FESS
FESS
F.E.S.S.
“UNCAPPING THE EGG”
The Endoscopic Approach to Frontal Recess and Sinuses
Heinz STAMMBERGER
®
F.E.S.S.
“UNCAPPING THE EGG”
The Endoscopic Approach to
Frontal Recess and Sinuses
A Surgical Technique of the Graz University Medical School
by use of the KARL STORZ HOPKINS® 45° Telescopes
Contents
Introduction.................................................................................................... 7
Case 1 ............................................................................................................. 23
Case 2 ............................................................................................................. 25
Case 3 ............................................................................................................. 27
Case 4 ............................................................................................................. 29
Introduction
The endonasal approach to the frontal sinus undoubtedly requires sound
anatomical knowledge, highest surgical skills and dexterity. The frontal recess
is an anatomically very complex structure and can be seen as the ethmoidal
”pre-chamber” to the frontal sinus proper. Its configuration depends on a variety
of cells and lamellae with a high degree of individual variation. Almost always
disease in the frontal sinus results from underlying disease processes in the clefts
of the frontal recess. Rarely ever will inflammatory processes originate in the frontal
sinus cavity itself. These findings consequently resulted in diagnosis, conservative
and surgical therapeutic measures to focus on these ”pre-chambers” to the frontal
sinus. Especially in surgery, the delicate bony structures and the mucosa in the Fig. 1
frontal recess region require a very careful, minimally traumatic approach: Overly Original drawing from Halle’s publication
forceful handling of instruments, traumatising the mucosa or its removal willrapidly from 1906: Drilling away the entire superior
nasal spine. Provided Halle already had had
lead to granulations, scar and stenosis formation. In these cases postoperative telescopes of different angulations, he most
healing will be significantly delayed, local postoperative care must be intensified likely would have chosen the more
and patients frequently be seen for follow-up. It is not a rare finding, that following physiologic approach dorso-laterally to the
traumatic manipulations in this region patients show frontal sinus problems which nasal spine (dotted line).
were not present before. These frontal sinus problems therefore must in part be
seen as iatrogenic.
Fig. 2 Fig. 3
Massive opacification of the frontal sinus …resulting from blockage of the frontal
bilaterally… recess.
FESS – “Uncapping the Egg” – The Endoscopic Approach to Frontal Recess and Sinuses
8
A Surgical Technique of the Graz University Medical School
Fig. 4
Mucus transport through frontal sinus and recess. There can be an active transport into the
frontal sinus from out of the frontal recess medially.
FESS – “Uncapping the Egg” – The Endoscopic Approach to Frontal Recess and Sinuses
9
A Surgical Technique of the Graz University Medical School
Fig. 5 Fig. 6
Sagittal CT demonstrating the basal Schematic drawing of narrowing of frontal
lamellae: recess by agger nasi-cells (blue), uncinate
1 = basal lamella of the uncinate process (red) and ethmoidal bulla and
2 = b. l. of the bulla other anterior ethmoidal cells (green),
3 = b. l. of the middle turbinate respectively.
4 = b. l. of the superior turbinate
Note the hourglass configuration of the
transition from frontal sinus to frontal
recess.
FESS – “Uncapping the Egg” – The Endoscopic Approach to Frontal Recess and Sinuses
10
A Surgical Technique of the Graz University Medical School
a b c a b c
Fig. 7 Fig. 8
Anatomical variations of the uncinate process. Narrowing of frontal recess by combinations of variants of uncinate,
bulla and agger nasi cells.
FESS – “Uncapping the Egg” – The Endoscopic Approach to Frontal Recess and Sinuses
11
A Surgical Technique of the Graz University Medical School
The ethmoidal bulla (or other cells of the anterior ethmoid, for instance so-called
infundibular cells) may expand into the frontal recess from posterior-inferiorly,
i.e. they pneumatise upward and forward and thus with their cranial “cap” of
bone may fill the frontal recess. This too, may lead to impairment/stenosis. Not
only may combinations of these three basic variants prevail, but cells may
develop into the frontal sinus (bulla frontalis, intrafrontal cells) presenting a true
challenge for diagnosis and even more, surgical therapy (Figs. 5–9).
