Fire Safety Journal: W.Z. Zheng, X.M. Hou, D.S. Shi, M.X. Xu
Fire Safety Journal: W.Z. Zheng, X.M. Hou, D.S. Shi, M.X. Xu
a r t i c l e in fo abstract
Article history: Experiments on the fire resistance of 15 prestressed concrete (PC) simply-supported slabs and 9 two-span
Received 24 October 2008 unbonded PC continuous slabs were conducted. Preliminary conclusions drawn are that concrete spalls
Received in revised form more easily or more seriously when the compressive stress is higher or the tensile stress is lower on the
20 May 2010
surface exposed to fire, and when the strength and water content of concrete at ambient temperature are
Accepted 3 June 2010
Available online 20 June 2010
higher. Based on the test results, an expression for the top envelope surface of the concrete spalling is
presented by taking the average standard concrete cube strength at ambient temperature as the x-axis,
Keywords: the concrete water content at ambient temperature as the y-axis, and the normal stress level of concrete
Fire extreme fiber in the pre-compression zone of a slab at elevated temperature as the z-axis. To facilitate
Spalling
design and application, an expression for the top envelope surface of the concrete spalling is presented by
Prestressed slabs
keeping the x-axis and the y-axis the same, and the normal stress level of concrete extreme fiber in the
Stress
Concrete pre-compression zone of a slab at ambient temperature as the z-axis.
Water content & 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
n
Corresponding author.
The concrete mixture ratio by weight is as follows: cement:
E-mail addresses: [email protected] (W.Z. Zheng), sand:coarse aggregate:water ¼1:1.41:2.74:0.42. Ordinary Port-
[email protected] (X.M. Hou). land cement (OPC) of Strength Class 42.5 MPa is used throughout
0379-7112/$ - see front matter & 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2010.06.001
284 W.Z. Zheng et al. / Fire Safety Journal 45 (2010) 283–297
the investigation. The coarse aggregate is calcium carbonate and The dimensions of the furnace chamber are 3 4 m2. Standard
the fine aggregate is silica. The main chemical composition of weights were used to apply the loads on the test slabs. First, the
coarse aggregate is calcium carbonate. Coarse aggregate of design loads were imposed on the slabs to be tested. Heat was
maximal size 20 mm is used. The density of the concrete is generated in the test furnace in accordance with the ISO834
2400 kg/m3. The prestressing steel tendons are low relaxation jP5 standard heating curve [18] by burning oil. The furnace tempe-
steel wires with a fptk value of 1670 MPa and low relaxation ratures were measured by 8 thermocouples. The heating
jS15.24 steel strands with fptk value of 1860 MPa. The prestres- curve monitored by the thermocouples in the furnace is shown
sing steel strands jS15.24 are used in slab UPSA-S, and the in Fig. 4.
prestressing steel wires jP5 are used in the other slabs; the The temperature field was measured by thermocouples
details are listed in Table 1.The anchorage for the prestressing embedded on the surfaces of the bars and the concrete.
steel wires is a homemade button-head anchorage and that for The temperature on the unexposed surface was monitored
the prestressing strands is a single hole wedge-type anchorage. by the postpositional thermocouples. The deflections were
The stresses in prestressing steel wires by load cells installed measured at mid-span of each slab by a differential displacement
at the anchorage ends are shown in Fig. 1. transducer (LVDT) (range: 7150 mm) and the stresses in the
prestressing steel wires were measured by load cells installed
2.2. PC simply-supported slabs at the anchorage ends. The support reactions of the continuous
slabs when subjected to fire were measured by load cells at the
two side supports. These spans were not restrained against
The details of 15 PC simply-supported slabs for the experiments
thermal expansion. The whole intermediate support of the two-
are listed in Table 1. The specimens were cured outdoors, the
span PC continuous slabs was located within the furnace chamber
ambient temperature ranged from 2 to 18 1C, and the ages of the
and is also exposed to the fire which is similar to actual fire case.
specimens were 40–71 days. Variability of concrete strength and
The test furnace for testing continuous slabs after being
water content was found by testing the specimens before the
reconstructed with the intermediate supporting pier is shown in
spalling experiments. The layout of the non-prestressed steel bars
Fig. 5.
and prestressing steel wires in UPSS-1 is shown in Fig. 2. Slab PSS-1
Water and vapor escaping from the surfaces of the slabs,
is a pretensioned PC slab and the other slabs are unbonded PC slabs.
