Progress Test 3
Progress Test 3
5
working in such close proximity, but there’s a huge amount of competitiveness among interpreters. They check
on each other and sometimes even count each other’s mistranslations.
Translating other people’s ideas prevented me from feeling involved and creative as an interpreter. Actually,
you can’t be a creative interpreter. It’s a contradiction in terms. Sometimes, when I disagreed with a speaker, I
wanted to rip off my headphones, jump up and run out of the booth, shouting: ‘Rubbish. Rubbish. You’re
talking a lot of nonsense, and this is what I think about it.’ Instead, I had to sit there and regurgitate opinions in
violent contradiction with my own. Sometimes, I’d get my revenge by playing games with the speaker’s tone
of voice. If he was being serious, I’d make him sound jocular. If he was being light-hearted, I’d make him sound
earnest.
Eventually, I wanted to find a career where my own words would matter and where my own voice would
be heard. So, to redress the balance, I decided to write a novel. While I was writing it, I did go back and interpret
at a few conferences to get inside the head of Dominique, my main character. At first, I was a little rusty
and a couple of the delegates turned round to glare at me, but after twenty minutes, I was back into it, playing
that old game of mental gymnastics. Interpreting is like learning to turn somersaults: you never forget how to do
it. But for me, sitting in the booth had a ghost-like quality to it – as though I had gone back into a past life - a life
that belonged to the time before I found my own voice.
1. In the first paragraph, the writer says she discovered that_______.
A. there were some subjects she had no interest in dealing with.
B. the standard of her work as an interpreter was getting lower.
C. her mind was wandering when she should have been doing her job.
D. she could no longer understand subjects she had previously covered.
2. What does the writer say about being an interpreter in the second paragraph ?
A. It was the kind of job her parents had always expected her to do.
B. It turned out to be more challenging than she had anticipated.
C. It was what she had wanted to be ever since she was a small child.
D. It gave her access to important information before other people.
3. What does the writer say about speakers she interpreted for ?
A. Some of them had a tendency to get irritated with interpreters.
B. She particularly disliked those she struggled to hear properly.
C. They usually had the wrong idea about the function of interpreters.
D. Some of them made little attempt to use their own language correctly.
4. The writer says that relationships between interpreters_______.
A. can make it difficult for interpreters to do their jobs well.
B. are affected by interpreters’ desires to prove how good they are.
C. usually start well but end in arguments.
D. are based on secret resentments.
5. The writer says that when she disagreed with speakers, she would sometimes_______.
A. mistranslate small parts of what they said.
B. make it clear from her tone of voice that she did not agree.
C. exaggerate their point of view.
D. give the impression that they did not really mean what they said.
6. The writer says that when she returned to interpreting, _______.
A. she did not start off very well.
B. she briefly wished she had not given it up.
C. she thought that two of the delegates recognized her.
D. she changed her ideas about the main character in her novel.
7. What is the writer’s main point in the article as a whole ?
A. It is not always a good idea to go into a profession because it looks glamorous.
B. Most interpreters eventually become disillusioned with the work.
C. Being an interpreter did not allow her to satisfy her need to be creative.
D. Most interpreters would actually like to do something more creative.
8. Which is the closest in meaning to momentous in ‘That momentous day’?
A. unimportant B. historic C. momentary D. hard
6
9. Which is the closest in meaning to ‘to glare’?
A. to glower B. to caress C. despise D. wonder
10. Which is the closest in meaning to ‘simultaneously’?
A. all again B. all at once C. once and for all D. once too often
Part 4. Read the following passage and do the tasks that follow. (20 pts)
THE PROBLEM OF SCARCE RESOURCES
Section A. The problem of how health-care resources should be allocated or apportioned, so that they are
distributed in both the most just and most efficient way, is not a new one. Every health system in an economically
developed society is faced with the need to decide (either formally or informally) what proportion of the
community’s total resources should be spent on health-care; how resources are to be apportioned; what diseases
and disabilities and which forms of treatment are to be given priority; which members of the community are to
be given special consideration in respect of their health needs; and which forms of treatment are the most cost-
effective.
Section B. What is new is that, from the 1950s onwards, there have been certain general changes in outlook about
the finitude of resources as a whole and of health-care resources in particular, as well as more specific changes
regarding the clientele of health-care resources and the cost to the community of those resources. Thus, in the
1950s and 1960s, there emerged an awareness in Western societies that resources for the provision of fossil fuel
energy were finite and exhaustible and that the capacity of nature or the environment to sustain economic
development and population was also finite. In other words, we became aware of the obvious fact that there were
‘limits to growth’. The new consciousness that there were also severe limits to health-care resources was part of
this general revelation of the obvious. Looking back, it now seems quite incredible that in the national health
systems that emerged in many countries in the years immediately after the 1939-45 World War, it was assumed
without question that all the basic health needs of any community could be satisfied, at least in principle; the
‘invisible hand’ of economic progress would provide.