Figs. 8 and 9 demonstrate some of the possibilities in a schematic fashion and in
CT: One can clearly see, that in all cases access to the frontal sinus is blocked by a
paper-thin cap of bone with its two mucosal layers.
It is of utmost importance to understand, that access to the frontal sinus ostium is
not blocked by the allegedly important “nasal beak”. This massive bony structure is
only of relevance in patients with extremely narrow dorsum of the nose. Even then,
access to the frontal sinus is only impeded medially, next to the nasal septum.
Approaching from dorso-laterally, the internal nasal spine very rarely presents an Fig. 10 a
obstacle or a pathophysiologically relevant structure.
Very clearly this situation can be recognised in Fig. 1 taken from Halle’s publication
from 1906: It must be assumed that Halle would not have chosen this approach,
if at that time endoscopes for “looking around the corner” had been available
to him. The removal of the very thin bony septations posterolateral to the “nasal
beak” would have resulted in a wide and natural passage, via a far less traumatic
approach, avoiding unwarranted removal of bone and mucosa.
Fig. 10 b
Figs. 10 a + b: Schematic drawing of
frontal recess narrowed by agger nasi and
infundibular cells (a), as well as by a
terminal recess and infundibular cells (b).
Fig. 9a Fig. 9 b
Figs. 9a + b: Several cells may be superimposed and narrow the frontal recess, sometimes even reach into the sinus lumen itself as
“intrafrontal cells”.
FESS – “Uncapping the Egg” – The Endoscopic Approach to Frontal Recess and Sinuses
12
A Surgical Technique of the Graz University Medical School
If uncinate, bulla and agger nasi cells were resected during endonasal surgery
and the frontal sinus ostium is not visible, this almost always can be traced
back to a typical anatomical situation: A thin curved bony “shell” has remained,
which may be in contact with the skull base or the lateral lamella of the middle
turbinate. This thin bone layer blocks access to the frontal sinus proper, towards its
ostium. The technical challenge is to identify and carefully remove this cap of bone.
In the vast majority of cases this manoeuvre will expose the level of the frontal sinus
ostium. Rarely there is need then to enlarge the latter let alone to drill away the
“nasal beak”.
For these manipulations simple but delicate instruments are required (Figs.
12, 13). With specially curved curettes (according to F. Kuhn) or Giraffe forceps
these structures can be removed. All these manoeuvres must be performed
under good direct vision and optimal hemostasis. Only in this way true
atraumatic surgery is possible. The new KARL STORZ 45° endoscopes were
especially developed for this purpose. They offer a crucial “extra”of retrograde
upward viewing allowing for a complete inspection of the frontal recess.
Fig. 12 Fig. 13
Removal of an “cap of the egg” with giraffe Remnants of an “egg cap” are identified and
forceps. carefully removed.
In the past it was not always possible to achieve this with the well proven 30°
telescopes. On the other hand the 45° telescopes are constructed in a way
that they still allow for a straight forward view. This is important when inserting
the instruments, as at 6.00 o’clock of the visual field the view is almost parallel
to the longitudinal axis of the endoscope. This is an advantage over the
well proven 70° endoscopes, which do not offer any optical information in the
direction of the shaft itself.
One of our favourite instruments for surgery in the frontal recess, especially
when removing thin bone caps, is the upbent circular cutting punch (Fig.14).
With this instrument one can well avoid to expose bare bone which in turn will
help to avoid scaring and restenosis. If performed well, this approach leaves
behind a wide frontal recess and an open frontal sinus ostium. All walls are
covered by mucosa with only minimal areas of bone exposed at the cutting edges
of the very thin bony lamella. This considerably shortens the postoperative healing
phase.
Fig. 14 a Fig. 14 b
Schematic drawing demonstrating the use of the upcurved circular cutting punch.
FESS – “Uncapping the Egg” – The Endoscopic Approach to Frontal Recess and Sinuses
14
A Surgical Technique of the Graz University Medical School
Fig. 17
Fig. 17 Superimposing the “inverted” egg
Superimposing the “inverted” egg holder over the frontal sinus
holder over the frontal sinus infun- infundibulum and frontal recess, …
dibulum and frontal recess, …
Fig. 18
…the challenge is to remove the remaining “cap of the egg” from the frontal recess to reach the frontal sinus ostium and, finally,
the frontal sinus proper.
