| BY CLAUDIO FERNANDEZ-ARAOZ, ANDREW ROSCOE, AND KENTARO ARAMAKI
Organizations around the world are failing on one |
key metric of success: leadership development.
According to research from the Corporate Executive
Board (CEB), 66% of companies invest in programs
that aim to identify high-potential employees and help
Be them advance, but only 24% of senior executives at those
firms consider the programs to be a success. A mere 13% have
confidence in the rising leaders at their firms, down from an
already-low 17% just three years ago. And at the world’s largest
corporations—which each employ thousands of executives—a
full 30% of new CEOs are hired from the outside.
NOVEMBER-DECEMBER 2077 HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW 87FEATURE TURNING POTENTIAL INTO SUCCESS
BREF
—
“THE PROBLEN
Corporate leadership
development programe
avert working, Less than
A quarter of encutives at
‘he organizations that havo
‘hem think theyre efetve.
THE RUALYSIS
‘valuations of managers at
thousands of eorpoations
sggoet that 72% have what
‘ttakes to grow into Cauiee
roles How ean wr bridge the
{ap between this raw talon
fd executive sucoaee?
THE SoUTION
8 fllening four steps:
+ Determine the most
Impartantcompetencios
foreadership roles in
your organizason.
+ Assess erployees
potently oking
tthe fv pradicars
assorsated wit aucess—
rotation, curiosity.
inde engage and
+ Map poopl' potato
the competencies required
inverious aes
+ Give emerging lenders the
‘opportunities, coaching
and support they need
to-strengehen the eriteal
competences.
The problem isn'ta lack of internal talent, At Egon
‘Zehnder we've been measuring executive potential
for more than 30 years, and we've identified the pre-
dictors that correlate strongly with competence at the
top. The firstis the right motivation. This generally
-meansa fierce commitment to excel in the pursuit of
big, collective goals but, toa gieat extent, is contex-
‘tual. For example, the leaders ofa large charity and of
‘an investment bank will need different kinds of mo-
tivation. This predictor car’ easily be rated or com-
pared meaningfully across individuals, However, the
other predictors—curiosity, insight, engagement, and