as well as through cracks and the nearby intermediate
support could be observed on the platforms at two sides of the
2.3. Two-span PC continuous slabs furnace. Concrete spalling at the bottom of the slabs was
monitored through observation holes at two sides of the furnace
The details of 9 two-span unbonded PC continuous slabs for [19–21].
the experiments are listed in Table 2. The profiles of prestressing A general picture of the simply-supported slabs installation
steel wires in slab UPCS-1 are shown in Fig. 3. is shown in Fig. 6. A steel beam can be seen to be firmly installed
over each of the test slabs. Some hangers are placed between
each of the slabs and the corresponding steel beam in order
3. Test scheme and spalling phenomena to prevent the slab dropping into the furnace on failure.
In addition, the steel beam was used to fix displacement
3.1. Test scheme transducers (LVDT). A general picture of the continuous slabs
installation is shown in Fig. 7. The experimental program of
The loaded slab tests under fire conditions were carried out in explosive spalling behaviour of PC members subjected to fire is
the test furnace at the Tianjin Fire Research Institute (Tianjin, China). shown in Fig. 8.
W.Z. Zheng et al. / Fire Safety Journal 45 (2010) 283–297 285
Table 1
Key parameters of simply-supported slabs.
Specimens c (mm) PPR spe (MPa) Z Ap As b h (mm) L/L0 (mm) mfcu (MPa) o (%) Ages of the
specimens (d)
UPSS-1 15 0.41 655 0.42 3jp5 2j6.5 + 3j8 600 80 3500/3300 56.9 3.98 55
UPSS-2 15 0.54 780 0.45 3jp5 3j8 600 80 3500/3300 48.2 3.50 51
UPSS-3 15 0.70 1013 0.52 5jp5 3j8 600 80 3500/3300 56.9 3.98 55
UPSS-4 25 0.42 806 0.54 3jp5 5j8 600 90 3500/3300 52.1 2.36 49
UPSS-5 25 0.56 988 0.34 3jp5 2j6.5 + 2j8 600 90 3500/3300 52.0 3.29 48
UPSS-6 25 0.68 651 0.44 5jp5 2j6.5 + 1j8 600 90 3500/3300 52.1 2.36 49
UPSS-7 30 0.42 1022 0.43 2jp5 3j6.5 + 2j8 600 95 3500/3300 52.0 3.29 48
UPSS-8 30 0.56 701 0.52 4jp5 2j6.5 + 2j8 600 95 3500/3300 47.3 3.49 46
UPSS-9 30 0.72 842 0.36 5jp5 2j6.5 + 1j8 600 95 3500/3300 22.8 1.83 44
PSS-1 25 0.55 900 0.35 3jp5 2j6.5 + 3j8 600 90 3500/3300 41.3 2.67 40
UPSA-1 15 0.40 678 Only the weight 3jp5 2j6.5 + 3j8 600 95 3500/3300 40.9 2.77 54
of the slab
UPSA-2 15 0.71 1036 5jp5 3j8 600 90 3500/3300 40.9 2.77 54
UPSA-3 30 0.40 989 2jp5 3j6.5 + 2j8 600 95 3500/3300 47.3 3.49 46
UPSA-4 30 0.68 674 6jp5 1j6.5 + 2j8 600 90 3500/3300 22.8 1.83 44
UPSA-S 15 0.70 900 js15 4j8 600 95 3500/3300 48.2 3.50 52
Note:
(1) Non-prestressed steel bars and prestressing steel wire of the critical section at mid-span of the slabs have the same concrete cover thickness. The concrete cover at the
critical section is represented by c.
(2) PPR ¼ Ap sp =ðAp sp þ As fy Þ (prestressing degree); sp is the predicted ultimate stress in unbonded prestressing steel wire at the limit state at ambient temperature;
sp ¼ spe + Dsp, where spe is the effective prestress at ambient temperature and Dsp is the stress increase in the unbonded prestressing steel wire beyond the effective
prestress, up to ultimate state at ambient temperature; fy is the average measured yield strength of the non-prestressed bar.
(3) Z (load level) is the ratio of the imposed load (including the weight of the slab) in the fire condition to the maximum load that the slab can carry at ambient
temperature.
