Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

100% found this document useful (1 vote)
78 views17 pages

Niharika Word Document 2

Uploaded by

Vishnu Priya
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
78 views17 pages

Niharika Word Document 2

Uploaded by

Vishnu Priya
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 17
software defined radio I. Intropuction From the first wireless transmissions around 1890 [1-3], radio transmission techniques have continually evolved, providing users the possibility to. stay connected with increasing transmission rates [4]. The triumphant radio era came first, in the mid-1930, at a time when limited band widths were used for analog voice communications. Then, came the golden era of broadcast transmission in the SOs [5] with analogic television broadcasts that consumed more bandwidth but provided a rich customer experience. ‘As computers became smaller and more powerful reaching the 60s, they began to be useful as a communication media for long distances, using both wired connectivity via ARPANET{6] (which became later the Internet) and wireless satellite ALOHANET (71 Cell phones alsoemergedaround thistime[8 allowing, users to establish wireless voice communications fiom any public place or vehicle, although the original mobiles were hard to operate and to travel with, given their volume and weight. Many modem phones are now almost portable computers, providing, access to both cellular networks and the Internet, and, achieving wireless communications at speeds that ‘were unimaginable a generation ago. To the continuous progress in communications, it follows the advent of WLAN (Wireless Local Area Networks) that were originated in 1985 gontrolled by the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC) The organization put together the not licensed spectrum in three different regions, to be used in the following applications: Industry. (902-928 MHz), Science (2400-24835 MHz) and Medicine (5725-5850 MHz)[9]. However, the original IBEE standard for WLANs was not Published until 1997/10} Taking advantage of these freedoms in the spectrum, protocols such as WiFi and Bluetooth proliferated and are now a vital part of any’ corporative netwark Despitethe growthachieved by multiple technologies, aan interesting and potentially problematic issue common to all mentioned devices is that their radios and protocols are mostly hardware based. Therefore, reprogramming of reconfiguration options are Revista Focttad de Ingenieria Fac. ng.), Eneroeftord $015, Vol 94, No. 38 81 José Pal Machase-Ferninde ‘minimal, at least regarding radio funetions. This lack of flexibility is disturbing in the sense that if an error cceurs in the hardware, firmware, ar software then generally there is no reasonable way to correct the problem: the built-in wulnerabilities are not easy to remove. In fact, these devices are commonly limited in their functionality to the hardware components and cannot be reconfigured to perform ather wireless protocols beyond what the hardware itself provides [11], Precisely, the Software Defined Radio, subject of this article, aims to provide a solution to: many of the problems described along with many other benefits, A, Software Defined Radio The Software Defined Radio (SDR) is a design paradigm for wireless communications devices. Its creator, Joseph Mitola, defined the term in the early90s as an identifier of a class of radios that could be reprogrammed and reconfigured through software[12] Mitola envisioned an ideal Software Defined Radio, whose physical components were only an antenna and an Analog Digital Converter (ADC) on the receiver side. Likewise, the transmitter would have a Digital Analog Converter (DAC) and a transmitting antenna. The test of the funetions would, bbe handled by reprogrammable processors. ‘As the idea conceived in the 90sis still not achievable, and a sit will nat be likely for some time, the term SDR is used to describe a viable device that is primarily defined by software, but includes significant hardware components. Even with these components, the SDR receiver is quite different from traditional receiver B, Motivation aud Objectives SDR has evolved, like most technologies, from military to civilian environments. ‘The first operational SDR. known as Speakeasy [13] was developed by the United States’ Navy between 1991 and 1995. Unfortunately, the application could not be used with other than the hardware for which it ‘was conceived. Also, another negative issue was the fact that the: device fully occupted the backside of a transport vehicle. His younger brother, Speakeasy It (14), achieved much greater success mainly due to Software Defined Radia: Basic Prixicles ene Picotions advances in electronics, wireless communications circuits, and reusable and modular programming techniques ‘A Jong way has been traveled from that first moment to the present. Today. bath SDR software [14, 15] and) hardware [16].are available at very fow prices (in fact most software implementations ate fiee), which invites to consider the intreduction of the paradigm in radio solutions, Thus, the author establishes as the article's objective to make a review of SDR technology, including hardware designs