Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
150 views21 pages

EC Drive - EC Plus

This document provides input parameters and load combinations for the design of a substructure foundation to support a fixed roof storage tank with a 35 meter diameter. Key parameters include: soil type and properties, concrete properties, tank dimensions and loads, wind and seismic loads, and serviceability and ultimate load combinations. The document contains detailed information needed to manually calculate and verify the substructure design to support the storage tank.

Uploaded by

Mohammed Farhan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
150 views21 pages

EC Drive - EC Plus

This document provides input parameters and load combinations for the design of a substructure foundation to support a fixed roof storage tank with a 35 meter diameter. Key parameters include: soil type and properties, concrete properties, tank dimensions and loads, wind and seismic loads, and serviceability and ultimate load combinations. The document contains detailed information needed to manually calculate and verify the substructure design to support the storage tank.

Uploaded by

Mohammed Farhan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 21

MANUAL CALCULATION

ECTANK
& VERIFICATION
Storage Tank FOR SUBSTRUCTURE
Foundation Design Job :DESIGN OF
GLS TANK-35M DIA-SUBSTRUCTURE DESIGN
GLS TANK(35M DIA).
Licensed to: Mohammed Farhan Powered By:
www.ecplusdesign.com

1.0   INPUT

(Design Codes: API


650/ASCE/SBC/ACI)
1.1 Design Options
Tank No  Enter
GFTSTank No
TANK
Foundation Type  Soil Supported
MODEL-11530
Tank Type  API 650
Design Standard  American Standard
Unit  SI Unit

1.2 Tank Data


Roof Type  Fixed (Non Frangible)
Tank Inner Diameter Di =  35000 mm
Shell Height Ht =  11500 mm
Roof Height Hr =  2000 mm
Corrosion Allowance Caf =  0 %

1.2.1 Internal Pressure (REFER TO TABLE 1.10.3 FOR VENDOR PROVIDED


LOADS FROM TANK.)
Design Pressure Gdesign =  0 kN/m²
Operating Pressure Goper =  0 kN/m²
Test Pressure Gtest =  0 kN/m²
External (Vacuum) Pressure Gexternal=  0 kN/m²
Failure Pressure Gfailure =  0 kN/m²

1.3 Foundation Data


Depth of Foundation Df =  400 mm
Height of Ring Beam above Ground Hag =  200 mm
Width of Ring Beam Ww =  350 mm
Width in Contact with Fluid Wwf =  50 mm

1.4   Grade Slab


Grade Slab  Monolithic
Thickness Tg =  300 mm

1.5 Rebars and Anchor Bolt

1.5.1 Reinforcement

Clear Cover for Ring Beam Crb =  75 mm


Clear Cover for Grade Slab Cgs =  50 mm
 
Ring Beam Reinforcement

 
Grade Slab Reinforcement

(Even only Ring beam can be provided & River Sand is recommended
instead of Grade slab as per Standards By some Tank Vendors.;
However considering loose soil base & soil improvement done, its
econimical to provide Concrete Grade Slab instead of River sand.

1.6 Soil
Allowable Increase of SBC for Test SBCt =  0 %
Allowable Increase of SBC for Wind SBCw =  0 %
Allowable Increase of SBC for Seismic SBCs =  0 %
Allowable Safe Bearing Pressure SBC =  140 kN/m² (As per Geotechnical Report-
Page 3/97)
Unit Weight of Soil γsoil =  18 kN/m³
Angle of Internal Friction Φ =  30 deg
Pressure Coefficient Type K =  Active (ka)
Co-efficient of Friction μ =  0.4
Poisson's Ratio ν =  0.35
Soil Elasticity Modulus Eso =  2500 kN/m² (Assumed Value required only for Settlement
calculation.
However Plate Load test shall be perfomed at
Site for actual
settlement check after compaction to finish
grade.
Hard Stratum Depth for Settlement Hsd =  2000 mm
Allowable Differential Settlement δallow =  25 mm
Ground Water Depth Hwt =  0 mm
Density of Ground Water γw =  9.81 kN/m³

1.7 Reinforced Concrete Properties


Concrete Type =  Normal Weight
Density of Steel γsteel =  78.5 kN/m³
Density of Concrete γconc =  24 kN/m³
Compressive Strength of Concrete f'c =  40 N/mm² (Cylindrical
Yield Strength of Reinforcement fy =  520 N/mm² Strength)
(Welded Wire
Fabric)
Concrete Modification Factor λ =  1
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel Es =  200 kN/mm²

1.8 Stability Safety Factor


Factor of Safety against Sliding γSlide =  1.5
Factor of Safety against Overturning γOver =  1.5
Factor of Safety against Uplift γUp =  1.2

1.9   Load Cases


Notation Description
Ds Dead Loads
De Empty Weight
Do Operating Weight
Dt Test Weight
L Live Load
S Snow Load
W Wind Load
Eo Seismic Load
Gdesign Design Internal Pressure
Goper Operating Internal Pressure
Gtest Test Internal Pressure
Gexternal External Pressure
Gfailure Failure Pressure