(4) mfcu is the measured standard cube (150 150 150 mm3) strength of concrete. The concrete strengths were measured just prior to the spalling tests.
(5) The average measured tensile strength limit, proportional limit, and yield strength of jP5 prestressing steel wire are 1722, 1343, and 1498 MPa, and 1918, 1496, and
1668 MPa for jS15.24. The average measured yield strength and tensile strength limit of HPB235-j6.5 steel bars are 328 and 446 MPa, and 320 and 478 MPa for
HPB235-j8 bars.
(6) The profile of the wires in the unbonded PC slabs is a parabola. The wires stretch out straight from the centre line of the slab depth at the ends, and the distance
between the contra-flexure point and the centre line of the support is 15% of the span.
(7) L and L0 are the length and span of the slab, respectively. The exposed span of the simply-supported slab is 3050 mm.
(8) o is water content at ambient temperature.
Fig. 2. Layout of non-prestressed steel bars and prestressing steel wires in UPSS-1: (a) layout of non-prestressed steel bars and (b) profile of prestressing steel wires.
Table 2
Key parameters of continuous slabs.
Specimens c (mm) PPR spe (MPa) Z Ap As b h (mm) L/L0 (mm) mfcu (MPa) o (%) Ages of the
specimens (d)
UPCS-1 15 0.37 657 0.36 3jp5 2j8 + 2j10 600 70 5300/2550 2 56.9 3.98 57
UPCS-2 15 0.53 823 0.50 3jp5 2j6.5 + 2j8 600 70 5300/2550 2 56.9 3.98 57
UPCS-3 15 0.69 1019 0.59 3jp5 3j6.5 600 70 5300/2550 2 48.2 3.50 53
UPCS-4 25 0.39 918 0.58 2jp5 4j8 600 80 5300/2550 2 40.1 2.77 71
UPCS-5 25 0.56 972 0.33 3jp5 4j8 600 80 5300/2550 2 52.1 2.36 68
UPCS-6 25 0.74 760 0.36 4jp5 3j6.5 600 80 5300/2550 2 48.2 3.50 69
UPCS-7 30 0.41 1000 0.42 2jp5 5j8 600 85 5300/2550 2 52.1 2.36 68
UPCS-8 30 0.59 753 0.48 3jp5 3j6.5 + 1j8 600 85 5300/2550 2 52.0 3.29 65
UPCS-9 30 0.73 830 0.32 4jp5 2j6.5 + 1j8 600 85 5300/2550 2 52.0 3.29 66
Note: Non-prestressed steel bars and prestressing steel wire of the critical section at mid-span of slabs have the same concrete cover thickness, and the concrete cover at
intermediate support section is 5 mm. The exposed span of slabs UPCS-1,UPCS-7, and UPCS-8 is 2350 mm, and the exposed span of slabs UPCS-2 UPCS-6, and UPCS-9 is 2120 mm.
It should be mentioned here that the crack distribution on the in the continuous slabs UPCS-3 and UPCS-6. Two jp5 prestressing
unexposed surface at the intermediate support of the continuous steel wires in the continuous slab UPCS-3 were broken, as
slab was similar to that at ambient temperature. Water began shown in Fig. 13. In the continuous slab UPCS-6, not only were
spilling over the surface of the slabs which was not exposed to two jp5 prestressing steel wires broken, but spalling also
fire, yielding a little water vapor after 11–18 min of heating. occurred at the non-exposed surface after 43 min heating, and
Water appeared near the embedded parts first, and then in more so a hole of 50 mm diameter and 860 mm from the tensioning
and more places, but reduced after the initial stages, and end appeared. After 45 min heating, the slab was broken in a
disappeared gradually after 50 min of heating. section of 920 mm from the tensioning end, and at 55 min
Simply-supported slab UPSA-2 suddenly disrupted after another break of the slab occurred 900 mm from the anchorage
26 min of heating because of concrete spalling at the exposed end; spalling occurred at the exposed surface and progressed
surface and exposure of the reinforcement to the fire, as through the depth of the entire slab, as shown in Fig. 14. Concrete
shown in Fig. 12. Four jp5 prestressing steel wires and one j8 spalling and the crack distribution of the other slabs are shown in
reinforcement were broken in the fire. Concrete spalling occurred Figs. 15–22.
