0% found this document useful (0 votes)

216 views175 pages

Appendix 10 - Geotechnical Investigation Report

This report summarizes the results of a geotechnical investigation for a project in Jakarta Integration Base in KITIC, Deltamas, Bekasi, Indonesia. Site investigation included 4 boreholes up to 20 meters depth with standard penetration tests, sampling, and Dutch cone penetration tests. Laboratory tests on soil samples characterized physical and mechanical properties. The report presents soil profiles, laboratory results, and recommends shallow foundations and deep foundations (bored piles) for supporting structures at the site.

Uploaded by

Akcfa

We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.

Available Formats

Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

0% found this document useful (0 votes)

216 views175 pages

Appendix 10 - Geotechnical Investigation Report

Uploaded by

Akcfa

We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.

Available Formats

Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

You are on page 1/ 175

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT

JAKARTA INTERGRATION BASE PROJECT

KITIC, DELTAMAS - BEKASI

MAY, 2013

Geotechnical Investigation for Jakarta Integration Base Project i

KITIC, Deltamas - Bekasi
PREFACE

This report is geotechnical final report for Jakarta Integration Base Project at KITIC,

Deltamas, Bekasi. The investigation program involved not only an on-site geotechnical

investigation but also appropriate laboratory testing, primarily, to evaluate the physical and

mechanical properties of the ground.

In this report, we present not only the factual result of the geotechnical investigation but

also foundation recommendations for this project. This geotechnical investigation report

provided, we hope can serve the purpose for the Civil Consultants in designing the building

structure will be built at the investigated area.

And most importantly, we express our thanks to the client trusting us to carry out this

assignment.

Bandung, May 2013

PT. CND Geoteknika

Cindarto L., MSc.

Geotechnical Engineer

Geotechnical Investigation for Jakarta Integration Base Project i

KITIC, Deltamas - Bekasi
PT. Schlumberger Geophysics Nusantara
Jakarta Integration Base Project, KITIC, Delta Mas, Bekasi, Indonesia

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 General ........................................................................................................................ 1
1.2 Objective ...................................................................................................................... 1
1.3 Scope of Work.............................................................................................................. 1
1.4 Project location............................................................................................................. 2

2.0 SITE INVESTIGATION .......................................................................................................... 3

2.1 General ........................................................................................................................ 3
2.2 Method of SITE Investigation ....................................................................................... 5
2.2.1 Core Drilling ................................................................................................................. 5
2.2.2 Standard Penetration Test (SPT) ................................................................................. 5
2.2.3 Undisturbed Soil Sampling ........................................................................................... 6
2.2.4 Dutch Cone Penetration Test (DCPT) .......................................................................... 7
2.3 Method of Laboratory test ............................................................................................ 8
2.3.1 Specific Gravity ............................................................................................................ 8
2.3.2 Moisture Content .......................................................................................................... 8
2.3.3 Particle Size Analysis ................................................................................................... 9
2.3.4 Atterberg Limits .......................................................................................................... 10
2.3.5 Triaxial Unconsolidated-Undrained (UU) Test ........................................................... 10
2.3.6 Direct Shear Test ....................................................................................................... 11
2.3.7 Consolidation Test ..................................................................................................... 12
2.3.8 Unconfined Compression Test ................................................................................................. 13

3.0 SOIL INVESTIGATION RESULT ......................................................................................... 13

3.1 Soil Investigation Data................................................................................................ 13
3.2 laboratory test result. .................................................................................................. 15

4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................................ 17

4.1 Shallow Foundation .................................................................................................... 17
4.2 Deep Foundation........................................................................................................ 17

REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................. 21

APPENDICES :

Appendix A : Location Map

Appendix B : Boring Log
Appendix B : Documentation
Appendix C : Laboratory Test Result
PT. Schlumberger Geophysics Nusantara
Jakarta Integration Base Project, KITIC, Delta Mas, Bekasi, Indonesia

LIST OF FIGURE

FIGURE 1. PROJECT LOCATION ........................................................................................................................................ 2

FIGURE 2. EQUIPMENT OF CORE DRILLING WORK ........................................................................................................... 5
FIGURE 3. SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM FOR SPT ...................................................................................................................... 6
FIGURE 4. THIN WALL TUBE SAMPLER ............................................................................................................................. 6
FIGURE 5. DCPT APPARATUS .......................................................................................................................................... 7
FIGURE 6. SPECIFIC GRAVITY TEST EQUIPMENT ............................................................................................................. 8
FIGURE 7. MOISTURE CONTENT TEST EQUIPMENT .......................................................................................................... 9
FIGURE 8. HYDROMETER AND SIEVES USED FOR GRADATION TEST. ................................................................................ 9
FIGURE 9. CASAGRANDE EQUIPMENT ........................................................................................................................... 10
FIGURE 10. PRINCIPAL DETAIL OF TRIAXIAL TEST (ASTM D4767) ............................................................................... 10
FIGURE 11. TRIAXIAL TEST EQUIPMENTS ....................................................................................................................... 11
FIGURE 12. PRINCIPAL DETAIL OF DIRECT SHEAR TEST ................................................................................................ 11
FIGURE 13. DIRECT SHEAR TEST EQUIPMENT ............................................................................................................... 12
FIGURE 14. PRINCIPAL DETAIL OF STANDARD CONSOLIDATION TEST ............................................................................ 12
FIGURE 15. STANDARD CONSOLIDATION TEST EQUIPMENT .......................................................................................... 13
FIGURE 16. SOIL PROFILE AT BH-1 TO BH-4 ................................................................................................................ 14
FIGURE 18. SKIN RESISTANCE IS NOT CALCULATED AT BORED PILE .............................................................................. 18
FIGURE 19. ULTIMATE SKIN RESISTANCE VS NSPT (WRIGHT, 1977) ........................................................................... 19
FIGURE 20. ULTIMATE END BEARING VS NSPT (REESE & WRIGHT, 1977) .................................................................. 20

LIST OF TABLE

TABLE 1. RESUME OF DRILLING WORK ............................................................................................................................ 3

TABLE 2. RESUME OF DUTCH CONE PENETRATION TEST ................................................................................................ 4
TABLE 3. SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS ................................................................................................... 15
TABLE 4. SWELLING POTENTIAL BASE ON PLASTICITY INDEX (HOLTZ AND GIBBS, 1956) ............................................. 16
TABLE 5. SUMMARY OF CHEMISTRY TEST RESULTS OF WATER FROM THE BOREHOLE .................................................. 16
TABLE 6. SUMMARY OF CHEMISTRY TEST RESULTS OF SOIL FROM THE BOREHOLE ...................................................... 16
TABLE 7. VERTICAL LOAD FOR LOW CAPACITY PILE ...................................................................................................... 17
TABLE 8. EMPIRICAL VALUES FOR UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (QU) ........................................................... 19
TABLE 9. AXIAL AND PULLOUT ALLOWABLE CAPACITY OF DEEP FOUNDATION .............................................................. 21
PT. Schlumberger Geophysics Nusantara
Jakarta Integration Base Project, KITIC, Delta Mas, Bekasi, Indonesia

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 GENERAL

PT. Schlumberger Geophysics Nusantara is currently considering developing Jakarta Integration

Base Project at KITIC, Delta Mas, Bekasi, West Jawa, Indonesia. The project site can be access
through Jakarta the capital city of Indonesia by car towards the East through Cikampek Toll road of
about 75 km.
PT. Schlumberger Geophysics Nusantara has appointed PT CND Geoteknika to undertake a
Geotechnical Investigation for the project development area.

1.2 OBJECTIVE

The main objective of the geotechnical investigation is to obtain sufficient geotechnical information
such as soil (and rock) physical and engineering properties.
The data obtained from this geotechnical investigation comprised but not limited to the followings:
Type of soil / rock
Index Properties and Shear Strength parameters
Ground water level
From the above information, it is expected that the designer will be able to design the foundation and
other related geotechnical structure at the development area.

1.3 SCOPE OF WORK

Geeotechnical investigation scope covers the following activities;

Site investigation
The site exploration stage includes in-situ testing, and collection of samples for laboratory
testing. The site investigation defines as follows:
• Core drilling
• Standard Penetration Test (SPT) at 2.0 m depth interval
• Dutch Cone Penetration Testing (DCPT)
• Undisturbed Soil sampling
• Groundwater level monitoring

Laboratory testing
Undisturbed samples have been collected during the drilling work and were taken to the soil
mechanic laboratory at Bandung, Indonesia for testing and analysis. Through these tests the
following index properties and mechanical properties of the soil samples were defined and
evaluated.
• Unit Weight Test
• Natural moisture content
• Atterberg limit test
• Particle size analysis
• Specific gravity
• Triaxial UU Compression test
• Triaxial CU Compression test
• Consolidation test
• Swelling test
• Unconfined Compression test on rock (hard soil)

Engineering Report
All field data and test results have been collected and geotechnical parameters of the site are
analyzed and to be used as basis for recommendations and conclusions.
All findings are documented in this Report form, which consist of:
• Preparation summary of test results
1
PT. Schlumberger Geophysics Nusantara
Jakarta Integration Base Project, KITIC, Delta Mas, Bekasi, Indonesia

• Interpretation of borehole data

• Engineering analysis and foundation recommendation

1.4 PROJECT LOCATION

The project site is located at KITIC, Delta Mas, Bekasi, West Jawa, Indonesia and approximately 75
km East of Jakarta, the capital city of Indonesia.

Figure 1. Project Location

2
PT. Schlumberger Geophysics Nusantara
Jakarta Integration Base Project, KITIC, Delta Mas, Bekasi, Indonesia

2.0 SITE INVESTIGATION

2.1 GENERAL

PT CND Geoteknika site investigation team arrived in KITIC in 16 April 2013. Prior to start the
investigation work, site observation and access assessment of the site investigation point were
carried out together with PT. Schlumberger Geophysics Nusantara representatives.
The site investigation program was completed on 5 May 2013 and total 4 deep boring points and 26
DCPT points have been executed at this expansion area. Resume of deep boring is shown at table 1.

Table 1 shows the summary of deep boring activities and the location of each deep boring can be
inspected in Appendix A..

Table 1. Resume of Drilling Work

Depth of Ground Water

Sample Depth
Point Core Drilling*) Level SPT Test
[meter]
[meter] [meter]
UDS : 1.50 – 2.00
UDS : 7.00 – 7.50
BH-1 30.00 -3.10 14 UDS : 11.00 – 11.50
DS : 21.00 – 21.50
DS : 27.00 – 27.50
UDS : 3.00 – 3.50
UDS : 7.50 – 8.00
UDS : 13.00 – 13.50
BH-2 30.00 -2.40 14
DS : 19.50 – 20.00
DS : 21.50 – 22.00
DS : 25.50 – 26.00
UDS : 1.00 – 1.50
UDS : 7.00 – 7.50
UDS : 11.50 – 12.00
BH-3 30.00 -2.40 14
UDS : 15.50 – 16.00
DS : 21.50 – 22.00
DS : 25.50 – 26.00
UDS : 3.50 – 4.00
UDS : 9.00 – 9.50
UDS : 13.50 – 14.00
BH-4 30.00 -2.50 14
DS : 19.0 – 19.50
DS : 23.50 – 24.00
DS : 27.50 – 28.00

Based on drilling work at BH-1 to BH-4, soil layer in this area is Clay with yellowish brown to grey
color. Soil consistency is very soft to soft at 0.00 – 4.00m, firm at 4.00 – 10.00 m and become stiff to
very hard at 10.00 - 30.00 m depth. Until finish drilling work, hard layer which indicated by SPT value
N > 50 is not found. But for cohesive soil, SPT Value with N>30 is included very hard consistency and
reside start 28.0 m.

3
PT. Schlumberger Geophysics Nusantara
Jakarta Integration Base Project, KITIC, Delta Mas, Bekasi, Indonesia

Ground Water is in 2.50 – 4.00 m depth from existing round level.

Table 2. Resume of Dutch Cone Penetration Test

Depth DCPT Depth

NO DCPT No qc>150 kg/cm² NO qc>150 kg/cm²
(m) no (m)
1 S-1 15.80 14 S-14 15.20
2 S-2 14.80 15 S-15 14.60
3 S-3 13.60 16 S-16 16.80
4 S-4 13.20 17 S-17 13.20
5 S-5 13.20 18 S-18 14.20
6 S-6 14.20 19 S-19 16.60
7 S-7 14.60 20 S-20 16.20
8 S-8 13.80 21 S-21 15.60
9 S-9 14.60 22 S-22 15.80
10 S-10 15.20 23 S-23 16.20
11 S-11 16.20 24 S-24 13.80
12 S-12 13.60 25 S-25 14.20
13 S-13 14.20 26 S-26 14.60

Note :
*) Depth of borehole, hard layer & ground water level measured from the existing ground elevation (refer to the topographical map)

4
PT. Schlumberger Geophysics Nusantara
Jakarta Integration Base Project, KITIC, Delta Mas, Bekasi, Indonesia

2.2 METHOD OF SITE INVESTIGATION

In order to meet the foregoing scope of works, following site investigation method has been adopted;

2.2.1 Core Drilling

Core drilling work was conducted by means of rotary drilling machine, down to maximum 30 meters
depth. Core drilling work procedure implemented follow ASTM D 1452-80, “Standard Practice for
Soil Investigation and Sampling ”, ASTM D 420 - 87, “Standard Guide for Investigating and
Sampling Soil and Rock”, ASTM D 2488 - 84, “Standard Practice for Description and Identification
of Soils (Visual-Manual Procedure)”, and ASTM D 2113 – 99, “Standard Practice for Rock Core
Drilling and Sampling of Rock for Site Investigation”.

Single tube core barrel with little amount of water was used when soil material was encountered.
Triple tube core barrel with diamond bit and circulated water was used when rock material was
encountered. The core obtained from the core barrel was extruded and carefully placed in the core
box for further geotechnical examination, logged and photographed. Representative rock cores were
also sampled for laboratory testing.

Figure 2. Equipment of Core Drilling Work

The data obtained during the drilling work was recorded in the field logs and includes the following:
project identification, boring number, location, orientation, date boring started, date boring completed,
and drillers name(s), elevation coordinates of the top of the borehole, soil classifications/ descriptions
(hardness, color, degree of weathering, and other pertinent identities), litho logic description,
groundwater level, soil and rock sampling, in-situ testing in borehole, etc.

2.2.2 Standard Penetration Test (SPT)

Standard Penetration Tests was performed in each boring locations every 3m depth interval.
Standard Penetration Test procedure and equipment follow ASTM D 1586 – 84, “Standard Method
for Penetration Test and Split Barrel Sampling of Soils”. The resistance of soil is represented by the
N-value. The number of blows of hammer striking drilling rod to cause 3x6” penetration of the split
spoon at the tip into the soil is counted. The total number of blows for the last 2x6” penetration is
called N – value. The test result recorded and presented in the boring log.

5
PT. Schlumberger Geophysics Nusantara
Jakarta Integration Base Project, KITIC, Delta Mas, Bekasi, Indonesia

Figure 3. Schematic diagram for SPT

2.2.3 Undisturbed Soil Sampling

The most important engineering properties required for sub-structure design are shear strength and
compressibility. Reasonably good estimates of these properties for cohesive soils can be made by
laboratory test on ‘undisturbed’ samples.
During the site investigation campaign, undisturbed sampling were taken from a specified depth by
using a Shelby tube sampler (a thin walled tube sampler). Although sample disturbance depends on
factors such as rate of penetration , whether the cutting force is obtained by pushing or driving, and
presence of gravel, it also depends on the ratio of the volume of soil displacement to the volume of
the collected sample, expressed as an area ratio, Ar;

Ar = (Do2 – Di2)/Di2

Where;
Do = outside diameter of tube
Di = inside diameter of tube

Well-designed sample tubes should have an area ratio of less than about 10%.
The Shelby tube sampler used in the field was made from black steel pipe with outer diameter,
Do = 73 mm and inner diameter, Di = 70 mm, the calculated area ratio,

Ar = 8.76% < 10% (OK)

In order to maintain the soil structure and physical composition to be as in original conditions, until it
is extruded to be tested in the laboratory, subsequently the soil sample tube was protected against
shock, vibration and change in moisture. Depth to top of sample and the length of sampler was
recorded in the field log and later presented in boring log.

Figure 4. Thin Wall Tube Sampler

6
PT. Schlumberger Geophysics Nusantara
Jakarta Integration Base Project, KITIC, Delta Mas, Bekasi, Indonesia

2.2.4 Dutch Cone Penetration Test (DCPT)

The test follows the procedure described in ASTM D 3441, in this test a mechanical 60 degrees cone
with cross sectional area of 10 cm² is forced into the ground at reasonably constant rate. Provision
were made to measure independently the cone resistance (qc), and the resistance due to the skin
friction (fs).
The test utilizes the Begemann biconus type with 2.5 ton capacity. Cone resistance and skin friction
reading were directly read from the manometer gauge. Readings and observations were noted every
20 cm of penetration interval. The rate of penetration is around 1.0 to 2.0 cm/sec adhering to the
ASTM D 3341 standard. A manometer reading of more than 200 kg/cm² terminated the testing
process. The test results are provided in graphical form as DCPT graphs.
The measurement of penetration depth start from the existing ground surface whwere the test
isexecuted. The test is carried out to a maximum depth of 20 m, but the test will be terminated when
2
the cone resistance (qc) reading equal or exceeding 200 kg/cm .