and application fields In addition, he will show the operation of a software defined radio device, identifying employment ‘opportunities at very low eost solutions that can solve [tent problems in common radio environments. IL. SDR Harpware In this section, a theoretical review of hardware differences between traditional and SDR receivers is performed at first, explaining also how the software defined transmission takes place. Finally, a SDR device is shown setting the ground for the discussion of the technology's applications in section 3 A. Traditional Receiver A traditional or typical receiver, besides the classic demodulation, performs three other operations: (1) carrier frequency tuning to select the desired signal, (2) filter to separate it from others reeeived, and (3) amplification to compensate transmission losses. Moreover, an amplification step is commonly placed before the demodulation block to carry the signal to an acceptable level for the demodulator circuitry 07) Most traditional receivers have used conventional Fetcrodyne schemes for almost a century, The superheterodyne intemals blocks are shown in Fig. 1 [18]. A basic understanding of the structure is necessary to distinguish this conception from the new SDR receiver se 7 4 at | {mean | ralgie | ‘Coes |. Superheteradyne Receiver's Internal Blocks. In the previous scheme, afler the signal enters through the antenna, itis typically amplified by an RF stage that operates only in the frequencies of interest region ‘Then. the signal is passed to the mixer which receives the local oscillator contribution by its other input. The local oscillator’s frequency is set by the radio’s tuning control [18]. The mixer isin charge of translating the signal to the Intermediate Frequency (IF) Typically, the oscillater’s frequency is set to a value that ensures that its difference from the desired signal's frequency is equal 1o the IF. For example, if someone would like to receive a FM station at 100.7MHz and the IF were 10.7MHz, the local oscillator should be placed at 90MHz The operation is known as downconversion, The next stage is a bandpass filter that attenuates every signal except 2 specific portion of the spectrum, The bandwidth ofthis stage limits the band width of the signal that’s being received. Common center frequencies for the IF stage are 455 kHz and 10.7 MHz for commercial AM and FM respectively Likewise, for commercial FM, the bandwidth is approximately 100 kHz and for AM is above 5 kHz, consistent with the channel spacing that’s 200kHz for AM and 10 kHz for FM [19] At the end, the demodulator recovers the original ‘modulating signal from the IF amplifiee’s output employing one of several alternatives. For example, for AM an envelope detector is used, and for FM a frequencies discriminator [20]. Further processing of the signal depends on the purpose for which the receiver is intended. In a common home radio, the demodulated output is passed to an audio amplifier that is connected to a speaker a2 evista Focutod de Ingerieria (Fac. Ing). Enero-Ald 2015, Vo. 24, No. 38 B. SDR Receiver Fig. 2 shows the block diagram of a SDR receiver, At first, the RF tuner converts the analog signal to Digital Sample at Intermadiata Frequency Antenna Analogic Signal [aera | anc Amodorrewencies (Analogic Components Digtal = Components 1F, performing the same operation that the first three blocks of the superheterodyne receiver. Up to this point the two schemes converge [21] Dighal Sapte at baseband boc Fic. 2, Block Diagram of the SDR Reoerver. Next, the IF signal is passed to the ADC converter in charge of changing the signal's domain, offering digital samples at its output. The samples are feed to the following stage’s input which is a Digital Down Converter (DDC), The DDC is commonly a monolithic chip and it stands as the key part of the SDR system, It consists of three main components (1) a digital mixer, (2) a digital local oscillator, and (3)a Finite Impulse Response (FIR) low-pass filter. ‘The components operation is similar to their analog, counterparts. The digital mixer and the local oscillator shiftthe IF digital samples to baseband, while the FIR, low-pass filter limits the bandwidth of the final signal [21] For the implementation of each of its parts, the DDC includes a high number of multipliers, adders and shift registers Observe that the signals ate transferred to their baseband cquivalent at the digital mixer’s output by the disintegration into the 1 and Q counter phase components [20]. If the tuning of the digital local oscillator is modified, the desired signal can be shified away or towards the point where it reaches GHz, This variation, together with the bandwidth adjustment of the low-pass filter, defines which part of the reception is treated as-a useful signal Revista Focttad de Ingenieria Fac. ng.), Eneroeftord $015, Vol 94, No. 38 Another procedure, known as decimation, is commonly performed for reducing the sampling, frequeney or sample rate Thus, the new sampling frequency in baseband results: from the division of the original sampling frequency by an N factor, called decimation factor. The final sample rate can be as little as twice the highest frequency component of the useful signal, as