Chapter Two : Literature Review
2.1 Introduction
This chapter reviews literature related to impact of corona virus pandemic on people. It focuses on
health, socioeconomic and education sectors.
Covid-19
According to (WHO, 2020), The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a dramatic loss of human life
worldwide and presents an unprecedented challenge to public health, food systems and the world of
work. The economic and social disruption caused by the pandemic is devastating: tens of millions
of people are at risk of falling into extreme poverty, while the number of undernourished people,
currently estimated at nearly 690 million, could increase by up to 132 million by the end of the
year.
Millions of enterprises face an existential threat. Nearly half of the world’s 3.3 billion global
workforce are at risk of losing their livelihoods. Informal economy workers are particularly
vulnerable because the majority lack social protection and access to quality health care and have
lost access to productive assets. Without the means to earn an income during lockdowns, many are
unable to feed themselves and their families. For most, no income means no food, or, at best, less
food and less nutritious food.
2.2 Theoretical Literature Review
2.2.1 Noy et al Theory
According to (Noy, 2020) The impact of the pandemic on world GDP growth is massive. The
COVID-19 global recession is the deepest since the end of World War II (Figure 1). The global
economycontracted by 3,5 percent in 2020 according to the April 2021 World Economic Outlook
Report published by the IMF, a 7 percent loss relative to the 3.4 percent growth forecast back in
October 2019. While virtually every country covered by the IMF posted negative
growth in 2020 (IMF 2020b), the downturn was more pronounced in the poorest parts of the
world. The impact of the pandemic on world GDP growth is massive. The COVID-19 global
recession is the deepest since the end of World War II . The global economy
contracted by 3,5 percent in 2020 according to the April 2021 World Economic Outlook Report
published by the IMF, a 7 percent loss relative to the 3.4 percent growth forecast back in October
2019. While virtually every country covered by the IMF posted negative growth in 2020. Tthe
downturn was more pronounced in the poorest parts of the world. The impact of the pandemic on
world GDP growth is massive. The COVID-19 global recession is the deepest since the end of
World War II . The global economy contracted by 3,5 percent in 2020 according to the April
2021 World Economic Outlook Report published by the IMF, a 7 percent loss relative to the 3.4
percent growth forecast back in October 2019. While virtually every country covered by the IMF
posted negative growth in 2020, the downturn was more pronounced in the poorest parts of the
world (Noy, 2020). The impact of the shock is likely to be long-lasting. While the global
economy is expected to recover this year, the level of GDP at the end of 2021 in both advanced
and emerging market and developing economies (EMDE) is projected to remain below the pre-
virus baseline . As with the immediate impact, the magnitude of the medium-term cost also
varies significantly across countries, with EMDE suffering the greatest loss. The IMF (2021)
projects that in 2024 the World GDP will be 3 percent (6
percent for low-income countries (LICs)) below the no-COVID scenario. Along the same lines,
(Djiofack, 2020) estimate that African GDP would be permanently 1 percent to 4 percent lower
than in the pre-COVID outlook, depending on the duration of the crisis.
2.2.2 The Pandemic Management Theory
The COVID-19 crisis is an individual and genre-specific identity crisis in which basic ethical
attitudes towards life are questioned, where the social distancing and restrictions have a
separating, dissociating effect on the integration process with different levels of life. Therefore
the inner circle of the model approaches biocentric connections of humans to themselves, to
others and to the “complex of living elements”, to nature. Maintaining a connection in these
three levels is necessary to sustain a healthy identity during pandemics. The causes and
consequences of separations from these levels of life because of biocentric boundaries, which are
defined in the model (Stueck, 2021)
Stuck, 2021 concludes that in order to protect the connection of humans to themselves, to others
and to the complex of living beings (nature) sup-port options are shown in six biocentric fields of
action during and after pandemics: maintaining affective communication, maintenance of lively
corporeality, contact with one’s own identity and inner oriented self-reflexion together with
others, construction of life sense and expression of life potentials, expansion of consciousness
and perception of the wholeness, development of ecological awareness and sustainable biocentric
lifestyles and attitudes.
