MAKING THE RECORD

By: Robert N. Udashen*

A trial lawyer has two jobs: 1) to persuade the jury of the justness of his client’s cause;

and 2) to make a record that will lead to a reversal on appeal in the event that the jury remains

unpersuaded at the end of the trial. Unfortunately, the second job is often short-changed by

lawyers who consider themselves trial lawyers but not “book” lawyers. Unless you are a lawyer

who never loses a trial, it is very dangerous to ignore the obligation to make a record. If you do

not make a proper record during the trial, you better persuade the jury to rule in your favor.

Otherwise, your client will have the unsatisfying experience of losing twice, first at trial and then

on appeal.

Making a proper record requires a familiarity with the Rules of Appellate Procedure and

the Rules of Evidence. There are two rules in particular that provide the broad outlines of

preserving a point for appeal. The first is Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 33 which reads as

follows:

33.1 Preservation; How Shown

(a) In general. As a prerequisite to presenting a complaint for appellate review,
the record must show that:
(1) the complaint was made to the trial court by a timely request,
objection, or motion that:
(A) stated the grounds for the ruling that the complaining party sought
from the trial court with sufficient specificity to make the trial court aware of the
complaint, unless the specific grounds were apparent from the context; and
(B) complied with the requirements of the Texas Rules of Civil or
Criminal Evidence or the Texas Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure; and
(2) the trial court;
(A) ruled on the request, objection, or motion, either expressly or
implicitly; or
(B) refused to rule on the request, objection, or motion, and the
complaining party objected to the refusal.

?
* Robert N. Udashen is a partner in the Dallas law firm of Sorrels & Udashen, 2301 Cedar

Springs Road, Suite 400, Dallas, Texas 75201. Sorrels & Udashen is on the web at

www.sorrelsudashen.com.
-1-
(b) Ruling by operation of law. In a civil case, the overruling by operation of
law of a motion for new trial or a motion to modify the judgment preserves for
appellate review a complaint properly made in the motion, unless taking evidence
was necessary to properly present the complaint in the trial court.
(c) Formal exception and separate order not required. Neither a formal
exception to a trial court ruling or order nor a signed, separate order is required to
preserve a complaint for appeal.
(d) Sufficiency of Evidence Complaints in Non-Jury Cases. In a non-jury case,
a complaint regarding the legal or factual sufficiency of the evidence -- including
a complaint that the damages found by the court are excessive or inadequate, as
distinguished from a complaint that the trial court erred in refusing to amend a
fact finding or to make an additional finding of fact -- may be made for the first
time on appeal in the complaining party’s brief.
33.2 Formal Bills of Exception. To complain on appeal about a matter that
would not otherwise appear in the record, a party must file a formal bill of
exception.
(a) Form. No particular form of words is required in a bill of exception.
But the objection to the court’s ruling or action, and the ruling complained of,
must be stated with sufficient specificity to make the trial court aware of the
complaint.
(b) Evidence. When the appellate record contains the evidence needed to
explain a bill of exception, the bill itself need not repeat the evidence, and a party
may attach and incorporate a transcription of the evidence certified by the court
reporter.
(c) Procedure.
(1) The complaining party must first present a formal bill of exception to
the trial court.
(2) If the parties agree on the contents of the bill of exception, the judge
must sign the bill and file it with the trial court clerk. If the parties do not agree
on the contents of the bill, the trial judge must -- after notice and hearing -- do one
of the following things:
(A) sign the bill of exception and file it with the trial court clerk if the
judge finds that it is correct;
(B) suggest to the complaining party those corrections to the bill that the
judge believes are necessary to make it accurately reflect the proceedings in the
trial court, and if the party agrees to the corrections, have the corrections made,
sign the bill, and file it with the trial court clerk; or
(C) if the complaining party will not agree to the corrections suggested by
the judge, return the bill to the complaining party with the judge’s refusal written
on it, and prepare, sign, and file with the trial court clerk such bill as will, in the
judge’s opinion, accurately reflect the proceeding in the trial court.
(3) If the complaining party is dissatisfied with the bill of exception filed
by the judge under (2)(C), the party may file with the trial court clerk the bill that
was rejected by the judge. That party must also file the affidavits of at least three
people who observed the matter to which the bill of exception is addressed. The
affidavits must attest to the correctness of the bill as presented by the party. The
matters contained in that bill of exception may be controverted and maintained by
-2-
 additional affidavits filed by any party within ten days after the filing of that bill.
The truth of the bill of exception will be determined by the appellate court.
(d) Conflict. If a formal bill of exception conflicts with the reporter’s
record, the bill controls.
(e) Time to file.
(1) Civil cases. In a civil case, a formal bill of exception must be filed no
later than 30 days after the filing party’s notice of appeal is filed.
(2) Criminal cases. In a criminal case, a formal bill of exception must be
filed:
(A) no later than 60 days after the trial court pronounces or suspends
sentence in open court; or
(B) if a motion for new trial has been timely filed, no later than 90 days
after the trial court pronounces or suspends sentence in open court.
(3) Extension of time. The appellate court may extend the time to file a
formal bill of exception if, within 15 days after the deadline for filing the bill, the
party filed in the appellate court a motion complying with Rule 10.5(b).
(f) Inclusion in clerk’s record. When filed a formal bill of exception
should be included in the appellate record.

