Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

Scribd
Upload
39 views1 page

CIC - Results Analysis

This document compares the carbon emissions of two design options (Design A and Design B) for a proposed residential development with the same floor area. Design A would result in total carbon emissions of 25,981 tCO2e while Design B would emit 27,285 tCO2e, for a difference of 1,304 tCO2e more for Design B. The main contributions to emissions for both designs are from reinforcement bar, concrete, and timber formwork used in temporary works. Design A performs better in terms of total and normalized carbon emissions per square meter.

Uploaded by

jennyngaec
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
39 views1 page

CIC - Results Analysis

This document compares the carbon emissions of two design options (Design A and Design B) for a proposed residential development with the same floor area. Design A would result in total carbon emissions of 25,981 tCO2e while Design B would emit 27,285 tCO2e, for a difference of 1,304 tCO2e more for Design B. The main contributions to emissions for both designs are from reinforcement bar, concrete, and timber formwork used in temporary works. Design A performs better in terms of total and normalized carbon emissions per square meter.

Uploaded by

jennyngaec
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Select a Design Option

Comparison Table

Design A Design B

(Design) Proposed Residential Development at Shap Pat Heung Road (Baseline) Proposed Residential Development at Shap Pat Heung Road
Project Name and Tai Tong Road, Yuen Long, New Territories (Site A) and Tai Tong Road, Yuen Long, New Territories (Site A)

Project Type Building

Project Classification Residential (private)

Project Sub-Classification

Project CFA 369,310 (m²) 369,310 (m²)

Design Life 50 Years 50 Years

Total Carbon Emission tCO2e

Design A: Permanent Works  13,419 tCO2e Design B: Permanent Works  Reinforcement Bar 13,510 tCO22e

 12,123 tCO2e  Concrete 13,336 tCO 2e

 0 tCO2e  0 tCO2e

 0 tCO2e  0 tCO2e

 0 tCO2e  0 tCO2e

Design: Temporary Works  439 tCO2e Construction: Temporary Works  Timber Formwork 439 tCO2e

 0 tCO2e  0 tCO2e

 0 tCO2e  0 tCO2e

 0 tCO2e  0 tCO2e

 0 tCO2e  0 tCO2e
e₂OCt

Design Construction

Performance

Design A Design B Di erence

Total Carbon of the Project (tCO2e) 25,981 tCO2e 27,285 tCO 2e 1304 tCO2 e

Normalised Carbon of the Project (tCO2e/(m²)) 1 tCO 2e 1 tCO 2e 0 tCO2 e

© 2019 Construction Industry Council. All rights reserved. Support

You might also like