Unit 11
Unit 11
Contents
11.0 Aims and Objectives
11.1 Introduction
11.2 Measuring Accounts Receivable
11.3 Measurement of Uncollectibles Accounts Receivable
11.3.1 Allowance Method
11.3.2 Direct Write-off Method
11.4 Valuation of Accounts Receivable
11.5 Use of Accounts Receivable as a Source of Cash
11.5.1 Factoring Accounts Receivable
11.5.2 Assignment of Accounts Receivable
11.5.3 Pledging of Accounts Receivable
11.6 Summary
11.7 Answers to Check Your Progress
11.8 Model Examination Questions
11.9 Glossary
This unit aims at discussing and illustrating one of the primary liquid assets of a business
enterprise, accounts receivable. The chapter places emphasis on trade receivables.
226
11.1 INTRODUCTION
The balance sheet of every business enterprise includes a variety of claims from other
parties that generally provide a future flow of cash. These receivables represent claims
for money, goods, services and non-cash assets from other firms. Receivables may be
current or non current, depending on the expected collection date. Accounts receivable
are often supported only by a sales invoice. Trade receivables describe amounts owed the
company for goods and services sold in the normal course of business. Non-trade
receivables arise from many other sources, such as tax refunds, contracts, investors,
finance receivables, installment notes, sale of assets, and advances to employees.
Accounts receivable are recognized only when the criteria for recognition are fulfilled.
They are valued at the original exchange price between the firm and the outside party,
less adjustments for cash discounts, sales returns and allowances, trade discounts and
uncollectibles accounts yielding an approximation to net realizable value, the amount of
cash expected to be collected.
1. Trade Discounts
Typically, a single invoice price for a product is published. Then, several different
discounts may apply, depending on customer type and quantity ordered. These trade
discounts reduce the final sales price and are not affected by date of payment.
Example: Assume an item priced Br. 50 is offered at a trade discount of 40 percent for
order over 1000 units. The unit price for an order of 1,100 units is therefore Br. 30 (Br.
50 x 0.6). The percentage discount can be changed for different order quantities without
changing the basic Br. 50 price.
227
For accounting purposes, the listed invoice price less the trade discount is treated as the
gross price to which cash discounts apply. Trade discounts are not accounted for
separately, but rather help define the invoice price.
2. Cash Discounts
Companies frequently offer a cash discount for payment received within a designated
period. Cash discounts are used to increase sales, to encourage early payment by the
customer, and to increase the likelihood of collection. Typical sales terms are 2/10, n/30.
That is, the customer is given a 2 percent cash discount if payment is made within 10
days from sale; otherwise, the full amount net of any returns or allowances is due in 30
days.
The incentive to pay within the discount period is generally significant although in
percentage terms this does not always appear to be the case.
Example: Ethio company purchased merchandise with a Br. 1000 gross sales price on
2/10, n/30 terms. Ethio decides to settle on the 30 th day following the sale, paying Br.
1000 without taking advantage of the Br. 20 cash discount available. Although this
decision to delay payment cost Ethio Br. 20, the annualized interest rate it pays is 37.2%!
it is computed as follows:
The Br. 20 “interest” or amount of discount lost paid by Ethio, is slightly over 2 percent
of Br. 980, a “principal” amount which would have satisfied the seller if paid within the
discount period. This rate was paid for a “borrowing” period of only 20 days, however.
The factor 365/20 represents the number of 20-day periods in a year, which yields the
substantial annualized rate. Few investments can offer such a rate of return, so most
buyers benefit by paying within the discount period. A well designed accounting
information system signals the accounts payable staff to pay bills within the discount
period.
228
Gross and Net Methods
When cash discounts are offered, the receivable and sell is recorded either at the gross or
net amount (gross invoice less available cash discount). The key distinction between the
two is the treatment of sales discounts. The gross method records sells discounts only if
the customer pays within the discount period. The net amount records sales discounts
only if the customer fails to pay within the discount period.
To illustrate the two methods, assume that Cock Company sells merchandise to Ethio
Company at a gross sales price of Br. 1000. Credit terms are 2/10, n/30. Cock company’s
entries for selected events follow.