W.Z. Zheng et al. / Fire Safety Journal 45 (2010) 283–297 287
1000
800
Temperature (°C)
600
ISO834 Standrad heating curve
Test average temperature in furnce
400
200
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Time (min)
Table 3
Schedule of spalling and overflowing in surface subjected to fire.
Specimens First time of Last time of Beginning time of water Total heating time Maximum depth Area of spalling
spalling (min) spalling (min) overflowing (min) (min) of spalling (mm) (%)
UPSS-2 15 20 15 68 25 13.1
UPSS-3 17 20 18 68 10 2.92
UPSS-7 11 18 13 112 6 0.65
UPSS-8 11 19 14 112 10 1.65
UPSS-9 12 19 14 112 20 11.6
UPSA-2 10 20 13 28 47 63.1
UPSA-S 11 22 13 28 23 48.4
PSS-1 12 18 15 112 16 2.19
UPCS-3 10 22 16 60 49 21.3
UPCS-6 7 36 13 55 Perforation 27.0
UPCS-9 4 11 11 90 15 2.19
1200
1200 1200
Heating time(68min)
1000 Heating time(68min)
Slab being suspended by screw(57min) 1000 Slab being suspended by screw(53min) 1000
Stress (MPa)
800
Stress (MPa)
800
Stress (MPa)
800 firing stopped
firing stopped
Heating time(68min)
600 600
firing stopped 600 Slab being suspended by screw(58min)
0 0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Time (min) Time (min) Time (min)
1200 1200 1200
Heating time(68min)
Heating time(68min)
1000 1000 1000
Stress (MPa)
Stress (MPa)
Stress (MPa)
800 firing stopped 800 800
firing stopped firing stopped
600 600 Heating time(112min)
600
Slab being suspended by screw(94min)
400 400 400
0 0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Time (min) Time (min) Time (min)
1200 1200
Heating time (112min) 1200
1000 1000 Slab being suspended by screw (99min)
1000 Heating time (112min)
firing stopped
Stress (MPa)
Stress (MPa)
firing stopped
Stress (MPa)
800 800 800
firing stopped
Heating time (112min)
600 600 600
400 400 400
200 200 200
0 0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Time (min) Time (min) Time (min)
Stress (MPa)
Stress (MPa)
0 0 0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Time (min) Time (min) Time (min)
1200
Heating time (28min)
1000
Stress (MPa)
800
600
400
200
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Time (min)
Fig. 9. The stress–time curves of the unbonded prestressing steel wires in simply-supported slabs subjected to fire. (a) UPSS-1, (b) UPSS-2, (c) UPSS-3, (d) UPSS-4,
(e) UPSS-5, (f) UPSS-6, (g) UPSS-7, (h) UPSS-8, (i) UPSS-9, (j) UPSA-1, (k) UPSA-2, (l) UPSA-3, and (m) UPSA-4.
290 W.Z. Zheng et al. / Fire Safety Journal 45 (2010) 283–297
1200 1200
1000 1000 Heating time (60min)
Heating time (60min)
Stress (MPa)
Stress (MPa)
800 800
600 600
400 400
firing stopped firing stopped
200 200
0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Time (min) Time (min)
1200 1200
1000 1000 Heating time(60min)
Stress (MPa)
Stress (MPa)
800 The prestressing steel wire
800
was broken at 29min
600 600
400 400
firing stopped
200 200
0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Time (min) Time (min)
1200
1200
1000 Heating time(90min)
1000
Stress (MPa)
800
Stress (MPa)
800 800
600 600
400 400
firing stopped
firing stopped
200 200
0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Time (min) Time (min)
1200
800
600
400
firing stopped
200
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Time (min)
Fig. 10. The stress–time curves of the unbonded prestressing steel wires in continuous slabs subjected to fire. (a) UPCS-1, (b) UPCS-2, (c) UPCS-3, (d) UPCS-4, (e) UPCS-5,
(f) UPCS-6, (g) UPCS-7, (h) UPCS-8, and (i) UPCS-9.
