Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

100% found this document useful (1 vote)
121 views1 page

Case Digest For March 2023

This case involves a dispute over ownership of a parcel of land between the Valenzuela plaintiffs and defendant spouses Pabilani and Mattingly. The Valenzuelas claim ownership based on a tax declaration while the defendants claim ownership based on adverse possession for over 30 years. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the defendants, finding they had adversely possessed the property for more than the required 30 years.

Uploaded by

Philip Ameling
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
121 views1 page

Case Digest For March 2023

This case involves a dispute over ownership of a parcel of land between the Valenzuela plaintiffs and defendant spouses Pabilani and Mattingly. The Valenzuelas claim ownership based on a tax declaration while the defendants claim ownership based on adverse possession for over 30 years. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the defendants, finding they had adversely possessed the property for more than the required 30 years.

Uploaded by

Philip Ameling
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Emerson P. Valenzuela, Valentino P. Valenzuela, and Marty P. Valenzuela Vs. Sps.

Danilo Pabilani and


Eleonor Pabilani, Sps. Leticia and Joseph Mattingly
G.R. No. 241330. December 5, 2022 [Date Uploaded: 01/27/2023]

You might also like