Cock Company’s offer of a cash discount supports the net valuation of sales and accounts
receivable. Cock Company is satisfied with Br. 980 if payment is made within 10 days of
sale. Therefore, the additional Br.20 is a finance charge for delaying payment.
Entry to record collection within the 10-day discount period:
Gross method Net method
Cash 9------------------------------80 Cash ---------------980
Sales discount --------------------20 Accounts receivable ----980
Accounts receivable -----------1000
Sales discount is a contra account to sales, reducing net sales by the amount of cash
discount taken. The gross method specifically identifies discounts taken by customers.
Entry to record collection after the 10-day discount period:
Gross method Net method
Cash -----------------------------1000 Cash --------------1000
Accounts receivable --------------------1000 Accounts receivable --------980
Sales discount forfeited ----980
229
Sales are measured at the gross price under the gross method when collection is received
after the end of the discount period. The date of payment affects the amount of recorded
sales under this method because the finance charge is included in sales if the gross price
is paid.
Sales discount forfeited, a revenue account, is similar to interest revenue. The net method
specifically identifies discounts forfeited by customers. Regardless of the payment date,
the net method reports sales and receivable at the net amount, the amount acceptable to
the seller for compute payment.
Under the gross method, if a material amount of cash discount is expected to be taken on
outstanding accounts receivable at year-end, and if this amount can be estimated reliably,
an adjusting entry is required to decrease net sales and accounts receivable to the
estimated amount collectible. To illustrate, assume that Cock Company has Br. 2 million
of accounts receivable, all on 2/10, n/30 terms, recorded at gross at year-end and expects
60 percent of these accounts to be collected within the discount period. Cock Company
records an adjusting entry on December 31, 1992:
Gross method
Sales discounts (Br. 2,000,000 x 0.02 x 0.6) ----------------------24,000
Allowance for sales discounts ------------------------------------24,000
The allowance account is a contra account to accounts receivable. During 1993, assuming
that the estimates were correct, a summary entry records the relevant receipts:
Gross method
Allowance for sales discounts ------------------------24,000
Cash --------------------------------------------------1,176,000
Account receivable (Br. 2000,000 x 0.6) ----------------1,200,000
Under the net method, if the discount period on a material amount of accounts receivable
has lapsed, an adjusting entry is required to recognize forfeited discounts and increase
accounts receivable. For example, assume that at the end of 1992, Cock Company has Br.
230
980,000 of accounts receivable recorded at net on which the discount period has lapsed.
Assuming 2/10, n/30 terms, an adjusting entry is made on December 31,1992:
Net method
If proper adjusting entries are made, both methods yield similar results. In practice,
adjusting entries for sales discounts are not common when the relevant amounts from
year to year are similar.
Sales returns and allowances reduce both net accounts receivable and net sales. Assume
that Nyala Company grants Br. 16,000 of returns and allowances in 1992, the first year of
operations. The summary entry to record actual returns and allowances during the year is
the following :
Sales returns and allowances ---------------------------16,000
Accounts receivable -----------------------------------16,000
Under certain conditions, Nyala must also estimate and recognize the remaining returns
and allowances expected for 1992. Assume that total estimated sales returns and
allowances are 2% of the Br. 1 million sales for 1992.
The allowance account is contra to accounts receivable. The effect of the two entries in
this example is to reduce 1992 net sales and accounts receivable by Br. 20,000, the total
231
estimated returns and allowances on sales during 1992. In 1993, assuming that the
estimates were correct, an entry records returns and allowances on 1992 sales:
Allowance for sales returns and allowances --------------------4000
Account receivable ------------------------------------------------4000
A material discrepancy between estimated and actual returns and allowances is treated as
a change in accounting estimate and may affect future estimates. If returns and
allowances are either immaterial or relatively stable across periods, companies often do
not estimate returns and allowances at year-end.
It sales and excise taxes are collected as separately disclosed additions to the selling price
they should not be confused with revenue but should be credited to a liability account.
