OTROSPROCESOS
OTROSPROCESOS
ROBERTO GAUASSO
ProcessDevelopmentDepartment
INTEVEP, S.A.
ABS11I.Acr:The research and development activities carried out by INTEVEP. S.A. for the upgrading
of heavy oils and residual s are summari~. These activities originated four process schemes
in 1983. and two commercial processes in 1987. The information obtained frorn these activities
allowed me development of other processes and provided INTEVEP with important know-how.
The majo scientific results are analy~. centering the discussion in me contributions associated
with the HR. HH. SHH and DHDS processes.
- Zone of separation of catalysts from liquid and gaseous processes.Since the HDH processis dealt with in another
products. When a catalyst remains in the reactor, the only article ofthis issue[2). it will only be mentionedbriefly.
separation that has to be made, by conventional means, is that
of gases (non-condensable) from liquids, an operation which 2. CHARACTERIZATION AND REACflVITY
does not require any special equipment. But when the catalyst OF EXTRAHEA VY CRUDES
leaves the reactor together with the liquid products, they have
to be separated. If their density is not different, the separation The Orinoco Gil Belt' s extraheavy crudesarecharacterized
requires special methods, and developments have to be made. by aspecific gravity higherthan I.aresiduecontent higherthan
- Liquid product purification and separation zone. Insoluble 6Owt %. a metal content higherthan 400ppm. mainly vanadium
materials must be eliminated from liquid products in order to and nickel. and an asphaltene content higher than 12wt %.
seUthem or recycle them into fue reactor. Generally speaking, In 1977. substantial efforts were made with a view to
fue purpose is to limit as much as possible fue formation of developing anaIyticaI techniquesfordeep crude characterization
insoluble materials in the chemical reaction stage SOthat the with the API 60 project. Particularly. techniques for the
separation stageswiU be conventional ones and less expensive separation and characterization of heavy fractions of light
(such as the case of atmospheric and vacuum distiUation). crudes were established and applied. INTEVEP. together with
- Product hydrotreatment zone. The quality of fue products the US DepartmentofEnergy (DOE). beganthe characterization
is adjusted here, and in somecasesthe conversion into distiUable of Cerro Negro crude. The first work made by Sánchez.
products is completed. In fue caseof distiUares,the hydrotreating Murgia. Lubkowitz el al. [3] presentedthe main characteristics
technology requires fewer developrnents than in the case of of these heavy materials. A strategy was designed for the
residues (total or deasphalted); if there are metals, special analysis of feedstocks and conversion products. After a
processes are required. distillation stageof up to 700°C. a preparatory chromatography
The five process schemes studied from 1977 were as with exchange ionic columns is carried out to obtain acid
foUows: fractions. bases. and hydrocarbons. Various fractions with a
1- Elimination of most of the metals through deasphalting content of nitrogen. acids and phenols can be obtained from
to proceed to demetaUization and hydrotreatment of the acids through a silica preparatory chromatography. The second
deasphaltedproduct (DHDS process).A synthetic crude family (bases) can also be separated into basic compounds of
and asphalt are produced. different sizes and structures with the sametype of column and
2- Treatment of complete residue or fue crude through a group of solvents. The third family is separatedjoto aromatics
dernetaUization stage, foUowed by a hydrotreating of different sizes with a silica column and a special stationary
stage in order to produce distiUates and non-con verted phase. The Nipper 160 report deepensthe study of the routine
residual (HH process). distillation and characterization stage. Nipper 161 develops
3- Treatment of the residue or the complete crude in two the improvements made in the separation and identification of
thermal stagesfor their hydroconversion, foUowed by a aromatics. Reports 322. 323 and 324 complement the
product purification stage and hydrotreatment of characterization ofbasic acid compoundsand aromatics. Report
distiUates (SHH process). DistiUates and a residual are 325 anaIyzes sulfur distribution.
produced. Cerro Negro crude contains 18.2% of acids. 17.6 % of
4- Treatment ofthe crude or its residual in a hydrocracking bases. and 14.7wt % of hydrocarbons. The latter contains
stage, foUowed by a catalyst separation stage, and cycloparaffins. Most of the aromatics are neutral poI yaromatic
hydrotreatrnent of distiUates (HDH process). Non- compounds. whose molecular weight grows continuously
converted material mayor may not be recycled. toward heavier fractions. This is the case of sulfur. whose
5- Residual treatment in a first dernetaUization stage, distribution is discontinuous. with a minimum in the diesel
foUowed by a thermal hydroconversion stage, and fraction. It is important to point out the high proportion of
afterwards, through hydrocracking, distiUates, wbich naphthenic acids in the heavy gasoil [4].
are hydrotreated, and a residual (HR process) are AIl characterization technologies dealt with distillates. but
produced. they gave no information on most of the crude. that is. the
Particular developments were made in each scheme, residue. That is why a study was initiated on heavy crude
especiaUy catalysts and reactors. AU the zones are analyzed separations through the SARA method and high pressure
below, starting with the feedstocks, foUowed by conversion liquid chromatography [5).
catalysts and reactors, and finaUy the purification of products In terms ofthe process.the study ofthe molecules containing
and the hydrotreabnent of distiUates. Finally, a summary is vanadium and nickel is of paramount importance to understand
made of the developrnents of DHDS, HH, SHH, and HR hydrocracking and demetallization reaction mechani~m~. For
t Upgrading processes
3. HYDROTREA TMENT CA T AL YSTS these feedstocks in long tests, made it possible to make the
necessary changes in the fonnulation.
The development in the afea of catalysts was simultaneous
to the study of the characterization of heavy crudes. This Demelallizalion Synlhelic Calalysls INT -RI and INT -R7
development was initiated in three main afeas: synthetic
catalysts. natural heterogeneous catalysts. and homogeneous Catalyst INT -R 1 was developed for the demetallization of
catalysts. The first one could have been designed according to residues (HH process) and deasphalted (HDS process); this
the requirements. but they were expensive andodue to their was prepared with a Ketjen alumina support through
deactivation. it was necessary to consider the possibility of impregnation with molybdenum and nickel. This catalyst is a
regenerating them. The second one could have been produced result of a long process of selection of supports to adjust the
with elernentsthat abound in nature. through simple procedures. porous distribution to a binodal system with pare diameters
but with limited important Stnlctural changes. and since their between 30 and 300 A.
preparation was economical. it was not necessaryto regenerate The demetallization of feedstocks with a different active
them. phasecomposition was studied through porphyrin adsorption,
In 1977. a large proportion of research efforts in the world whose molecules contain vanadium and nickel, in arder to
was centered on the development of demetallization synthetic detennine the necessary composition and dispersion [14].
heterogeneous catalysts for commercial units and for most Likewise, the preparation was analyzed by making adsorption
developing processes.It had beenestablished that the selection isothenns of the precursor (Mo, Ni) with different salts,
of an adequate pare size made it possible to penetrate heavy concentrations and acid or basic media, and checking its
molecules inside the pares, where they reacted in active sites. dispersion by means ofphotoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). In
giving a good vanadium and nickel dispersion, along the radius so doing, it was detennined that it was possible to obtain
of the particle. These metals were deposited inside the particles. maximum activity if the molar ratio Mo/(A 1) = 5 to 8 andNi/
~
~
in active sites or nearby, and deactivated the catalyst with a (AI)= 1 to5.
decrease of the number of such sites, and of the effective The first results were obtained by Morales el al. in 1978
I diffusivity of the reactives due to the reduction of pare size. [ 15], and its application was demonstrated in pilot plant tests of
Taking this aspect into account. there were two application seven months duration, up to a metal accumulation of70wt %.
manners: flrst of all. as small-size particles that could operate [16-17]. This catalyst is being sold today at intemationallevel.
in a fixed bed; nevertheless, the catalyst had to be changed after Likewise, a variation of this catalyst was prepared.