1.10 Loads Data

1.10.1 Wind Load by Program

Code  ASCE-7 2005 (Equivalent to


Effective Diameter Factor Deff =  1 SBC-301-2006)

Effective Height Factor Heff =  1


Basic Wind Speed V =  40 m/sec (145 Kmph applicable for Dammam region as per
Terrain Exposure Category Terrain =  C SAES-A-112)
Importance Category Category =  2 (Risk Category-2 as no hazardious or threat for
Topography Condition Topography= Human Health)
 Flat
1.10.2 Seismic Load by Program

Vertical Seismic Effect  Yes


Code  API 650 2013
Seismic Group  I
Site Class  D (Normally applicable for
Anchorage DAMMAM region.)
 Mechanical
Spectral Acceleration 0.2 Sec Ss =  0.08 (As per Soil Report-Page
30/97.)
Spectral Acceleration 1 Sec S1 =  0.03 (As per Soil Report-Page 30/97.)
Long Period Transition TL =  12 sec

1.10.3   Tank Loads (As per Vendor provided Catalogue; Note- Wind & Seismic are recalculated as Vendor provided
Wind/Seismic Loads are not correct.)
Shear at Tank Base Moment at Tank Base
Description Axial Load (kN)
(kN) (kN.m)
Empty Weight (De) 420.0
Tank Bottom Plate Weight (Dbp) 0.0
Floating Roof Weight (Drs) 96.2
Operating Weight (Do) 75953.0
Test Weight (Dt) 75953.0
Live Load (L) 577.0
Snow Load (S) 0.0

1.11 Load Combination

1.11.1   Serviceability Load Combinations

No Combination
SLS1 Ds + Do + Gdesign
SLS2 Ds + Dt + Gtest
SLS3 Ds + De + WL + 0.4Gdesign
SLS4 Ds + De + WL + Goper
SLS5 Ds + Do + WL + 0.4Gdesign
SLS6 Ds + Do + WL + Goper
SLS7 Ds + De + WL + 0.4Gexternal
SLS8 Ds + Do + WL + 0.4Gexternal
SLS9 Ds + Do + L + 0.4Gexternal
SLS10 Ds + Do + 0.4Gexternal
SLS11 Ds + De + 0.4L + Gexternal
SLS12 Ds + De + Gexternal
SLS13 Ds + Do + 0.4L + Gexternal
SLS14 Ds + Do + Gexternal
SLS15 Ds + Do + Eo + 0.4Gdesign
SLS16 Ds + Do + Eo + Goper

1.11.2   Ultimate Load Combinations


No Combination
1.11.2   Ultimate Load Combinations

No Combination
ULS1 1.4Ds + 1.4Do + 1.4Gdesign
ULS2 1.4Ds + 1.4Dt + 1.4Gtest
ULS3 0.9Ds + 0.9De + 1.6WL + 0.4Gdesign
ULS4 1.2Ds + 1.2De + 1.6WL + 0.5Gdesign
ULS5 0.9Ds + 0.9De + 1.6WL + 0.9Goper
ULS6 1.2Ds + 1.2De + 1.6WL + 1.2Goper
ULS7 0.9Ds + 0.9Do + 1.6WL + 0.4Gdesign
ULS8 1.2Ds + 1.2Do + 1.6WL + 0.5Gdesign
ULS9 0.9Ds + 0.9Do + 1.6WL + 0.9Goper
ULS10 1.2Ds + 1.2Do + 1.6WL + 1.2Goper
ULS11 0.9Ds + 0.9De + 1.6WL + 0.4Gexternal
ULS12 1.2Ds + 1.2De + 1.6WL + 0.5Gexternal
ULS13 0.9Ds + 0.9Do + 1.6WL + 0.4Gexternal
ULS14 1.2Ds + 1.2Do + 1.6WL + 0.5Gexternal
ULS15 0.9Ds + 0.9Do + 0.8WL + 0.4Gexternal
ULS16 1.2Ds + 1.2Do + 1.6L + 0.8WL + 0.5Gexternal
ULS17 1.2Ds + 1.2Do + 0.8WL + 0.5Gexternal
ULS18 0.9Ds + 0.9De + 1.6WL + 0.9Gexternal
ULS19 1.2Ds + 1.2De + 0.6L + 1.6WL + 1.2Gexternal
ULS20 1.2Ds + 1.2De + 1.6WL + 1.2Gexternal
ULS21 0.9Ds + 0.9Do + 1.4Eo + 0.4Gdesign
ULS22 1.2Ds + 1.2Do + 1.4Eo + 0.5Gdesign
ULS23 0.9Ds + 0.9Do + 1.4Eo + 0.9Goper
ULS24 1.2Ds + 1.2Do + 1.4Eo + 1.2Goper