proposed by the well-known Nyquist theorem [22], Furthermore, practical approaches have shown that reduction can be applied up to an extra 20% without significantly affecting, the quality of the result [19]. This can be expressed ‘numerically as is done in equation 1 S27 0.5fo=fN (A) Where f, is the frequency at baseband, fs is the sampling ficquency, N is the decimator factor and f,, is the new calculated baseband frequency alter the decimation is applied Finally, the baseband samples are passed to the Digital Signal Processing (DSP) block, where task such as demodulating and decoding are performed, among others Software Defined Radia: Basic Prixicles ene Picotions citaahegmnes A Anna buc |ntepoiaon| oA | J Re Powe iter |) eer |" conv [| conv. [* | mir Digital ‘ x a Components: samples ot Dit sme and a\iierecite Fegiencion Gy Analogie Components Fic, 3. Block Diagram of a SDR transmitter The PDS block can be implemented in an FPGA if the system is to be adapted to a specific application However, PDS stages are commonly found within a general purpose computer in the form of specialized software if versatility ts to be added to the solution, C. SDR Transmitter Although the mast common SDR devices are receivers, the technology also includes transmission schemes. The price of a SDR receiver can be as low as 20 USD [16], while the cost of SDR transmitters! receivers typically exceeds 300 USD [23] The SDR transmitter’s structure is explained below. SDR transmitters receive a baseband signal as an input, typically generated by a DSP step as it is shown in Fig. 3 The first block is a Digital Up Converter (DUC) which transfers the baseband signal to IF The DAC that follows transform the samples to the analog domain Next, the RF converter shifis the signal towards higher frequencies. Finally, the signal is amplified and directed to the antenna Taste 1 Most retevanr SDR Device Commercial Min, Max. Name Freq, (MHz) Freq. (MHz) RIL-SDR 2831 4 1766 Funeube Pro 6 1700 Funeube Prot 410 2050 MackRF 0 600 BladeRF 300 3800 USRP 1 10 60000 MatchStiq. 300 3800 Within the DUC. the Interpolation Fitter is responsible for raising the baseband signal's sample rate to match the operating frequency of the components that follow. Therefore, it performs the Decimator’s opposite operation in the receiver's architecture. IN THE Marker. Band- —_Resolu- width tionof "Transmit? Price the ADC 32 8 No 10.20 0,096 16 No 150 0,192 16 No 200 20 8 Yes 300 40 2 Yes 400-650 64 2 Yes 700 28 2 Yes 4500 Then, the digital mixer and the local oscillator shift the samples to IF, the shift being controlled by the local oscillator Ba evista Foauted de Ingenieria (Fac. Ing), Enere-Abal 9015, ¥6. 24, No. 38 D. RIL283] Device Once explained the structure of the SDR receiver and transmitter, it’s now the turn to introduce a SDR device Later, in the section 3.3, some tests are carried, ‘out exploiting its functionalities using free software. ‘As ane of the cheapest offers in the market, RIL2831SDR receiver from Teratec manufacturer is an excellent choice for a first approach to the technology: It operates in the VHF and UHF bands, allowing, the exploration of a considerable part of the spectrum used for national broadcasts in various applications. It delivers to the DSP stage a spectral width of 3,2 MHz at real time operation Although it comes equipped with a quite small antenna (customizable from 9 to 32cm), the RTL2831 can be connected to other antennas with a better performance, adapted 10 the bands of intended operation. Moreover, the device has an USB 2.0 port for communicating with the computer, consistent with the spectral width that it handles, Devices able to ‘monitor higher band-widths are commonly connected! through a traditional network cable, ‘A small list of the most popular SDR devices in the market is offered as a valuable reference in table 1 [23]. Note that RTL2831 is the cheaper device IIL SDR Sortware While the hardware components are essentials in the SDR conception, the definition of the paradigm it-self points: out the necessity of complementary dedicated software. In this section, a description of the main software tools that allows the SDR signal ‘manipulation is offered evista Focuta: Ingeniatia (Foe. ing.) Enaro-Atrl 901, Vol. 24, No. rind Fis, 4. RIL2831 SDR Device, A. SDR Frameworks In order to operate a SDR deviee. from a personal computer or from an FPGA running Digital Signal Processing, software is needed for enabling the interaction However, before developing software a framework must be created providing low-level interface Functions. Several attempts have been made sinee 1980, Most major efforts are listed below +The Software Radio (1980-1985) [24] + National Instruments — LabVIEW (1986 ~ present) [25] + US Military =SPEAKKeasy I (1992-1995) [13] + Massachusetts Institute of Technology — SpectrumWare (1994-1999) [26] = us itary ~ SPEAKeasy Il (1995-1997) [27] + US Military = Joint Tactical Radio System (1997- present) [28] + Trinity College — IRIS (1999 ~ present) [29] + Vanu Software Radio (2001- present) [30] + GNU Radio (2001 - present) [31] + Flex-Radio SDR-1000 (2002-present) [11] + Tsao, SDR Framework (2002) [32] + Universidad de Kansas = Agile Radio (2003) (33) Software