Title: The Challenge of Crafting a Thesis on "Thesis Of Watching TV Makes You Smarter"

Crafting a thesis is no easy feat, especially when the topic is as intriguing and thought-provoking as
"Thesis Of Watching TV Makes You Smarter." This subject requires a deep understanding of both
television culture and cognitive development, making it a challenging endeavor for even the most
seasoned researchers and writers.

The complexities of the topic demand a thorough exploration of various perspectives, theories, and
empirical evidence. Balancing the need for credible sources with the innovative thinking required to
present a unique argument can be a daunting task. Additionally, the evolving nature of television and
its impact on cognitive processes adds an extra layer of difficulty to the research process.

Understanding the intricate connections between watching TV and cognitive development involves
delving into neuroscientific research, media studies, and psychology. Navigating through a vast sea
of information while maintaining a coherent and compelling argument requires both time and
expertise.

For those who find themselves overwhelmed by the intricacies of this subject, seeking professional
assistance can be a prudent decision. Helpwriting.net offers a reliable solution for individuals looking
to streamline their thesis-writing process. With a team of experienced writers well-versed in diverse
academic disciplines, the platform provides the necessary support to tackle the challenges posed by a
thesis on "Thesis Of Watching TV Makes You Smarter."

By opting for ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔, individuals can benefit from the expertise of seasoned
researchers and writers who understand the nuances of crafting a thesis. The platform ensures a
meticulous approach to research, analysis, and presentation, guaranteeing a high-quality paper that
meets academic standards.

In conclusion, writing a thesis on "Thesis Of Watching TV Makes You Smarter" is undoubtedly a

complex task that requires expertise and dedication. For those seeking a reliable and efficient
solution, ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ offers the support needed to navigate the challenges of this
intriguing topic.
But AMc’s column raises the important point that too often tv scholars canonize texts on seemingly
subjective bases. Consider the difference between delivering a lecture about the importance of
certain engineering skills, and the ability to teach the same topic using video games to actually build
a structure through a simulation-type computer game. 1 hour! The minimum time our certified writers
need to deliver a 100% original paper Learn More Nevertheless, it is important for parents and
teachers to teach the value of developing time-management skills. Consequently, a new show can be
too much for those that come home exhausted from a full day of work. It contains thousands of
paper examples on a wide variety of topics, all donated by helpful students. In conclusion, the chosen
photo offered a distinct perspective that helped me comprehend Steven's writing. Quantity over
quality is important here — the more plot threads, the more info, the more characters, the more
intensely serial — the more complex and therefore better the text. Furthermore, Steven highlights the
positive effects of participating in TV Turn Off Week, countering any negative notions about it.
Many parents believe that the way they rear their children affects many aspects of their lives, and
they are right. In this context, a propaganda photo found on Facebook serves as a valua. Many
viewers can relate to some of the characters in some way and eventually care for them. In spite of the
fact that Johnson mostly refers to TV shows with many narrative threads as stimulating the cognitive
activities, The Mentalist based on one main narrative line is good to stimulate the intellectual
development because this show is an example of a new type of TV series where the process of
solving mysteries encourages and motivates the audience to think actively while watching TV. Also
shows like Glee gives you another example of the lives of high school students and the conflicts
between them and also how music plays a big role in there school. Because of the thinking that
undergoes during the viewing of a modern television show, Steven believes that television makes
individuals smarter. Not to speak of working professionals, even students are also not untouched by
this feeling. The same thing can be said if one will compare the measurable results of learning a
computer language, so that the student can create software that will in turn help a specific problem in
society. Smart culture is something shared by kids and parents, and television shows can greatly
increase cognitive thinking of children and adults. Nevertheless, The Mentalist differs from other
criminal series because Patrick Jane, a mentalist and consultant in the California Bureau of
Investigation (CBI), tries to find a serial killer known as Red John in all episodes, and more narrative
threads are involved in the basic narrative scheme with each season. This is definitely a factor that
hinders the growth of the digital tv market. She also gave her opinion on the show 24 because she
describes how it portrays Muslims terrorist on that show for example she writes “Wait a minute isn’t
a fictional program’s connection to real-life political events like torture and racial profiling one of the
“social relationships” she feels its wrong to watch stuff that has to do with real life events. It turns
out, it might be just what the doctor ordered. For example, historical drama and drama created about
scientific areas like robotics are now famous. Children and teenagers must set aside time for school
related activities. One cannot just watch one episode and fully understand everything that is
occurring within the television show. It gives us an idea what we are dealing with around the world.