~, Phosphorus was added to its fonnulation in arder to increase
, a certain amount of vanadium accumulation. A variant of this
,
. altemative consisted in continuously rernoving the catalyst the mechanical strength and removal capacity of Conradson
~ from the reactor operating in a mobile bed or ebullated bed. carbon and hydroconversion (INT-R2) [18].
The second type of application was as a finely divided or Thedevelopment afilie secondcatalyst (INT -R7) started in
homogeneous catalyst. which was handled in suspension. and 1980,associatedwith the HR process.The support was obtained
which could be used in transported red reactors or in with INTEVEP's technology. The product obtained was an
suspensions. The use of hornogeneouscatalysts allowed for a alumina support with a binodal pare distribution and with a
higher contact efficiency at the expense of considerable special adsorptioncapacity [19-20]. Ittumed out that vanadium
separation difficulties. The catalyst design is associated with can have basic absorption sites in the support, so that not all the
the technology that is being used, and is influenced by the vanadium will deposit on the active metal phase, and the
functioning of such technology. catalyst will have a longer liCeoThe hydrogenation active phase
It was also known that molybdenum, cobaltonickel andoto is a molybdenum and nickel sulfide, which was optimized for
~
~ a certain extent, vanadium in the sulfide statecould dernetallize residue of Bachaquero and Tía Juanacrudes, whose reactivity
~ the residues. but no appropriate hydrotreatment and is different from that of the Orinoco Oil Belt 's crudes, in which
1 hydrocracking catalysts were known. the reactivity of the INT -R 1 is lower. The optimum pare
i
t INTEVEP started the development of hydrotreatment and distribution is still binodal. but the macropores have a wider
¡ hydrocracking catalysts by selecting and activating natural diameter to allow for the accessof vanadium molecules. The
1: material available in Venezuela. Likewise. synthetic supports optimum metal dispersion is now Mo/(A 1) =4.5-7.5 Ni/(A 1)=
were prepared and obtained from cornmercial manufacturers 3-6. and the acidity distribution is such that it has a higher
(AKZO, CY ANAMID. FIL TROL). which were impregnated numberof intennediate acidity sites than the INT -R 1measured
with active metals. Later. their optimization was started so as by arnoniadesorption. Thiscatalyst was studied in longduration
to apply them to specific technologies. Kinetic studies for tests with residue 500°C+ of Bachaquero Crude, and
particular feedstocks and the analysis of the peñorrnance of demonstrated that it had good stability.
Thanks to basic studies aimed at understanding the of heavy feedstocks. Both are used after the feedstock is
interaction among organometallic compounds of (he crude and partially demetallized with the synthetic catalysts mentioned
the catalysts. it wasdemonstrated [14-21] that porphyrins were above. This is because vanadium prefers highly acid sites.
adsorbed preferably in the molybdenum sulfides. through the which are necessaryforconversion. a situation that deactivates
interaction of vanadium with these sulfides. Additionally. it them rapidly. The initial studies with these material s were
was demonstrated that neither the cobalt nor the nickel played made by Arias ~I al. [30-31]. who worted with bauxites. iron
any important role in demetal1ization reactions. The importance and nickel-containing laterites. These materials were activated
of diffusional controls in the reaction was also analyzed. in such a way as to generate the best pare distribution possible
Galiasso and Morales [22] analyzed the diffusion of and an adequate suñace composition.
porphyrinic and non-porphyrinic species to determine their Arias and Rivas [32]. on the one bandoand Arias. Kum and
effective diffusion coefficient. GonzáJez and Galiasso [23] Galiasso [33]. on the other. initiated the development and the
modeled the activity and selectivity results in demetallization catalytic test of catalyst INTBHC-l. incorporating different
vs. desulfurization of residues by applying the concept of a active materials. which were impregnated to fonn the active
structure interconnected in a probabilistic manner for (he phase together with the components present on the suñace of
diffusion path in the pares. and established the importance of the Venezuelan baux ileso This study was continued by Garcfa
the size distribution of as'phaheneparticles in the activity and ~tal. [34]. whoadded phosphorus tothecatalystandoptimized
selectivity. the preparation method. In particular. they produced spheres
Likewise. (he aging of (he catalyst was analyzed by using and extruded particles through a special treatment which
deasphalted feedstocks of Jobo crude [24] and of complete changed the mesopore distribution. while retaining high
crudes [25-26]. and (he effect of cake and vanadium in the mechanical strength. The good Ktivity of these catalysts
i., deactivation was demonstrated by a loss of effective diffusivity pointed to the possibility of hydrocracking heavy crudes as a
and intrinsic activity. Particularly. it was established that the first or a second stage.
three catalyst deactivation periods and (he selectivity depended Kum ~I al. [35] studied the demetallization of Jobo crude.
.1..
on the parameters for a given porous structure. The catalyst was assessedon fixed and ebullated red at bench
Galiasso eral. [27] studied the surface ofthe fourcatalysts scale for its application in the HR or HH process. respectively.
used. and the activity as whole particles and as powder in arder CataIyst INTBHC-l was also tested in the pilar plant of
to clarify separately the effects of diffusion and intrinsic Lummus in New Jersey. U.S.A. [36] on an ebullated red with
activity ofthecatalyst with theJoboresidue. It wasdemonstrated Cerro Negro residue and crude. The results were successful.
that the deactivated catalyst. operating as whole particles. has dernonstnting the high activity and stability of this catalyst.
a 20% of initial molybdenum on the surface. while its activity The second catalyst.INTLHC-l. was developed by Garcfa
is only 10% of (he initial activity; nevertheless. after being ~I al. [37] with a Venezuelan nickel-containing laterite which
grinded. it still has 50% of the initial activity. which indicates was properly activated. impregnated with molybdenum and
that the plugging of the structure in the pare interconnection extruded in various proponions with a macroporous alumina.
zones is the causeof the premature deactivation. The difference This catalyst proved to have more hydrocracking activity than
in reactivity causeshigh reactivity molecules to dernetallize by commercial catalysts [351. high macroporosity. a layer
the mouth of the pares. and low reactivity ones to diffuse in the structure and an adequate substitution of magnesium for other
pares. This explained (he need to use graduated beds of ions. which makes it possible to create acidity coming from
catalysts with different pare distribution and activity in arder metals. necessary for asphaltene hydrocracking.
to treat those types of molecule with the objective of obtaining These twonatural catalysts (INTBHC-I and LHC-I) were
an appropriate life-span for the catalyst system. characterizedby RamírezandGalarraga [38]. whodetennined
On the other hand. Agudelo et al. [28] demonstrated that the suñace composition. metal dispersion. acidity and the
elements Mo. Ni. Cr. and V are the most active ones for crude valence state of the active elements.
dernetallization. Finally. Quintero and Galiasso [29] developed The catalysts already used in the reaction were
a procedure for catalyst regeneration through cake oxidation characterized by Galiasso t't al. [391. who realized that the
and treatrnent with a selective solventowhich makes it possible total acidity had decreased to a feeble acidity. attributed to the
to remove vanadium from the catalyst used. cake. and a medium acidity. attributed to the metal sulfides.