Defined Radia: Basic Prixicles ene Picotions + California Institute of Technology — CallRadio (2005 - present) [34] + Rice~ WARP (2006 - present) [35] + High Performance SDR (2006 - present) [36] + Virginia ‘Tech - Open Source SCA Implementation (2006 - present} [37] + Lystech — Small Form Factor SDR (2007 - present) [38] + Virginia ‘Tech — Cognitive Engine (2007 - present) [39] + HYDRA (2007) [40] 4 35 ai 25 a 15) ‘ New Frameworks 05 ine 180 co 1 P-HAL (2008 - present) [41] + Microsoft —SORA (2009 - present) [42] ‘+ Karlsruhe Institute of Technology - MATLAB / Simulink! USRP (2009) [43] MathWorks — MATLAB / Simulink / USRP (2011 ~ present) [44] Though the above list is not complete, it ilustrates the increasing popularity of the SDR technology Projects grouped by year are show in Fig. 5 Obviously, the number of emerging frameworks has inereased since 2000 1285 Years 200 2008 Fig, $, Amount of Frameworks implemented by year Among the published list, there are three libraries that stand out for its frequent use in a great amount of the current research papers ‘The first of them appear in 2001 and it was designed exclusively for Linux operative system, but its popularity [45- 47] has extended its usage also to Windows: GNU Radio2001.The other two operate exclusively on Windows and are based on MATLAB mathematical software Karlsruhe Institute of Technology- MATLAB/Simulink/USRP2009 and MathWorks- MATLABISimulink'USRP2011, Precisely together with GNURadio, MATLAB is the most used support in SDR investigations [48-0]. The Success of GNU Radio and MATLAB mainly reside in the fact that they provide easy to handle tools for the manipulation of signals The duration over time of the above mentioned SDR frameworks is illustrated in Fig. 6. As it can be seen, there is a growing tendency to stability in new projects evista focutod de Ingenieria (Fac. Ing), Enero-Ala 2015, Yo. 26, No. 38 José Pall Machase-Ferndindes 56013651590 1895) 200 2008 2010 Years Fic. 6. Time Duration of SDR framework projects B. SDR Uses of Driver Assistance [52]. GPS signals’ Reception Once the SDR device is in communication with the personal computer. one can start looking for uses of the technology, offering specific solutions. ‘The concept af unified platform and the ability to correct errors in real time are the classic applications, of SDR. However, studies have identified other significant applications, such as: Dynamic Spectrum Positioning. Opportunity Driven Multiple Access (ODMA), Spectrum Regulation and Cost Reduction (some SDR implementations are more cheaper than its analog counterpart} [51] ‘A little beyond its traditional applications, the SDR philosophy begins to dawn on high-impact areas within telecommunications. This is the case evista Facultad de Ingenieria Fac, ng.), Enero-Attrl $015, Vo. 94, No. 38 [33], HF Propagation Analysis [34], Interpretation of Cellular Technology Emissions [53-57] particularly the OFDM modulation [58], and the Identification of Radio Frequeney Emissions [59] In other visionary fields, SDR experiments have provided encouraging results that motivate to continue the investigations, Potential applications: ae being found in areas as diverse as prototypes development [60], microscopic investigations of the strength of the magnetic resonance (61), aviation tests [62], evaluation of multi-path communications {40}, broadcast transmissions in multi-media mobile environments (63), cooperative wireless networks diversity [64], crossings prototypes between wireless networks layer, quantum optical communications and particularly in cognitive radio research [65-68], 87 Software Defined Pad 1 Pslections Fig. 7, Real time spectrum visualization ©. Employment Opportunities Many of the applications previously described are only available to large corporations and universities with high amounts of money dedicated to research. However, there are some low-cost solutions that can be achieved with the RTL2831 or another similar device using fice software. In this section, several fice downloaded softwares are presented, together with some solutions that can be materialized or studied with them. Every one of the provided figures was obtained by running the softwares on Windows Tand § 1) SDR-Sharp ‘The first software is called SDR-Sharp [14] and displays in real time all the readings that is capable to generate the SDR device, which it translates to 32 ‘MHZ in the case of the Teratec RTL2831. As shown in Fig 7, it offers of 4 main windows to the user. The top one shows the spectrum displayed in real time, in which three FM radio stations are visible in the selected example. The next window, known as waterfall chart, illustrates the signal's time behavior showing the most intense emissions in warmer colors. focutad de Ingenieria (Foc. Ing), Eneto-Alat 2015, Vo. 24, Ne The two lower windows are in charge of plotting the selected bandwidth inside the full spectrum displayed in the top window: To the left, the IF spectrum can be perceived. To the right, the frequency distribution of the voice demodulated signal is illustrated, In addition, the transmission’s apoustic content can be heard if a speaker is connected to the computer Obviously, in the example above. the demodulation scheme