Smart
Smart
[Issue 36]
Abstract
Wellness tourism, a burgeoning trend, entails travellers seeking destinations that offer services aimed at
enhancing physical, mental, and emotional well-being. This study delved into the relationship between tourists'
wellness experiences, their satisfaction levels, and their intentions to revisit such destinations. It also explored
the mediating role of tourist satisfaction and the moderating influence of gender in this context. Data were
collected from individuals who had experienced wellness tourism using a purposive sampling approach. Out of
500 questionnaires distributed to tourists visiting Uttarakhand for wellness services, 438 valid responses were
gathered. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS 23.0 and SmartPLS 4.0. The findings underscored the
significant impact of educational, entertainment, and escapist experiences on tourists' revisit intentions, with the
exception of the esthetic experience. Importantly, all four experiences positively and significantly affected tourist
satisfaction. Furthermore, the study revealed that the favourable effects of wellness tourism on tourists'
intentions to revisit could be reinforced through the mediating role of satisfaction. Additionally, gender emerged
as a significant moderating factor. This research provides valuable insights for researchers and marketers
interested in understanding visitor satisfaction and revisit intentions in the context of wellness tourism.
Key words: Gender, Mediator, Moderator, Revisit Intentions, Tourist Satisfaction, Wellness Tourism
Experience
Educational Experience and Tourist Satisfaction Esthetic Experience and Tourist Satisfaction
Experiences in wellness tourism that provide The majority of earlier research on visitor
visitors with a chance to get away from the pressures satisfaction utilises it as an auxiliary variable to
and strains of daily life may have a significant investigate how it mediates the link between the cause
influence on visitor happiness. Travellers’ feelings of and effect factors (Su et al., 2015; Biswas et al., 2021;
pleasure are often high when they feel as if they have Su et al., 2022). The mediation role of tourist
actually fled and sought sanctuary in a location satisfaction in the association between wellness
(Quadri-Felitti & Fiore, 2013). Studies found that tourism experience and tourist revisit intentions is a
tourist are more likely to be satisfied with their trip crucial concept in understanding how these variables
when they find the escape they are looking for (Boo et are interconnected. In this context, mediation implies
al., 2018; Ko et al., 2018). The ability to disconnect that tourist satisfaction acts as an intermediary factor
from the hectic lifestyle contributes significantly to that helps explain how and why wellness tourism
overall satisfaction (Liu et al., 2023). Hence, the experiences influence tourists' intentions to revisit.
hypothesis as given below was framed: Tourist satisfaction is influenced by the wellness
H2c: Escapist Experience significantly tourism experience (Ko et al., 2018). When tourists
Journal of tourism
[Issue 36]
have positive, fulfilling, and enriching experiences Understanding and addressing these differences can
during their wellness trips, they tend to be more help tourism providers create more tailored and
satisfied. A model of the factors determining visitor effective strategies for both male and female tourists
satisfaction has been developed by some researchers (Kim et al., 2020). However, it was not examined
who looked at the tourism experience as a pre-variable previously whether gender moderates the association
to that outcome (Jo et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2015). between wellness tourism experience (education,
Some other scholars have investigated the relationship entertainment, esthetic, and escapist) and tourist
between visitor satisfaction and the antecedent factors satisfaction with revisit intentions. Thus, the following
influencing visitor willingness to return, and they hypotheses are framed:
discovered that visitor satisfaction had a favourable H5a. Gender moderates the association
influence on visitor intent to return (Chi, 2012; Prayag between Educational Experience and Tourist Revisit
et al., 2017; Kim et al., 2020). However, the Intentions
relationship between the wellness tourism experience H5b. Gender moderates the association
(education, entertainment, escapist, and esthetic) and between Entertainment Experience and Revisit
visitor intentions to return has not been specifically Intentions
analysed in prior research. Thus, the following H5c. Gender moderates the association
hypotheses are framed: between Escapist Experience and Revisit Intentions
H4a. The association between Educational H5d. Gender moderates the association
Experience and Tourist Revisit Intentions significantly between Esthetic Experience and Revisit Intentions
mediated by Tourist satisfaction H5e. Gender moderates the association
H4b. The association between Entertainment between Tourist Satisfaction and Revisit Intentions
Experience and Revisit Intentions significantly
mediated by Tourist satisfaction III CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
H4c. The association between Escapist
Experience and Revisit Intentions significantly This study aims to find out if the wellness
mediated by Tourist satisfaction tourism experience influences the revisit intentions of
H4d. The association between Esthetic tourists through tourist satisfaction in India. Based on
Experience and Revisit Intentions significantly the previous literature and the hypotheses of this
mediated by Tourist satisfaction study, a conceptual framework has been developed as
given in Figure 1.