1.11.3 Additional Load Combinations

Change in Empty/Operating/Test Wt.  0 %

2.0   OUTPUT

2.1   Geometry of Tank Foundation

Inner Diameter of Ring Beam Dir = Di − 2 * Wwf 34.9 m

Outer Diameter of Ring Beam Dor = Dir + 2 * Ww 35.6 m

Overall Depth of Ring Beam Hrb = Df + Hag 0.6 m

2.2   Properties of Tank Foundation


Ar = π
2 2
4 * (Dor − Dir ) 38.8 m²
Base Area of Ring Beam

π * Dir2 956.6 m²
Area of Grade Slab Surface Ags =
4
2
π * Dir 956.6 m²
Surface Area of Soil Enclosed by Ring Beam Asr =
4

π * (Dor4 − Dir4)
Section Modulus of Ring Beam Sr = 338.2 m³
32 * Dor

2.3   Load Calculation


[Tank Loads provided by the User / Vendor]
2
π * Di 962.1 m²
Cross Section Area of Tank At =
4

Di
√ ( D2 )
2
Surface Area of Roof Aro = π * * i + Hr2 968.4 m²
2

Self-Weight of Ring Beam Wrb = Ar * Hrb * γconc 558.1 kN

Self-Weight of Grade Slab Wgs = Ags * Tg * γconc 6887.7 kN

Weight of Soil Interior to Foundation Wsf = Asr * Hrb * γsoil 6577.7 kN

Self-Weight of Shell Wsp = We − Dbp 420 kN

At − Asr
% of Tank Content Load to Ring Beam Rw = * 100 0.6 %
At

Tank Base Plate Load to Ring Beam Wtr = Dbp * Rw 0 kN

Remaining Tank Base Plate Load Dbpf = Dbp − Wtr 0 kN

Floating Roof Load to Ring Beam Wrr = Drs * Rw 0.5 kN

Design Floating Roof Load Df r = Wrr 0.5 kN

Remaining Floating Roof Load Drsf = Drs − Df r 95.7 kN

Design Live Load DLl = L 577 kN

Shell Knife Edge Load Wsk = We − Dbp 323.8 kN

Empty Weight to Ring Beam Wet = Wsk + Wtr 323.8 kN

Operating Content Load to Ring Beam Wot = (Do − De) * Rw 431 kN

Remaining Operating Content Weight Wotf = Do − De − Wot 75102 kN

Testing Content Load to Ring Beam Wtt = (Dt − De) * Rw 431 kN


Remaining Test Content Weight Wttf = Dt − De − Wtt 75102 kN

2.4   Buoyancy Load


Buoyancy Load -152.1 kN
 

2.5   Wind Load Calculation - Program (ASCE-7 2005)

Effective Height Hew = Hef f * Ht 11.5 m

Effective Diameter Dew = Def f * Di 35 m

Importance Factor I 1 Table 6-1

Wind Directionality Factor Kd 0.95 Table 6-4

Topographic Factor Kzt 1

Velocity pressure Exposure Coefficient Kz 1.03 Cl. 6.5.6.6

2
Wind Pressure qz = 0.613 * Kz * Kzt * Ke * Kd * V 960.48 N/m2 Cl. 6.5.10

Wind Uplift Pressure qu = 1.44 * qz 1.38 kN/m2

Wind Uplift Load Wu = qu * At 1330.69 kN

Wind Shear Vw = 0.86 * Dew * Hew * qz 332.47 kN

Hew
Wind Moment Mw = Vw * 1911.7 kN.m
2
(VENDOR PROVIDED WIND REACTIONS WERE 201 KN & 847 KNM
  FOR WIND SPEED OF 106 KMPH. HOWEVER ABOVE HIGHLIGHTED
VALUES SHALL BE USED WHICH ARE ATTAINED CONSIDERING
2.6   Seismic Load Calculation - Program (API 650 2013) WIND SPEED OF 145 KMPH FOR DAMMAM REGION.

Seimic Load Reference API 650 2013

Product Height H 11500 mm

Product Weight Wp = Do − De 75533 kN

Seismic Importance Factor I 1

2.6.1   Site Coefficients

Fa 1.6 Table E1

Fv 2.4 Table E2
Spectral Response Accln. Parameter at 0.2 sec SDs = 2 * Fa * Ss 0.1
3

Spectral Response Accln. Parameter at 1 sec SD1 = 2


3 * Fv * S1 0

2.6.2   Impulsive Components

Response Modification Factor Rwi 4 Table E4

Acceleration Parameter Ai = max( S * RI , 0.007 )


Ds
wi
0.02 E4.6.1-1

tanh ( 0.866 * )
D i
Effective Weight of Product W = H *W 28365.26 kN E6.1.1-1
i Di p
0.866 *
H

Shear Component Vi = Ai * (Wsp + Dbp + Wi) 614.09 kN E6.1-2

Center of Action for Ringwall Overturning Moment Xi = 0.375 * H 4.31 m E6.1.2.1-1


Center of Action for Base Overturning Moment

( ( ))
Di
0.866 *
H 13.87 m E6.1.2.2-1
( )
Xis = 0.375 * 1 + 1.333 * D −1 *H
tanh 0.866 * i
H

