PP Module 2 Dec19 Ns
PP Module 2 Dec19 Ns
PROFESSIONAL PROGRAMME
(New Syllabus)
DECEMBER 2019
MODULE 2
ICSI House, 22, Institutional Area, Lodi Road, New Delhi 110 003
Phones : 41504444, 45341000; Fax : 011-24626727
These answers have been written by competent persons
and the Institute hope that the GUIDELINE ANSWERS will
assist the students in preparing for the Institute's
examinations. It is, however, to be noted that the answers
are to be treated as model answers and not as exhaustive
and the Institute is not in any way responsible for the
correctness or otherwise of the answers compiled and
published herein.
C O N T E N T S
Page
MODULE 2
.
1 PP–SACM&DD–December 2019
PROFESSIONAL PROGRAMME EXAMINATION
DECEMBER 2019
6.1 Proof of sending Notice of the meetings of the Board / Committee and
General meetings and its delivery
6.2 Proof of sending Agenda and Notes on Agenda and their delivery
Question 2A
Answer 2(a)
Provisions of section 139 (2) of the Companies Act 2013 and Rule 5 of the Companies
(Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, as amended, deals with applicability of mandatory
term / rotation in the appointment of auditor and the said provision is applicable to the
following class of companies:
(a) All unlisted public companies having paid up share capital of Rupees 10 crore or
more;
(b) All private limited companies having paid up share capital of Rupees 50 crore or
more;
(c) All companies having paid up share capital below the threshold limit mentioned
in (a) and (b) above but having public borrowings from financial institutions, banks
or public deposits of 50 crore or more.
Accordingly, Zen Pvt. Limited will get be covered as per provision (c) above and
therefore, it is mandatorily required to rotate the Auditor as per the provisions of Section
139 (2) of the Companies Act, 2013.
Answer 2(b)
C- KYC stands for Central KYC which provide the uniform norms and inter-usability.
The central KYC registry across all financial sectors has been set up as a depository for
KYC records. This new process, without asking customers to provide multiple KYC
undertakings will help banks, mutual funds, brokerage firms and depository participants
offer services. After complying with the new CKYC norms, a unified customer identification
code is generated, and which is used whenever KYC is required. This initiative has been
started for the purpose of centralising and streamlining KYC process and also to avoid
the duplication of KYC and less scope of forgery. The government has authorised the
Central Registry of Securitization Asset Reconstruction and Security Interest of India
(CERSAI) for performing the functions of Central KYC Records Registry (CKYCR), also
the duty of receiving the details and safely storing them and retrieving the KYC records in
the digital form of a 'client'.
Social audit is a process of reviewing official records and determining whether the
reported expenditures reflect the actual money spent on the ground. A social audit is a
formal review of a company’s endeavours in social responsibility.
The key difference between development and social audit is that a social audit focuses
on the neglected issue of social impacts/ while a development audit has a broader focus
including environment and economic issues/ such as the efficiency of a project or programme.
Takeover audit : To provide the desired results to an investor and to ensure that the
acquisition is executed in the most effective manner, the concept of the takeover audit
has been evolved; the takeover audit provides a cost benefit analysis to suggest a strategic
plan for the long term investment strategy. The audit provides for the Acquisition Audit as
well as the inter-se Transfer performed by the acquirer.
Answer 3(b)
A public company may issue securities to public through prospectus Public offer by
complying with the provisions of Part I of chapter III Prospectus and Allotment of Securities;
or through private placement by complying with the provisions of Part II of chapter III –
Prospectus and Allotment of Securities; or through a rights issue or a bonus issue in
accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 (‘the Act’) and in case of a
listed company or a company which intends to get its securities listed also with the
provisions of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act,1992 and the rules and
regulations made thereunder, the key regulation governing the issue of securities and
preparation of financial information are
5. The auditors may also require the following records of the transferor company for
examination:
6. Books of account and relevant records for the last five years.
Answer 6(b)
As defined by the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA), Internal auditing is an independent,
objective assurance and consulting activity designed to add value and improve an
organization’s operations. It helps an organization to accomplish its objectives by bringing
a systematic, disciplined approach to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of risk
management, control and governance processes.
Independence is established by the organizational and reporting structure. Objectivity
is achieved by an appropriate mind-set. The internal audit activity evaluates risk exposures
27 PP–SACM&DD–December 2019
relating to the organization’s governance, operations and information systems, in relation
to:
1. Effectiveness and efficiency of operations.
2. Reliability and integrity of financial and operational information.
3. Safeguarding of assets.
4. Compliance with laws, regulations, and contracts.
Based on the results of the risk assessment, the internal auditors evaluate the
adequacy and effectiveness of how risks are identified and managed in the above areas.
They also assess other aspects such as ethics and values within the organization,
performance management, communication of risk and control information within the
organization in order to facilitate a good governance process. An effective internal audit
activity is a valuable resource for management and the board and the audit committee
due to its understanding of the organization and its culture, operations, and risk profile.
The objectivity, skills, and knowledge of competent internal auditors can significantly
add value to an organization’s internal control, risk management, and governance
processes. Similarly an effective internal audit activity can provide assurance to other
stakeholders such as regulators, employees, providers of finance, and shareholders.
As per the IIA, core principles of Internal Audit hovers around the performance of
effective internal auditing and all of them must be present and working well. How an
internal auditor, as well as an internal audit function, demonstrate achievement of the
core principles may be quite different from organisation-toorganisation. But, failure to
achieve any of the core principles implies that an internal audit activity is not as effective
as it could be in achieving internal audit’s mission. Core principles of internal audit are:
1. Demonstrates integrity.
2. Demonstrates competence and due professional care.
3. Independent and objective exercise.
4. Aligns with the strategies, objectives, and risks of the organisation.
5. Is appropriately positioned and adequately resourced.
6. Demonstrates quality and continuous improvement.
7. Communicates effectively.
8. Provides risk-based assurance.
9. Insightful, proactive, and future-focused.
10. Promotes organisational improvement.
Answer 6(c)
Audit Trail is a repository of administrative and operational documentation relating to
audit process. It is established and maintained to aid in audit planning and to centralize
available documentation and information not included in the individual audit files. Information
included in the permanent files should only be information that cannot be feasibly included
PP–SACM&DD–December 2019 28
in the working papers due to volume or format or because the information will be applicable
on an on going basis to the current audit or future audits. Permanent files should be filed
with all audit and follow-up working papers supporting the audit. The contents of permanent
files are dependent on the needs of the audit. An index should be developed and placed
in the front of the permanent file indicating the documents contained, date included in file
and auditor’s initials.
The auditor should prepare and maintain working papers, the form and content of
which should be designed to meet the circumstances of a particular engagement. The
information contained in working papers constitutes the principal record of the work that
the auditor has done and the conclusions that he has reached concerning significant
matters. Working papers serve mainly to -
1. Provide the principal support for the auditor's report, including his representation
regarding observance of the standards of field work, which is implicit in the
reference in his report to generally, accepted auditing standards.
2. Aid the auditor in the conduct and supervision of the audit.
Working papers are records kept by the auditor of the procedures applied, the
tests performed, the information obtained, and the pertinent conclusions reached
in the engagement. Examples of working papers are audit programs, analyses,
memoranda, letters of confirmation and representation, abstracts of company
documents, and schedules or commentaries prepared or obtained by the auditor.
Working papers also may be in the form of data stored on tapes, films, or other
media.
The quantity, type, and content of working papers vary with the circumstances, but
they should be sufficient to show that the records agree or reconcile with the statements
or other information reported on and that the applicable standards of field work have
been observed.
Working papers ordinarily should include documentation showing that-
- The work has been adequately planned and supervised, indicating observance
of the first standard of field work.
- A sufficient understanding of internal control has been obtained to plan the audit
and to determine the nature, timing, and extent of tests to be performed.
- The audit evidence obtained, the auditing procedures applied, and the testing
performed have provided sufficient competent evidential matter to afford a
reasonable basis for an opinion, indicating observance of the third standard of
field work.
Working papers are the property of the auditor. The auditor's rights of ownership,
however, are subject to ethical limitations relating to the confidential relationship with
clients.
The auditor's working papers may sometimes serve as a useful reference source for
his client, but the working papers should not be regarded as a part of, or a substitute for,
the client's accounting or other records.
29 PP–SACM&DD–December 2019
The auditor should adopt reasonable procedures for safe custody of his working
papers and should retain them for a period sufficient to meet the needs of his practice
and to satisfy any pertinent legal requirements of records retention.
Audit working papers provide evidence of audit coverage and documentation of audit
trails, they should be properly filed and stored. In addition, there should be a standardized
format for working papers, adequate cross-referencing to identify the audit working papers
created as well as a system for filing and retrieving working papers.
Answer 6A(i)
(a) Fraud V/S Non Compliance
Fraud : As defined in Explanation to Section 447 of the Companies Act, 2013, the
“fraud” in relation to affairs of a company or anybody corporate, includes any act,
omission, concealment of any fact or abuse of position committed by any person or
any other person with the connivance in any manner, with intent to deceive, to gain
undue advantage from, or to injure the interests of, the company or its shareholders
or its creditors or any other person, whether or not there is any wrongful gain or
wrongful loss.
In general the fraud can be defined as act or course of deception, an intentional
concealment, omission, or perversion of truth, to
(1) gain unlawful or unfair advantage,
(2) induce another to part with some valuable item or surrender a legal right, or
(3) inflict injury in some manner.
Willful fraud is a criminal offense which calls for severe penalties, and its prosecution
and punishment. However, incompetence or negligence in managing a business or
even a reckless waste of firm's assets (for example by speculating on the stock
market) does not normally constitute a fraud.