Furthermore, I believe that television shows can also help cognitive development in children.
Johnson argues that watching tv can make people smarter because of its complex plots and rounded
characters force people to focus, to produce inferences, and to understand changing relationships
(279). It proves social intelligence and emotional intelligence are higher. Is there research showing
that consuming a certain kind of narrative makes you smarter. In one study, college students that
completed a draining writing assignment were more likely to watch familiar shows instead of new
ones. The other group watched television documentaries like Shark Week.
She argues that watching television today does not make people smarter; instead, it dulls their
minds. In “Red Queen”, viewers continue to guess who can be Red John, try to solve the puzzle of
the antiques dealer’s murder, focus on the mystery of LaRoche’s personality, and analyze whether
Hightower can work for Red John (“The Mentalist: Red Queen, Season 3, Episode 16”). A scheme
which in an essence hooks viewers into the television shows they watch. Since the introduction of
cable TV in the 1950s, concerns have arisen about excessive television viewing. Indeed, even some
of my television studies colleagues have argued with me about the superiority of texts like Lost or
Alias on the basis of their structural complexity, as if that alone determined their cultural significance.
I believed that this creates lazy individuals who only do whats fun. As Gabriel explains, “Through
the television shows that we watch or the movies or the books that we read, even celebrities that we
read about online, they can give us a sense of connection.”. You can use our samples to gather new
ideas, get inspiration, check out a particular paper's structure, familiarize yourself with a citation
style, or collect resources for research. Also, we can’t forget about the medical dramas to put into this
list. As Allison points out, the masculinist assumptions driving Johnson’s choices of examples
preclude his considering something addressed to a female audience and centered on a “feminine”
theme (children and families). In conclusion, the chosen photo offered a distinct perspective that
helped me comprehend Steven's writing. The image demonstrates that television inhibits imagination
while reading and outdoor exploration promote it. But what about a historical drama with real
historical knowledge. To release this stress, everyone needs some activity. Shira Gabriel, a professor
of psychology at Buffalo University, points out how watching classic feel-good sitcoms gives people
a sense of belonging. “There’s this strong, very old evolutionary system in us that pulls us towards
wanting these comforting narratives,” she says. On the one hand, to follow the puzzle presented
with the help of the reverse narrative is easier than to solve the mystery with many unknowns
because all the clues lead to the known final point. But I wanted to point to two major questions
here. Good TV, according to Johnson, can be described as when, “you focus on the plot, and in
focusing you’re exercising parts of your brain that map social networks, that fill in missing
information, that connect multiple narrative threads,”(292). Not to speak of working professionals,
even students are also not untouched by this feeling. Also, many people dislike long-run informative
history lessons is another fact. CBS It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia (iPhone only) NBC Trendrr.
By contrast, most people need some motivation to clear both psychological and physical fatigue
inherent in human life, in an attempt to stimulate learning and cognitive development. It is also
important to develop time-management skills in order to set aside time for school related activities.
From this point of view, one will be able to develop learning strategies that can harness these
capabilities. However, I also believe that it is making these viewers more helpless at the same time.
Digital Leadership Interview: Jim lawton, Chief Product and Marketing Office. Current reality makes
people to integrate massive amount of various information and this skill could be developed through
TV shows that make its viewers to pay attention, track shifting social relationships and make
inferences (Johnson 170). The same thing can be said if one will compare the measurable results of
learning a computer language, so that the student can create software that will in turn help a specific
problem in society. As a result, participants' brains experience advantages and their imaginations
expand. For example, when watching a documentary a person get to understand many thing and by
seeing the visual pictures on the documentary makes them more alert; hence, acting as a great source
of gathering.
In this context, a propaganda photo found on Facebook serves as a valua. These activities may not
provide the required knowledge needed to build buildings or cure cancer; nonetheless, watching TV
and playing video games can help the child process complex problems, and develop a solution for
them. Many argue that extended exposure to mainstream media not only diminishes our intellect but
also heightens acceptance of violence. It is possible to state that following the narrative lines in “Red
Queen”, viewers try to refer to methods and tricks typically used by Jane when he is solving one
more mystery. The drama group grasped this bit of social intelligence better than the documentary
group. Since the Times piece, the book has become the media darling of many in the liberal media
establishment, which has run feature stories and positive reviews of Johnson’s “provocative” and
even “brilliant” thesis: that television is valuable because of the “cognitive workout” its formal
complexities offer the viewer. TV dramas are often engaging, compelling, exciting, gripping,
engrossing, emotionally wrenching, devastating, and in the case of this season’s VERONICA
MARS, exhilarating. Because Johnson’s “smart” television privileges the individual over the
community, he never suggests the ways in which emotional or social awareness might also be
valuable because it offers insight into other people, ways to build community, to bridge difference,
and to create mutual understanding. There is always more that one plot or story going on at a time,
and the audience has to keep the “web” straight to follow the show. In the end, television has
evolved into devise which constantly makes its viewers think. Steven Johnson analyzes this shift
within television in his article “Watching TV Makes You Smarter.” Steven believes that the “constant
thinking” that these television shows require makes viewers smarter. ABC Player Fox News for Ipad
MTVWatchWith TLC Network (iPhone only). Not only that they can develop their point of view.