The second rule governing error preservation is Texas Rule of Evidence 103 which reads as

follows:

TRE 103. RULINGS ON EVIDENCE

(a) Effect of Erroneous Ruling. Error may not be predicated upon a
ruling which admits or excludes evidence unless a substantial right of the party is
affected, and
(1) Objection. In case the ruling is one admitting evidence, a timely
objection or motion to strike appears of record, stating the specific ground of
objection, if the specific ground was not apparent from the context. When the
court hears objections to offered evidence out of the presence of the jury and rules
that such evidence be admitted, such objections shall be deemed to apply to such
evidence when it is admitted before the jury without the necessity of repeating
those objections.
(2) Offer of proof. In case the ruling is one excluding evidence, the
substance of the evidence was made known to the court by offer, or was apparent
from the context within which questions were asked.
(b) Record of Offer and Ruling. The offering party shall, as soon as
practicable, but before the court’s charge is read to the jury, be allowed to make,
in the absence of the jury, its offer of proof. The court may add any other or
further statement which shows the character of the evidence, the form in which it
was offered, the objection made, and the ruling thereon. The court may, or at the
request of a party shall, direct the making of an offer in question and answer form.
(c) Hearing of Jury. In jury cases, proceedings shall be conducted, to
the extent practicable, so as to prevent inadmissible evidence from being
suggested to the jury by any means, such as making statements or offers of proof
or asking questions in the hearing of the jury.
(d) Fundamental Error in Criminal Cases. In a criminal case, nothing
-3-
 in these rules precludes taking notice of fundamental errors affecting substantial
rights although they were not brought to the attention of the court.

Both rules must be read in tandem and against the backdrop of all of the Rules of Appellate

Procedure and Rules of Evidence.

The first thing that should be obvious from reading Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 33

and Texas Rule of Evidence 103 is that in order to complain about something on appeal the

complaint must first have been made to the trial court. The most common way to bring

something to the attention of a trial court is by objection. Saying the word “objection,” however,

is not enough. The objection must be

Timely; and

Specific.

An objection is timely if made at the earliest opportunity. This generally means that if a

question calls for inadmissible evidence the objection must be made before the answer is given.

If the question is proper but the answer is not, the objection must be made when the answer is

given.

An objection should be specific enough to put the judge on notice of the grounds for the

objection so the judge will know why the objection should be sustained. Specificity is also

important in order to map out the point of error on appeal should the judge overrule the

objection. This means you must state all the grounds for the objection in order to maintain

maximum flexibility on appeal. If one ground for the objection is stated in the trial court and

another ground is raised on appeal, the appellate court will not consider the point of error

because the ground was not presented to the trial court.

There is an exception to the rule that you should state all of the grounds for your

objection as specifically as possible. If you object but wait a few seconds before stating your

-4-
grounds, the judge may immediately sustain the objection. Unless your opponent complains and

asks the judge for the basis of the ruling, you will benefit from the proposition of law that a

judge’s ruling will be upheld if there is any proper basis for the ruling. Conversely, if you state a

specific ground for the objection, but it is not a proper one, the trial judge may overrule the

objection with impunity.

