Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views24 pages

Tutorial 4 Solutions

The document provides solutions to exercises on econometrics. Exercise 1 involves calculating elasticities, residuals, and hypothesis testing for regression models of energy demand. Exercise 2 estimates a regression model of telephone expenditures and tests the significance of variables. Exercise 3 defines the coefficients in a consumption function and how to calculate the residual sum of squares.

Uploaded by

eya Khamassi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views24 pages

Tutorial 4 Solutions

The document provides solutions to exercises on econometrics. Exercise 1 involves calculating elasticities, residuals, and hypothesis testing for regression models of energy demand. Exercise 2 estimates a regression model of telephone expenditures and tests the significance of variables. Exercise 3 defines the coefficients in a consumption function and how to calculate the residual sum of squares.

Uploaded by

eya Khamassi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 24

ECONOMETRICS

TUTORIAL 4 SOLUTIONS

Fall session
EXERCISE 1

1) 𝛽መ1 and 𝛽መ2 have elasticity interpretations. For example, for India a 1% increase in
per capita real GDP will lead to a 1.006% increase in per-capita energy demand. A 1%
increase in real energy price will lead to a 0.068% decrease in per-capita energy
demand.

2) For Korea:
RSS
We know that ˆ 2
so, RSS  ˆ u2   n  k 
nk
u

 0.031  17  3
²

 0.0134

2
RSS RSS
We know that R 2  1  so, TSS 
TSS 1  R2
0.0134

1  0.54
 0.0291

ESS  TSS  RSS


 0.0291  0.0134
 0.0157

3
3) For Indonesa

H 0 :  2  0 H 0 : 3  0
 
H1 :  2  0 H1 :  3  0
ttab  t0.025,14  2.145 ttab  t0.025,14  2.145

ˆ2 1.564 ˆ3 0.488


tcal    6.684 tcal    2.5
 
se ˆ2 0.234  
se ˆ3 0.195

tcal >ttab  Reject H 0 tcal >ttab  Reject H 0

4
EXERCISE 2

Yi  1   2 I i   3 Si  U i

 0.2782 0.00409 0.03859    yi   5475 


    
 X T Y     yi Ii   195375 
1
X T
X  0.00409 0.0002918 0.001955 
 0.03859 0.001955 0.04139    y S   15670 
   i i  
1)

   X X   X TY 
1
ˆ T

 0.2782 0.00409 0.03859   5475  119.356 


    
  0.00409 0.0002918 0.001955  195375    3.982 
 0.03859 0.001955 0.04139   15670   55.343 
    
5
Yˆi  119.356  3.982 I i  55.343Si

1)

ˆ1  119.356  If the annual family income and the number of family mumbers
were 0 then, the annual expenditure on fixed telephone by
a family is 119.356 Euros.

ˆ2  3.982  If the annual family income increases by one thousand Euro then,
the annual expenditure on fixed telephone by a family increases
by 3.982 Euros.

ˆ3  55.343  If the number of family members increases by one person,


the annual expenditure on fixed telephone increases by 55.343 Euros.
6
2) First method Second method
ESS
R 
2
R  1
2 RSS
TSS
TSS
ESS  ˆ T  X T Y   ny 2
 5475  2 RSS   yi2  ˆ T  X T Y 
   5475 
ESS  119.356 3.982 55.343  195375   15   
 15670   15   2340325  2298682.16  41642.84
 
 2298682.16 -1998375 = 300307.16
41642.84
TSS   y ny R  1  0.8782
2 2 2
i
341950
 2340325  15  3652
 341950
300307.16
R2   0.8782
341950
87.82% of the variation of annual expenditure on fixed telephone by a family
7
is explained by the regression.
RSS 41642.84
3) ˆ 
2
  3470.24
nk 15  3
u

 
var   ˆ u  X X 
1
4) ˆ 2 T

 0.2782 0.00409 0.03859 


 
 3470.24  0.00409 0.0002918 0.001955 
 0.03859 0.001955 0.04139 

 965.42 14.19 133.92 
 
  14.19 1.013 6.78 
 133.92 6.78 143.63 

8
H 0 :  2  0
5) 
H1 :  2  0
ttab  t0.025,12  2.179

ˆ2 3.982
tcal    3.96
 
se ˆ2 1.013

tcal >ttab  Reject H 0 , annual family income is significant at 5% level.