The same thing can be said if one will compare the measurable results of learning a computer
language, so that the student can create software that will in turn help a specific problem in society.
Innovative, challenging streamed.docx ? HBO’s Game of Thrones. BP Aims are prepared
harmonizing to SMART ( Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, and Timed ).That means it
should be peculiar about what we are traveling to accomplish and should quantify about the aims.
From this perspective, such popular TV series and criminal dramas as The Mentalist can be
considered to be a good alternative to reading a detective story in order to train mental abilities.
There are a several types of aims that all can be done in the SMART format. Powered by CiteTotal,
easy essay citation generator. Not to speak of working professionals, even students are also not
untouched by this feeling. How there are many teen moms and the struggles they go through
especially if they are single parents. Stevens further goes on to explain that 24 represents a TV show
that tests the cognitive abilities of its audience with complex storylines and abundant information, all
while discouraging them from critically examining the vigilante ethics it presents. Changes scenes
and using good information make the show worth watching. One game addict unashamedly revealed
spending seven hours playing a video game, and missed an important historical event that he could
have witnessed if he had the discipline to turn off his Xbox 360 (Bissell 3). So, grab the remote and
get a dose of feel-good medicine when you rewatch beloved shows from days of yore. According to
Johnson, can be described as when, “you focus on the plot, and in focusing you’re exercising parts of
your brain that map social networks, that fill in missing information that connect multiple narrative
threads” (292). It seems like nothing more than a subjective taste distinction, with no basis in
cognitive strategies employed in each. Where is this trend of scholarship that explores cognitive
activities, formal elements, or even evaluative criticism that Allison refers to. Viewers may be getting
smarter, but they don't realize it. Mar, a professor of psychology at York University and co-author of
the study.
In another study, 33% of viewers reported that watching a show or movie inspired them to seriously
consider leaving a relationship. The two mind-sets (according to Carol Dweck who wrote an article
on “The Secret To Raising Smart Kids”) can change the way your child learns. This show also causes
people to exercise their brains and think critically. As a result, watching TV, persons can stimulate
their brain activity and become smarter. As a teenager, Janie watches a bee pollinating a flower on a
pear tree. Also shows like Glee gives you another example of the lives of high school students and
the conflicts between them and also how music plays a big role in there school. But, ultimately, such
an approach seems to me to undermine the original purpose of popular culture studies: to pay
attention to that which is not deemed “good for you” in order to validate and better understand the
social lives of non-elites. Consider for instance the insight cited earlier, about the ability of TV shows
and video games to mimic the mental exercise provided by reading a book. Shira Gabriel, a
professor of psychology at Buffalo University, points out how watching classic feel-good sitcoms
gives people a sense of belonging. “There’s this strong, very old evolutionary system in us that pulls
us towards wanting these comforting narratives,” she says. Instead, we find ourselves with yet
another argument as to why The Sopranos is the best show in television history (and do we really
need another one?) Far from breaking new ground with his analysis, Johnson’s argument replicates
and reinforces existing social hierarchies in television discourse by providing yet another method
with which to validate an elitist, masculinist, capitalist view of what is valuable about the box and
its audience. It proves social intelligence and emotional intelligence are higher. According to
Johnson, “attention, patience, retention, the parsing of narrative threads” are not only results of
reading but also the results of working with multiple narrative lines in TV shows (Johnson 172). One
element the Jonson reports as his primary elements is “multiple threading” as the most celebrated
structural feature of modern television drama” (289). Hare Krushna, Nusrat Mohammad, Susmita
Mundhe, Prof. If the modern viewer selects shows that does not stimulate your brain then that show
is not making you think and not having to think is boring. Steven Johnson speaks of the merits of
watching tv and the way media and entertainment have evolved for an audience and culture that has
become cognitively and intellectually more demanding. The study found that viewers reported good
feelings of being in other people’s company but without being subjected to rejection or the hassle of
scheduling an in-person interaction. “They are there whenever we need them, whenever we ask,”
says Raymond A. The modern audience often chooses the pleasure of solving puzzles, and The
Mentalist provides the viewers with such an opportunity in each episode. The study suggests that
“film narratives, as well as written narratives, may facilitate the understanding of others’ minds,”