2.6.3   Convective Components

Response Modification Factor Rwc 2 Table E4

1.8 * 0.578 * √Di


Tc =
Sloshing Period
√ tanh 3.68 (
Di
*H
) 6.73 sec E4.5.2-a

Acceleration Parameter Ac = 1.5 * SD1 * T1 * RI 0.01 E4.6.1-4


c wc

Effective Weight of Product Wc = 0.23 *


Di
H
* tanh ( 3.67D * H ) * D
i
o
44171.9 kN E6.1.1-3

Shear Component Vc = Ac * Wc 236.28 kN E6.1-3


Center of Action for Ringwall Overturning Moment

( ( )
) )
cosh 3.67 *H −1
Di 6.36 m E61.2.1-3
(
Xc = 1− *H
3.67 * H * sinh 3.67 * H
Di Di

Center of Action for Baswe Overturning Moment

( ( )
) )
cosh 3.67 * H − 1.937
Di 12.24 m E61.2.2-3
(
Xcs = 1− *H
3.67 * H * sinh 3.67 * H
Di Di
2.6.4   Design Seismic Forces

Seismic Shear Vs = √ 2
(Vi) + (Vc)
2
658 kN E6.1-1

Seismic Ring Wall Moment

√ (A * (W *X +W ))
2
Mrw = Ht 3055.9 kN.m E6.1.5-1
* + (Ac * Wc * Xc)2
i i i sp 2
Seismic Base Moment

√ (A * (W *X +W ))
2
Ms = Ht 2 8926.8 kN.m E6.1.5-2
* + (Ac * Wc * Xcs)
i i is sp 2

Vertical Seismic Coefficient Av = 2 * 0.7 * SDs 0.04 EC6.1.3


3
 

2.7   Loads on Foundation


On Top of Foundation
Sl.No Load Case Moment
Axial (kN) Shear (kN)
(kN.m)
1 Dc - Dead (Self) Weight of Concrete = Wrb 558.1 6887.7 *
2 Ds - Dead (Self) Weight of Soil 0.0 6577.7 *
3 BL - Buoyancy Load = BL -152.1
4 De - Dead (Empty / Self) Weight of Tank = Wet 323.8 0.0 *
5 Drs - Floating Roof Weight 0.5 95.7 *
6 Do - Equipment Operating Content Weight = Wot 431.0 75102.0 *
7 Dt - Equipment Test Content Weight = Wtt 431.0 75102.0 *
8 L - Live Load 577.0
9 S - Snow Load 0.0
10 WL - Wind Load 1330.7 332.5 1911.7
11 Eo - Seismic Load Ring Beam Component 658.0 3055.9
12 Eo - Seismic Load Slab Component 8926.8
Note * : The loads acting interior to the footing is considered only for Resisting Force Calculation in Sliding Check

2.8   Service Loads on Foundation


Total Vertical Load (max)
Total Vertical Load (min)
Total Shear Total Moment

SLS Comb
(kN) (kN) (kN) (kN.m)
SLS1 1313.5 1161.4 0.0 0.0
SLS2 1313.5 1161.4 0.0 0.0
SLS3 882.5 730.4 332.5 2111.2
SLS4 882.5 730.4 332.5 2111.2
SLS5 1313.5 1161.4 332.5 2111.2
SLS6 1313.5 1161.4 332.5 2111.2
SLS7 882.5 730.4 332.5 2111.2
SLS8 1313.5 1161.4 332.5 2111.2
Total Vertical Load (max)
Total Vertical Load (min)
Total Shear Total Moment

SLS Comb
(kN) (kN) (kN) (kN.m)
SLS9 1890.5 1738.4 0.0 0.0
SLS10 1313.5 1161.4 0.0 0.0
SLS11 1113.3 961.2 0.0 0.0
SLS12 882.5 730.4 0.0 0.0
SLS13 1544.3 1392.2 0.0 0.0
SLS14 1313.5 1161.4 0.0 0.0
SLS15 1325.5 1149.4 658.0 3450.7
SLS16 1325.5 1149.4 658.0 3450.7
Note : Total Vertical Load (max) - Considers downward vertical seismic effect.
           Total Vertical Load (min) - considers upward vertical seismic effect, buoyancy and corrosion reduction.
 

2.9   Stability Checks

2.9.1   Uplift Check

Downward Force (kN)

Sl.No Upward Force (kN) FOS Status


Vertical Load
SLS1 1313.5 152.1 8.64 OK
SLS2 1313.5 152.1 8.64 OK
SLS3 882.5 152.1 5.80 OK
SLS4 882.5 152.1 5.80 OK
SLS5 1313.5 152.1 8.64 OK
SLS6 1313.5 152.1 8.64 OK
SLS7 882.5 152.1 5.80 OK
SLS8 1313.5 152.1 8.64 OK
SLS9 1890.5 152.1 12.43 OK
SLS10 1313.5 152.1 8.64 OK
SLS11 1113.3 152.1 7.32 OK
SLS12 882.5 152.1 5.80 OK
SLS13 1544.3 152.1 10.15 OK
SLS14 1313.5 152.1 8.64 OK
SLS15 1301.5 152.1 8.56 OK
SLS16 1301.5 152.1 8.56 OK
Note : Vertical loads are Reduced by 0.4 * vertical seismic coefficient Av for applicable load combinations.