Non Compliance : The term non-compliance refers to failure to comply with the laws,
rules regulations etc. It is commonly used in regard to a failure to meet the compliance
requirements or failure to doing compliance be it the failure in following procedures,
filing of information, eligibility conditions, reporting etc.
The relationship between the Fraud and the non-compliance can be constructed as
the non- compliance in the company may lead to a fraud however it may also be
noted that the fraud can also be made in the compliant company.
(b) Key Differences between Ethics and Values
The fundamental differences between ethics and value are described in the given
below points:
- Ethics refers to the guidelines for conduct, that address question about morality.
Value is defined as the principles and ideals, which helps them in making the
judgement of what is more important.
- Ethics is a system of moral principles. In contrast to values, which is the stimuli
of our thinking.
PP–SACM&DD–December 2019 30
- Values strongly influence the emotional state of mind. Therefore, it acts as a
motivator. On the other hand, ethics compels to follow a particular course of
action.
- Ethics are consistent, whereas values are different for different persons i.e. what
is important for one person may not be important for another person.
- Values tell us what we want to do or achieve in our life, whereas ethics helps us
in deciding what is morally correct or incorrect in the given situation.
- Ethics determines to what extent our options are right or wrong. As opposed to
values, which defines our priorities for life.
To summaries ethics are consistently applied over the period and remains same for
all the human beings. Values have an individualistic approach, i.e. it varies from person
to person but remains stable relatively unchanging, but they can be changed over time
due to a significant emotional event.
Answer 6A(ii)
Section 448 of Companies Act 2013 deals with penalty for false statements. The
section provides that if in any return, report certificate, financial statement, prospectus,
statement or other document required by, or for, the purposes of any of the provisions of
this Act or the rules made thereunder, any person makes a statement-
(a) which is false in any material particulars, knowing it to be false; or
(b) which omits any material fact, knowing it to be material, he shall be liable under
section 447.
Penalty for incorrect Secretarial Audit Report
Section 447 deals with punishment for fraud which provides that any person who is
found to be guilty of fraud, involving an amount of at least ten lakh rupees or one percent
of the turnover of the company, whichever is lower shall be punishable with imprisonment
for a term which shall not be less than six months but which may extend to ten years
and shall also be liable to fine which shall not be less than the amount involved in the
fraud, but which may extend to three times the amount involved in the fraud. In case, the
fraud in question involves public interest, the term of imprisonment shall not be less than
three years.
In case where the fraud involves an amount less than ten lakh rupees or one per
cent. of the turnover of the company, whichever is lower, and does not involve public
interest, any person guilty of such fraud shall be punishable with imprisonment for a
term which may extend to five years or with fine which may extend to Fifty lakh rupees
or with both.
In view of this, a company secretary in practice will be attracting the penal provisions
of section 448, for any false statement in any material particular or omission of any
material fact in the Secretarial Audit Report. However, a person will be penalised under
section 448 in case he makes a statement, which is false in any material particular,
knowing it to be false, or which omits any material fact knowing it to be material.
It is pertinent to note that section 448 applies to "any person". In view of this, a
31 PP–SACM&DD–December 2019
company secretary in practice, who is an independent professional, will be attracting the
penalty, as prescribed in section 448 in case his observations in the secretarial audit
report turns out to be false or he omits any material fact, knowing it to be false or
material.
Answer 6A(iii)
If a listed entity is non-compliant with the provisions of the Listing Regulations as per
the criteria specified below, the concerned recognized stock exchange(s) shall suspend
trading in the shares of such listed entity by following procedure prescribed in the SEBI
Circular No. SEBI/HO/CFD/ CMD/CIR/P/2018/77 dated May 3, 2018.
Criteria for suspension of the trading in the shares of the listed entities are as under:
a) Failure to comply with regulation 17(1) with respect to board composition including
appointment of woman director for two consecutive quarters;
b) Failure to comply with regulation 18(1) with respect to constitution of audit
committee for two consecutive quarters;
c) Failure to comply with regulation 27(2) with respect to submission of corporate
governance compliance report for two consecutive quarters;
d) Failure to comply with regulation 31 with respect to submission of shareholding
pattern for two consecutive quarters;
e) Failure to comply with regulation 33 with respect to submission of financial
results for two consecutive quarters;
f) Failure to comply with regulation 34 with respect to submission of annual report
for two consecutive financial years;
g) Failure to submit information on the reconciliation of shares and capital audit
report for two consecutive quarters;
h) Receipt of the notice of suspension of trading of that entity by any other recognized
stock exchange on any or all of the above grounds.
***
PP–CRIL&W–December 2019 32
PART – I
Question 1
(a) Elucidate the requirement of registration of offer of schemes involving transfer
of shares under the Companies Act, 2013.
(b) The accounting treatment of Mergers and Acquisitions has undergone a drastic
change with the introduction of IND-AS 103 — Business Combination. Comment.
(c) It is generally accepted that all mergers and acquisitions have one common
goal regardless of their category or structure. Give your opinion indicating the
benefits that companies can derive upon by merging.
(d) Draft a checklist for a transferee company in the process of Takeover.
(5 marks each)
Answer 1(a)
Mode of registration of offer of schemes or contract involving the transfer of shares
are provided under section 238 (1) of the Companies Act, 2013 (the Act). It states that
in relation to every offer of a scheme or contract involving the transfer of shares or any
class of shares in the transferor company to the transferee company under section 235
of the Act, - (a) every circular containing such offer and recommendation to the members
of the transferor company by its directors to accept such offer shall be accompanied by
such information and in such manner as may be prescribed; (b) every such offer shall
contain a statement by or on behalf of the transferee company, disclosing the steps it
has taken to ensure that necessary cash will be available; and (c) every such circular
shall be presented to the Registrar for registration and no such circular shall be issued
until it is so registered:
Provided that the Registrar may refuse, for reasons to be recorded in writing, to
register any such circular which does not contain the information required to be given
under clause (a) or which sets out such information in a manner likely to give a
false impression, and communicate such refusal to the parties within thirty days of
the application.
Section 238(2) of the Act states that an appeal shall lie to the Tribunal against an
order of the Registrar refusing to register any circular under sub-section (1) of section
238 of the Act.
Section 238(3) of the Act states that the director who issues a circular which has
32
33 PP–CRIL&W–December 2019
not been presented for registration and registered under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of
section 238 of the Act, shall be liable to a penalty of one lakh rupees.
Answer 1(b)
Accounting treatment of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) have undergone a drastic
change with the introduction of IND AS-103 - Business Combination and Companies
Act, 2013. Section 232 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that accounting treatment
prescribed in the court approved scheme for merger, demerger, amalgamation or group
restructuring should be in accordance with the accounting standards prescribed under
section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Certain other developments in M&A accounting are as under:
(a) Method of Accounting for business combination
Under AS-14 many companies were able to account for business combination
between commonly controlled enterprises using purchase method. As a result
of this, tax benefit for goodwill amortisation was available while computing book
profit for MAT purpose.
Under IND AS-103 it is mandatory to use pooling of interests method for business
combination between commonly controlled enterprises. As a result of this
accounting alternatives gets restricted and the consequent tax benefits will also
be not available.
(b) Appointed date v. Effective date
In court approved merger, demerger and other restructuring accounting was
done from the appointed date once the court order became effective. However,
with the implementation of IND AS-103 Business combinations this is going to
change. As per IND AS-103 accounting for business combination should be
done on the date on which the acquirer obtains control.
(c) Accounting for goodwill
AS-14 provided an accounting choice to compute the goodwill at the fair value
of the assets taken over or at the net asset value of the assets taken over.
However, this choice is not available in IND AS-103, as the value of goodwill
has to be computed using the fair value of the net assets taken over.
AS-14 provides for amortisation of goodwill over a period of five years. IND AS-
103 prohibits amortisation of goodwill and is required to test goodwill for
impairment annually. This will result in a volatile profit and loss account.
Goodwill amortisation was available as tax deductible item while computing MAT
liability. This is not available in the IND-AS regime.
Answer 1(c)
All mergers and acquisitions have one common goal to create synergy that makes
the value of the combined companies greater than the sum of the two parts. Synergy
may be in the form of revenue enhancement and cost savings. By merging, the companies
hope to benefit from the following:
• Bigger size : Many companies use M&A to grow in size and leapfrog their rivals.
PP–CRIL&W–December 2019 34
While it can take years or decades to double the size of a company through
organic growth, this can be achieved much more rapidly through inorganic growth,
i.e., mergers or acquisitions.
• Preempted competition : This is a very powerful motivation for mergers and
acquisitions, and is the primary reason why M&A activity occurs in distinct
cycles.
• Domination : Companies also engage in M&A to become a dominant player or
market leader in their respective sector or industry. However, since a combination
of two behemoths would result in a potential monopoly, such a transaction
would come under purview of regulatory authorities.
• Tax benefits : Companies also use M&A for tax purposes, although this may be
an implicit rather than an explicit motive.
• Economies of scale : Mergers also translate into improved economies of scale
which refers to reduced costs per unit that arise from increase in total output of
a product.
• Acquiring new technology : To stay competitive, companies need to stay on top
of technological developments and their business applications. By buying a
smaller company with unique technologies, a large company can maintain or
develop a competitive edge.
• Increase in market share : Merger aids in increasing the market share of the
merged company. This rise in the market share is achieved by providing an
adequate supply of goods & services as needed by clients. Entering into an
agreement with clients for continuous supply of goods and services.
Answer 1(d)
Check-list for a transferee company in the takeover process is given as under:
1. Minutes of Board meeting containing consideration and approval of the offer
sent to the transferor company.