Whether this is done at the time of each sale or as an adjustment at the end of the
accounting period is a matter of convenience. Generally, it is preferable to record the
liability at the time of sale. For example, if a day’s sales amount to Br. 20,000 and are
subject to a 6% sales tax, the sales tax payable is Br. 1200, and the journal entry to record
sales is:
232
Account Receivable (cash) (Br. 20,000 x 1.06) ---------------------21,200
Sales tax payable (Br. 20,000 x 0.06) --------------------------------1200
Sales --------------------------------------------------------------------20,000
Check your progress – 1
i. Why companies offer cash discount?
__________________________________________________________________
________________________________.
ii. What is the nature of allowance for sales returns and allowances account?
__________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________.
Two general approaches to recognizing the cost of uncollectibles receivables are found in
practice.
Allowance method: If uncollectibles accounts receivable are both probable and
estimatable, an estimate of uncollectibles receivables is recognized and net
accounts receivables is reduced. The resulting estimated expenses reflect the likely
reduction in the value of recorded receivables. This approach reduces earnings
before specific accounts are known to be uncollectibles. Estimated uncollectibles
are recorded as bad debt expense, an operating expense, Usually classified as a
selling expense. Most large firms use this method.
Direct-write-off method: If uncollectibles accounts are not probable or estimatable,
no adjustment to income or receivables is made until specific accounts are
considered uncollectibles.
233
Under the allowance method, an adjusting entry is needed at the end of an accounting
period. For example, if a company estimates Br. 9000 of bad debts at year-end, the
adjusting entry is as follows:
Bad debt Expense ------------------------9000
Allowance for doubtful accounts -------------9000
Allowance for doubtful accounts is a contra account to accounts receivable and is used
because the identity of specific uncollectibles accounts is unknown at the time of the
above entry. A net account receivable (gross accounts receivable less the allowance
account) is an estimate of the net realizable value of the receivables.
Two subsequent events must be considered: (1) the write-off of a specific receivable and
(2) collection of an account previously written off. The adjusting entry for bad debt
expense creates the allowance for doubtful accounts for future uncollectibles accounts.
When specific accounts are determined to be collectible, they are removed from the
accounts receivable and that part of the allowance is no longer needed. The bad debt
estimation entry previously recognized the estimated economic effect of future
uncollectibles accounts. Thus, write-offs of specific accounts do not further reduce total
assets unless they exceed the estimate.
For example, the following entry is recorded by a company deciding not to pursue
collection of NOSO Company’s Br. 1000 account:
Allowance for doubtful accounts -----------------------1000
Accounts receivable- NOSO ------------------------------1000
This write-off entry affects neither income nor the net amount of accounts receivable
outstanding. Instead, it is the culmination of the process that began with the adjusting
entry to estimate bad debt expense
The write-off entry is recorded only when the likelihood of collection does not support
further collection efforts.
When amounts are received on account after a write-off, the write-off entry is reversed to
reinstate the receivable and cash collection is recorded. Assume that NOSO Company is
234
able to pay Br. 600 on account some time after the above write-off entry was recorded.
These entries are required:
Accounts receivable – NOSO ----------------------600
Allowance for doubtful accounts -----------------600
Cash ---------------------------------------------------600
Accounts receivable – NOSO --------------------------------600
The debit and credit to accounts receivable record the partial reinstatement and collection
of the account for future reference.
There are two acceptable methods of estimating bad debt expense: sales method (Income
statement approach) and the accounts receivable method (Balance sheet approach).
The objective of the sales method is accurate measurement of the expense caused by
uncollectibles accounts. The objective of the accounts receivable method is accurate
measurement of the net realizable value of accounts receivable. Some companies use
both methods. These two methods of estimating bad debt expenses are thoughly
discussed in principles of accounting textbooks, and you are strongly advised to refer
back the methods.
235
No adjusting entry is made at the end of an accounting period under the direct write-off
method.
For most receivables the amount of money to be received and the due date can be
reasonably determined. Accountants thus are faced with a relatively certain future inflow
of cash and the problem is to determine the net amount of this inflow.
236
the maturity value and the present value of accounts receivable. When the time to
maturity is long, most contracts between debtors and creditors require the payment of a
fair rate of interest, and the present value of such a contract is equal to its face amount. If
the time to maturity of account receivable is short, the present value and the amount that
will be received on the due date may be ignored. For example, a 30-day unsecured trade
account receivable almost always is recorded at its face amount. The difference between
present value and face amount of longer-term receivable always should be considered,
because this difference may be material.
