Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
53 views5 pages

Block 5a: Structural Inequality: Fall 2016 NUB Instructor Guide For

This document provides an instructor guide for a class discussing structural inequality. The objective is to introduce students to the concept that inequality is not just individual but is also created and maintained by societal institutions. The class will define what structures/institutions are, define structural inequality, and discuss two videos illustrating it - one about historical structural racism in housing and the other about a contemporary example. Peer mentors are advised to share personal experiences related to which institutions make them feel included versus excluded and to help lead discussion of the second video.

Uploaded by

Ridhi Kakkar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
53 views5 pages

Block 5a: Structural Inequality: Fall 2016 NUB Instructor Guide For

This document provides an instructor guide for a class discussing structural inequality. The objective is to introduce students to the concept that inequality is not just individual but is also created and maintained by societal institutions. The class will define what structures/institutions are, define structural inequality, and discuss two videos illustrating it - one about historical structural racism in housing and the other about a contemporary example. Peer mentors are advised to share personal experiences related to which institutions make them feel included versus excluded and to help lead discussion of the second video.

Uploaded by

Ridhi Kakkar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Fall 2016 NUB Instructor Guide for Block 5a:

Structural Inequality
Overview and Objectives
The objective of this block is to introduce students to the concept of structural inequality. Many students believe
that inequality/oppression is an individual occurrence and problem—one that can be lessened or eradicated if
oppressed people “just stood up for themselves” and if oppressive individuals or groups of people “simply stopped
being oppressive” (e.g. sexist, racist, homophobic, etc.). As we know, however, inequality is also created and
maintained by various societal institutions. In addition to individuals changing their own oppressive attitudes and
behaviors, institutions must also change in order to create lasting and profound social change. In this block, as well
as the next one, students will learn that oppression is not only individual/interpersonal but also
institutional/systemic—a fact that has far-reaching implications in terms of the reproduction of privledge for
various individuals and groups in society.

Peer Mentor Moments Highlights


o Peer Mentors should think of personal examples related to the four o 2-3 videos on structural
questions posed in lecture (see Lecture, item #2a-d below). Be prepared inequality; links below
to share your some of your responses during class. and in PPT.
o Peer Mentors should ask instructors if they are needed to lead the o Block 5a PPT.
discussion of the second video. If so, watch the 6 minute video and o [Special Instructions]
review the questions below.

Class Outline (use in conjunction with Block 5a Structural Inequality PPT):


I. Introduction: (1 minute). [Prior to class, open the PPT to the first slide entitled “Learning Objectives.” You
do not need to go over the Learning Objectives as students will most likely read them before class starts.] Today’s
class picks up where we left off last week in our study of diversity and will cover the learning objectives listed on
this PowerPoint slide. So far, we’ve been talking about how racism, sexism, and the like play out on a
micro/individual level through microaggressions, unconscious biases, and a failure to recognize the intersectionality
of our own or others’ identities. But these inequalities can also be deeply embedded on a macro or
structural/institutional level as well. To understand this further, we have to first define “structures” (or
“institutions”) and explain how they function. Then we will define “structural inequality” and discuss two related
videos that illustrate the concept both historically and in contemporary times.

II. Lecture (12-15 minutes): Go through the slides 2-7 of the PPT. Talking points below and on PPT:
Note: Since this lecture can be dry, you might consider calling on students or asking for volunteers to read the various definitions and
examples on the PPT slides. This tactic will keep them engaged and on their toes.

1. To define structural inequality, we have to first define the term “structures.” Structures, or institutions,
are “social organizations that involve established patterns of behavior organized around particular purposes.
NUB Instructor Outline Block 5a: Structural Inequality 2
They function through social norms (cultural expectations), which […] are institutionalized and patterned into
organizations and sometimes established as rules and/or laws.”1

2. According to Shaw and Lee, “Major institutions in our society include the family, marriage, the
economy [including business and industry], government and criminal justice systems, religion,
education, science, health and medicine, mass media, the military, and sports” (63). Here we can
acknowledge that these structures/institutions are important and powerful ones in our society; some may be more
or less important to us personally but as a whole they are all very important to the fabric of our society. What’s
more, these institutions are socializing agents—we learn about ourselves and other people from our families,
our schools, our government and criminal justice systems, etc.