Moderating Role of Gender
Student 71 16.2
Private Employee 103 23.5
Occupation
Public Employee 138 31.5
Self-Employed 126 28.8
Below 25K 76 17.4
25-50K 151 34.5
Income PM
50-1 Lac 144 32.9
More than 1 Lac 67 15.3
Measurement Model Analysis there is an association between the variables that may
A collection of observed variables' factor be seen and the latent, or unobserved, notions that
structure is confirmed using the confirmatory factor underlie them (Child 1990). Additionally, the CFA
analysis (CFA) approach (Hair et al. 2012). It is would confirm that every item is adequately matched
determined using the CFA procedure if the proposed with the appropriate features of the overall construct
structure offers a good fit to the data. In other words, being assessed.
Journal of tourism
[Issue 36]
To Access the measurement model, the item 1967). Afterwards, composite reliability and Average
loadings in the measurement model were examined variance extracted (AVE) were examined for construct
and found to be higher than the minimum value of validity of the study with acceptable threshold of 0.50
0.60 (Kline, 2015). Then, Cronbach's alpha was used (Fornell and Larcker, 1981; Bagozzi and Yi, 1988)
to determine the inter-item reliability of the items, and 0.70 (Hair et al., 2010), respectively. All these
with a minimum threshold of 0.70 (Nunnally et al., results are depicted in Table 2.
Thereafter, the discriminant validity of scale ensure that the constructs being studied are indeed
variables was examined. The discriminant validity is measuring different aspects of the theoretical
defined “when the square root of the AVE (diagonal framework and not simply overlapping or redundant
values) of each construct is larger than its concepts. However, Henseler et al. (2015) challenged
corresponding correlation coefficients” (Fornell & this approach. Therefore, the HTMT technique
Larcker, 1981). The findings of the Fornell and Larker (Henseler et al. 2015) was used to further determine
assessment of discriminant validity According to the the discriminant validity, with a value not exceeding
criteria in Table 3, all values on the diagonals are 0.85 (Kline, 2005). Table 4's analysis of the study's
higher than the corresponding row and column values, findings reveals that all HTMT values satisfied the
demonstrating the scales are discriminant. It helps to requirement of being less than 0.85.
Journal of tourism
[Issue 36]
Structural Model Analysis ariables are tested for patterns of directional and non-
directional correlations using SEM (MacCallum
When the measurement model's findings are good, the 2012). The constructs' collinearity was examined prior
next step is to evaluate the structural model using to model evaluation. The VIF value of all the variables
PLS-SEM. The direct, total indirect, and moderation is less than 2.0, which indicates no issue with
effects are included in SmartPLS's analysis of the collinearity, according to Table 5, which maintains a
PLS-SEM algorithm's outputs. A collection of threshold of 5.0 (Ringle et al., 2015).
observable (measured) and unobserved (latent)
more satisfied. Subsequently, they tend to return to the other dimensions. Wellness experiences are not one-
same wellness place again in the future. Some dimensional but encompass various facets; each
previous studies also show similar results (Chi, 2012; contributing differently to tourist satisfaction and
Prayag et al., 2017; Kim et al., 2020). Moreover, revisit intentions. This understanding challenges
gender was found to be significantly moderating the traditional, simplistic views of wellness tourism.