because they involve complex plots and nuanced characters. This idea is supported by Johnson, who
discusses multiple narrative lines as the key to stimulate the brain activities. It is not prudent for
parents and teachers to give children and teenagers unbridled freedom to choose what to watch and
play. Current reality makes people to integrate massive amount of various information and this skill
could be developed through TV shows that make its viewers to pay attention, track shifting social
relationships and make inferences (Johnson 170). The image demonstrates that television inhibits
imagination while reading and outdoor exploration promote it. The viewers pay attention to this
characterization provided by Jane because they are used to focusing on Jane’s words. The industry is
paying attention to real social, political, and many engaging issues in society. After all, if we’re going
to utilize an approach that removes the industrial, generic, historical and political context of
television programs to focus on formal elements, shouldn’t that make possible a new kind of textual
adultery that would question or at least expose our assumptions about television quality. Teaching
your child to have the right mind-set for success is crucial to helping your child succeed. I agree with
Steven when he says “modern television makes its viewers smarter”. In light of this, simple
television programs with a higher level of predictability may have a higher degree of improving the
IQ of the viewers. Science Most Recent Molly Sanchez Molly Sanchez Molly Sanchez is a writer,
comedian and lover of burritos everywhere.
Mar, a professor of psychology at York University and co-author of the study. She also gave her
opinion on the show 24 because she describes how it portrays Muslims terrorist on that show for
example she writes “Wait a minute isn’t a fictional program’s connection to real-life political events
like torture and racial profiling one of the “social relationships” she feels its wrong to watch stuff
that has to do with real life events. According to the writer, refraining from television for a week
does not lower intelligence but rather enhances it. In contrast to Johnson's article, Stevens also
discusses television shows that enhance brain function through viewer engagement in paying
attention, making inferences, and understanding intricate character relationships. He also uses dialogs
to explain for example he used dialogs from the show ER to break down what’s happening between
the characters, what words and sentences there using. Many argue that extended exposure to
mainstream media not only diminishes our intellect but also heightens acceptance of violence. We
will write a custom essay on your topic a custom Article Review on “Watching TV Makes You
Smarter” by Steven Johnson 808 writers online Learn More However, Johnson’s choice of mentally
stimulating TV shows is rather limited because he concentrates on popular TV series with many
narrative threads important to be followed by the audience. This thinking has made these shows
more entertaining for individuals to watch. Each paragraph in the body of the essay should contain.
Their Eyes were Watching God by Zora Neale Hurston follows the life of Janie Crawford, an
African American woman of black and white heritage, as she describes it to her best friend, Pheoby
Watson, in the all-black town of Eatonville, Florida. The pattern of watching too much television
starts young, with as many as two-thirds of infants and toddlers watching an average of two hours
of T. But what about a historical drama with real historical knowledge. If you stay on our website, it
means that you agree to our. In the end, television has evolved into devise which constantly makes
its viewers think. It contains thousands of paper examples on a wide variety of topics, all donated by
helpful students. In spite of the fact that Johnson mostly refers to TV shows with many narrative
threads as stimulating the cognitive activities, The Mentalist based on one main narrative line is good
to stimulate the intellectual development because this show is an example of a new type of TV series
where the process of solving mysteries encourages and motivates the audience to think actively while
watching TV. Conclusion The idea that TV shows and video games are detrimental to a child’s
cognitive development is no longer one hundred percent accurate. Modern television is creating a
lazy society which only thinks in situations that individuals deem entertaining. What I really liked
about Allison’s article was the way it identifies how Johnson justifies a cultural hierarchy through the
alibi of his cognitive-improvement argument. For example, the “Baby Einstein” videos promise
intellectual benefits to children from watching a series of images of toys set to classical music. So
then the instant question that comes into your mind should be what should I watch to get smarter.
Since the Times piece, the book has become the media darling of many in the liberal media
establishment, which has run feature stories and positive reviews of Johnson’s “provocative” and
even “brilliant” thesis: that television is valuable because of the “cognitive workout” its formal
complexities offer the viewer. According to Stevens, adults should be mindful of their TV
consumption just like knowing their alcohol limit at a bar. New York: Random House, 2010. Print.