Fony percent ofthe sulfides had been eliminated by coverage.
Catalysts /NT8HC-I,/NTLHC-/ with a 60% reduction of the mesopores and almost all the
micropores elimination. The cok e produces the main
These natural catalysts were developed for the deactivation (20 wt %). and vanadium to a lower degree
hydrodesu Ifurization. hydrodemetallization and hydrocracking (7 wt %).
GALIASSO
Upgrading prOC~SMI
Upgrading processes
Ebullated 8ed Reactor size as a function of the gas linear velocity in the reactor. To
that end. they used model molecules (air-kerosene) and tracers
This type of reactor was developed by the companies HRI, in a cold model with one or various gasdistribution plates. This
City Service and Lurnmus, which havebuilt severalcornmercial is important for the contact between the homogeneouscatalyst.
units under the process name of H-Oil and LC Fining. fue water steam and (be hydrogen controls the coke forrnation.
Originally, the idea was to apply this technology with Cotte and Galiasso [57] perforrned fue process tests in a high
INTEVEP's catalysts in the form of spherical or cylindrical pressureand temperature unit. which was designed and built to
particles. The advantage of this system is that the selectivity evaluate the effects of operational variables on the stability
of the reactions and the vanadium deposition in the catalyst can (coke forrnation). It wasdemonstratedthat waterand a minimum
be controlled better than in the fixed bed becausethe catalyst hydrogen-feedstock ratio had a favorable effect on a low coke
is suspended and works at constant temperatures and and rnesophaseforrnation.
concentration. Therefore, the removal and addition of the The works conducted by Salazar and Huskey [58]. which
catalyst is simple, which allows for a constant vanadium were canied out in fue same unit for longer periods. showed
content in the reactor during the operation cycle. that feedstockpreheatingis a critical stage.becausefue forrnation
At INTEVEP, it was necessary to test the catalyst and the of coking precursors regios during vaporization. The study on
process in a bench scale unit. To this end, it was necessary to the hydroconversion reactor was complemented with a
have equipment capable of simulating the industrial reactor. A helicoidal tubular reactor. in which feedstock preheating is
continuous agitated tank-type reactor with a special internal done in a fiírnace. in fue presente of water and a homogeneous
was designed and built, in which the catalyst was suspended. catalyst [58].
The first designs were tested by Baudet [53], who optimized,
in cold equipment, different forms to tluidize the catalyst 5. EXTRACrlON OF ASPHALTENES AND
without fines or dead zones being formed. Later, Caprioli et al. INSOLUBLES BY SOLVENT SEPARAll0N
[54] designed and built a high pressure plant with that reactor. STAGE
Its operability and the reproducibility of the results were
demonstrated for different operation conditions. Caprioli and Due to the fact that asphaltenes and resins constitute a
Galiasso [55] analyzed tluid dynamic problems with chemical problem in the processingofheavy crude residues,the possibility
tracers, and determined transfer constants for hydrogen and a to deasphalt them was anaJyzed to facilitate upgrading. In
model molecule, from the tluid phase to the catalyst. The 1976, even though there was abundant infonnation on the
possibility to improve the internals of the commercial system deasphaJtingprocess with light solvents, propane and butane,
was confirmed. In the higher zone, where the catalyst is little was k-nown about heavy crude processing. The initial
separated from the liquid and the gas, a new detlection plate works were conducted by Aquino el al. [59-61J, who showed
was designed, which could make the separation in a highly that heavy solvents allowed for a selective extraction of
efficient manner, so as to prevent the salid from being dragged asphaJtenesand increased the yield of high metal content
with the liquid to the external recirculation parto In so doing, products (in regios) and Conradson carbono As a consequence,
the liquid drag is also reduced through the gas that leaves from from 1979, INTEVEP developed a deep deasphaIting process
the top of the reactor. in which participated Aquino, Rodríguez, Granados, Solari,
and Krasuk [62-63 J. Their main conhibution wasto demonstrate
Two-Phase-Bubbling-Column-Type Reactor the feasibility of deasphaIting with heavy solvent to produce
solid asphaltenes with a limited particle size, which could be
Two phasestlow upstream in this reactor: hydrocarbon and transported in a suspension fonn. To control the particle size,
hydrogen. lt is characterized by the fact that liquid and gas a tlocculation stage was developed, in which a particle size
contents depend on the hydrocarbon properties and the gas wider than 10 microns was obtained in the separation stage,
velocity. By 1981, when INTEVEP developed the SHH through temperature and residence time. Fig. 2 shows the
hydroconversion process, several studies had already been scheme of this process. A preliminary technical-economic
done in the world on model molecules (airor hydrocarbon), but study for commercial application [64] was initiated, whose
there was little information on its application to heavy crude resuIts made it possible to detennine the feasibility of its
hydroconversion. intemational commercialization [65]. The deep deasphaIting
Studies were initiated on the tluid dynamics, taking into associated with a deasphaIteddemetallization led to the DHDS
account existing knowledge on visbreaking with soaker type process.
reactors (Lummus technology). Thus Barbarrosa, Huskey and Simultaneously, a study was initiated on the possibility of
Galiasso [56] determined the mixing degree and the bubble decreasing resins and asphaItenes prior to the deasphaIting
stage through a hydroconversion process. As for the SHH successfully dernonstratedby Drago el al. [70J. whoconducted
process, Huskey and Aquino [66J demonstrated that, after a tests on a pilot scale and cornmercial scale.
hydroconversion stage, asphalteneswould deasphalt by means
of a heavy solvent and water. The results were promising, for 6. PRODUcr HYDROTREA TMENT
the low resin amount, the presenceof cake microparticles and
of a mesophase facilitated the separation of particles such as Since its beginnings, INTEVEP has been doingimponant
small size solids. Later, the deasphalting prior to visbreaking work in the hydrotreating afea. First of all, experimetal facilities
was evaluated together with the Institut Fran~ais du Pétrole were completed and a study of commercial catalysts for
(IFP). With this institute the "INTEVEP path" was studied, refinery's feedstocks was initiated, with works conducted by
which consisted in a hydroconversion followed by a pentane García and pazos [71-72] and pazos et al. [73]. The best
deasphalting (IFP process), and hydrotreatment of the experimental conditions were established for the kinetic
deasphaIted oil and the distillates with INTEVEP's catalysts evaluation ofthe activity, and studieswere madeof die properties
[67). The results suggestedthat from the technicaI and economic of the catalysts having more influence on the commercial
viewpoint, it was an interesting way for the Orinoco Oil Belt' s application. Later, deactivation and economic. evaluation
heavy crudes [68J. As ~ result, the two companies would concepts were incorporated for the selection of commercial
proceed to commercialize it. catalysts. Within this frarnework, Salazaret al. [74] developed
an accelarated deactivation test and established the parameters
influencing the activity and the stability of the catalysts. A
methodology was established to Speedup aging and to make it
possible to evaluate the catalyst activity cycle in 45 days. This
was later complemented by Salazar, González, and Rodríguez
[75]. During thedeveloprnent ofthe processschemes,distillated
products were hydrotreated to improve their quality by using
cornmercial catalysts and the technology mentioned above.