relationship of educational and entertainment Moreover, the research underscores the importance of
experience with tourist revisit intention. This might be considering gender as a moderating variable in
due to the fact that the effect of wellness tourism tourism studies. This finding extends existing theories
experiences on revisit intentions is stronger for one by acknowledging that gender differences can
gender compared to the other (Karande et al., 2007; significantly influence how tourists respond to and
Moon, 2021). For instance, female tourists may be engage with wellness tourism experiences,
more influenced by positive wellness experiences in necessitating gender-sensitive frameworks.
their decisions to revisit than male tourists. Similarly,
female tourists may seek relaxation and spa Practical Implications
treatments, while male tourists may prioritize
adventure activities or sports (Pan et al., 2020; In terms of practical application, the current
Carballo et al., 2021). The results point to a rising and research offers business professionals in the market
inflated demand for wellness vacations in the future. helpful guidelines for creating wellness tourism
Wellness tourism is a fundamental change in how experiences. Destination marketers and wellness
tourists look to bolster their well-being. As a result, tourism providers can leverage the findings to enhance
resorts, hotels, tour operators, and local communities their marketing strategies. Promoting wellness
are being forced to reassess and revitalize their offers experiences that align with the dimensions found to be
in order to meet the rising demand for wellness significant (educational, entertainment) can attract a
experiences. This is changing the face of destinations. wider audience of wellness tourists. According to the
research findings, developing informative and
entertaining options at wellness locations may boost
visitor satisfaction and encourage more people to
return. To accommodate these characteristics,
wellness providers might vary their offerings.
Additionally, by recognizing the significance of the
educational, entertainment, and escapist dimensions,
wellness providers can curate more enriching and
diverse experiences that align with the interests of
tourists. This includes offering workshops, cultural
activities, and wellness programs that cater to these
dimensions. Moreover, the study supports the idea of
market segmentation within wellness tourism.
Figure: 2 Path Coefficients Wellness centres can segment their target markets
based on tourists' preferences for specific wellness
VII IMPLICATIONS dimensions, allowing for more personalized marketing
efforts. As per the results, tourist satisfaction is a
Theoretical Implications crucial mediator. It indicates that maintaining high
The study contributes to a deeper theoretical service quality is essential for wellness destinations to
understanding of the dynamics between wellness provide excellent wellness services. Continuous
tourism experiences, satisfaction, and revisit improvement in services, staff training, and facilities
intentions. It highlights the role of different can help boost satisfaction levels. The results
dimensions of wellness in shaping tourists' perceptions emphasize how crucial it is to perform empirical
and intentions, offering a more nuanced perspective research to guide decisions in the wellness tourism
on the field. It reinforces the idea that a positive sector. Planning strategically and allocating resources
experience goes beyond a one-time visit and can lead may be guided by on-going study and observation of
to sustained interest in the destination. Further, the visitor preferences and experiences.