2.9.2   Critical Combinations - Failure Case

No Combination
CLC1 Ds + De + WL + 1.5Gdesign
CLC2 Ds + De + 1.25Gtest
CLC3 Ds + Do + 1.5Gfailure
Note 1: Uplift Combinations are as generated as per API 650 2013 - F.8.2 with corroded empty factor for CLC1
2.9.3   Frictional Resistance Forces for Critical Combinations

Beneficial Frictional Resistance as per API 650 2013 F.8.2


Active Earth Pressure Coefficient k = 1 − Sin(Φ) 0.33
1 + Sin(Φ)
2
Force due to Inside Soil Pressure Fisoil = 0.5 * k * γsoil * Hrb * π * Dir 29.6 kN

2
Force due to Outside Soil Pressure Fosoil = 0.5 * k * γsoil * (Df ) * π * Dor 53.68 kN

Drs − Wf r
Force due to Floating Roof Froof = k * * Hrb * π * Dir 2.19 kN
Asr

Dbp − Wtr
Force due to Base Plate Fbp = k * * Hrb * π * Dir 0 kN
Asr

(Do − De) * k * γsoil * Hrb


Force due to Operating Liquid Pressure Foc = * π * Dir 1721.54 kN
At

k * Wgs * (Hrb − Tg)


Force due to Grade Slab Pressure Fgs = * π * Dir 78.94 kN
Asr

2.9.4   Uplift Check - Critical Combination

Downward Force (kN)

Sl.No Upward Force (kN) FOS Status


Vertical Load + ∑(Frictional Resis.)
CLC1 882.5 152.1 5.80 OK
CLC2 882.5 152.1 5.80 OK
CLC3 2084.1 152.1 13.70 OK
 

2.9.5   Check for Sliding

Resisting Force (kN)


Sliding Force (kN)

Sl.No FOS Status


Vertical Load * μ ( Hor. Shear Force )
SLS1 35929.8 0.0 100.00 OK
SLS2 35929.8 0.0 100.00 OK
SLS3 5716.6 332.5 17.19 OK
SLS4 5716.6 332.5 17.19 OK
SLS5 35929.8 332.5 108.07 OK
SLS6 35929.8 332.5 108.07 OK
SLS7 5716.6 332.5 17.19 OK
SLS8 35929.8 332.5 108.07 OK
SLS9 36160.6 0.0 100.00 OK
SLS10 35929.8 0.0 100.00 OK
SLS11 5808.9 0.0 100.00 OK
SLS12 5716.6 0.0 100.00 OK
SLS13 36022.1 0.0 100.00 OK
SLS14 35929.8 0.0 100.00 OK
SLS15 35445.8 658.0 53.87 OK
SLS16 35445.8 658.0 53.87 OK
Note : Vertical loads are Reduced by 0.4 * vertical seismic coefficient Av for applicable load combinations.
 

2.9.6   Check for Overturning

Distance from Center to Edge of Ring Beam Br 17.8 m

Sl.No Resisting Moment (kN.m)


Overturning Moment FOS Status
( Vertical Load * Br ) (kN.m)

( Hor. Moments )
SLS1 20672.8 0.0 100.00 OK
SLS2 20672.8 0.0 100.00 OK
SLS3 13001.0 2111.2 6.16 OK
SLS4 13001.0 2111.2 6.16 OK
SLS5 20672.8 2111.2 9.79 OK
SLS6 20672.8 2111.2 9.79 OK
SLS7 13001.0 2111.2 6.16 OK
SLS8 20672.8 2111.2 9.79 OK
SLS9 30943.4 0.0 100.00 OK
SLS10 20672.8 0.0 100.00 OK
SLS11 17109.2 0.0 100.00 OK
SLS12 13001.0 0.0 100.00 OK
SLS13 24781.0 0.0 100.00 OK
SLS14 20672.8 0.0 100.00 OK
SLS15 20458.6 3450.7 5.93 OK
SLS16 20458.6 3450.7 5.93 OK
Note : Vertical loads are Reduced by 0.4 * vertical seismic coefficient Av for applicable load combinations.
 

2.9.7   Check for Bearing Pressure

Max. Base Min. Base


Base Pressure
Base Pressure Pressure Under Pressure Under Allowable Base
Under Tank at
Sl.No Under Tank Ring Beam / Ring Beam / Contact % Pressure Status
Fdn. Level
(kN/m²) Footing Footing (kN/m²)
(kN/m²)
(kN/m²) (kN/m²)
SLS1 85.81 91.21 33.89 29.96 100.00 147.20 OK
SLS2 85.81 91.21 33.89 29.96 100.00 147.20 OK
SLS3 7.30 12.70 29.01 12.60 100.00 147.20 OK
SLS4 7.30 12.70 29.01 12.60 100.00 147.20 OK
SLS5 85.81 91.21 40.13 23.72 100.00 147.20 OK
SLS6 85.81 91.21 40.13 23.72 100.00 147.20 OK
SLS7 7.30 12.70 29.01 12.60 100.00 147.20 OK
SLS8 85.81 91.21 40.13 23.72 100.00 147.20 OK
SLS9 85.81 91.21 48.78 44.85 100.00 147.20 OK
SLS10 85.81 91.21 33.89 29.96 100.00 147.20 OK
SLS11 7.30 12.70 28.72 24.80 100.00 147.20 OK
SLS12 7.30 12.70 22.77 18.84 100.00 147.20 OK
SLS13 85.81 91.21 39.84 35.92 100.00 147.20 OK
SLS14 85.81 91.21 33.89 29.96 100.00 147.20 OK
SLS15 87.93 93.33 44.40 19.45 100.00 147.20 OK
SLS16 87.93 93.33 44.40 19.45 100.00 147.20 OK
Note 1 : NA is displayed for Uniform Pressure distribution where Maximum and Minimum Bearing Pressure are same.
Note : Vertical loads are Increased / Reduced by 0.4 * vertical seismic coefficient Av for applicable load combinations based on critical
case.
 