These studies made it possible to evaluate the performance of
these feedstocks coming from hydroconversion and
hydrocracking processes [76].
Since 1984, within the framework of the Venezuelan-
German agreement (Annex IlIb), studies were made of the
behavior in hydrotreating of naphthafractions, kerosene,diesel,
and heavy gasoil coming from the Orinoco Oil Belt's Morichal
Fig. 2. neasphaltingprocessin a solid phase.
crude, which had been produced through delayed coking,
Coker, Veba Combi Cracking processes and simple direct
Another way to optimize deep deasphalting processeswas distillation. It was found that the reactivity in hydrotreating
coking of sol id products. To that end, together with Lurgi and depended on the characteristics and origin of the feedstock.
within the cooperation frarnework with the German government, According to the characteristics of the conversion process, the
studies were made of the feasibility of using LR Coker reactivity of the cut produced ch~ges for cataJysts and
technology with asphaltenesproduced in the IFP's pilot plant cornmercial hydrotreating operation conditions. Rodríguez et
in Solaize, France. The distillates produced with this process al. [77] obtained kinetic expressionsfor die hydrodesulfurization
were hydrotreated at INTEVEP. Aquino and Solar [69] of thesefeedstocks, in which the reaction order and deactivation
demonstrated that the process was feasible and that it was did not depend on the feedstock, because its effect was taken
possible to improve the liquid yield thanks to a 50% solids into account by means of a parameter adjustable in terrns of its
conversion (asphaltene) joto distillates. Lurgi and INTEVEP aromatic contento The other properties of the products were
patented the process scheme. established in terms of operation severity and amount of sulfur
Finally, several studies were carried out topurify, bymeans removed.
of solvents, streams from hydrocracking reactors in arder to With the inforrnation collected, Rodríguez, García and
sell free-of-solid residues (coke and catalyst microparticles) or Badra built data bases which store most of the inforrnation
to recycle non-converted material into the hydrocracking stage. obtained at INTEVEP and Petróleos de Venezuela subsidiaries
The ideas developed in the case of deep deasphalting could be [78]. Likewise, a seriesof correlations was developed between
applied in this case with special equipment to separatethe sol id feedstock quaJity, operation conditions, type of catalyst and
from the non-converted hydrocarbon (residues). This was product propenies. These correlations made it possible to
simulate the performance of units and/or catalysts. Design scheme did not require any change of scale. becauseboth the
programs for hydrotreating vacuum naphtha, diesel and gasoil ebullated bed reactor and the fixed bed reactor had been tested
units were written, which led to the development of a manual at cornrnerciallevel. Operation temperature ranged from 390
on cracked feedstock hydrotreating units (79). This knowledge to 4300 C. and pressure between 130 and 150 alm. Space
allowed Badra el al. (80) to prepare the design bases for the velocity was 0.4-0.7. and hydrogen-feedstock ratio was I.(xx)
HDH process hydrotreating unir. which were used to draw up and 2.(xx) N 1/1.Fig. 3 shows the processschernein which none
the basic engineering. of the stages.apan frorn the reactor, needsany special studies,
Likewise, efforts were made to develop INTEVEP's own since they are conventional as far as hydrocracking operations
hydrotreatment catalysts. From 1981, Morales, Satazar, ~coocemed.
Agudelo, Manínez and Carrasquel developed moderate
hydrocracking and hydroteatment catalysts to treat cracked
gasoil called INTGOV-IOandINTGOV-20,respectively (81).
These catalysts proved to be highly stable in situations of
desulfurization and conversion thanks to a surface composition
where there is a molybdenum, nickel orcobaltand phosphorus- I
I 1
--
based active phase. Lo-
I - -- - - _.~~~!!'~\1 \ 1
1 :
Galiasso el aJo(821 summarized the main mass and surface
characteristics of commercial catalysts, and demonstrated that r---'
there was no direct con'elation between a particular property Fig. 3 HH PnM:essScIIeme.
and the activity or selectivity in desulfurization and
denitrogenation. They also demonstrated that a catalyst whose The results suggested that from an 80 API virgin Cerro
weight has increased by 6-9% with cake during the first days Negro crude a good quality synthetic crude could be obtained
and then operates for several years, has surface properties with variable API gravily between 27 and 34. depending on the
different from those of fresh catalysts. This same aspect was severity. containing less than 1% of sulfur and 50 ppm of
analyzed by Galias~ 1831,who studied several commercial vanadium, the residues conversion being 5W C+ between 80
catalysts which have worked fordifferent periods in industrial and 85 wl %. The prodUCIslate showed a formal ion of 10% of
Unil'i. The acidity reduction and accessible metal content in gasoline. 25% of diesel. 40% of vacumm gasoil. and 25% of
these catalysts were demonstrated. The acidity of original residual volume; this distribution corresponds lo the mínimum
commercial catalysts was sudied by Ayerbe el al. (841 and conversion. If increa.'ied.by recycle or notogasoline produclion
Gajardo el al. 1851,who confirmed that a proper balance of would increase.
acidity and metal dispersion can produce a catalyst with an The process wa.~tesled at bench scale wilh one-month long
adequate activity in conversion and desulfurization. Morales tests for lhe hydrocracking stage. and one-month for lhe
el al. 186-871 demonstrated that phosphorus control s the demetallization stage. Nevenheless. lhe laner stage had been
catalyst'!i acidity and metal di!ipersion. lesled for seven monlh~ wilh a non-hydrocracked residue. The
On the other hand, Martínez el al. (881developed a catalyst hydrocracking stage was alS() lested in Lummus 3 bpd pilol
for moderate hydrocracking a.1ipart of the development of the plant with INTEVEP'~ catalyst 1901. During the process
conversion technology for ga.'ioil~ in diesel. Prada. Romero development. new element~ were generated ~uch a.~catalyst
and Muñoz made another highly hydrogenated hydrocracking and reactor array wilh or wilhout recycle.
cataly~t: INTHHC-I 1891, which make~ it po!i~ible to treat
conver!iion product~ by !iaturating the aromatic~ and reducing Dt'asphallinx and HydrlJdt'.\"u/furi:alinn PrlH't'.\".\"
(DHDSJ
nitrogen and ~ulfur to minimum value~.