Business enterprises generally raise the cash needed for current operation through the
collection of accounts receivable. It is possible to accelerate this process by
1) Selling receivables (Factoring)
2) Assigning receivables
3) Pledging receivables as collateral for loans.
Using accounts receivables to obtain financing effectively shorten the operating cycle,
hastens the return of cash to productive purposes, and alleviates short-run cash flow
problems. The costs of these arrangements include initial fees and interest on loans
collateralized by the receivables. Also, certain risks may be retained by the seller,
including bearing the cost of bad debts, cash discounts, and sales returns and allowances.
Agreements to transfer accounts receivables are made on a recourse or non-recourse
basis. In recourse financing arrangements, the transferee can collect from the transferor if
the original debtor (customer) fails to pay. If the arrangement is without recourse, the
transferee assumes the risk of collection losses. The fee is higher under non-recourse
arrangement because more risk is transferred.
237
Agreements are made on either a notification basis (customers are directed to remit to the
new party holding the receivables) or a non-notification basis (customers continue to
remit to the original seller)
Factoring refers to selling accounts receivable to another party. The enterprise selling the
accounts receivable is called the transferor and the company buying the receivables is
called transferee (factor).
Factoring transfers ownership of the receivables to the factor. In some instances, the
factor performs credit verification, receivables servicing, and collection agency services,
in effect taking over a company’s accounts receivable and credit operations. Other
factoring arrangements are less inclusive.
Factoring is common in the textile industry and in retailing. Suppliers to apparel retailers,
department stores, and discount retailers prefer not to risk shipping merchandise without
assurance that a factor will purchase the resulting receivables. The diagram below depicts
the relationship among the parties.
Accounts (5)
Cash Receivable Cash
(4) (3)
Factor
(Transferee)
The factor plays a key role in the continuance of the business relationship between
supplier and retailer. The factor charges a fee in return for accepting the risk of default by
retailers. If that risk increases, the factor will increases the fee, reduce the amount of
receivables purchased, or suspend credit to the supplier.
238
When accounts receivable are factored (sold), the factoring arrangement can be with
recourse or without recourse. If receivables are factored on a with recourse basis, the
seller guarantees payment to the factor in the event the debtor does not make payment.
When a factor buys receivables without recourse, the factor assumes the risk of
collectibles and absorbs any credit losses. Receivables that are factored with recourse
should be accounted for as a sale, recognizing any gain or loss, if all three of the
following conditions are met: (a) transfer surrenders control of the future economic
benefits of the receivables, (b) transferors obligation under the recourse provisions can be
reasonably estimated, and (c) transferee cannot require the transferor to repurchase the
receivables. If these conditions are note met, the transfer is accounted for as a borrowing.
The receivables are removed from the transferor’s books, cash is debited, and a financing
fee is recognized immediately as a financing expense or loss on sale. The factor may hold
back on amount to cover probable sales adjustments. This amount is recorded as a
receivable on the seller’s books.
Example: Largo Company factors without recourse Br. 200,000 of accounts receivable
with a finance company on a notification basis. The factor charges a 12 percent
financings fee and retains an amount equal to 10 percent of the accounts receivable for
sales adjustments. Largo does not record bad debt expense on these receivables because,
in non-recourse transfers, the finance company bears the cost of uncollectibles accounts.
The entry to record the transfer is:
239
Largo Company Books Finance Company Books
Cash (Br. 200,000 – ((0.12 + 0.1) Br. 20,000) --- 156,000
Receivable from Factor (0.1 x Br. 200,000) ------- 20,000 Accounts receivable --200,000
Loss on sale of receivable (0.12 x Br. 200,000) ---24,000 payable to Largo -----20,000
Accounts receivable ------------------------------200,000 Finance revenue ------24,000
Cash -------------------156,000
Largo company’s loss equals the finance fee. This amount is also the book value of the
receivables factors less the assets received from the finance company (Br. 200,000 – Br.
156,000 – Br. 20,000).