used a FM demodulator In addition, the software allows demodulation of the AM (Amplitude Modulation), CW (Continuous Wave). USB (Upper Side Band), LSB (Lower Side Band) and DSB (Double Side Band) signals Understanding how SDR-Sharp warks, some applications can be identified. They are shown below + Cheap Radio Receiver: A general purpose computer may become a cheap radio receiver if a SDR device is connected to it, SDR-Sharp ‘works well on single core 2GHz computers with at least IGBof RAM, Howeve ‘some operations that consume more resources. there are Fic, 8 Interference generated by an RF transmission. + Interference Detection: Not all emissions are kept within the frequeney region specifically conceive for them. Some devices Jet escape signals, resulting from undesired intermodulation, which can interfere with other radio users As itis visible in Fig. 8, SDR-Sharp isa very useful tool when is necessary to detect an interference + Spectrum Relocation: A SDR receiver allows exploring a wide range of frequencies so that nat used oF not assigned spaces can be found. as well as frequencies with very low access This type of studies allows for transmission relocation, optimizing the consumed bandwidth Spectrum Regulation and Automatic Transmission’s. Identification: Unfortunately radio users do not always maintain discipline Sometimes emissions ovcur in unauthorized bands. Real time monitoring is achievable trough SDR-Sharp. Inaddition, such a versatile tool induces the implementation of Systems for Automatic Transmission’s Identification Emissions can be distinguished not only by its bandwidth, but by its eyelie variation and specific characteristis such asthe tail’s shape of the signal. Note that the automatic identification cannot be executed directly with SDR-Sharp. New software needs to be created evista Facultad de Ingenieria Fac. ng.), Enero-Aterd 9015. Vol. 24, No. José Pall Machase-Ferndindes Distintive's til prosiuceet by the release of PPT ina ‘Conventional Radio Fic, 9. RF transmissions distinctive features, Checking Repeaters Systems: If the power receiver from several repeaters is periodically measured in a common geographic point damage, interference or disruptions can be Actected. Similarly, if a SDR transmitter was available, or a conventional radio device with a similar functionality, low rate or probably down sitesavailability could be checked, Furthermore, with the employment of frameworks as the mentioned above it’s possible to automate the process, 2) RTLSDR Scanner Another very useful softwareis RTLSDR Scanner 15] which has the characteristic of being eross platform as it has been tested on Windows 7 and 8, Ubuntu 12 and 13 and Macintosh Systems like Leopard and ‘Mountain Lion. In short, the application is a spectrum analyzer that performs consecutive scans anc! allows to gather data and to make comparisons. Unlike SDR-Sharp. it does not operate at real time Fig. 10 shows a measurement made with RTLSDR, Scanner In it, the computation of the received power's average after performing several scans over al Miz bandwidth is revealed. Note that a specific area may be selected if the user wishes to obtain numerical values for the Maximum Power, Low Pawer and Average Value Software Defined Radia: Basic Prixicles ene Picotions een 8 Fic, 10. Spectrum Analyzing with RTLSDR Scanner ‘The plotted results can be saved in different formats, and comparisons can be performed over them to analyze the measurements, One of the comparisons is shown in Fig. LI where data from consecutive scans is plotted. The colored area represents the signal's ‘variation, For example, the peak to the extreme F “Taking advantage of the benefits offered by RELSDR. Scanner, some applications can be identified, They ‘are show below: + Measurement of the repeaters” electrical parameters: RTLSDR Scanner allows checking ifthe signal parameters offered by manufacturers, are actually implemented by their equipment. ‘Transmitted power and frequency deviation can be easily checked, as well as the appearance of harmonies frequency bands near to the one intended for the communication, + Noise Characterization by Bands; By exploring the spectrum, qualified personal may analyze the noise level of cach band obtaining as a left is colored, which means that the maximum is ot constant but appears at intervals in this area By contrast, the peak to the extreme right is not colored, indicating that the local maximum hasn't fall throughout the all observation period 1. Plotting the difference between consecutives seans. result the possibility of making adjustments in the propagation calculation methods, + Spectrum Intruders Identification: Scanning silence zones, unauthorized transmissions can be detected 3) SDR for Android One of the platforms for which SDR applisations have been developed is Android. The software SDR Touch tums the phone in to a SDR receiver whose range fluctuates between SOMH2 and 2 GHz in AM FM and SSB depending on the used hardware [69] There is also another software called Pocket HAM Bands Transceiver who allows the remote listening of SDR receivers, evista focutod de Ingenieria (Fac. Ing), Enero-Ala 2015, Yo. 26, No. 38 Fic, 12. SDR Touch Visual Interface 9 SDR in the Web SDR’s