Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views2 pages

No 22

The document describes the results of two t-tests. The first compares test scores between students who learned with Method A versus Method B, and finds a significant difference between the means. The second compares pre-test and post-test scores from a training program and also finds a significant difference between the means, indicating the training was effective. Both analyses reject the null hypothesis of no difference based on the t-stat falling below the critical value.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views2 pages

No 22

The document describes the results of two t-tests. The first compares test scores between students who learned with Method A versus Method B, and finds a significant difference between the means. The second compares pre-test and post-test scores from a training program and also finds a significant difference between the means, indicating the training was effective. Both analyses reject the null hypothesis of no difference based on the t-stat falling below the critical value.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Gwyn Irish G.

Abanador Maam Karen


Quino
10-Einstein 10/23/23

T- Test Problem Set.


1. Our hypothetical scenario is that we are comparing scores from two teaching methods. We
drew two random samples of students. One sample comprises students who learned using
Method A while the other sample learned using Method B. These samples contain entirely
different students. Now, we want to determine whether the two means are different.

t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances

Method A Method B
Mean 71.50206667 84.74266667
Variance 88.63167407 69.0553781
Observations 15 15
Pooled Variance 78.84352608
Hypothesized Mean Difference 0
df 28
t Stat -4.08371361
P(T<=t) one-tail 0.000167795
t Critical one-tail 1.701130934
P(T<=t) two-tail 0.00033559
t Critical two-tail 2.048407142

Analysing Result

If t Stat < -t Critical two-tail or t Stat > t Critical two-tail, we reject the null hypothesis. The data that
was calculated showed that -4.0837<-2.048.The t Stat is less than the -t Critical two-tail. Therefore
we reject the null hypothesis.

Conclusion

In conclusion, there is a significant difference on the students that are using Method A with the
students that are using Method B in terms of their scores.
2. Imagine that we have a training program, and we need to determine whether the difference
between the mean pretest score and the mean posttest score is significantly different.

t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means

Pretest Postest
97.0626666
Mean 7 107.8346667
106.216992
Variance 4 175.4698267
Observations 15 15
Pearson Correlation 0.57450724
Hypothesized Mean Difference 0
df 14
t Stat -3.73418008
0.00111091
P(T<=t) one-tail 4
1.76131013
t Critical one-tail 6
0.00222182
P(T<=t) two-tail 8
2.14478668
t Critical two-tail 8

Analysing Result

If t Stat < -t Critical two-tail or t Stat > t Critical two-tail, we reject the null hypothesis. Based from the
data that we have gathered through data analysis, it showed that -3.7342<-2.145. Meaning that the t
Stat < -t Critical two-tail. Therefore we reject the null hypothesis of the given.

Conclusion

Therefore, there is a significant difference between the mean pretest score and the mean posttest
score that was taken.

You might also like