Thi~ processis ba~d on a deepcrude or re~iduedea.~phalling
7. PROCESSES TO UPGRADE HEA VY ~Iage followed by hydrotrealmenl of the dea...pi1altedoil.
CRUDES Dea~phalting i~ done with heavy !iOlvenl~ (C".). and Ihe
a~phallene~ separation is carried out in a !iOlid phase in
HydrrJdemelCJllizCJlirln
CJndHydrr/("'CJ('kin.l,'
Prr/('e,\',\'(HH) accordance wilh the pruce~s~hown in Fig. 2. Once the ~olvent
is recovered. Ihe dea~phalled product obtained from the
Thi!i proce!i!icon!ii!it!i ba!iically()ftwo !itage!iwith orwith()U\ cenlrifugal ~"Iing tank is treated in two ~tages.()f1eof which
recycle()fnon-convened produc\!i: unebullated hydrocrucking deal~ wilh the demetal I i.,.ationand the other, which is in ~erie~.
()rIc. which u!ie!icataIY!i\MoP/bauxi\e(INTBHC.1 ).undam)\her with Ihe de~ulfuri.,.alion. From an Ho API Cerro Negro heavy
in a fixed hed with cataIY!i\ NiM(~AI (INT -R 1). Their pnx.'C!i!i crude 12.4'~, of ga.'i()line. J l. 9~, of diesel. 2H~, of vacuum
UpgrQdin.~ proc't'sst's
gasoil, and 11.6% of residue volume are obtained. The yield of together with distillated products in a conventional
asphalt is 13.5 wt % of feedstock. The total product has 210 hydrotreatment stage. or recycled into the second
API, 0.65 wt % ofsulfur. 15 ppm ofmetals and less than 1 wt hydroconversion reactor. This reactor usesup to 10% of water
% of asphaltenes. Deep deasphalted pressure ranges between with the feedstock and 500-1(XX) ppm of a molybdenum
4 and 15 bar, temperature between 20 and 1500C, and solvent/ additive. This additive. as well as most of the vanadium. is
feedstock ratio between 4/1 and 9/1. Hydrotreatment is done recovered from the solid precipitate obtained in the purification
underpressure of approximately 100atm, variable temperatures stage (solid combustion and ashes extraction). Fig. 5 shows
between 375 and 4300 C. and LHSV between 0.4 and 0.7 h-l. the process scheme. The operation temperature of the first
Hydrogen/feedstock ratio is I,OOONI/I. Thecatalystofthefirst reactor is variable. between 400 and 4600 C. the operation
stageis INT -R 1and thatofthe secondstageis a HDS commercial pressure is between 130 and 150 atm. and the residence time
catalyst. The deasphalted product is hydrotreated on a fixed rangesbetween 10and 25 minutes. The secondreactoroperates
bed, this being demonstrated in tests lasting longer than three at a variable temperature. between 400 and 4600 C, and
months. basically under the same pressure as the first reactor. The
A second version of the same process (Fig. 4) uses a separating unir operatesat the sametemperature and under the
preliminary stage ofhydrovisbreaking, which improves yields same pressure as the second reactor, and the liquid phase
and the metal content in the'deasphaltedproducto The treatment purifier at 500 C and under a pressureof 150 atm. The solvent
iscarried out underpressures in theorderof 1OOatm.at variable recovery stage occurs at the same temperature. but under less
temperatures between 400 and 46()° C, and residence time of pressure. The hydrotreatment of each of the units is done
several minutes [91]. Someaspectsofthe processare protected according to the need to adjust the properties of the distillates.
by patents 163,92]. The SHH processproduces. 13.51% of gasoline. 43.56% of
New aspects of this process are associated with deep diesel. 37.50% of heavy gasoil and 5.43 wt % of residue from
deasphalting and demetallization catalysts. an 80 API Cerro Negro crude. The conversion and quality of
a synthetic crude increaseswith recycling. Conversion is in the
order of 90% and production of insoluble solids less than 5 wt
% [93-94]. The SHH process [95-96] has been tested at bench
scale in 20-day tests. Nevertheless. the reactor's operation in
co. appropriate f1uiddyanmic conditions hasnotbeen demonstrated
at bench scale.
The technological contributions ofthis processare the type
of reactor used. the use of homogeneous additives. and the
product treatment for the additive recovery and the production
of a free-of-solid residue.
,~" c Upgradingprocellel
14. MORALES, A.; GALIASSO, R. Adsorption Mechanismof 28. AGUDELO. M. M.; GAJARDO. P.; GONZALEZ. R. The Role
BoscanPorpiIyrinson MoO3Co)0and CoMo/AI20) Catalysts. ofTransition Metal Sulphides in Hydrotreatment 1.1ron Sulphide
u Catalyst Preprints ACS. Div. Pet. Chem. 27 (3): 712-722.
Fu~/. 61 (1): 13-17,1982.
ISo MORALES, A.; GALIASSO, R.; CARRASQUEL, A. R.; 1982.
SALAZAR, J. A. USA Catalystfor RemovingSulfur andMetal 29. GALIASSO. R.; QUINTERO. N. Extracción de vanadio en
Contaminantsfrom Heavy Crudes and Residues.Pat~nt N'. catalizadores de demetalización. Technical Note project
RPOO2JK.INTEVEP. S.A. Los Teques. 1982.
4642/79. 1987.
16. MORALES, A.; GALIASSO, R.; CARRASQUEL, A. R. 30. ARIAS. B.; LARRAURI. l.; GALlASSO. R. Bauxitas y lateritas.
Catalizadorpara la hidfodesulfuracióne hidrodesmetalización Technical Note project RP002PA. INTEVEP. S.A. Los Teques.
simultáneadecrudospesados.R~v. Tic. /nt~p, 3 (2): 135-140. 1979.
1983. 31. ARIAS. B.; LARRAURI. l.; GALIASSO. R. USA
MORALES, A.; GALIASSO, R.; AGUDELO, M. M.; Hydrotreatment Catalyst. Patent N9 4465784. 1984.
17.
SALAZAR, J. A.; CARRASQUEL, A. R., USA Processfor 32. ARIAS. B.; RIV AS. L. Caracterización de bauxitas. Technical
Demetallizationof Heaf/yCrudeusinga CatalystHaving High Note NV~15 project RPOO2PA.INTEVEP. S.A. Los Teques.
Metal Retention Capacity and Good Stability, Pat~nt 1981.
N' 4579649.1986. 33. ARIAS. B.; KUM. H.; GALIASSO. R. USA Method of Prepar-
MORALES, A.; GALIASSO, R.; AGUDELO, M. M.; ing Hydrocracking Catalysts. Patent N9 4632414. 1986.
18.
SALAZAR, J. A.; CARRASQUEL,A. R. USA Cata1ystHaving 34. GARCIA. l.; GALIASSO. R.; AGUDELO, M. M.; RIV AS. L.;
High Metal RetentionCapacityand Good Stability. Pat~nI N' HURTADO. l.; USA Catalyst and Method of Preparation from
Natural Ocurring Material. Patent N9 47014035. 1987.