2. Offer of a scheme or contract sent to the transferor company.
3. Notice to dissenting shareholders if any, of the transferor company.
4. Notice to the remaining shareholders of the transferor company, who have not
assented to the proposed acquisition, if any.
5. Form No: CAA 14 received from the transferor company, which has been circulated
to its members by that company.
6. Minutes of general meeting of the company containing approval of the
shareholders to the offer of scheme or contract sent to the transferor company.
7. Court order, if any.
8. Register of Investments.
9. Duly filled in and executed instrument(s) of transfer for shares held by the
dissenting shareholders.
10. Balance Sheets showing investments in the shares of the transferor company.
35 PP–CRIL&W–December 2019
Attempt all parts of either Q. No. 2 or Q. No. 2A
Question 2
(a) Discuss the provision relating to appeal by a person aggrieved by the orders of
National Company Law Tribunal. (5 marks)
(b) Differentiate between Inbound merger and Outbound merger. What are the laws
governing Cross-border mergers in India ? (5 marks)
(c) XYZ Ltd. is a company listed on the National Stock Exchange. The latest audited
financial position of XYZ Ltd. is as under :
(Amount in ` crore)
Paid up equity capital 442
Free Reserves 20,347
Total secured and unsecured debts 1,275
The company intends to buy-back its fully paid up equity shares of `5 each not
exceeding 20,585,000 equity shares at `950 per equity share payable in cash for
aggregate consideration not exceeding `1,955.57 crore.
Examine whether the above buy-back offer through tender route can be approved by
the Board of Directors, keeping in view the provisions of the relevant SEBI Regulations
and Companies Act, 2013. (5 marks)
OR (Alternate question to Q. No. 2)
Question 2A
(i) What is the entitlement of dissenting shareholders in case of amalgamation
between banking companies ? What are the information and documents required
to be submitted by the banking companies to the Reserve Bank of India for
determination of the value of shares by the Reserve Bank of India ? (5 marks)
(ii) “A business valuation involves logical application/analysis of historical/future
tangible and intangible attributes of business”. Do you agree with this statement?
What are the aspects involved in the preliminary study of valuation ? (5 marks)
(iii) You are the Company Secretary of PQR Ltd. The Board of the company is
opting for reduction in the share capital of the company without seeking the
approval of the Tribunal. How would you advise the Board ? (5 marks)
Answer 2(a)
Provisions relating to appeal from orders of Tribunal given in section 421 of the
Companies Act, 2013 are as under:
(1) Any person aggrieved by an order of the Tribunal (NCLT) may prefer an appeal
to the Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT).
(2) No appeal shall lie to the Appellate Tribunal from an order made by the Tribunal
with the consent of parties.
PP–CRIL&W–December 2019 36
(3) Every appeal under sub-section (1) of section 421 shall be filed within a period
of forty-five days from the date on which a copy of the order of the Tribunal is
made available to the person aggrieved and shall be in such form, and
accompanied by such fees, as may be prescribed:
Provided that the Appellate Tribunal may entertain an appeal after the expiry of
the said period of forty-five days from the date aforesaid, but within a further
period not exceeding forty-five days, if it is satisfied that the appellant was
prevented by sufficient cause from filing the appeal within that period.
(4) On the receipt of an appeal under sub-section (1) of section 421, the Appellate
Tribunal shall, after giving the parties to the appeal a reasonable opportunity of
being heard, pass such orders thereon as it thinks fit, confirming, modifying or
setting aside the order appealed against.
(5) The Appellate Tribunal shall send a copy of every order made by it to the Tribunal
and the parties to appeal.
Answer 2(b)
An inbound merger is one where a foreign company merges with an Indian company
resulting in an Indian company being formed. An outbound merger is one where an
Indian company merges with a foreign company resulting in a foreign company being
formed.
The following Acts/laws govern cross border mergers in India:
1. Companies Act, 2013
2. SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011
3. Foreign Exchange Management (Cross Border Merger) Regulations, 2018
4. Competition Act, 2002
5. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
6. Income Tax Act, 1961
7. Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT)
8. Transfer of Property Act, 1882
9. Indian Stamp Act, 1899
10. Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA)
11. IFRS 3 Business Combinations
Answer 2(c)
Quantum of Buy-back (Section 68 of the Companies Act, 2013)
(a) Board of directors can approve buy-back up to 10% of the total paid-up equity
capital and free reserves of the company and such buy-back has to be authorized
by the board by means of a resolution passed at the meeting.
37 PP–CRIL&W–December 2019
(b) Shareholders by a special resolution can approve buy-back up to 25% of the
total paid-up capital and free reserves of the company. In respect of any financial
year, the shareholders can approve by special resolution up to 25% of total
equity capital in that year.
The ratio of the aggregate of secured and unsecured debts owed by the company
after buy-back should not be more than twice the paid-up capital and its free reserves
i.e. the ratio shall not exceed 2:1.
In the instant case, since the paid-up equity capital and free reserves is Rs.20,789
crore as per the latest audited financials, the Board can authorize through a resolution
passed at its meeting the buy-back of shares totaling Rs.1,955.57 crore, which is less
than the prescribed 10% limit.
After the buy-back scheme for Rs.1955.57 crore has been fully completed, the
company's reserves would drop to Rs.18401.72 crore and its paid-up equity capital
would drop by Rs.10.29 crore to Rs.431.71 crore. Hence, its paid up capital and free
reserves after buy-back would drop to Rs.18833.43 crore. Thus, the debt-equity ratio
after buy-back scheme has been fully completed would be 0.068, which is less than the
stipulated 2:1.
Hence, XYZ Ltd. can proceed with the proposed buy-back scheme by passing a
resolution passed at the Board meeting.
Answer 2A(i)
Dissenting Shareholders means the holders of the shares who have validly exercised
and not effectively withdrawn or lost their rights to dissent from the merger and to receive
payment of the fair value of their shares. In terms of Section 44A(3) of the Banking
Regulation Act, 1949, a dissenting shareholder is entitled, in the event of the scheme
being sanctioned by the Reserve Bank of India, to claim within 3 months from the date
of sanction, from the banking company concerned, in respect of the shares held by him
in that company, their value as determined by the Reserve Bank of India when sanctioning
the scheme and such determination by the Reserve Bank of India as to the value of the
shares to be paid to the dissenting shareholders shall be final for all purposes.
To enable the Reserve Bank of India to determine such value, the amalgamating/
amalgamated banking company shall submit the following:
a. A report on the valuation of the shares of the amalgamating / amalgamated
company made for this purpose by the valuers appointed for the determination
of the swap ratio.
b. Detailed computation of such valuation.
c. Where the shares of the amalgamating / amalgamated company are quoted on
the stock exchange -
i. Details of the monthly high and low of the quotes on the exchange where
the shares are most widely traded together with number of shares traded
during the six months immediately preceding the date on which the scheme
of amalgamation is approved by the Boards.
ii. The quoted price of the share at close on each of the fourteen days
PP–CRIL&W–December 2019 38
immediately preceding the date on which the scheme of amalgamation is
approved by the Boards.
d. Such other information and documents as the Reserve Bank of India may require.
Answer 2A(ii)
Yes, the statement is true and agreeable.
The preliminary study to valuation involves the following aspects:
1. Purpose of valuation.
2. Goodwill/Brand name in the market.
3. Business environment of the entity to be valued.
4. Estimation/forecast of future cash flows as accurately as possible.
5. Is company listed on any stock exchange?
6. If listed, whether shares of the company are traded frequently?
7. The industry to which the concerned entity belongs to.
8. The industry P/E ratio, past and future growth rate.
9. Who are the competitors locally and globally?
10. Whether any similar valuation has been done recently
11. The technology concerning the enterprise and its probability of obsolescence.
12. The accepted discounting rate.
13. Market capitalization aspects.
14. Identification of hidden liabilities through analysis of material contracts.
15. Last years audited balance sheets.
Answer 2A(iii)
Cases which amount to reduction of share capital but where no approval/confirmation
by the Tribunal is necessary:
(a) Surrender of shares – ‘Surrender of shares’ means the surrender of shares already
issued, to the company, by the registered holder of shares. Where shares are
surrendered to the company, whether by way of settlement of a dispute or for any
other reason, it will have the same effect as a transfer in favour of the company
and amount to a reduction of capital. But if, under any arrangement, such shares,
instead of being surrendered to the company, are transferred to a nominee of the
company then there will be no reduction of capital [Collector of Moradabad v.
Equity Insurance Co. Ltd., (1948) 18 Com Cases 309: AIR 1948 Oudh 197].
Surrender may be accepted by the company under the same circumstances
where forfeiture is justified. It has the effect of releasing the shareholder whose
surrender is accepted for further liability on shares.
39 PP–CRIL&W–December 2019
The Companies Act, 2013 contains no provision for surrender of shares. Thus,
surrender of shares is valid only when Articles of Association provide for the
same and:
(i) where forfeiture of such shares is justified; or
(ii) when shares are surrendered in exchange for new shares of same nominal
value. Both forfeiture and surrender lead to termination of membership.
However, in the case of forfeiture, it is at the initiative of company and in
the case of surrender it is at the initiative of member or shareholder.
(b) Forfeiture of shares - A company may if authorised by its articles, forfeit shares
for non-payment of calls and the same will not require confirmation/approval of
the Tribunal.
(c) Diminution of capital - Where the company cancels shares which have not been
taken or agreed to be taken by any person.
(d) Redemption of redeemable preference shares.
(e) Buy-back of its own shares.
Question 3
(a) What are the details to be disclosed under the explanatory statement of the
notice of the meeting in respect of the scheme of compromise or arrangement ?