Johnson, Steve. Watching TV Makes You Smarter. Learning the Discipline of Time Management The
benefits of using the TV set and video games to deliver age-appropriate content have become more
evident. TV Turnoff Week is a nationwide event aimed at promoting disconnection from screens and
embracing life. Discover other positive effects of watching TV on the Vidgo blog The Stream such
as The Surprising Brain Benefits of Subtitles. TV dramas are often engaging, compelling, exciting,
gripping, engrossing, emotionally wrenching, devastating, and in the case of this season’s
VERONICA MARS, exhilarating. BP Aims are prepared harmonizing to SMART ( Specific,
Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, and Timed ).That means it should be peculiar about what we are
traveling to accomplish and should quantify about the aims. Johnson's claim is that the fact that
trained viewers can distinguish among twelve distinct plotlines in shows like The Sopranos is
evidence enough to prove how watching tv help people develop their intellectual abilities.
Current reality makes people to integrate massive amount of various information and this skill could
be developed through TV shows that make its viewers to pay attention, track shifting social
relationships and make inferences (Johnson 170). Hence some can suggest the ability of
understanding complex concepts after watching some shows. Adolescents can also learn about social
issues by watching Teen Mom, Switch at Birth and Glee. But such evidence doesn’t fit into an
argument about “smart” tv which depends on the evolution of “complex” texts worthy of being
decoded at length. Over the last half-century, programming on TV has increased the demand it
places on precisely these mental faculties” (Johnson 172). Stevens further goes on to explain that 24
represents a TV show that tests the cognitive abilities of its audience with complex storylines and
abundant information, all while discouraging them from critically examining the vigilante ethics it
presents. It is the use of images and interactive technologies that engages different aspects of
acquiring problem solving skills. I would guess that the cognitive demands on soap viewers are
greater than those of PT shows: more characters, more interconnection among them, longer story
arcs, more relevant backstory, and much, much more narrative to keep track of. These multiple levels
of mental embedding demand that we keep track of many different characters’ knowledge in relation
to the others’ knowledge. Shows like the News, CSI, Law and Order, and Dexter mostly geared
toward adults. The scholarship I see dealing with programming (i.e. not focused primarily upon
technological, industrial, or reception issues) is nearly all interpretive analysis of cultural
representation. In fact, owing to the general spectator roles in television viewers, their inability to
take charge of the unfolding events in the programs does not have any impact on their respective
intelligence quotients (IQs). It proves social intelligence and emotional intelligence are higher. You
can use it for research and reference purposes to write your own paper. I believe Johnson’s article
was only intended as a provocative think piece, a good (but flawed) beginning. Creators of modern
television have created a scheme. It gives us in idea what where dealing with around the world.
Baby Einstein, obviously, will not produce another Einstein. (For more on this I recommend Steven
Pinker’s THE BLANK SLATE and Judith Rich Harris’s THE NURTURE ASSUMPTION).
Debating the definitions of “intelligence” and “success” is a must, but the world defines these terms
day-to-day out of necessity. Shira Gabriel, a professor of psychology at Buffalo University, points
out how watching classic feel-good sitcoms gives people a sense of belonging. “There’s this strong,
very old evolutionary system in us that pulls us towards wanting these comforting narratives,” she
says. And let us not forget about the children that between Caillou, Dora the Explorer, and PBS
shows are all educational for them. It requires a minimum of supervision and ensures that there will
be relatively quiet while they are watching. Indeed, even some of my television studies colleagues
have argued with me about the superiority of texts like Lost or Alias on the basis of their structural
complexity, as if that alone determined their cultural significance. Children and adolescents need to
be exposed to television good or bad the choice is theirs, because it will help them learn about social
issues as they go through life. There are two kinds of programming that, according to the logic of
Johnson’s argument, should also be good for the brain. The same thing can be said if one will
compare the measurable results of learning a computer language, so that the student can create
software that will in turn help a specific problem in society. Because Johnson’s “smart” television
privileges the individual over the community, he never suggests the ways in which emotional or
social awareness might also be valuable because it offers insight into other people, ways to build
community, to bridge difference, and to create mutual understanding. The image demonstrates that
television inhibits imagination while reading and outdoor exploration promote it. According to the
many experts in the field, this is a good brain exercise. Good TV shows like 24, Survivor, The
Sopranos, Alias, Lost, The Simpson, E.R., the opposite approach.