As customer sales adjustments occur, Largo records these deductions in the proper contra
sales accounts and credits the receivables from factor. After all adjustments are recorded,
any excess in the receivable is remitted to largo. If adjustments exceed the amount with
held by the factor (Br. 20,000 in this case), either the finance company or the seller
absorbs this amount as a loss or the two parties agree to allocate it in some other manner.
The remaining entries are based on the following additional information concerning the
factored receivables:
a. Br. 2000 of estimated and actual bad debts
b. Br. 4000 of cash discounts
c. Br. 12,000 of sales returns and allowances
Therefore, customers remitted Br. 182,000 (Br. 200,000 – Br. 2000 – Br. 4000 – Br.
12,000) to the finance company. The fiancé company records customer collections,
reduces the payable to largo by the amount of actual sales adjustment (Br. 16,000),
records bad debts, and settles with Largo.
240
Accounts receivable ---------182,000
Payable to Largo ----------4000
Cash ----------------------4000
A transfer of receivables or other financial assets is accounted for as a sale only if the
transferor surrenders control over the assets transferred, and only to the extent that
consideration other than a beneficial interest in the receivables is received. A beneficial
interest is a right to receive cash flows from the receivables if the transfer retains a
beneficial interest, the transferee may be unable to sell the assets, implying that control
has not been completely religuished by the transferor.
The transferor has surrendered control if, and only if, each of the following three
conditions of SFAS No. 125, “Accounting for Transfers and servicing of financial Assets
and Extinguishments of liabilities” are met:
1. The transferred assets have been isolated from the transferor put beyond the reach
of the transferor and its creditors.
2. The transferor has the right to pledge or exchange the assets, free of conditions
that constrain it from taking advantage of that right.
3. The transferor does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets
through an agreement that (a) both entitles and obligates the transferor to
repurchase the assets, or (b) entitles the transferor to repurchase assets that are not
readily obtainable.
The recourse obligation by itself does not prevent the recording as a sale. Nor does an
option held by the transferor to repurchase the receivables necessarily require recording
the transfer as a loan.
241
For the first condition to be met, neither the transferor nor the creditors of the transferor
(eg. in the event of the transferor’s bankruptcy) can retain a claim to the transferred
receivables. Further, the transferor can’t retain the right to revoke the transfer.
The second condition operationalizes the SFAC No. 6 definition of an asset in the context
of factored receivables. If the transferee can sell or pledge the receivables without
interference form the transferor or other parties, then the transferee has control over the
future cash flows underlying the receivables, as a result of a past transaction.
The third condition pertains to a requirement that the transferor repurchase the assets or
to an option to repurchase the receivables (a “call” option). If the transferor must
repurchase the assets (common in repurchase agreements), control has not passed to the
transferee.
In the case of an option, the transferor may wish to require interest-bearing receivables,
for example, when interest rate changes would be favorable to the holder of the
receivables. Although an option to repurchase the receivables may, at first, seem to imply
that control has not passed to the transferee, the option does not entitle the transferor to
receive interest or other benefits from the transferred receivables. The transferor does not
have custody of the assets, does not control the disposition of the asset, and cannot access
the asset unless the option is exercised.
However, the transferee must be in a position to fulfill the option, if it is exercised. The
transferred assets, or similar assets, therefore must be readily obtainable. If assets were
not readily obtainable, then the transferee would be constrained by the call option, would
not be able to sell the assets, and would not effectively control the assets. Thus an
agreement allowing the transferor to repurchase such assets would effectively maintain
control with the transferor.
242
Proceeds from transfer = consideration received – Recourse liability
Gain or loss on transfer = Proceeds from transfer – Book value of receivables.
If the proceeds exceed the book value, a gain results, and vice-versa. The transferee
recognizes all assets received at fail value.
If the transferee is not permitted to sell or pledge the collateralized receivables unless the
transferor defaults, the transferor continues to carry the assets on its books as previously
classified. However, if the transferee is permitted to sell or pledge the assets, the
transferor must reclassify the receivables and report them separately from other
receivables.