(b) What are the various stages involved in the merger of a company under the
Companies Act, 2013 ?
(c) How goodwill and capital reserve are differentiated as per AS-14 ?
(d) What are the kinds of Takeovers practiced in the business world ?
(e) Define capital assets as per Income Tax Act, 1961. (3 marks each)
Answer 3(a)
Explanatory Statement of the notice of meeting in respect of the scheme of
compromise or arrangement include the following:
(a) Parties involved in compromise or arrangement;
(b) Appointed date, effective dale, share exchange ratio (if applicable) and other
considerations, if any;
(c) Summary of valuation report (if applicable) including basis of valuation and
fairness opinion of the registered valuer, if any, and the declaration that the
valuation report is available for inspection at the registered office of the company;
(d) Details of capital or debt restructuring, if any;
(e) Rationale for the compromise or arrangement;
(f) Benefits of the compromise or arrangement as perceived by the Board of directors
to the company, members, creditors and others (as applicable);
(g) Amount due to unsecured creditors.
PP–CRIL&W–December 2019 40
Answer 3(b)
Broad stages involved in merger of a company are listed below:
Stage 1 - Drafting of the Scheme
Stage 2 - Obtaining the approval of the Board of Directors of the companies involved
Stage 3 - Obtaining approval of the stock exchanges in case of listed companies
Stage 4 - Application / Petition for convening the meeting of members/creditors
shall be filed with National Company Law Tribunal
Stage 5 - Convening meetings of the shareholders and creditors and obtaining their
consent on Scheme
Stage 6 - Approvals or No objection from Regional Director / Official Liquidator
Stage 7 - Filing of final petition with NCLT for approving the Scheme
Stage 8 - Obtaining order for approval for scheme of merger/amalgamation from the
National Company Law Tribunal.
Answer 3(c)
As per Accounting Standard – 14, goodwill is the excess of the price paid in a
purchase over the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired.
Capital reserve is the excess of the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired
over the purchase price.
The concept of Goodwill or capital reserve will arise only when amalgamation is in
the nature of purchase.
Answer 3(d)
Takeovers may be broadly classified into three kinds:
(i) Friendly Takeover : Friendly takeover is with the consent of target company. In
friendly takeover, there is an agreement between the management of two
companies through negotiations and the takeover bid may be with the consent
of majority or all shareholders of the target company.
(ii) Hostile Takeover : When an acquirer company does not offer the target company
the proposal to acquire its undertaking but silently and unilaterally pursues efforts
to gain control against the wishes of existing management.
(iii) Bailout Takeover : Takeover of a financially sick company by a profit earning
company to bailout the former is known as bailout takeover.
Answer 3(e)
‘Capital asset’ is defined under section 2(14) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as,
(a) Property of any kind held by an assessee, whether or not connected with his
business or profession;
(b) Any securities held by a Foreign Institutional Investor which has invested in
41 PP–CRIL&W–December 2019
such securities in accordance with the regulations made under Securities and
Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.
But does not include the following:
(1) Any stock in trade (Other than the securities referred to in sub-clause (b)),
consumables stores or raw materials held for the purpose of his business or
profession
(2) Personal effect
(3) Agricultural land in India, which is not an urban agricultural land. In other words,
it must be rural agricultural land.
PART–II
Question 4
(a) What are the contents of the report to be submitted to the Tribunal by the Company
Liquidator against the winding up order issued by the Tribunal under section
281(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 ? (5 marks)
(b) Explain the procedure to be followed by the Adjudicating Authority on receipt of
an application by the financial creditor for initiation of corporate insolvency
resolution process. (5 marks)
(c) The moratorium shall not apply to a surety in a contract of guarantee to a
corporate debtor. Do you agree with this ? What is the effect of the order of
moratorium ? What are the purposes served by the declaration of moratorium ?
(5 marks)
(d) Explain the objective and procedural requirements for issuance of Public Notice
under section 102 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. (5 marks)
Answer 4(a)
According to section 281(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, Company Liquidator shall
submit to the Tribunal, a report containing the following particulars:
(a) the nature and details of the assets of the company including their location and
value, stating separately the cash balance in hand and in the bank, if any, and
the negotiable securities, if any, held by the company:
Provided that the valuation of the assets shall be obtained from registered valuers
for this purpose;
(b) amount of capital issued, subscribed and paid-up;
(c) the existing and contingent liabilities of the company including names, addresses
and occupations of its creditors, stating separately the amount of secured and
unsecured debts, and in the case of secured debts, particulars of the securities
given, whether by the company or an officer thereof, their value and the dates
on which they were given;
(d) the debts due to the company and the names, addresses and occupations of
PP–CRIL&W–December 2019 42
the persons from whom they are due and the amount likely to be realised on
account thereof;
(e) guarantees, if any, extended by the company;
(f) list of contributories and dues, if any, payable by them and details of any unpaid
call;
(g) details of trademarks and intellectual properties, if any, owned by the company;
(h) details of subsisting contracts, joint ventures and collaborations, if any;
(i) details of holding and subsidiary companies, if any;
(j) details of legal cases filed by or against the company; and
(k) any other information which the Tribunal may direct or the Company Liquidator
may consider necessary to include.
The Company Liquidator shall include in his report the manner in which the company
was promoted or formed and whether in his opinion any fraud has been committed by
any person in its promotion or formation or by any officer of the company in relation to
the company since the formation thereof and any other matters which, in his opinion, is
desirable to bring to the notice of the Tribunal. [Section 281(2)].
The Company Liquidator shall also make a report on the viability of the business of
the company or the steps which, in his opinion, are necessary for maximising the value
of the assets of the company. [Section 281(3)].
Answer 4(b)
As per sections 7(4), 7(5) and 7(7) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016,
following procedure is to be followed by Adjudicating Authority on receipt of an application
by the financial creditor for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process:
(i) The Adjudicating Authority shall, within fourteen days of the receipt of the
application, ascertain the existence of a default from the records of an information
utility or on the basis of other evidence furnished by the financial creditor.
(ii) Where the Adjudicating Authority is satisfied that-
(a) a default has occurred and the application is complete, and there is no
disciplinary proceedings pending against the proposed resolution
professional, it may, by order, admit such application; or
(b) default has not occurred or the application is incomplete or any disciplinary
proceeding is pending against the proposed resolution professional, it may,
by order, reject such application:
(iii) Adjudicating Authority shall, before rejecting the application, give a notice to the
applicant to rectify the defect in his application within seven days of receipt of
such notice from the Adjudicating Authority.
(iv) The Adjudicating Authority shall communicate to the financial creditor and the
corporate debtor, within seven days of admission or rejection of such application,
as the case may be.
43 PP–CRIL&W–December 2019
Answer 4(c)
Yes, the moratorium shall not apply to a surety in a contract of guarantee to a
corporate debtor.
Effect of order of moratorium - The order of moratorium shall have effect from the
date of such order till the completion of the corporate insolvency resolution process.
Provided that where at any time during the corporate insolvency resolution process
period, if the NCLT approves the resolution plan under section 31(1) of the Insolvency
and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (the Code) or passes an order for liquidation of corporate
debtor under section 33 of the Code, the moratorium shall cease to have effect from the
date of such approval or liquidation order, as the case may be. [Section 14(4)].
Declaration of moratorium serves the following purposes:
• Ensures that multiple proceedings are not taking place simultaneously and thus
avoids the possibility of potentially conflicting outcomes of related proceedings.
• Keeps the corporate debtor's assets together during the insolvency resolution
process and facilitates orderly completion of the process,
• Ensures that the company may continue as a going concern while the creditors
assess the options for resolution of default.
• Prohibition on disposal of the corporate debtor's assets ensure that the corporate
debtor/management does not transfer its assets, thereby stripping the corporate
debtor of value during the corporate insolvency resolution process.
Answer 4(d)
The objective of section 102 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is to
provide an opportunity to all the creditors to be a part of the repayment plan. Section 102
provides for the issuance of a public notice by the Adjudicating Authority inviting claims
from the creditors of the debtor.
Issuance of public notice - According to sub-section (1) of section 102 of the
Code, the Adjudicating Authority shall issue a public notice within seven days of passing
the order under section 100 inviting claims from all creditors within twenty-one days of
such issue.
According to sub-section (3) of section 102 of the Code, such notice shall be-
(a) published in at least one English and one vernacular newspaper which is in
circulation in the state where the debtor resides;
(b) affixed in the premises of the Adjudicating Authority; and
(c) placed on the website of the Adjudicating Authority.
Inclusion of certain details - According to sub-section (2) of section 102 of the
Code, the notice under sub-section (1) shall include-
(a) details of the order admitting the application;
(b) particulars of the resolution professional with whom the claims are to be
registered; and
(c) the last date for subrnission of claims.
PP–CRIL&W–December 2019 44
Question 5
(a) Under what circumstances the Certificate of Registration of an Asset
Reconstruction Company issued under SARFAESI Act, 2002 can be cancelled?
(3 marks)
(b) Explain the changes brought about in section 30 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy
Code, 2016 by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Second Amendment) Act, 2018.
(3 marks)
(c) Sun Finserve Ltd., a financial-cum-operational creditor to a corporate debtor is
aggrieved by the action of the resolution professional. Suggest the measures
available to the company under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
(3 marks)
(d) X Ltd., a corporate debtor owes to Y Ltd. `100 lakh on account of unsecured
loan @ 10% per annum and `35 lakh towards raw material supplied by Y Ltd.
Determine status of Y Ltd. in relation to the corporate debtor. Also, state the
status under which Y Ltd. can make representation on the committee of creditors?
