Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
38 views5 pages

Research Reviewer

The document discusses key aspects of developing a strong research hypothesis and methodology. It notes that a hypothesis should be testable and based on existing theories and knowledge. It should articulate predictable relationships between variables. A literature review is important to identify existing research and avoid duplication. The review should analyze, synthesize and critically evaluate sources. Finally, an effective research design specifies the study parameters and provides a work plan for investigation and data collection and analysis to test the hypothesis.

Uploaded by

enriquezchloe167
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
38 views5 pages

Research Reviewer

The document discusses key aspects of developing a strong research hypothesis and methodology. It notes that a hypothesis should be testable and based on existing theories and knowledge. It should articulate predictable relationships between variables. A literature review is important to identify existing research and avoid duplication. The review should analyze, synthesize and critically evaluate sources. Finally, an effective research design specifies the study parameters and provides a work plan for investigation and data collection and analysis to test the hypothesis.

Uploaded by

enriquezchloe167
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

RESEARCH REVIEWER - A hypothesis articulates predictions about the findings of your

research.
- It goes beyond a mere guess, relying on existing theories and
Research Process knowledge.
- The hypothesis must be testable, allowing support or refutation
through scientific research methods.
1. Identification of Research Problem - Scientific research methods include experiments, observations,
- A problem identified by the researcher serves as a focal point and statistical analysis of data.
throughout the research process.
- It forms the foundation for all subsequent research activities. - Variables in Hypotheses:
- Guides the researcher in developing the hypothesis, - Hypotheses propose a relationship between two or more
workplan, interpretation of findings, and conclusion. variables in research.
- Each step in the process and its corresponding output is - Independent variables are manipulated or controlled by the
essential and valuable in relation to the identified problem. researcher.
- The significance of the identified problem is a key evaluation - Dependent variables are observed and measured by the
criterion for assessing research success. researcher.
- In identifying the research problem, clarity, organization, and
specificity are crucial. - Developing a Hypothesis:
- The problem statement must define the scope and set limits 1. Ask a Question:
to determine the feasibility of the investigation. - Begin with a focused, specific, and researchable question.