4520/28. 1985.
19. ARIAS, B.; MARTINEZ, N.; REYES, E. D~sarrollo d~1 35. KUM. H.; GARCIA. l.; MORALES, A.; CAPRIOLI. L.;
GALIASSO. R.; A YERBE. A. Hidrotratamiento de crudos
catalizador d~ hidrod~smetalización para tratami~nto d~
pesados y ~iduos. Rev. Técn. lntevep, 5 (1): 17-27. 1985.
r~siduo/~s.Technical Report. N° INT-O1487,85. INTEVEP,
S.A. Los Teques,1985. 36. LUMMUS. LC Fining of Atmospheric and Vacuum Cerro Negro
ARIAS, B.; MARTlNEZ, N.; REYES, E. D~sarrollo d~1 Resid Reportfor
S.A. Los Teques.lNTEVEP.
1983. S.A. Reponproject
. 8018. INTEVEP.
20.
catalizador de hidrometa/izaciónpara tratamiento de resi-
duo/es.Tcchnica1Report.NO1NT-O1715,86.INTEVEP,S.A., 37. GARCIA. l.; RIVAS. L.; HURTADO. l.; GALlASSO, R.
Desarrollo del catalizador LEC -1.TechnicalNoteproject8051.
Los Teques,1986.
21. ANDREU, P.;GALIASSO, R.; MORALES, A.; ABRAMS, O.; INTEVEP. S.A. Los Teques. 1986.
KATAN, L.; PANTOJA, L.; SOlO, P.; VERGARA, E. 38. RAMIREZ. M. M.; GALARRAGA, C. Caracterización
Adsorption Mechanismof BoscanPorphyrinson Hydrodeme- fisicoquimica de cata/izadores naturales de hidroconversión de
tallization Catalysts.l.Adsorptionon suppon.In Proceedingsof residuoles. Technical Repon NVINT -O1692.86. INTEVEP. S.A.
th~ 7th /nt~rnationalCongresson Catalysis.KodanshaUd. 7th Los Teques. 1986.
IntemationalCongresson Catalysis,Tokio; pp. 877-886.June 39. GALlASSO. R.; G AR CIA. l.; RAMIREZ. M. M. Caracterización
3O-luly 4. 1980. de catalizadores naturales desactivados en corridas de larga
22. GALIASSO, R.; MORALES, A. Diffusion of Vanadium duración. Technical Note project 8051. INTEVEP. S.A. Los
arganometallic Molecules in Hydrodemetallization Catalysts. TeqUt;.5.1986.
R~v. Tic.lnt~v~p. 3 (1): 59-68. 1983. 40. MORALES. A. Hidroconversión de-f:rudos pesados. Technical
23. GONZALEZ, C.; GALIASSO, R. A Mathematical Modello Repon NV 1NT-8021-O3. INTEVEP, S.A. Los Teques. 1981.
Sludy the Effecl ofPore Structure in Ihe Activity and Selectivily 41. TORRES. E.; SALAZAR, l. A. Estudio comparativo de aditivos
of HDS/HDM Catalysts. Rev. Ticn.lntev~p. 3(1): 3-9. 1983. para sMprimir laformación de coqueen el proceso SHH. Technical
24. GAUASSO, R.; GARCIA. l.; CAPRIOU, L Porphyrim and lXX1 Repon INT -00700.83. INTEVEP, S.A. Los Teques. 1983.
POIphyrlns MoI«:uJes RelM::tionsduring H~lizatjoo of 42. GALIASSO. R.; GAlARDO. P.; SALAZAR. l.A.
Heavy Crudes,PreprintsACS. Div. Pet Chem. 30( 1): 50-61. 1985. Caracterización de precursores del catalizador homogéneo del
25. GALIASSO, R.; BLANCO, R.; GONZALEZ, C.; QUINTERO, proceso SHH. Technical Note project 8021. INTEVEP. S.A. Los
N. Deactivation of Hydrodemelaltizalion Catalyst by Pore Teques. 1982.
Plugging. Fu~/, 62 (7): 817-822.1983. 43. NUÑFZ. A.; GALIASSO. R. Hidrocraqueo de asfalteno en
26. VELAZCO, L.; GALIASSO, R.; OCHOA, O.; ANDREU, P. presencia de agua deulerada y naftenatode molibdeno. Technical
Efecto del tamaño de poros del catalizador en la desactivación de Note NVRPDP/2-O77. project 8021. INTEVEP. S.A. Los Teques.
calalizadores de hidrodemetalización de crudos pesados 1980.
venezolanos. Acta C;~ntlfica V~n~zolana. 32138-143,1981. 44. SALAZAR. l. A. Efecto de la hidroconversión térmica en el
27. GALIASSO, R.; GONZALEZ, C.; CAPRIOLI, L.; GARCIA, l. taponamiento del lecho cata/ltico. Technical Repon NV802 lOS.
l.; AGUDELO, M. M. Envenenamiento de catalizadores de INTEVEP. S.A. Los Teques. Marzo 1983.
4S. CO1TE. E. Inlorm~ 2final d~sarrollo d~1 proc~so d~ de desasfaltación profunda con .reparaciÓII~ asfalteno.r enfas~
hidrocroqu~o con Qg~nJ~donant~ d~ hidróg~no. Technical Note .rólida. Technical Repon NV INT-OI122, 84. INTEVEP, S.A.
INrEVEP. S.A. Los Teques. 1981. Los Teques, 1984.
46. LURGI GMH. Donor SoIwnJ Hydrovisbr~aking. Final Note. 63. KRASUK, J.; SOLARI, B., AQUINO, L.; RODRIGUEZ.J. V.;
ConvenioVenezolanoAIemM.Anexolvol.B4. 103-109. 1981. GRANADOS, A. USA Solvent Deasphaiting in Solid Ptwe.
47. GARCIA. W.; PAZOS. l. M. Effect of the Mean P8I1icle Size Pate1ll N9 4572781. 1986.
and Liquid Velocity on the Peñonnance of Trickle Red 64. AQUINO, L.; GRANADOS, A.; SANCHEZ. J.; RAMIREZ. L.
Laboratory ReactOr!. Rt'V. Tkn.lnJ~'~, 3 (1): 47-54.1983. Prediseño ~ IUIQ planta ~ 25.fXXJ bp.sd ~ d~.rasfaltación
48. BELANDRlA. l.; GALIASSO, R.; NUÑEZ. A. D~.sarrollo d~ proftmda COlt.reparaciÓII~ asfalteno.r enfa.re .rólida. Technical
un r~actor "trick/~ bed" con r~tiro d~ catalizador. Technical Repon NV INT -01126, 84. INTEVEP, S.A. Los Teques. 1984.
Note project 80S l. INTEVEP. S.A.. Los Teques. 1984. 65. THE NW KELLOG. T~c/utical and Economical Stlldy of
49. GALIASSO. R.; BELANDRlA. l.; CAPRIOu. L. U.S.A. INTEVEP Of'ep Deaspilalting Proc~.fS.Report Number J 6689,
Method Cm'WidMb8wing Paniculale SoIid fnMn a Higb Preu~ Housroo, Texu. 1986.