(3 marks)
(e) The liquidator shall ordinarily sell the assets of the corporate debtor through
auction method. Opine whether the liquidator can sell assets by a route other
than auction method ? (3 marks)
Answer 5(a)
Section 4 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 dealing with the cancellation of certificate of
registration, provides as under:
(1) The Reserve Bank may cancel a certificate of registration granted to asset
reconstruction company, if such company -
(a) ceases to carry on the business of securitisation or asset reconstruction; or
(b) ceases to receive or hold any investment from a qualified buyer; or
(c) has failed to comply with any conditions subject to which the certificate of
registration has been granted to it; or
(d) at any time fails to fulfil any of the conditions referred to in clauses (a) to (g)
of subsection (3) of section 3; or
(e) fails to –
i. comply with any direction issued by the Reserve Bank under the
provisions of this Act; or
ii. maintain accounts in accordance with the requirements of any law or
any direction or order issued by the Reserve Bank of India under the
provisions of this Act; or
iii. submit or offer for inspection its books of account or other relevant
documents when so demanded by the Reserve Bank; or
iv. obtain prior approval of the Reserve Bank required under sub-section
(6) of section 3 of the Act.
45 PP–CRIL&W–December 2019
Answer 5(b)
Changes brought about in section 30 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Second Amendment) Act, 2018 are as under:
(a) A resolution applicant to file an affidavit stating that it is eligible under section
29A of the Code.
(b) Added an explanation to sub-section (2) of section 30 of the Code to clarify that
if any approval of shareholders is required under the Companies Act, 2013 or
any other law for the time being in force for the implementation of actions under
the resolution plan, such approval shall be deemed to have been given and it
shall not be a contravention of that Act or law.
(c) Substituted sub-section (4) of section 30 of the Code, inter alia, reducing the
threshold for voting from 75% to 66% for approving a resolution plan by committee
of creditors.
(d) in sub-section (2), in clauses (a) and (b), for the word "repayment" at both the
places where it occurs, the word "payment" shall be substituted;
(e) after the third proviso, the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:— "Provided
also that the eligibility criteria in section 29A as amended by the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Ordinance, 2018 shall apply to the resolution
applicant who has not submitted resolution plan as on the date of commencement
of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Ordinance, 2018.".
Answer 5(c)
Section 217 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 deals with complaints
against insolvency professional agency or its member or information utility. It states
that,
“Any person aggrieved by the functioning of an insolvency professional agency or
insolvency professional or an information utility may file a complaint to the Board in
such form, within such time and in such manner as may be specified.”
Further, Model Bye Laws of Insolvency Professional Agencies also have Grievance
Redressal Mechanism for redressing grievances against the agency or any member of
the agency.
Answer 5(d)
Operational Creditors : An operational creditor means a person to whom an operational
debt is owed and includes any person to whom such debt has been legally assigned or
transferred. They are suppliers of goods or services to any company or operational
debtor.
Financial Creditors : Financial creditor is any person to whom a financial debt is owned
and includes a person to whom such debt has been legally assigned or transferred to.
According to the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Y Ltd.
will be classified as financial as well as operational creditor in relation to X Ltd., a
corporate debtor.
PP–CRIL&W–December 2019 46
Thus, according to section 21(4) of the Code, Y Ltd. shall be included in the committee
of creditors and shall have a voting share proportionate to the extent of financial debts
owed to such creditor. In the instant case, to the extent of Rs.100 lakh, Y Ltd. being a
financial creditor.
Answer 5(e)
Yes, the liquidator can sell assets by a route other than auction method when:
(a) the asset is perishable;
(b) the asset is likely to deteriorate in value significantly if not sold immediately;
(c) the asset is sold at a price higher than the reserve price of a failed auction; or
(d) the prior permission of the Adjudicating Authority has been obtained for such
sale.
Attempt all parts of either Q. No. 6 or Q. No. 6A
Question 6
(a) The procedure to be followed for voluntary liquidation proceedings is largely
similar to the procedure to be followed for insolvent liquidation. However, there
are differences between them. What are such marked differences ?
(b) The Resolution Professional has reported cases of undervalued transactions
during resolution process to the Adjudicating Authority. What orders can be
passed by the Adjudicating Authority in this regard ?
(c) An insolvency professional shall be eligible to be appointed as a liquidator if he,
and every partner or director of the insolvency professional entity of which he is
a partner or director is independent of the corporate person. How will you judge
that a person is independent of the corporate person ? (5 marks each)
OR (Alternate question to Q. No. 6)
Question 6A
(i) As per section 25(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the Resolution
Professional shall undertake actions in order to preserve and protect the assets
of the corporate debtor. Briefly explain the duties of the Resolution Professional.
(ii) Discuss the provisions dealing with cases involving cross-border insolvency
under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
(iii) You are the liquidator of ABC Ltd. which is currently undergoing liquidation
process. As a liquidator, indicate how you will handle the priority of claims for
distribution of liquidation proceeds of ABC Ltd. as enumerated in the Insolvency
and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. (5 marks each)
Answer 6(a)
Though the procedure to be followed for voluntary liquidation proceedings under
Chapter V Part II of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is largely similar to the
47 PP–CRIL&W–December 2019
procedure to be followed for liquidation under Chapter III Part II of the Code yet there are
marked differences as mentioned below:
1. To initiate voluntary liquidation proceedings, where the corporate person is
registered as a company, the directors have to provide a declaration of solvency
and a declaration that the company is not being liquidated to defraud any person.
2. The declarations have to be accompanied by (a) the audited financial statements
of the company and (b) a record of its business operations for the previous two
years or the period since its incorporation whichever is later.
3. Further, a report of the valuation of the assets of the company prepared by a
registered valuer has to be provided.
4. A resolution in favour of the voluntary winding-up of the company and appointment
of an insolvency professional as the liquidator has to be passed within four
weeks of the declaration under clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 59 of the
Code.
5. Where the company owes any debt to any person, creditors representing two-
thirds in value of the debt of the company shall approve the resolution passed
under clause (c) of sub-section (3) of section 59 of the Code within seven days
of such resolution.
Answer 6(b)
Section 48 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 lists out the orders that
may be passed by the Adjudicating Authority setting aside the transaction at undervalue.
According to section 48, the order of the Adjudicating Authority under sub-section (1) of
section 45 of the Code may provide for the following:
(a) require any property transferred as part of the transaction, to be vested in the
corporate debtor;
(b) release or discharge (in whole or in part) any security interest granted by the
corporate debtor;
(c) require any person to pay such sums, in respect of benefits received by such
person, to the liquidator or the resolution professional as the case may be, as
the Adjudicating Authority may direct; or
(d) require the payment of such consideration for the transaction as may be
determined by an independent expert.
Answer 6(c)
According to Regulation 3 (1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India
(Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016, a person shall be considered independent of
the corporate person, if he -
(a) is eligible to be appointed as an independent director on the Board of the corporate
person under section 149 of the Companies Act, 2013, where the corporate
person is a company;
(b) is not a related party of the corporate person; or
PP–CRIL&W–December 2019 48
(c) has not been an employee or proprietor or a partner –
(i) of a firm of auditors or secretarial auditors or cost auditors of the corporate
person; or
(ii) of a legal or a consulting firm, that has or had any transaction with the
corporate person contributing ten per cent or more of the gross turnover of
such firm, in the last three years.
Answer 6A(i)
Section 25 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 sets out the duties of
resolution professional to preserve and protect the assets of the corporate debtor, including
the continued business operations of the corporate debtor and lays down the functions
he may perform for the same. [Section 25(1)]
Section 25(2) of the Code provides that for the purposes of sub-section (1) of section
25, the resolution professional shall undertake the following actions, namely:
(a) take immediate custody and control of all the assets of the corporate debtor,
including the business records of the corporate debtor;
(b) represent and act on behalf of the corporate debtor with third parties, exercise
rights for the benefit of the corporate debtor in judicial, quasi-judicial or arbitration
proceedings,
(c) raise interim finances subject to the approval of the committee of creditors
under section 28 of the Code,
(d) appoint accountants, legal or other professionals in the manner as specified by
Board,
(e) maintain an updated list of claims,
(f) convene and attend all meetings of the committee of creditors,
(g) prepare the information memorandum in accordance with section 29 of the Code,
(h) invite prospective resolution applicants, who fulfil such criteria as may be laid
down by him with the approval of committee of creditors, having regard to the
complexity and scale of operations of the business of the corporate debtor and
such other conditions as may be specified by the Board, to submit a resolution
plan or plans.
(i) present all resolution plans at the meetings of the committee of creditors,
(j) file application for avoidance of transactions in accordance with Chapter III, if
any, and
(k) such other actions as may be specified by the Board.
Answer 6(A)(ii)
Sections 234 and 235 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 make provisions
to deal with cases involving cross border insolvency. Section 234 empowers the Central
Government to enter into an agreement with other countries to resolve situations pertaining
to cross border insolvency.
49 PP–CRIL&W–December 2019
Section 235 of the Code lays down that notwithstanding anything contained in this
Code or any law for the time being in force if, in the course of insolvency resolution
process, or liquidation or bankruptcy proceedings, as the case may be, under this Code,
the resolution professional, liquidator or bankruptcy trustee, as the case may be, is of
the opinion that assets of the corporate debtor or debtor, including a personal guarantor
of a corporate debtor, are situated in a country outside India with which reciprocal
arrangements have been made under section 234, he may make an application to the
Adjudicating Authority that evidence or action relating to such assets is required in
connection with such process or proceeding. [Section 235(1)].