perspectives in the future are many and varied, but its application is particularly important when Internet connected systems are brought ‘nto consideration. From this point of view, there are two fundamental approaches: 1. Transmission aver Intemet of own SDR signals, 2. Free access to foreigners SDR in remoie locations For the transmission of a local own signal (approach 1) the software rt_tep may be used. With two PCs, a hub and SBR RTL 2831 the possibility to visualize daia received through the network was verified However, when a laptop was added as a third active element, the disadvantage of the scheme became evident: only one remote host can receive the signal at agiventime. There are two solutions to the problem evista Facultad de Ingenieria Fac. ng.), Enero-Aterd 9015. Vol. 24, No. esd Pal Moe rindee + Place several SDR devices in a centralized server so cach remote may have access to a different one, This can be made because of the low prices of the SDR hardware available on the market, However, note that the alternative requires some centralized service that should act as a judge and mule the access to various devices connected + Establish a Limux server responsible for handling requests to a single device, This application already exists Both options are viable, being the selection conditioned by the necessities of each particular user However, ifthe conditions are given, the second-one is recommended over the first Regarding the free access to foreigners SDR in remote locations (approach 2), it needs to be let clear that this alternative is equally or more valuable than the previous. Worldwide, there are a lot of SDR devices ruled by amateur users and nonprofit associations, The geographical location of all 79 stations is provided in Fig. 13 [70] Asthe reader may notice, the majority of the receivers, are located in Europe, although there are stations in all continents. The operating bands and the signal's quality offered by the deployed devices differ from ‘one location to another, understandable fact if the spontaneous nature of the network is considered However, by accessing several terminals, multiple bands can be covered, especially in high density areas Software Defined Radic: Basic Principles end Ppalicctions Fic, 13.SDR Receivers around the world ‘The SDR Intemet transmission possi above leads to consider the following applications of Anteni the technology: + Estimation of Wireless ‘Transmission Losses: Providing centralized control of several SDR devices deployed at strategic locations enables the comparison of received signals, which allows the estimation of path loss and the Antenna Validation of the eoverage computations made Y with specialized software like RadioMobile (71) + SDR asaservise: The Corporation that achieves Fig, 14, Location of unknown transmitters from at least deploying a large SDR network will be able 10 thre different locations, Provide access to the receivers as a service to third parties with specific interests. evista focutod de Ingenieria (Fac. Ing), Enero-Ala 2015, Yo. 26, No. 38 + Radiogoniometry: Location of emission’s source using information supplied by several receivers located at distant positions If at least three of them are used, the location of a radiofrequency source can be accurately determined. However, the application is not directly usable with the software presented + Improvement of Shortwave Communications Using remote SDR receivers, shortwave twansmissions can be heard even from distant countries. Thus, HE communication reception quality may be improved through Internet. + Spectrum Exploring: The listen to specific bands in remote locations can be useful for many organizations, TV, Conciusions SDR technology has many applications in radio environments and is becoming increasingly popular among all type of users. While the frst projects were unstable, there are eurrenily a lot of frameworks that allow the manipulation of radio signals only with a petsonal computer and an inexpensive SDR device such as the Teratee RTL2831U. The applications are multiple Besides providing a very cheap radio receiver, SDR devices can be combined with free software to facilitate examination of the spectrum detection of interferences, assigning of frequency distributions in an efficient manner, testing repeater systems’ operation and measuring their electrical parameters, identifying speetrum intruders and. characterization of noise by bands and regions of the world, In addition, SDR versatility envisions its possible application in the improvement of shortwave communications, Similarly, the continued growth of the SDR with workdwide available receiving points announces the formation, in a not too distant future, ofa vast network through which it will be possible to listen to radio broadcast on any part of the world by: using Internet Revista Focttad de Ingenieria Fac. ng.), Eneroeftord $015, Vol 94, No. 38 g I BI [a] (5) 1} a [8] [9] [lo] i (12) 113] José Pall Machase-Ferndindes REFERENCES PK. Bondyopadhyay and G Marconi, “The Father of Long Distance Radio Communication = An Engineer's Tribute”, Proceedings of the 251h European Microwave Conference, vol. 2. pp. 879-885, 1995. ©. U. Press, A Tower in Babel: A Hisiory of