Gear Box

Tuas Pemutar

Anchor

Oil Valve

Manometer

Figure 5. DCPT Apparatus

7
PT. Schlumberger Geophysics Nusantara
Jakarta Integration Base Project, KITIC, Delta Mas, Bekasi, Indonesia

2.3 METHOD OF LABORATORY TEST

The undisturbed soil samples and rock core samples collected were send to the soil mechanics
laboratory for testing in Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.
The following are the method of laboratory tests adopted for testing of soil and rock sample obtained
during the site investigation;

2.3.1 Specific Gravity

The specific gravity of soil, Gs, is defined as the ratio of the mass in air of a given volume of soil
particles to the mass in air of an equal volume of gas free distilled water at a stated temperature
(typically 68° F {20° C}). The specific gravity is determined by means of a calibrated pycnometer, by
which the mass and temperature of a de-aired soil/distilled water sample is measured.

Test is performed in accordance with ASTM D 854. This method is used for soil samples composed
of particles less than the No. 4 sieve (4.75 mm). For particles larger than this sieve, use the
procedures for Specific Gravity and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate (ASTM C 127). The specific
gravity of soils is needed to relate a weight of soil to its volume, and it is used in the computations of
other laboratory tests.

Figure 6. Specific Gravity Test Equipment

2.3.2 Moisture Content

The moisture content, w, is defined as the ratio of the weight of water in a sample to the weight of
solids. The wet sample is weighed, and then oven-dried to a constant weight at a temperature of
about 230° F (110° C). The weight after drying is the weight of solids. The change in weight, which
has occurred during drying, is equivalent to the weight of water. For organic soils, a reduced drying
temperature of approximately 140° F (60° C) is sometimes recommended.

Tests is performed in accordance with ASTM D 2216. The moisture content is valuable in
determining the properties of soils and can be correlated with other parameters.

8
PT. Schlumberger Geophysics Nusantara
Jakarta Integration Base Project, KITIC, Delta Mas, Bekasi, Indonesia

Figure 7. Moisture Content Test Equipment

2.3.3 Particle Size Analysis

This test is performed in two stages: sieve analysis for coarse-grained soils (sands, gravels) and
hydrometer analysis for fine-grained soils (clays, silts). Soils containing both types are tested in
sequence, with the material passing the No. 200 sieve (0.075 mm or smaller) analyzed by
hydrometer.

Sieve analysis test provides a direct measurement of the particle size distribution of a soil by causing
the sample to pass through a series of wire screens with progressively smaller openings of known
size. The amount of material retained on each sieve is weighed. See ASTM C 136.

Hydrometer test is performed based on Stokes Law. The diameter of a soil particle is defined as the
diameter of a sphere which has the same unit mass and which falls at the same velocity as the
particle. Thus, a particle size distribution is obtained by using a hydrometer to measure the change in
specific gravity of a soil-water suspension as soil particles settle out over time.

Results are reported on a combined grain size distribution plot as the percentage of sample smaller
than, by weight, versus the log of the particle diameter. These data are necessary for a complete
classification of the soil. The curve also provides other parameters, such as effective diameter (D10)
and coefficient of uniformity (Cu). Tests will be performed in accordance with ASTM D 422 and
ASTM D 1140 – 00.

Figure 8. Hydrometer and sieves used for gradation test.

9
PT. Schlumberger Geophysics Nusantara
Jakarta Integration Base Project, KITIC, Delta Mas, Bekasi, Indonesia

2.3.4 Atterberg Limits

The liquid limit is determined by ascertaining the moisture content at which two halves of a soil cake
will flow together for a distance of 0.5 inch (13 mm) along the bottom of the groove separating the
halves, when the bowl they are in is dropped 25 times for a distance of 0.4 inches (10 mm) at the rate
of 2 drops/second. Tests will be performed in accordance with ASTM D 4318.

The plastic limit is determined by ascertaining the lowest moisture content at which the material can
be rolled into threads 0.125 inches (3.2 mm) in diameter without crumbling. This test is performed in
accordance with ASTM D 4318.
The shrinkage limit (SL) is defined as the maximum water content at which a reduction in water
content will not cause a decrease in volume of the soil mass. Test is performed in accordance with
ASTM D 427.
These values are useful in soil classification and have been correlated with other parameters.

Figure 9. Casagrande Equipment

2.3.5 Triaxial Unconsolidated-Undrained (UU) Test

In this test the specimen is not permitted to change its initial water content before or during shear.
The results are total stress parameters. This test is used primarily in the calculation of immediate
embankment stability during quick-loading conditions. This triaxial test is performed in accordance
with ASTM D 2850.

Figure 10. Principal detail of Triaxial Test (ASTM D4767)

10
PT. Schlumberger Geophysics Nusantara
Jakarta Integration Base Project, KITIC, Delta Mas, Bekasi, Indonesia

Figure 11. Triaxial Test Equipments

2.3.6 Direct Shear Test

The direct shear test is one of the oldest strength tests for soils. In this laboratory, a direct shear
device will be used to determine the shear strength of a soil (c & φ). From the plot of the shear stress
versus the horizontal displacement, the maximum shear stress is obtained for a specific vertical
confining stress. After the experiment is run several times for various vertical-confining stresses, a
plot of the maximum shear stresses versus the vertical (normal) confining stresses for each of the
tests is produced. From the plot, a straight-line approximation of the Mohr-Coulomb failure envelope
curve can be drawn, may be determined, and, for cohesionless soils (c = 0), the shear strength can
be computed from the following equation: σ = σ tan φ
Tests are performed in accordance with ASTM D 3080.
For UU condition (Unconsolidated Undrained), before test started, the specimen is not permitted to
change its initial water content before or during shear. The results are total stress parameters. And
for CU condition, the specimens are consolidated and sheared in compression without drainage at a
constant rate of axial deformation (strain controlled).

Figure 12. Principal detail of Direct Shear Test

11
PT. Schlumberger Geophysics Nusantara
Jakarta Integration Base Project, KITIC, Delta Mas, Bekasi, Indonesia

Figure 13. Direct Shear Test Equipment

2.3.7 Consolidation Test

The most often used method of consolidation testing is the one-dimensional test. In this test, a
specimen is placed in a consolidometer (odometer) between two porous stones, which permit
drainage. Various loading procedures can be used during a one-dimensional test with incremental
loading being the most common. With this procedure the specimen is subjected to increasing loads,
usually beginning at approximately 1/16 tsf (5 kPa) and doubling each increment up to 16 tsf (1600
kPa). After each load application the change in sample height is monitored incrementally for,
generally, 24 hours. To evaluate the recompression parameters of the sample, an unload/reload
cycle can be performed during the loading schedule. To better evaluate the recompression
parameters for over consolidated clays, the unload/reload cycle may be performed after the
preconsolidation pressure has been defined. After the maximum loading has been reached, the
loading is removed in decrements. Tests will be performed in accordance with ASTM D 2435.
The data from a consolidation test is presented on an e-log p curve, which plots void ratio (e) as a
function of the log of pressure (p), or a ε-log p curve where ε equals % strain. The parameters
necessary for settlement calculation can be derived from these curves: compression index (Cc),
recompression index (Cr), preconsolidation pressure (Po or Pc) and initial void ratio (eo).
For Swelling Test the same apparatus was used. The procedure follow ASTM D 4546.

Figure 14. Principal detail of Standard Consolidation Test

12
PT. Schlumberger Geophysics Nusantara
Jakarta Integration Base Project, KITIC, Delta Mas, Bekasi, Indonesia

Figure 15. Standard Consolidation Test Equipment

2.3.8 Unconfined Compression Test

The unconfined compression test of a soil is a uniaxial compression test in which the test specimen
is provided with no lateral confining pressure while undergoing vertical compression. The test
measures the unconfined compressive strength of a cylinder of cohesive or semi cohesive soil or rock
core, indirectly, may be the indicative of shearing strength.
Tests are performed in accordance with ASTM D 2166 for cohesive soil and ASTM D2938 for rock
core.

3.0 SOIL INVESTIGATION RESULT

3.1 SOIL INVESTIGATION DATA

This section will discuss about the soil investigation data obtained at the site investigation location.
Based on deep boring work, soil description and SPT value for each point as shown at figure bellow,
it was known that the sub-soil found at the investigated area is predominantly clay of very high
plasticity (LL > 50%). Very soft to hard with increasing depth. SPTN gradually change from 2 to 33.
Until maximum depth of boring 30 m, there is no bed rock layer with SPT N > 50 encountered.
The ground water level was found at 3.20 to 3.50 m depth.

13
PT. Schlumberger Geophysics Nusantara
Jakarta Integration Base Project, KITIC, Delta Mas, Bekasi, Indonesia

Figure 16. Soil Profile at BH-1 to BH-4

14
PT. Schlumberger Geophysics Nusantara
Jakarta Integration Base Project, KITIC, Delta Mas, Bekasi, Indonesia

3.2 LABORATORY TEST RESULT.

Based on testing method at the point 2.3, the following table shown the resume soil parameters for all soil samples tested
Table 3. Summary of Laboratory Test Results
Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limit Unconfined
Water Unit Specific Consolidation Triaxial UU TX CU Direct Shear
Depth Content Weight Gravity Compression
Sample no. (wn) (γn) (Gs) Clay Silt Sand Gravel WL WP IP
eo Cv Cc qu Φ C Φ C Φ' C' Φ C
3 2 o 2 o 2 o 2 o
(m) (%) ( t/m ) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) - cm /sec - kPa ( ) (kN/m ) ( ) (kg/m ) ( ) (kg/m ) ( ) (kg/cm2)

1.50-2.00 56.03 1.51 2.61 96 0 3 1 106 30 76 1.4764 4.50E-03 0.5256 - 0.0 7.4 - - - - - -

7.00-7.50 39.76 1.69 2.60 83 9 8 0 93 34 59 0.9448 1.62E-02 0.2423 - - - 10.86 0.12 11.38 0.09 - -

11.00-11.50 50.01 1.56 2.60 83 11 6 0 101 34 67 1.2467 1.05E-02 0.2616 - 0.7 79.0 - - - - 13.65 0.380
BH-1
17.50-18.00 38.38 1.86 2.70 99 1 0 0 98 28 70 - - - 245.91 - - - - - - - -

21.00-21.50 45.89 1.74 - - - - - - - - - - - 212.54 - - - - - - - -

27.00-27.50 41.21 1.79 - - - - - - - - - - - 290.21 - - - - - - - -

3.00-3.50 66.12 1.43 2.65 70 20 9 1 112 35 77 1.9163 9.24E-03 0.6348 - - - 0.19 4.04 0.16 4.98 - -

7.50-8.00 57.37 1.51 2.67 99 0 1 0 113 30 83 1.4755 6.89E-03 0.4292 - 8.8 21.0 - - - - - -

13.00-13.50 44.18 1.83 2.60 99 1 0 0 112 30 83 - - - 270.32 - - - - - - - -

BH-2
19.50-20.00 45.69 1.82 - - - - - - - - - - - 221.78 - - - - - - - -

21.50-22.00 42.35 1.71 - - - - - - - - - - - 290.63 - - - - - - - -

25.50-26.00 39.93 1.62 - - - - - - - - - - - 283.66 - - - - - - - -

1.00-1.50 58.18 1.70 2.51 80 14 6 0 103 34 70 1.4203 8.63E-03 0.4020 - 7.6 12.0 - - - - - -

7.00-7.50 53.01 1.52 2.61 93 1 6 0 108 33 75 1.4288 1.09E-02 0.4662 - - - 8.94 0.24 9.37 0.21 - -

11.50-12.00 46.77 1.73 2.63 99 1 0 0 111 32 79 1.2235 5.73E-03 0.2652 - 3.5 86.0 - - - - - -
BH-3
15.50-16.00 46.34 1.74 2.68 98 2 0 0 113 33 79 - - - - 3.8 98.0 - - - - 16.49 0.400

21.50-22.00 39.50 - - - - - - - - - - - - 203.86 - - - - - - - -

25.50-26.00 41.02 - - - - - - - - - - - - 341.05 - - - - - - - -

3.50-4.00 57.60 1.73 2.72 98 0 2 0 112 35 77 1.5928 6.47E-03 0.5170 - 3.4 19.5 - - - - - -

9.00-9.50 44.25 1.81 2.63 99 0 1 0 113 34 79 1.1372 9.21E-03 0.3361 - 10.6 55.0 - - - - - -

13.50-14.00 45.00 1.71 2.62 100 0 0 0 106 33 72 - - - - - - - - - - 15.24 0.350

BH-4
19.00-19.50 50.35 - - - - - - - - - - - - 86.72 - - - - - - - -

23.50-24.00 44.85 1.79 - - - - - - - - - - - 153.50 - - - - - - - -

27.50-28.00 42.62 - - - - - - - - - - - - 244.88 - - - - - - - -

15
PT. Schlumberger Geophysics Nusantara
Jakarta Integration Base Project, KITIC, Delta Mas, Bekasi, Indonesia

Holtz and Gibbs (1956) demonstrated that plasticity index and liquid limit are useful indices for
determining the swelling characteristics of most clays.
Since liquid limit and swelling of clays both depend on the amount of water a clay tries to imbibe, it is
not surprising that they are related.

Table 4. Swelling Potential base on Plasticity Index (Holtz and Gibbs, 1956)

Swelling Potential Plasiticity Index, %

Low 0 – 15
Medium 10 – 35
High 35 – 55
Very High 55 and above

The following are the results of swelling test carried out on the undisturbed sample;
Plasticity Index = 59 – 83 %

It can be concluded that the soil found at the investigated area, KITIC, Delta Mas has Very High
Swelling Potensial.
Further swelling test have been carried out on the collected undusturbed soil sample, the swelling
pressure of the expansive soil is ranging from 5.5 to 8.5 t/m2.

Soil and Water sample from each borehole were tested for pH, Chloride and Sulfate content, and the
following table 5 and 6 summarized the test results.

Table 5. Summary of Chemistry Test Results of water from the borehole

Borehole No. GWL (m) pH Chloride, Cl (%) Sulfate, SO4 (%)

BH-1 3.20 m 4.00 0.0053 0.2910
BH-2 3.20 m 6.58 0.0337 0.9107
BH-3 3.40 m 5.88 0.0028 0.1448
BH-4 3.50 m 4.41 0.0021 0.1228

Table 6. Summary of Chemistry Test Results of soil from the borehole

Borehole No. Depth (m) pH Chloride, Cl (%) Sulfate, SO4 (%)

BH-1 7.00 m 4.86 0.0071 0.0247
BH-2 13.00 m 10.36 0.0085 0.0487
BH-3 21.50 m 10.52 0.0078 0.0237
BH-4 27.50 m 10.43 0.0099 0.0226
PT. Schlumberger Geophysics Nusantara
Jakarta Integration Base Project, KITIC, Delta Mas, Bekasi, Indonesia

4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

4.1 Shallow Foundation

Because the presence of highly expansive clay material through out the development area, significant
volume chane during dry and wet season shall be anticipated, it is not recommended to employ
shallow foundation for any structure founded on the existing soil.
To support relatively light building, ie. fence column, friction pile with minimum length of 6 m can be
used (extending beyond the depth of water level). The pile can be precast reinforced concrete , either
square 20 x 20 cm or delta 28 x 28 x 28 cm,driven or hydraulically pushed into the ground.

