Word Count: 2563

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

Introduction

Main Contents

Conclusion

Recommendation

References

Appendices

0
Word Count: 2563

Executive summary

An in-depth examination of the significance of encouraging responsible behaviour in the oil and
gas business is provided by the assessment of responsible leadership in an unpredictable world
using BP as a case study. The study looks at the difficulties of promoting sustainability in the
face of uncertainty, organisational culture, and stakeholder theory, as well as the function of
moral leadership in defending the general welfare. The BP case study sheds light on the
problems and difficulties that businesses in the sector must deal with, such as the need to strike
a balance between business interests and environmental responsibility. In fostering
sustainability, responsible leadership is crucial, and the paper ends by making suggestions for
future study and application. To ensure long-term success and benefit society as a whole, the
evaluation emphasises the need for businesses in the oil and gas industry to follow responsible
leadership practises and foster sustainability.

Introduction

One of the biggest energy businesses in the world, BP is a multinational oil and gas firm with
operations in over 70 nations (BP, 2022). However, BP has come under fire for its effects on the
environment, especially in the years following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, which
caused the worst environmental catastrophe in American history (BBC, 2016). The demand on
the oil and gas sector to address its environmental impact and encourage sustainable practises
is growing. In this situation, responsible leadership is essential because it entails proactively
addressing environmental issues and advancing sustainable practises. This study will respond to
the following important inquiries in order to comprehend the significance of responsible
leadership in the oil and gas sector:

a) How does responsible leadership apply to the oil and gas sector?
b) What environmental issues does the oil and gas sector face, and how may these issues
be addressed by responsible leadership?
c) What can be gained from this event, and how has BP shown responsible leadership in
the wake of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill?

1
Word Count: 2563

d) What effects will responsible leadership have on the oil and gas sector's future?

Defining Responsible Leadership in the Oil and Gas Industry

In order to exercise responsible leadership in the oil and gas sector, one must be proactive in
addressing environmental issues and advancing sustainable practises (Riege, 2015). According
to Senge et al. (2010), this includes lowering greenhouse gas emissions, boosting energy
efficiency, and spending money on renewable energy sources. The interests of stakeholders,
such as staff members, clients, shareholders, and the larger community, must also be taken into
consideration while making decisions. This entails interacting with stakeholders, attending to
their concerns, and fostering accountability and transparency (Bansal and Roth, 2000).

Environmental Challenges Facing the Oil and Gas Industry

Climate change, air and water pollution, and biodiversity loss are just a few of the
environmental issues the oil and gas business must deal with (Wang and Hu, 2021). The sector
contributes significantly to the greenhouse gas emissions that are the main cause of climate
change (IPCC, 2014). In addition to short-term effects on the environment, the extraction of oil
and gas can seriously harm ecosystems and biodiversity (Buckley et al., 2017).

Addressing Environmental Challenges Through Responsible Leadership

In order to address the environmental issues the oil and gas business is experiencing,
responsible leadership is essential (Waddock and Bodwell, 2004). To do this, proactive steps
must be taken to lower greenhouse gas emissions, promote energy efficiency, and spend
money on renewable energy sources. Additionally, it entails speaking with stakeholders,
addressing their issues, and encouraging accountability and transparency (Tuan et al., 2019).

BP's Response to the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill

A massive environmental catastrophe, the Deepwater Horizon oil leak in 2010 had a profound
effect on the Gulf of Mexico's ecosystem, economy, and local residents (BBC, 2016). Numerous
charges of negligence and lack of transparency were levelled against BP for how it handled the

2
Word Count: 2563

crisis (Lustgarten and Jargowsky, 2010). A $20 billion compensation fund and a variety of
environmental restoration initiatives were among the steps that BP took in reaction to the crisis
to address the spill's economic and environmental effects (BP, 2010).

Socio-enviromental Uncertainty and managing risk

According to Cash et al. (2003), socio-environmental uncertainty describes the intricate and
unexpected interactions between social and environmental systems. Examples of socio-
environmental uncertainty include climate change, natural disasters, and environmental
degradation (Kasperson et al., 2001). These events exhibit a high level of complexity, variability,
and uncertainty, which makes them challenging to forecast and control (Pahl-Wostl, 2009).

Organisations face considerable risks and challenges as a result of uncertainty, including

financial, legal, and reputational concerns (Vera & Kuntz, 2007). The unpredictability of future
market conditions, resource availability, and operating expenses creates economic risks
(Hillson, 2018). Changes in laws and regulations can result in increased costs and constraints for
organisations, which are the source of regulatory risks (Chen & Delmas, 2011). The damage to a
company's reputation and brand value creates reputational risks, which can lead to a loss of
clients, investors, and market share (Grunig & Grunig, 2016).