As you look at this list of different societal institutions, I want you to think about the following questions: (a)
Which of these institutions make you feel good or good about yourself? (b) Which ones make you feel safe,
included, or whole? (c) Which of these institutions don’t make you feel good or good about yourself? (d)
Which ones don’t make you feel included, safe, or whole? [While students think about these questions, the
instructor and peer mentor should give their own personal examples. There won’t be time to hear students’
responses, however. You may want to note that institutions that don’t make one feel good, included, safe, or
whole can fail to be oppressive: the NBA, for example, presumably doesn’t make non-basketball fans feel
good, included, safe, or whole, but that doesn’t make it oppressive!] After sharing, tell students that their
responses to these questions may indicate their varying degrees of privilege and/or inequality in society.

3. Societal institutions have their own distinct set of rules, ideologies, roles, practices, laws, and
resources, which, in turn, are distributed to individuals and groups in society. This distribution often
creates and maintains advantage for some and disadvantage for others depending on their social location (i.e.
factors gender, gender identity, sex, race, ethnicity, class, sexual orientation, age, religion, education, etc.).

The distribution can be intentional or unintentional (e.g. established laws vs. company practices that only
benefit some workers) and direct or indirect (e.g., raises vs. preferential treatment of a certain gender or race).
Returning to the first two points, let’s think about our own discipline/field of study. [Here instructors can
briefly mention how their discipline relates to the first two points. Criminal justice instructors, for example,
can discuss (or ask for examples) historic and contemporary rules, ideologies, roles, and so forth in law
enforcement, the judicial system, and so forth. Alternately, instructors can discuss a more general societal
institution that students can relate to, such as marriage/family, media, or sports.]

4. Combined, all of these societal institutions create a web (or system) of advantage/privilege and
disadvantage/inequality for different individuals and groups in society. In other words, institutions
create systems of privilege and inequality (e.g. race, racism, and white privilege) that are structural barriers to
equality and inclusiveness. This is known as structural inequality.

5. Structural inequality thus refers to the system of privilege and inequality created and maintained by
interlocking societal institutions. As you may have heard on the news, or will read about in other courses,
structural inequality is also referred to as systemic inequality, systematic/institutionalized oppression, or
specific subtypes such as structural racism, institutionalized homophobia, or systematic sexism. As all of these


1 Source: Susan Shaw and Janet Lee, eds. Women’s Voices, Feminist Visions: Classic and Contemporary Readings. 6th ed. New York: Mc-Graw Hill,

2015, 63.
NUB Instructor Outline Block 5a: Structural Inequality 3
terms suggest, inequality is embedded within and across institutions. In other words, the “major institutions in
society are interconnected and work to support and maintain one another” (Shaw and Lee 65).

III. Video #1 Debrief/Discussion (6 minutes long; 10 minutes for discussion):


Video #1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mW764dXEI_8

Let’s now look at a specific example of structural inequality. Although this is an example of structural inequality
from the past, many people are still living with its effects in the present day. This video examines structural
inequality (or in this case, structural racism) against African Americans in the housing industry. As you watch the
video, listen closely and make a list of the different societal institutions that were responsible for creating and
maintaining structural racism in terms of housing segregation and other unfair practices against African Americans.
Also, listen closely for the word “institutionalized and the context in which it is used. [Play the 6 minute video
“Race: The House We Live In” located at the URL above and on the PPT.]