Socio-economic Impact of covid-19 on Community
The UN’s Framework for the Immediate Socio-Economic Response to the COVID 19 Crisis
warns that “The COVID-19 pandemic is far more than a health crisis: it is affecting societies and
economies at their core. While the impact of the pandemic will vary from country to country, it
will most likely increase poverty and inequalities at a global scale, making achievement of SDGs
even more urgent.Assessing the impacts of the COVID-19 crisis on societies, economies and
vulnerable groups is fundamental to inform and tailor the responses of governments and partners
to recover from the crisis and ensure that no one is left behind in this effort.Without urgent socio-
economic responses, global suffering will escalate, jeopardizing lives and livelihoods for years to
come. Immediate development responses in this crisis must be undertaken with an eye to the
future. Development trajectories in the long-term will be affected by the choices countries make
now and the support they receive.” The United Nations has mobilized the full capacity of the UN
system through its 131 country teams serving 162 countries and territories, to support national
authorities in developing public health preparedness and response plans to the COVID-19 crisis
(UNDP, 2020)
Educational Impact of Covid-19 on Community
The pandemic has taken a substantial toll on students’ academic progress as well as on their
mental health. School systems can respond across multiple horizons to help students get back on
track. The pandemic has taken a substantial toll on students’ academic progress as well as on
their mental health. School systems can respond across multiple horizons to help students get
back on track.
we examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on student learning and well-being, and
identify potential considerations for school systems as they support students in recovery and
beyond. Our key findings include the following:
The length of school closures varied widely across the world. School buildings in middle-income
Latin America and South Asia were fully or partially closed the longest—for 75 weeks or more.
Those in high-income Europe and Central Asia were fully or partially closed for less time (30
weeks on average), as were those in low-income sub-Saharan Africa (34 weeks on average).
Access to quality remote and hybrid learning also varied both across and within countries. In
Tanzania, while school buildings were closed, children in just 6 percent of households listened to
radio lessons, 5 percent accessed TV lessons, and fewer than 1 percent participated in online
learning.
Furthermore, pandemic-related learning delays stack up on top of historical learning inequities.
The World Bank estimates that while students in high-income countries gained an average of 50
harmonized learning outcomes (HLO) points a year prepandemic, students in low-income
countries were gaining just 20, leaving those students several years behind. (Bryant, 2022)
Health impact of covid-19 on Community
Most people who get coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) recover within a few weeks. But
some people — even those who had mild versions of the disease — might have symptoms that
last a long time afterward. These ongoing health problems are sometimes called post-COVID-19
syndrome, post-COVID conditions, long COVID-19, long-haul COVID-19, and post acute
sequelae of SARS COV-2 infection (PASC).
Post-COVID-19 syndrome involves a variety of new, returning or ongoing symptoms that people
experience more than four weeks after getting COVID-19. In some people, post-COVID-19
syndrome lasts months or years or causes disability.
Research suggests that between one month and one year after having COVID-19, 1 in 5 people
ages 18 to 64 has at least one medical condition that might be due to COVID-19. Among people
age 65 and older, 1 in 4 has at least one medical condition that might be due to COVID-19.
Organ damage could play a role. People who had severe illness with COVID-19 might
experience organ damage affecting the heart, kidneys, skin and brain. Inflammation and
problems with the immune system can also happen. It isn't clear how long these effects might
last. The effects also could lead to the development of new conditions, such as diabetes or a heart
or nervous system condition.
The experience of having severe COVID-19 might be another factor. People with severe
symptoms of COVID-19 often need to be treated in a hospital intensive care unit. This can result
in extreme weakness and post-traumatic stress disorder, a mental health condition triggered by a
terrifying event. (Mayo Clinic, 2022)
Conceptual framework
EV
Rrrrrrrrrvghb
Impact of corona Community
Socio-Economic Travelling Consumers and suppliers
Educational Teachers and students
doctors
Health Old people
Poor people