02 RPS Kurikulum 2020 - Guided Writinguntuk OASE
02 RPS Kurikulum 2020 - Guided Writinguntuk OASE
Bachelor of English
Faculty of Humanities, Udayana University
COURSE DESCRIPTION
(Deskripsi Mata Kuliah)
Guided Writing is designed to enable the first semester students of English Department Faculty of
Humanities to use English language effectively in writing by providing additional supported steps
towards independent writing. To achieve the expected learning outcomes of the course, the students will
learn about English word formation, present and past principles as adjectives, parallel sentences,
transition and structural words, as well as paragraph features. The course is arranged in lectures, group
discussion and individual works. The assessment will include individual and group assignments, middle
test and final test.
1
1. to internalize academic values and demonstrate academic honesty with 2
themselves, integrity and professional ethics with the spirit of independence and hard
work of speaking individually, or collaboratively
2. to describe basic concepts and methods in guided writing. 3
3. to demonstrate proficiency in the writing skills, characterized by the ability to 4
build English vocabulary through word formation, distinguish and apply present and past
participle as adjectives, recognize and write parallel sentence as well as make use of
transition and structural words
4. to demonstrate the ability to explain common paragraph features, identify topics 4
and main ideas as well as develop paragraph with descriptive details.
5. to formulate a text in English for a given topic with clear and logical 3&4
organization; minimum grammatical error; proper grammatical constructions; and wide-
ranging vocabularies.
LEARNING TOPICS
(Topik Pembelajaran)
2
2. explain the semester course design of Prose Analysis including the learning outcomes and how
to achieve them for one semester.
3. build English vocabulary through word formation
Optional Reading:
(i) Kelly, C. and Arlen Gargagliano. 2004. Writing from Within. 5th ed. Cambridge University
Press.
(ii) Langan, John. 2005. College Writing Skills with Readings. 6th ed. Mc Graw Hill Companies
(iii) Palmer, G. 2010. Real Writing 1. 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press
(iv) Zemach, D.E. and Carlos Islam. Paragraph Writing: from Sentence to Paragraph. Macmillan
(v) Arnaudet, Martin L and Marry Ellen Barret. 2nd ed. Paragraph Development
E. Time Allotment
2 x 3 x 60’ = 360’ (self study)
2 x 3 x 60’ = 360’ (structured assignment)
2 x 3 x 50’ = 300’ (Classroom activities)
F. Assessment
3
WEEK 3, 4, & 5: PRESENT AND PAST PARTICIPLES AS ADJECTIVES, PARALLEL
SENTENCES
Optional Reading:
(i) Kelly, C. and Arlen Gargagliano. 2004. Writing from Within. 5th ed. Cambridge University
Press
(ii) Langan, John. 2005. College Writing Skills with Readings. 6th ed. Mc Graw Hill Companies
(iii) Palmer, G. 2010. Real Writing 1. 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press
(iv) Zemach, D.E. and Carlos Islam. Paragraph Writing: from Sentence to Paragraph. Macmillan
(v) Arnaudet, Martin L and Marry Ellen Barret. 2nd ed. Paragraph Development
E. Time Allotment
3 x 3 x 60’ = 540’ (self study)
4
3 x 3 x 60’ = 540’ (structured assignment)
3 x 3 x 50’ = 450’ (Classroom activities)
F. Assessment
Optional Reading:
(i) Kelly, C. and Arlen Gargagliano. 2004. Writing from Within. 5th ed. Cambridge University
Press
(ii) Langan, John. 2005. College Writing Skills with Readings. 6th ed. Mc Graw Hill Companies
(iii) Palmer, G. 2010. Real Writing 1. 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press
(iv) Zemach, D.E. and Carlos Islam. Paragraph Writing: from Sentence to Paragraph. Macmillan
(v) Arnaudet, Martin L and Marry Ellen Barret. 2nd ed. Paragraph Development
5
Online via OASE & WEBEX meeting for face-to-face interaction.