Debrief Questions (10 minutes, located on PPT):

1. According to the video, what institutions worked together to create and maintain structural racism
against African Americans in the form of housing segregation and other unfair practices? Consider
making a list of answers on the board. Remind students that all of the institutions working together in these
oppressive ways are what makes this a form of “structural/systemic” inequality. [Answers include: the
government in the form of the Federal Housing Administration as well as other federal programs and banks;
business/industry in terms of unfair real estate practices and other discriminatory housing market and private
industry practices; the military who made black GIs serve separately and who continued to be perceived as
“separate” when they applied for loans and tried to acquire real estate in desired areas; etc.]

2. What happened as a result of this widespread form of structural racism? Think about both short- and
long-term effects and consequences. After students supply some examples, briefly explain that housing
segregation created not only racism but also poverty (or at least wealth inequality) for many black individuals
and families; this, in turn, affected other institutions such marriage/family, the economy, education (i.e. where
one goes to school and the quality of education one gets often depends on where one lives—a point made in
the second video below), and so forth. Tell students that many individuals, families, and communities are still
living with the effects of housing discrimination in the present—even as close to home as Buffalo and
Rochester. [Answers to the question include: housing segregation, redlining, black families had to rent so could
not gain equity or, in the long term, finance their children’s college education, save for retirement, generate
wealth for themselves and the next generation, etc.]

IV. Video #2 Debrief/Discussion (6 minutes long; 10 minutes for discussion):

Video #2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_hx30zOi9I

Note: To break things up, you may consider having your Peer Mentor ask this next set of questions. You
can also have students discuss with a partner their response to one or more of the questions. This will give
all students a chance to answer the questions.

Here’s another video that addresses the topic of race and racism. As you watch this video, make a list of different
institutions that are involved in creating and maintaining structural inequality for Black Americans. [Play the 6
minute video “Racism: Is it Over Yet?” located at the URL above and on the PPT.]
NUB Instructor Outline Block 5a: Structural Inequality 4
Debrief Commentary/Questions (10 minutes, located on PPT):

1. In this video, Laci Green is in dialogue with what we’ve been learning and discussing in our diversity
unit. First, she mentions that for most of her life she was “blissfully unaware” that she was white because her
race never affected her; in fact, she tells us, her race was a huge benefit that she never knew she had. This is a
concept known as white privilege, which scholar Peggy McIntosh defines as “an invisible package of
unearned assets that [white people] can count on cashing in each day, but about which [they were] meant to
remain oblivious.”2 Speaking directly to this concept, Green asks “What advantages has white America been
given without even realizing it?” If the phrase ‘white privilege’ is making some students defensive, feel free to
talk about the “advantages” of being white—but do make sure they are familiar with the concept and its most
common name (‘white privilege’).

Green also tells us that she only really understood the individual/interpersonal dimension of racism—racial
slurs, hatred, discrimination, the KKK. She then lists off all of the different institutional/structural forms of
inequality that are related to race. What were some examples of structural inequality that she lists? What
are some specific institutions that were mentioned or alluded to? [Answers include: media coverage,
politics, housing segregation/redlining, education, jobs, the economy, criminal justice in the form of policing,
police brutality, sentencing, mass incarceration, etc.]

2. According to Green, why is it hard for some white Americans to understand that racism is still a
problem today? [Answers include: because we are only taught the individual/interpersonal dimension of race,
because we don’t have personal experience with racism, because racism is so deeply entrenched in our societal
institutions that it can be hard to see; etc.]

3. What solutions does Green offer to combat racism? What solutions do you have in general and in
terms of our discipline/field of study? For instance, what might be needed in the workplace to
increase diversity and lessen potential individual or institutional forms of racism? [Answers to the first
question include: acknowledge racism, acknowledge that the system is unfair, and acknowledge that racism is a
powerful institution that has a long history, one that can’t be eradicated overnight. For the second question, get
students to think about the importance of intersectionality, recognizing unconscious biases, avoiding
microaggressions, and other things covered in this unit. Feel free to modify the third question to suit your discipline or to
address it yourself—for example, what is already being done in the workplace to increase diversity, inclusiveness, and
multiculturalism? What might students’ future roles be like in these capacities?]