2.10   Immediate Settlement Calculation Ref: Foundation Analysis and Design - Bowles

Note : Circular Foundation is converted into Equivalent Square Dimension

Hard Stratum Depth H = Hsd 2000 m

Foundation Depth D = Df 400 m

2.10.1   Under Tank Near Footing

Foundation Breadth Bc = √ π * Di * Di
4
31 m

Foundation Length Lc = √ π * Di * Di
4
31 m

Lc
Length by Breadth Ratio
Bc 1

NOTE: SETTLEMENT CALCULATION SHOWN IS ONLY


BASED ON THEOROTICAL ASSUMPTIONS AS PER "BOWLES
THEORY". HOWEVER PLATE
LOAD TEST SHALL BE PERFORMED TO EVALUATE ACTUAL
D
Depth by Breadth Ratio Bc 0

Influence Factor If c 0.794

B′ = Bc 31 m

L′ = Lc 31 m

Ratio 1 M = L′ 1
B′
Ratio 2 H
N = B′ 0.1

I1 = 1 *
π ( ( ((
M* ln 1 + √ M2 + 1 ) * √ M2 + N2
M * ( 1 + √ M2 + N2 + 1 ) )) (( + ln M + √ M2 + 1 ) * √ 1 + N2
M + ( √ M2 + N2 + 1 ) )) 0.001

I2 = 2 N
* π * tan
−1
( N * √ MM+ N + 1 )
2 2
0.015

Influence Factor 2 Is = I1 + 1 1−−2 μ


*μ *I
2
0.008

No of Corners for Edge m 1

Max. Bearing Pressure Under Tank Mbpc

2
Settlement near Footing δhc = Mbpc * B′ * 1 − μ * m * Is * If c
Eso

2.10.2   Under Footing

π * Di
Length by Breadth Ratio
Ww 314.2

D
Depth by Breadth Ratio Ww 1.1

Influence Factor If e 0.782

Ww
B′′ = 0.2 m
2
π * Di
L′′ = 55 m
2
Ratio 3 M′′ = L′′ 314.2
B′′
Ratio 4 H
N′′ = B′′ 11.4

I1′′ = 1 *
π ( M′′ * ( ((
ln 1 + √ M′′2 + 1 ) * √ M′′2 + N′′2
M′′ * ( 1 + √ M′′2 + N′′2 + 1 ) )) (( + ln M′′ + √ M′′2 + 1 ) * √ 1 + N′′2
M′′ + ( √ M′′2 + N′′2 + 1 ) ))
    0.777
I2′′ = 2N′′
* π * tan − 1 ( N′′ * √ M′′M′′+ N′′ + 1 )
2 2
0.159

Influence Factor 3 Is′′ = I1′′ + ( 1 1−−2 μ* μ ) * I ′′ 2


0.85

No of Corners m′′ 4

Max. Bearing Pressure under Footing Mbpe

2
Settlement under Footing δhe = Mbpe * B′′ * 1 − μ * m′′ * Is′′ * If e
Eso

Differential Settlement δh = δhc − δhe

Sl No. δhc (mm) δhe (mm) δh (mm) δhallow (mm) Status


SLS1 5.9 5.5 0.4 25.0 Safe
SLS2 5.9 5.5 0.4 25.0 Safe
SLS9 5.9 8.0 2.1 25.0 Safe
SLS10 5.9 5.5 0.4 25.0 Safe
SLS11 0.5 4.7 4.2 25.0 Safe
SLS12 0.5 3.7 3.2 25.0 Safe
SLS13 5.9 6.5 0.6 25.0 Safe
SLS14 5.9 5.5 0.4 25.0 Safe
Note : Wind and Seismic Combinations not included.