Example: Largo Company factors with recourse Br. 200,000 of accounts receivalbe with
a finance company on a notification basis. Accounting by Largo for both a sale and loan
are illustrated. The finance company’s entries are similar to the previous non-recourse
example. Assume the finance company charges 6 percent (less than in the recourse
example), and Largo estimates its recourse liability for bad debts to be Br. 3000 (bad
debts have not yet been recorded).
Largo company
Recorded as a sale Recorded as a loan
Cash ----------------------------188,000 Cash --------------------------188,000
Loss on sale of receivables ---15,000* Discount on payable to factor12,000
Accounts receivable -----------200,000 Payable to factor ----200,000
Recourse liability -----------------3,000
* 0.66 (Br. 200,000) + Br. 3000 = Br. 15,000
243
In the sales example, the proceeds to Largo equal Br. 185,000 (Br. 188,000 – Br. 3000),
the difference between cash consideration received and the recourse liability. The loss is
the difference between the proceeds and book value of the receivables and includes the
estimated bad debts. The recourse liability is classified as current or non-current
depending on the expected date of payment for defaulted accounts.
In the loan example, the discount account represents interest (the factor’s fee) over the
term of the loan. Interest expense is recognized on the balance of the payable to factor,
which declines as customers make payments.
The remaining entries record payment of the recourse liability for default accounts in the
sale example. In the loan example the payable to factor is extinguished as customers pay
on account. Also shown are the recognition of bad debts and interest expense.
Largo company
Recorded as a sale Recorded as a loan
Recourse liability --------------3000 Bad debt Expense ------3000
Cash ----------------------------3000 Allowance for doubtful accounts 3000
Allowance for doubtful accounts --3000
Accounts receivable ----------3000
Payable to factor ------------200,000
Accounts receivable --------197,000
Cash -------------------------------3000
Interest Expense ---------12,000
Discount on payable to factor 12,000
The previous example assumed no sales returns and allowances or cash discounts. As in
non-recourse factoring, sales adjustments reduce the cash obtained by the transferor from
financing the receivables. The factor may hold back a part of the proceeds to protect
against such adjustments.
Example: Assume the basic information in the Largo recourse example above and (1) the
factor holds back. Br. 10,000 for returns and allowance and actual returns and allowance
amount to Br. 6000. The entries for both sale and loan treatments are:
244
Largo company
Recorded as a sale Recorded as a loan
Cash ---------------------------178,000 Cash -----------------------------178,000
Receivable from factor -------10,000 Receivable from factor ----------10,000
Loss on sale of receivable ---15,000 Discount on payable to factor ---12,000
Accounts receivable -------------200,000 Payable to factor ------------200,000
Recourse liability --------------------3000
The assignor usually retains title to the receivables, continues to receive payments from
customer (non notification basis), bears collection costs and the risk of bad debts, and
245
agrees to use any cash collected from customers to pay the loan. A formal promissory
note often allows the assignee (lender) to seek payment directly from the receivables if
the loan is not paid when due.
The loan proceeds are typically less than the face value of the receivables assigned in
order to compensate for sales adjustments and to give the assignee a margin of protection.
The assignee charges a service fee and interest on the unpaid balance each month.
Accounts receivable assigned is a current asset listed under accounts receivable in the
balance sheet. All entries are for Frank.
To record receipt of loan proceeds:
Cash ((0.85 x Br. 80,000) – Br. 1500) ------------------------66,500
Finance expense --------------------------------------------------1,500
Notes payable (Br. 80,000 x 0.85) --------------------------68,000
To classify accounts receivables as assigned:
Accounts receivable assigned --------------------------80,000
Accounts receivable -----------------------------------------80,000
By the end of December, assume that Frank has collected Br. 46,000 cash on Br. 50,000
of the assigned accounts less Br. 3000 sales returns and Br. 1,000 sales discounts, and
remits the proceeds to the finance company.
246
To record sales adjustments:
Cash (Br. 50,000 – Br. Br. 3000 – Br. 1,000) ----------------------46,000
Sales discounts -----------------------------------------------------------1000
Sales returns and allowances -------------------------------------------3000
Accounts receivable assigned -------------------------------------------50,000
To remit collections to finance company:
Notes payable -------------------------------------------45,320
Interest Expense (Br. 68,00 x 0.12 x 1/12) -------------680
Cash -----------------------------------------------------46,000
Assigned accounts receivable are part of the total balance in accounts receivable. If the
assigned amounts are material, they should be reported as a separate subtotal within
accounts receivable.