Broadcasting in the United States to 1933 ,1966. J. J. Green, “The Apparatus for Wireless Telegraphy”, American Elecirician, pp. 344- 346, 1898 D. Raychaudhuri and NB. Mandayam Frontiers of Wireless and Mobile Communications”, Proceedings of the IEEE. 2012 0. U. Press, “The Image Empire: A History of Broadcasting in the United States from 1953", 1970, L. Kleinrock, “An Early History of the Internet”, JERE Communications Magazine. wol. 48, pp. 26-36, 2010. N. Abramson, “Development of the ALOHANET’, EEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 31. pp. 119-123, 1985, R. Frenkiel, “Creating Cellular A history of the AMPS project (1971-1983)", JEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 14-24, 2010. U_ F.C. Commission, “Authorization of Spread Spectrum Systems Under Parts 15 and 90 of the FCC Rules and Regulations”, General Docket, pp. 81-413, 1985 IEEE, “802.11 IEEE Standard for Information Technology. _‘Telecommunications and Information Exchange Between Systems, Local ane Metropolitan Area Networks. Specie Requirements, Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physieal Layer (PHY) Specications”, 1997 G, Youngblood, “A Software-Defined Radio for the Masses, Part 1”, QEX: A Forum for Communications Experimemters, 2002. J. Mitola Ill, “Software Radios. Survey. Critical Evaluation and Future Directions", JEEE National Telesystems: Conférence, pp. 13-18, 1992, R J, Lackey and D. W. Upmal, “Speakeasy the Military Software Radio”, JEEE Software Defined Radia: Basic Prixicles ene Picotions 04) 07) 0) 09) 0) 1) p2] B3) 4) B35] 6] p71 Bs] p93] 24 Communications Magazine, vol. 33, pp. S6-61, 1995. (August 2014). SDR-Sharp Oficial Web Site Available: http://sdrsharp com! (August 2014) RTLSDR Scanner GitHub reference. Available: —_btp:/github.com/ EarToEarOak/RTLSDR-Scanner (August 2014) Amazon, Venta de Hardware SDR — Available: up ¢iwwwamazon com! Terratec-Reveiver-Low-Cost-Sofiware-Defined! product-reviews/ BOOCRDFSWQ A.B Carlson, Communications Sysiems An Introduction to. signals and Noise, 4th ed. MeGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2002 J.D. Gibson, The Communications Handbook, ed: CRC PRESS, 2002 RH. Hosking, Software Defined Radio Handbook (Notes Gathering), 8 ed. 2010. J.B. Anderson and J. Rolf, Understanding Information Transmission: [EEE Press, 2005, ¥. Giannini, J. Craninekx, and A. Baschirotta, “Baseband Analog Circuits for Software Defined Radio”, ed: Springer. 2008, B Sklar, Digital Communicatinos Fundamentals and Applications, 2 ed.’ Prentice Hall, 2001 (August 2014). Comparisons with other Wideband Commercial Software Defined Radios. Available: htp:/iwwwrll-sdr com! about-rl-sde! G.D. Space Systems Technology Group, “New Research Lab Leads to Unique Radio Receiver”, EsSystems Team magazine, vol. 5, pp. 6-7, 1985, (April 2012), National Instruments Corporation Hestory, accessed Available: http /Awww ni com/ ‘companyhistory: him “Design and Implementation of Software Radios Using a General Purpose Processor”, PhD., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1999. R Vidano, “SPEAKeasy II: an IPT Approach to Software Programmable Radio Development”, MILCOM 97 Proceedings, vol. 3. pp. 1212- 1215, 1997. (1997, April 2012). Mission Needs Statement (NMS) for the Joint Tactical Radio (JTR) P. Mackenzie, L. Dayle, K. Nolan, and D. O'Mahony, “An Architecture fir the Development of Software Radios on General Purpose Processors", Proceedings of the Trish (30) GI (321 B31 Ba] BSI B6] BT (a) Bo [40] (il (2) Signals and Systems Conference. pp. 275-280, 2002 VG. Bose, “A Software Driven Approach to SDR Design”, COTS Journal, 2004 (April 2012), GNU Radio Wikipedia Entry Available: htp:/en wikipedia org/wiki/Gnu S-L. Tsao, CC. Lin, CL Chiu, HL. Chou, and M,C. Wang, “Design and Implementation of Software Framework for Software Defined Radio System”, Proceedings of the 56th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, vol. 4, pp. 2395-2399, 2002 GJ. Minden, J. B. Evans, and JA. Roberts, “Agile Radio Systems and National Radio Networking Research Testhed”, SensorNet Architecnure Forum, Lawrence, KS, USA, 2003. (April 2012), Calradio User Guide. Available hitp:/ealradio calit2.neteatragio!a him P. Murphy, A. Sabharwal, and B. Aazhang, “Design of WARP: A Flexible Wireless Open- ‘Access Research Platform”, Proceedings of ‘Mth European Signal Processing Conference. 2006 (April 2012). High Performance Software Defined Radio Website, Available: butp/ copenhpsdr.org/history php JA. DePries, “A Practical Approach to Rapid Prototyping of SCA Waveforms”, Master, Virginia Polyteehnie Institute and State University, Blacksburg. Virginia, USA, 2006. (February 2007), LyrtechSFF SDR Development Platform Technical Specs, Technical Report. Available: hitp:/fwww lyrtech: com/publications/ sff_sdr_dev_platform_en pdt T. W. Rondeau, “Application of Articial Intelligence to Wireless Communications”, PhD., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, WA, USA, 2007, K. Mandke, 8. H. Choi, G. Kim, R. Grant, R Daniels, W. Kim, RW. Heath, and. M. Nettles, “Early Results on Hydra: A Flexible MAC/PHY Multibop Testbed”, Proceedings of the 65th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, pp. 1896-1900, 2007 1G. Miguelez, “A