H 0 : 3  0

H1 :  3  0
ttab  t0.025,12  2.179

ˆ3 55.343
tcal    4.62
 
se ˆ3 143.63

tcal >ttab  Reject H 0 , the number of family members is significant at 5% level.


9
 H 0 :  2  3  0
6) 
 H1 :  2  0 and/or 3  0
R2 / k 1 0.8782 / 2
Fcal    43.26
1  R  / n  k 1  0.8782  /12
2

Ftable  Fk 1,n  k  F2,12  3.89


Fcal >Ftable
 Reject H 0 , the model is globally significant at 5% level.

10
H 0 :  2  3 H 0 :  2  3  0
7)  
H1 :  2   3 H1 :  2  3  0
ttab  t0.025,12  2.179

ˆ2  ˆ3 ˆ2  ˆ3


tcal  

se ˆ2  ˆ3   
ˆ ˆ2  var
var  
ˆ ˆ3  2cov 
ˆ ˆ2 , ˆ3 
3.982  55.343

1.013  143.63   2  6.78 
 4.08
tcal >ttab  Reject H 0 .

11
H 0 :  3  10  2 H 0 :  3  10  2  0
8)  
H1 :  3  10  2 H1 :  3  10  2  0
ttab  t0.025,12  2.179

ˆ3  10 ˆ2 ˆ3  10 ˆ2


tcal  

se ˆ3  10 ˆ2   
ˆ ˆ3  var
var  
ˆ 10 ˆ2  2cov 
ˆ 10 ˆ3 , ˆ2 
55.343  10  3.982

143.63  100 1.013   20  6.78 
 0.796
tcal <ttab  Fail to reject H 0 .

12
Yˆi  110.372  4.095I i  46.642Si  17.36M i ; R 2  0.883
( t value ) (2.95) (3.52) (2.41) (0.4)

H 0 :  4  0
9) 
H1 :  4  0
ttab  t0.025,11  2.201
tcal  0.4
tcal <ttab  Fail to reject H 0 .

We calculate the adjusted R squared for each model:


 n 1   14 
R1  1  1  R 2     1   1  0.8782    0.8579

 nk  12 
 n 1   14 
R 2  1  1  R 2     1    1  0.883     0.8510
 nk  11 
 We choose the first model with the highest R 2 . 13
EXERCISE 3
ct  1   2 pt  3 rt  ut

c
1) 2   0 ; if the price , the consumption
p

r
2   0 ; if the revenue , the consumption
p

RSS   ct2  ˆ T  X T C 
24

t 1
 0.06 0.03 0.06   25   1.02 
   X X    X T C    0.03 0.2     
1
ˆ T
0    2    0.35 
 0.06 0.35   7   0.95 
 0
 25 
 
 33.34  1.02 0.35 0.95   2   33.34  31.45  1.89
7
1.89  
So,ˆ 
2
=0.09 14
21
 
ˆ ˆ  ˆ u2  X T X 
1
3) Var
 0.06 0.03 0.06   0.0054 0.0027 0.0054 
   
 0.09   0.03 0.2 0    0.0027 0.018 0 
 0.06    
 0 0.35   0.0054 0 0.0315 

 
se ˆ2  var  
ˆ  0.018   0.134
ˆ ˆ2  var

se  ˆ  
3
ˆ  ˆ  
var 3
ˆ  0.0315   0.177
var

H 0 : 2  0
4) i) 
 H1 :  2  0
ttab  t0.025,21  2.08

ˆ2 0.35
tcal    2.61
 
se ˆ2 0.134

tcal  ttab  Reject H 0 , the price is significant at 5% level. 15


 H 0 : 3  0
ii) 
 H1 :  3  0
ttab  t0.025,21  2.08

ˆ3 0.95
tcal    5.37
 
se ˆ3 0.177

tcal  ttab  Reject H 0 , the income is significant at 5% level.