The Adjudicating Authority on receipt of an application and, on being satisfied that
evidence or action relating to assets is required in connection with insolvency resolution
process or liquidation or bankruptcy proceeding, may issue a letter of request to a court
or an authority of such country competent to deal with such request. [Section 235(2)].
Answer 6(A)(iii)
Section 53 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 has significantly altered
the priority of claims for distribution of liquidation proceeds of a corporate debtor. The
priority of claims as enumerated in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 provides
for payment to unsecured financial creditors before payment towards Government dues.
Section 53(1) of the Code stipulates that the proceeds from the sale of the liquidation
assets shall be distributed in the following order of priority:
(a) the insolvency resolution process costs and the liquidation costs paid in full;
(b) workmen's dues for the period of twenty-four months preceding the liquidation
commencement date; and debts owed to a secured creditor;
(c) wages and any unpaid dues owed to employees other than workmen for the
period of twelve months preceding the liquidation commencement date;
(d) financial debts owed to unsecured creditors;
(e) Government dues and remaining secured creditors (any remaining debt if they
enforce their collateral);
(f) any remaining debts and dues;
(g) preference shareholders, if any; and
(h) equity shareholders or partners, as the case may be.
***
PP–RCDNR–December 2019 50
Question 1
Recognizing the supreme authority of the shareholders', the Companies Act, 2013
has given authority to them to appoint directors at the Annual General Meetings to
direct, control, conduct and manage the business and affairs of the company.
Under the Companies Act, 2013 the powers have been divided between two segments:
one is the Board of Directors and the other is of shareholders. The Directors exercise
their powers through meetings of Board of directors and shareholders exercise their
powers through Annual General Meetings/General Meetings. Although constitutionally
all the acts relating to the company can be performed in General Meetings but most of
the powers are delegated to the Board by virtue of the constitutional documents of the
company viz. the Memorandum and Articles of Association.
The Companies Act, 2013 demarcates between the power of the directors as well as
that of shareholders. The shareholders exercise their powers at the general meetings by
50
51 PP–RCDNR–December 2019
way of ordinary/special resolutions. Some of the businesses which can be transacted at
meetings of shareholders are as under:
• Alteration of Memorandum of Association and Articles of Association.
• Further issue of share capital.
• To transfer some portions of uncalled capital to reserve capital to be called up
only in the event of winding up of the company.
• To reduce the share capital of the company.
• To shift the registered office of the company outside the state in which the
registered office is situated at present.
• To decide a place other than the registered office of the company where the
statutory books, required to be maintained may be kept.
• To appoint auditors.
• To approach Central Government for investigation into the affairs of the company.
• To allow Related Party Transaction.
• To allow a director, partner or his relative to hold office or place of profit.
• Payment of commission of more than 1% of the net profits of the company to a
managing or a whole time director or a manager.
• To make loans, to extend guarantee or provide security to other companies or
make investment beyond the limit specified.
• To borrow money and to charge out the assets of the company to secure the
borrowed money.
• To appoint directors.
• To remove directors.
• To increase or reduce the number of directors within the limits laid down in
Articles of Association.
• To cancel, redeem debentures etc.
Answer 1(b)
As per section 420(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, the National Company Law
Tribunal may at any time within two years from the date of the order, with a view to
rectifying any mistake apparent from the record:
(i) Amend any order passed by it, and
(ii) Shall make such amendment, if the mistake is brought to its notice by the
parties.
Provided that no such amendment shall be made in respect of any order against
which an appeal has been preferred.
PP–RCDNR–December 2019 52
Further, pursuant to Rule 11 of National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016, Tribunal
has inherent power to make such order as may be necessary for meeting the end of
justice or to prevent abuse of the process of the tribunal, accordingly, the Tribunal can
rectified the order passed by its own.
In Sree Ayyanar Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax ,
2008 (301 ITR 434), it was held that under first part of the provision, the tribunal is
empowered to suo-moto rectify any mistakes apparent on record any time within two
years from the date of its original order. Under the second part, either the taxpayer or the
department may file an application highlighting the mistake apparent on record.
In light of the provision, the Apex Court held that the appellate tribunal took time
beyond the stipulated period even though the application was filed well within the period.
Thus, in the mentioned event the applicant has filed the application within the stipulated
period of two years from the date of original order, it is binding for the appellate tribunal
to decide the matter on the basis of merits and not on the ground of limitation.
Thus, Section 420(2) read with Rule 11, 154 and 155 of National Company Law
Tribunal Rules, 2016 substantiate that the Tribunal has power to rectify a mistake apparent
from the record on its own motion or on an application by a party under the Act.
Answer 1(c)
A legal compliance program is a set of internal policies and procedures of a company
to comply with laws, rules, and regulations or to uphold business reputation. A compliance
team examines the rules set forth by government bodies, creates a compliance program,
implements it throughout the company, and enforces adherence to the program.
Legal Compliance programs need to be tailored to the specific company's needs,
there are principles to consider in reviewing a program like:
• There should be a strong "tone at the top" from the board and senior management
emphasizing the company's commitment to full compliance with legal and
regulatory requirements, as well as internal policies.
• There should be clear reporting systems in place both at the employee level and
at the management level so that employees understand when and to whom they
should report suspected violations and so that management understands the
board's or committee's informational needs for its oversight purposes.
Answer 1(d)
If any offence committed by Company or the officers was compounded under section
441 of the Companies Act, 2013, and an offence similar to what was compounded earlier
is committed again by a company or its officers within a period of three years from the
date on which the earlier offence was compounded, then the provisions of section 441 of
the Companies Act, 2013 will not be applicable and the company and the officers concerned
will not be eligible for compounding again. In other words, similar offence can be
compounded only once in three years.
Section 451 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that if a company or an officer of
a company commits an offence punishable either with fine or with imprisonment and
where the same offence is committed for the second or subsequent occasions within a
53 PP–RCDNR–December 2019
period of three years, then, that company and every officer thereof who is in default shall
be punishable with twice the amount of fine for such offence in addition to any imprisonment
provided for that offence.
Attempt all parts of either Q. No. 2 or Q. No. 2A
Question 2
(a) Mr. Naryanan was the Managing Director of ABC India Limited and his wife Mrs.
Kaika was also a director of the Company. Proceedings were initiated by Registrar
of Companies (ROC) against the Company and its directors. Mr. Narayanan
died while the proceedings were pending. Subsequently, Mrs. Kaika was
impleaded as an accused in the proceedings after his death. She filed an
application in High Court under section 204 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973,
praying for discharge on the ground that notice had not been served upon her by
the ROC.
Would High Court grant relief to Mrs. Kaika on this ground ? Answer with reference
to Judicial Pronouncement(s).
(b) The Board of Directors of BIJI Private Limited made an application to the Registrar
of Companies under section 248(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 for removal of
name of the Company. The Board submitted an affidavit that Company has no
pending liabilities. However, it was later found that few amounts were still payable
to creditors.
What penalties can be levied under the Companies Act, 2013 for such an
application ?
(c) Mrs. Meera was the Managing Director of ME India Private Limited. During her
tenure, she sold few properties of the Company and cleared all the registered
mortgages. She also diverted Company’s funds of ` 50 Lakhs to her bank account
and diverted another `10 Lakhs to pay off and discharge the Housing Loan on
her daughter’s property. Later, winding up proceedings were initiated against the
Company.
Can the Liquidator of the Company commence proceedings against Mrs. Meera
and her daughter in these circumstances ?
(d) Mrs. P who holds 500 equity shares of Zeta Limited made an application through
instrument of transfer to the Company for transfer of 300 equity shares in favour
of Mrs. H. Zeta Limited refused to register the transfer of shares in favour of
Mrs. H, stating that she has been declared as a wilful defaulter by the banks.
What are the rights available to Mrs. H, under the Companies Act, 2013 for such
refusal ? (4 marks each)
OR (Alternate question to Q. No. 2)
Question 2A
(i) XYZ Software Technologies Limited of Bengaluru was engaged in business of
software exports. During the past years, it had exported services to its Parent
entity in United States of America (USA), but failed to realize and repatriate the
PP–RCDNR–December 2019 54
foreign exchange due on its exports to India, within the stipulated time. The
Adjudicating Authority imposed a penalty under the provisions of Foreign
Exchange Management Act, 1999. Being aggrieved by this penalty, the Company
seeks your advice to file an appeal. Advise the Company.
(ii) “Several large companies and financial institutions worldwide no longer exist
today as they neglected the basic rules of Corporate Governance, Risk
Management and Control”.
Comment in the background of today’s business environment.
(iii) PSU Bank Limited, a public sector bank has detected a fraud being committed
by one of its large corporate customers. The alleged fraud seems to have been
perpetrated over a period of time, by diverting the funds received from the Bank
to offshore tax heavens by the promoter group. A forensic audit was ordered to
examine the details of such transactions. Meanwhile, the Central Government
has asked the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to investigate the fraud.
Discuss which division of CBI would investigate this case.
(iv) Mr. Ze, a Company Secretary has recently set up a Practice. Mr. Almora a
businessman reached out to Mr. Ze, to incorporate a Company. Mr. Ze assisted
him with the list of information required and also extended his professional
services for incorporation of the Company. When Mr. Ze was reviewing the
documents provided to him, for uploading the forms, he noticed that the
documents contained false information. Mr. Ze was apprehensive to go ahead
with the incorporation of the Company. Advise Mr. Ze. (4 marks each)
Answer 2(a)
The Madras High Court in case of K. Seethalakshmi v. Registrar of Companies and
Anor. rejected the plea of the petitioner that the ROC has not issued any notice to her.
