Assessment Manual
For
Micro Project
ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING Diploma
Programme
Maharashtra State
Board of Technical Education, Mumbai
(Autonomous) (ISO-9001-2008) (ISO/IEC 27001:2013)
1
A PROJECT REPORT
ON
SUBIMITTED BY
1. Kamble Amruta Dipak (2019PEE316)
2. Patil Sakshi Dhanaji (2019PEE317)
3. Dhumale Pranita Suresh (2019PEE318)
4. Keripale Shreya Rajkumar (2019PEE319)
5. Bagal Ambika Shivaji (2019PEE320)
6. Patil Shruti Devagonda (2019PEE321)
UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF: Mr. NARAYAN APTE
WALCHAND COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, SANGLI
DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
YEAR: 2020-21
SEMESTER: 4TH
2
WALCHAND COLLEGE OF ENGINERING, SANGLI
(An Autonomous Institute)
Visharmbag, Sangli-419415(M.S), India.
Website: www.walchandsangli.ac.in
CERTIFICATE
DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
This is so certified that the project entitled “” is bonified work carried out by the student mentioned
below, under my supervision and guidance
Submitted by
i. Kamble Amruta Dipak
ii. Patil Sakshi Dhanaji
iii. Dhumale Pranita Suresh
iv. Keripale Shreya Rajkumar
v. Bagal Ambika Shivaji
vi. Patil Shruti Devagonda
Head of Department Project Guide
3
Annexure – I
PART A – Micro-Project Proposal
DEMORGAN’S theorem No. 1
1.0 Brief Introduction
DEMORGAN’S First theorem proves that when two (or more)
input variables are AND ’ed and negated, they are equivalent to the OR of the
complements of the individual variables. Thus, the equivalent of the NAND
function will be a negative-OR function, proving that A.B = A+B.
2.0 Aim of the Micro-Project
This Micro-Project aims at:
1. Simulate DEMORGAN’S theorem no. 1
3.0 Intended Course Outcomes
a. The implementation of the basic gate operations with
alternative gates, particularly with NAND and NOR gates
which are readily available in IC form.
4.0 Literature Review
I. Digital Systems Principals and Applications (Author: Ronald
j. TOCCI, Neal S. Widmer): -
This book provides detailed information on DEMORGAN’S
theorem. It also provides implication of DEMORGAN’S theorem. This book
gives detailed information about logic gates and universal gates.
4
II. Digital Systems (Author: Ronald j. TOCCI, Neal S. Widmer):
This book gives us simplification of DEMORGAN’S theorem. It
also gives information about Computer Programming languages.
4.0 Proposed Methodology
1) The first task was selection of group of six members.
2) The different microprojects was searched based on syllabus.
3) Small micro projects were selected and discussed with subject
teacher.
4) Project was finalized.
5) Under the guidance of teacher learned that how to simulate
circuit.
6) Started collecting information for report.
7) Under the guidance of teacher simulated circuit and ran it.
8) Finally, after all this we started working on the micro project.
5.0 Resources Required
S. No. Name of Resource/material Specifications Qty
1 Mobile App on Android OS Everycircuit Android 1
Application
2 Software on Windows 10 Proteus 8 Professional software 1
6.0 Action Plan (Sequence and time required for major activities for 8
Weeks)
S. Details of activity Planned Planned Name of Responsible
No. Start date Finish date Team Members
1 Making group for project 20 May 22 May Shreya, Ambika,
2021 2021 Pranita, Shruti,
Amruta, Sakshi
2 Searching subject for micro 24 May 27 May Shreya, Ambika,
project 2021 2021 Pranita, Shruti,
5
Amruta
3 Finalizing the micro project 28 May 28 May Shreya, Ambika,
2021 2021 Pranita, Shruti,
Sakshi
4 Learning how to simulate 1 June 2021 4 June 2021 Shreya, Ambika,
circuit? Pranita, Shruti,
Amruta, Sakshi
5 Collecting information about 5 June 7 June 2021 Ambika, Shreya,
project 2021 Sakshi,
6 Simulating Circuit 8 June 2021 8 June 2021 Shruti, Ambika,
Pranita
7 Making report for micro project 10 June 13 June Shreya, Shruti,
2021 2021 Pranita
8 Submitting report Shruti, Ambika,
Pranita, Shruti,
Amruta, Sakshi
**************
Annexure – II
PART B – Micro-Project Report
DEMORGAN’S theorem No. 1
1.0 Rationale
DEMORGAN’S First theorem proves that when two (or more)
input variables are AND ’ed and negated, they are equivalent to the OR of the
complements of the individual variables. Thus, the equivalent of the NAND
function will be a negative-OR function, proving that A.B = A+B.
6
2.0 Course Outcomes Addressed
1. Simulate DEMORGAN’S theorem no. 1
3.0 Literature Review
I. Digital Systems Principals and Applications (Author: Ronald
j. TOCCI, Neal S. Widmer): -
This book provides detailed information on DEMORGAN’S
theorem. It also provides implication of DEMORGAN’S theorem. This book
gives detailed information about logic gates and universal gates.
II. Digital Systems (Author: Ronald j. TOCCI, Neal S. Widmer):
This book gives us simplification of DEMORGAN’S theorem. It
also gives information about Computer Programming languages.
4.0 Actual Methodology Followed
1) The first task was selection of group of six members.