Organisations must take a proactive and adaptable attitude to uncertainty in order to handle
these risks (Van van Heijden, 2005). This entails incorporating adaptability, agility, and
resilience into their operations and decision-making procedures (Hillson, 2018). Scenario
planning and other tools can be used by organisations to foresee and prepare for various future
outcomes (Schoemaker, 1993). Organisations can manage risks and exploit opportunities for
innovation and growth by adopting a proactive and adaptable approach to socio-environmental
uncertainty (Berkes & Folke, 1998).

Organizational culture and responsible leadership

Shared values, beliefs, customs, and practises inside an organisation that influence
employee behaviour are referred to as its organisational culture. Because it fosters a sense of
shared accountability and responsibility for the organization's effects on society and the

3
Word Count: 2563

environment, a strong organisational culture is crucial in promoting responsible behaviour.

Additionally, organisational culture influences how employees behave and make decisions,
which in turn affects how they approach their work and deal with stakeholders.

The Role of Responsible Leadership in Shaping Organizational Culture and Promoting

Sustainability

Fig. 1: Responsible Leadership

Source: (Frontier, n.d)

In order to promote sustainability and shape organisational culture, responsible leadership is

essential. By providing a good example and acting responsibly, leaders can affect the attitudes
and behaviour of their workforce. Leaders who give sustainability and social responsibility top
priority in their communication and decision-making support the development of a culture that
upholds these values. Creating chances for staff members to interact with stakeholders and
empowering them to contribute to sustainability efforts are both aspects of responsible
leadership.

Exploring the Different Types of Leadership Styles and How They Can Be Used to Promote
Responsible Behavior

Leadership philosophies can impact organisational culture and the encouragement of ethical
conduct. Different leadership philosophies have various advantages and disadvantages when it
comes to advancing sustainability. For instance, transformational leadership places a strong

4
Word Count: 2563

emphasis on vision, creativity, and empowerment, all of which can motivate staff to take charge
of sustainability projects. The emphasis on rewards and penalties in transactional leadership,
however, may make it less successful at advancing sustainability goals over the long run. A
culture of accountability and cooperation can be promoted by servant leadership, which puts
the wellbeing of stakeholders and employees first.

In general, the organisational sustainability goals and the specific organisational context should
be taken into account while selecting a leadership style. Effective leaders must also be flexible
and willing to modify their strategies when situations change, exhibiting their ability to respond
quickly to changing social and environmental conditions.

Challenges and Competing Priorities Faced by BP in Promoting Sustainability

Fact have shown that BP has operations in more than 70 nations. The corporation must
therefore balance environmental concerns with economic goals among other difficult tasks and
priorities while fostering sustainability. Maintaining profitability while reducing the harmful
effects of its operations on the environment is one of the fundamental problems. Since the
Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, which caused the worst environmental catastrophe in
American history, BP has come under fire for its environmental impact (National Commission
on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling, 2011).

The necessity to move away from fossil fuels and the rising demand for renewable energy
sources present BP with further challenges. Although BP has taken steps to invest in renewable
energy sources like solar and wind, the company still heavily depends on the production of oil
and gas for its income (BP, 2021). The business's financial interests and its sustainability
objectives are thus at odds with one another.

Role of Stakeholder Management in Addressing Challenges and Promoting Responsible

Behavior

Figure 2: Stakeholder Role

5
Word Count: 2563

Source: MDPI (2023)

In order to solve the difficulties and competing interests that BP faces in promoting
sustainability, stakeholder management is crucial. This entails considering the interests of all
parties involved in the decision-making process, such as employees, clients, shareholders, and
the larger community (Freeman, 1984). Transparency and accountability are key elements of
responsible behaviour, and BP may support them by interacting with stakeholders and
responding to their concerns.

An illustration of BP's stakeholder engagement is the company's yearly publication of a

sustainability report that details its environmental and social performance (BP, 2021). The
report provides data on BP's energy use, environmental incidents, greenhouse gas emissions,
community involvement, and social investment activities. By making this information available,
BP is fostering accountability and openness, which can assist to win over stakeholders and
encourage responsible behaviour.

