Journal Articles
1. Jon Tennant, ‘Time to Stop the Exploitation of Free Academic Labour’ (2020) 46
European Science Editing e51839;
2. Armin Beverungen, Steffen Böhm and Christopher Land, ‘The Poverty of Journal
Publishing’ (2012) 19 Organization 929, 932.
3. Vincent Larivière, Stefanie Haustein and Philippe Mongeon, ‘The Oligopoly of
Academic Publishers in the Digital Era’ (2015) 10 PloS One e0127502, 11, 12
4. Glenn Steele McGuigan, ‘The Business of Academic Publishing: A Strategic Analysis
of the Academic Journal Publishing Industry and Its Impact on the Future of
Scholarly Publishing’ (2008) 9 Electronic Journal of Academic and Special
Librarianship.
5. Stephen Bosch and Kittie Henderson, ‘Predicting the Future in 3,000 Words and
Charts: The Library Journal Serials Pricing Article’ (2018) 74 The Serials Librarian
224, 226.
6. Sarah Jurchen, ‘Open Access and the Serials Crisis: The Role of Academic Libraries’
(2020) 37 Technical Services Quarterly 160, 161.
7. Alex Fox and Jeffrey Brainard, ‘University of California Takes a Stand on Open
Access’ (2019) 363 Science 1023.1
8. Sergio Copiello, ‘Business as Usual with Article Processing Charges in the Transition
towards OA Publishing: A Case Study Based on Elsevier’ (2020) 8 Publications 3, 7.
9. Kyle Siler, ‘Future Challenges and Opportunities in Academic Publishing’ (2017) 42
The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie 83, 85
10. Mark W Neff, ‘How Academic Science Gave Its Soul to the Publishing Industry.’
(2020) 36 Issues in science and technology 35, 40
11. Claudio Aspesi and others, ‘SPARC Landscape Analysis: The Changing Academic
Publishing Industry – Implications for Academic Institutions’ (LIS Scholarship
Archive 2019) preprint 21
12. David J Brown, Access to Scientific Research: Challenges Facing Communications in
STM (Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG 2015) 84.
13. Kenneth R de Camargo, ‘Big Publishing and the Economics of Competition’ (2014)
104 American Journal of Public Health 8, 9
14. Aileen Fyfe, ‘Journals, Learned Societies and Money: Philosphical Transactions, CA.
1750-1900’ (2015) 69 Notes and Records: the Royal Society Journal of the History of
Science 277, 291, 292.
15. Jonathan P Tennant and others, ‘The Academic, Economic and Societal Impacts of
Open Access: An Evidence-Based Review’ (2016) 5 F1000Research 632, 2.
16. Toby Green, ‘We’ve Failed: Pirate Black Open Access Is Trumping Green and Gold
and We Must Change Our Approach’ (2017) 30 Learned Publishing 325, 326.
17. Madian Khabsa and C Lee Giles, ‘The Number of Scholarly Documents on the Public
Web’ (2014) 9 PLOS ONE e93949;
18. lberto Martín-Martín and others, ‘Evidence of Open Access of Scientific Publications
in Google Scholar: A Large-Scale Analysis’ (2018) 12 Journal of Informetrics 819;
19. John Willinsky and Matthew Rusk, ‘If Research Libraries and Funders Finance Open
Access: Moving beyond Subscriptions and APCs’ (2019) 80 College & Research
Libraries 340, 341
20. Julie MacLeavy, Richard Harris and Ron Johnston, ‘The Unintended Consequences of
Open Access Publishing – And Possible Futures’ (2020) 112 Geoforum 9, 10, 11
21. Bastian Greshake, ‘Looking into Pandora’s Box: The Content of Sci-Hub and Its
Usage’ (2017) 6 F1000Research 541.
22. Daniel S Himmelstein and others, ‘Sci-Hub Provides Access to Nearly All Scholarly
Literature’ (2018) 7 eLife e32822, 4.
23. Elizabeth Gadd and Denise Troll Covey, ‘What Does “Green” Open Access Mean?
Tracking Twelve Years of Changes to Journal Publisher Self-Archiving Policies’
(2019) 51 Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 106, 107.
24. Stevan Harnad and others, ‘The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold
Roads to Open Access’ (2004) 30 Serials Review 310.
25. Aileen Fyfe, ‘Publishing the Philosophical Transactions: The Social, Cultural and
Economic History of a Learned Journal, 1665-2015 -AHRC’ (2018) 2018 Impact 33,
35.
26. Joe Miller, ‘Why Open Access to Scholarship Matters’ (2006) 10 Scholarly Works
733, 734.
27. Paul Ginsparg, ‘ArXiv at 20’ (2011) 476 Nature 145, 146.
28. Amy EC Koehler, ‘Some Thoughts on the Meaning of Open Access for University
Library Technical Services’ (2006) 32 Serials Review 17, 18–19.
29. John Beatty, ‘Revisiting the Open Access Citation Advantage for Legal Scholarship’
(2019) 111 Law Library Journal 573, 578–580.
30. Peter Weingart and Neils Tauber (eds), ‘Trust, Quality Assurance and Open Access
Predatory Journals and the Future of the Scholarly Publication System’, The future of
scholarly publishing: open access and the economics of digitisation (English language
edition, African Minds 2017) 266.
31. Heather Piwowar and others, ‘The State of OA: A Large-Scale Analysis of the
Prevalence and Impact of Open Access Articles’ (2018) 6 PeerJ e4375.
32. Mikael Laakso and others, ‘The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing
from 1993 to 2009’ (2011) 6 PLOS ONE e20961, 1, 2
33. Peter Weingart and Niels C Taubert, ‘Changes in Scientific Publishing: A Heuristic
for Analysis’, The future of scholarly publishing: open access and the economics of
digitisation (African Minds 2017) 27.