Axial compression capacity for driven pile can be estimated by using Meyerhoff formula (1956);

Qu = 40 Nb . Ap + 0.2 Ns . As

Where :
Qu = the ultimate pile capacity (ton)
Nb = SPT value at the base of pile, Nb max = 40
Ap = Area of pile tip (m²)
As = Perimeter pile (m²)
Ns = SPT value along the pile embedded
0.2N = 10 ton/m² (maximum)
By employing Nb = 0 and Ns = 5 , The estimated vertical load capacity of those pile are as follows;
Table 7. Vertical Load for Low Capacity Pile

Type Pile Length Allowable Vertical Load

Square Pile 20 x 20 cm 6m 1.6 ton

Delta Pile 28 x 28 x 28 cm 6m 1.5 ton

4.2 Deep Foundation

Deep foundation is adopted to assure the buildings load was safely supported. The following are
general condition where deep foundation is required;:
There is significant thickness of soft and compressible soil layer at the near ground surface
The structure has to resist lateral load
The structure has to resist uplift or tension load
Design parameter for estimating deep foundation bearing capacity are obtained from geotechnical
investigation program, ie. SPT which can be utilized as good as the laboratory test results;

Driven Pile Axial Load Capacity

Axial Compression Pile Capacity for Precast Pile, Meyerhoff (1956) suggest the formula bearing
capacity for precast pile is :

Qu = 40 Nb . Ap + 0.2 Ns . As

Where :
Qu = the ultimate pile capacity (ton)
Nb = SPT value at the base of pile, Nb max = 40
Ap = Area of pile tip (m²)
As = Perimeter pile (m²)
Ns = SPT value along the pile embedded
0.2N = 10 ton/m² (maximum)
PT. Schlumberger Geophysics Nusantara
Jakarta Integration Base Project, KITIC, Delta Mas, Bekasi, Indonesia

Bored Pile Axial Load Capacity

Qu = Qp + Qs
Allowable Nearing capacity :
Qa = Qp / FKs +Qs / FKt
Where :
Qp = End Bearing (ton)
Qs = Skin Resistance (ton
FKs = Safety Factor for End Bearing
FKt = Safety Factor for Skin Resistance

Skin Resistance Capacity

Skin Resistance Capacity’s formula :
Qs = fs x L x P
Where :
fs = skin friction for unit length (ton/m²)
L = length of pile (m)
P = pile perimeter (m)

Skin Resistance for Cohesive Soil

fs = ca = α cu
ca = adhesion
cu = undrained shear strength
0 -5 ft (0-1.5 m) from top of pile
“underreamed” shaft + diameter of pile → enlarged base bored pile
Diameter of pile → straight shaft bored pile
1.50 m

1.50 m
Bs
Bs

Bs Bs

Figure 17. Skin Resistance is not calculated at bored pile

Skin Resistance for non-Cohesive Soil

For non-cohesive soil, skin resistance, fs is obtained from SPT-fs graphic (after Reese and
Wright,1977).
PT. Schlumberger Geophysics Nusantara
Jakarta Integration Base Project, KITIC, Delta Mas, Bekasi, Indonesia

3.0

ULTIMATE SKIN FRICTION (kg/cm2)

2.0

1.0

0
0 20 40 60 80 100
NSPT
Figure 18. Ultimate Skin Resistance vs NSPT (Wright, 1977)

End Bearing Capacity

End Bearing capacity’s formula:
Qp = qt . At
Where :
qt = end bearing capacity per area end tip (ton/m²)
At = end tip area (m²)

End Bearing Capacity for Cohesive Soil

For cu ≥ 96 kPa and depth of base foundation ≥ 3 x pile diameter
qt = 9 cu
For cu ≤ 96 kPa and depth of base foundation ≥ 3 x pile diameter
qt = cu . Nc*
Value of Nc* is: cu ≤ 24Pa Nc*=6.5
24 ≤ cu ≤ 48 Nc*=8.0
cu ≥ 96 kPa Nc*=9.0

For depth of base foundation ≥ 3 x pile diameter

2⎛ 1 D⎞
q t = ⎜1+ ⎟ Nc * .cu
3⎝ 6 B⎠
cu = ½ qu
Value of qu based on SPT see table 4.1 (Design and Construction of Driven Pile Foundation,
U.S. Department of Commerce, Jan 97)

Table 8. Empirical values for unconfined compressive strength (qu) and consistency of cohesive soils
based on uncorrected N (Bowles,1977)

Consistency Very Soft Soft Medium Stiff Very Stiff Hard

qu, kPa 0 - 24 24 - 48 48 – 96 96 - 192 192 – 384 > 384

NSPT 0-2 2-4 4–8 8 - 16 16 - 32 > 32

γ
(saturated) 15.8 – 18.8 15.8 – 18.8 17.3 – 20.4 18.8 – 22.0 18.8 – 22.0 18.8 – 22.0
kN/m3

The undrained shear strentgh is ½ of the Unconfined compressive strength

PT. Schlumberger Geophysics Nusantara
Jakarta Integration Base Project, KITIC, Delta Mas, Bekasi, Indonesia

End Bearing Capacity of non cohesive soil

Ultimate end bearing capacity of non cohesive soil can be estimated by using SPT value according to
Reese & Wright graph;
50

ULTIMATE END BEARING CAPACITY

0
0 20 40 60 80 100
NSPT

Figure 19. Ultimate End Bearing vs NSPT (Reese & Wright, 1977)

Axial Tension Capacity

The design of piles for uplift loading conditions has become increasingly important for structures
subject to dynamic loading. In some cases, the uplift capacity of pile determines the minimum pile
penetration requirements.
Nicola and Randolph (1993) note that in fine-grained cohesive soils, where loading is assumed to
occur under un-drained conditions, the shaft resistance is generally considered equal in compression
and in uplift. Whereas in non-cohesive or free draining soils, Nicola and Randolph (1993) state that it
has been customary to assume that the shaft resistance in uplift is approximately 70% of the shaft
resistance in compression.

Allowable Pile Capacity (Pall)

Allowable axial and tension load capacity can be estimated by the following formula;:
Qs
Qall =
SF
SF = 3

The following table summarized the recommended deep foundation type and its recommended
vertical and lateral capacity for different dimension of pile.
PT. Schlumberger Geophysics Nusantara
Jakarta Integration Base Project, KITIC, Delta Mas, Bekasi, Indonesia

Table 9. Axial and Pullout Allowable Capacity of Deep Foundation

Dimension Length of Pile P-axial P-tension

Jenis Tiang
(mm) L (m) (ton) (ton)
250 28 39 20

L
300 28 50 25
Concrete Square Pile 400 28 76 36
D
450 28 91 41
500 28 107 48
300 28 39 20
350 28 49 24
Concrete Spun Pile 400 28 60 28
450 28 72 33
500 28 84 37
Concrete Triangle Pile 280 28 26 15
320 28 32 17
300 28 22 5
Bored Pile 400 28 35 7
500 28 52 9
600 28 71 11

REFERENCES

1. Bowles, J. E. (1988), “Foundation Analysis and Design”, McGraw-Hill, Singapore.

2. M. J. Tomlinson CEng,FICE (2001), Foundation Design and Construction 7th Edition, Pearson Prentice
Hall, Malaysia.
3. Carter & Bentley (1990), “Correlations of Soil Properties”, Pentech Press, London.
4. Das, B. M. (1984), “Principles of Foundation Engineering”, Brooks/Cole Engineering Division, California.
5. Karl Terzaghi and Ralph B. Peck (1967), “Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice, 2nd edition. John Wiley
& Sons. Inc.
6. N.E. Simons and B. K. Menzies (1977), “A Short Course in Foundation Engineering”, The English
language Book Society and Newnes-Butterworths.
APPENDIX A
LOCATION MAP
APPENDIX B
BORING LOG
APPENDIX C
DUTCH CONE PENETRATION TEST
DUTCH CONE PENETRATION TEST

Project : Jakarta Integration Base Project Test No. : S-1

Location : KITIC, Deltamas - Bekasi Tested by : Ade Cs
Date : 27 April 2013

0 50 100 150 200 250 0 3 6 9 12 15

0 0

1 1

2 2

3 3

4 4

5 5

6 6

7 7

8 8

9 9
Depth (m)
Depth (m)

10 10

11 11

12 12

13 13

14 14

15 15

16 16

17 17

18 18

19 19

20 20
Friction Ratio (%)
0 240 480 720 960 1200
qc (kg/cm²)
Cummulative Friction (kg/cm)
DUTCH CONE PENETRATION TEST

Project : Jakarta Integration Base Project Test No. : S-2

Location : KITIC, Deltamas - Bekasi Tested by : Ade Cs
Date : 27 April 2013

0 50 100 150 200 250 0 2 4 6 8 10

0 0

1 1

2 2

3 3

4 4

5 5

6 6

7 7

8 8

9 9
Depth (m)
Depth (m)

10 10

11 11

12 12

13 13

14 14

15 15

16 16

17 17

18 18

19 19

20 20
Friction Ratio (%)
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
qc (kg/cm²)
Cummulative Friction (kg/cm)
DUTCH CONE PENETRATION TEST

Project : Jakarta Integration Base Project Test No. : S-3

Location : KITIC, Deltamas - Bekasi Tested by : Ade Cs
Date : 27 April 2013

0 50 100 150 200 250 0 2 4 6 8 10

0 0

1 1

2 2

3 3

4 4

5 5

6 6

7 7

8 8

9 9
Depth (m)
Depth (m)

10 10

11 11

12 12

13 13

14 14

15 15

16 16

17 17

18 18

19 19

20 20
Friction Ratio (%)
0 300 600 900 1200 1500
qc (kg/cm²)
Cummulative Friction (kg/cm)
DUTCH CONE PENETRATION TEST

Project : Jakarta Integration Base Project Test No. : S-4

Location : KITIC, Deltamas - Bekasi Tested by : Ade Cs
Date : 27 April 2013

0 50 100 150 200 250 0 2 4 6 8 10

0 0

1 1

2 2

3 3

4 4

5 5

6 6

7 7

8 8

9 9
Depth (m)
Depth (m)

10 10

11 11

12 12

13 13

14 14

15 15

16 16

17 17

18 18

19 19

20 20
Friction Ratio (%)
0 360 720 1080 1440 1800
qc (kg/cm²)
Cummulative Friction (kg/cm)
DUTCH CONE PENETRATION TEST

Project : Jakarta Integration Base Project Test No. : S-5

Location : KITIC, Deltamas - Bekasi Tested by : Ade Cs
Date : 28 April 2013

0 50 100 150 200 250 0 2 4 6 8 10

0 0

1 1

2 2

3 3

4 4

5 5

6 6

7 7

8 8

9 9
Depth (m)
Depth (m)

10 10

11 11

12 12

13 13

14 14

15 15

16 16

17 17

18 18

19 19

20 20
Friction Ratio (%)
0 240 480 720 960 1200
qc (kg/cm²)
Cummulative Friction (kg/cm)
DUTCH CONE PENETRATION TEST

Project : Jakarta Integration Base Project Test No. : S-6

Location : KITIC, Deltamas - Bekasi Tested by : Ade Cs
Date : 28 April 2013

0 50 100 150 200 250 0 3 6 9 12 15

0 0

1 1

2 2

3 3

4 4

5 5

6 6

7 7

8 8

9 9
Depth (m)
Depth (m)

10 10

11 11

12 12

13 13

14 14

15 15

16 16

17 17

18 18

19 19

20 20
Friction Ratio (%)
0 260 520 780 1040 1300
qc (kg/cm²)
Cummulative Friction (kg/cm)
DUTCH CONE PENETRATION TEST

Project : Jakarta Integration Base Project Test No. : S-7

Location : KITIC, Deltamas - Bekasi Tested by : Ade Cs
Date : 24 April 2013

0 50 100 150 200 250 0 3 6 9 12 15

0 0

1 1

2 2

3 3

4 4

5 5

6 6

7 7

8 8

9 9
Depth (m)
Depth (m)

10 10

11 11

12 12

13 13

14 14

15 15

16 16

17 17

18 18

19 19

20 20
Friction Ratio (%)
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
qc (kg/cm²)
Cummulative Friction (kg/cm)
DUTCH CONE PENETRATION TEST

Project : Jakarta Integration Base Project Test No. : S-8

Location : KITIC, Deltamas - Bekasi Tested by : Ade Cs
Date : 28 April 2013

0 50 100 150 200 250 0 2 4 6 8 10

0 0

1 1

2 2

3 3

4 4

5 5

6 6

7 7

8 8

9 9
Depth (m)
Depth (m)

10 10

11 11

12 12

13 13

14 14

15 15

16 16

17 17

18 18

19 19

20 20
Friction Ratio (%)
0 240 480 720 960 1200
qc (kg/cm²)
Cummulative Friction (kg/cm)
DUTCH CONE PENETRATION TEST

Project : Jakarta Integration Base Project Test No. : S-9

Location : KITIC, Deltamas - Bekasi Tested by : Ade Cs
Date : 26 April 2013

0 50 100 150 200 250 0 2 4 6 8 10

0 0

1 1

2 2

3 3

4 4

5 5

6 6

7 7

8 8

9 9
Depth (m)
Depth (m)

10 10

11 11

12 12

13 13

14 14

15 15

16 16

17 17

18 18

19 19

20 20
Friction Ratio (%)
0 360 720 1080 1440 1800
qc (kg/cm²)
Cummulative Friction (kg/cm)
DUTCH CONE PENETRATION TEST

Project : Jakarta Integration Base Project Test No. : S-10

Location : KITIC, Deltamas - Bekasi Tested by : Ade Cs
Date : 24 April 2013

0 50 100 150 200 250 0 2 4 6 8 10

0 0

1 1

2 2

3 3

4 4

5 5

6 6

7 7

8 8

9 9
Depth (m)
Depth (m)

10 10

11 11

12 12

13 13

14 14

15 15

16 16

17 17

18 18

19 19

20 20
Friction Ratio (%)
0 340 680 1020 1360 1700
qc (kg/cm²)
Cummulative Friction (kg/cm)
DUTCH CONE PENETRATION TEST

Project : Jakarta Integration Base Project Test No. : S-11

Location : KITIC, Deltamas - Bekasi Tested by : Ade Cs
Date : 22 April 2013

0 50 100 150 200 250 0 4 8 12 16

0 0

1 1

2 2

3 3

4 4

5 5

6 6

7 7

8 8

9 9
Depth (m)
Depth (m)

10 10

11 11

12 12

13 13

14 14

15 15

16 16

17 17

18 18

19 19

20 20
Friction Ratio (%)
0 260 520 780 1040 1300
qc (kg/cm²)
Cummulative Friction (kg/cm)
DUTCH CONE PENETRATION TEST

Project : Jakarta Integration Base Project Test No. : S-12

Location : KITIC, Deltamas - Bekasi Tested by : Ade Cs
Date : 25 April 2013

0 50 100 150 200 250 0 2 4 6 8 10

0 0

1 1

2 2

3 3

4 4

5 5

6 6

7 7

8 8

9 9
Depth (m)
Depth (m)

10 10

11 11

12 12

13 13

14 14

15 15

16 16

17 17

18 18

19 19

20 20
Friction Ratio (%)
0 380 760 1140 1520 1900
qc (kg/cm²)
Cummulative Friction (kg/cm)
DUTCH CONE PENETRATION TEST

Project : Jakarta Integration Base Project Test No. : S-13

Location : KITIC, Deltamas - Bekasi Tested by : Ade Cs
Date : 25 April 2013

0 50 100 150 200 250 0 2 4 6 8 10

0 0

1 1

2 2

3 3

4 4

5 5

6 6

7 7

8 8

9 9
Depth (m)
Depth (m)

10 10

11 11

12 12

13 13

14 14

15 15

16 16

17 17

18 18

19 19

20 20
Friction Ratio (%)
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
qc (kg/cm²)
Cummulative Friction (kg/cm)
DUTCH CONE PENETRATION TEST

Project : Jakarta Integration Base Project Test No. : S-14

Location : KITIC, Deltamas - Bekasi Tested by : Ade Cs
Date : 24 April 2013

0 50 100 150 200 250 0 3 6 9 12

0 0

1 1

2 2

3 3

4 4

5 5

6 6

7 7

8 8

9 9
Depth (m)
Depth (m)

10 10

11 11

12 12

13 13

14 14

15 15

16 16

17 17

18 18

19 19

20 20
Friction Ratio (%)
0 360 720 1080 1440 1800
qc (kg/cm²)
Cummulative Friction (kg/cm)
DUTCH CONE PENETRATION TEST

Project : Jakarta Integration Base Project Test No. : S-15

Location : KITIC, Deltamas - Bekasi Tested by : Ade Cs
Date : 23 April 2013

0 50 100 150 200 250 0 2 4 6 8 10

0 0

1 1

2 2

3 3

4 4

5 5

6 6

7 7

8 8

9 9
Depth (m)
Depth (m)

10 10

11 11

12 12

13 13

14 14

15 15

16 16

17 17

18 18

19 19

20 20
Friction Ratio (%)
0 280 560 840 1120 1400
qc (kg/cm²)
Cummulative Friction (kg/cm)
DUTCH CONE PENETRATION TEST

Project : Jakarta Integration Base Project Test No. : S-16

Location : KITIC, Deltamas - Bekasi Tested by : Ade Cs
Date : 23 April 2013

0 50 100 150 200 250 0 3 6 9 12

0 0

1 1

2 2

3 3

4 4

5 5

6 6

7 7

8 8

9 9
Depth (m)
Depth (m)

10 10

11 11

12 12

13 13

14 14

15 15

16 16

17 17

18 18

19 19

20 20
Friction Ratio (%)
0 300 600 900 1200 1500
qc (kg/cm²)
Cummulative Friction (kg/cm)
DUTCH CONE PENETRATION TEST

Project : Jakarta Integration Base Project Test No. : S-17

Location : KITIC, Deltamas - Bekasi Tested by : Ade Cs
Date : 26 April 2013

0 50 100 150 200 250 0 2 4 6 8 10

0 0

1 1

2 2

3 3

4 4

5 5

6 6

7 7

8 8

9 9
Depth (m)
Depth (m)

10 10

11 11

12 12

13 13

14 14

15 15

16 16

17 17

18 18

19 19

20 20
Friction Ratio (%)
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
qc (kg/cm²)
Cummulative Friction (kg/cm)
DUTCH CONE PENETRATION TEST

Project : Jakarta Integration Base Project Test No. : S-18

Location : KITIC, Deltamas - Bekasi Tested by : Ade Cs
Date : 26 April 2013

0 50 100 150 200 250 0 2 4 6 8 10

0 0

1 1

2 2

3 3

4 4

5 5

6 6

7 7

8 8

9 9
Depth (m)
Depth (m)

10 10

11 11

12 12

13 13

14 14

15 15

16 16

17 17

18 18

19 19

20 20
Friction Ratio (%)
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
qc (kg/cm²)
Cummulative Friction (kg/cm)
DUTCH CONE PENETRATION TEST

Project : Jakarta Integration Base Project Test No. : S-19

Location : KITIC, Deltamas - Bekasi Tested by : Ade Cs
Date : 25 April 2013

0 50 100 150 200 250 0 2 4 6 8 10

0 0

1 1

2 2

3 3

4 4

5 5

6 6

7 7

8 8

9 9
Depth (m)
Depth (m)