W.Z. Zheng et al. / Fire Safety Journal 45 (2010) 283–297 291
5.0 5.5
3.5
4.0 Heating time (60min)
3.0 Heating time (60min)
2.5 3.5
0 40 80 120 160 200 0 40 80 120 160 200
Time (min) Time (min)
4.0
Side support reactrion (kN)
2.5
3.5
2.0 Heating time (90min) The slab was disrupted at 35min
1.5 3.0
0 40 80 120 160 200 0 10 20 30 40
Time (min) Time (min)
5.5 5.5
Side support reactrion (kN)
4.5
4.5 The anchorage end
The tensioning end
4.0
Heating time (90min)
4.0 Heating time(55min)
3.5
3.5
0 40 80 120 160 200 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Time (min) Time (min)
5.0
Side support reactrion (kN)
4.0
3.5
2.5
0 40 80 120 160 200
Time (min)
Fig. 11. Support reaction–time curves of the continuous slabs subjected to fire. Note: The anchorage end means the side support reaction at the anchorage end, while the
tensioning end means the side support reaction at the tensioning end. (a) UPCS-1, (b) UPCS-2, (c) UPCS-3, (d) UPCS-4, (e) UPCS-5, (f) UPCS-6, (g) UPCS-7, (h) UPCS-8, and
(i) UPCS-9.
292 W.Z. Zheng et al. / Fire Safety Journal 45 (2010) 283–297
Fig. 12. Concrete spalling and reinforcement breaking in UPSA-2 simply-supported slab: (a) spalling of exposed surface, (b) reinforcement breaking, and (c) area and depth
of concrete spalling (hatched means spalling, number in the hatched area means the maximum depth of spalling).
Fig. 13. Concrete spalling, reinforcement breaking, and crack distribution in UPCS-3 continuous slab: (a) spalling of exposed surface, (b) reinforcement breaking, and
(c) area and depth of concrete spalling and crack distribution.
W.Z. Zheng et al. / Fire Safety Journal 45 (2010) 283–297 293
Fig. 14. Spalling of concrete, reinforcement breaking, and crack distribution in UPCS-6 continuous slab: (a) spalling of exposed surface, (b) slab breaking subjected to fire,
(c) spalling hole of unexposed surface, (d) reinforcement breaking, and (e) area and maximum depth of spalling of concrete and crack distribution.
Fig. 15. Spalling of concrete and crack distribution in UPSS-2 simply-supported slab.
normal stress level s(T)¼ sct(T) mft(T) of concrete extreme fiber Fig. 27 shows that all spalling points are subjacent to the top
in the pre-compression zone of the slab at elevated temperature envelope surface of concrete spalling, and the top envelope
as the z-axis. Points with different concrete strengths and water surface of concrete spalling is expressed as
contents are shown in Fig. 27, and the top envelope surface of
concrete spalling is also drawn in Fig. 27. sðTÞ ¼ ð0:0068mfcu þ1:7763Þ ð0:5053o1:6100Þ ð3Þ
294 W.Z. Zheng et al. / Fire Safety Journal 45 (2010) 283–297
Fig. 16. Spalling of concrete and crack distribution in UPSS-3 simply-supported slab.
Fig. 17. Spalling of concrete and crack distribution in UPSS-7 simply-supported slab.
Fig. 18. Spalling of concrete and crack distribution in UPSS-8 simply-supported slab.
Fig. 19. Spalling of concrete and crack distribution in UPSS-9 simply-supported slab.
4.2. Top envelope curve and surface of concrete spalling based on temperature as the y-axis, and by taking the water content in
normal stress of concrete extreme fiber in pre-compressive zone at concrete at ambient temperature as the x-axis and the normal
ambient temperature stress level of concrete extreme fiber in the pre-compression zone
of the slab at ambient temperature as the y-axis.
To facilitate design and application, two expressions for the Following the method of drawing the top envelope curve of
top envelope curve of concrete spalling are presented by taking concrete spalling at elevated temperature, the top envelope
the average standard concrete cube strength at ambient tem- curves of concrete spalling based on the normal stress level of
perature as the x-axis and the normal stress level of concrete concrete extreme fiber pre-compressive zone at ambient tem-
extreme fiber in the pre-compression zone of the slab at ambient perature are obtained, as shown in Figs. 28 and 29. Corresponding
W.Z. Zheng et al. / Fire Safety Journal 45 (2010) 283–297 295
Fig. 21. Spalling of concrete and crack distribution in PSS-1 simply-supported slab.
Fig. 22. Spalling of concrete and crack distribution in UPCS-9 continuous slab.