FESS – “Uncapping the Egg” – The Endoscopic Approach to Frontal Recess and Sinuses
15
A Surgical Technique of the Graz University Medical School
Fig. 19
Typical postoperative finding: On the left
side (of the patient) the bony cap of an
agger nasi-cell was not removed, resulting
in recurrent frontal sinusitis.
Fig. 20
As before, agger nasi-cells on both sides
were not removed sufficiently, resulting in
recurrent frontal sinus problems.
FESS – “Uncapping the Egg” – The Endoscopic Approach to Frontal Recess and Sinuses
16
A Surgical Technique of the Graz University Medical School
The main prerequisite for the success of this surgical approach is an atraumatic
technique.
Particular care must be taken to avoid any damage to the parietal mucosa, i.e.
ideally the walls of the frontal recess should be completely covered with mucosa
or at least the basal layers thereof. Areas of denuded bone must be reduced to
a minimum. In no case the frontal sinus ostium should be traumatised circularly,
let alone mucosa be removed in this region. Inevitably this will lead to scar and
stenosis formation. This problem is illustrated in Figs. 21–24. Fracturing of the
middle turbinate should be avoided by all means, to prevent lateralisation, scaring
and stenosis of the frontal recess. The mucosa at the insertion of the middle
turbinate should not be traumatised, especially no opposing raw surfaces be
created. If a middle turbinate has been destabilised accidentally, the technique
illustrated in Fig. 25 can be used to avoid lateralisation. Stents and drains are not
helpful if mucosa has been removed. The process of reepitheliasation and scarring
continues for many months!
Fig. 21
Schematic drawing of a seriously affected
frontal recess.
Postoperative Care
In patients who underwent frontal recess/sinus revisions, careful endoscopic
postoperative care is of utmost importance. Usually 8–12 days postoperatively
we start to aspirate wound secretions and instrumentally remove crust under
direct endoscopic vision, using 45° telescopes for these manipulations. No new
trauma should be produced during this procedure. The duration of follow-up
varies depending on the findings and the underlying disease. Usually this first
endoscopic control gives a good impression on whether or not a problem
case is at hands requiring frequent follow-ups at short intervals, or whether the
patient needs to be followed up at intervals of 4–5 weeks only. Depending on
initial underlying pathology, normalisation/stabilisation can be expected after
6 weeks to 6 months.
Fig. 25
If a middle turbinate insertion is fractured by accident, it can be stabilised as follows:
Small areas of opposing mucosal surfaces are scarified, inducing circumscribed adhesions.
These scars can – but do not have to – be separated again several weeks later
(following W. Bolger).
FESS – “Uncapping the Egg” – The Endoscopic Approach to Frontal Recess and Sinuses
18
A Surgical Technique of the Graz University Medical School
Fig. 27
The two KARL STORZ HOPKINS® 45° telescopes.
FESS – “Uncapping the Egg” – The Endoscopic Approach to Frontal Recess and Sinuses
19
A Surgical Technique of the Graz University Medical School
For the same reason upbiting Blakesley forceps have been designed with a
horizontal handle (Fig. 28). This results in a better angulation during the initial work
in the frontal recess.
The delicate “giraffe” forceps are used to remove the delicate bony lamellae
(“cap of the egg”) from the frontal recess: Frontally oriented segments are
grasped with the forward-backward opening forceps, longitudinally oriented bone
segments with the laterally (left-right) opening one. If there is need to remove
thicker bony segments, through-cutting forceps (Figs. 29) are used. Of all the
instruments mentioned, we only use the smaller size (size 1) to avoid trauma to the
mucosa by trying to insert large instrument tips.
Several years ago we developed the circular cutting punch to resect horizontally
oriented thin bony lamellae if required. If we have to enlarge the frontal sinus
ostium proper, we almost exlusively do this with circular cutting forceps.