Assume now that in January 1993, Br. 2000 of the accounts are written off as
uncollectibles (the original Br. 8000 of receivables is included in the normal bad debt
estimation process). Also, Br. 25,000 is collected on account. The remaining entries,
follow, assuming that the loan is paid in full at the end of January
247
Check your progress – 5
1. What does assignment of accounts receivable mean?
__________________________________________________________________
______________________________________.
Pledging of accounts receivable is a less formal way of using receivables as collateral for
loans. Typically, the receivables are transferred as collateral to the lender, escrow agent,
or trustee. Proceeds from receivables must be used to pay the loan, but accounts
receivable are not reclassified.
The original holder of the accounts receivables in pledging is called the pledge and the
company providing the cash is called the pledgee. If the pledge (borrower) defaults on the
loan, the pledge (creditor) has the right to use the receivables for payment.
The accounting for the receivables or the loan is not affected by pledging. When the loan
is extinguished, the pledge is voided.
11.6 SUMMARY
Receivables are defined as claims held against others for money, goods, or services.
Receivables may generally be classified as trade or non-trade. Trade receivables
(accounts receivable) are the most significant receivables an enterprise possesses. They
result from the credit sale of goods and services to customers in the normal operations of
the business. Non-trade receivables arise from variety of transactions and can be written
promises either to pay or to deliver. They are generally classified and reported as separate
items in the balance sheet when they are material in amount.
The proper amount to record for a receivable is dependent upon the face value of the
receivable, the probability of future collection, and the length of time the receivable will
be outstanding.
248
that must be considered in measuring receivables are the availability of discounts and the
length of time between sale and payment due date (the interest factor).
Two types of discount that must be considered in determining the value of receivables are
trade discounts and cash discounts. Trade discounts represent reductions from the list or
catalog prices of merchandise. They are often used to avoid frequent changes in catalogs
or to quote different prices for different prices for different quantities purchased. Cash
discounts (also called sales discounts) are offered as an inducement for prompt payment.
It is highly unlikely that a company that extends credit to its customers will successful in
collecting all of its receivables. Thus, some method must be adopted to account for
receivables that ultimately prove to be uncollectibles. The two methods currently used are
the direct write-off method and the allowance method. Under the direct-write-off the
receivable account is reduced and an expense is recorded when a specific account is
determined to be uncollectibles. The direct-write-off method is theoretically deficient
because it usually does not match costs and revenues of the period, nor does it results in
receivable being stated at estimated realizable value on the balance sheet.
Companies wishing to avoid the 30 to 60 day collection period for accounts receivables
can generate cash immediately by either assigning, or factoring, their accounts receivable.
Assignment is a borrowing-type arrangement in which assigned accounts receivable are
pledged as security for the loan received. Factoring of accounts receivable is an outright
sale of the receivables to a finance company or bank.
249
to receive the collection, the finance charges, the specific accounts that serve as security,
and notification or non-notification of debtors. The accounts assigned in a specific
assignment should be transferred to a special ledger control account, and assignment
should be clearly noted in the subsidiary ledger.
I. True / False
_________ 1. The direct write-off method used in recording uncollectibles accounts
receivable allows the Expense associated with bad debts always to be recorded in the
accounting period in which the sale was made.
_________ 2. Because the collectibility of receivables is considered a loss contingency,
the allowance method for recording bad debts is appropriate only institutions where it is
250
probable that an asset has been impaired and that the amount of the loss can be
reasonably estimated.
_________ 3. Factoring is the term used to describe the pledging of receivables as
collateral for a loan.
_________ 4. If receivables are sold with recourse, the seller guarantees payment to the
purchaser in the event the debtor does not pay.
_________ 5. The essence of a transfer of receivables in a borrowing transaction is that
the transferor retains the same risks of collectibilty on the receivables offer the
transaction that it had before the transaction.