exception of the esthetic experience in the model
raises questions about its significance in wellness
tourism. This finding prompts further theoretical
exploration into the factors that make the esthetic
aspect of wellness less influential in driving
satisfaction and revisiting intentions compared to
Journal of tourism
[Issue 36]
This research has a few drawbacks, regardless Wellness tourism experiences have gained
of its excellent contributions. These limitations can be popularity as individuals seek meaningful and
eliminated in future studies. First, the research sample rejuvenating travel experiences. They offer a chance
solely includes Indian wellness tourists, thus there are to recalibrate one's well-being, reconnect with oneself
no comparisons with other forms of wellness tourism and nature, and return home with a sense of renewal
in other nations. The survey's reach may be widened and energy. The study's findings show that visitor
in future research, and those studies can compare wellness experiences may be an effective way to
samples from other nations, making the results more increase visitors' desire to return. In response to the
broadly applicable. Second, this research examined features of wellness tourism, this paper develops a
only one potential mediating factor—tourist robust model using empirical evidence and finds that,
satisfaction—in its analysis of the effects of the with the exception of the esthetics experience, a
wellness tourism experience on visitors' inclinations to wellness tourism experience may elicit visitor
return. Thus, future studies should integrate other satisfaction, which favourably affects visitor return
factors for a comparative investigation of the intentions. The research has shown significant and
mediating impact, providing more thorough positive relationships between educational,
recommendations for the long-term growth of entertainment, tourist satisfaction, and revisit
wellness tourism and methods to enhance visitors' intentions by examining the moderating role of
revisit intentions. Moreover, other variables impacting gender. In addition, the moderating role of gender in
revisit intention should be included in the model(s). the relationship between wellness tourism experience
Third, only gender was examined as a moderating and tourist revisit intentions acknowledges that gender
variable, while other demographic variables might differences can impact how tourists perceive and
also act as a moderator. Thus, future studies could respond to wellness experiences. Moreover, the
incorporate other socio-demographic variables as well. theoretical and practical implications of the study shed
light on the complex interplay of wellness tourism
experiences, satisfaction, and revisit intentions.
REFERENCES
1. Ali, F., Ryu, K., & Hussain, K. (2016). Influence of experiences on memories, satisfaction and behavioral intentions: A study of creative
tourism. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 33(1), 85-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2015.1038418
2. Allied Market Research, (2021). Retrieved from: https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/wellness-tourism-market
3. Biswas, C., Deb, S. K., Hasan, A. A. T., & Khandakar, M. S. A. (2021). Mediating effect of tourists’ emotional involvement on the
relationship between destination attributes and tourist satisfaction. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 4(4), 490-510.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTI-05-2020-0075
4. Boo, S., & Busser, J. A. (2018). Tourists’ hotel event experience and satisfaction: an integrative approach. Journal of Travel & Tourism
Marketing, 35(7), 895-908. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2018.1445066
5. Carballo, R. R., León, C. J., & Carballo, M. M. (2022). Gender as moderator of the influence of tourists’ risk perception on destination
image and visit intentions. Tourism Review, 77(3), 913-924. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-02-2021-0079
6. Carrera, P. M., & Bridges, J. F. (2006). Globalization and healthcare: Understanding health and medical tourism. Expert Review of
Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 6(4), 447-454. https://doi.org/10.1586/14737167.6.4.447
7. Chen, C. C., & Petrick, J. F. (2016). The roles of perceived travel benefits, importance, and constraints in predicting travel behavior.
Journal of Travel Research, 55(4), 509-522. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287514563986
8. Chen, J. S., & Gursoy, D. (2001). An investigation of tourists’ destination loyalty and preferences. International Journal of
Contemporary Hospitality Management, 13(2), 79-85. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596110110381870
9. Chen, K. H., Huang, L., & Ye, Y. (2023). Research on the relationship between wellness tourism experiencescape and revisit intention:
A chain mediation model. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(3), 893-918.
10. Chen, Y., Cottam, E., & Lin, Z. (2020). The effect of resident-tourist value co-creation on residents’ well-being. Journal of Hospitality
and Tourism Management, 44, 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.05.009
11. Chi, C. G.-q. (2012). An Examination of Destination Loyalty: Differences Between FirstTime and Repeat Visitors. Journal of
Hospitality & Tourism Research, 36(1), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348010382235
12. Çoban, S. (2012). The effects of the image of destination on tourist satisfaction and loyalty: the case of Cappadocia. European Journal of
Social Sciences, 29(2), 222-232. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11787/1837
13. Dahanayake, S., Wanninayake, B., & Ranasinghe, R. (2023). Memorable experience studies in wellness tourism: systematic review &
bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Spa and Wellness, 6(1), 28-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/24721735.2022.2145417
14. Dillette, A. K., Douglas, A. C., & Andrzejewski, C. (2021). Dimensions of holistic wellness as a result of international wellness tourism
experiences. Current Issues in Tourism, 24(6), 794-810. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2020.1746247
15. Farmaki, A., & Stergiou, D. P. (2019). Escaping loneliness through Airbnb host-guest interactions. Tourism Management, 74, 331-333.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.04.006
16. Fetscherin, M., & Stephano, R.-M. (2016). The medical tourism index: Scale development and validation. Tourism Management, 52,
539-556.
17. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and
statistics.
Journal of tourism
[Issue 36]
18. Fritz, C., & Sonnentag, S. (2006). Recovery, well-being, and performance-related outcomes: the role of workload and vacation
experiences. Journal of Applied psychology, 91(4), 936-945. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.936
19. Garvanova, M., Staneva, K., & Garvanov, I. (2021). Wellness tourism approaches to improving quality of life of mobile users. CroDiM:
International Journal of Marketing Science, 4(1), 141-148. https://hrcak.srce.hr/254861
20. Global Wellness Institute. (2016, January). Statistics & facts. Retrieved from https://www.globalwellnessinstitute.org/ press-
room/statistics-and-facts/
21. Goodarzi, M., Haghtalab, N., & Shamshiry, E. (2016). Wellness tourism in Sareyn, Iran: resources, planning and development. Current
Issues in Tourism, 19(11), 1071-1076. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2015.1012192
22. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural
equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43, 115-135.
23. Huang, Y. C., Chen, C. C. B., & Gao, M. J. (2019). Customer experience, well-being, and loyalty in the spa hotel context: Integrating
the top-down & bottom-up theories of well-being. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 36(5), 595-611.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2019.1604293
24. Hunt, C. A., & Harbor, L. C. (2019). Pro-environmental tourism: Lessons from adventure, wellness and eco-tourism (AWE) in Costa
Rica. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2018.11.007
25. Hwang, J., & Lyu, S. O. (2015). The antecedents and consequences of well-being perception: An application of the experience economy
to golf tournament tourists. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 4(4), 248-257.
26. Iglesias, O., Markovic, S., & Rialp, J. (2019). How does sensory brand experience influence brand equity? Considering the roles of
customer satisfaction, customer affective commitment, and employee empathy. Journal of Business Research, 96, 343-354.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.043
27. Jo, W., Lee, C., & Reisinger, Y. (2014). Behavioral intentions of international visitors to the Korean hanok guest houses: quality, value
and satisfaction. Annals of Tourism Research, 47, 83-86. 10.1016/j.annals.2014.05.003
28. Karande, K., Magnini, V. P., & Tam, L. (2007). Recovery voice and satisfaction after service failure: an experimental investigation of
mediating and moderating factors. Journal of Service Research, 10(2), 187-203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670507309607
29. Kelly, C. (2010). Analysing wellness tourism provision: A retreat operators’ study. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management,
17(1), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1375/jhtm.17.1.108
30. Kim, W. H., Lee, S. H., & Kim, K. S. (2020). Effects of sensory marketing on customer satisfaction and revisit intention in the hotel
industry: the moderating roles of customers’ prior experience and gender. Anatolia, 31(4), 523-535.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13032917.2020.1783692
31. Ko, Y. S., Park, S. H., & Lee, K. Y. (2018). Railbike experience and tourist satisfaction. International Journal of Tourism Sciences,
18(1), 65-74.
32. Koskinen, V., & Wilska, T. A. (2019). Identifying and understanding spa tourists’ wellness attitudes. Scandinavian Journal of
Hospitality and Tourism, 19(3), 259-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250.2018.1467276
33. Lee, J., & Kim, H. (2015). Success factors of health tourism: Cases of Asian tourism cities. International Journal of Tourism Cities, 1(3),
216–233
34. Lee, S., Jeong, E., & Qu, K. (2020). Exploring theme park visitors’ experience on satisfaction and revisit intention: A utilization of
experience economy model. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 21(4), 474-497.