The advantage is evident: Cutting and thus removal of bone is possible in all
directions (360°), without any need to rotate the shaft or handle of the instrument. Fig. 29 a
Interference with the endoscope thus is minimised. “Giraffe Neck” Forceps.
Fig. 29 b
Through-cutting BLAKESLEY Nasal
Forceps.
Fig. 28 Fig. 30
45° upturned BLAKESLEY-STAMMBERGER Nasal Forceps with handle in right horizontal Detail of upturned Circular Cutting
position. Punches.
FESS – “Uncapping the Egg” – The Endoscopic Approach to Frontal Recess and Sinuses
20
A Surgical Technique of the Graz University Medical School
Fig. 12
FESS – “Uncapping the Egg” – The Endoscopic Approach to Frontal Recess and Sinuses
22
A Surgical Technique of the Graz University Medical School
Fig. 1
Case 1
Fig. 1: Typical intraoperative situation: Only the surgeon and the scrub nurse
are required for endonasal endoscopic procedures (including tumors and other
operations at the anterior skull base). No assistant is necessary. The surgeon can
control the position of his endoscopic picture via the smaller monitor, the larger
monitor providing information for the scrub nurse, the anesthetists and residents/
registrars and/or visitors.
Fig. 2: Intraoperative situation on the left side: The 45° telescope has been
introduced into the middle meatus lateral to the middle turbinate. View is up
into the frontal recess. The uncinate process and bulla have been resected. The
patient is suffering from massive chronic rhinosinusitis with polyposis (type IV). The
frontal sinus ostium cannot be visualised yet. Looking for the “cap of the egg”, a
curved curette is introduced and the medial free margin of the bony cap carefully
palpated. After identification, the thin bony shell is carefully elevated off the middle
turbinate (Figs. 3, 4). Clearly one can see now that all which needs to be removed
is an eggshell thin bone cap with its bilateral mucosal layer, indeed. This “cap of
the egg” is carefully pushed laterally now (Fig. 5) and removed with a thin giraffe
forceps. This results in a first free view of the frontal sinus ostium (Fig. 6), and after
aspiration of retained mucus a more or less normal mucosa inside the frontal sinus
can be visualised.
FESS – “Uncapping the Egg” – The Endoscopic Approach to Frontal Recess and Sinuses
24
A Surgical Technique of the Graz University Medical School
Case 2
Right side of a patient: The 45° telescope has been introduced under the
middle turbinate into the middle meatus behind the suspected “cap of the egg”,
blocking access to the frontal sinus ostium. The posterior portion of this bone
cap has been identified and is gently elevated towards anteriorly (Fig. 2). This
results in identification of the frontal sinus ostium proper. The latter now is
enlarged with the upturned circular cutting forceps (Fig. 3), removing further
fragments of the “eggshell” of this high reaching agger nasi cell. In Fig. 4 the
precision can be seen resulting from the use of the upcurved circular cutting
punch. Now view into the frontal sinus proper is possible (Fig. 5). Some minor
bony edges are carefully removed out of the frontal recess (Fig. 6), leaving the
parietal mucosa to cover all of the bony walls. No packing is used in this region
nor are stents applied. Fig. 7 demonstrates the situation encountered at the first
endoscopic control 10 days postoperatively, after removal of minor crusts and
aspiration of wound secretions. lt is time and again surprising to see the rapid
recovery and healing following these atraumatic approaches to the frontal sinus.
We believe, that preservation of the parietal mucosa and the avoidance of bone
exposure contribute significantly to this phenomenon.
Fig. 7
FESS – “Uncapping the Egg” – The Endoscopic Approach to Frontal Recess and Sinuses
26
A Surgical Technique of the Graz University Medical School
Case 3
View into the frontal recess, left side, with the 45° endoscope. Clearly one can
see the somewhat oblique course of the anterior ethmoidal artery, suspended
in an approximately 5 mm long bony mesentery from the skull base. Anterior to
the artery a small supraorbital cell can be identified. Anterior to that, a delicate
bony “cap” blocks view and access to the frontal sinus. In Fig. 2, a curved
spoon is carefully introduced between the supraorbital cell and the “bone cap”
and the thin bony intersection removed. This does not yet open access to the
frontal sinus, but one can recognise the small bony edge of the “cap of the egg”
(Fig. 3). Further approach is between the latter and the middle turbinate, and the
bony wall of this (agger nasi) cell is carefully pushed laterally, thus identifying
the way to the frontal sinus ostium proper (Fig. 4). In Fig. 5 one can see how
prior to removal of the “egg cap” a malleable suction tube is introduced into the
frontal sinus and the retained mucus is aspirated. Now the lumen of the frontal
sinus can clearly be identified (Fig. 6). Thin remnants of the “egg cap” which had
reached significantly into the lumen of the frontal sinus, are removed with a
curved circular cutting punch (Fig. 7). This results in a free and well epithelialised
passage between frontal sinus and recess (Fig. 8).