Section C. However, at exactly the same time as this new realization of the finite character of health-care
resources was sinking in, an awareness of a contrary kind was developing in Western societies: that people have
a basic right to health-care as a necessary condition of a proper human life. Like education, political and legal
processes and institutions, public order, communication, transport and money supply, health-care came to be seen
as one of the fundamental social facilities necessary for people to exercise their other rights as autonomous human
beings. People are not in a position to exercise personal liberty and to be self-determining if they are poverty-
stricken, or deprived of basic education, or do not live within a context of law and order. In the same way, basic
health-care is a condition of the exercise of autonomy.
Section D. Although the language of ‘rights’ sometimes leads to confusion, by the late 1970s it was recognized
in most societies that people have a right to health-care (though there has been considerable resistance in the
United Sates to the idea that there is a formal right to health-care). It is also accepted that this right generates an
obligation or duty for the state to ensure that adequate health-care resources are provided out of the public purse.
The state has no obligation to provide a health-care system itself, but to ensure that such a system is provided. Put
another way, basic health-care is now recognized as a ‘public good’, rather than a ‘private good’ that one is
expected to buy for oneself. As the 1976 declaration of the World Health Organisation put it: ‘The enjoyment of
the highest attainable standard of health is one of the fundamental rights of every human being without distinction
of race, religion, political belief, economic or social condition’. As has just been remarked, in a liberal society
basic health is seen as one of the indispensable conditions for the exercise of personal autonomy.
Section E. Just at the time when it became obvious that health-care resources could not possibly meet the demands
being made upon them, people were demanding that their fundamental right to health-care be satisfied by the
state. The second set of more specific changes that have led to the present concern about the distribution of health-
care resources stems from the dramatic rise in health costs in most OECD countries, accompanied by large-scale
demographic and social changes which have meant, to take one example, that elderly people are now major (and
relatively very expensive) consumers of health-care resources. Thus in OECD countries as a whole, health costs
increased from 3.8% of GDP in 1960 to 7% of GDP in 1980, and it has been predicted that the proportion of
health costs to GDP will continue to increase. (In the US the current figure is about 12% of GDP, and in Australia
about 7.8% of GDP.)
As a consequence, during the 1980s a kind of doomsday scenario (analogous to similar doomsday extrapolations
about energy needs and fossil fuels or about population increases) was projected by health administrators,
7
economists and politicians. In this scenario, ever-rising health costs were matched against static or declining
resources.
Notes:
- OECD: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development
- GDP: Gross Domestic Products
Questions 1-5: (10pts)
Choose the correct heading for the five sections A-E of the Reading Passage from the list of headings below.
List of Headings
i The connection between health-care and other human rights
ii The development of market-based health systems.
iii The role of the state in health-care
iv A problem shared by every economically developed country
v The impact of recent change
vi The views of the medical establishment
vii The end of an illusion
viii Sustainable economic development
1. Section A: …………… 2. Section B: …………… 3. Section C: ……………
4. Section D: …………… 5. Section E: ……………
Questions 6-10: (10 pts)
Do the following statements agree with the view of the writer in the Reading Passage?
Write
YES if the statement agrees with the views of the writer
NO if the statement contradicts the views of the writer
NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this
6. ………… Personal liberty and independence have never been regarded as directly linked to health-care.
7. ………… Health-care came to be seen as a right at about the same time that the limits of health-care
resources became evident.
8. ………… In OECD countries population changes have had an impact on health-care costs in recent years.
9. ………… OECD governments have consistently underestimated the level of health-care provision needed.
10. ………… In most economically developed countries the elderly will to make special provision for their
health-care in the future.
Section 5. You are going to read four different opinions from leading scientists about the future of fuel. For
questions 1-10, choose from the writers A-D. The writers may be chosen more than once. (10 pts)
A. Howard Bloom, Author
Even though most people are convinced that peak oil has already passed, to me, peak oil is just a hypothesis.
