CHAPTER-V
CONCLUSION
Human rights have to do with the all-round development
of the human person in harmony with that of his fellow beings in the
totality of the relations in a society. The concept of human rights is
necessarily evolving in nature, a space with the evolution of human
civilization in the context of a changing social, political, economic and
cultural milieu. It is therefore, a daunting task of the State to create
societal conditions which will enable a person to nourish his best self in
the society.
Rights and duties are co-reiated. They are co-related in
the sense that a person’s obligation becomes conditional for the
enjoyment of the rights of others. The concept of human rights centres
around individual, whose survival and existence would be the main
concern of all categories of rights, be it social, political, economic or
cultural. Rights are also regarded as universal. Impresctible,
indivisible and interdependent. The indivisibility of rights is established
by the fact that the socio-economic rights are prerequisite to make civil
and political rights meaningful. Human rights can be best protected
and guaranteed in a democratic polity, in particular which is
characterised by certain institutions like Constitution, rule of law,
independent and impartial judiciary, popular legislature, multi-party
system, free press, pressure groups, various civil and democratic rights
groups, etc. All these features embody the principles of a liberal
154
democracy, whereby the rights of citizens are legally and largely
ensured.
HUMAN RIGHTS: A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
Mankind aims at creating a humane society. This is an
age old desire and its roots are found in the ancient Indian Civilization
- both in vedic literature as well as in the prophecies of Buddha and his
contemporaries. There may be differences in the approach towards
analysing the concept of humaneness in the society, but the basic
protection of the human qualities remains common denominator in all
such analyses. In the contemporary world it is known as human rights.
Human rights are those rights which are considered to be absolutely
essential for the survival and personality development of all human
beings.
Through the course of its development, human society
has stratified itself into various sections, sectors and levels. They may
be differentiated on the basis of caste, colour, spatial origin, sex,
occupation and of physical strength. Development of a proper and
egalitarian humane society, despite differences is what human rights
aim at achieving. These basic rights, which when denied to human
beings create immense sufferings for the individuals, and tensions in
the society. Being the basis of any humane society, they have also
been referred to as ‘Fundamental Rights’, ‘Basic Rights’, ‘Natural
Rights’ and above all 'Human Rights’.
The concept of 'human rights’ is necessarily evolving in
nature apace with the evoluation of human civilization in the context of
155
a charging social, political, economic and cultural milieu. It is the
product of a given social order. The idea of inalienable rights of human
being is, however, much older and has found expression in the writings
of poets, philosophers and politicians in antiquity and in the middle
ages.
Since the days of the Indus Valley civilization down to this
day, the Indian Culture has been the product of synthesis of diverse
cultures and religions that came into contact with the enormous Indian
sub-continent over time.
When resistance to religious intolerance and politico-
economic bondage began, the transition to liberal notion of freedom
and equality, particularly in relation to the use and ownership of
property, the foundations of what today are called ‘Human Rights’ were
laid.
The origin and development of human rights has been on
two bases, the first is the national and second is the international.
The roots for the protection of the rights of man may be
traced as far back as in the Babylonian Laws. Assyrian Laws, Hittiti
Laws and in the Dharm of the Vedic period in India. Writings of Plato
and other Greek and Roman Philosophers also depict for the protection
of human rights though they had a religious foundation. The City-State
of Greece gave equal freedom of speech, equality before law, right to
vote, right to be elected to public office, right to trade and the right of
156
access to justice to their citizens. Similar rights were secured to the
Romans by the Jus civile of the Roman Law.
The Magna Carta granted by King John of England to the
English baron on June 15, 1215 ensured feudal rights and dues and to
guarantee that the King would not encroach upon their privileges.
The Carta implies that there were laws protecting the
rights of subjects and communities which the King is, bound to observe
and if he fails to do so, be compelled to observe by force. Thus the
Carta set fortn the principle that the power of the King was not
absolute.
The Magna Carta’s importance lies on the interpretations
of the principles by the succeeding generations. In 1216-17, during the
reign of John's son, Henry III, the Magna Carta was confirmed by
Parliament, and in 1297 Edward I confirmed it in a modified from. The
Carta was buttressed in 1628 by the Petition of Rights, and in 1689, by
the Bill of Rights, to form the platform for Parliamentary superiority over
the Crown and to give documentary authority for the rule of laws in
England.