2.11   Ring Beam Design

2.11.1   Design of Circumferential Reinforcement for Ring Beam

Active Earth Pressure Coefficient k = 1 − Sin(Φ) 0.33


1 + Sin(Φ)
Radial Force due to Soil Pressure Fsoil = 0.5 * k * γsoil * Hrb2 0.27 kN/m

Do − De
Radial Force due to Operating Surcharge Foper = k * * Hrb 15.7 kN/m
At

Dt − De
Radial Force due to Test Surcharge Ftest = k * * Hrb 15.7 kN/m
At

Dbp − Wtr
Radial Force due to Base Plate Fplate = k * * Hrb 0 kN/m
Asr

Drs − Wf r
Radial Force due to Floating Roof Froof = k * * Hrb 0 kN/m
Asr

k * Wgs * (Hrb − Tg)


Radial Force due to Grade Slab Pressure Fgs = 0.72 kN/m
Asr
Fslosh = k * Ms * Hrb
Radial Force due to Sloshing Pressure
π 3 2.1 kN/m
32 * Di

2.11.2   Check for Torsion

Sl No. Torsion Components Vertical Forces Horizontal Forces Eccentricity (m)


(kN/m) (kN/m)
1 Shell Edge Load 2.9 0.1
2 Live Load 5.2 0.1
3 Snow Load 0.0 0.1
4 Base Plate Load on Ring Beam 0.0 0.2
5 Floating Roof Weight on Ring Beam 0.5 0.2
6 Operating Liquid Load on Ring Beam 3.9 0.2
7 Test Liquid Load on Ring Beam 3.9 0.2
8 Design Pressure on Ring Beam 0.0 0.2
9 Operating Pressure on Ring Beam 0.0 0.2
10 Test Pressure on Ring Beam 0.0 0.2
11 External Pressure on Ring Beam 0.0 0.2
12 Self-Weight of Foundation 5.0 0.0
13 Uplift Force - Wind Load -2.0 0.0
14 Uplift Force - Seismic Load -3.1 0.0
15 Uplift Force - Design Internal Pressure 0.0 0.0
16 Uplift Force - Operating Internal Pressure 0.0 0.0
17 Uplift Force - Test Internal Pressure 0.0 0.0
18 Force due to Soil Pressure 0.3 0.1
19 Force due to Surcharge Pressure - Operating Liquid 15.7 0.0
20 Force due to Surcharge Pressure - Test Liquid 15.7 0.0
21 Force due to Design Internal Pressure 0.0 0.0
22 Force due to Operating Internal Pressure 0.0 0.0
23 Force due to Test Internal Pressure 0.0 0.0
24 Force due to External Pressure 0.0 0.0
25 Force due to Base Plate Pressure 0.0 0.0
26 Force due to Floating Roof Pressure 0.0 0.0
27 Force due to Grade Slab Pressure 0.7 0.0
28 Force due to Bearing Pressure * Refer Bearing Pressure Force Table
Note 1 : The Vertical Rectangular Section of Ring Foundation alone is considered for the Torsion and Hoop Tension Resistance
Note 2 : Vertical loads are Increased / Reduced by 0.4 * vertical seismic coefficient Av for applicable load combinations based on
critical case.
 

2.11.3   Bearing Pressure Force Calculation

Sl No. Force due to Bearing Pressure CG of Pressure Force (m)


Eccentricity of Pressure Force (m)

(kN/m)
( Ww / 2 - CG )
(Area of Pressure Component)
ULS1 14.7 0.2 0.0
ULS2 14.7 0.2 0.0
ULS3 2.5 0.2 0.0
ULS4 4.5 0.2 0.0
ULS5 2.5 0.2 0.0
ULS6 4.5 0.2 0.0
ULS7 6.0 0.2 0.0
ULS8 9.1 0.2 0.0
ULS9 6.0 0.2 0.0
ULS10 9.1 0.2 0.0
ULS11 2.5 0.2 0.0
ULS12 4.5 0.2 0.0
ULS13 6.0 0.2 0.0
ULS14 9.1 0.2 0.0
ULS15 7.7 0.2 0.0
ULS16 19.2 0.2 0.0
ULS17 10.9 0.2 0.0
ULS18 2.5 0.2 0.0
ULS19 7.6 0.2 0.0
ULS20 4.5 0.2 0.0
ULS21 4.4 0.2 0.0
ULS22 7.5 0.2 0.0
ULS23 4.4 0.2 0.0
ULS24 7.5 0.2 0.0

2.11.4   Forces and Moments acting on Ring Beam

Di
Hoop Tension Th = ∑ (RadialForces) *
2

Ring Beam Tension Capacity Trf

Twisting Moment Mt = ∑ (TorsionalMomentComponents * Eccentricity)