Analysis of the Impact of BP's Actions on Local Communities, including the Deepwater Horizon
Oil Spill

6
Word Count: 2563

Local communities have been significantly impacted by BP's operations, especially in the wake
of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. The National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil
Spill and Offshore Drilling (2011) reported that the spill caused the loss of human life and had a
substantial negative impact on the ecology and economy of the Gulf of Mexico region.
Widespread complaints were made about how BP handled the crisis, including claims of
negligence and lack of openness.

BP implemented a number of measures in response to the Deepwater Horizon oil disaster to

address the incident's economic and environmental effects, including a $20 billion
compensation fund and a range of environmental restoration initiatives (BP, 2021). The
disaster, however, made it clear that the oil and gas sector needs to be more proactive in
addressing environmental issues and encouraging sustainable practises.

BP has had numerous environmental problems in addition to the Deepwater Horizon oil leak,
including the Texas City refinery explosion in 2005 and the Prudhoe Bay oil spill in 2006 (BP,
2021). These occurrences have had a big impact on the neighbourhood and have shown how
important it is for BP to prioritise sustainability and ethical behaviour in its business practises.

Overall, BP faces tremendous obstacles and competing interests when promoting sustainability,
but by cooperating with stakeholders and proactively addressing environmental issues, the
corporation may encourage ethical behaviour and contribute to the creation of a more
sustainable future.

Strengthening corporate social responsibility and stakeholder theory

Fig 3: Stake holder theory (CSR)

7
Word Count: 2563

Source: Jansson (2005)

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) improvement is becoming a top priority for businesses all
over the world. According to Crane et al. (2019), CSR describes how businesses act ethically and
responsibly towards their stakeholders, which include their customers, employees,
communities, and the environment. CSR programmes aim to increase social and environmental
sustainability while bringing in revenue for the business.

Stakeholder theory provides a helpful framework for comprehending CSR and the obligations
that businesses have to their stakeholders. According to the principle, businesses must create
value for all of their stakeholders in addition to their shareholders (Freeman et al., 2010).
According to this viewpoint, businesses should put the demands and interests of all its
stakeholders—including those of their employees, clients, communities, and the environment—
ahead of those of shareholders.

Implementing stakeholder theory and CSR initiatives can be challenging for corporations.
Businesses need to achieve a balance between their commitments to their stakeholders, their
financial objectives, and their pursuit of profitability. As of 2019 (Crane et al.). To guarantee
that their demands and interests are met while maintaining the company's financial viability,
this calls for rigorous planning, coordination, and communication with stakeholders.

8
Word Count: 2563

Companies must implement CSR and stakeholder theory in order to advance social and
environmental sustainability and make money. To establish a sustainable and ethical business
model, organisations must balance their economic goals with the demands and interests of
their stakeholders.

Conclusion

The problems and opposing agendas that BP encountered in promoting sustainability, including
combining environmental concerns with business interests, have been discussed in this study. It
has also looked at the impact of BP's actions on regional communities, including the Deepwater
Horizon oil disaster and other environmental incidents, as well as the role of stakeholder
management in addressing these issues and encouraging responsible behaviour. This case study
has shown that BP has had a difficult time juggling the conflicting needs of its various
stakeholders and encouraging ethical behaviour.

This case study has important ramifications for ethical leadership in the oil and gas sector. The
necessity for a change in corporate culture towards more accountability and sustainability is
emphasised, as is the significance of stakeholder management in accomplishing these
objectives. It also emphasises how crucial accountability and transparency are to encouraging
responsible behaviour.

Future research is required to fully comprehend the intricate interactions between responsible
leadership, stakeholder theory, and corporate social responsibility in the oil and gas sector.
Additionally, it is advised that oil and gas companies like BP adopt a more proactive strategy for
stakeholder engagement and management, putting a special emphasis on establishing long-
lasting, mutually advantageous relationships with all stakeholders. This will call for a
fundamental change in business culture as well as a dedication to openness, responsibility, and
ethical conduct..

Recommendation

The report makes a number of suggestions for further study and application, using BP as a case
study, to advance sustainable leadership and the oil and gas sector.

