Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

Scribd
Upload
216 views1 page

Appendix C. Validation-Sheet-For-Quantitative

This validation sheet summarizes the evaluation of a survey questionnaire used to measure students' oral communication skills and self-esteem. The evaluator was asked to rate several criteria on a scale of 1 to 5, including the clarity of items and directions, presentation/organization of items, suitability and adequacy of items per category, attainment of research purpose, and objectivity of items. Space was also provided for additional remarks.

Uploaded by

TRECIA MAE BOLIGAO
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
216 views1 page

Appendix C. Validation-Sheet-For-Quantitative

This validation sheet summarizes the evaluation of a survey questionnaire used to measure students' oral communication skills and self-esteem. The evaluator was asked to rate several criteria on a scale of 1 to 5, including the clarity of items and directions, presentation/organization of items, suitability and adequacy of items per category, attainment of research purpose, and objectivity of items. Space was also provided for additional remarks.

Uploaded by

TRECIA MAE BOLIGAO
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

APPENDIX C.

Validation Sheet
Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Region XI
LA FILIPINA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Brgy. La Filipina, Tagum City
Tel. Nos. (084) 655-9271

VALIDATION SHEET FOR THE SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE

Title of Research Study: “Oral Communication in Context and Students’


Self-Esteem on Verbal Communication”

Researchers: Cerlan Jay Arobas Jhunie Jubahib


Kenneth Somollo Trecia Mae Boligao
Jessa Mae Feliciano Rica Jean Gemarino
Rica Pescones

To the Evaluator: Kindly check the column which fits your evaluation of each item.
Point Equivalent:
5 – Excellent 4 – Very Good 3 – Good 2 – Fair 1 - Poor

Criteria Description Rating


The vocabulary level, language, structure, and 5 4 3 2 1
Clarity of Items and conceptual level of the questions suit the level
Directions of participants. The directions and the items are
written in clear and simple language.
Presentation/Organization The items are presented and organized in logical
of Items manner.
The items appropriately represent the
substance of the research. The questions are
Suitability of Items designed to determine the conditions,
knowledge, skills, and attitude that are
supposed to be measured.
The items represent the coverage of the
Adequateness of Items per research adequately. The number of questions
Category/Indicator per category/indicator is representative enough
of all questions needed for the research.
Attainment of Purpose The instrument as a whole fulfills the objective
for which it was constructed.
The items in the questionnaire are formulated
Objectivity prudently and are free of prejudicial
conceptions.
Scale and Evaluation in The scale adopted is appropriate for the items.
Rating System

Remarks:
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________
Name and Signature of Evaluator/Date

You might also like