251
_________ 3. Alpha Corporation uses the allowance method of accounting for
uncollectibles accounts. During 1993 alpha had charges to Bad Debts Expense of $
20,000 and wrote off as uncollectibles accounts receivables totaling Br. 16,000. These
transactions decreased working capital by:
a) Br. 20,000
b) Br. 16,000
c) Br. 4,000
d) Br. 0.
_________ 4. In which of the following accounts receivable assignment arrangements do
all receivables serve as collateral for the promissory note given by the assignor.
General Specific
Assignment Assignment
A. Yes Yes
B. Yes No
C. No Yes
D. No No
_________ 5. Of the following conditions which is the only one that is not required if the
transfer of receivables with recourse is to be accounted for as a sale?
A. The transferor is obligated to make a genuine effort to identify those
receivables that are uncollectibles
B. The transferor surrenders control of the future economic benefits fo the
receivables
C. The transferee cannot require the transferor to repurchase the receivables
D. The transferor’s obligation under the recourse provisions can be
reasonably estimated
III. Exercises
1. Wool Corporation began operations in year 1 and had accounts receivable of Br.
300,000 on December 31, year 1. In determining the valuation of receivables on
December 31, year 1, management wished to recognize the following:
252
Estimated doubtful accounts --------------------------------------------------Br. 6,240
Estimated collection costs -----------------------------------------------------Br. 1,800
Estimated price adjustments & other allowances
On outstanding receivables (no returns of merchandise are anticipated) Br. 3,000
Estimated cash (fuels) discounts ----------------------------------------------Br. 3,600
A) Prepare an adjusting entry for Wool Corporation on December 31, year 1, to
recognize management’s estimate of the net realizable value of accounts
receivable. No accounts were written off in year 1.
B) Show how accounts receivable are reported in Wool Corporation’s balance
sheet on December 31, year 1.
2. Certain information relative to the operations of Murphy Company for year 10 fellow:
Trade accounts receivable, Jan. 1 ---------------------------------------------Br. 16,000
Trade accounts receivable collected during year ----------------------------Br. 52,000
Cash sales -----------------------------------------------------------------------------10,000
Inventories, Jan. 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------24,000
Inventories, Dec. 31 -----------------------------------------------------------------22,000
Purchases -----------------------------------------------------------------------------40,000
Gross profit on sales -----------------------------------------------------------------18,000
Compute the amount of Murphy Company’s trade accounts receivable on December 31,
year 10
3. In the second half of year 3, Jakarta Imports Company required additional cash for its
operations and used trade accounts receivable to raise cash as follows:
(1) On July 1, Jakarta imports assigned br. 300,000 of trade accounts
receivable to Finance Company. Jakarta import received an advance from
finance of 85% of the assigned receivables, less a fee of 3% on the
advance. Prior to December 31, year 3, Jakarta imports collected br.
490,000 on the assigned receivables, and remitted br. 185,000 to finance,
br. 13,500 of which represented interest on the advance (loan payable).
(2) On Nov. 10, Jakarta imports sold br. 310,000 of trade accounts receivable
for br. 280,000. The receivables had a carrying amount of br. 290,000 and
were sold on a non-recourse basis.
253
(3) On Dec. 31, Jakarta imports obtained a loan of br. 125,000 from Rosen
Bank by pledging br. 180,000 of trade accounts receivable.
4. At January 1, 1992, the credit balance in the allowance for doubtful accounts of the
Abugida Company was Br. 200,000. the provision (expense) for doubtful accounts is
based on a percentage of net credit sales. Total sales revenue for 1992 amounted to br. 75
mullions, of which one third was on credit. Based on the latest available facts, the 1992
provision needed for doubtful accounts is estimated to be three-fourths of 1 percent of net
credit sales. During 1992, uncollectibles receivables amounting to Br. 220,000 were
written-off.
Required: Give all 1992 of entries related to doubtful accounts
5. A company sold accounts receivables of Br. 10, 000 (allowance for doubtful accounts
Br. 300) for Br. 9,000, with recourse. Estimated obligations due to the with-recourse
provision amounted to Br. 700
Required: Give the required entry, assuming a sale is recorded.
11.9 GLOSSARY
254
255