10 10

11 11

12 12

13 13

14 14

15 15

16 16

17 17

18 18

19 19

20 20
Friction Ratio (%)
0 280 560 840 1120 1400
qc (kg/cm²)
Cummulative Friction (kg/cm)
DUTCH CONE PENETRATION TEST

Project : Jakarta Integration Base Project Test No. : S-20

Location : KITIC, Deltamas - Bekasi Tested by : Ade Cs
Date : 29 April 2013

0 50 100 150 200 250 0 2 4 6 8 10

0 0

1 1

2 2

3 3

4 4

5 5

6 6

7 7

8 8

9 9
Depth (m)
Depth (m)

10 10

11 11

12 12

13 13

14 14

15 15

16 16

17 17

18 18

19 19

20 20
Friction Ratio (%)
0 300 600 900 1200 1500
qc (kg/cm²)
Cummulative Friction (kg/cm)
DUTCH CONE PENETRATION TEST

Project : Jakarta Integration Base Project Test No. : S-21

Location : KITIC, Deltamas - Bekasi Tested by : Ade Cs
Date : 29 April 2013

0 50 100 150 200 250 0 3 6 9 12 15

0 0

1 1

2 2

3 3

4 4

5 5

6 6

7 7

8 8

9 9
Depth (m)
Depth (m)

10 10

11 11

12 12

13 13

14 14

15 15

16 16

17 17

18 18

19 19

20 20
Friction Ratio (%)
0 260 520 780 1040 1300
qc (kg/cm²)
Cummulative Friction (kg/cm)
DUTCH CONE PENETRATION TEST

Project : Jakarta Integration Base Project Test No. : S-22

Location : KITIC, Deltamas - Bekasi Tested by : Ade Cs
Date : 28 April 2013

0 50 100 150 200 250 0 3 6 9 12

0 0

1 1

2 2

3 3

4 4

5 5

6 6

7 7

8 8

9 9
Depth (m)
Depth (m)

10 10

11 11

12 12

13 13

14 14

15 15

16 16

17 17

18 18

19 19

20 20
Friction Ratio (%)
0 340 680 1020 1360 1700
qc (kg/cm²)
Cummulative Friction (kg/cm)
DUTCH CONE PENETRATION TEST

Project : Jakarta Integration Base Project Test No. : S-23

Location : KITIC, Deltamas - Bekasi Tested by : Ade Cs
Date : 30 April 2013

0 50 100 150 200 250 0 4 8 12 16 20

0 0

1 1

2 2

3 3

4 4

5 5

6 6

7 7

8 8

9 9
Depth (m)
Depth (m)

10 10

11 11

12 12

13 13

14 14

15 15

16 16

17 17

18 18

19 19

20 20
Friction Ratio (%)
0 300 600 900 1200 1500
qc (kg/cm²)
Cummulative Friction (kg/cm)
DUTCH CONE PENETRATION TEST

Project : Jakarta Integration Base Project Test No. : S-24

Location : KITIC, Deltamas - Bekasi Tested by : Ade Cs
Date : 01 Mei 2013

0 50 100 150 200 250 0 3 6 9 12

0 0

1 1

2 2

3 3

4 4

5 5

6 6

7 7

8 8

9 9
Depth (m)
Depth (m)

10 10

11 11

12 12

13 13

14 14

15 15

16 16

17 17

18 18

19 19

20 20
Friction Ratio (%)
0 200 400 600 800 1000
qc (kg/cm²)
Cummulative Friction (kg/cm)
DUTCH CONE PENETRATION TEST

Project : Jakarta Integration Base Project Test No. : S-25

Location : KITIC, Deltamas - Bekasi Tested by : Ade Cs
Date : 30 April 2013

0 50 100 150 200 250 0 2 4 6 8 10

0 0

1 1

2 2

3 3

4 4

5 5

6 6

7 7

8 8

9 9
Depth (m)
Depth (m)

10 10

11 11

12 12

13 13

14 14

15 15

16 16

17 17

18 18

19 19

20 20
Friction Ratio (%)
0 260 520 780 1040 1300
qc (kg/cm²)
Cummulative Friction (kg/cm)
DUTCH CONE PENETRATION TEST

Project : Jakarta Integration Base Project Test No. : S-26

Location : KITIC, Deltamas - Bekasi Tested by : Ade Cs
Date : 01 Mei 2013

0 50 100 150 200 250 0 3 6 9 12 15

0 0

1 1

2 2

3 3

4 4

5 5

6 6

7 7

8 8

9 9
Depth (m)
Depth (m)

10 10

11 11

12 12

13 13

14 14

15 15

16 16

17 17

18 18

19 19

20 20
Friction Ratio (%)
0 240 480 720 960 1200
qc (kg/cm²)
Cummulative Friction (kg/cm)
APPENDIX D
PHOTOGRAPH OF FIELD WORK AND CORE BOX
BORE HOLE : BH-1 CORE BOX : I – DEPTH : 0.00 – 5.00 M

CORE BOX : II – DEPTH : 5.00 – 10.00 M

CORE BOX : III – DEPTH : 10.00 – 15.00 M CORE BOX : V – DEPTH : 20.00 – 25.00 M

CORE BOX : VI – DEPTH : 25.00 – 30.00 M

CORE BOX : IV – DEPTH : 15.00 – 20.00 M

BORE HOLE : BH-2 CORE BOX : I – DEPTH : 0.00 – 5.00 M

CORE BOX : II – DEPTH : 5.00 – 10.00 M

CORE BOX : III – DEPTH : 10.00 – 15.00 M CORE BOX : V – DEPTH : 20.00 – 25.00 M

CORE BOX : IV – DEPTH : 15.00 – 20.00 M CORE BOX : VI – DEPTH : 25.00 – 30.00 M
BORE HOLE : BH-3 CORE BOX : I – DEPTH : 0.00 – 5.00 M

CORE BOX : II – DEPTH : 5.00 – 10.00 M

CORE BOX : III – DEPTH : 10.00 – 15.00 M CORE BOX : V – DEPTH : 20.00 – 25.00 M

CORE BOX : IV – DEPTH : 15.00 – 20.00 M CORE BOX : VI – DEPTH : 25.00 – 30.00 M
BORE HOLE : BH-4 CORE BOX : I – DEPTH : 0.00 – 5.00 M

CORE BOX : II – DEPTH : 5.00 – 10.00 M

CORE BOX : III – DEPTH : 10.00 – 15.00 M CORE BOX : V – DEPTH : 20.00 – 25.00 M

CORE BOX : IV – DEPTH : 15.00 – 20.00 M CORE BOX : VI – DEPTH : 25.00 – 30.00 M
DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-1 DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-3

DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-2 DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-4

DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-5 DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-7

DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-6 DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-8

DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-9 DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-12

DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-10 DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-13

DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-14 DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-16

DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-15 DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-17

DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-18 DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-20

DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-19 DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-21

DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-22 DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-24

DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-23 DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-25

DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-26
BORE HOLE : BH-1 CORE BOX : I – DEPTH : 0.00 – 5.00 M

CORE BOX : II – DEPTH : 5.00 – 10.00 M

CORE BOX : III – DEPTH : 10.00 – 15.00 M CORE BOX : V – DEPTH : 20.00 – 25.00 M

CORE BOX : VI – DEPTH : 25.00 – 30.00 M

CORE BOX : IV – DEPTH : 15.00 – 20.00 M

BORE HOLE : BH-2 CORE BOX : I – DEPTH : 0.00 – 5.00 M

CORE BOX : II – DEPTH : 5.00 – 10.00 M

CORE BOX : III – DEPTH : 10.00 – 15.00 M CORE BOX : V – DEPTH : 20.00 – 25.00 M

CORE BOX : IV – DEPTH : 15.00 – 20.00 M CORE BOX : VI – DEPTH : 25.00 – 30.00 M
BORE HOLE : BH-3 CORE BOX : I – DEPTH : 0.00 – 5.00 M

CORE BOX : II – DEPTH : 5.00 – 10.00 M

CORE BOX : III – DEPTH : 10.00 – 15.00 M CORE BOX : V – DEPTH : 20.00 – 25.00 M

CORE BOX : IV – DEPTH : 15.00 – 20.00 M CORE BOX : VI – DEPTH : 25.00 – 30.00 M
BORE HOLE : BH-4 CORE BOX : I – DEPTH : 0.00 – 5.00 M

CORE BOX : II – DEPTH : 5.00 – 10.00 M

CORE BOX : III – DEPTH : 10.00 – 15.00 M CORE BOX : V – DEPTH : 20.00 – 25.00 M

CORE BOX : IV – DEPTH : 15.00 – 20.00 M CORE BOX : VI – DEPTH : 25.00 – 30.00 M
DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-1 DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-3

DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-2 DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-4

DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-5 DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-7

DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-6 DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-8

DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-9 DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-12

DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-10 DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-13

DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-14 DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-16

DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-15 DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-17

DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-18 DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-20

DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-19 DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-21

DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-22 DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-24

DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-23 DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-25

DUCTH CONE PENETRATION NO : S-26
APPENDIX E
LABORATORY TEST RESULT
LABORATORY TEST RESUME

Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS

Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limit Unconfined
Water Unit Specific Consolidation Triaxial UU TX CU Swelling Direct Shear
Depth Content Weight Gravity Compression
Location Sample no. (wn) (γn) (Gs) Clay Silt Sand Gravel WL WP IP
Classification eo Cv Cc qu Φ C Φ C Φ' C' Precent Pressure Φ C

(m) (%) ( t/m 3) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) - cm 2/sec - kPa ( o) (kN/m2) ( o) (kg/m2) ( o) (kg/m2) ( %) (kg/cm2) ( o) (kg/cm2)

1.50-2.00 56,03 1,51 2,61 96 0 3 1 106 30 76 CH 1,4764 4,50E-03 0,5256 - 0,0 7,4 - - - - 1,25 0,55 - -

7.00-7.50 39,76 1,69 2,60 83 9 8 0 93 34 59 CH 0,9448 1,62E-02 0,2423 - - - 10,86 0,12 11,38 0,09 - - - -

11.00-11.50 50,01 1,56 2,60 83 11 6 0 101 34 67 CH 1,2467 1,05E-02 0,2616 - 0,7 79,0 - - - - - - 13,65 0,380
BH-1

17.50-18.00 38,38 1,86 2,70 99 1 0 0 98 28 70 CH - - - 245,91 - - - - - - - - - -

21.00-21.50 45,89 1,74 - - - - - - - - - - - - 212,54 - - - - - - - - - -

KITIC Deltamas

27.00-27.50 41,21 1,79 - - - - - - - - - - - - 290,21 - - - - - - - - - -

3.00-3.50 66,12 1,43 2,65 70 20 9 1 112 35 77 CH 1,9163 9,24E-03 0,6348 - - - 0,19 4,04 0,16 4,98 1,55 0,58 - -

7.50-8.00 57,37 1,51 2,67 99 0 1 0 113 30 83 CH 1,4755 6,89E-03 0,4292 - 8,8 21,0 - - - - - - - -

13.00-13.50 44,18 1,83 2,60 99 1 0 0 112 30 83 CH - - - 270,32 - - - - - - - - - -

BH-2

19.50-20.00 45,69 1,82 - - - - - - - - - - - - 221,78 - - - - - - - - - -

21.50-22.00 42,35 1,71 - - - - - - - - - - - - 290,63 - - - - - - - - - -

25.50-26.00 39,93 1,62 - - - - - - - - - - - - 283,66 - - - - - - - - - -

LABORATORY TEST RESUME

Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS

(m) (%) ( t/m 3) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) - cm 2/sec - kPa ( o) (kN/m2) ( o) (kg/m2) ( o) (kg/m2) ( %) (kg/cm2) ( o) (kg/cm2)

1.00-1.50 58,18 1,70 2,51 80 14 6 0 103 34 70 CH 1,4203 8,63E-03 0,4020 - 7,6 12,0 - - - - 1,525 0,730 - -

7.00-7.50 53,01 1,52 2,61 93 1 6 0 108 33 75 CH 1,4288 1,09E-02 0,4662 - - - 8,94 0,24 9,37 0,21 - - - -

11.50-12.00 46,77 1,73 2,63 99 1 0 0 111 32 79 CH 1,2235 5,73E-03 0,2652 - 3,5 86,0 - - - - - - - -
BH-3

15.50-16.00 46,34 1,74 2,68 98 2 0 0 113 33 79 CH - - - - 3,8 98,0 - - - - - - 16,49 0,400

21.50-22.00 39,50 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 203,86 - - - - - - - - - -

KITIC Deltamas

25.50-26.00 41,02 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 341,05 - - - - - - - - - -

3.50-4.00 57,60 1,73 2,72 98 0 2 0 112 35 77 CH 1,5928 6,47E-03 0,5170 - 3,4 19,5 - - - - 3,20 0,85 - -

9.00-9.50 44,25 1,81 2,63 99 0 1 0 113 34 79 CH 1,1372 9,21E-03 0,3361 - 10,6 55,0 - - - - - - - -

13.50-14.00 45,00 1,71 2,62 100 0 0 0 106 33 72 CH - - - - - - - - - - - - 15,24 0,350

BH-4

19.00-19.50 50,35 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 86,72 - - - - - - - - - -

23.50-24.00 44,85 1,79 - - - - - - - - - - - - 153,50 - - - - - - - - - -

27.50-28.00 42,62 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 244,88 - - - - - - - - - -

INDEX PROPERTIES

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Date : 06-Mei-13

Location : KITIC Deltamas Tested By : EG
Hole No. : BH-1 Checked By : AR
Sample No. : -

Depth meter 1.50-2.00 7.00-7.50 11.00-11.50

UDS UDS UDS

SPECIFIC GRAVITY TEST (ASTM D-854 - 02)

Pycnometer No. 36 42 A B C D
Wt. Of dry Soil (A) g 10,00 10,00 10,00 10,00 10,00 10,00
0
Temperature (T) C 28,00 28,00 28,00 28,00 28,00 28,00
Wt. Pycnometer + Water + Soil (B) g 170,08 159,57 173,63 173,74 172,50 171,75
0
Wt Pycnometer + Water at T C (C) g 163,92 153,37 167,46 167,59 166,34 165,60
A+(C-B) g 3,84 3,80 3,83 3,85 3,84 3,85
Specific Gravity (Gs) 2,60 2,63 2,61 2,59 2,60 2,59
SPECIFIC GRAVITY Average (Gs) 2,61 2,60 2,60
MOISTURE CONTENT TEST (ASTM D-2216 - 98)
No. Container X11 75 C34 C18 B24 C5
Wt. Container + Wet Soil g 83,33 83,82 72,72 72,36 73,93 73,61
Wt. Container + Dry Soil g 56,88 56,97 56,07 55,89 54,32 54,14
Wt. Container g 9,37 9,35 14,32 14,34 15,20 15,12
Wt. Water g 26,45 26,85 16,65 16,47 19,61 19,47
Wt. Dry Soil g 47,51 47,62 41,75 41,55 39,12 39,02
Moisture Content (w) % 55,67 56,38 39,88 39,64 50,13 49,90
MOISTURE CONTENT Average (w) % 56,03 39,76 50,01
DENSITY TEST (ASTM D-4718 - 07)
No. Ring 5 3 4
Wt. Ring + Wet Soil g 119,29 129,40 121,27
Wt. Ring g 59,93 62,58 59,84
3 39,43 39,43 39,43
Vol. Wet Soil (= Vol. Ring) cm
BULK DENSITY (γm) t/m 3 1,51 1,69 1,56

DRY DENSITY (γd) t/m 3 0,96 1,21 1,04

VOID RATIO (e) 1,71 1,14 1,50
POROSITY (n) 0,63 0,53 0,60
DEGREE OF SATURATION (Sr) % 85,73 90,39 86,60
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
INDEX PROPERTIES

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Date : 06-Mei-13

Location : KITIC Deltamas Tested By : EG
Hole No. : BH-1 Checked By : AR
Sample No. : -

Depth meter 17.50-18.00 21.00-21.50 27.00-27.50

CS CS CS

SPECIFIC GRAVITY TEST (ASTM D-854 - 02)

Pycnometer No. E F
Wt. Of dry Soil (A) g 10,00 10,00
0
Temperature (T) C 28,00 28,00
Wt. Pycnometer + Water + Soil (B) g 173,67 172,38
0
Wt Pycnometer + Water at T C (C) g 167,38 166,07
A+(C-B) g 3,71 3,69
Specific Gravity (Gs) 2,69 2,70
SPECIFIC GRAVITY Average (Gs) 2,70
MOISTURE CONTENT TEST (ASTM D-2216 - 98)
No. Container C27 C19 B51 B38 B45 B40
Wt. Container + Wet Soil g 74,70 74,44 87,03 87,25 97,00 97,78
Wt. Container + Dry Soil g 57,93 57,91 64,15 64,54 73,14 73,41
Wt. Container g 14,56 14,52 14,68 14,65 14,77 14,75
Wt. Water g 16,77 16,53 22,88 22,71 23,86 24,37
Wt. Dry Soil g 43,37 43,39 49,47 49,89 58,37 58,66
Moisture Content (w) % 38,67 38,10 46,25 45,52 40,88 41,54
MOISTURE CONTENT Average (w) % 38,38 45,89 41,21
DENSITY TEST (ASTM D-4718 - 07)
No. Ring 15 25 34
Wt. Ring + Wet Soil g 107,73 100,72 108,23
Wt. Ring g 34,32 32,26 37,69
3 39,43 39,43 39,43
Vol. Wet Soil (= Vol. Ring) cm
BULK DENSITY (γm) t/m 3 1,86 1,74 1,79