V. Video #3 Debrief/Discussion (90 seconds long; 3 minutes for discussion):

Note: Depending on how talkative students are after the first two videos, you may not have time to show
this video. Skip it if need be. If all time estimations above and below are followed, however, there should
be enough time for this video.

Video #3:http://www.nbcnews.com/video/obama-confederate-flag-is-reminder-of-systemic-oppression-471961155680

As the caption indicates, this video features President Obama’s “push to remove the Confederate flag from the
South Carolina Capitol” on June 26, 2015. [Play the 90 second video located at the URL above and on PPT.]

2 Source: Susan Shaw and Janet Lee, eds. Women’s Voices, Feminist Visions: Classic and Contemporary Readings. 6th ed. New York: Mc-Graw Hill,

2015, 86.
NUB Instructor Outline Block 5a: Structural Inequality 5
Debrief Questions (3 minutes, located on PPT):

1. In this video, President Obama declares that “the confederate flag is a reminder of systemic
oppression,” which is a synonym for structural inequality. What do you think Obama means by this?
[Pause and see what students have to say.] In other words, which of the institutions listed here [on the PPT
slide] came together to create and maintain the system of slavery? How? [Here and in the next question, you will
learn what students know (or don’t know) about slavery.]

2. Time permitting. Which of these institutions were positively affected/advantaged by the system of slavery and
which ones were negatively affected/disadvantaged by slavery? [Here you can reiterate the point that societal
institutions function in ways that create advantage/privilege for some individuals and groups in society and
disadvantage/oppression for others.]

VI. Assignment Reminder. For classes that meet twice a week, remind students that the Great Rate Debate
Assignment is due next class. Tell them to closely annotate the readings so they can successfully complete the
assignment and prepare for class discussion.

VII. Closing thoughts (2 minutes): So what’s the big picture here? Why is understanding structural
inequality important? There’s a lot that can be said, but here’s one major thing that I want you to remember. First,
as we’ve discussed there is a difference between individual/interpersonal inequality and structural inequality.
Oftentimes, we think that inequality—something like sexism or racism or homophobia—can be lessened or
eradicated if oppressed people “just stood up for themselves” and if oppressive individuals or groups of people
“simply stopped being oppressive” (e.g. sexist, racist, homophobic, etc.). As we’ve learned today, however,
inequality is also created and maintained by various societal institutions. In fact, it can be so deeply entrenched that
it can be hard to see let alone understand. In addition to individuals changing their own oppressive attitudes and
behaviors, institutions must also change in order to create lasting and profound social change. And that’s where you
come in: you can (and perhaps already are) be part of the change on both individual and institutional levels. Think
of the roles that you already play in life, as well as the ones that you will play in the future, as students, friends,
parents, bosses, employees, community and church leaders, teachers, social workers, police officers, doctors, nurses,
and so forth. And that’s the funny thing about institutions…as big and important and powerful as they are…they
are still run by human beings and we are the ones, like many social justice leaders before us, who can make further
change.
Special Instructions
General Population: Gratitude Journaling! Students should list 5 things they are grateful for in the
Journal section of the planner at the back of the planner, just one sentence about each thing.

Meditation Cohort: Open and close the class with the two meditation exercises sent to you by email.

Gratitude Journaling Cohort: Gratitude Journaling! Students should list 5 things they are grateful for
in the Journal section of the planner at the back of the planner, just one sentence about each thing.

Alcohol Journaling Cohort: No journaling: follow the general Instructor’s Guide above.

Control Cohort: No journaling: follow the general Instructor’s Guide above.

Compiled in Summer 2016 by Hope L. Russell, Adjunct Professor of Women’s Studies, and Abigail Levin, NUB Co-Director. Much of this
material is drawn from Russell’s out-of-class NUB diversity presentations in Fall 2015 and Spring 2016 NUB Faculty Training.

You might also like