The Managing Director had died when the proceedings were pending. The petitioner,
who was also a director and the wife of the deceased Managing Director was impleaded
as an accused in the proceedings. As the petitioner was impleaded as an accused, she
filed an application under section 204 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, praying for her
discharge. She claimed she could not be impleaded as an accused because of the
below grounds:
• Notice had not been served upon her but on her deceased husband.
• When there were other directors, the Registrar had picked out the petitioner to
proceed against.
The High Court refusing to discharge the petitioner by dismissing the petition, held
that:
• The petitioner was a director of the Company, when her husband the Managing
Director, died during the pendency of proceedings. Hence, for non-compliance
with the provisions of Sections 159 and 220, the director was also liable to
be proceeded against and punished under the law. It was the duty of the
petitioner as the surviving director, to comply with the provisions of the
Companies Act.
55 PP–RCDNR–December 2019
• The Registrar had impleaded the petitioner, as an accused on the death of her
husband, not merely because she was the wife of the deceased managing director
but because she was a director of the said company and liable to comply with
the mandatory requirements or the Act.
Hence, in the background of aforementioned case law, it can be concluded that the
High Court would not award any relief to Mrs. Kaika.
Answer 2(b)
As per section 251(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 where it is found that an application
by a company under section 248(2) has been made with the object of evading the
liabilities of the company or with the intention to deceive the creditors or to defraud any
other persons, the persons in charge of the management of the company shall,
notwithstanding that the company has been notified as dissolved-
(a) be jointly and severally liable to any person or persons who had incurred loss or
damage as a result of the company being notified as dissolved; and
(b) be punishable for fraud in the manner as provided in section 447 of the Companies
Act, 2013.
Further, Section 251(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 states that, the Registrar may
also recommend prosecution of the persons responsible for the filing of an application
under Section 248(2) of the Companies Act, 2013.
Based on above provisions, the Board of Directors of BIJI Private Limited will be
liable to penal provisions as per Section 251 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Answer 2(c)
Section 336 of the Companies Act, 2013 also covers the offences which were
committed by the officers of the company when the company was not under winding up.
In case where the company is subsequently ordered to be wound up, the offences
committed by the officers of the company while the company was a going concern, will
still be dealt under section 336, though such offence could be dealt with under other
relevant sections had it remain a going concern. Action covered under Section 336(1)(d)
are those which were committed within the twelve months immediately before the
commencement of the winding up or at any time thereafter.
Further, Section 329 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that any transfer of
property of any kind by a company other than the transfer made in the ordinary course of
business or the transfer is made in good faith and for a value consideration made within
a period of one year prior to the presentation of the petition for winding up shall be void
against the liquidator.
The facts provided are similar to the facts of Fodare Pty Ltd. v. Shearn [2011] case.
Shearn was the sole director of the Company during the relevant period and by sale of a
property of the Company, she cleared all registered mortgages and diverted funds to the
tune of A$ 383,000 to her bank account and diverted another A$ 251,000 to pay up and
discharge a mortgage over a her daughter's property. The company was wound up.
Liquidator commenced proceedings seeking a declaration that Shearn was in breach of
PP–RCDNR–December 2019 56
fiduciary duties and her daughter was charged on the ground that she falls within the
ambit of a constructive trustee as she was aware that she is receiving funds out of
proceeds arising from sale of company's property.
It was held that Shearn was liable to the Company for equitable compensation of
both the amounts and statutory compensation together with interest and costs. Further,
the Supreme Court held that her daughter was also liable to the company for equitable
compensation of A$ 251,000 plus interest. The Court found that the daughter might be
aware that her mother who was a former bankrupt did not have money and the property
that was sold belonged to the company.
The Court said the liability of the mother and the daughter for equitable compensation
of A$251,000 plus interest would run concurrently such that both of them will be jointly
and severally liable.
Hence it can be concluded that Mrs. Meera and her daughter would be jointly and
severally liable for diversion of Company's funds and the Liquidator of the company can
commence proceeding against Mrs. Meera and her daughter after following due procedures
provided in the Act.
Answer 2(d)
As per section 58(4) of the Companies Act, 2013, if a public company without
sufficient cause refuses to register the transfer of securities within a period of 30 days
from the date on which the instrument of transfer or the intimation of transmission, as
the case may be, is delivered to the company, the transferee may, within a period of 60
days of such refusal or where no intimation has been received from the company, within
90 days of the delivery of the instrument of transfer or intimation of transmission, appeal
to the Tribunal.
As per Section 58(5), the Tribunal, while dealing with such an appeal, may, after
hearing the parties, either dismiss the appeal, or by order -
(a) direct that the transfer or transmission shall be registered by the company and
the company shall comply with such order within a period of 10 days of the
receipt of the order; or
(b) direct rectification of the register and also direct the company to pay damages,
if any, sustained by any party aggrieved.
Thus Mrs. H can file an appeal with the Tribunal as mentioned above.
Answer 2A(i)
Sections 17 and 19 of Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 provide for appeals
against orders of Adjudicating Authority. If the Adjudicating Authority is Assistant Director
of Enforcement or Deputy Director of Enforcement, appeal will lie to Special Director
(Appeals).
Further appeal shall lie with Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange. However, if
the Adjudicating Authority is senior to the Assistant Director of Enforcement or Deputy
Director of Enforcement, then the appeal shall directly be made to the Appellate Tribunal.
Appeal to Special Director (Appeals) : Appeal against order of Assistant Director
57 PP–RCDNR–December 2019
of Enforcement or Deputy Director of Enforcement can be filed with Special Director
(Appeals) under Section 17 of the said act within 45 days from the date on which the
copy of the order made by the Adjudication Authority is received by the aggrieved person.
Appeal to Appellate Tribunal : Appeal against the order of Adjudicating Authority
being senior to Assistant Director of Enforcement or Deputy Director of Enforcement or
against the order of Special Director (Appeals) can be made to the Appellate Tribunal for
Foreign Exchange under Section 19 of Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 within
45 days from the date on which the copy of the order made by such Adjudicating Authority
or Special Director (Appeals) is received by the aggrieved person. It may be noted that
the Tribunal is the final fact finding authority and no appeal lies against the facts
determined by the Tribunal.
Hence, XYZ Software Technologies may file an appeal based on the Adjudicating
Authority.
Answer 2A(ii)
The importance of corporate governance in risk management is amply supported by
the reasoning of the Kumar Mangalam Birla Committee on Corporate Governance to
implement corporate governance in India.
Risk Management is an integral component of corporate governance and good
management. There is a growing realization that corporate governance has an impact on
enterprise risk management. Several large companies and financial institutions worldwide
no longer exist or have been taken over precisely because they neglected the basic
rules of risk management and control. Some common risk management problems in
relation to corporate governance that appeared in many financial institutions before and
during the crisis according to the OECD (2009) was because of following reasons :
• Risks were frequently not linked to strategy which is a key issue to ensuring
that risk management has a focus on the business context;
• Risk definitions are often poorly expressed. Better risk definitions (context,
event. consequence) are contrary to a lot of current thinking in risk management
which has shorten risk descriptions to the smallest number of words possible;
• Organizations weren't always in a position to develop intelligent responses to
risks;
• Boards didn't take stakeholders and guardians into account in detailing responses
to risk;
• Important parts of the value chain were outsourced to others.
Answer 2A(iii)
Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has grown into a multidisciplinary investigation
agency over a period of time. Today it has the following three divisions for investigation
of crime -
i. Anti-Corruption Division - for investigation of cases under the Prevention of
Corruption Act, 1988 against Public officials and the employees of Central
Government, Public Sector Undertakings, Corporations or Bodies owned or
PP–RCDNR–December 2019 58
controlled by the Government of India - it is the largest division having presence
almost in all the States of India.
ii. Economic Offences Division - for investigation of major financial scams and
serious economic frauds, including crimes relating to Fake Indian Currency
Notes, Bank Frauds and Cyber Crime.
iii. Special Crimes Division - for investigation of serious, sensational and organized
crime under the Indian Penal Code and other laws on the requests of State
Governments or on the orders of the Supreme Court and High Courts.
The laws under which CBI can investigate Crime are notified by the Central
Government under section 3 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946.
According to Section 3, The Central Government may, by notification in the Official
Gazette, specify the offences or classes of offences which are to be investigated by the
Delhi Special Police Establishment.
As the fraud in PSU Bank is a major financial scam. It would be investigated by the
Economic Offences division of CBI.
Answer 2A(iv)
Section 7 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with the documents to be filed with the
concerned Registrar of Companies (ROC) for incorporation of a company. While dealing
with the requirements, under Section 7(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 it has been stated
that if a person furnishes false information or incorrect particulars or suppresses material
information then the person is liable for action under Section 447 of the Companies Act,
2013.
Further, Section 7(6) also provides that the promoters, the first directors and the
fiduciaries viz, the Chartered Accountant, the Company Secretary in practice or the
Cost Accountant or theAdvocate, the Managing Director or the Secretary of the Company
who have given a declaration in the prescribed format shall also be liable for action
under Section 447 of the Companies Act, 2013. Thus the penal provision extends to the
professionals also apart from the officers of the company.
Hence, Mr. Ze should take note of the aforementioned provisions and shall go for
incorporation of the company with the correct information only otherwise, he should not
go ahead with the incorporation of the Company, knowing that the documents provided
contains false information.
Attempt all parts of either Q. No. 3 or Q. No. 3A
Question 3
(a) PQ Limited was a Company listed on XYZ Stock Exchange. The Company was
making continuous losses and was not performing well. There were also reports
of alleged financial irregularities in media. Also, many complaints were received
by Securities Board of India (SEBI), regarding its listed securities. Subsequently,
SEBI passed an Order to delist the securities of the Company from the said
stock exchange.