Fig. 7 Fig. 8
FESS – “Uncapping the Egg” – The Endoscopic Approach to Frontal Recess and Sinuses
28
A Surgical Technique of the Graz University Medical School
Case 4
Same patient, right side: The anterior ethmoid has been cleared already, the
middle turbinate is in situ and unharmed (Fig.1). When a 45° telescope is
inserted lateral to the middle turbinate, view is possible into the frontal recess
(Fig. 2) and onto the anterior skull base. The frontal sinus ostium itself cannot
be identified however. At 12.00 o’clock clearly the dome-like roof of an anterior
ethmoidal cell can be recognised, apparently reaching into the frontal sinus
proper (Figs. 2 and 3). With a malleable suction tube the posterior circumference
of this cell cap is further delineated (Figs. 4 and 5). In Fig. 6 the curved curette
points towards the cell cap which needs to be removed. Clearly, the posterior and
medial margin of the latter can be identified. The cell cap together with its mucosa
is carefully removed progressing from the back to the front (Figs. 7 and 8), and the
frontal sinus ostium proper can now clearly be identified (Figs. 9 and 10). Remnants
of the “cap of the egg” are carefully removed with the upcurved circular cutting
punch (Fig. 11), resulting in a wide access to the frontal sinus proper (Fig.12). Fig. 10
It should be noted that the total opacification of this frontal sinus in the CT-scans
was due to the retained mucus only, whereas the mucosa itself does not present
with significant pathology. Findings like these further support our use of this
surgical technique with its relative atraumatic approach.
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
FESS – “Uncapping the Egg” – The Endoscopic Approach to Frontal Recess and Sinuses
30
A Surgical Technique of the Graz University Medical School
Conclusion
The endoscopic techniques illustrated in this brochure have been used by us since
many years. With these, we have managed to avoid radical endonasal surgery
(as well as routine external procedures) by and large. With an average of 400 – 600
patients operated on per year at our department we had to use drill-out techniques
in less than 2 per cent. This figure has remained constant over many years and
includes revision cases as well. With this, we do not want to dispute the value of
“drill-out” procedures. We strongly feel however, that they are required for special,
well selected indications only. In the majority of cases one can (re-)establish the
natural ventilation and drainage with significantly less radical approaches, following
the anatomical “pathways”.
If surgery is performed using the microscope or 0° endoscopes only however,
“view around the corner” and exposure of the frontal sinus ostium in many cases
is not possible at all: Then, the “nasal beak” has to be drilled away – the natural
anatomical access simply is not a straight one!
We feel that the KARL STORZ 45° telescopes are a significant development to
further improve and enhance our possibilities of less traumatic, functional surgery
of frontal sinus diseases, following the natural anatomical routes.
FESS – “Uncapping the Egg” – The Endoscopic Approach to Frontal Recess and Sinuses
31
A Surgical Technique of the Graz University Medical School
7230 FA/7229 FA
7230 FLA
It is recommended to check the suitability of the product for the intended procedure prior to use.