4
Top envelope curve of spalling
3.50
2 2.67
3.98
0 1.83
3.29
(T) (MPa)
-2 3.49
2.77
-4
-6 Spalling points
No-spalling points
-8
expressions are given as Eqs. (4) and (5). It should be mentioned Fig. 25. Spalling points, non-spalling points, and top envelope curve of spalling in
here that the values used for s ¼ sct mft in the y-axis of Figs. 28 o s(T) coordinates. (Numbers near spalling points are water weight contents at
ambient temperature of the points. The results are for ISO834 heating and
and 29 are the values at ambient temperature.
calcareous concrete.)
(
s ¼ 0:001943mfcu 2:319 ð20 r mfcu r47:5Þ
ð4Þ
s ¼ 0:04784mfcu 4:500 ð47:5 o mfcu r65Þ The expression of the top envelope surface of concrete spalling
is presented by taking the average standard concrete cube strength
( at ambient temperature as the x-axis, the water content in concrete
s ¼ 0:02869o2:328 ð1:6 r o r 3:5Þ
ð5Þ at ambient temperature as the y-axis, and the normal stress level
s ¼ 0:9383o5:511 ð3:5 o o r 4:5Þ s ¼ sct mft of concrete extreme fiber in the pre-compression zone
296 W.Z. Zheng et al. / Fire Safety Journal 45 (2010) 283–297
0
5 41.3
-1
48.2
-2
0 52.1
(T) (MPa)
22.9 47.3
-3 41.3
(MPa)
-4
-5 41.0
-5
-6
-10 Spalling points
-7
60 5 No-spalling points
4 -8
μf 40 3
c (M -9
Pa 2 (%)
) 20 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4.0 4.2
1
(%)
Fig. 27. Distribution of spalling points, non-spalling points, and top envelope
surface of spalling in mfcu wsðTÞ coordinates (‘‘ ’’ is non-spalling points and Fig. 29. Spalling points, non-spalling points, and top envelope curve of spalling in
‘‘,’’spalling points. The results are for ISO834 heating and calcareous concrete). o s coordinates. (Numbers near spalling points are average standard concrete
cubic strengths at ambient temperature of the points. The results are for ISO834
heating and calcareous concrete.)
1
0
Top envelope curve of spalling
-1 3.50
1.83 5
-2 3.98
2.67 3.29
-3
(MPa)
3.49 0
-4
(MPa)
2.77
-5
-5
-6
Spalling points
-7
No-spalling points -10
-8
60 5
-9 4
20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 μfc 40
(M 3
fcu (MPa) Pa 2
) 20 1 (%)
Fig. 28. Spalling points, non-spalling points, and top envelope curve of spalling in
Fig. 30. Distribution of spalling points, non-spalling points, and top envelope
mfcu s coordinates. (Numbers near spalling points are water weight contents at
surface of spalling in mfcu ws coordinates (‘‘ ’’ is no-spalling points, and ‘‘,’’
ambient temperature of the points. The results are for ISO834 heating and
spalling points. The results are for ISO834 heating and calcareous concrete).
calcareous concrete.)
W.Z. Zheng et al. / Fire Safety Journal 45 (2010) 283–297 297
support; the nominal compressive stress of concrete extreme fiber (No. 2001-8), and the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Harbin
in exposed surface of slabs UPCS-1 and UPCS-9 at elevated Institute of Technology.
temperature is bigger, but the nominal tensile stress of concrete
extreme fiber on non-exposed surface of slabs UPCS-1 and UPCS-9 References
near the intermediate support is bigger. So the cracks near the
intermediate support of the non-exposed surface increased the [1] K.D. Hertz, L.S. Sorensen, Test method for spalling of fire exposed concrete,
permeability of the concrete, and water overflows on the non- Fire Safety Journal 40 (5) (2005) 466–476.
exposed surface of slabs UPCS-1 and UPCS-9 more easily than the [2] K.D. Hertz, Limits of spalling of fire exposed concrete, Fire Safety Journal 38
(2) (2003) 103–116.
other slabs, which leads to the development of lower pore
[3] V.K.R. Kodur, T.C. Wang, F.P. Cheng, Predicting the fire resistance behaviour of
pressure and in turn less spalling. Overall, the expression of the high strength concrete columns, Cement & Concrete Composites 26 (2)
top envelope surface of concrete spalling leads to conservative (2004) 141–153.
[4] F. Kelly, J. Purkiss, Reinforced concrete structures in fire: a review of current
estimates for spalling predictions.
rules, The Structural Engineer 86 (19) (2008) 33–39.