DRY DENSITY (γd) t/m 3 1,35 1,19 1,27

VOID RATIO (e) 1,00 -1,00 -1,00
POROSITY (n) 0,50 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
DEGREE OF SATURATION (Sr) % 100,00 0,00 0,00
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
INDEX PROPERTIES

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Date : 06-Mei-13

Location : KITIC Deltamas Tested By : EG
Hole No. : BH-2 Checked By : AR
Sample No. : -

Depth meter 3.00-3.50 7.50-8.00 13.00-13.50

UDS UDS CS

SPECIFIC GRAVITY TEST (ASTM D-854 - 02)

Pycnometer No. G H I J K L
Wt. Of dry Soil (A) g 10,00 10,00 10,00 10,00 10,00 10,00
0
Temperature (T) C 28,00 28,00 28,00 28,00 28,00 28,00
Wt. Pycnometer + Water + Soil (B) g 172,57 173,58 173,02 172,43 172,11 171,95
0
Wt Pycnometer + Water at T C (C) g 166,33 167,34 166,77 166,16 165,94 165,81
A+(C-B) g 3,76 3,76 3,75 3,73 3,83 3,86
Specific Gravity (Gs) 2,65 2,65 2,66 2,68 2,61 2,59
SPECIFIC GRAVITY Average (Gs) 2,65 2,67 2,60
MOISTURE CONTENT TEST (ASTM D-2216 - 98)
No. Container 18 41 C10 C24 20 33
Wt. Container + Wet Soil g 71,60 71,57 80,47 80,49 92,79 92,71
Wt. Container + Dry Soil g 46,55 46,93 56,36 56,48 67,28 67,01
Wt. Container g 9,15 9,17 14,48 14,48 9,20 9,18
Wt. Water g 25,05 24,64 24,11 24,01 25,51 25,70
Wt. Dry Soil g 37,40 37,76 41,88 42,00 58,08 57,83
Moisture Content (w) % 66,98 65,25 57,57 57,17 43,92 44,44
MOISTURE CONTENT Average (w) % 66,12 57,37 44,18
DENSITY TEST (ASTM D-4718 - 07)
No. Ring 9 7 23
Wt. Ring + Wet Soil g 115,79 118,31 105,05
Wt. Ring g 59,51 58,72 32,73
3 39,43 39,43 39,43
Vol. Wet Soil (= Vol. Ring) cm
BULK DENSITY (γm) t/m 3 1,43 1,51 1,83

DRY DENSITY (γd) t/m 3 0,86 0,96 1,27

VOID RATIO (e) 2,09 1,78 1,04
POROSITY (n) 0,68 0,64 0,51
DEGREE OF SATURATION (Sr) % 84,01 86,08 100,00
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
INDEX PROPERTIES

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Date : 06-Mei-13

Location : KITIC Deltamas Tested By : EG
Hole No. : BH-2 Checked By : AR
Sample No. : -

Depth meter 19.50-20.00 21.50-22.00 25.50-26.00

CS CS CS

SPECIFIC GRAVITY TEST (ASTM D-854 - 02)

Pycnometer No.
Wt. Of dry Soil (A) g
0
Temperature (T) C
Wt. Pycnometer + Water + Soil (B) g
0
Wt Pycnometer + Water at T C (C) g
A+(C-B) g
Specific Gravity (Gs)
SPECIFIC GRAVITY Average (Gs)
MOISTURE CONTENT TEST (ASTM D-2216 - 98)
No. Container C4 C30 15 I C6 C22
Wt. Container + Wet Soil g 69,68 69,18 54,23 54,33 82,62 82,39
Wt. Container + Dry Soil g 52,46 52,13 40,92 40,84 63,22 63,02
Wt. Container g 14,83 14,75 9,22 9,26 14,57 14,58
Wt. Water g 17,22 17,05 13,31 13,49 19,40 19,37
Wt. Dry Soil g 37,63 37,38 31,70 31,58 48,65 48,44
Moisture Content (w) % 45,76 45,61 41,99 42,72 39,88 39,99
MOISTURE CONTENT Average (w) % 45,69 42,35 39,93
DENSITY TEST (ASTM D-4718 - 07)
No. Ring 54 45 31
Wt. Ring + Wet Soil g 104,18 98,46 123,58
Wt. Ring g 32,62 31,06 59,52
3 39,43 39,43 39,43
Vol. Wet Soil (= Vol. Ring) cm
BULK DENSITY (γm) t/m 3 1,82 1,71 1,62

DRY DENSITY (γd) t/m 3 1,25 1,20 1,16

VOID RATIO (e) -1,00 -1,00 -1,00
POROSITY (n) #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
DEGREE OF SATURATION (Sr) % 0,00 0,00 0,00
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
INDEX PROPERTIES

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Date : 06-Mei-13

Location : KITIC Deltamas Tested By : IN
Hole No. : BH-3 Checked By : AR
Sample No. : -

Depth meter 1.00-1.50 7.00-7.50 11.50-12.00

UDS UDS UDS

SPECIFIC GRAVITY TEST (ASTM D-854 - 02)

Pycnometer No. P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6
Wt. Of dry Soil (A) g 10,00 10,00 10,00 10,00 10,00 10,00
0
Temperature (T) C 28,00 28,00 28,00 28,00 28,00 28,00
Wt. Pycnometer + Water + Soil (B) g 171,70 173,50 170,53 170,88 173,52 171,51
0
Wt Pycnometer + Water at T C (C) g 165,68 167,48 164,35 164,71 167,32 165,29
A+(C-B) g 3,98 3,98 3,82 3,83 3,80 3,78
Specific Gravity (Gs) 2,51 2,51 2,61 2,61 2,63 2,64
SPECIFIC GRAVITY Average (Gs) 2,51 2,61 2,63
MOISTURE CONTENT TEST (ASTM D-2216 - 98)
No. Container 45 34 C29 C16 B3 B47
Wt. Container + Wet Soil g 71,59 71,14 87,30 87,32 55,03 55,69
Wt. Container + Dry Soil g 48,75 48,35 62,29 62,05 42,07 42,62
Wt. Container g 9,36 9,31 14,72 14,77 14,51 14,52
Wt. Water g 22,84 22,79 25,01 25,27 12,96 13,07
Wt. Dry Soil g 39,39 39,04 47,57 47,28 27,56 28,10
Moisture Content (w) % 57,98 58,38 52,58 53,45 47,02 46,51
MOISTURE CONTENT Average (w) % 58,18 53,01 46,77
DENSITY TEST (ASTM D-4718 - 07)
No. Ring 1 2 8
Wt. Ring + Wet Soil g 99,42 117,33 99,38
Wt. Ring g 32,52 57,44 31,19
3 39,43 39,43 39,43
Vol. Wet Soil (= Vol. Ring) cm
BULK DENSITY (γm) t/m 3 1,70 1,52 1,73

DRY DENSITY (γd) t/m 3 1,07 0,99 1,18

VOID RATIO (e) 1,34 1,63 1,23
POROSITY (n) 0,57 0,62 0,55
DEGREE OF SATURATION (Sr) % 100,00 84,95 99,75
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
INDEX PROPERTIES

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Date : 06-Mei-13

Location : KITIC Deltamas Tested By : EG
Hole No. : BH-3 Checked By : AR
Sample No. : -

Depth meter 15.50-16.00 21.50-22.00 25.50-26.00

CS CS CS

SPECIFIC GRAVITY TEST (ASTM D-854 - 02)

Pycnometer No. P7 P8
Wt. Of dry Soil (A) g 10,00 10,00
0
Temperature (T) C 28,00 28,00
Wt. Pycnometer + Water + Soil (B) g 172,50 169,75
0
Wt Pycnometer + Water at T C (C) g 166,22 163,49
A+(C-B) g 3,72 3,74
Specific Gravity (Gs) 2,68 2,67
SPECIFIC GRAVITY Average (Gs) 2,68
MOISTURE CONTENT TEST (ASTM D-2216 - 98)
No. Container B10 B9A 44 45 C3 C15
Wt. Container + Wet Soil g 76,88 76,68 54,61 54,80 86,45 86,02
Wt. Container + Dry Soil g 57,12 57,10 41,78 41,92 65,69 65,13
Wt. Container g 14,68 14,64 9,31 9,30 14,63 14,65
Wt. Water g 19,76 19,58 12,83 12,88 20,76 20,89
Wt. Dry Soil g 42,44 42,46 32,47 32,62 51,06 50,48
Moisture Content (w) % 46,56 46,11 39,51 39,48 40,66 41,38
MOISTURE CONTENT Average (w) % 46,34 39,50 41,02
DENSITY TEST (ASTM D-4718 - 07)
No. Ring 48
Wt. Ring + Wet Soil g 99,79
Wt. Ring g 31,37
3 39,43
Vol. Wet Soil (= Vol. Ring) cm
BULK DENSITY (γm) t/m 3 1,74

DRY DENSITY (γd) t/m 3 1,19

VOID RATIO (e) 1,26
POROSITY (n) 0,56
DEGREE OF SATURATION (Sr) % 98,69
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
INDEX PROPERTIES

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Date : 06-Mei-13

Location : KITIC Deltamas Tested By : IN
Hole No. : BH-4 Checked By : AR
Sample No. : -

Depth meter 3.50-4.00 9.00-9.50 13.50-14.00

UDS UDS CS

SPECIFIC GRAVITY TEST (ASTM D-854 - 02)

Pycnometer No. P9 P10 P11 P12 10 12
Wt. Of dry Soil (A) g 10,00 10,00 10,00 10,00 10,00 10,00
0
Temperature (T) C 28,00 28,00 28,00 28,00 28,00 28,00
Wt. Pycnometer + Water + Soil (B) g 169,84 172,00 171,90 171,87 87,24 85,94
0
Wt Pycnometer + Water at T C (C) g 163,49 165,68 165,68 165,68 81,02 79,78
A+(C-B) g 3,65 3,68 3,78 3,81 3,78 3,84
Specific Gravity (Gs) 2,73 2,71 2,64 2,62 2,64 2,60
SPECIFIC GRAVITY Average (Gs) 2,72 2,63 2,62
MOISTURE CONTENT TEST (ASTM D-2216 - 98)
No. Container 47 3 13 50 51 48
Wt. Container + Wet Soil g 61,12 61,04 70,71 70,69 71,27 71,14
Wt. Container + Dry Soil g 42,09 42,12 51,93 51,73 52,02 51,93
Wt. Container g 9,17 9,15 9,19 9,18 9,21 9,28
Wt. Water g 19,03 18,92 18,78 18,96 19,25 19,21
Wt. Dry Soil g 32,92 32,97 42,74 42,55 42,81 42,65
Moisture Content (w) % 57,81 57,39 43,94 44,56 44,97 45,04
MOISTURE CONTENT Average (w) % 57,60 44,25 45,00
DENSITY TEST (ASTM D-4718 - 07)
No. Ring 10 6 35
Wt. Ring + Wet Soil g 100,70 104,61 99,70
Wt. Ring g 32,67 33,22 32,22
3 39,43 39,43 39,43
Vol. Wet Soil (= Vol. Ring) cm
BULK DENSITY (γm) t/m 3 1,73 1,81 1,71

DRY DENSITY (γd) t/m 3 1,09 1,26 1,18

VOID RATIO (e) 1,49 1,10 1,22
POROSITY (n) 0,60 0,52 0,55
DEGREE OF SATURATION (Sr) % 100,00 100,00 96,68
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
INDEX PROPERTIES

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Date : 06-Mei-13

Location : KITIC Deltamas Tested By : IN
Hole No. : BH-4 Checked By : AR
Sample No. : -

Depth meter 19.00-19.50 23.50-24.00 27.50-28.00

CS CS CS

SPECIFIC GRAVITY TEST (ASTM D-854 - 02)

Pycnometer No.
Wt. Of dry Soil (A) g
0
Temperature (T) C
Wt. Pycnometer + Water + Soil (B) g
0
Wt Pycnometer + Water at T C (C) g
A+(C-B) g
Specific Gravity (Gs)
SPECIFIC GRAVITY Average (Gs)
MOISTURE CONTENT TEST (ASTM D-2216 - 98)
No. Container 9 7 B15 43 38 39
Wt. Container + Wet Soil g 65,63 65,51 75,68 75,86 66,74 66,35
Wt. Container + Dry Soil g 46,96 46,64 55,12 55,18 49,52 49,19
Wt. Container g 9,58 9,46 9,18 9,17 9,05 8,99
Wt. Water g 18,67 18,87 20,56 20,68 17,22 17,16
Wt. Dry Soil g 37,38 37,18 45,94 46,01 40,47 40,20
Moisture Content (w) % 49,95 50,75 44,75 44,95 42,55 42,69
MOISTURE CONTENT Average (w) % 50,35 44,85 42,62
DENSITY TEST (ASTM D-4718 - 07)
No. Ring 52
Wt. Ring + Wet Soil g 101,04
Wt. Ring g 30,42
3 39,43
Vol. Wet Soil (= Vol. Ring) cm
BULK DENSITY (γm) t/m 3 1,79

LIQUID LIMIT
PLASTIC LIMIT
No. of Blows 40 32 21 12
Container No. 775 705 742 521 A29 47
Wt. Container + Wet Soil g 23,94 23,75 23,48 23,27 22,94 22,88
Wt. Container + Dry Soil g 15,46 15,20 14,85 14,47 19,39 19,38
Wt. Water g 8,48 8,55 8,63 8,80 3,55 3,50
Wt. Container g 7,39 7,31 7,30 7,29 9,28 9,17
Wt. Dry Soil (Ws) g 8,07 7,89 7,55 7,18 10,11 10,21
Water Content (w) % 105,08 108,37 114,30 122,56 35,11 34,28

FLOW CURVE

130

120

110
Water Content (%)

100

70
25
1 10 100

Number of Blows

RESULT SUMMARY
LIQUID LIMIT 112 %
PLASTIC LIMIT 35 %
PLASTICITY INDEX 77 %
USCS CLASSIFICATION CH
ATTERBERG LIMITS
ASTM D-4318 - 00

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration Sample Type : UDS

OFS
Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 08-Mei-13
Hole No. : BH-2 Tested By : HD
Depth : 7.50-8.00 m Checked By : AR
Sample No. :- Soil Description : CLAY, brownish yellow

LIQUID LIMIT
PLASTIC LIMIT
No. of Blows 40 32 22 12
Container No. 782 674 609 672 18 13
Wt. Container + Wet Soil g 20,96 20,62 20,32 20,04 23,62 23,17
Wt. Container + Dry Soil g 13,87 13,62 13,35 13,04 20,15 20,05
Wt. Water g 7,09 7,00 6,97 7,00 3,47 3,12
Wt. Container g 7,31 7,27 7,26 7,24 9,15 9,19
Wt. Dry Soil (Ws) g 6,56 6,35 6,09 5,80 11,00 10,86
Water Content (w) % 108,08 110,24 114,45 120,69 31,55 28,73

FLOW CURVE

130

120
Water Content (%)

110

100

80
25
1 10 100

Number of Blows

RESULT SUMMARY
LIQUID LIMIT 113 %
PLASTIC LIMIT 30 %
PLASTICITY INDEX 83 %
USCS CLASSIFICATION CH
ATTERBERG LIMITS
ASTM D-4318 - 00

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration Sample Type : CS

OFS
Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 08-Mei-13
Hole No. : BH-2 Tested By : HD
Depth : 13.00-13.50 m Checked By : AR
Sample No. :- Soil Description : CLAY, dark grey

LIQUID LIMIT
PLASTIC LIMIT
No. of Blows 40 30 21 12
Container No. 322 327 329 338 51 6
Wt. Container + Wet Soil g 18,92 18,61 18,31 18,07 24,24 24,19
Wt. Container + Dry Soil g 12,42 12,12 11,81 11,48 20,70 20,87
Wt. Water g 6,50 6,49 6,50 6,59 3,54 3,32
Wt. Container g 6,24 6,19 6,15 6,13 9,21 9,23
Wt. Dry Soil (Ws) g 6,18 5,93 5,66 5,35 11,49 11,64
Water Content (w) % 105,18 109,44 114,84 123,18 30,81 28,52

FLOW CURVE

130

120

110
Water Content (%)

100

70
25
1 10 100

Number of Blows

RESULT SUMMARY
LIQUID LIMIT 112 %
PLASTIC LIMIT 30 %
PLASTICITY INDEX 83 %
USCS CLASSIFICATION CH
ATTERBERG LIMITS
ASTM D-4318 - 00

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration Sample Type : UDS

OFS
Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 08-Mei-13
Hole No. : BH-3 Tested By : HD
Depth : 1.00-1.50 m Checked By : AR
Sample No. :- Soil Description : CLAY, dark brown

LIQUID LIMIT
PLASTIC LIMIT
No. of Blows 40 31 21 12
Container No. 715 509 58 504 27 20
Wt. Container + Wet Soil g 21,94 21,75 21,47 21,25 24,84 24,72
Wt. Container + Dry Soil g 15,17 14,95 14,65 14,35 20,91 20,81
Wt. Water g 6,77 6,80 6,82 6,90 3,93 3,91
Wt. Container g 8,22 8,20 8,18 8,17 9,22 9,20
Wt. Dry Soil (Ws) g 6,95 6,75 6,47 6,18 11,69 11,61
Water Content (w) % 97,41 100,74 105,41 111,65 33,62 33,68

FLOW CURVE

120

110
Water Content (%)

100

70
25
1 10 100

Number of Blows

RESULT SUMMARY
LIQUID LIMIT 103 %
PLASTIC LIMIT 34 %
PLASTICITY INDEX 70 %
USCS CLASSIFICATION CH
ATTERBERG LIMITS
ASTM D-4318 - 00

OFS
Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 07-Mei-13
Hole No. : BH-4 Tested By : HD
Depth : 13.50-14.00 m Checked By : AR
Sample No. :- Soil Description : CLAY, dark brown

LIQUID LIMIT
PLASTIC LIMIT
No. of Blows 40 32 21 10
Container No. 336 343 358 350 48 24
Wt. Container + Wet Soil g 21,74 21,61 21,52 21,39 26,72 26,69
Wt. Container + Dry Soil g 14,15 13,82 13,49 13,09 22,34 22,32
Wt. Water g 7,59 7,79 8,03 8,30 4,38 4,37
Wt. Container g 6,29 6,20 6,16 6,11 9,26 9,15
Wt. Dry Soil (Ws) g 7,86 7,62 7,33 6,98 13,08 13,17
Water Content (w) % 96,56 102,23 109,55 118,91 33,49 33,18

FLOW CURVE

135

120
Water Content (%)

105

60
25
1 10 100

Number of Blows

RESULT SUMMARY
LIQUID LIMIT 106 %
PLASTIC LIMIT 33 %
PLASTICITY INDEX 72 %
USCS CLASSIFICATION CH
CONSOLIDATION TEST
ASTM D2435

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration Sample Type : UDS

OFS
Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 6-May-13
Hole No. : BH-1 Tested By : HD
Depth : 1.50-2.00 m Checked By : AR
Sample No. : 1 Sample Description : CLAY

CONSOLIDATION TEST REPORT

Void ratio vs Applied Pressure

1,440

1,350
Void ratio

1,260

1,170

1,080

0,990
10 100 1000
Applied Pressure (kN/m2)

Cv vs Applied Pressure
6,00
5,00
Cv (m2/yr.)