There is a theory that carbon molecules can be found in interstellar gas clouds, comets and in space ice, and if
this is the case, our planet could ooze oil for ever. And even if we stay earthbound, those who say we have raped
the planet of all its resources are wrong. There's a huge stock of raw materials we haven't yet learned to use. There
are bacteria two miles beneath our feet which can turn solid granite into food. If bacteria can do it, surely we
creatures with brains can do it better. As far as the near future of energy is concerned, I believe the most promising
alternative fuels are biofuels, such as ethanol. It's an alcohol made from waste products such as the bark of trees,
woodchips, and other 'waste materials'. And that's not the only waste that can create energy. My friend in the
biomass industry is perfecting an energy-generation plant which can run on human waste. We produce that in
vast quantities, and it's already gathered in centralised locations.
B. Michael Lardelli, Lecturer in Genetics at The University of Adelaide
Nothing exists on this planet without energy. It enables flowers and people to grow and we need it to mine
minerals, extract oil or cut wood and then to process these into finished goods. So the most fundamental definition
of money is as a mechanism to allow the exchange and allocation of different forms of energy. Recently, people
have been using more energy than ever before. Until 2005 it was possible to expand our energy use to meet this
demand. However, since 2005 oil supply has been in decline, and at the same time, and as a direct result of this,
the world's economy has been unable to expand, leading to global recession. With the world's energy and the
profitability of energy production in decline at the same time, the net energy available to support activities other
than energy procurement will decrease. We could increase energy production by diverting a large proportion of
8
our remaining oil energy into building nuclear power stations and investing in renewable forms of energy.
However, this is very unlikely to happen in democratic nations, because it would require huge, voluntary
reductions in living standards. Consequently, the world economy will continue to contract as oil production
declines. With energy in decline, it will be impossible for everyone in the world to become wealthier. One person's
increased wealth can only come at the expense of another person's worsened poverty.
C. Jeroen van der Veer, chief executive of Royal Dutch Shell
People are understandably worried about a future of growing energy shortages, rising prices and international
conflict for supplies. These fears are not without foundation. With continued economic growth, the world's energy
needs could increase by 50% in the next 25 years. However, I do not believe that the world is running out of
energy. Fossil fuels will be able to meet growing demand for a long time in the future. Taking unconventional
resources into account, we are not even close to peak oil. The priority for oil companies is to improve efficiency,
by increasing the amount of oil recovered from reservoirs. At present, just over a third is recovered. We can also
improve the technology to control reservoir processes and improve oil flow. However, these projects are costly,
complex and technically demanding, and they depend on experienced people, so it is essential to encourage young
people to take up a technical career in the energy industry. Meanwhile, alternative forms of energy need to be
made economically viable. International energy companies have the capability, the experience and the
commercial drive to work towards solving the energy problem so they will play a key role. But it is not as simple
as merely making scientific advances and developing new tools; the challenge is to deliver the technology to
people worldwide. Companies will need to share knowledge and use their ideas effectively.
D. Craig Severance, blogger
What will it take to end our oil addiction? It's time we moved on to something else. Not only are world oil supplies
running out, but what oil is still left is proving very dirty to obtain. The Deepwater Horizon oil spill occurred
precisely because the easy-to-obtain oil is already tapped. If we don't kick oil now, we will see more disasters as
oil companies move to the Arctic offshore and clear more forests. The cheap petroleum is gone; from now on, we
will pay steadily more and more for our oil - not just in dollars, but in the biological systems that sustain life on
this planet. The only solution is to get on with what we will have to do anyway - end our dependence on it! There
are many instances in which oil need not be used at all. Heat and electricity can be produced in a multitude of
other ways, such as solar power or natural gas. The biggest challenge is the oil that is used in transportation. That
doesn't mean the transportation of goods worldwide, it's the day-to-day moving around of people. It means we
have to change what we drive. The good news is that it's possible. There are a wide range of fuel efficient cars on
offer, and the number of all-electric plug-in cars is set to increase. For long distance travel and freight, the solution
to this is to look to rail. An electrified railway would not be reliant upon oil, but could be powered by solar,
geothermal, hydro, and wind sources. There is a long way to go, but actions we take now to kick our oil addiction
can help us adapt to a world of shrinking oil supplies.
Which writer:
believes that from now on, less oil is available 1. …………..
believes there are ways to obtain energy that we have not yet discovered believes that 2. …………..
people need to be attracted to working in the energy industry 3. …………..
sees a great potential in natural fuels 4. …………..
believes that future oil recovery will lead to more environmental disasters believes the 5. …………..
fuel crisis will cause the poor to become poorer 6. …………..
believes that better technology can help to maintain oil production levels 7. …………..
believes there may be sources of oil outside our planet 8. …………..
thinks that oil companies are responsible for developing other types of energy 9. …………..
recognises that inventions that can help to prevent an energy crisis are already available 10. …………
10