As a Company Secretary, advise PQ Limited for further course of action.
59 PP–RCDNR–December 2019
(b) Thinking Star Limited, a Public Limited Company was into manufacturing of
steel and steel products. The Company wanted to expand its operations and to
fund the same, it evaluated various options including bank loan, private placement,
etc. However, due to a paucity of time the Company went ahead and funded its
operations by issuing shares to a friend of Mr. XY, the Managing Director of the
Company on private placement basis. The Company failed to comply with the
provisions of the Companies Act, 2013. Mr. XY was not willing to act, unless
there was any notice from the regulators. Mr. S, the Corporate Advisor to the
Company suggested Mr. XY to compound the offence as it would be in the best
interest of the Company.
Advise Mr. XY.
(c) Explain the various types of Criminal Courts under the Criminal Procedure Code,
1973 and their powers in brief.
(d) Mr. Krish, a resident of Mumbai is a friend of Mr. Parth, who stays in Manali. As
Mr. Parth did not have much exposure and information about personal finance
and investment options in Manali, he trusted his friend for his investments. As
per their agreement, Mr. Parth remitted ` 1 Lakh to Mr. Krish to invest in mutual
funds and stock market. Mr. Krish employs the money in his own business
ignoring his understanding with Mr. Parth.
Has Mr. Krish committed criminal breach of trust ? (4 marks each)
OR (Alternate question to Q. No. 3)
Question 3A
(i) During the previous year, Alfa Limited could not conduct its Annual General
Meeting (AGM) within the timelines as per the Companies Act, 2013 due to
some internal and operational issues. In the current year also, the Company
could not conduct its AGM within stipulated time, thereby committing the same
default in the current year as well.
What would be the penal provisions for such default ?
(ii) Infomatika Limited, a Public Limited Company was incorporated under the
Companies Act, 1956 in the year 2010. During the financial year ended March
31, 2019, the Company made a contribution of ` 50 Lakhs to a local political
party, which amounts to 9% of its average net profits during three immediately
preceding financial years. Is the Company compliant with the provisions of the
Companies Act, 2013, if not, what would be the penal provisions for such an
act?
(iii) Ms. Rekha was working as ‘Gram Sachiv’ for ten gram panchayats. She was a
trusted person of the local villagers and they respected her. Ms. Rekha, collected
a sum of ` 5 Lakhs from fifty villagers in the gram panchayats saying she would
pay their house tax and issued receipts to them. Later it was found that she did
not deposit the money into Government treasury, but utilized it for her personal
purposes.
The villagers wanted to file a case against Ms. Rekha, when they came to know
of the misappropriation done by her.
PP–RCDNR–December 2019 60
Will the villagers be successful in filing a case against Ms. Rekha ?
(iv) Mr. A sold goods to Mr. B amounting to `1 crore. Mr. B was delinquent in
payment, after repeated follow-ups, he issued a cheque for the said amount to
Mr. A. The cheque was not honoured and Mr. A filed a cheque bouncing case
against Mr. B. The Court issued summons to Mr. B. Later, Mr. A wanted to
withdraw the case.
Will the Magistrate permit Mr. A to withdraw the case at this stage ?
(4 marks each)
Answer 3(a)
As per Section 15T of the SEBI Act, 1992, any person aggrieved by an order of the
Board or by an order made by an adjudicating officer may prefer an appeal to a Securities
Appellate Tribunal having jurisdiction in the matter.
The appeal shall be filed within a period of 45 days from the date on which a copy of
the order made by the SEBI or the Adjudicating Officer, as the case may be, is received
by him.
The Tribunal shall give an opportunity of being heard to the respondent and may
pass the order confirming, modifying or setting aside the decision of SEBI.SAT shall
also send a copy of its order to every party to appeal and to the concerned adjudicating
officer. Further, the matter filed before SAT is dealt with as expeditiously as possible
and is endeavoured to be disposed of within 6 months from the date of receipt of the
appeal.
Thus, PQ Limited should consider filing an appeal to Securities Appellate Tribunal
(SAT).
Alternatively, the company may go for delisting of the securities in accordance with
the SEBI (Delisting of Securities) Regulations, 2009.
Answer 3(b)
As provided under section 441 of the Companies Act, 2013 any offence punishable
(whether committed by a company or any officer thereof) not being an offence punishable
with imprisonment only, or punishable with imprisonment and also with fine, may, either
before or after the institution of any prosecution, be compounded by the Tribunal; or
where the maximum amount of fine which may be imposed for such offence does not
exceed twenty five lakh rupees, by the Regional Director or any officer authorised by the
Central Government.
However, As per Section 454 of the Companies Act,2013 provides that the
adjudicating officer appointed by the central government may, by an order impose the
penalty on the company, the officer who is in default, or any other person, as the case
may be, stating therein any non-compliance or default under the relevant provisions of
this Act; and direct such company, or officer who is in default, or any other person, as
the case may be, to rectify the default, wherever he considers fit.
In the given case, the company has made private placement without complying the
provisions under section 42 of the Companies Act, 2013. Hence, the promoters and
directors of the company be liable for a penalty which may extend to the amount raised
61 PP–RCDNR–December 2019
through the private placement or two crore rupees, whichever is lower, and the company
shall also refund all monies with interest to subscribers within a period of thirty days of
the order imposing the penalty.
Accordingly, the suggestion of Mr. S, Corporate adviser is not correct, as the offence
under section 42 of Companies Act, 2013 is subject to the adjudication by the adjudication
officer appointed by the Central Government and compounding provisions are not
applicable on defaults in private placement.
Answer 3(c)
According to Section 6 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, besides the High
Courts and the Courts constituted under any law, other than CrPC, there shall be, in
every State, the following classes of Criminal Courts, namely:--
(i) Courts of Session;
(ii) Judicial Magistrates of the first class and, in any metropolitan area, Metropolitan
Magistrates;
(iii) Judicial Magistrates of the second class; and
(iv) Executive Magistrates.
Courts of Magistrates are the basic Courts for conducting trial of criminal offences.
In metropolitan cities such as Mumbai, Kolkata and Chennai, respectively the capitals
of the States of Maharashtra, West Bengal and Tamil Nadu, have special category of
Magistrates called Presidency Magistrates / Chief Metropolitan Magistrates. As per
section 28 and 29 of Criminal Procedure code, 1973, following are the criminal court and
their powers:
The company's risk management structure should include an ongoing effort to assess
and analyze the most likely areas of future risk for the company, including how the
contours and interrelationships of existing risks may change and how the company's
processes for anticipating future risks are developed. This includes understanding risks
inherent in the company's strategic plans, risks arising from the competitive landscape
and the potential for technology and other developments to impact the company's
profitability and prospects for sustainable and long-term value creation. Anticipating
future risks is a key element of avoiding or mitigating those risks before they escalate
into crises. In reviewing risk management, the board or relevant committees should ask
the company's executives to discuss the most likely sources of material future risks
and how the company is addressing any significant potential vulnerability.
Answer 6(b)
The Companies Act, 2013 is mixture of both civil as well as criminal provisions with
majority being criminal. The civil and criminal provisions under the Companies Act,
2013 can be identified by observing the language used by Act for consequences or non-
compliances/contravention of its provisions. The words "liable to penalties" denote civil
nature of non-compliances whereas the words "punishable with fine and/or imprisonment
and/or both" denote criminal nature of non-compliances.
The Act has clearly laid down the mechanism and the forum for speedy and smooth
administration of judicial activities under the Act. The power of adjudication of civil non
compliances (defaults liable for penalties) is being vested with the ROC and the power
of adjudication of criminal non-compliances (offences punishable with fine/ imprisonment)
is being vested with the special courts with sub-delegation of power of compounding of
offences to Regional Director and NCLT.
Thus, the statement given in the question that "Companies Act, 2013 is mixture of
both civil law well as criminal law" is correct.
PP–RCDNR–December 2019 70
Answer 6(c)
Professional indemnity insurance is also known as professional liability insurance
and also as Errors & Omissions (E&O) insurance. It is a type of liability insurance that
works to protect businesses and individuals who provide consultation and services with
the compensation for full and hefty costs arising from the loss that they have caused to
their client. The coverage provided by the insurance company focuses on the alleged
failure of the service delivery by the Company, which has led to the financial loss due to
errors and omissions in the service or consultation.
Some reasons that might make it necessary to have E&O are as under:
• High risk of lawsuits : Not having professional indemnity insurance may put a
person at high risks as many companies may take advantage of the professionals
since they are not completely secured. Moreover, it can put the Company/
Professional in a financial loss if a case is filed against them.
• Risk of losing business : Many clients prefer those companies which has such
insurance for doing business, at times they are keen to know if the Company or
any of its employees makes a mistake, whether it will be covered or not.
Answer 6(d)
As per Rule 4 of Companies (Mediation and Conciliation) Rules, 2016, a Company
Secretary with at least fifteen years of continuous practice is qualified for being empanelled
as mediator or conciliator.
However, as per Rule 5of Companies (Mediation and Conciliation) Rules, 2016, a
person shall be disqualified for being empanelled as mediator or conciliator, if he-
• is an undischarged insolvent or has applied to be adjudicated as an insolvent
and his application is pending;
• has been convicted for an offence which, in the opinion of the Central Government,
involves moral turpitude;
• has been removed or dismissed from the service of the Government or the
Corporation owned or controlled by the Government;
• has been punished in any disciplinary proceeding, by the appropriate disciplinary
authority; or
• has, in the opinion of the Central Government, have such financial or other
interest in the subject matter of dispute or is related to any of the parties, as it
is likely to affect y the discharge of his professional obligations as a mediator
or conciliator.
***