FESS – “Uncapping the Egg” – The Endoscopic Approach to Frontal Recess and Sinuses
33
A Surgical Technique of the Graz University Medical School
Accessories
for use with HOPKINS® Telescopes
39501 A2
FESS – “Uncapping the Egg” – The Endoscopic Approach to Frontal Recess and Sinuses
34
A Surgical Technique of the Graz University Medical School
628712 length 19 cm
628001
628714 KUHN-BOLGER Frontal Sinus Curette,
90° curved, oval, forward cutting,
length 19 cm
586125 v. EICKEN Antrum Cannula,
LUER-Lock, long curved, malleable,
/1
1
serrated grip plate, outer diameter 2.5 mm,
628714 length 12.5 cm
586130 v. EICKEN Antrum Cannula,
LUER-Lock, long curved, malleable,
serrated grip plate, outer diameter 3.0 mm,
length 12.5 cm
651055/651060 651060
651055
651050/651065 651065
651050 STAMMBERGER Punch, circular cutting, 651060 STAMMBERGER Punch, circular cutting,
for sphenoid, ethmoid and choanal atresia, 65° upturned, for frontal sinus recess,
diameter 4.5 mm, with cleaning connector, diameter 3.5 mm, with cleaning connector,
working length 18 cm working length 17 cm
651055 Same, diameter 3.5 mm 651065 Same, diameter 4.5 mm
FESS – “Uncapping the Egg” – The Endoscopic Approach to Frontal Recess and Sinuses
35
A Surgical Technique of the Graz University Medical School
651057
651050 R
Indications/Applications:
## Arterial bleeding (ethmoidal, sphenopalatine and ## Rendu-Osler-Weber disease
maxillary arteries, turbinate and septum vessels) ## Secondary hemorrhage, e.g., from the
## Skull base surgery nasopharynx following adenotomy
## Oozing hemorrhage from the mucosa edges ## Edema prevention, shrinkage of mucosa
## Pituitary gland surgery (for example, posterior end of the turbinate)
## Vascular processes, i.e. nasopharyngeal fibroma ## Turbinate cauterization
## Epistaxis
461010
461015
Innovative Design
## Dashboard: Complete overview with intuitive ## Automatic light source control
menu guidance ## Side-by-side view: Parallel display of standard
## Live menu: User-friendly and customizable image and the Visualization mode
## Intelligent icons: Graphic representation changes ## Multiple source control: IMAGE1 S a llows
when settings of connected devices or the entire the simultaneous display, processing and
system are adjusted documentation of image information from
two c onnected image sources, e.g., for hybrid
operations
TC 200EN
Specifications:
HD video outputs - 2x DVI-D Power supply 100 – 120 VAC/200 – 240 VAC
- 1x 3G-SDI Power frequency 50/60 Hz
Format signal outputs 1920 x 1080p, 50/60 Hz Protection class I, CF-Defib
LINK video inputs 3x Dimensions w x h x d 305 x 54 x 320 mm
USB interface 4x USB, (2x front, 2x rear) Weight 2.1 kg
SCB interface 2x 6-pin mini-DIN
TC 300
Specifications:
Camera System TC 300 (H3-Link)
Supported camera heads/video endoscopes TH 100, TH 101, TH 102, TH 103, TH 104, TH 106
(fully compatible with IMAGE1 S)
22 2200 55-3, 22 2200 56-3, 22 2200 53-3, 22 2200 60-3, 22 2200 61-3,
22 2200 54-3, 22 2200 85-3
(compatible without IMAGE1 S technologies CLARA, CHROMA, SPECTRA*)
LINK video outputs 1x
Power supply 100 – 120 VAC/200 – 240 VAC
Power frequency 50/60 Hz
Protection class I, CF-Defib
Dimensions w x h x d 305 x 54 x 320 mm
Weight 1.86 kg
Specifications:
IMAGE1 FULL HD Camera Heads IMAGE1 S H3-Z
Product no. TH 100
Image sensor 3x 1/3" CCD chip
Dimensions w x h x d 39 x 49 x 114 mm
Weight 270 g
Optical interface integrated Parfocal Zoom Lens,
f = 15 – 31 mm (2x)
Min. sensitivity F 1.4/1.17 Lux
Grip mechanism standard eyepiece adaptor
Cable non-detachable
Cable length 300 cm
Specifications:
IMAGE1 FULL HD Camera Heads IMAGE1 S H3-ZA
Product no. TH 104
Image sensor 3x 1/3" CCD chip
Dimensions w x h x d 39 x 49 x 100 mm
Weight 299 g
Optical interface integrated Parfocal Zoom Lens,
f = 15 – 31 mm (2x)
Min. sensitivity F 1.4/1.17 Lux