E. Time Allotment
2 x 3 x 60’ = 360’ (self-study)
2 x 3 x 60’ = 360’ (structured assignment)
2 x 3 x 50’ = 300’ (Classroom activities)
F. Assessment
Method and Instrument CLO (Course Learning
Outcome)
Observation: Holistic Rubric CLO 1 / ELO 2
Question and Answer: Holistic Rubric CLO 2 and 3/ ELO 3
and 4
Quiz: Short Answer CLO 2 and 3 / ELO 3
amd 4
Proportion Score
5%
Optional Reading:
(i) Kelly, C. and Arlen Gargagliano. 2004. Writing from Within. 5th ed. Cambridge University
Press
6
(ii) Langan, John. 2005. College Writing Skills with Readings. 6th ed. Mc Graw Hill Companies
(iii) Palmer, G. 2010. Real Writing 1. 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press
(iv) Zemach, D.E. and Carlos Islam. Paragraph Writing: from Sentence to Paragraph. Macmillan
(v) Arnaudet, Martin L and Marry Ellen Barret. 2nd ed. Paragraph Development
E. Time Allotment
1. Individual task 2 x 50’ = 100’
2. Feed back 2 x 35’ = 70’
F. Assessment
Method and Instrument CLO (Course Learning
Outcome)
Middle Test: Essay and Multiple Choices CLO 2 and 3 / ELO 3
and 4
Observation CLO 1 / ELO 2
Proportion Score
20%
7
(ii) Maharani, Isnu SA. 2019. Guide Writing. English Department Faculty of Arts.
(iii) McCarthy, M. and Felicity O’Dell. 2009. Academic Vocabulary in Use. Cambridge University
Press.
(iv) Peterson, Patricia Wilcox. 2003. Developing Writing. United States Department of State.
Office of English language Program.
(v) Spencer, D.H. 1967. Guided Composition Exercises. Longman.
Optional Reading:
(i) Kelly, C. and Arlen Gargagliano. 2004. Writing from Within. 5th ed. Cambridge University
Press
(ii) Langan, John. 2005. College Writing Skills with Readings. 6th ed. Mc Graw Hill Companies
(iii) Palmer, G. 2010. Real Writing 1. 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press
(iv) Zemach, D.E. and Carlos Islam. Paragraph Writing: from Sentence to Paragraph. Macmillan
(v) Arnaudet, Martin L and Marry Ellen Barret. 2nd ed. Paragraph Development
E. Time Allotment
3 x 3 x 60’ = 540’ (self study)
3 x 3 x 60’ = 540’ (structured assignment)
3 x 3 x 50’ = 450’ (Classroom activities)
F. Assessment
8
4. The students will be able to operate WEBEX and LMS OASE for the course
Optional Reading:
(i) Kelly, C. and Arlen Gargagliano. 2004. Writing from Within. 5th ed. Cambridge University
Press
(ii) Langan, John. 2005. College Writing Skills with Readings. 6th ed. Mc Graw Hill Companies
(iii) Palmer, G. 2010. Real Writing 1. 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press
(iv) Zemach, D.E. and Carlos Islam. Paragraph Writing: from Sentence to Paragraph. Macmillan
(v) Arnaudet, Martin L and Marry Ellen Barret. 2nd ed. Paragraph Development
E. Time Allotment
2 x 3 x 60’ = 360’ (self study)
2 x 3 x 60’ = 360’ (structured assignment)
2 x 3 x 50’ = 300’ (Classroom activities)
F. Assessment
9
Quiz: Short Answer CLO 2 and 4 / ELO 3
and 4
Proportion Score
10%
Optional Reading:
● Kelly, C. and Arlen Gargagliano. 2004. Writing from Within. 5th ed. Cambridge University
Press
● Langan, John. 2005. College Writing Skills with Readings. 6th ed. Mc Graw Hill Companies
● Palmer, G. 2010. Real Writing 1. 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press
10
● Zemach, D.E. and Carlos Islam. Paragraph Writing: from Sentence to Paragraph. Macmillan
● Arnaudet, Martin L and Marry Ellen Barret. 2nd ed. Paragraph Development
E. Time Allotment
2 x 3 x 60’ = 360’ (self study)
2 x 3 x 60’ = 360’ (structured assignment)
2 x 3 x 50’ = 300’ (Classroom activities)
F. Assessment
E. Time Allotment
1. Composition 2 x 50’ = 100’
2. Feed back 2 x 35’ = 70’
11
F. Assessment
REFERENCES
Required Readings
Maharani, Isnu SA. 2019. Guide Writing. English Department Faculty of Arts.