4,00
3,00
2,00
1,00
0,00
10 100 1000
Applied Pressure (kN/m2)

Natural Natural Moisture Dry Density

Saturation Content SG Cc Cv eo
% % t/m3 cm2/sec

99,05 56,03 1,05 2,61 0,5256 4,50E-03 1,4764

CONSOLIDATION TEST
ASTM D2435

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration Sample Type : UDS

OFS
Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 6-May-13
Hole No. : BH-1 Tested By : HD
Depth : 7.00-7.50 m Checked By : AR
Sample No. : 1 Sample Description : CLAY

CONSOLIDATION TEST REPORT

Void ratio vs Applied Pressure

1,000

0,960
Void ratio

0,920

0,880

0,840

0,800
10 100 1000
Applied Pressure (kN/m2)

Cv vs Applied Pressure
20,00

15,00
Cv (m2/yr.)

10,00

5,00

0,00
10 100 1000
-5,00

Applied Pressure (kN/m2)

Natural Natural Moisture Dry Density

Saturation Content SG Cc Cv eo
% % t/m3 cm2/sec

100,00 39,76 1,34 2,60 0,2423 1,62E-02 0,9448

CONSOLIDATION TEST
ASTM D2435

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration Sample Type : UDS

OFS
Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 6-May-13
Hole No. : BH-1 Tested By : HD
Depth : 11.00-11.50 m Checked By : AR
Sample No. : 1 Sample Description : CLAY

CONSOLIDATION TEST REPORT

Void ratio vs Applied Pressure

1,250

1,210
Void ratio

1,170

1,130

1,090

1,050
10 100 1000
Applied Pressure (kN/m2)

Cv vs Applied Pressure
12,00
10,00
Cv (m2/yr.)

8,00
6,00
4,00
2,00
0,00
10 100 1000
Applied Pressure (kN/m2)

Natural Natural Moisture Dry Density

Saturation Content SG Cc Cv eo
% % t/m3 cm2/sec

100,00 50,01 1,16 2,60 0,2616 1,05E-02 1,2467

CONSOLIDATION TEST
ASTM D2435

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration Sample Type : UDS

OFS
Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 6-May-13
Hole No. : BH-2 Tested By : HD
Depth : 3.00-3.50 m Checked By : AR
Sample No. : 1 Sample Description : CLAY

CONSOLIDATION TEST REPORT

Void ratio vs Applied Pressure

2,000

1,850
Void ratio

1,700

1,550

1,400

1,250
10 100 1000
Applied Pressure (kN/m2)

Cv vs Applied Pressure
14,00
12,00
10,00
Cv (m2/yr.)

8,00
6,00
4,00
2,00
0,00
-2,00 10 100 1000

Applied Pressure (kN/m2)

Natural Natural Moisture Dry Density

Saturation Content SG Cc Cv eo
% % t/m3 cm2/sec

91,44 66,12 0,91 2,65 0,6348 9,24E-03 1,9163

CONSOLIDATION TEST
ASTM D2435

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration Sample Type : UDS

OFS
Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 6-May-13
Hole No. : BH-2 Tested By : HD
Depth : 7.50-8.00 m Checked By : AR
Sample No. : 1 Sample Description : CLAY

CONSOLIDATION TEST REPORT

Void ratio vs Applied Pressure

1,500

1,420
Void ratio

1,340

1,260

1,180

1,100
10 100 1000
Applied Pressure (kN/m2)

Cv vs Applied Pressure
8,00
7,00
6,00
Cv (m2/yr.)

5,00
4,00
3,00
2,00
1,00
0,00
10 100 1000
Applied Pressure (kN/m2)

Natural Natural Moisture Dry Density

Saturation Content SG Cc Cv eo
% % t/m3 cm2/sec

100,00 57,37 1,08 2,67 0,4292 6,89E-03 1,4755

CONSOLIDATION TEST
ASTM D2435

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration Sample Type : UDS

OFS
Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 6-May-13
Hole No. : BH-3 Tested By : HD
Depth : 1.00-1.50 m Checked By : AR
Sample No. : 1 Sample Description : CLAY

CONSOLIDATION TEST REPORT

Void ratio vs Applied Pressure

1,455

1,390
Void ratio

1,325

1,260

1,195

1,130
10 100 1000
Applied Pressure (kN/m2)

Cv vs Applied Pressure
8,00
7,00
6,00
Cv (m2/yr.)

5,00
4,00
3,00
2,00
1,00
0,00
10 100 1000
Applied Pressure (kN/m2)

Natural Natural Moisture Dry Density

Saturation Content SG Cc Cv eo
% % t/m3 cm2/sec

100,00 58,18 1,04 2,51 0,4020 8,63E-03 1,4203

CONSOLIDATION TEST
ASTM D2435

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration Sample Type : UDS

OFS
Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 6-May-13
Hole No. : BH-3 Tested By : HD
Depth : 7.00-7.50 m Checked By : AR
Sample No. : 1 Sample Description : CLAY

CONSOLIDATION TEST REPORT

Void ratio vs Applied Pressure

1,450

1,380
Void ratio

1,310

1,240

1,170

1,100
10 100 1000
Applied Pressure (kN/m2)

Cv vs Applied Pressure
12,00
10,00
Cv (m2/yr.)

8,00
6,00
4,00
2,00
0,00
10 100 1000
Applied Pressure (kN/m2)

Natural Natural Moisture Dry Density

Saturation Content SG Cc Cv eo
% % t/m3 cm2/sec

96,84 53,01 1,07 2,61 0,4662 1,09E-02 1,4288

CONSOLIDATION TEST
ASTM D2435

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration Sample Type : UDS

OFS
Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 6-May-13
Hole No. : BH-3 Tested By : HD
Depth : 11.50-12.00 m Checked By : AR
Sample No. : 1 Sample Description : CLAY

CONSOLIDATION TEST REPORT

Void ratio vs Applied Pressure

1,290

1,250
Void ratio

1,210

1,170

1,130

1,090
10 100 1000
Applied Pressure (kN/m2)

Cv vs Applied Pressure
7,00
6,00
Cv (m2/yr.)

5,00
4,00
3,00
2,00
1,00
0,00
10 100 1000
Applied Pressure (kN/m2)

Natural Natural Moisture Dry Density

Saturation Content SG Cc Cv eo
% % t/m3 cm2/sec

100,00 46,77 1,18 2,63 0,2652 5,73E-03 1,2235

CONSOLIDATION TEST
ASTM D2435

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration Sample Type : UDS

OFS
Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 6-May-13
Hole No. : BH-4 Tested By : HD
Depth : 3.50-4.00 m Checked By : AR
Sample No. : 1 Sample Description : CLAY

CONSOLIDATION TEST REPORT

Void ratio vs Applied Pressure

1,600

1,510
Void ratio

1,420

1,330

1,240

1,150
10 100 1000
Applied Pressure (kN/m2)

Cv vs Applied Pressure
7,00
6,00
Cv (m2/yr.)

5,00
4,00
3,00
2,00
1,00
0,00
10 100 1000
Applied Pressure (kN/m2)

Natural Natural Moisture Dry Density

Saturation Content SG Cc Cv eo
% % t/m3 cm2/sec

98,36 57,60 1,05 2,72 0,5170 6,47E-03 1,5928

CONSOLIDATION TEST
ASTM D2435

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration Sample Type : UDS

OFS
Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 6-May-13
Hole No. : BH-4 Tested By : HD
Depth : 9.00-9.50 m Checked By : AR
Sample No. : 1 Sample Description : CLAY

CONSOLIDATION TEST REPORT

Void ratio vs Applied Pressure

1,175

1,110
Void ratio

1,045

0,980

0,915

0,850
10 100 1000
Applied Pressure (kN/m2)

Cv vs Applied Pressure
10,00

8,00
Cv (m2/yr.)

6,00

4,00

2,00

0,00
10 100 1000
Applied Pressure (kN/m2)

Natural Natural Moisture Dry Density

Saturation Content SG Cc Cv eo
% % t/m3 cm2/sec

100,00 44,25 1,23 2,63 0,3361 9,21E-03 1,1372

UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST
ASTM D 2166 - 06

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Sample No. : 1

Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 7-May-13

Boring no : BH-1 Tested By : HM
Depth : 17.50-18.00 Checked By : AR
Sample type : CS Soil description : CLAY

TEST RESULT
300

Sample Bulk Moisture At failure

Density content qu Strain
3
250 t/m % kPa %

CS 1,812 39,00 245,91 4,47

200
Deviator stress (kPa)

150

Mode of failure :

100

0
0 2 4 6
Strain (%)

MOHR CIRCLES

150

120
Shear stress (kPa)

0
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300

Normal stress (kPa)

UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST
ASTM D 2166 - 06

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Sample No. : 1

Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 7-May-13

Boring no : BH-1 Tested By : HM
Depth : 21.00-21.50 Checked By : AR
Sample type : CS Soil description : CLAY

TEST RESULT
250

Sample Bulk Moisture At failure

Density content qu Strain
3
t/m % kPa %
200

CS 1,728 45,38 212,54 4,47

Deviator stress (kPa)

150

Mode of failure :
100

0
0 2 4 6
Strain (%)

MOHR CIRCLES

150

120
Shear stress (kPa)

0
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300

Normal stress (kPa)

UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST
ASTM D 2166 - 06

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Sample No. : 1

Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 7-May-13

Boring no : BH-1 Tested By : HM
Depth : 27.00-27.50 Checked By : AR
Sample type : CS Soil description : CLAY

TEST RESULT
350

Sample Bulk Moisture At failure

Density content qu Strain
300 3
t/m % kPa %

250
CS 1,724 41,88 290,21 5,26
Deviator stress (kPa)

200

Mode of failure :
150

100

0
0 2 4 6 8
Strain (%)

MOHR CIRCLES

150

120
Shear stress (kPa)

0
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300

Normal stress (kPa)

UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST
ASTM D 2166 - 06

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Sample No. : 1

Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 7-May-13

Boring no : BH-2 Tested By : HM
Depth : 13.00-13.50 Checked By : AR
Sample type : CS Soil description : CLAY

TEST RESULT
300

Sample Bulk Moisture At failure

Density content qu Strain
3
250 t/m % kPa %

CS 1,740 44,40 270,32 6,05

200
Deviator stress (kPa)

150

Mode of failure :

100

0
0 2 4 6 8
Strain (%)

MOHR CIRCLES

150

120
Shear stress (kPa)

0
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300

Normal stress (kPa)

UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST
ASTM D 2166 - 06

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Sample No. : 1

Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 7-May-13

Boring no : BH-2 Tested By : HM
Depth : 19.50-20.00 Checked By : AR
Sample type : CS Soil description : CLAY

TEST RESULT
250

Sample Bulk Moisture At failure

Density content qu Strain
3
t/m % kPa %
200

CS 1,752 44,95 221,78 4,47

Deviator stress (kPa)

150

Mode of failure :
100

0
0 2 4 6
Strain (%)

MOHR CIRCLES

125

100
Shear stress (kPa)

0
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250

Normal stress (kPa)

UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST
ASTM D 2166 - 06

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Sample No. : 1

Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 7-May-13

Boring no : BH-2 Tested By : HM
Depth : 21.50-22.00 Checked By : AR
Sample type : CS Soil description : CLAY

TEST RESULT
350

Sample Bulk Moisture At failure

Density content qu Strain
300 3
t/m % kPa %

250
CS 1,768 42,67 290,63 3,95
Deviator stress (kPa)

200

Mode of failure :
150

100

0
0 2 4 6
Strain (%)

MOHR CIRCLES

150

120
Shear stress (kPa)

0
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300

Normal stress (kPa)

UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST
ASTM D 2166 - 06

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Sample No. : 1

Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 7-May-13

Boring no : BH-2 Tested By : HM
Depth : 25.50-26.00 Checked By : AR
Sample type : CS Soil description : CLAY

TEST RESULT
300

Sample Bulk Moisture At failure

Density content qu Strain
3
250 t/m % kPa %

CS 1,774 40,39 283,66 3,68

200
Deviator stress (kPa)

150

Mode of failure :

100

0
0 2 4 6
Strain (%)

MOHR CIRCLES

150

120
Shear stress (kPa)

0
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300

Normal stress (kPa)

UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST
ASTM D 2166 - 06

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Sample No. : 1

Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 7-May-13

Boring no : BH-3 Tested By : HM
Depth : 21.50-22.00 Checked By : AR
Sample type : CS Soil description : CLAY

TEST RESULT
250

Sample Bulk Moisture At failure

Density content qu Strain
3
t/m % kPa %
200

CS 1,801 38,79 203,86 4,21

Deviator stress (kPa)

150

Mode of failure :
100

0
0 2 4 6
Strain (%)

MOHR CIRCLES

125

100
Shear stress (kPa)

0
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250

Normal stress (kPa)

UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST
ASTM D 2166 - 06

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Sample No. : 1

Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 7-May-13

Boring no : BH-3 Tested By : HM
Depth : 25.50-26.00 Checked By : AR
Sample type : CS Soil description : CLAY

TEST RESULT
400

Sample Bulk Moisture At failure

350
Density content qu Strain
3
t/m % kPa %

300
CS 1,763 40,42 341,05 5,00

250
Deviator stress (kPa)

200

Mode of failure :

150

100

0
0 2 4 6
Strain (%)

MOHR CIRCLES

200

160
Shear stress (kPa)

120

0
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400

Normal stress (kPa)

UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST
ASTM D 2166 - 06

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Sample No. : 1

Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 7-May-13

Boring no : BH-4 Tested By : HM
Depth : 19.00-19.50 Checked By : AR
Sample type : CS Soil description : CLAY

TEST RESULT
100

Sample Bulk Moisture At failure

90
Density content qu Strain
3
t/m % kPa %
80

CS 1,698 46,83 86,72 3,95

70
Deviator stress (kPa)

Mode of failure :
40

0
0 2 4 6
Strain (%)

MOHR CIRCLES

40
Shear stress (kPa)

0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Normal stress (kPa)

UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST
ASTM D 2166 - 06

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Sample No. : 1

Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 7-May-13

Boring no : BH-4 Tested By : HM
Depth : 23.50-24.00 Checked By : AR
Sample type : CS Soil description : CLAY

TEST RESULT
180

Sample Bulk Moisture At failure

160 Density content qu Strain
3
t/m % kPa %

140

CS 1,775 44,29 153,50 4,47

120
Deviator stress (kPa)

100

80 Mode of failure :

0
0 2 4 6
Strain (%)

MOHR CIRCLES

100

80
Shear stress (kPa)

0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

Normal stress (kPa)

UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST
ASTM D 2166 - 06

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Sample No. : 1

Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 7-May-13

Boring no : BH-4 Tested By : HM
Depth : 27.50-28.00 Checked By : AR
Sample type : CS Soil description : CLAY

TEST RESULT
300

Sample Bulk Moisture At failure

Density content qu Strain
3
250 t/m % kPa %

CS 1,747 43,87 244,88 4,47

200
Deviator stress (kPa)

150

Mode of failure :

100

0
0 2 4 6
Strain (%)

MOHR CIRCLES

150

120
Shear stress (kPa)

0
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300

Normal stress (kPa)

UU - TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST
ASTM D-5202 - 08

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Sample No. : -

Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 9-May-13
Boring no : BH-1 Tested By : HM
Depth : 1.50-2.00 m Checked By : AR
Sample type : UDS Soil description : CLAY