Grip mechanism standard eyepiece adaptor
Cable non-detachable
Cable length 300 cm
FESS – “Uncapping the Egg” – The Endoscopic Approach to Frontal Recess and Sinuses
43
A Surgical Technique of the Graz University Medical School
Monitors
9619 NB 19" HD Monitor,
color systems PAL/NTSC, max. screen
resolution 1280 x 1024, image format 4:3,
power supply 100 – 240 VAC, 50/60 Hz,
wall-mounted with VESA 100 adaption,
including:
External 24 VDC Power Supply
Mains Cord
9619 NB
9826 NB
FESS – “Uncapping the Egg” – The Endoscopic Approach to Frontal Recess and Sinuses
44
A Surgical Technique of the Graz University Medical School
Monitors
Optional accessories:
9826 SF Pedestal, for monitor 9826 NB
9626 SF Pedestal, for monitor 9619 NB
Specifications:
KARL STORZ HD and FULL HD Monitors 19" 26"
Desktop with pedestal optional optional
Product no. 9619 NB 9826 NB
Brightness 200 cd/m2 (typ) 500 cd/m2 (typ)
Max. viewing angle 178° vertical 178° vertical
Pixel distance 0.29 mm 0.3 mm
Reaction time 5 ms 8 ms
Contrast ratio 700:1 1400:1
Mount 100 mm VESA 100 mm VESA
Weight 7.6 kg 7.7 kg
Rated power 28 W 72 W
Operating conditions 0 – 40°C 5 – 35°C
Storage -20 – 60°C -20 – 60°C
Rel. humidity max. 85% max. 85%
Dimensions w x h x d 469.5 x 416 x 75.5 mm 643 x 396 x 87 mm
Power supply 100 – 240 VAC 100 – 240 VAC
Certified to EN 60601-1, EN 60601-1, UL 60601-1,
protection class IPX0 MDD93/42/EEC,
protection class IPX2
FESS – “Uncapping the Egg” – The Endoscopic Approach to Frontal Recess and Sinuses
45
A Surgical Technique of the Graz University Medical School
Workflow-oriented use
Patient
Entering patient data has never been this easy. AIDA seamlessly
integrates into the existing infrastructure such as HIS and PACS.
Data can be entered manually or via a DICOM worklist.
ll important patient information is just a click away.
Checklist
Central administration and documentation of time-out. The checklist
simplifies the documentation of all critical steps in accordance with
clinical standards. All checklists can be adapted to individual needs
for sustainably increasing patient safety.
Record
High-quality documentation, with still images and videos being
recorded in FULL HD and 3D. The Dual Capture function allows for
the parallel (synchronous or independent) recording of two sources.
All recorded media can be marked for further processing with just
one click.
Edit
With the Edit module, simple adjustments to recorded still images
and videos can be very rapidly completed. Recordings can be quickly
optimized and then directly placed in the report.
In addition, freeze frames can be cut out of videos and edited and
saved. Existing markings from the Record module can be used for
quick selection.
Complete
Completing a procedure has never been easier. AIDA offers a large
selection of storage locations. The data exported to each storage
location can be defined. The Intelligent Export Manager (IEM) then
carries out the export in the background. To prevent data loss,
the system keeps the data until they have been successfully exported.
Reference
All important patient information is always available and easy to access.
Completed procedures including all information, still images, videos,
and the checklist report can be easily retrieved from the Reference module.
FESS – “Uncapping the Egg” – The Endoscopic Approach to Frontal Recess and Sinuses
48
A Surgical Technique of the Graz University Medical School
Equipment Cart
UG 540
FESS – “Uncapping the Egg” – The Endoscopic Approach to Frontal Recess and Sinuses
49
A Surgical Technique of the Graz University Medical School
UG 310
UG 410
UG 510
FESS – “Uncapping the Egg” – The Endoscopic Approach to Frontal Recess and Sinuses
50
A Surgical Technique of the Graz University Medical School
Notes:
with the compliments of
KARL STORZ — ENDOSKOPE