2. Do Some Preliminary Research:


2. Formulation of Hypotheses - Construct a conceptual framework to identify study variables
- The hypothesis functions as a tentative solution to the problem and their relationships.
before experimentation.
- It serves as a crucial guide in the research work or design. 3. Formulate Your Hypothesis:
- The hypothesis is tested through actual experimentation. - Write a clear, concise sentence reflecting your initial answer
- It is grounded in the objectives of the study, guiding the to the research question.
experimental design.
4. Refine Your Hypothesis:
- Ensure specificity and testability.
- Include: - Even experienced researchers utilize this step to avoid
- Relevant variables. duplicating others' studies, unless validation with advanced
- Specific group being studied. techniques is necessary.
- Predicted outcome of the experiment or analysis. - The process ensures researchers stay informed about existing
knowledge and potential research gaps.
5. Phrase Your Hypothesis in Three Ways:
- Use if…then form to identify variables. - Initiating the Literature Review:
- If a first-year student starts attending more lectures, then - Begins before formulating research aims and objectives.
their exam scores will improve. - Aims to check if the research problem has been addressed
- For statistical hypothesis testing, include a null hypothesis previously.
(H0) assuming no association.
- Primary Focus of Literature Review:
- Note: - Conducted mainly after formulating research aims and
- Hypotheses should be based on existing knowledge and objectives.
theories. - Utilizes various secondary data sources: books, newspapers,
- Must be testable through scientific research methods magazines, journals, online articles, etc.
(experiments, observations, statistical analysis).
- Purpose of Writing a Literature Review:
- The hypothesis can be stated in various forms: - Essential when writing a thesis, dissertation, or research paper.
a. The null statement - Avoids duplication: Prevents repeating recent work.
b. The alternative statement - Finds existing knowledge: Identifies what others have learned
c. The cause and effect and reported on the problem.
- Familiarizes with methodology: Helps understand
methodologies followed by others.
3. Review of Related Literature - Relevance of concepts and theories: Assists in understanding
- In some cases, a research problem is not immediately relevant concepts and theories in the research area.
recognized; preliminary literature surveys are essential. - Identifies controversies and inconsistencies: Highlights
- A preliminary survey involves reading various publications and significant debates and contradictions in findings.
exploring the internet. - Uncovers unanswered research questions: Reveals areas with
- It helps in becoming aware of previous works and may inspire gaps in knowledge.
ideas for research investigations.
- Develops an analytical framework: Aids in constructing an
analytical framework for the research. - A research design serves as the work plan for the research
- Expands consideration of variables: Encourages inclusion of investigation.
variables not initially considered. - Specifies resources needed and how they will be utilized to
address the problem.
- Writing Tips for the Literature Review: - Systematizes work during actual experimentation.
- Maximizes research output by providing a plan to follow and
- Summarize and Synthesize: revise if necessary.
- Provide an overview of each source's main points. - Facilitates efficient experimentation, guiding the researcher in
- Combine information into a coherent whole. the laboratory.
- Ensures only relevant data is collected, specifying how and what
- Analyze and Interpret: data should be obtained.
- Go beyond paraphrasing, add personal interpretations. - A valid research design is fundamental to the validity of the
- Discuss the significance of findings in relation to the entire entire research.
literature.
- The research design is a practical framework for answering
- Critically Evaluate: research questions.
- Mention strengths and weaknesses of sources. - Involves decisions about data type, collection and analysis
methods, location, and timescale.
- Well-Structured Writing: - Priorities drive decisions: determine causes/effects, draw
- Use well-structured paragraphs with transition words and topic generalizable conclusions, or understand specific context details.
sentences. - Essential components of a research design include:
- Draw connections, comparisons, and contrasts. - Type of data needed
- Location and timescale of the research
- Characteristics of a Good Literature Review: - Participants and sources
- Doesn't merely summarize sources; it analyzes, synthesizes, and - Variables and hypotheses (if relevant)
critically evaluates. - Methods for collecting and analyzing data
- Provides a clear picture of the existing knowledge on the - Sets parameters for the project, determining inclusions and
subject. exclusions.
- Defines criteria for evaluating results and drawing conclusions.
4. Preparation of Research Design
- Reliability and validity hinge on how data is collected, measured, - Independent variable: Manipulated condition within the
analyzed, and interpreted. experiment.
- Crucial for a successful research proposal, scientific paper, or - Dependent variable: Event or outcome affected by the
dissertation. manipulation of the independent variable.
- Factors to consider in creating a research design:
1. Consider Your Priorities and Practicalities:
- Multiple possible research designs with tradeoffs. 6. Data Analysis and Interpretation
- Choices depend on priorities, involving some tradeoffs.
2. Addressing Weaknesses: - Data gathered are organized into tables and graphs before
- If one design is weak in an area, another design can cover that analysis using statistical methods.
aspect of the research study. - Statistical conclusions are explained in simpler terms related to
3. Adaptability to Different Priorities: research objectives.
- Research design depends on researcher priorities, allowing for
multiple designs based on study goals. - A crucial step during an experiment involves data analysis,
interpretation, and conclusion formulation.
5. Actual Experimentation - Data can be analyzed through:
- Presentation in table format (data table).
- Actual experimentation implements the research work plan or - Processing data through graphical manipulation to visually
design. discern variable differences.
- An experiment is a learning task that generates observations or
data. - Scientific data collection requires careful and systematic
- Processing and analyzing the data result in solving the research approaches.
problem or triggering further studies. - Systematic and consistent data collection methods are crucial for
building on existing work.
- In the experimental method, a condition or parameter (variable) - Detailed records are essential for transparency and
is consciously manipulated. reproducibility.
- The manipulated condition is often referred to as a treatment. - Thoughtful and systematic collection, analysis, and interpretation
- The outcome or effect of the manipulation is observed on other of data allow development into evidence.
variables. - Data collection involves systematic recording; data analysis
- Variables have different names based on their role: uncovers patterns and trends.
- Data interpretation explains these patterns and trends, influenced - Steps to consider in the conclusion:
by scientists' knowledge and experience. - Answer the main research question.
- Different scientists may interpret the same data differently. - Summarize and reflect on the research.
- Publishing data and analysis techniques allow review and use in - Make recommendations for future work.
future research by the scientific community. - Emphasize contributions to knowledge in the field.
- Examples provided for framing answers, summarizing research,
making recommendations, and emphasizing contributions.
7. Formulation of Conclusion - Recommendations should be framed as suggestions rather than
imperatives for practical implementation.
- A conclusion summarizes the significant results of the - Ensure recommendations for further research don't undermine
experiment. the completed work.
- Marks the end of the research, often suggesting unanswered
questions for future investigations.
- Allows readers to evaluate the merit of completed research based
on objectives and conclusion.

- Conclusions assess the achievement of research aims and


objectives.
- Justification of why research aims and objectives have been met
is necessary.
- Includes coverage of research limitations and suggestions for
future studies.
- The main purposes of a conclusion are to:
- Clearly state the answer to the main research question.
- Summarize and reflect on the research.
- Make recommendations for future work on the topic.
- Show the new knowledge contributed.

- The conclusion should be concise and engaging, leaving the


reader with a clear understanding of the main discovery or
argument.

You might also like