Once you have made your timely and specific objection, you should not sit down in smug

satisfaction admiring your brilliance. You must

Get a ruling.

Absent a ruling, all you have is a forfeiture of your objection. There is nothing preserved for

appeal. Don’t let the judge say: “The jury will remember the testimony;” or “Move on please;”

or some other non-ruling. Ask the judge to rule on the objection and if he does not, object to the

failure of the judge to rule. This preserves your error for purposes of appeal.

If your objection is sustained, you must carry on until you get an adverse ruling if you

want to preserve the objection for appeal. This is where the familiar litany of objection,

instruction to disregard, and motion for mistrial comes into play. For appellate purposes, this

litany should be followed in the order stated. Appellate courts usually do not approve of

skipping the first two steps and immediately requesting a mistrial.

If your specific, timely objection is overruled, do not assume you have done your job as

far as protecting the record for appeal. It is critical that you

Keep objecting.

If you allow the same evidence to which you earlier objected to come in without

objection, you will have forfeited your right to raise the overruling of the earlier objection on

appeal. This means that if your opponent is going to ask a number of questions about an

objectionable subject you must object to each question unless the judge allows you a continuing

-5-
objection to all of the objectionable questions. You should be careful, however, that the record

reflects exactly what subject matter is covered by the continuing objection and the grounds for

the continuing objection. If the witness strays ever so slightly into a different but still

objectionable subject matter, a new objection should be made. Similarly, if a new witness takes

the stand to testify about the same subject matter, it would be wise to renew the objection. An

alternative to the continuing objection is to make objections in a hearing outside the presence of

the jury. This will preserve your error without the need of objecting again in the presence of the

jury. But remember, do not say “no objection” when the evidence is offered in the presence of

the jury or you will waive your objection.

The keep objecting rule applies to sustained objections the same as it does to overruled

objections, particularly if the objectionable evidence is something you really want to keep fro the

jury. Thus, do not become complacent and assume that your opponent will never stray into

objectionable territory again because the judge sustained your objection the first time your

opponent tried this tack. A good trial lawyer will always come back at you from a different

direction. You must therefore be alert and object each time your opponent returns to the

objectionable subject.

You may have the misfortune of being in a trial from time to time with an opponent who

knows how to make timely, specific objections and get rulings on those objections. Your

opponent may even be so good as to get his objections sustained. If the sustained objection

prevents you from presenting certain testimony or evidence to the jury, then you must

Make an offer of proof.

An offer of proof serves two purposes. One is to try to persuade the trial judge to change

his mind and permit the evidence to be introduced. The other is to make a record for the

appellate court so they will know the nature of the excluded evidence.
-6-
 An offer of proof may be made in either narrative form or question and answer form, at

your discretion. It should be remembered that in whatever form the offer of proof takes the

proffered evidence must be admissible under the rules of evidence.

An offer of proof is not the same thing as a Bill of Exceptions. Thus, when the judge

excludes evidence you want to present to the jury, do not ask the judge if you can make a “bill.”

Ask if you can make an offer of proof. The judge may be so impressed with your proper use of

legal terminology that he may change his mind and allow the evidence to be presented to the

jury.

A Bill of Exceptions has importance only in making a record for appellate purposes. It is

done after a trial is concluded in order to make the record reflect something that was not taken

down by the court reporter. This may be something that occurred outside the presence of the

court reporter or may be something, such as a bench conference that the court reporter did not

take down. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 33 is very specific on how to prepare a Bill of

Exceptions.

The use of Bills of Exceptions is a rare practice that could be made even rarer if lawyers

would make certain that court reporters are recording all proceedings. A lawyer should

Never waive a court reporter

for any portion of the trial. The court reporter should take voir dire, should take bench

conferences, should take everything. Do not rely on the fact that Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 13.1 requires court reporters to record all proceedings. Many don’t. When you go to

the bench for a conference, take the court reporter with you. When you are giving a final

argument, make sure the reporter’s fingers are moving. Do not let the trial judge intimidate you

into waiving a court reporter for some portion of the trial. Just the fact that the court reporter is

there keeps your opponent and the judge honest. More importantly, there is no record without

-7-
the court reporter. Absent a record, there is no error on appeal.

-8-