Vessel. Pat~nt NW4664762. 1987. 66. HUSKEY, D.; AQUINO, L. De.ras!altación de lo.rproducto.r d~
SO. HIDALGO. R.; GALIASSO, R. E/~cto d~ la dir~cción d~1flujo hidroconwr.riÓII. TechnicaJ Note project 8021.INTEVEP, S.A.
~n rHccion~s d~ hidrotratamienJo en "Qctor~s trifdsicos. Los Tequea. 1983.
Technical Report. N9 1NT-O1243. 8S. INrEVEP. S.A. Los 67. HUSKEY, D.; AQUINO, L. Re.rultMo.r preliminare.r ~ la
Teques. 1985. t'valuaciÓllt«nica de la rllla INTEVEP ~ mejoramiento d~
S l. DI MARCO. M. P.; CABRERA. L. Influencia del s~nJido d~ crudos pe.rado.r. TechnicaJ Report NV INT -O 1618, 86.INTEVEP,
flujo en hidrotratami~nJo de r~siduos. Technical RepoI1. N9 S.A. Los Teques. 1986.
INT -O1887. 88. INTEVEP. S.A. Los Teques. 1988. 68. AQUINO, L.; SOLARI, B.; HUSKEY, D. Convenio de
S2. BELANDRlA.l.; MAYORGA.P.DeSQ"oIlodeun"actor~n cooper8Ción de INTEVEP.ASV AHL; evaluaciÓII de la ruta
lecho móvil con r~tiro d~ catalizador. Final ~ agreement INTEVEP de mejorami~nto~ crudo.rpe.sados.TechnicaJReport
ULA-INTEVEP. project 80S l. INTEVEP. S.A. Los Teques. NV 1NT-O1619, 86.INTEVEP, S.A. Los Teques, 1986.
1989. 69. INTEVEP, S.A. LIlrgi GMH LR Coking of A.rpltaltene -
S3. BAUDET. A. Estudio fluidodinálnico de un reactor de l~cho V~1an Gem1an Agreement. Final Repon U/KYEOS/I.
ebull~nt~ para ~l hidrocroqu~o de crudos ~sados. BS Thesis. Caracas-Frankfun, 1987.
Chemical Engineering. Univ. Metropolitana. Sep. 1982. 70. DRAGO, G.; AQUINO, L.; SOLARI, B.; SOUTO, A.;
54. CAPRIOLI. L.; KUM. H.; GALlASSO. R. D~sarrollo de la GONZALFZ. C.; KRASUK, J. U.S.A. Recycle Uncorvened
etapa de hidrocraqwo en It'CM ~/enJ~ del proceso HH. HydrocrKked Residual to Hydrocr8Cker alter Removal of
Technical Repon. N9 1NT-00707. 83. INTEVEP. S.A. Los Unstable Poly Nuclear Hydrocarbons. Pat~ntN9465590J. 1989.
Teques, 1983. 71. GARClA, W.; PAZOS, J. M. Catalizadores y condicione.r de
SS. CAPRIQLI. L.; GALlASSO. R. FluiJodinámica de "actor~s operación para el hidrotratamiento d~ gasó/eo.r ~ voc(o.
en I~CM ebull~nI~, Technical N- ~ject 8018. INTEVEP. TedU1jcal RepwtNVlNT.ros 17,82INTEVEP ,S.A. LosTeq~,
S.A. Los Teques. 1982. 1982.
56. GALIASSO. R.; HUSKEY. D.; BARBARROSA, l. Simulación 72. GARCIA, W.; PAZOS, J. M. Actividad dt' catalizador~s
fuidodin4mica de un reactor de hidroconvenión a escala conll'rciale.r de hidrod~.rulf.,ración d~ gá.roleo.r d~ ~'ac(o.
IabcM'atorio.Rt'V. Tkn./nlevep. 7 (1): 33-41. 1987. Technical RepwtNV80I302INTEVEP,S.A. LosTeques, 1981.
S7. CO1TE. R.; GALIASSO, R. Pr~liminary T~st 01 73. PAZOS,J.M.;GONZALEZ,J.C.;GARCIA, W.EVQluaciÓlld~
Hydrovisbr~aking lor the Se/~ction of two Crude Oils to be la actividad d~ calalizadon.r de "idrod~.ru/fllración d~ ga.róleos
T~st~d with the Kombi and DSV Processes. Par1 l. Technical d~ voc(o. Technical Repon NV 802201 INTEVEP, S.A. Los
Repon. NV INT ~. 82. INTEVEP. S.A. Los Teques. 1982. Teques. 1982.
SS. SALAZAR. J. A.; HUSKEY. D. Techllical Not~ project SO21. 74. SALAZAR, J. A.; GONZALEZ J. C.; RODRIGUEZ. E.;
Vol. 1, Chapter 3. INTEVEP, S.A. Los Teques, 1982. MORALES, A.; GALIASSO. R. Desarrollo de un test de
S9. AQUINO. L. Desasfaltación d~ crudos ~SQdos venezolanos. desactivación acelerada para Mild Hydrocracking. In Prim~r
BS Thesis Chemistry, Univenidad Central de Venezuela. s~minari() de rf'/inaciÓII de la indllSlria fWlro/~ra nacional. Vol.
~as. Julio 1977. l. T. 3.CORPOVEN. S.A. Primerseminarioderefinación de la
60. AQUINO, L. Desasfaltac;ón d~ tr~s r~s;duos d~ crudos ~sados industria petrolera nacional, Valencia, Venezuela. Noviembre,
usando h~xano como solvenJ~. Technical Note project 8021. 22-24, 1984.
INTEVEP. S.A. Los Teques. 1980. 7S. SALAZAR, J. A.; GONZALEZ. J. C.; RODRIGUEZ. E.
61. AQUINO.L.;PACHANO.J.;RODRIGUfZ.l. V.; KRASUK. D~.rarro/lo d~ un '~Sl d~ d~saclivación ace/~rada para
l. D~asplWllt;ng C~"o N~gro Cogollar andJohoCrIIde Oil with calalizadore" ~ /tidroc-raqwo .ruaw. TechnicaJ Report NVINT -
Propan~ and H~xan~. Technical Rep>n N" 17.KX)2INTEVEP, 01713, 87.INTEVEP, S.A. Los Teques, 1987.
S.A. Los Teques, 1979. 76. DRAGO, G.; GONZALEZ, R.; MATAMOROS. N. Oplimiza-
62. AQUINO. L.; GRANADOS. A.; RODRIGUEZ, J. V. Proc~.r(1 ciÓII de la ftO/Nl d~ hidrmratamit'nl(} ~n ~I proc~.ro HDA.
Upgrading proct'sst's
TechnicalReponNVINT-02030,88.INTEVEP.S.A.Los Teques, 91. AQUINO, L.; GONZALEZ. F.; PACHANO, J.; PINZON, P.;
1988. RODRIGUEZ, J. l.; SOLARI, B.; ZERPA, C. Proceso DHDS
77. RODRIGUEZ. E.; BADRA. C.; GALIASSO, R. Correlaciones de mejoramiento de crudos pesados TechnicaJ Repon NQINT -
de hidrotratamiento para destilados no convencionales. 00657, 83. INTEVEP, S.A. Los Teques, 1983.
