CSEC® Agricultural Science – DOUBLE AWARD

Rubric for Crop and Broiler Production Investigations

ITEM DESCRIPTOR Marks

Total Awarded
Name of Student - -
Student Registration Number - -
Name of School - -
Title of Project - -
Start Date - -
Termination Date - -
Table of Contents - -
Provided a clear and accurate
INTRODUCTION (6) Literature summary of literature reviewed 2
Review (3)
At least 3 references cited in 1
summary
Problem statement clearly written 1
Technical /technology related
Aim (2) objective addressing production 1
and post-production levels
Income related 1
Experimental design clearly 1
Experimental Described
Design (2) Comparison of production technology
/ management practice 1
/ value-addition technology
METHODOLOGY (11) Materials and Materials 1
Equipment (2) Tools and Equipment 1
Activities (production and processing) (4) 4

Data Collection - Data (at least 2 sets) and how it was 3

collected (3)
RESULTS (9) Presented and described data including performance of
Production and Post- value added products / comparison of value added 3
Production and non-value added product where applicable (3)
Value Addition (where Interpreted results accurately (3) 3
applicable) Presented results properly (2) 2
Labelled tables, charts (1) 1
How technical Provided a full discussion of 1
results relate to results”
the issue (2) Relating results to literature 1
DISCUSSION (8) accurately with reference
Effect of the discussed the effect of technology
technology used used during production/post- 2
during production as it relates to value
production/
CSEC® Agricultural Science – DOUBLE AWARD
Rubric for Crop and Broiler Production Investigations

after production / addition with supporting evidence

for value addition and cited relevant literature
(2)
Fully discussed the effect of technical
Effect of technical / technology on profitability and
/ technology on referring to relevant data with 2
profitability (2) supporting evidence and cited
relevant
Literature
Overall findings Fully discussed the findings as it
as it relates to relates to issue with supporting 2
the issue (2) evidence and cited relevant
Literature
Based on outcomes with respect to 1
CONCLUSION, Conclusion (2) technical / technological aspects
LIMITATION & Based on outcomes and income 1
RECOMMENDATIONS Aspect
(4) Limitations (1) 1
Recommendations (1) 1
Less than 5 spelling and grammatical errors contained 1
PRESENTATION (2) in the report (1)
At least 3 references properly cited (1) 1

TOTAL (Technical Report) 40 ÷ 2 …… ÷ 2

= 20 = ………

Projected Income – output, price, 1

COST ANALYSIS Total
(10) Complete Budget Projected Expenditure – inputs, 1
(Please tick √ price, total
which is Surplus/Shortfall correctly calculated 1
applicable) Income/Sale of Produce – quantity, 1
Actual Income & price, total
 1 Expenditure Expenditure – quantity, price, total 1
(Production, Post- Surplus/Shortfall correctly calculated 1
Production) Provides a full and accurate 4
or Comparison of comparison of all 3 parameters
 2 Projected and Actual Partially compares all 3 parameters 3
(Production, Post- - Income Correctly compares any 2 2
Production and - Expenditure Parameters
Value Addition) - Surplus/shortfall Correctly compares any 1 parameter 1
Did not attempt to compare any 0
Parameter
TOTAL COST ANALYSIS 10