The expression fundamental rights of man find in the
declarations and constitutional instruments of many States. For
instance, the Declaration of independence of the Thirteen United
States of America in 1776. The Virginia Bill of Rights, 1776, the
Constitution of the United States of 1787 with amendments in 1789,
1865,1869 and 1919 included rights of man.
157
The French Declaration of the Rights of man of 1789 led
other European countries to include the provisions in their laws for the
protection of human rights. Since the beginning of the nineteenth
century it was recognized by most of the states that human beings
possess certain rights. Worth of the human personality began to be
realised.
INTERNATIONAL DECLARATIONS AND CONVENTIONS ON
HUMAN RIGHTS:
The present day human rights movement is the result of
the experiences of the World War II. During the war, shocking crimes
were committed against the humanity and there was total suppression
of fundamental rights.
Nazi leaders of Germany had established a regime of
complete lawlessness and tyranny. They had barbarously negated
human values and dignity within their territories under their occupation.
It was at that time realized that the restoration of the freedoms and
rights to the people is one of the essential conditions for the
establishment of international peace and security. This conviction was
reflected in the proclamation.
Issued by the President Franklin D. Roosevelt on January
6, 1941 which came to be known as ‘Four Freedoms’. These he listed
as freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom from want and
freedom from fear. In the message he declared: ‘Freedom means the
158
supremacy of human rights everywhere, our support goes to those who
struggle to gain these rights or keep them'.
The efforts for the creation of an international
organisation, in order to establish peace, were being made even when
the World War II was in progress. A number of conferences and
meetings were held before the United Nations, an international
organization, was established in 1945. Many Declarations adopted by
the Conferences laid down the importance of human rights. The Joint
Declaration issued by the President Franklin D. Roosevelt of the United
States and the Prime Minister Winston Churchill of the United Kingdom
on August 14, 1941 in a document known as the Atlantic Charter,
cherished the hope for a peace which will afford assurance that all the
men in all the lands may live out their lives in freedom from fear and
want.
The Declaration of the United Nations signed on January
1, 1947 at Washington confirmed the principles of the Atlantic Charter
when it proclaimed that the protection of human rights in all countries
was to be one of the results which was desired to be obtained from the
victory over the Axis. Dumbarton Oaks proposals contained only a
brief reference to the promotion of human rights as one of the activities
to be performed by the proposed General Assembly, and under its
authority, the Economic and Social Council.
The first documentary use of the expression of human
rights took place in UDHR and two other international covenants -
159
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
(ICESCR) of 1966 which came into force in 1976 with the consent and
approval of the United Nations.
Human Rights Historical Development underscores
empirical realities of man’s struggle for rights being as old as history of
mankind itself. Universal Declaration of Human Rights adopted on 10th
December, 1948, has become the cornerstone of all activities deployed
at the international, regional and national levels to give substance to
the common ideal of humanity i.e., to protect every human being and
all the rights of all human beings.
In every age liberty, nothing else than a set of essential
rights, has been the most prized possession of man. It is a different
matter that it remained like a privilege of a very small section of the
people until the advent of democracy in the real sense of the term.
They struggled against anti libertarian forces and never allowed their
rulers to turn the clock back. Hence, came the title of human rights.
Moreover, as the civilized way of life grew, these rights became
available to more and more members of the society so much so that
liberty and equality became complementary terms. Thus a French
historian Alexis de Tocqueville could well aphorise: “there is nothing
which, generally speaking elevates and sustains the human spirit more
than and the idea of rights. There is something great and virile in the
idea of right which removes from any request its supplicant character,
160
and places the one who claims it on the same level as the one who
grants if.
In this direction, Britain occupies the first and foremost
place where the greater charter of liberties, called Magna Carta, came
into being as early as in 1215 after getting the assent of King John.