9
Word Count: 2563

 First and foremost, it is advised that future studies concentrate on the creation and
application of successful stakeholder engagement techniques in the oil and gas sector.
Examining various stakeholder engagement approaches, identifying the main
stakeholders and their expectations, and assessing how stakeholder involvement affects
the promotion of responsible behaviour are all part of this..
 Second, more study is required to determine how leadership styles might encourage
sustainability and ethical conduct in the oil and gas sector. This includes examining the
success of various leadership philosophies in advancing moral and sustainable behaviour
as well as identifying the essential leadership skills needed to advance sustainability.
 Thirdly, additional research might examine the potential for cutting-edge developments
to advance sustainability in the oil and gas sector. This entails examining the potential of
carbon capture technology and renewable energy sources as well as their viability from
an economic and environmental standpoint.
 In terms of application, it is advised that businesses in the oil and gas sector, including
BP, give top priority to the creation and application of successful sustainability policies
that strike a balance between environmental concerns and business objectives. This
entails establishing quantifiable sustainability goals, implementing best practises in
environmental management, and making investments in low-carbon technologies and
renewable energy sources.
 Additionally, businesses should give priority to stakeholder collaboration and
engagement in their sustainability initiatives. In order to understand and solve their
problems and expectations, this involves interacting with local communities,
governments, and other stakeholders. It also entails working together to advance
sustainable development.

10
Word Count: 2563

11
Word Count: 2563

References:

Bansal, P. & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological

responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717-736.

Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (1998). Linking social and ecological systems: Management

practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University

Press.

Brammer, S., Jackson, G., & Matten, D. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and

institutional theory: New perspectives on private governance. Socio-Economic

Review, 10(1), 3-28.

BP. (2017). BP Energy Outlook.

https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-
economics/energy-outlook/bp-energy-outlook-2017.pdf

BP. (2019). Advancing the Energy Transition.

https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/businesssites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/advancing-the-
energy-transition-report.pdf

BP. (2021). Sustainability Report 2020.

https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/
sustainability/bp-sustainability-report-2020.pdf

Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on
the competing values framework. John Wiley & Sons.

Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral

management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.

Cash, D. W., Adger, W. N., Berkes, F., Garden, P., Lebel, L., Olsson, P., & Pritchard, L.

12
Word Count: 2563

(2003). Scale and cross-scale dynamics: Governance and information in a

multilevel world. Ecology and Society, 8(2), 8.

Chen, V. Y., & Delmas, M. A. (2011). Measuring eco-efficiency of industrial activity: A

frontier approach. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 15(3), 400-412.

Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation:

Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-

91.

Eccles, R. G., & Serafeim, G. (2013). The performance frontier: Innovating for a

sustainable strategy. Harvard Business Review, 91(5), 50-60.

Elving, W. J. (2013). The role of communication in organisational change. Corporate

Communications: An International Journal, 18(3), 370-384.

Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge

University Press.

Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & Colle, S. D. (2010).

Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press.

Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2013). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the

territory. In Corporate social responsibility (pp. 31-56). Springer, Dordrecht.

Guler, I., Guillén, M. F., & Macpherson, J. M. (2002). Global competition, institutions, and

the diffusion of organizational practices: The international spread of the ISO 9000

quality certificates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(2), 207-232.

Hillson, D. (2018). Managing risk in projects. Routledge.

Jones, M. T. (1995). The stakeholder approach revisited. Journal of Business Ethics,

14(3), 213-221.

13
Word Count: 2563

Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H. S., Emel, J., Goble, R., & Ratick, S. (2001).

The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk analysis, 22(3), 553-

570.

Kolk, A. (2016). The social responsibility of international business: From ethics and the

environment to CSR and sustainable development. Journal of World Business,

51(1), 23-34.

Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R. and Wood, D.J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder

identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts.

Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.

https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105

Northouse, P.G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice. Sage Publications.

Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and

multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global

Environmental Change, 19(3), 354-365.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001

Sendjaya, S., Sarros, J.C., & Santora, J.C. (2008). Defining and measuring servant

leadership behaviour in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 45(2), 402-

424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00761.x

Schoemaker, P.J. (1993). Multiple scenario development: Its conceptual and behavioral

foundation. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 193-213.

https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140905

Solomon, R.C. (1992). Ethics and Excellence: Cooperation and Integrity in Business.

Oxford University Press.

14
Word Count: 2563

Van der Heijden, K. (2005). Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation. John Wiley &

Sons.

Vidal, J. (2015). The history of BP. Retrieved from

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/may/31/history-bp-oil-spills

Waddock, S.A., & Graves, S.B. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance-Financial

Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319.

https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.0.CO;2-G

15
Word Count: 2563

Appendices

Appendix 1: Responsible Leadership

Source: Source: (Frontier, n.d)

Appendix 2: Stakeholder Role

Source: Source: MDPI (2023)

16
Word Count: 2563

Appendix 3: Stakeholder Theory

Source: Jansson (2005)

17