I consider myself an artist and decided to connect my This issue is global, since it’s not connected

future to digital drawing professions. I also tried to use • Digital art-any artwork that • Copyright - in art,
draws upon digital making a public record geographically to one or few places speci cally,
image generators and have an idea about the process technology as an essential that the work belongs
of creating pictures using AI. This is the reason I’m but has international importance since AI is a
part of its creative process to the artist. virtual image and text generator that works via
interested in learning more about the AI debate and
taking the available perspectives into account. network. Digital artists that are directly related to
• Creativity-in art, a creation of • Plagiarism - in art, a
this topic, also come from di erent parts of the
an artistic image re ecting fraudulent
the real world surrounding a representation of world. I will address this research as global,
By investigating this topic I would like to shape my own person another person’s taking some local cases as the examples and
perspective on whether AI is actually posing a threat to drawing
the digital artists, or should they leave it the trivial work, support for the perspectives.
while focusing on their creative path.
• ML-a subset of AI that has
the ability to automatically • Intellectual property - a The whole research will be focused more on the
learn from the data without creative idea, invention,
explicitly being programmed creative work of future of this issue, using information from the
or assisted by domain authorship sources that are currently available. My research
expertise will also use both qualitative and quantitative
• Authorship - an attempt research methods, as I’ll both have to look at
Due to people testing and experimenting with AI creations since • Arti cial Intelligence-the to ground and statistics and analyze how and why people react
the 70's, and since the last year’s boom of AI popularity there is simulation of human contextualize the work
a bunch of articles, interviews, featuring both artists and AI
to the AI topic in a certain way, and how their
intelligence in machines that of art by assigning its
creators, essays and scienti c research papers. are programmed to think and performance to a background a ects their perspective. I'm going
Some sources insisting, that AI will overtake the creative eld act like humans. speci c individual. to use secondary data as my main source. There
and we should avoid it, while others claim it to be only a tool, are a number of websites, articles, essays and
there are also research papers that talk about both sides of the scienti c research available on my issue that I’m
argument where they evaluate the importance and evidence of planning to use in order to investigate this topic.
both sides therefore remaining neutral in their conclusion.

On one hand there are artists, claiming On the other hand, some people There are some users of AI that don’t Some people are not scared about AI
that AI is stealing the artworks and consider AI to be a non-creative art think the digital art is being stolen when invasion and take over, but rather
making up some digital hybrids without generator, that is not harming artists, and AI is using it for learning, since from concerned about the copyright issue
any sense or creativity. They also it should rather be perceived as a tool their perspective digital art is not a real that would appear around its rapid
mention that, because of AI being free, than avoided. They also claim AI will help art. Since digital art is made on development. They suggest making a
people prefer to copy the style of their with making ‘trivial artworks’ so there is computer and half of the actions are di erence by creating and adapting
favorite painter and make art there, only creative work remaining for artists to automatized, they believe it cannon be copyright laws for this situation.
rather than commission real artists, focus on. considered traditional art. Since it’s not
which harms them economically. Some 1. Source will be used to support the point that art, it can’t be copyrighted. Adding to 1. This source supports the perspective “We
computer made art is a tool and can’t be credited with that, due to digital artworks mainly should appreciate AI as an artist, but in the
artists state that certain people and
authorship in current understanding — Aaron future copyright laws should be manipulated
even big companies steal their posted on social media, it is easy to
Hertzmann, in his essay Can Computers Create Art? “— Dewan Grba Deep Else: A Critical
artworks and put them in an AI (2018) obtain it and use for personal purpose. Framework for AI Art (2021)
generator that slightly changes the 2. This paper includes information about interviews with 1. Forums on Reddit "Digital art is not as valid as traditional 2. Supporting the perspective is that certain
artwork, this way they can claim that artists on working with AI tools. — Jingyi Li, Sonia art", and on Quora "In my opinion, digital art is not true
rules towards AI to not endanger artists is
Hashim, Jennifer Jacobs What We Can Learn From art" that are used to displaying the score of people, taking
it’s their own. side against digital art; required — Ana Ramalho in Will Robots Rule
Visual Artists About Software Development (2021)
1. This will be used as a main source against AI. This source states that
3. Support to the perspective that AI is a tool, “no 2. This source provides that due to lack of a control the (Artistic) World? A Proposed Model for the
AI will learn to do artists work quicker and better — Nicholas Slate mechanism in online space, it’s hard to copyright digital
(2017) These Stunning A.I. Tools Are About to Change the Art World; machine is itself a source of creativity" — Ginsburg and Legal Status of Creations by Arti cial
artworks. -Ignace Nédée & Laurens Kasteleijn Legal
2. This website will be used as an evidence material, for artists taking Budiardjo, Authors and Machines(2019) considerations concerning digital artworks - challenges Intelligence Systems (2017)
action against AI — SUPPORT HUMAN ARTISTS by AI/ML media
advocacy;
4. This paper is talking about using AI to enhance and opportunities(2021); 3. Addressing the issue of copyright for artists
human’s creativity, using examples of artists who already 3. Addressing issue of copyright in cyberspace - Amy online - Leila Iruzun, Digital Art& Copyright: is
3. Source to support the perspective that AI can’t be called an artist —
do it — Harry H. Jiang etc. AI Art and its Impact on Bruckman, Cyberspace is Not Disneyland: the Role of the
S. Will Chambers AI Agents are not Artists. AI Lacks the Innate Psychic
Artist in a Networked World our work really protected?
Structure and Experience to Create Art. Artists (2023)
ff
fi
fi
fi
ff
fl
fi
fi
ff
fi
fi