TEST RESULT
35

SPECIMEN Bulk Moisture Cell At failure

3
30 3 No. Density content pressure Deviator stress Strain
2
1
t/m3 % kN/m2 kN/m2 %

25
1 1,634 67,49 25 6,29 2,11
Deviator stress (kN/m2)

2 1,720 54,87 50 17,28 4,47

20
3 1,757 55,45 100 29,66 3,42
2

Mode of failure : 1 2 3
10

1
5

0
0 2 4 6
Strain (%)

MOHR CIRCLES
100

75
Shear stress (kN/m2)

0
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200

Normal stress (kN/m2)

Results :
C = 0,0 kN/m2

φ = 7,4 Degrees
UU - TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST
ASTM D-5202 - 08

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Sample No. : -

Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 9-May-13
Boring no : BH-1 Tested By : HM
Depth : 11.00-11.50 m Checked By : AR
Sample type : UDS Soil description : CLAY

TEST RESULT
200

SPECIMEN Bulk Moisture Cell At failure

180 3
2 No. Density content pressure Deviator stress Strain
2
1 3
160 t/m3 % kN/m2 kN/m2 %
1

140
1 1,775 50,64 50 159,63 2,63
Deviator stress (kN/m2)

120
2 1,780 49,58 100 174,67 2,37
3 1,805 46,37 200 163,16 2,11
100

60
Mode of failure : 1 2 3

0
0 2 4
Strain (%)

MOHR CIRCLES
250

200
Shear stress (kN/m2)

150

`
100

0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

Normal stress (kN/m2)

Results :
C = 79,0 kN/m2

φ = 0,7 Degrees
UU - TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST
ASTM D-5202 - 08

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Sample No. : -

Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 9-May-13
Boring no : BH-2 Tested By : HM
Depth : 7.50-8.00 m Checked By : AR
Sample type : UDS Soil description : CLAY

TEST RESULT
140

SPECIMEN Bulk Moisture Cell At failure

3
120 No. Density content pressure Deviator stress Strain
2 3
1
t/m3 % kN/m2 kN/m2 %
2
100
1 1,713 55,95 50 66,36 3,42
Deviator stress (kN/m2)

2 1,714 57,94 100 104,09 3,16

80
3 1,726 55,57 200 120,22 2,89

1
60

Mode of failure : 1 2 3
40

0
0 2 4
Strain (%)

MOHR CIRCLES
250

200
Shear stress (kN/m2)

150

`
100

0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

Normal stress (kN/m2)

Results :
C = 21,0 kN/m2

φ = 8,8 Degrees
UU - TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST
ASTM D-5202 - 08

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Sample No. : -

Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 9-May-13
Boring no : BH-3 Tested By : HM
Depth : 1.00-1.50 m Checked By : AR
Sample type : UDS Soil description : CLAY

TEST RESULT
100

SPECIMEN Bulk Moisture Cell At failure

90 3
3
No. Density content pressure Deviator stress Strain
2
1
80
2 t/m3 % kN/m2 kN/m2 %

70
1 1,673 58,58 50 42,85 8,42
Deviator stress (kN/m2)

60
2 1,719 58,23 100 79,83 4,74
3 1,754 54,44 200 88,39 4,47
50

1
40

30
Mode of failure : 1 2 3

0
0 2 4 6 8 10
Strain (%)

MOHR CIRCLES
200

150
Shear stress (kN/m2)

100

0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

Normal stress (kN/m2)

Results :
C = 12,0 kN/m2

φ = 7,6 Degrees
UU - TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST
ASTM D-5202 - 08

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Sample No. : -

Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 9-May-13
Boring no : BH-3 Tested By : HM
Depth : 11.50-12.00 m Checked By : AR
Sample type : UDS Soil description : CLAY

TEST RESULT
250

SPECIMEN Bulk Moisture Cell At failure

3
No. Density content pressure Deviator stress Strain
2 3
1
200 t/m3 % kN/m2 kN/m2 %
1
2
1 1,779 45,95 50 188,74 4,74
Deviator stress (kN/m2)

150
2 1,821 46,72 100 181,56 3,68
3 1,821 45,47 200 207,65 7,37

100

Mode of failure : 1 2 3

0
0 2 4 6 8 10
Strain (%)

MOHR CIRCLES
250

200
Shear stress (kN/m2)

150

`
100

0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

Normal stress (kN/m2)

Results :
C = 86,0 kN/m2

φ = 3,5 Degrees
UU - TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST
ASTM D-5202 - 08

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Sample No. : -

Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 9-May-13
Boring no : BH-3 Tested By : HM
Depth : 15.50-16.00 m Checked By : AR
Sample type : CS Soil description : CLAY

TEST RESULT
300

SPECIMEN Bulk Moisture Cell At failure

3
2 No. Density content pressure Deviator stress Strain
250 2
1
3 t/m3 % kN/m2 kN/m2 %

1
200 1 1,865 46,44 50 216,12 5,53
Deviator stress (kN/m2)

2 1,877 43,79 100 256,34 5,26

3 1,880 44,50 200 238,05 5,00
150

100
Mode of failure : 1 2 3

0
0 2 4 6 8
Strain (%)

MOHR CIRCLES
250

200
Shear stress (kN/m2)

150

`
100

0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

Normal stress (kN/m2)

Results :
C = 98,0 kN/m2

φ = 3,8 Degrees
UU - TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST
ASTM D-5202 - 08

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Sample No. : -

Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 9-May-13
Boring no : BH-4 Tested By : HM
Depth : 3.50-4.00 m Checked By : AR
Sample type : UDS Soil description : CLAY

TEST RESULT
90

SPECIMEN Bulk Moisture Cell At failure

80 3
2 No. Density content pressure Deviator stress Strain
2
1
70
t/m3 % kN/m2 kN/m2 %
3

60 1 1,723 59,81 50 47,59 4,47

Deviator stress (kN/m2)

2 1,737 58,49 100 78,08 5,53

50 3 1,753 55,71 200 65,61 5,00
1

30
Mode of failure : 1 2 3

0
0 2 4 6 8
Strain (%)

MOHR CIRCLES
200

150
Shear stress (kN/m2)

100

0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

Normal stress (kN/m2)

Results :
C = 19,5 kN/m2

φ = 3,4 Degrees
UU - TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST
ASTM D-5202 - 08

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Sample No. : -

Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 9-May-13
Boring no : BH-4 Tested By : HM
Depth : 9.00-9.50 m Checked By : AR
Sample type : UDS Soil description : CLAY

TEST RESULT
250

SPECIMEN Bulk Moisture Cell At failure

3 3
No. Density content pressure Deviator stress Strain
2
1
200 t/m3 % kN/m2 kN/m2 %

2
1 1,851 44,83 50 154,99 5,26
Deviator stress (kN/m2)

1
150
2 1,861 44,21 100 179,80 6,58
3 1,873 43,74 200 221,94 6,84

100

Mode of failure : 1 2 3

0
0 2 4 6 8
Strain (%)

MOHR CIRCLES
300

250

200
Shear stress (kN/m2)

150

100

0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600

Normal stress (kN/m2)

Results :
C = 55,0 kN/m2

φ = 10,6 Degrees
CU - TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Sample No. : -

Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 7-May-2013
Boring no : BH-1 Tested By : HM
Depth : 7.00-7.50 m Checked By : AR
Sample type : UDS Soil description : CLAY

Test Result
C : 0,12 (kg/cm2)
φ : 10,86 Degrees
2
C' : 0,09 (kg/cm )
φ' : 11,38 Degrees

5,0 1,8

4,0
1,6
Shear stress (kg/cm2)

3,0

1,4

2,0
ϕ
Deviator Stress (kg/cm2)

1,2
1,0

0,0 1,0

0,0 1,0 2,0 3,0 4,0 5,0 6,0 7,0 8,0

5,0
0,8

4,0
Shear stress ( kg/cm2)

0,6

3,0

0,4
2,0

ϕ'
1,0 0,2

0,0
0,0
0,0 1,0 2,0 3,0 4,0 5,0 6,0 7,0 8,0
0,0 2,0 4,0 6,0 8,0
σ (kg/cm2) Axial strain (%)
CU - TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Sample No. : -

Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 7-May-2013
Boring no : BH-2 Tested By : HM
Depth : 3.00-3.50 m Checked By : AR
Sample type : UDS Soil description : CLAY

Test Result
C : 0,19 (kg/cm2)
φ : 4,04 Degrees
2
C' : 0,16 (kg/cm )
φ' : 4,98 Degrees

5,0 0,9

4,0
0,8
Shear stress (kg/cm2)

3,0

0,7

2,0
Deviator Stress (kg/cm2)

0,6
1,0 ϕ

0,0 0,5

0,0 1,0 2,0 3,0 4,0 5,0 6,0 7,0 8,0 9,0 10,0

5,0
0,4

4,0
Shear stress ( kg/cm2)

0,3

3,0

0,2
2,0

0,1
1,0 ϕ'

0,0
0,0
0,0 1,0 2,0 3,0 4,0 5,0 6,0 7,0 8,0 9,0 10,0
0,0 2,0 4,0 6,0 8,0
σ (kg/cm2) Axial strain (%)
CU - TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Sample No. : -

Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 8-May-2013
Boring no : BH-3 Tested By : HM
Depth : 7.00-7.50 m Checked By : AR
Sample type : UDS Soil description : CLAY

Test Result
C : 0,24 (kg/cm2)
φ : 8,94 Degrees
2
C' : 0,21 (kg/cm )
φ' : 9,37 Degrees

4,0 1,8

3,0 1,6
Shear stress (kg/cm2)

2,0 1,4

ϕ
Deviator Stress (kg/cm2)

1,0 1,2

0,0 1,0

0,0 1,0 2,0 3,0 4,0 5,0 6,0 7,0

4,0
0,8
Shear stress ( kg/cm2)

3,0
0,6

2,0
0,4

ϕ'
1,0
0,2

0,0
0,0
0,0 1,0 2,0 3,0 4,0 5,0 6,0 7,0
0,0 1,0 2,0 3,0 4,0 5,0
σ (kg/cm2) Axial strain (%)
DIRECT SHEAR UU

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Sample : -

Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 8-May-13
Boring No. : BH-1 Tested By : HD
Depth : 11.00-11.50 Check By : AR
Sample Type : UDS Soil Description : CLAY
Color : Dark BROWN

1,0
RESULT (Hasil)
2
C : 0,380 kg/cm
ϕ : 13,65 deg 0,9

0,8

0,7
4,0

0,6
shear stress (kg/cm2)

3,0 0,5

0,4
shear stress (kg/cm2)

2,0
0,3

ϕ
0,2
1,0

0,1

0,0 0,0

0,0 1,0 2,0 3,0 4,0 0,0 1,0 2,0 3,0 4,0

total stress (kg/cm2) horizontal displecement (mm)

DIRECT SHEAR UU

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Sample : -

Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 8-May-13
Boring No. : BH-3 Tested By : HD
Depth : 15.50-16.00 Check By : AR
Sample Type : CS Soil Description : CLAY
Color : Dark GREY

1,2
RESULT (Hasil)
2
C : 0,400 kg/cm
ϕ : 16,49 deg
1,0

4,0 0,8
shear stress (kg/cm2)

3,0 0,6
shear stress (kg/cm2)

2,0 0,4

1,0 0,2

0,0 0,0

0,0 1,0 2,0 3,0 4,0 0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0

total stress (kg/cm2) horizontal displecement (mm)

DIRECT SHEAR UU

Project : Soil Investigation for Jakarta Integration OFS Sample : -

Location : KITIC Deltamas Date : 8-May-13
Boring No. : BH-4 Tested By : HD
Depth : 13.50-14.00 Check By : AR
Sample Type : CS Soil Description : CLAY
Color : Dark BROWN

1,0
RESULT (Hasil)
2
C : 0,350 kg/cm
ϕ : 15,24 deg 0,9

0,8

0,7
4,0

0,6
shear stress (kg/cm2)

3,0 0,5

0,4
shear stress (kg/cm2)

2,0
0,3

ϕ
0,2
1,0

0,1

0,0 0,0

0,0 1,0 2,0 3,0 4,0 0,0 1,0 2,0 3,0 4,0 5,0 6,0

total stress (kg/cm2) horizontal displecement (mm)

SWELLING TEST
Project (Contoh dari) : Jakarta Integration Base Project SNI 13-6424-2000
Location (lokasi) : KITIC, Deltamas, Cikarang
Type of sample (Jenis contoh) UDS (Asli) / DS (Terganggu)
SWELLING PRESSURE CURVE (KURVA TEKANAN PENGEMBANGAN)
:
No. of sample (No. contoh) : BH-1
Depth (Kedalaman) 1,70
: 1.50-2.00 m
Specific gravity (Berat Jenis) (Gs) : 2,6100
Solid height (Tinggi jenuh) (2H0) : 0,832 cm 1,53
Ws : 44,357 gr
Apparatus no. (No. Alat) : R.20 1,36
MEASUREMENT OF SAMPLE
Height (Tinggi) (2H) : 2,00 cm 1,19
Diameter (f) : 5,10 cm
Area (Luas) (A) : 20,418 cm2
1,02
Weight (Berat) (W) : 69,21 gr

VOID RATIO = e
Water content (Kadar air) (wn) : 56,03 %
Degree of saturation (Derajat kejenuhan) (Sr) : 100,0 % 0,85

Final Dial
Dial Change Height of Soil 2H from change Void Ratio (e)
Pressure (P) 0,68
(Perubahan (H) Perubahan dari 2H (Angka pori)
(Tekanan) Pembacaan Dial dial bacaan) (Tinggi contoh) (2H) 2H - 2Ho
(kg/cm 2) (cm) (cm) (cm) (cm) 2Ho 0,51
0,00 1,0320 2,0000 1,4028
0,0240
0,34
0,03 1,0560 2,0240 1,4316
-0,0020
0,05 1,0540 2,0220 1,4292 0,17
-0,0030
0,10 1,0510 2,0190 1,4256
-0,0030 0,00
0,20 1,0480 2,0160 1,4220 0,00 0,01 0,10 1,00 10,00
-0,0100 PRESSURE (kg/cm2)
0,40 1,0380 2,0060 1,4100
-0,0665
0,80 0,9715 1,9395 1,3301
RESULT (HASIL)
-0,9715
1,60 0,0000 0,9680 0,1630
0,0000
Swelling Percent : 1,25 %
3,20 0,0000 0,9680 0,1630 Tested By : Hendrik
0,0000
Swelling Pressure : 0,55 kg/cm2
6,40 0,0000 0,9680 0,1630 Date : 06 Mei 2013
0,0000
0,00 0,0000 0,9680 0,1630
SWELLING TEST
Project (Contoh dari) : Jakarta Integration Base Project SNI 13-6424-2000
Location (lokasi) : KITIC, Deltamas, Cikarang
Type of sample (Jenis contoh) UDS (Asli) / DS (Terganggu)
SWELLING PRESSURE CURVE (KURVA TEKANAN PENGEMBANGAN)
:
No. of sample (No. contoh) : BH-2
Depth (Kedalaman) 2,50
: 3.00-3.50
Specific gravity (Berat Jenis) (Gs) : 2,6500
Solid height (Tinggi jenuh) (2H0) : 0,728 cm 2,25
Ws : 39,411 gr
Apparatus no. (No. Alat) : R.19 2,00
MEASUREMENT OF SAMPLE
Height (Tinggi) (2H) : 2,00 cm 1,75
Diameter (f) : 5,10 cm
Area (Luas) (A) : 20,418 cm2
1,50
Weight (Berat) (W) : 65,47 gr

VOID RATIO = e
Water content (Kadar air) (wn) : 66,12 %
Degree of saturation (Derajat kejenuhan) (Sr) : 100,0 % 1,25

Final Dial
Dial Change Height of Soil 2H from change Void Ratio (e)
Pressure (P) 1,00
(Perubahan (H) Perubahan dari 2H (Angka pori)
(Tekanan) Pembacaan Dial dial bacaan) (Tinggi contoh) (2H) 2H - 2Ho
(kg/cm 2) (cm) (cm) (cm) (cm) 2Ho 0,75
0,00 1,0420 2,0000 1,7458
0,0290
0,50
0,03 1,0710 2,0290 1,7856
-0,0020
0,05 1,0690 2,0270 1,7828 0,25
-0,0060
0,10 1,0630 2,0210 1,7746
-0,0180 0,00
0,20 1,0450 2,0030 1,7499 0,00 0,01 0,10 1,00 10,00
-0,0255 PRESSURE (kg/cm2)
0,40 1,0195 1,9775 1,7149
-0,0550
0,80 0,9645 1,9225 1,6394
RESULT (HASIL)
-0,9645
1,60 0,0000 0,9580 0,3152
0,0000
Swelling Percent : 1,55 %
3,20 0,0000 0,9580 0,3152 Tested By : Hendrik
0,0000
Swelling Pressure : 0,58 kg/cm2
6,40 0,0000 0,9580 0,3152 Date : 06 Mei 2013
0,0000
0,00 0,0000 0,9580 0,3152
SWELLING TEST
Project (Contoh dari) : Jakarta Integration Base Project SNI 13-6424-2000
Location (lokasi) : KITIC, Deltamas, Cikarang
Type of sample (Jenis contoh) UDS (Asli) / DS (Terganggu)
SWELLING PRESSURE CURVE (KURVA TEKANAN PENGEMBANGAN)
:
No. of sample (No. contoh) : BH-3
Depth (Kedalaman) 2,00
: 1.00-1.50
Specific gravity (Berat Jenis) (Gs) : 2,5100
Solid height (Tinggi jenuh) (2H0) : 0,825 cm 1,80
Ws : 42,256 gr
Apparatus no. (No. Alat) : R.18 1,60
MEASUREMENT OF SAMPLE
Height (Tinggi) (2H) : 2,00 cm 1,40
Diameter (f) : 5,10 cm
Area (Luas) (A) : 20,418 cm2
1,20
Weight (Berat) (W) : 66,84 gr