2) The different microprojects was searched based on syllabus.
3) Small micro projects were selected and discussed with subject
teacher.
4) Project was finalized.
5) Under the guidance of teacher learned that how to simulate
circuit.
6) Started collecting information for report.
7
7) Under the guidance of teacher simulated circuit and ran it.
8) Finally, after all this we started working on the micro project.
5.0 Actual Resources Used
S. No. Name of Resource/material Specifications Qty
1 Mobile App on Android OS Everycircuit Android 1
Application
2 Software on Windows 10 Proteus 8 Professional software 1
6.0 Outputs of the Micro-Project
A. A NAND gate is equivalent to an inversion followed by OR
gate
8
TRUTH TABLE
A B A.B A.B A B A+B
0 0 0 1 1 1 1
0 1 0 1 1 0 1
1 0 0 1 0 1 1
1 1 1 0 0 0 0
9
B. A NOR gate is equivalent to an inversion followed by an AND
TRUTH TABLE
A B A+B A+B
A B A.B
0 0 0 1
1 1 1
0 1 1 0
1 0 0
1 0 1 0
0 1 0
1 1 1 0
0 0 0
10
11
7.0 Skill Developed / learning out of this Micro-Project
We had learned the circuit simulating techniques.
We improve our leadership quality.
We improve our presentation skill.
8.0 Applications of this Micro-Project
To solve the various Boolean algebraic expressions.
It is used for implementing the basic gate operation lokes
NAND gate and NOR gate.
**************
12
Annexure – III
Teacher Evaluation Sheet
Name of Student:
Enrollment No.
Name of Programme:
Semester:
Course Title:
Code:
Title of the Micro-Project:
Course Outcomes Achieved:
Evaluation as per Suggested Rubric for Assessment of Micro Project
(Please tick in appropriate cell for each characteristic)
Sr. Characteristic Poor Average Good Excellent
No. to be assessed ( Marks 1- ( Marks 4 - ( Marks 6 - 8 ) ( Marks 9- 10 )
3) 5)
1 Relevance to Relate to Related to Take care of at- Take care of more
the course very few LOs some Los least one CO than one CO
2 Literature Not more than At-least 5 At –least 7 About 10 relevant
Survey two sources relevant relevant sources, latest
/information (primary and sources, at least sources, latest
collection secondary), 2 latest
very old
reference
3 Completion of Completed Completed 50 Completed 60 to Completed more
the Target as less than 50% to 60% 80% than 80 %
per project
proposal
13
Sr. Characteristic Poor Average Good Excellent
No. to be assessed ( Marks 1- ( Marks 4 - ( Marks 6 - 8 ) ( Marks 9- 10 )
3) 5)
4 Analysis of Sample Size Sufficient and Sufficient and Enough data
Data and small, data appropriate appropriate collected by
representation neither sample, enough sample, enough sufficient and
organized nor data generated data generated appropriate
presented but not which is sample size.
well organized and organized and Proper inferences
not presented presented well drawn by
well. No or but poor organizing and
poor inferences presenting data
inferences drawn through tables,
drawn charts and graphs.
5 Quality of Incomplete Just Well Well
Prototype/Mod fabrication/as assembled/fabri assembled/fabri assembled/fabrica
el sembly. cated and parts cated with ted with proper
are not proper functioning parts.
functioning functioning In proper shape,
well. Not in parts. In proper within tolerance
proper shape, shape, within dimensions and
dimensions tolerance good
beyond dimensions and finish/appearance.
tolerance limit. good Creativity in
Appearance/fin finish/appearanc design and use of
ish is shabby. e. But no material
creativity in
design and use
of material
6 Report Very short, Nearly Detailed, correct Very detailed,
Preparation poor quality sufficient and and clear correct, clear
sketches, correct details description of description of
Details about about methods, methods, methods,
methods, material, materials, materials,
material, precautions and precautions and precautions and
precaution conclusion, but Conclusions. conclusions.
and clarity is not Sufficient Enough tables,
conclusions there in Graphic charts and
omitted, some presentation. Description. sketches
details are But not enough
wrong graphic
description.
14
Sr. Characteristic Poor Average Good Excellent
No. to be assessed ( Marks 1- ( Marks 4 - ( Marks 6 - 8 ) ( Marks 9- 10 )
3) 5)
7 Presentation Major Includes major Includes major Well organized,
information is information but information and includes major
not included, not well well organized information ,well
information is organized and but not presented
not well not presented presented well
organized. well
8 Any other
(depending upon
nature of
project: please
write indicators
by pen)
Defense Could not Replied to Replied Replied most of
9 reply to considerable properly to the questions
considerable number of considerable properly
number of questions but number of
question. not very question.
properly
Micro-Project Evaluation Sheet
Process Assessment Product Assessment Total
Marks
10
Part A - Project Methodology Part B - Project individual
Project (2 marks) Report/Working Presentation/Viva
Proposal Model (4 marks)
(2 marks) (2 marks)
Note:
Every course teacher is expected to assign marks for group evolution for each group of students in first
3 columns as per rubrics & individual evaluation in 4 TH column for each group of students as per
rubrics based on viva.
Comments/Suggestions about team work/leadership/inter-personal
communication (if any)
15
Any Other Comment:
Name and designation of the Faculty Member:
Signature:
16