The Magna Carta is the first document of its kind in the history of
human rights and liberties. It is true that it secured feudal, the charter
was a turning point in the history of England. The American colonists
raised the banner of revolt and declared their independence on July 4,
1776. The American Declaration of Independence is an epoch-making
document. The French Declaration of the Rights of man and citizen
adopted by the National Assembly on August 26,1789.
On the whole, a study of the important charters and
declarations of the three great countries of the world leaves one strong
and indelible impression on our mind that they set the foundation and
the peace of the progress of human civilization in a particular direction.
Since human rights cover people all over the world irrespective of their
social, cultural, racial ethnic, religious and communal differences, it is
natural that they have become a matter of international concern in the
present century.
HUMAN RIGHTS AND INDIA
The preamble of our Constitution affirms our belief in the
dignity of individual and integrity of the Nation. The rights of human
beings have a central place in our efforts to build a polity sustained by
161
law. Our constitution guarantees fundamental rights to all citizens right
to equality and freedom, right to exploitation, freedom of religion,
cultural and educational rights and right to constitutional remedies.
The observance of these rights can strengthen our democracy - the
part and parcel of human rights.
Progress we define not by wealth of the elite but by the
welfare of the masses. We, Indians, always nurture a vision of humane
society. ‘Freedom brings its own responsibilities and burden', said
Jawahar lal Nehru. ‘And they can be shouldered only in the spirit of a
free people, self-disciplined and determined to preserve and enlarge
freedom’.
The Constitution of the Republic of India, which came into
force on 26th January, 1950 is an eloquent testimony of the nation’s
deep commitment to human rights. The Preamble to the Constitution
pledges to secure to all the citizens of India.
The establishment of a democratic and secular political
system and the reconstruction and modernizing of society and the
principles of egalitarian and respect for India’s cultural diversity were
central to the vision of Independence struggle. In 1931, the Indian
National Congress adopted a resolution on Fundamental Rights and
Economic Programme. This resolution expressed solidarity with anti
colonial struggles and movements of social progress and democracy in
other countries and with the victims of fascist agrarian.
162
In recent years, however the question of human rights
has assumed global significance, particularly after the end of the cold
war and thereby democratization of world order. A genuine concern is
witnessed in favour of the enforcement of human rights norms, and
also the establishment of various governmental and non-governmental
agencies for the promotion and protection of such norms. In fact,
prescription of human rights norms find expression when it is enforced
by an independent, competent and impartial authority, though
upholding and promoting human rights is a responsibility and of every
individual, every group, every institution and every organ in the society,
the practical task of protection and promotion of human rights is
primarily a national one because state is known as the sole guardian,
guaranteer and protector of human rights. Towards this end every
country has its proper institutions supervising the relation between
individuals and the authority.
In recent years many countries have established national
institutions with the sole purpose of protecting and promoting human
rights; the specific tasks of such institutions may vary considerably
form country to country but they share a common purpose, and for this
reason they are referred to collectively as ‘National institutions for the
promotion and protection of human rights’. These institutions have a
very unique role in translating international human rights standards as
mentioned in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other
international treaties on human rights and giving them an indigenous
163
flavour and acceptability without diluting their essential universal
characteristics.
India is bestowed with all principles and institutions of
democratic governance and is also a signatory to the UDHR and other
international covenants on human rights, which fortify India’s
commitment to and respect for human rights. Recently, it has taken a
significant initiative for the protection and promotion of human rights by
enacting the protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, which gives a
concrete shape to the Naiigpal Human Rights Commission. The Indian
Government has constituted a National Human Rights Commission,
under the Chairmanship of Mr. Justice Ranganath Misra. This is a
welcome step to prevent the infringement of human rights by an
authority, including government. The Commission has the power to
inquire suo-motu or op^^^implaint of human rights violation or
abetment and negligence in prevention of such violation by a public
servant. India is a vast country, the Commission at the district level or
State level should work under the supervision of the National Human
Rights Commission.
The National Human Rights Commission is playing a
significant role in creating mass-awareness and building mass-opinion
against the human rights violations in India. National Human Rights
Commission which sets a hallmark in the Indian civil liberties
movement was not a sudden development, rather than its necessity
was felt on various grounds. Let us hope that the divine gift of an
innocent smile may be restored to every human face.
164