[5] Z.P. Bazant, W. Thonguthai, Pore pressure in heated concrete walls:
theoretical prediction, Magazine of Concrete Research 101 (31) (1979) 67–76.
5. Conclusions [6] V.K.R. Kodur, L. Phan, Critical factors governing the fire performance of high
strength concrete systems, Fire Safety Journal 42 (6-7) (2007) 482–488.
[7] V.K.R. Kodur, Guidelines for fire resistance design of high strength concrete
1. Experiments on the fire resistance of 15 PC simply-supported columns, Journal of Fire Protection Engineering 15 (2) (2005) 93–106.
slabs and 9 two-span PC continuous slabs have been [8] P. Kalifa, F.D. Menneteau, D Quenard., Spalling and pore pressure in HPC at
completed. Spalling of concrete, breaking of the tension high temperature, Cement and Concrete Research 30 (12) (2000) 1915–1927.
[9] Y.N.S. Chan, G.F. Peng, M. Anson, Fire behavior of high performance concrete
reinforcements, and the distribution and development of made with silica fume at different moisture contents, ACI Materials Journal
cracks for 8 simply-supported slabs and 3 continuous slabs 96 (3) (1999) 405–409.
are described. Spalling occurred within the concrete tempera- [10] A.N. Noumowe, R. Siddique, G. Debicki, Permeability of high-performance
concrete subjected to elevated temperature (600 1C), Construction and
ture range 200–500 1C.
Building Materials 23 (5) (2009) 1855–1861.
2. The nominal stress of concrete and concrete strength have [11] D. Gawin, C.E. Majorana, B.A. Schrefler, Numerical analysis of hygro-thermic
significant influence on the extend of spalling in concrete, but behaviour and damage of concrete at high temperature, Mechanics of
the water content has a minor effect on spalling. However, Cohesive-Frictional Materials 4 (1999) 37–74.
[12] P. Kalifa, G. Chene, C. Galle, High-temperature behavior of HPC with
concrete strength is an indirect contributing factor; it is related to polypropylene fibers: from spalling to microstructure, Cement & Concrete
permeability. Preliminary conclusions drawn are that concrete Composites 31 (10) (2001) 1487–1499.
spalls more easily or more seriously when the compressive stress [13] M.B. Dwaikat, V.K.R. Kodur, Hydrothermal model for predicting fire-induced
spalling in concrete structural systems, Fire Safety Journal 44 (3) (2009)
is higher or the tensile stress is lower on the surface exposed to 425–434.
fire and when the strength of the concrete and the water content [14] E. Ellobody, C.G. Bailey, Modelling of unbonded post-tensioned concrete slabs
in the concrete at ambient temperature are higher. under fire conditions, Fire Safety Journal 44 (2) (2009) 159–167.
[15] W.Z. Zheng, X.M. Hou, Experiment and analysis on the mechanical behaviour
3. Based on the test results, expressions for the top envelope of PC simply-supported slabs subjected to fire, Advances in Structural
curve and the surface of concrete spalling are presented by Engineering 11 (1) (2008) 71–89.
curve fitting for ISO834 heating and calcareous concrete only. [16] C.G. Bailey, E. Ellobody, Fire tests on unbonded post-tensioned one-way
concrete slabs, Magazine of Concrete Research 61 (1) (2009) 67–76.
The criteria can be used for preliminary judging the possibility [17] G.M.E Cooke, Behaviour of precast concrete floor slabs exposed to
of spalling in PC members subjected to fire. standardized fires, Fire Safety Journal 36 (4) (2001) 459–475.
[18] International Standard ISO 834-1-1999(E), Fire-resistance tests: elements of
building construction—Part 1: general requirements, International Organiza-
Acknowledgements tion for Standardization, Switzerland, 1999.
[19] Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures, Part 1–2: general Rules–structural
fire design, prEN 1992-1-2, British Standards Institution, London, British,
The work presented in this paper is supported by the National 2005.
Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 50678050), the [20] GB/T9978, Fire-resistance tests—elements of building construction, 1999.
[21] BS. Fire tests on building materials and structures—Part 20: method from
Changjiang Scholars Program of China (No. 2009-37), the Out- determination of the fire resistance of elements of construction (general
standing Youth Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province principles), BS 476-3:1987, BSi, UK, 1987.