35. Lee, W., & Jeong, C. (2021). Distinctive roles of tourist eudaimonic and hedonic experiences on satisfaction and place attachment:
Combined use of SEM and necessary condition analysis. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 47, 58-71.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.02.012
36. Loi, L. T. I., So, A. S. I., Lo, I. S., & Fong, L. H. N. (2017). Does the quality of tourist shuttles influence revisit intention through
destination image and satisfaction? The case of Macao. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 32, 115-123.
37. Lou, L., Tian, Z., & Koh, J. (2017). Tourist satisfaction enhancement using mobile QR code payment: An empirical investigation.
Sustainability, 9(7), 1186. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071186
38. Lu, L., Chi, C. G., & Liu, Y. (2015). Authenticity, involvement, and image: Evaluating tourist experiences at historic districts. Tourism
management, 50, 85-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.01.026
39. Luo, J. M., Lam, C. F., & Wang, H. (2021). Exploring the relationship between hedonism, tourist experience, and revisit intention in
entertainment destination. Sage Open, 11(4), 21582440211050390.
40. Luo, Y., Lanlung, C., Kim, E., Tang, L. R., & Song, S. M. (2018). Towards quality of life: The effects of the wellness tourism
experience. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 35(4), 410-424. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2017.1358236
41. Luo, Y., Lanlung, C., Kim, E., Tang, L. R., & Song, S. M. (2018). Towards quality of life: The effects of the wellness tourism
experience. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 35(4), 410-424. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2017.1358236
42. MacCallum, Rebort C. (2012). Model specification: Procedures, strategies, and Related Issues. In Structural Equation Modeling:
Concepts, Issues, and Applications. Edited by Rick H. Hoyle. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc., pp. 16–29.
43. Marín-García, A., Gil-Saura, I., Ruiz-Molina, M. E., & Berenguer-Contrí, G. (2021). Sustainability, store equity, and satisfaction: The
moderating effect of gender in retailing. Sustainability, 13(2), 1010. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13021010
44. Moon, S. J. (2021). Investigating beliefs, attitudes, and intentions regarding green restaurant patronage: An application of the extended
theory of planned behavior with moderating effects of gender and age. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 92, 102727.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102727
45. Moreno-González, A. A., León, C. J., & Fernández-Hernández, C. (2020). Health destination image: The influence of public health
management and well-being conditions. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 16(June).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100430
46. Morgan, M., Elbe, J., & De Esteban Curiel, J. (2009). Has the experience economy arrived? The views of destination managers in three
visitor-dependent areas. International Journal of Tourism Research, 11(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.719
47. Mueller, H., & Kaufmann, E. L. (2001). Wellness tourism: Market analysis of a special health tourism segment and implications for the
hotel industry. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 7(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/135676670100700101
48. Nicolaides, A., & Grobler, A. (2017). Spirituality, Wellness tourism and quality of life. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and
Leisure, 6(1), 1-37.
49. Pan, L., Lu, L., & Gursoy, D. (2020). Traveling to a gendered destination: A goal-framed advertising perspective. Journal of Hospitality
& Tourism Research, 44(3), 499-522. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348019899150
50. Petrick, J. F., Morais, D. D., & Norman, W. C. (2001). An examination of the determinants of entertainment vacationers’ intentions to
revisit. Journal of travel research, 40(1), 41-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728750104000106
51. Pizam, A., Neumann, Y., & Reichel, A. (1978). Dimentions of tourist satisfaction with a destination area. Annals of tourism Research,
5(3), 314-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(78)90115-9
Journal of tourism
[Issue 36]
52. Prayag, G., Hosany, S., Muskat, B., & Del Chiappa, G. (2017). Understanding the Relationships between Tourists’ Emotional
Experiences, Perceived Overall Image, Satisfaction, and Intention to Recommend. Journal of Travel Research, 56(1), 41-54.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287515620567
53. Quadri-Felitti, D. L., & Fiore, A. M. (2013). Destination loyalty: Effects of wine tourists’ experiences, memories, and satisfaction on
intentions. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 13(1), 47-62.