34. Jean-Claude Guédon, ‘The “Green” and “Gold” Roads to Open Access: The Case for
Mixing and Matching’ (2004) 30 Serials Review 315, 315, 316.
35. Li Zhang and Erin M Watson, ‘Measuring the Impact of Gold and Green Open
Access’ (2017) 43 The Journal of Academic Librarianship 337, 337–340.
36. A Townsend Peterson and others, ‘Open Access Solutions for Biodiversity Journals:
Do Not Replace One Problem with Another’ (2019) 25 Diversity and Distributions 5,
7.
37. Steffen Bernius and others, ‘Open Access Models and Their Implications for the
Players on the Scientific Publishing Market’ (2009) 39 Economic Analysis and Policy
103, 106.
38. Órla O’Donovan, ‘What Is to Be Done about the Enclosures of the Academic
Publishing Oligopoly?’ (2019) 54 Community Development Journal 363, 364;
MacLeavy, Harris and Johnston (n 30) 10
39. Holly Else, ‘Nature Journals Reveal Terms of Landmark Open-Access Option’ (2020)
588 Nature 19.
40. Michael Levine-Clark, ‘Open Access and Its Impact on Access and Subscriptions’
(2018) 38 Information Services & Use 41.
41. Martin Weller, Battle for Open: How Openness Won and Why It Doesn’t Feel like
Victory (Ubiquity Press ]u[ 2014) 57–59.
42. Bo-Christer Björk and others, ‘Anatomy of Green Open Access: Journal of the
American Society for Information Science and Technology’ (2014) 65 Journal of the
Association for Information Science and Technology 237, 237.
43. John Houghton and Alma Swan, ‘Planting the Green Seeds for a Golden Harvest:
Comments and Clarifications on “Going for Gold”’ (2013) 19 D-Lib Magazine.
44. Vivek Kumar Singh, Rajesh Piryani and Satya Swarup Srichandan, ‘The Case of
Significant Variations in Gold–Green and Black Open Access: Evidence from Indian
Research Output’ (2020) 124 Scientometrics 515, 517.
45. R Ramachandran, ‘Public Access to Indian Geographical Data’ (2000) 79 Current
Science 450.
46. Francis Jayakanth and others, ‘EPrints@IISc: India’s First and Fastest Growing
Institutional Repository’ (2008) 24 OCLC Systems & Services: International digital
library perspectives 59, 62.
47. Sudarshan S Rao and Laxman N Rao, ‘Open Access Policies and Mandates: A Study
of Their Implementation in Academic Institutions in India’, Transform Libraries,
Transform Societies (2018) <http://library.ifla.org/2128/> accessed 11 August 2021.
Case Laws
48.
Books
49. John Willinsky, The Access Principle The Case for Open Access to Research and
Scholarship (MIT Press 2006) 48;
50. John Willinsky, The Access Principle the Case for Open Access to Research and
Scholarship (MIT Press 2006) 30.
51.
52. Peter Suber, Open Access (MIT Press 2012) 4.
53. Walt Crawford, Open Access: What You Need to Know Now (Amer Library Assn
2011) 18
54. Marc Scheufen, Copyright versus Open Access: On the Organisation and
International Political Economy of Access to Scientific Knowledge (Springer Berlin
Heidelberg 2015) 66, 67.
55.
Misc
56. Rachel Pells, ‘Top Universities’ Journal Subscriptions “Average £4 Million”’ Times
Higher Education (THE) (12 June 2018)
<https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/top-universities-journal-subscriptions-
average-4-million-pounds> accessed 9 May 2021.
57. Ian Sample, ‘Harvard University Says It Can’t Afford Journal Publishers’ Prices’ The
Guardian (24 April 2012)
<http://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/apr/24/harvard-university-journal-
publishers-prices> accessed 9 May 2021
58. Brian Resnick and Julia Belluz, ‘The War to Free Science’ [2019] Vox
<https://www.vox.com/the-highlight/2019/6/3/18271538/open-access-elsevier-
california-sci-hub-academic-paywalls>.
59. Michael Mabe, Rob Johnson and Anthony Watkinson, ‘The STM Report: An
Overview of Scientific and Scholarly Journal Publishing’ (International Association
of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers 2018) 5th Edition 5.
60. House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, ‘Science and Technology -
Tenth Report’ (Her Majesty’s Stationary Office 2004) para 69
<https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmsctech/399/39902.htm>
accessed 12 August 2021.
61. George Monbiot, ‘Academic Publishers Make Murdoch Look like a Socialist’ [2011]
The Guardian <https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/aug/29/academic-
publishers-murdoch-socialist> accessed 23 June 2021.
62. Stuart Lawson, ‘Journal Subscription Expenditure in the UK 2017-2019’
<https://zenodo.org/record/3659971> accessed 23 July 2021.
63. The Gold Rush: Why Open Access Will Boost Publisher Profits’ (Impact of Social
Sciences, 4 June 2019)
<https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2019/06/04/the-gold-rush-why-open-
access-will-boost-publisher-profits/> accessed 22 July 2021;
64. Bernhard Mittermaier, ‘Double Dipping in Hybrid Open Access – Chimera or
Reality?’ [2015] ScienceOpen Research 2–4, 9
<https://www.scienceopen.com/document/read?vid=a666b8c9-871e-4927-ba2d-
6df63a4d0d2c> accessed 31 July 2021
65. Gayle RYC Chan, ‘Scholarly Communication at the Crossroad: From Subscription to
Open Access?’, Transform Libraries, Transform Societies (2017) 5
<http://library.ifla.org/2192/> accessed 23 May 2021.