Technical Repon N° 1NT-O194S, 88. INTEVEP, S.A. Los 92. PACHANO, J.; GUITIAN, J.; RODRIGUEZ, O.; KRASUK, J.
Teques. 1988. U.S.A. Multiple Stepped Process for Demetallization and
78. BADRA. C.; RODRIGUEZ. E.; CABRERA. L. Manejo de las Desulfurization ofHeavy Feedstocks. Patent ~ 4752376. 1988.
bases de datos de hidrotratamiento. Primera versión. Manual 93. SALAZAR,J.A.; HUSKEY, D. Resu/tadosjina/esde/proceso
N9 INT -M-<XXX>30.88. INTEVEP. S.A. Los Teques, 1988. SHH. TechnicaJReportNQINT-00662, 83. INTEVEP, S.A. Los
79. BADRA, C.; RODRIGUEZ. E.; LOPEZ. R.; DIAZ, D.; DI Teques, 1983.
MARCO, M. Manual de diseño de unidades ~ hidrotratamiento 94. GALIASSO, R.; SALAZAR, J. A.; HUSKEY, D.
Tome I (to be published).INTEVEP, S.A. Los Teques, 1m. Hydrovisbreaking ofCerro Negro Crode Oil,J. Pet./nst., 28 (2):
80. BADRA, C.; SALAS. R. Especificaciones ~ proceso de una 54-62, 1985.
unidad de hidrotratamiento de gasóleos de vac(o de H DH. Caso 95. GALIASSO, R.; SALAZAR, J. A.; MORALES, A.;
base. El Palito. Technical Report N" INT -O1808.87 .INTEVEP, CARRASQUEL. USA Hydroconversion ofHeavy Crudes with
S.A. Los Teques. 1987. High Metal and AsphaJtene Content in the Presence of Soluble
81. MORALES, A.; SAL~ZAR. J. A.; AGUDELO. M. M.; Metallic Compound and Water. Polen! ~ 4592827. 1986.
MARTlNEZ, N.; CARRASQUEL. A. R. USA Catalyst for 96. GALIASSO, R.; SALAZAR, J. A.; HUSKEY, D.; MORALES,
Hydrocracking of Heavy Vacuum gas Oj)o Patent N' 4600703. A. Canada. Processforthe Conversion of Asphaltene and Resins
1986. in the Presence of Steam Ammonia and HYdrogen, Paten! ~
82. GALIASSO. R.; GARCIA. W.; DE AGUDELO. M. M.; /208590. 1986.
ANDREU, P. Hydrotreatment of Cracked Light Gas Oj), Catal 97. CAPRIOU, L.; KUM,H.; NUÑEZ. A. Desa"ollode un esquema
RevSci Eng. 26 (3-4): 44S-480. 1984. de conversión para e/ procesamiento de cargas residuo/es.
83. GALIASSO. R. Desactivación de catalizadores de parte /. Technical Repon N1IINT-OI066,84. INTEVEP, S.A.
hidrodesulfuración. Plenary Meeting. vrn Encuentro nacional Los Teques, 1984.
de Catálisis IUT Miranda. Marzo loS, 1987. 98. KUM, H.; NUÑEZ, A.Desarrollode un esquemade conversión
84. A YERBE, A.; RAMIREZ, M. M.; MORALES, A. para e/ procesamiento de cargas residuo/es. parte //. Technical
Hidrotratamiento de gasóleos pesados 111. Influencia de la Report N1IINT-O1701, 86.INTEVEP, S.A. Los Teques, 1986.
acidez sobre el hidrocraqueo suave. 2do. Congreso Franco 99. ZERPA, C.; DI MARCO, M.; NUÑEZ, A. Desarrollo de un
Venezolano (Francia),Ruej)Malmaison.124-1~.Abril,1985. esquema de conversión para e/ procesamiento de cargas
8S. GAJARDO, P.; A YERBE. A.; RAMIRFZ, M. M. Correlations residuo/es. TechnicaJ Report N1IINT -O1920,881NTEVEP , S.A.
between surface properties and catalytic activiry of comrnercial Los Teques, 1988.
hyd~ating cataiysts: An XPS and ESR study. In Proceedings 100. ZERPA, C.; DI MARCO, M. P.; GALIASSO, R.; GARCIA, A.;
8th. Int. Congo Catal.. Verlag Chemie. 8th Int. Congo Catal.. ARIAS, B. Hydrodemetallization and Hydroconversion ofTía
Weinhein, Rep. Fed. Germany; 3SI-361. 1984. Juana Heavy Vacuum Residue with Dual Catalysts System.
86. MORALES. A.; RAMIREZ. M. M.; HERNANDEZ, F. Preprints ACS, Div. PetoChern. 32 (2): 464-69. 1987.
Adsorption Mechanism of Phosphorous on Alumina. Applied 101. GONZALEZ. G.; VILERA, M. V.; PARES, G. Desarrollo de
Catalysis.41: 261-271.1988. un esquema de conversión de residlllJ/es. Factibi/idad ticnico-
87. RAMIREZ, M. M.; MORALES, A. Promotor Effect of económica del proceso /NTEVEP HDS. Technical Report NQ
Phosphorous in NiMoP/AIZO) Catalysts on Hydro- INT-01867, 88.INTEVEP, S.A. Los Teques, 1988.
denitrogenation Reactions. In Proceedings IXth International 102. GALIASSO, R.; CAPRIOLI, L.; KUM, H.; GARCIA, J. USA
Congresson Catalysis,Vol. 2. M. J. Phillips y M. Teman (Ed.) Process for the Conversion of Heavy Hydrocarbon Feedstock
IXth Intemational Congress on Catalysis, Calgary; págs. 42-5S. Characterized by High Molecular Weight, Low Reactivity and
Octubre, 24, 1987. High Metal Contento Patent N9 4.62634. 1987.
88. MARTINEZ, N.; VELASQUEZ. J.; REYES. E.; LUJANO. L.;
RODRIGUEZ. E.; SALAZAR. J. A.; CARNA. W.; ZERPA, C.;
GALIASSO, R. Desarrollo de catalizadores ~ hidrocraqueo.
Technical Repon INT -O1217, 84. INTEVEP, S.A. Los Teques,
1984.
89. PRADA, R.; ROMERO, Y.; MUÑOZ, R. Desarrollo del
catalizador INTHHC-2. Technical Report (to be published)
INTEVEP, S.A. Los Teques,1989.
90. GALIASSO. R.; KUM. H.; CAPRIOLI. L. Proceso HH para el
mejoramiento de crudos. Technical Repon N° INT -00660. 83.
INTEVEP, S.A. Los Teques, 1983.