54. Quintal, V. A., & Polczynski, A. (2010). Factors influencing tourists' revisit intentions. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics,
22(4), 554-578. https://doi.org/10.1108/13555851011090565
55. Ringle, C., Da Silva, D., & Bido, D. (2015). Structural equation modeling with the SmartPLS. Bido, D., da Silva, D., & Ringle, C.
(2014). Structural Equation Modeling with the Smartpls. Brazilian Journal of Marketing, 13(2).
56. Sandberg, D. (2017). Medical tourism: An emerging global healthcare industry. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 10(4),
1–8.
57. Setiawan, R., & Kurniawan, D. A. (2019). Analisis Tourist Experience Terhadap Revisit Intention pada Objek Wisata Air Panas Se
Kabupaten Garut. Business Innovation and Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(3), 175-180. https://doi.org/10.35899/biej.v1i3.70
58. Sirgy, M. J., Kruger, P. S., Lee, D. J., & Yu, G. B. (2011). How does a travel trip affect tourists’ life satisfaction?. Journal of Travel
research, 50(3), 261-275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287510362784
59. Smith, M., & Kelly, C. (2006). Wellness tourism. Tourism Recreation Research, 31(1), 1–4.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2006.11081241
60. Song, H. J., Lee, C. K., Park, J. A., Hwang, Y. H., & Reisinger, Y. (2015). The influence of tourist experience on perceived value and
satisfaction with temple stays: The experience economy theory. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 32(4), 401-415.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2014.898606
61. Soonsan, N., Sukhabot, S., & Phakdee-Auksorn, P. (2023). Understanding the relationship between gastronomic experience, satisfaction,
and revisit intention. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 44(2), 585-592.
62. Sparks, B. (2007). Planning a wine tourism vacation? Factors that help to predict tourist behavioral intentions. Tourism Management,
28, 1180-1192.
63. Su, L., Cheng, J., & Swanson, S. (2022). The companion effect on adventure tourists’ satisfaction and subjective well-being: The
moderating role of gender. Tourism Review, 77(3), 897-912. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-02-2021-0063
64. Su, L., Huang, S., & Chen, X. (2015). Effects of service fairness and service quality on tourists’ behavioral intentions and subjective
well-being. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 32(3), 290-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2014.896766
65. Travis, J. W., & Ryan, R. S. (2004). Wellness workbook: How to achieve enduring health and vitality. Random House Digital
66. Tung, V. W. S., & Ritchie, J. B. (2011). Exploring the essence of memorable tourism experiences. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(4),
1367–1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2011.03.009
67. Um, S., Chon, K., & Ro, Y. (2006). Antecedents of revisit intention. Annals of Tourism Research, 33, 1141-1158.
68. Wang, K., Xu, H., & Huang, L. (2020). Wellness tourism and spatial stigma: A case study of Bama, China. Tourism Management,
78(June). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.104039
69. Wiese, C. W., Kuykendall, L., & Tay, L. (2018). Get active? A meta-analysis of leisure-time physical activity and subjective well-being.
The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(1), 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2017.1374436
70. Yoon, Y. & Uysal, M. (2005). An examination of the effects of motivation and satisfaction on destination loyalty: a structural model.
Tourism Management, 26(1), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2003.08.016
71. Yu, J. Y., & Ko, T. G. (2012). A cross-cultural study of perceptions of medical tourism among Chinese, Japanese and Korean tourists in
Korea. Tourism Management, 33(1), 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.02.002
72. Zhang, H., Wu, Y., & Buhalis, D. (2018) A model of perceived image, memorable tourism experiences and revisit intention. Journal of
destination marketing & management, 8, 326-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2017.06.004
73. Zhang, H., Yang, Y., Zheng, C., & Zhang, J. (2016). Too dark to revisit? The role of past experiences and intrapersonal constraints.
Tourism Management, 54, 452-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.01.002