VOID RATIO = e
Water content (Kadar air) (wn) : 58,18 %
Degree of saturation (Derajat kejenuhan) (Sr) : 100,0 % 1,00

Final Dial
Dial Change Height of Soil 2H from change Void Ratio (e)
Pressure (P) 0,80
(Perubahan (H) Perubahan dari 2H (Angka pori)
(Tekanan) Pembacaan Dial dial bacaan) (Tinggi contoh) (2H) 2H - 2Ho
(kg/cm 2) (cm) (cm) (cm) (cm) 2Ho 0,60
0,00 1,0250 2,0000 1,4257
0,0300
0,40
0,03 1,0550 2,0300 1,4620
-0,0015
0,05 1,0535 2,0285 1,4602 0,20
-0,0025
0,10 1,0510 2,0260 1,4572
-0,0080 0,00
0,20 1,0430 2,0180 1,4475 0,00 0,01 0,10 1,00 10,00
-0,0105 PRESSURE (kg/cm2)
0,40 1,0325 2,0075 1,4348
-0,0345
0,80 0,9980 1,9730 1,3929
RESULT (HASIL)
-0,9980
1,60 0,0000 0,9750 0,1825
0,0000
Swelling Percent : 1,525 %
3,20 0,0000 0,9750 0,1825 Tested By : Hendrik
0,0000
Swelling Pressure : 0,730 kg/cm2
6,40 0,0000 0,9750 0,1825 Date : 06 Mei 2013
0,0000
0,00 0,0000 0,9750 0,1825
SWELLING TEST
Project (Contoh dari) : Jakarta Integration Base Project SNI 13-6424-2000
Location (lokasi) : KITIC, Deltamas, Cikarang
Type of sample (Jenis contoh) UDS (Asli) / DS (Terganggu)
SWELLING PRESSURE CURVE (KURVA TEKANAN PENGEMBANGAN)
:
No. of sample (No. contoh) : BH-4
Depth (Kedalaman) 2,00
: 3.50-4.00
Specific gravity (Berat Jenis) (Gs) : 2,7200
Solid height (Tinggi jenuh) (2H0) : 0,777 cm 1,90
Ws : 43,173 gr
Apparatus no. (No. Alat) : R.17 1,80
MEASUREMENT OF SAMPLE
Height (Tinggi) (2H) : 2,00 cm 1,70
Diameter (f) : 5,10 cm
Area (Luas) (A) : 20,418 cm2
1,60
Weight (Berat) (W) : 68,04 gr

VOID RATIO = e
Water content (Kadar air) (wn) : 57,60 %
Degree of saturation (Derajat kejenuhan) (Sr) : 100,0 % 1,50

Final Dial
Dial Change Height of Soil 2H from change Void Ratio (e)
Pressure (P) 1,40
(Perubahan (H) Perubahan dari 2H (Angka pori)
(Tekanan) Pembacaan Dial dial bacaan) (Tinggi contoh) (2H) 2H - 2Ho
(kg/cm 2) (cm) (cm) (cm) (cm) 2Ho 1,30
0,00 1,0280 2,0000 1,5728
0,0650
1,20
0,03 1,0930 2,0650 1,6564
-0,0005
0,05 1,0925 2,0645 1,6557 1,10
-0,0025
0,10 1,0900 2,0620 1,6525
-0,0055 1,00
0,20 1,0845 2,0565 1,6454 0,00 0,01 0,10 1,00 10,00
-0,0130 PRESSURE (kg/cm2)
0,40 1,0715 2,0435 1,6287
-0,0355
0,80 1,0360 2,0080 1,5831
RESULT (HASIL)
-0,0155
1,60 1,0205 1,9925 1,5631
-1,0205
Swelling Percent : 3,20 %
3,20 0,0000 0,9720 0,2504 Tested By : Hendrik
0,0000
Swelling Pressure : 0,85 kg/cm2
6,40 0,0000 0,9720 0,2504 Date : 06 Mei 2013
0,0000
0,00 0,0000 0,9720 0,2504
CHEMISTRY ANALYSIS

Project : Jakarta Integration Base Date : 7 May 2013

Location : KITIC, Delta Mas, Bekasi Tested by : Ema Cs.
Indonesia Checked by : Said Saleh, BSc.

GWL
Chloride (Cl) Sulfate (SO4)
NO. Sample No. or pH
Depth ppm % ppm %
Water Sample
1 BH-1 3.20 m 4.00 53.30 0.0053 2910.00 0.2910
2 BH-2 3.20 m 6.58 337.30 0.0337 9107.00 0.9107
3 BH-3 3.40 m 5.88 28.40 0.0028 1448.00 0.1448
4 BH-4 3.50 m 4.41 21.30 0.0021 1228.00 0.1228

Soil Sample, dried to 105 degree C

5 BH-1 7.00 m 4.86 71.00 0.0071 246.96 0.0247
6 BH-2 13.00 m 10.36 85.20 0.0085 487.06 0.0487
7 BH-3 21.50 m 10.52 78.10 0.0078 236.67 0.0237
8 BH-4 27.50 m 10.43 99.40 0.0099 226.38 0.0226

2008 Bray, J. D., and Sancio, R. B. Closure To - Assessment of The Liquefaction Susceptibility of Fine-Grained Soils
100% (1)
2008 Bray, J. D., and Sancio, R. B. Closure To - Assessment of The Liquefaction Susceptibility of Fine-Grained Soils
10 pages
Jamiolkowski, M., Ladd, C.C., Germaine, J.T. & Lancellotta, R. - 1985 - New Developments in Field and Laboratory Testing of Soils
No ratings yet
Jamiolkowski, M., Ladd, C.C., Germaine, J.T. & Lancellotta, R. - 1985 - New Developments in Field and Laboratory Testing of Soils
98 pages
1985 - New Developments in Field and Laboratory Testing of Soils - Jamiolkowski
No ratings yet
1985 - New Developments in Field and Laboratory Testing of Soils - Jamiolkowski
97 pages
L&T Sub-Soil Investigation Report
100% (1)
L&T Sub-Soil Investigation Report
32 pages
Seismic CPT Whitepaper - Final - May2020
No ratings yet
Seismic CPT Whitepaper - Final - May2020
9 pages
Ieee 1222
100% (1)
Ieee 1222
51 pages
CE - 112 Geotechnical Engineering Ii
No ratings yet
CE - 112 Geotechnical Engineering Ii
23 pages
Standard Penetration Test Manual
No ratings yet
Standard Penetration Test Manual
142 pages
B - ToR - Geotechnical - Investigation
100% (1)
B - ToR - Geotechnical - Investigation
52 pages
Soil Investigation Report & Recomendations
No ratings yet
Soil Investigation Report & Recomendations
35 pages
Soil Investigation for Jamuni Bridge
No ratings yet
Soil Investigation for Jamuni Bridge
58 pages
Curtain Grouting Method for Dam Foundation
No ratings yet
Curtain Grouting Method for Dam Foundation
16 pages
Specification of Soil Nailing
No ratings yet
Specification of Soil Nailing
11 pages
Draft Geotechnical Investigation Report 30-07-2021 2
No ratings yet
Draft Geotechnical Investigation Report 30-07-2021 2
58 pages
Accomodation Plan Geotech Report-CWS Manufacturing Plant
No ratings yet
Accomodation Plan Geotech Report-CWS Manufacturing Plant
26 pages
Geo5 Settlement Sample Report
100% (1)
Geo5 Settlement Sample Report
11 pages
Geotechnical and Geophysical Investigations Under The Project "Seismic Microzonation of 30 - Cities in India"
No ratings yet
Geotechnical and Geophysical Investigations Under The Project "Seismic Microzonation of 30 - Cities in India"
156 pages
Seismic Characterization of Wind Turbine Sites Near Lawton, Oklahoma, by The MASW Method
No ratings yet
Seismic Characterization of Wind Turbine Sites Near Lawton, Oklahoma, by The MASW Method
28 pages
Brochure - Geotechnical Instrument
No ratings yet
Brochure - Geotechnical Instrument
40 pages
Standard Penetration Test Guide
No ratings yet
Standard Penetration Test Guide
10 pages
Appendix D5 Geotechnical Report
No ratings yet
Appendix D5 Geotechnical Report
82 pages
Preliminary Soil Investigation Report - S (R) 199 Tumkur
No ratings yet
Preliminary Soil Investigation Report - S (R) 199 Tumkur
7 pages
Soft Soil Engineering Basics
No ratings yet
Soft Soil Engineering Basics
48 pages
Electricity Towers Soil Investigation Report
100% (1)
Electricity Towers Soil Investigation Report
70 pages
Vacuum Preloading For Soil Improvement and Land Reclamation Projects
No ratings yet
Vacuum Preloading For Soil Improvement and Land Reclamation Projects
30 pages
Cirebon Power Plant - R0
0% (1)
Cirebon Power Plant - R0
213 pages
4.0 CPTu Report - Gandharbpur
No ratings yet
4.0 CPTu Report - Gandharbpur
15 pages
Geotechnical Investigation Advanced Report
No ratings yet
Geotechnical Investigation Advanced Report
7 pages
Understanding Soil Settlement Effects
100% (1)
Understanding Soil Settlement Effects
44 pages
Solar & Wind Project Feasibility
No ratings yet
Solar & Wind Project Feasibility
131 pages
Soil Investigation Procedure
No ratings yet
Soil Investigation Procedure
17 pages
Problematic Soils in Indonesia
No ratings yet
Problematic Soils in Indonesia
78 pages
Geotechnical Report Final
No ratings yet
Geotechnical Report Final
13 pages
Preliminary Geotech Report For The Guba Seam
No ratings yet
Preliminary Geotech Report For The Guba Seam
9 pages
Vane Shear Test
No ratings yet
Vane Shear Test
7 pages
DRAFT 7 5 15 Geotechnical Investigation at Olkaria II Plant PDF
No ratings yet
DRAFT 7 5 15 Geotechnical Investigation at Olkaria II Plant PDF
39 pages
Geotechnical Investigation Requirments
No ratings yet
Geotechnical Investigation Requirments
5 pages
Soft Soil Model in PLAXIS Guide
100% (1)
Soft Soil Model in PLAXIS Guide
5 pages
Soil Nail Wall Design Challenges
No ratings yet
Soil Nail Wall Design Challenges
11 pages
Prefabricated Vertical Drains: L.D College of Engineering Ahmedabad
No ratings yet
Prefabricated Vertical Drains: L.D College of Engineering Ahmedabad
24 pages
Awaleshpur
No ratings yet
Awaleshpur
11 pages
Report-L & T-ALH-162-R3-ok
No ratings yet
Report-L & T-ALH-162-R3-ok
32 pages
CIVL3133 Ground Improvement:: What Are The Expected Outcomes of This Lecture?
No ratings yet
CIVL3133 Ground Improvement:: What Are The Expected Outcomes of This Lecture?
22 pages
HS Chapter 1
No ratings yet
HS Chapter 1
50 pages
Geotechnical Report Final
No ratings yet
Geotechnical Report Final
82 pages
Application of Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves and Seismic Refraction To Define The Engineering Properties of Soil
No ratings yet
Application of Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves and Seismic Refraction To Define The Engineering Properties of Soil
37 pages
Geotechnical - Investigation - For Dirre Sheik Husien - PV - Hybrid - Power - Plant
No ratings yet
Geotechnical - Investigation - For Dirre Sheik Husien - PV - Hybrid - Power - Plant
22 pages
Seismic Data for BC Ministry
No ratings yet
Seismic Data for BC Ministry
9 pages
Soft Soil Improvement with PVDs
No ratings yet
Soft Soil Improvement with PVDs
2 pages
REPORT - Mr. R. BALU MANI, TIRUPUR
No ratings yet
REPORT - Mr. R. BALU MANI, TIRUPUR
8 pages
PT SOILENS - Methodology of Geotechnical Survey Works
No ratings yet
PT SOILENS - Methodology of Geotechnical Survey Works
30 pages
Thesis Proposal 2
No ratings yet
Thesis Proposal 2
18 pages
5.section-Xi Interim Report On Geotechnical Investigation
No ratings yet
5.section-Xi Interim Report On Geotechnical Investigation
27 pages
Geotechnical Investigation Report
No ratings yet
Geotechnical Investigation Report
37 pages
Evaluation of Bearing Capacity and Settlement of Foundations
100% (1)
Evaluation of Bearing Capacity and Settlement of Foundations
23 pages
Brochure - Prefabricated Horizontal Drain
No ratings yet
Brochure - Prefabricated Horizontal Drain
2 pages
Numerical Analysis of Liquefaction Mitigation
No ratings yet
Numerical Analysis of Liquefaction Mitigation
12 pages
Astm D2845 05
No ratings yet
Astm D2845 05
3 pages
Sample of Geotechnical Report
No ratings yet
Sample of Geotechnical Report
17 pages
NCSS Embakasi11
No ratings yet
NCSS Embakasi11
64 pages
MGS Brochures Geotechnical
No ratings yet
MGS Brochures Geotechnical
2 pages
Wpa64a611 - 64 D-SC
No ratings yet
Wpa64a611 - 64 D-SC
1 page
Surface
No ratings yet
Surface
149 pages
مجمع تقييمات الماث ٣ب
No ratings yet
مجمع تقييمات الماث ٣ب
54 pages
ASCO 8316 Three-Way Solenoid Valves
No ratings yet
ASCO 8316 Three-Way Solenoid Valves
2 pages
Centrifugal Pump Cover
No ratings yet
Centrifugal Pump Cover
1 page
Eee330 04 64
No ratings yet
Eee330 04 64
130 pages
Interference of Waves or Light
No ratings yet
Interference of Waves or Light
4 pages
Mathematics MHT-CET: Syllabus With Chapter Wise Weightage
No ratings yet
Mathematics MHT-CET: Syllabus With Chapter Wise Weightage
3 pages
AvatarON E8331M DG G3 2
No ratings yet
AvatarON E8331M DG G3 2
2 pages
Heat Transfer in Triangular Engine Fins
No ratings yet
Heat Transfer in Triangular Engine Fins
10 pages
M - Pump - Booster - MEPcontent - Duijvelaar Pompen - HU1 - Premium Line - DPV VFD MM - INT-EN
No ratings yet
M - Pump - Booster - MEPcontent - Duijvelaar Pompen - HU1 - Premium Line - DPV VFD MM - INT-EN
8 pages
Substation Design
No ratings yet
Substation Design
19 pages
2 Marks Theory P1
No ratings yet
2 Marks Theory P1
133 pages
Topic #15. Plane Wave in Lossy Media (p367-373) Sarfaraz Hakam
No ratings yet
Topic #15. Plane Wave in Lossy Media (p367-373) Sarfaraz Hakam
3 pages
Post-Lab Report: de Luna Doronila Mendoza Villarosa Group 6
No ratings yet
Post-Lab Report: de Luna Doronila Mendoza Villarosa Group 6
27 pages
Protecting & Grounding Communication Electronics
No ratings yet
Protecting & Grounding Communication Electronics
3 pages
Physical Science Paper 2 November 2009
No ratings yet
Physical Science Paper 2 November 2009
10 pages
Chapter - 3 Composite Manufacturing: Manufacturing Is A Very Broad Discipline and Encompasses Several Processes Such As
No ratings yet
Chapter - 3 Composite Manufacturing: Manufacturing Is A Very Broad Discipline and Encompasses Several Processes Such As
32 pages
Applied Chemistry 1 (CBCGS, DEC 2018)
No ratings yet
Applied Chemistry 1 (CBCGS, DEC 2018)
24 pages
Evolution of Water-Tube Boilers
No ratings yet
Evolution of Water-Tube Boilers
13 pages
Molecules: Perfume and Flavor Engineering: A Chemical Engineering Perspective
No ratings yet
Molecules: Perfume and Flavor Engineering: A Chemical Engineering Perspective
22 pages
Computer-Aided Drug Design Review
No ratings yet
Computer-Aided Drug Design Review
16 pages
2-5 Worksheet Velocity-Time Graphs PDF
No ratings yet
2-5 Worksheet Velocity-Time Graphs PDF
7 pages
PHASE TEST PHYSICS Fiitjee Class 8
No ratings yet
PHASE TEST PHYSICS Fiitjee Class 8
3 pages
Interpretation of Core Test Results (Grade M 40 at FG Yard) : Patch 01 & 02
No ratings yet
Interpretation of Core Test Results (Grade M 40 at FG Yard) : Patch 01 & 02
2 pages
Culvert 1+725 Hydraulic Analysis
No ratings yet
Culvert 1+725 Hydraulic Analysis
5 pages
Bas-311h Instruction Manual
No ratings yet
Bas-311h Instruction Manual
90 pages
Clausius Inequality
No ratings yet
Clausius Inequality
13 pages