 H 0 :  2  3  0
iii) 
 H1 :  2  0 and/or3  0
 25  2
   
ESS  ˆ T  X T C   Tc 2  1.02 0.35 0.95   2   24     5.4
25
7  24 
 
5.4 / 2
Fcal   30
1.89 / 21
Ftab  F2,21  3.47
Fcal  Ftab  Reject H 0 , the revenue and the price affect both the consumption. 16
 H 0 : 3  1
iv) 
 H1 :  3  1
ttab  t0.025,21  2.08

ˆ3  1 0.95  1
tcal    0.28
 
se ˆ3 0.177

tcal  ttab  Fail to reject H 0 .

17
EXERCISE 4

The production function:


1) log  PROD   1   2 log  AREA    3 log  LAB    4 log  FERT   u

The fitted regression equation is:


logˆ  PROD  =-1.548+0.3617log(AREA)+0.4328 log (LAB)+0.2095 log (FERT)

All estimates have elasticity interpretations. For example, a 1% increase in labor


will lead to a 0.4328% increase in rice output. A 1% increase in fertilizer will lead to a
0.2095% increase in rice output.
All p-values are less than 0.005 implying all coefficients are significantly different from
zero at 5% significance level.
18
 
2) CI     ˆ  t
4  4 
 2
,n k
 
ˆ
 se  4 

  0.2095  1.96  0.0383
  0.1344, 0.2846

 H 0 :  2  0.5  H 0 :  2  0.5  0
3)  
 H1 :  2  0.5  H1 :  2  0.5  0

ttab  t0.025,100  1.96

ˆ2  0.5 0.3617  0.5


tcal    2.16
 
se ˆ2 0.0640

tcal >ttab  Reject H 0 .

19
H :  2  3
4)  0  H 0 :  2  3  0
 
 H1 :  2   3  H1 :  2   3  0
The test can be performed with an F statistic or a t-statistic.
ttab  1.96

ˆ2  ˆ3 ˆ2  ˆ3 0.36174  0.43285


tcal     0.585

se ˆ2  ˆ3  
ˆ ˆ2  ˆ3
var  0.0148

tcal  ttab  Fail to reject H 0 .


Using the F statistic we have:

Fcal  0.342 that is


 RSSR  RSSU  / m
 0.342
RSSU / n  k
Ftab  F1,100  3.94
Fcal  Ftab  Fail to reject H 0 . 20
5)  H 0 :  2   3   4  1   H 0 :  2   3   4  1  0
 
 H1 :  2   3   4  1  H1 :  2   3   4  1  0
ttab  1.96

ˆ2  ˆ3  ˆ4  1 ˆ2  ˆ3  ˆ4  1 0.3617  0.4328  0.2095  1


tcal     0.168

se ˆ2  ˆ3  ˆ4  
ˆ ˆ2  ˆ3  ˆ4
var  0.00057

tcal  ttab  Fail to reject H 0 .

Using the F statistic we have:

Fcal  0.0295
Ftab  F1,100  3.94
Fcal  Ftab  Fail to reject H 0 .

21
 H 0 :  2   3  0 and  2   3   4 =1
6) 
 H1 :  2   3  0 and/ or  2   3   4  1

Fcal 
 RSSR  RSSU  / m  RSSR  RSSU  / 2

RSSU / n  k RSSU /100
Ftab  F2,100  3.09
If Fcal  Ftab  Reject H 0 .

22
EXERCISE 5

MAˆi  8.5  0.3 NFi  NSi  0.5 NTi  1.2Gi ; RSS  0.89
(4.5) (7.1) (2.6) (1.9) (0.3)

H 0 :   0
1) 
H1 :   0
ttab  t0.025,25  2.06
1.2
tcal  4
0.3
tcal  ttab  Reject H 0 .

2)  is the average difference in average obtained in master between men and women.

23
3) MAi  1   2 NFi   3 NSi   4 NTi   Gi  ui (1)
MAi  1  NFi  NSi  0.2 NTi  ui (2)

There are four restrictions


  1, 3  1,  4  0.2 and   0
2

H 0 :  2  1 and  3  1 and  4  0.2 and   0



H1 :  2  1 and/or  3  1 and/or  4  0.2 and/or   0

Fcal 
 RSSR  RSSU  / m  3.8  0.89  / 4
  20.43
RSSU / n  k 0.89 / 25
Ftab  F4,25  2.76
Fcal  Ftab  Reject H 0 , we reject the restricted model.

24

You might also like