Equivalent Bending Moment Me = Mt * ( D2 − W


i
wf
+
Ww
2 )
Ring Beam Moment Capacity Mre

Sl No. Ring Beam


Forces and Moments for Circumferential Reinforcement Design
Th (kN) Trf (kN) Mt (kN.m/m) Me (kN.m) Mre (kN.m)
ULS1 409.4 882.2 1.4 24.3 116.4
ULS2 409.4 882.2 1.4 24.3 116.4
ULS3 15.9 882.2 0.4 7.6 202.2
ULS4 21.2 882.2 0.6 9.7 201.0
ULS5 15.9 882.2 0.4 7.6 202.2
ULS6 21.2 882.2 0.6 9.7 201.0
ULS7 263.2 882.2 1.0 17.0 150.4
ULS8 350.9 882.2 1.3 22.2 130.2
ULS9 263.2 882.2 1.0 17.0 150.4
ULS10 350.9 882.2 1.3 22.2 130.2
ULS11 15.9 882.2 0.4 7.6 202.2
ULS12 21.2 882.2 0.6 9.7 201.0
ULS13 263.2 882.2 1.0 17.0 150.4
ULS14 350.9 882.2 1.3 22.2 130.2
ULS15 263.2 882.2 0.9 16.3 150.4
ULS16 350.9 882.2 2.3 40.0 130.2
ULS17 350.9 882.2 1.2 21.5 130.2
ULS18 15.9 882.2 0.4 7.6 202.2
ULS19 21.2 882.2 0.9 16.6 201.0
ULS20 21.2 882.2 0.6 9.7 201.0
ULS21 273.6 882.2 1.0 17.4 148.3
ULS22 361.3 882.2 1.3 22.6 127.8
ULS23 273.6 882.2 1.0 17.4 148.3
ULS24 361.3 882.2 1.3 22.6 127.8
 
2.12   Grade Slab Design

2.12.1   Tension Resistance

Di − 2 * Wwf W
Grade Slab Radius R= + w 17625 mm
2 2

Grade Slab Rebar Area Ast 523.6 mm²

(δh)3 * Ec * Tg
Pressure due to Settlement Ps = 3 4
(0.662) * (R)
1
( ( ) )
2
Tension Stress at Slab Center σc = 0.423 * Ec * (Ps)2 * R 3
S

1
( ( ) )
2
Tension Stress at Slab Edge σb = 0.328 * Ec * (Ps)2 * R 3
S

σc + σb
Total Tension Force on 1 m Strip Tf = * Tg
2
Tension Resisting Force Tr = Ast * f y * γms

Sl.No Ps (N/mm²) σc (N/mm²) σb (N/mm²) Tf (kN) Tr (kN)


ULC1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 236.8
ULC2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 236.8
ULC3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.5 236.8
ULC4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.7 236.8
ULC5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.5 236.8
ULC6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.7 236.8
ULC7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 236.8
ULC8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 236.8
ULC9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 236.8
ULC10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 236.8
ULC11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.5 236.8
ULC12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.7 236.8
ULC13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 236.8
ULC14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 236.8
ULC15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 236.8
ULC16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.5 236.8
ULC17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 236.8
ULC18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.5 236.8
ULC19 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.2 236.8
ULC20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.7 236.8
ULC21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.1 236.8
ULC22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.1 236.8
ULC23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.1 236.8
ULC24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.1 236.8
Note : Grade Slab is considered for analysis purpose and the design shall be verified by the user using FEM
3.0   SUMMARY

3.1   Stability Checks


Condition Combination Actual Allowable Status
FOS Uplift SLS 3 5.80 1.20 PASS
FOS Uplift - CLC CLC 1 5.80 1.00 PASS
FOS Sliding SLS 3 17.19 1.50 PASS
FOS Overturning SLS 15 5.93 1.50 PASS
Bearing Pressure under Fdn. (kN/m²) SLS 9 48.78 147.20 PASS
Bearing Pressure under Tank (kN/m²) SLS 15 93.33 147.20 PASS

3.2   Immediate Settlement


Condition Combination Actual Allowable Status
Max. Differential Settlement (mm) SLS 11 4.2 25.0 PASS

3.3   Ring Beam Design

3.3.1   Ring Beam Minimum Reinforcement


Position Actual Allowable Status
Vertical Reinforcement Percentage (%) 0.30 0.12 PASS
Vertical Reinforcement Spacing (mm) 150.0 192.0 PASS
Longitudinal Reinforcement Percentage (%) 0.90 0.20 PASS
Side Bar Spacing (mm) 99.5 258.5 PASS
Main Bar Spacing (mm) 90.0 156.9 PASS
Note:
1. The minimum reinforcement required is computed as per Table 11.6.1.

           2. The maximum allowed spacing for Side rebar is computed as per Cl. 9.9.3 (b).

           3. The maximum allowed spacing for Side and Main rebar is computed as per Cl. 24.3.2.

3.3.2   Ring Beam Capacity


Condition Combination Required Capacity Status
Hoop Tension (kN) ULS 1 409.4 882.2 PASS
Equivalent Bending Moment (kN.m) ULS 16 40.0 130.2 PASS
Note:
Hoop tension and equivalent bending due to torsion are resisted by the Hoop Reinforcement.

3.4   Grade Slab Design

3.4.1   Grade Slab Minimum Reinforcement


Position Provided Min.Percentage Max Spacing Status
Top 10Φ at 150.0 c/c 0.17% 0.15% 186.9 PASS
Bottom 10Φ at 150.0 c/c 0.2% 0.15% 186.9 PASS
Note:
1. The minimum reinforcement required is computed as per Cl. 9.6.1.2.

           2. The maximum allowed spacing for rebar is computed as per Cl. 24.3.2.

3.4.2   Grade Slab Capacity


Condition Combination Required Capacity Status
Tension Capacity ULS 19 1.2 236.8 PASS

You might also like