Software Framework for Software Radio", Master, Universidad Politécnica de Catalufa, Barcelona, Espata, 2008 K Tan. J. Zhang, J. Fang, H, Lis ¥. ¥e,S, Wang, Y Zhang, H. Wa, W, Wang, and G, M. Voelker, evista focutod de Ingenieria (Fac. Ing), Enero-Ala 2015, Yo. 26, No. 38 (431 [44] “Sora: High-Performance Software Radio Using General-Purpose Multi-Core Processors”, 6h USENLX Symposium on Nenwarkedl Systems Design and Implementation, 2009. (2009, April 2012). Native Imerface berween MATLAB / Simulink and USRP. (April 2012), MATLAB ane Simedirk Support Package for USRP Hardware ‘Available: hupi/iwww mathworks com!matlabcentraly [45] 461 “7 [48] [49] [so] (su) (52) (53) Revista Focttad de Ingenieria Fac. ng.), Eneroeftord $015, Vol 94, No. 38 95 linkexchange/links/2973-matlab-and-simulink- support-package-for-usrp-hardware D. Valerio, “Open Source Software- Defined Radio- A survey on GNUradio and its applications”, Technical Report. Donaueitystrasse 1. 1220 Vienna, AUSTRIA, 2008, D.C Tucker and G. A Tagliarini, “Prototyping vwith gnu radio and the ustp = where to begin’, SOUTHEASTCON 09. IEEE, pp. 50~54, 2009. S.J. Olivieri, “Modular FPGA-Based Software Defined Radio for CubeStats”, Master, Worvester Polytechnic Institute, 2011 R. Sivappagari and C. Mohan, “Software Defined Radio using Digital Modulation Techniques - A MATLAB SIMULINK Approach”, Proceedings of International Academic Conference an Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering, 2013, K. J.T. Hazim Salah Abdulsatar, Ali Hashim Jryian, “Low power Transceiver Structure for Wireless and Mobile Systems Based SDR Technology Using MATLAB and System Generator”, fnvemational Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technotogy (WEAT), vol. 3, 2013, Z Feng, “A Software Defined Radio Implementation Using MATLAB", Graduated, 2013 S. Gulichey, K_— Moessner, and _D. Thilakawardana, Evaluation ofSofiware Defined Radio Technology. Centre for Communication System Research, University of Surrey. 2005 N. Hariza, M. Kassab, and R. Knopp, “Multi- technology vehicular cooperative system based on Software Defined Radio (SDR) Communication Technologies for Vehicles, pp 84-95, Springer, 20 J. Seo, Y-H. Chen, and B.S. De Lorenzo, “A Real-Time Capable Software-Defined Receiver [54] [55] [36] (37) 158] [59] (60) [61] (62) (63) [64] José Pall Machase-Ferndindes Using GPU for Adaptive Anti-Jam GPS Sensors". Sensors Journal. 2011 PB Nagaraju, E. Koski, and T Melodia, “A Software Defined Radio lonospherie Chirpsounder for HF Propagation Analysis” 2009, HLS. Yoo, B. Park, and S-H_ Kim, “Seamtess Vertical Handover in Software Defined Radio Terminal”, feternational Journal of Contral and Automation, vol. 2, 2009 M, Zahangir Alam and M. Abdus Sobhan, “Design of Future Sofware Defined Radio (SDR) for AILIP Heterogeneous Network”, Recent Patents on Signal Processing, vel. 2, pp. 12-21, 2010. P Vinayakray Jani, “Algorithm Driven System Selection with Reconfigurable Software Defined Radio in Mobile Devices”. international Journal of Wireless & Mobile Networks, vol. 2. 2010, A. Technologies, “Creating and Analyzing Custom OFDM Waveforms for Software- Defined Radio (SDR) Application Brief”, 2010. M, Islam, M.A. Hannan, S. A. Samad, and ‘A. Hussain, “Software Defined Radio for RFID Application”, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Compuier Setence 2009, vol. 1,200. M_L. Diekens, BP Dunn, and J. N. Laneman, Design and Implementation of a Portable Software Radio”, /EEE Communications Magazine, vol. 46, pp. 58-66, 2008, J.P Jacky, J. L. Garbini, M, Ettus, and J. A. Sidles, “Digital Control of Force Microscope Cantilevers Using a Field Programmable Gate Array”, Review of Scienuic lastrumenns, vol. 79, 2008 E. Malls, 7. Corket, and $. Gogineni, “Plasma ‘Anemometer for Hypersonic Mach Number Experiments", Insirumentation in Aerospace ‘Simulation Facilities, pp. 245-256, 2005 R Farrell, M_ Sanchez, and G. Corley, “Software-Defined Radio Demonstrators An Example and Future Trends”, Jnternational Journal of Digital Multimedia Broadcasting. vol. 12, 2009, GJ Bradford, “A Framework for Implementation and Evaluation of Cooperative Diversity in Software-Defined Radio”, Master, University of Notre Dame, 2008. Software Defined Radia: Basic Prixicles ene Picotions [65] J. G. Q Maguire, “Cognitive Radio: Making Software Radies More Personal”, JEEE Personal Communtcations, wol. 6, pp. 13-18, 1999. [66] NM. Josuttis, The C++ Standard Library = A Tutorial and Reference, 2 ed.» Addison-Wesley Professional, 2012 [67] N. Savage, “Special Reports on Emerging Technologies: Cognitive Radio", MIT Technology Review, 2046 [68] JEG Minden, 1. Seatl,, “Cognitive Radios for Dynamic Spectrum Access: An Agile Radio for (9) (70) ir Wireless Innovation”, IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 45, pp. 113-121, 2007 (August 2014), Recopilaetin de Apps SDR para Androide. Available: bup shwww radioclubfene net/index.php/hf-vhf-ubfesht/59-recopitacion= de-appsede-radio-para-android (August 2014). Web SDR around the Workd. Available: hp //websdr orgy (August 2014). Radio Mobile Oficial Website Available: hup://wwweplus.org/english! him! 96 evista focutod de Ingenieria (Fac. Ing), Enero-Ala 2015, Yo. 26, No. 38

You might also like