Yes
5. Whether foot path is necessary
And if so it provided? :Safety Kerb 750mm wide
6. Are the hand rails provided as per
Approved design?. : Crash Barrier
7. Whether any special protection to
Corrosion is considered due to site
Condition : -----
8. Whether the possibility of heavy wind
Pressure, earthquake of flood etc.,
Considered : -----
9. Whether the type of wearing coat
Proposed is agreeable : Yes
10. How is the cross chamber provided : 2.5%
APPROACHES:
1. Whether pavement design is furnished
is it proposed on soaked CBR.value of
sub-grade soil : yes
2. Whether gravel soil and filling
Proposed below abutment : yes
1. Whether any filter materials as per
Code is proposed being the drainage
Arrangements in abutments and wings? : yes
2. Does it satisfy the requirements of P.I
& L.L as per rules : yes
3. Whether the estimate for approach
Road is based on :
a. Level along L.S & C.S and quantity
Is worked out?. : Yes
b. Are the standard adopted in all
Aspects lie width side slope and
Right of way : Yes
c. Is the local earth suitable and
Adequate for fill and foundation
Layers?.whether provisions made
For conveying suitable earth for
Forming the approaches sand
Gravel or metal : Yes
d. Whether the earth,quarry is
Approved with reference to
Availability and suitability : Yes
e. Whether provision is made for
Extra lead and lift for earth : Yes
f. Whether approach alignment is
Designed with a suitable horizontal
Curves and vertical curves : Yes
g. Whether suitable camber and
Gradient are provided : Yes
h . Whether the roads level has been
fixed for corresponding to the
bridge estimate and the reference
bench mark : Yes
k. Does the rate for earth work
Provided for compacted volumes : Yes
I. Whether soaked CBR value of
The subgrade is found out and
Pavement is suitably designed : Yes
l. Is adequate provision for L.A.made
Whether fund at acquisition
Plan and schedule are available? : -----
RATES:
1. Whether current / year rates
Adopted : yes
2. Whether the foundation E.W. rate
Include for bailing charges and
Strutting all labour, materials
Etc., complete : Yes
3. Whether any provision is made
For a rate for removal of sand
Upto sill level without failing? : yes
4 Whether concrete rate is
Inclusive of form work bailing
Out water etc., and vibration
Charges? : yes
5. Whether formation rate is
inclusive of compaction allowance
and watering. : yes
6. Whether the rates for other items
are checked with reference to
standard data or approved data
as the case be and are the
provisions are just and adequate?: yes
XIII. OTHER ITEMS
Whether the estimate is provided with
Adequate provision for the following items
1. Provision of suitable bearings Yes
2. Provision of expansion joints Yes
3. Provision of seepage pipes Yes
4. Provision of Drainage spouts Yes
5. Provision of Dowel bar,anchorage
rods ,if necessary ----
6. Provision for river training works if any -----
7. Provision for land acquisition yes
And compensation to be paid If any : ----
8. Provision for Cross Drainage : ----
9. Provision for Name Board,
Guardstone,km stones
Improvements to geometrics
Approach junction etc., : Yes
10. Provision for quality control and
testing : yes
11 Provision for bore shed
watchman pay,inspection shed,etc: ------
12. Provision for works charged Esst
and Contingencies : yes
13. Provision for diversion and
Maintenance with a detailed
Sub-estimate : yes
14. Provision for variation in cost of
materials.if any : Yes
15. Any special provision in cost of
materials,if any : ------
TECHNICAL SANCTION:
1. Estimate Amount :
2. Monetary limit for the
sanctioning authority :
3. Sanction number and date :