McCarthy, M. and Felicity O’Dell. 2009. Academic Vocabulary in Use. Cambridge University Press.
Peterson, Patricia Wilcox. 2003. Developing Writing. United States Department of State. Office of
English language Program.
Spencer, D.H. 1967. Guided Composition Exercises. Longman.
Additional Readings
Arnaudet, Martin L and Marry Ellen Barret. 2nd ed. Paragraph Development
Kelly, C. and Arlen Gargagliano. 2004. Writing from Within. 5th ed. Cambridge University Press
Langan, John. 2005. College Writing Skills with Readings. 6th ed. Mc Graw Hill Companies
Palmer, G. 2010. Real Writing 1. 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press
Zemach, D.E. and Carlos Islam. Paragraph Writing: from Sentence to Paragraph. Macmillan
Online Materials
Improving writing with a focus on guided writing
https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/6649/8/Guided_writing_materials_Redacted.pdf
COURSES POLICIES
1. Assessment Weighting
Weighting is based on:
1. the learning process has a weight of 60%
12
2. the learning outcomes have a weight of ≤40%
3. attitude assessment weighs 25-40% of the overall domain (knowledge + skill + attitude)
4. Average midterms exam (20%)
5. Practicums, seminars or other assignments (60%) and
6. Final exam of semester (20%)
Assessment Weight
Formative Assessment Proportion of Score
Process Quiz : 20%
(soft skill Individual Task : 15%
assessment
Presentation : 15%
including
this Peer Assessment : 10%
process)
Summative Assessment
Middle Semester Test : 20%
Final Semester Test : 20%
Total : 100%
2. Grading
Students will be provided with a final letter grade based on the criteria specified in Faculty of
Humanities, Udayana University Grading System Policies and Procedures. The instructor reserves the
right to penalize any additional facets of unprofessional and irresponsible work dispositions or conduct,
if the need arises. Partial evaluations will be made with numbers (exams, tests, papers, presentations
and so on). Letter grades of “A” through “E” (course final grade) will be awarded. Grades are awarded
in courses in which you are officially enrolled after the official record date. The deadline to withdraw
from a course is specified in the Academic Calendar for each semester Students grade will be based on
the following grading system.
3. Hurdle Requirement
Hurdle Requirement Hurdle requirement is the basic conditions that students need to
accomplish during the process of teaching and learning:
1. Attendance
13
Students must attend the class at least 75 % or 12 times per semester.
Less attendance will result in the disapproval for the students to attend
the final exam
2. Submission
All assignments and additional activities must be done or submitted on
the due date decided by both the lecturer and the students. Late
submission will make the students considered unable to fulfill the task,
thus, there will be no mark for those assignments or activities.
3. Lectures
If for any reason a lecture is cancelled, the lecturer must find a
substitution class to fulfill the numbers of class meetings (16 times
including mid and final semester tests)
4. Surveillance Method
5. Appeal Procedures
Appeal Procedures 1. The first appeal stage to the lecturer informally. In case it could not be
resolved, or they do not want to contact the lecturers directly.
2. The second appeal stage to the study program coordinator, they can
complain to the Head of Bachelor of English by submitting an appealing
form in accordance with the standard procedure. The Head of BE will show
the copy of the raw score with grade and explain the result verbally. If the
matter would not satisfy the student, the Head of BE has to ask the
involving lecturers to review the relevant document and discuss with the
students and the relevant parties in order to have the finding.
3. This process has to be handled as soon as the students complain.
When the students get a satisfactory solution, the lecturers have to attend
the Faculty’s academic meeting to declare the correct grade with the reason
to modify. Then the lecturers have to edit the students’ grade on the system
and inform him/ her. Last, the lecturers send corresponding document to
registration office, and the appealing form is filed at the study program’s
office
4. The final stage of appeal stage to the vice dean.
14
Approval Date:
Approved by
BOE Coordinator
15